Abstracts
This scoping review evaluated community-sensitive mental health promotion projects in high schools. In total, 15 papers were selected from six major bibliographic databases. Results showed that these programs conceptualize mental health as socially constructed projects, highlighting the need for interventions that are tailored to specific communities in school settings. Challenges included forming partnerships within school communities, responding to unforeseen demands, obtaining funding in contexts that favor universal approaches and prioritize individualized focus, and linking academic and community knowledge. Incorporating human rights-based approaches involves addressing social inequalities and human rights in school mental health interventions. Addressing the social determinants of mental health in school-based programs requires innovative theoretical and methodological intervention models.
Keywords:
Mental health; health promotion; youths; high school
Uma revisão do escopo de projetos de promoção de saúde mental sensíveis à comunidade em escolas de ensino médios é apresentada, a partir de 15 artigos, selecionados de seis grandes bases de dados. Os projetos conceituam a saúde mental como socialmente construída e destacam a necessidade de intervenções adaptadas a cada comunidade. Os desafios incluíram a formação de parcerias dentro das comunidades escolares, a resposta a exigências imprevistas, a obtenção de financiamento em contextos que favorecem abordagens universais individualizantes, e a conexão entre o conhecimento acadêmico e comunitário. A incorporação de abordagens baseadas nos direitos humanos implica o debate sobre as desigualdades sociais nas intervenções escolares. Modelos de intervenção teóricos e metodológicos inovadores são necessários para abordar os determinantes sociais da saúde mental em programas escolares.
Palavras-chave:
Saúde mental; promoção de saúde; jovens; ensino médio
Cet article présente un examen de la portée des projets communautaires de promotion de la santé mentale dans les écoles secondaires, basé sur 15 études sélectionnées dans six grandes bases de données. Les projets conceptualisent la santé mentale comme une construction sociale et soulignent la nécessité d’interventions adaptées à chaque communauté. Les défis comprenaient la formation de partenariats au sein des communautés scolaires, la réponse à des demandes imprévues, l’obtention de financements dans des contextes favorisant des approches universelles donnant la priorité à l’individu et la connexion des connaissances académiques et communautaires. L’intégration d’approches basées sur les droits de l’homme implique le débat sur les inégalités sociales dans les interventions scolaires. Des modèles d’intervention théoriques et méthodologiques innovants sont nécessaires pour aborder les déterminants sociaux de la santé mentale dans les programmes scolaires.
Mots-clés:
Santé; mentale; promotion de la santé; jeunes; lycée
Se presenta una revisión del alcance de los proyectos de promoción de la salud mental sensibles a la comunidad en la secundaria a partir de 15 artículos seleccionados en seis grandes bases de datos. Los proyectos conceptualizan la salud mental como una construcción social y resaltan la necesidad de intervenciones adaptadas a cada comunidad. Los desafíos incluyeron formar alianzas dentro de las comunidades escolares, responder a demandas imprevistas, obtener financiamiento en contextos que favorezcan enfoques universales que prioricen al individuo y conectar el conocimiento académico y comunitario. La incorporación de enfoques basados en los derechos humanos implica el debate sobre las desigualdades sociales en las intervenciones escolares. Se necesitan modelos de intervención teóricos y metodológicos innovadores para abordar los determinantes sociales de la salud mental en los programas escolares.
Palabras-clave:
Salud mental; promoción de la salud; jóvenes; escuela secundaria
Introduction
This paper presents a scoping review of community-sensitive interventions in high schools, analyzing to what extent they consider the social determinants of mental distress and promote collaborative strategies with the school communities. It was developed as part of an intervention project focusing on eight public Brazilian high schools. The general project’s central axis is based primarily on human rights when dealing with the health demands surrounding youth. It seeks to facilitate young people’s access to health and reduce violence between peers through an alliance between high school territory and basic health units close to these schools (Paiva et al., 2021).
Since the beginning of this project, the research team has been asked to develop projects concerning mental health issues in schools since they were considered a significant issue by the school communities. In a study with students from the same schools, based on quantitative research carried out in the end of 2019, about the social determinants of suicidal ideation among them, we observed that being a woman, being LGBT+, and having previous experience of discrimination at school or on the internet proved to be factors associated with a higher prevalence of mental suffering among these young people (Vieira Garcia et al., 2022).
The primary research team identified the need for a comprehensive study of intervention projects that focused on the mental health of high school students. Since the significant project’s background was based on participative research and a human-rights framework, proposals with similar characteristics must be considered.
The debate on the social determinants of mental health and the growing influence of social sciences and the humanities strengthens the critical assessment of the psychiatric explanations for mental distress origins (Rose, 2019). Psychological and psychiatric realities should not be understood outside of their social context (Orford, 2008). Unfortunately, though, interventions for mental health promotion overwhelmingly focus on treating existing mental illnesses detected in previous screening while leaving aside community and societal levels or creating supportive environments for mental health (Enns et al., 2016).
The decline in adolescent and youth mental health indicators worldwide (WHO, 2014) was exacerbated by the SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the need for long-term innovative interventions to mitigate distress in this population (Ford et al., 2021).
If we aim to reduce the consequences on the mental health of children and adolescents of rights neglect and violation, as proposed by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health (Pūras, 2019), the programs that consider the social determinants of mental distress are relevant. Furthermore, when such distress in children and adolescents occurs in institutions, critical approaches should highlight inequalities, social justice, and a distinctly educational vision for change (O’Toole, 2017).
Schools are recognized as essential places for mental health promotion among adolescents and young people (WHO, 2014). However, the interventions commonly directed to schools usually do not consider specificities regarding the school’s agents, including students, teachers, and other workers. They often prioritize universal “packages” of activities, with little dialogue with schools’ realities. When considering the social determinants of mental health, this universal approach may be challenging, as class, race, gender, sexual diversity, and other social determinants impact school communities differently. Because of this, there is a need for community-sensitive research that involves an active partnership with community members and for culturally appropriate methods to conduct this research (Macaulay, Commanda, Freeman et al., 1999).
Community-sensitive interventions in schools refer to strategies and practices designed to address diverse communities’ unique needs, strengths, and cultural contexts within educational settings. These interventions prioritize collaboration with community stakeholders, including students, families, local organizations, and cultural groups, to develop inclusive and culturally responsive programs that promote positive outcomes for all learners (Greenberg et al., 2001). The necessity of community-sensitive interventions in schools, particularly considering race, class, gender, and sexual diversity as critical social determinants of mental health, is crucial for fostering inclusive and supportive learning environments that promote the well-being of all students. Research has highlighted the profound impact of these intersecting social identities on mental health outcomes, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions that address the unique challenges and experiences faced by diverse student populations. A common strategy in these interventions is adopting a culturally relevant curriculum, when schools incorporate diverse perspectives, histories, and experiences to promote students’ sense of identity and belonging (Nieto, 2017).
We consider community-sensitive interventions in schools to be integral to health promotion efforts by addressing social determinants of health, promoting healthy behaviors, creating supportive environments, collaborating with community partners, empowering students and families, and advocating for policy change, in line with the WHO (2014) document that settles that” health promotion has been seen to ask for peace, social justice, decent housing, education, and employment.” However, scientific literature needs to be more comprehensive literature that analyses specific projects in this field. Although many research reviews focused on mental health improvement in school settings, we could not find any focusing specifically on community-sensitive interventions. For this reason, we decided to design a scoping review regarding this theme. In this paper, we present the results and discussion of this review, where we map out mental health promotion projects that adopt a community-sensitive intervention in high schools, analyzing to what extent they manage to consider the social determinants of mental distress and promote collaborative strategies with the school communities.
Method
We conducted a “scoping review” (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005). This systematic review process allows mapping the relevant scientific literature on a given topic, clarifying complex concepts, systematizing the existing knowledge in this field, and identifying gaps in learning through a research agenda.
Our search strategy involved articles published in the ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, and Web of Science databases up to 2020. These databases were selected after consderations of the major ones that discusses the themes of social determinants, education, and mental health related topic.
After an exploratory test, directed to look after whats search terms fitted better to capture the objectives of the present research, we chose the following search terms appearing in abstracts and titles to address the objectives of our review: “mental health” AND “school-based” AND “intervention” AND (“adolescents” OR “youths”).
The research team examined the project scope statement, requirements documentation, and related project documents to identify any inconsistencies or gaps. The abstracts we selected through this process were read by two independent researchers both authors of this article), and a third researcher, who acted as a referee in any cases of disagreement. The inclusion criteria of elegibility for papers were the ones that: (1) described community-sensitive intervention program aimed at promoting mental health; (2) focused on high-schools students, or young people of the same age; (3) were Published in English, French, Spanish, or Portuguese, and (4) had full-text available on the journal’s database of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazil
The exclusion criteria of elegibility were of papers that: (1) did not have mental health as a central theme; (2) described only previously planned models of interventions (developed without the participation of the school community); (3) focused on age groups of students different from our proposal; (4) had only a theoretical approach, without describing any specific program; (5) described interventions that started from a medicalized view of the students (for example, by carrying out screenings of alleged disorders for later treatment)
The search on the datases identified 3235 papers through, after duplicates removed. These papers were subsequently screened by title and abstract. by two independent researchers and a third researcher, who acted as a referee in any cases of disagreement, as pointed out before. After this screrening. 69 papers were selected, and 59 of them (with full-text available) were screened in a second round, regarding the whole paper. By the end of this final screening, 15 papers were selected and are presented and analysed in the results.
Results and discussion
The final screen selected 15 intervention projects, that are summarized in table 2. This item is divided in 5 sections: (1) general results; (2) major theoretical references of the interventions; (3) how papers conceive community and singular practices; (4) how is the construction of the relationship in the interventions projects with the school community and its challenges; (5) what are the challenges concerning local knowledge
General results
Publication years ranged from 1999 to 2019, with the predominance of papers from the last decade (10 out of 15) showing a growing interest in the theme.
There were differences in the scale of interventions - some included hundreds of high schools (Bradshaw et al., 2012; McLeod et al., 2015; Wright-Berryman et al., 2019), others just one (Lafromboise & Lewis, 2008; McLeod et al., 2015; Mevissen et al., 2018; Mulvaney-Day et al., 2006; Murugappan & Vanishree., 2019; Thomas et al., 2008). The project aims, designs, target populations, and methodologies were also quite different.
There were eleven projects in the USA, three in the Indian subcontinent, and one in Europe. The majority of interventions developed in the USA (6 out of 11) exclusively focused on Afro-American, Latino, and Native-American youths (Alicea et al., 2012; Ford-Paz et al., 2019; Garcia et al., 2013; Lafromboise & Lewis, 2008; Mulvaney-Day et al., 2006; Thomas et al., 2008). The scarcity of studies from other continents is noteworthy. The concentration of articles in the USA and english-speaking countries reflects the inequality of scientific production, due, among other factors, to the use of english as a “universal” language in Science. The absence of articles on mental health describing school-based projects in Latin America is notable, especially considering that community health promotion is exceptionally valued in these countries.
Major theoretical references
The studies reviewed are often defined as “participatory research” or “community-based research”. “Ecological”, “systemic”, and “holistic” were the most common terms to define their approach. With different nuances, those approaches assume that each school is a single “community,” “system,” or “ecosystem”, and any intervention requires prior knowledge of its characteristics and involvement with school agents and actors in the project.
Although schools are understood as “communities” or “systems,” the individualizing bias occasionally remained in at least three of the analyzed projects. Mental distress was considered the result of supposed mental disorders in Garcia et al. (2013), as can be seen in their objective defined by to reduce depressive symptoms and perceived stress among girls and to increase healthy coping through individual improvement and social protection resources. The intervention proposed by Balaji et al. (2011) focused mainly on individual outcomes: more effective anger management; better communication skills, self-confidence, and public-speaking skills; reduced smoking; and greater comfort in discussing sexual health issues with friends. Better emotional regulation and academic involvement were the major mental health improvements among the participants in the project conducted by Ford-Paz et al. (2019). The use of validated instruments for measuring the effectiveness of projects - based on responses to individual questionnaires - may have contributed to a more individualized view of mental distress, both regarding psychiatric outcomes, such as the presence (or not) of disturbs, or psychological ones, such as the presence (or not) of social skills
The interventions aiming at the schools as “communities” in two papers did not discuss the broader social context that permeates schools and students. Bradshaw et al. (2012) described prevention strategies aiming at changes in the school environment, improving the school’s organizational climate, and creating systems and procedures for promoting positive changes in the team and, consequently, in the students’ behavior. Likewise, Mulvaney-Day et al. (2006) aimed to improve the school’s organizational climate and reduce the risk of problematic behavior among all the school’s students.
The limited possibility of reaching the “structural” sphere of oppression was a theme of reflection. Mayberry (2013) noted that support groups for LGBT students in schools did not evolve into organizations capable of influencing school policies or that were directly involved in political decision-making processes at school or the state level. The resistance from parents and the fear of conservative reactions among the school management and teachers restricted the development of affirmative actions in the community.
Perhaps the best example of engagement towards structural changes in response to processes causing mental distress in this review was the one described by Thomas et al. (2008). In a project focusing on combating racism, based on an emancipatory perspective, they aimed to encourage young women to engage in actions, such as doing voluntary work in the community and effecting social changes at school. In doing so, students could think about social justice and protest against discrimination by teachers. The emphasis on youth activism was associated with adopting Freire’s critical pedagogy as a theoretical-methodological basis for the project (Thomas et al., 2008).
Conceiving community and singular practices
Universal evidence-based interventions were considered as rarely transferable to the interventions’ environments (Varjas et al., 2005). Effective local adaptation of practices in mental health interventions required modifications to protocols involving a high level of participation, collaboration, and problem-solving to achieve successful implementation (Mulvaney-Day et al., 2006). One alternative was to test the effectiveness of promising interventions, modify them according to the community context, and disseminate them afterward (Ford-Paz et al., 2019).
Focusing on the context within which young people live was considered necessary in the analyzed projects since mental health and mental distress depend on their interaction with the social environment. Bradshaw et al. (2012) advocated the involvement of communities as researchers’ partners in their community-based participatory research. They recognized each collaborator’s unique role in the process, thus increasing the possibility of reaching positive results and sustainable changes.
As we pointed out before, the majority of projects developed in the USA focused on the social and ethnic identity of the minority groups - blacks, Latinos, and indigenous. The emphatic defense of the “cultural” specificity of these groups demanded projects different from the ones initially designed for white students, i.e., projects considered neutral or universal. Thomas et al. (2008) discussed how approaches with “universal” ambitions historically expressed middle-class white values and how these strategies and materials were not applicable or practical for young black people who accumulate other experiences.
Demographic shifts in the United States have driven efforts to revise school curricula. For example, McLeod et al. (2015) highlighted the changes they had made for their intervention to be culturally more sensitive after young people (especially young blacks and Latinos) had assessed the original curriculum as inappropriate to their reality. This demanded a process of recreation of the program’s scenarios, activities, and language.
Three culturally specific projects focused on minority girls considering that activities were more effective if the gender and race/ethnicity of the participants were simultaneously considered (Ford-Paz et al., 2019; Garcia et al., 2013; Thomas et al., 2008). In two other projects, interventions were drawn on sexual orientation and gender identity (Mayberry, 2013; Mevissen et al., 2018). These studies supported the need for specific attention to this population segment, which is often a target for bullying, as described in the extensive literature on this matter (Espelage et al., 2019).
On the other hand, projects on the Indian subcontinent discussed that programs considered effective express “Western universal” values. Varjas et al. (2005) highlighted that interventions within school psychology had little cultural specificity while emphasizing that considering local characteristics could increase interventions’ acceptability, validity, and sustainability. Balaji et al. (2011) highlighted the diversity of Indian regional contexts and the different modes of sociability among young people between cities and the countryside. Motes et al. (1999) also advocated specific strategies for urban or rural schools in the United States.
The articles reviewed here highlighted the importance of teams that included researchers who shared the exact ethnic/racial origin and expressed diverse gender and sexual identities. Two papers described that “native” languages were used in the intervention (Garcia et al., 2013; Lafromboise & Lewis, 2008).
Construction of the relationship with the school community and its challenges
Partnerships with school communities were established in unique ways. The projects also differed in the degree of community involvement in the construction and implementation of the interventions. Addressing the most pressing needs of educators and policymakers facilitated relationship-building with the school community (Bradshaw et al., 2012). Although short-term actions were necessary to solve minor and immediate demands from the school community, more significant or “systemic” problems required a prolonged approach. For Mulvaney-Day et al. (2006), “small victories” in limited issues are part of building partnerships with the school community.
At least in two projects, school-focused interventions expanded to improve schools’ relationships with external agents. Motes et al. emphasized that systemic change required school teams to communicate frequently with community representatives, such as the police, judiciary, and social services, to improve the connections between individual services and systemic changes, even when working with a single young person (Motes et al., 1999). This ecological approach also was thought to alter school system processes and involved various agents of change: young people, teachers, parents, classmates, and school staff. Alicea et al. (2012), whose project focused on young people’s adherence to mental health services, strongly emphasized the interventions needed to improve their interface with schools. Motes et al. 1999) cited one program was set up to meet the needs of young people and families of Hispanic migrant workers in the community where the school was located. Another program in a different neighborhood led to the formation of a club for African-American youth to voice their concerns and serve as a support organization. Finally, a third program involved joining a community task force that addressed the theme of violence in the community (Motes et al. 1999).
Unplanned demands that result from the intervention itself or situations relating to the social context were identified as significant challenges. However, such requests could not always be met due to limitations on the researchers’ time, financial resources, and human resources. For instance, the intervention project could become unexpectedly complex, requiring additional resources and extended timelines (Mulvaney-Day et al., 2006). In addition, the demand for addressing traumatic situations experienced by the students being followed through the project, as described by Ford-Paz et al. (2019), showed a similar challenge.
Garcia et al. (2013) and Lafromboise and Lewis (2008) described strategies for collective listening in the community context before designing the intervention. In the later one, they had a three-year involvement process with an indigenous community before the intervention project.
Including people from the community as active agents in the intervention process (“peers”) was an auxiliary strategy for disseminating the project across schools. In threee cases, it was the primary strategy (Mayberry, 2013; McLeod et al., 2015; Wright-Berryman et al., 2019). These papers describe that the peer students underwent some training and could count on supervision by the research team. The other students often indicated these peer students by their capacity to communicate and receive the others’ emotional problems. For this to happen, permission from the families was needed.
Although the experiences of participant adherence were generally positive, effective participation by people in the school community as part of the process was not achieved in at least two interventions. Mevissen et al. (2018) highlight teachers’ difficulty to co-produce a manual on sexual diversity, which they attribute to excessive activities. In addition, Balaji et al. (2011) report weak interaction between teachers and peer students, making it challenging to integrate the “emotional education” program into schools.
Challenges concerning local knowledge
Developing intervention proposals that are simultaneously “scientifically valid” - especially those that incorporate strategies that have already been studied through randomized controlled trials (RCT) - and that sustain a dialogue with the school community was considered a challenge. This tension may be caused by the emphasis in health-related research on using randomized clinical trials as the “gold standard,” strengthening the focus on individual risk factors rather than social or environmental factors (Israel et al., 1998, pp. 173-174). In response, there was partial incorporation of proposed intervention “packages,” especially models derived from cognitive-behavioral and sociocognitive approaches. Bradshaw et al. (2012), for example, used the principles of social, behavioral learning, and organizational behavior typical in individual policies. They extended them to the entire student body in the various schools where their intervention occurred.
On the other hand, three papers suggested that there were deeper links between local and traditional knowledge. In these cases, local knowledge gained the “status” of a theoretical as a co-basis of the project. The project of Thomas et al. (2008) used the “Nguzo Saba” principles to mitigate the consequences of racism among students. These principles of African culture contribute to constructing the notions of family, community, and culture among Afro-descendants as a means of working towards the ideal of communitarianism, as opposed to Western individualism. Murugappan and Vanishree (2019) actively included appreciation of the “swabhava” of the participants. This Indian concept refers to the intrinsic nature of each person to seek to value intuition and wisdom in understanding their mental health. The intervention carried out by Lafromboise and Lewis (2008) began with an open invocation from a Zuni leader, asking students to remember that the life given to them is their greatest gift, which is an essential element of the tradition of this indigenous group.
Thomas et al. (2008) incorporated Freire’s critical pedagogy to involve students in discussions about racism. As a result, the students reflected on concrete experiences and dialogued about their meaning and understanding. From this, their awareness of their sociopolitical environment could be broadened, thus enabling their engagement in activism for social change.
Conclusion
The findings from this scoping study underscore the significant importance of community-sensitive programs, which actively engage with local contexts and challenge conventional models of standardized intervention units. These programs reconceptualize mental health issues as socially constructed phenomena, emphasizing the relevance of community-sensitive interventions for promoting mental health within school settings.
The literature reviewed examines social determinants of mental health, with many papers highlighting the potential impacts of various forms of oppression, such as racism, class inequality, sexism, and homophobia. However, subsequent interventions often focused primarily on individual responses to these forms of oppression (such as skills development and empowerment) rather than addressing structural factors. Some initiatives sought to extend beyond the school environment to engage with broader social contexts.
The geographical distribution of projects, with a concentration in the USA and English-speaking countries, reflects the dominance of English as a “universal” scientific language, even in databases that include other languages. Within the USA, interventions primarily targeted minority segments of school communities, including Black, Latino, and LGBT+ populations, which is also related to the critics or universal models of interventions.
Several challenges were identified in establishing partnerships within school communities, responding to unforeseen demands, and securing project approval within prevailing research and intervention funding contexts prioritizing universal approaches. Some projects retained an individualized perspective on mental distress, potentially due to validation requirements from the scientific community, which often rely on individual questionnaire responses to measure project effectiveness.
The pressure to demonstrate healthcare effectiveness may have led some researchers to focus on individual risk factors, potentially hindering integration between academic and community knowledge within these projects. The absence of strategies linking academic and community knowledge poses a theoretical and methodological challenge, suggesting the need for a deeper examination of researchers’ roles in intervention projects.
In light of human rights-based approaches, overcoming the limitations of individualizing methods requires profound reflection on the role of researchers in intervention contexts, which includes moving beyond supporting individuals who embody differences shaped by social inequalities and instead incorporating inequality analysis and human rights discourse to inform community-sensitive understandings of mental health distress within schools.
Some interventions focused solely on building individual resilience to oppression without creating collective spaces for reflection and social action. However, addressing social change processes can mitigate mental distress by acknowledging its social production and collective dynamics, particularly in school environments.
Innovative theoretical and methodological intervention models are needed to address the social construction of mental distress, particularly within academic spaces. Understanding how youth human rights violations contribute to psychosocial suffering at the school and community levels is crucial for promoting the mental well-being of future generations.
References
-
Alicea, S., Pardo, G., Conover, K., & McKay, M. (2012). Step-up: Promoting youth mental health and development in inner-city high schools. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-011-0344-3
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-011-0344-3 -
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
» https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 -
Balaji, M., Andrews, T., Andrew, G., & Patel, V. (2011). The Acceptability, Feasibility, and Effectiveness of a Population-based Intervention to Promote Youth Health: An Exploratory Study in Goa, India. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(5), 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.029
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.029 -
Bradshaw, C. P., Pas, E. T.; Bloom, J., Barrett, S., Hershfeldt, P., Alexander, A., McKenna, M., Chafin, A. E., & Leaf, P. J. (2012). A state-wide partnership to promote safe and supportive schools: The PBIS Maryland Initiative. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 39(4), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-011-0384-6
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-011-0384-6 -
Enns, J., Holmqvist, M., Wener, P., Halas, G., Rothney, J., Schultz, A., Goertzen, L, & Katz, A. (2016). Mapping interventions that promote mental health in the general population: A scoping review of reviews. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 87, 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.022
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.022 -
Espelage, D. L., Valido, A., Hatchel, T., Ingram, K. M., Huang, Y., & Torgal, C., (2019). A literature review of protective factors associated with homophobic bullying and its consequences among children & adolescents. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.003 -
Ford, T., John, A., & Gunnell, D. (2021). Mental health of children and young people during pandemic. BMJ, n614. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n614
» https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n614 -
Ford-Paz, R. E., Crown, L., Lawton, K., Goldenthal, H., Day, G., Coyne, C. A.; Gill, T., Harris, N., Blakemore, S., & Cicchetti, C. (2019). Working on Womanhood (WOW): A participatory formative evaluation of a community-developed intervention. Evaluation and Program Planning, 72, 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.007
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.007 -
Garcia, C., Pintor, J., Vazquez, G., & Alvarez-Zumarraga, E. (2013). Project Wings, a coping intervention for Latina adolescents: A pilot study. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35(4), 434-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945911407524
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945911407524 -
Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C., & Bumbarger, B. (2001). The prevention of mental disorders in school-aged children: Current state of the field. Prevention & Treatment, 4(1), Article 1a. https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.4.1.41a
» https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.4.1.41a -
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J.; Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173-202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
» https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 -
Lafromboise, T. D., & Lewis, H. A. (2008). The Zuni Life Skills Development Program: A school/community-based suicide prevention intervention. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 38(3), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2008.38.3.343
» https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2008.38.3.343 -
Macaulay, A. C.; Commanda, L. E.; Freeman, W, L,; Gibson, N.; McCabe. M. L.; Robbins, C.M. et al. (1999). Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement BMJ; 319, 774. https://doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774
» https://10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774 -
Mayberry, M. (2013). Gay-Straight Alliances: Youth Empowerment and Working toward Reducing Stigma of LGBT Youth. Humanity & Society, 37(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597612454358
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597612454358 -
McLeod, D. A., Jones, R., & Cramer, E. P. (2015). An evaluation of a school-based, peer-facilitated, healthy relationship program for at-risk adolescents. Children & Schools, 37(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdv006
» https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdv006 -
Mevissen, F. E. F., Kok, G., Watzeels, A., Van Duin, G., & Bos, A. E. R. (2018). Systematic development of a dutch school-based sexual prejudice reduction program: An intervention mapping approach. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 15(4), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0301-1
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0301-1 -
Motes, P. S., Melton, G., Simmons, W. E. W., & Pumariega, A. (1999). Ecologically oriented school-based mental health services: Implications for service system reform. Psychology in the Schools, 36(5), 391-401. https://doi/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199909)36:5%3C391::AID-PITS3%3E3.0.CO;2-C
» https://doi/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199909)36:5%3C391::AID-PITS3%3E3.0.CO;2-C - Mulvaney-Day, N. E.; Rappaport, N., Alegría, M., & Codianne, L. M. (2006). Developing systems interventions in a school setting: An application of community-based participatory research for mental health. Ethnicity & Disease, 16(1), S107-117.
- Murugappan, N. P., & Vanishree, A. N. (2019). School-based Mental Health Promotion for Urban Adolescents in India. JOURNAL OF INDIAN ASSOCIATION FOR CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH, 15(4), 46-67.
-
Nieto, S. (2017). Language, Culture, and Teaching: Critical Perspectives (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315465692
» https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315465692 - Orford, J. (2008). Community psychology: Challenges, controversies and emerging consensus John Wiley & Sons.
-
O’Toole, C. (2017). Towards dynamic and interdisciplinary frameworks for Sshool-based mental health promotion. Health Education, 117(5), 452-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-11-2016-0058
» https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-11-2016-0058 -
Paiva, V., Garcia, M. R. V., França-Jr, I., da Silva, C. G., Galeão-Silva, L. G.,Simões, J. A.. Ayres, J. R., & Reseach Group on Youth’s Health and Human Rights (2021). Youth and the COVID-19 crisis: Lessons learned from a human rights-based prevention programme for youths in São Paulo, Brazil. Global Public Health, 16(8-9), 1454-1467. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1916055
» https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1916055 -
Pfefferbaum, B., & North, C. S. (2020). Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(6), 510-512. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2008017
» https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2008017 -
Pūras, D. (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, UN Doc. A/HRC/41/34, 2019. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3803412
» https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3803412 -
Rajkumar, R. P. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066 - Rose, N. S. (2019). Our psychiatric future: The politics of mental health Polity.
-
Thomas, O., Davidson, W., & McAdoo, H. (2008). An evaluation study of the young empowered sisters (YES!) program: Promoting cultural assets among African American adolescent girls through a culturally relevant school-based intervention. Journal of Black Psychology, 34(3), 281-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798408314136
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798408314136 -
Varjas, K., Nastasi, B. K., Bernstein Moore, R., & Jayasena, A. (2005). Using Ethnographic Methods for Development of Culture-Specific Interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.006
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.006 -
Vieira Garcia, M. R., dos Santos Barros, C. R., Facciola Paiva, V. S., Corrochano, M. C., Barbosa, D., de Souza Machado dos Reis, N. ., & Silva Plácido, D. (2022). Prevalence and social determinants of suicidal ideation among Brazilian public high school students. Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social, 8(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2022.8.2.250
» https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2022.8.2.250 -
World Health Organization and Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Social determinants of mental health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/112828/9789241506809_eng.pdf
» https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/112828/9789241506809_eng.pdf -
Wright-Berryman, J., Hudnall, G., Bledsoe, C., & Lloyd, M. (2019). Suicide concern reporting among Utah youths served by a school-based peer-to-peer prevention program. Children & Schools, 41(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdy026
» https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdy026
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
13 June 2025 -
Date of issue
2025
History
-
Received
17 Apr 2024 -
Accepted
03 Nov 2024