This work considers some of the difficulties implied by an unconsidered use of the word "love " in psychoanalysis. Identifying the semantics that characterize the meanings of this word brings a question forth: "Are those the meanings that compose and orient the psychoanalytic comprehension standards?" This is intended to show how accepting the hypothesis of the unconscious determines the conceptual, semantic axis used to approach whatever may be labeled as "love".
In quite a synthetic way, the author examines the factors that characterize the determinism of love in all its forms. He draws a framework that allows us to determine how the psychoanalytical thought understands the origin of many a suffering they entail. He retrieves and reconsiders how decisive the conception of discovering "love" is. This work is thus a script articulated to highlight: (J) the necessity of reconsidering the implications of the meanings of both transferences and loves in the clinical psychoanalysis; (2) the nature of the love phenomena once the unconscious hypothesis is embraced. A question would still remain in the air: "To what extent would all loves behave as predicted by the chief psychoanalytic métapsychologies? ".