CONCEPTS OF MENTAL HEALTH AND CARE ACCORDING TO MENTALLY-ILL PATIENTS AND THEIR RELATIVES

This study aimed at 1) identifying social, demographic and clinical characteristics of mentally-ill patients and their relatives and 2) analyzing their conceptions concerning mental illness and psychiatric care. The Attitude Measurement Scale (AMS) was used. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the data were carried out. The 104 study subjects comprised 35 patients and 69 relatives (n=104). The Mann-Whitney Test was used for comparing the opinions of patients X relatives and the Wilcoxon Test for comparing Concept and Care. There was homogeneity in the distribution of the subjects’ scores for both Concept and Care. No questions stood out or were concentrated in either group. The subjects’ profile shows the transition from asylum care to innovative experiences, although there is still a concentration of drug treatments and dependence on the psychiatric institution.


INTRODUCTION
The Brazilian advances in mental health care, which result from the global tendency to overcome the asylum model, are slowly moving ahead (1)(2)(3) .The institution on which this study was based is no different from the general picture of mental health care in Brazil and many other countries.
The mentally-ill patients report difficulties in relation to mental health services and their social relationships.They report their contact with grief, prejudices, revolt, hatred and guilt as well as critical moments such as the search for the causes of the problem they are faced with (4)(5) .
These accounts reinforce the need to re-think the relationship between professionals and patients and their relatives, setting aside power relations to make room for relations among citizens.
There is an agreement that the psychiatric care process must move away from healing to daily assistance, providing the possibility of transformation in their lives (6-7)   .Therefore, it was investigated what mentallyill people and their relatives think about the disease and the care offered in this area (8)(9)(10) .
In analyzing the results of the application of an Attitude Measurement Scale with patients, relatives and professionals (11) and its reapplication with nurses students (9) , they observed the need to carry out studies in order to improve the efficiency of the instrument that measured their knowledge about the illness and mental health care.
The critical analysis of the statements as well as of the relevance of each question with a view to reformulating the Attitude Measurement Scale allowed for the exclusion or reformulation of various statements from the original scale.On the basis of the theoretical framework, the result of this critical analysis, as well as the correlation analyses, The authors analyzed the concepts about mental health and care according to the 102 dependents and relatives (12) and now present the analysis of the concepts of mental health and care as displayed by the other group (104 subjects).

OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this study were: 1) to identify the social, demographic and clinical characteristics of mentally-ill individuals and their relatives attending a psychiatric institution and 2) to analyze the conceptions of mental illness and psychiatric care, comparing the opinion of patients and their relatives.

Site
The research was carried out at the Hospital Espírita de Pelotas (HEP) -Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.Upon recording his opinion, the person indicates the extent of his agreement or disagreement according to a graded scale ranging from "I fully agree, I agree I neither agree nor disagree" to "I disagree or I fully disagree".

Sample
The 104 study subjects were selected among the 206 interviewees (psychiatric patients and their relatives) who were given some sort of care provided by the institution (HEP) in July 2002 (Pilot study).
As the main purpose of this study was to know individuals with psychiatric pathologies' concepts about health, mental illness and care, were exclude the 102 substance-dependents.Although this population is assisted in psychiatric institutions, this group's characteristics are more related to social problems than psychiatric disorders.

Ethical procedures
This study was submitted to the evaluation of the Medical Ethics Committee of the Hospital Espírita at Pelotas (RS), which approved its realization.All patients and their relatives were previously informed about the objectives and procedures to be adopted and signed an informed consent document.
Identification data did not show names or information that could individualize the subjects, thus ensuring their anonymity.

Data collection
The subjects were approached by the researcher, who explained the objectives of the study.
Those incapable of providing information (unconscious, confused or under medication effects which prevented their interaction) were excluded.
Social and demographic data (gender, age, marital status, address and profession) and clinical data were obtained through information provided by patients and their relatives.
To apply the test, the researcher read each statement for the subject to choose one of the options, thus expressing their opinion regarding mental health and care concepts in this field.
There was free interlocution between the researcher and the subjects with a view to detecting mistakes and imperfections in both test formulation and content.

Data analysis
Quantitative and qualitative analyses were carried out on the basis of the content expressed by the research subjects.
The AMS data provided information for the statistical analysis, in which the scores referring to the concepts were compared with those concerning care by applying the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests.The aim of the tests was to ascertain statically significant differences between the groups.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The The relatives reported that 63.77% of the patients were male.These subjects' ages were attributed as follows: 42.35% in the range of 20 to 40 years old, 46.38% in the range of 41 to 60, while only 11.9% were over 60 years old (Table 3).

Clinical characteristics
Among the 35 interviewed patients, the clinical characteristics reported by the subjects themselves allowed for some reflections, based on Table 1.
With respect to clinical problems, it was observed that 20 subjects reported not to have any complaints.This represents 57.14% of the replies, whereas the others only informed depression, suicide or nervousness.
An analysis of this indicator showed that the question had not been well formulated, because the subject understood "complaint" as referring to the service and not as their clinical problem.Therefore, this result must be disregarded as a clinical indicator.
In relation to when the disorder had begun, it was observed that 40% of the subjects had had their first symptoms less than 10 years before and 28.57% had presented them between 10 and 20 years ago.One quarter of the 35 subjects (25.71%) had had the disorder for over 20 years.
These data correspond to the information that 77% had up to 10 hospitalizations and 8.57% had over 20.
It is relevant to notice that 11.42% had never been hospitalized.These patients informed that they did their best in order to avoid hospitalizations, thus keeping their social integration (work, school, family, etc).
Concerning the information given by relatives about the patients, it was reported that 63.76% were males with a higher concentration in the age range from 41 to 60 years old (46.37%).
Regarding the beginning of the disorder, the relatives also reported that 23.18% had been ill for over years and that 59.42% had presented their first symptoms less than 10 years before.On the other hand, they informed that 77% had up to hospitalizations and 15.94% had over hospitalizations, as shown in Table 3.
Table 3 -Information from the 69 relatives concerning the psychiatric patient Most of the patients (85.72%) classified their disease as mood disorders or confusion, nervousness, anxiety, stress, and problems in the head.Only 6 (17.14%) denominated themselves as mentally-ill or mad and reported to have hallucinations (Table 1).
Among the relatives, 10.14% did not know about the patient's diagnosis, whereas 31.88% classified it as mental illness, 20.28% as a problem in the head/ nervous breakdown, 10.14% as psychoorganic diseases and 27.53% as depression (Table 3).
Concerning the treatments applied, 94.28% of the patients only reported treatments with drugs, 2 of them did not know and none of them referred to psychotherapy (Table 1).
36.23% of the relatives could not provide any information about the treatments applied to the patients; the others reported that drugs were used for 59.42% and psychotherapy for 4.34% (Table 3).In the Table 4, its possible to observe that

CONCLUSIONS
To arrive at this analysis, an instrument was constructed in accordance with the methodological precepts indicated for these procedures.
In the elaboration of psychological scales, the researcher should follow 3 principles: theoretical, empirical and analytical (14) .Theoretical procedures focus on the subject to be examined; empirical The statistical results from the opinions of patients and their relatives on concepts regarding mental health care showed that there were no significant differences between the opinions of patients and relatives, except in the comparison of concept and care between the two groups of subjects.two-tail test (13) .In the Wilcoxon test for comparing two dependent populations, the alternative hypothesis was that the scores related to concepts surpassed those related to care.
significance tests, validation and reliability tests led to the definition of an Attitude Measurement Scale with 34 statements.The statistical analyses of a new apply of this instrument with 206 subjects allowed for the last corrections in the scale.On the occasion of the data collection, all patients and relatives assisted in the institution answered questions regardless their diagnoses: 102 cases of chemical dependency and 104 psychiatric patients and their relatives.
These subjects' profile reveals the movement of gradual transition from asylum care to innovative experiences, although the concentration of drugbased treatments and dependence on psychiatric institutions are still characteristic.Statistical results of the Opinion Measurement Scale (AMS) The comparisons between groups (Patients and Relatives) and between areas (Concepts and Care) were conducted through the mean score per individual in each area.The statistical tests used were carried out with type-I error probability fixed at 5%.
significant differences between Patients and Relatives occurred neither in relation to mental health concepts nor in relation to care, according to the Mann-Whitney Test.However, when comparing Concepts and Care according to the Wilcoxon Test, a significant difference was observed for both Patients and Relatives.With respect to the mean Patient scores regarding Concepts, the result was 2.73 for patients and 2.71 for relatives, which configures a nonsignificant difference.Similarly, the mean scores regarding Care (1.73) for Patients do not differ very much from the result of the mean scores regarding Care for Relatives (1.65) (Table 5).Table 5 -Mean scores of mentally-ill patients and relatives in relation to Mental health concepts and care In the individual analysis, 10 out of 35 subjects presented a mean value that varied over 3.In the other cases, the mean for Concepts varied from 2 to 3. In relation to care, one individual presented a mean over 3 and seven subjects displayed a mean between 2 and 3, whereas the others were below 2. Regarding the relatives, 18 presented a mean over 3 for Concept and none had a mean over 3 for Care.Standard deviation was 1.73 for patients and 1.73 for Relatives in questions related to Concept, and 1.37 for patients and 1.29 for Relatives related to Care, which indicated homogeneity in the distribution of the subjects' scores for both Concept and Care.Therefore, no questions stood out or were concentrated in either group.
procedures define the steps and techniques for applying the elaborated instrument; analytical procedures establish what statistical and qualitative analyses will be realized on the basis of the obtained data.The analysis of the social and demographic characteristics of patients and relatives showed a population of users that was not different from those found in previous studies.The statements related to mental health and psychiatric care that were presented in this study contain conceptual questions, which verify what is understood as mental health, characteristic behavior of mental patients, their insertion in society and beliefs and expectations about cure, therapeutic procedures and the care system.

Table 4 -
Results of Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon Tests for groups of Patients and Relatives concerning Concepts and Psychiatric Care Note: critical value for the tests: 1.64 Note: critical value for the tests: 1.64

Table 1 -
Social, demographic and clinical characteristics of the 35 psychiatric patients The 35 mentally-ill patients did not have a profession which involved schooling or required a college degree.They were all classified as having simple occupations (housework -8; agriculture -3; general services -7; technical jobs -5; art -3 and self-employment -1).Eight were retired (Table1).

Table 2 -
Social and demographic characteristics of 69 relatives of psychiatric patients