Acessibilidade / Reportar erro
This erratum corrects:

ERRATUM

In the manuscript “In time: The value and global implications of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency”, DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;4;00020, published in the Rev Paul Pediatr. 2018;36(4):388-397:

Page 388:

Where it reads:

Cristina Meehana

Jolan Walter

It should read:

Cristina A. Meehan

Jolan E. Walter

Page 389:

Page 389: Where it reads:

Figure 1
Timeline of severe combined immunodeficiency therapy.

It should read:

Figure 1
History of severe combined immunodeficiency therapy.

Page 390, first column:

Where it reads:

Table 1
Genetic background of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) listed by immunological phenotype.

It should read:

Table 1
Genetic background of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) listed by immunological phenotype.

Page 390, second column:

Where it reads:

However, since the implementation of SCID NBS depends on state legislatures, the implementation time is variable across the United States. Since the first pilot program began in Wisconsin in 2009, 47 of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have sequentially implemented or have committed to implement SCID NBS (Jeffrey Modell Foundation; Figure 2).11,29,30

It should read:

Since the first pilot program began in Wisconsin in 2008, all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have sequentially implemented SCID NBS (Immune Deficiency Foundation, Jeffrey Modell Foundation; Figure 2A)11,29,30

Where it reads:

Figure 2
Severe combined immunodeficiency newborn screening implementation worldwide as of August 2018.30

It should read:

Figure 2
Severe combined immunodeficiency newborn screening implementation in the United States* (A) and worldwide30 (B) by December 2018.

Page 394,

Where it reads:

[...] Analysis of screening of three million newborns for SCID after the initiation of SCID NBS confirmed a higher-than-expected prevalence of 1:58,000, increasing from 1:100,000 in 2009 prior to NBS. [...]

It should read:

[...] Analysis of screening of three million newborns for SCID after the initiation of SCID NBS confirmed a higher-than-expected prevalence of 1:58,000, increasing from 1:100,000 in 2008 prior to NBS.25 [...]

Where it reads:

We thank and acknowledge Dr. Jane Carver from the University of South Florida, for their assistance in the editing of this document.

It should read:

We thank and acknowledge Dr. Jane Carver from theUniversity of South Florida for assistance in editing this document.

Page 395,

Where it reads:

30. Jeffrey Modell Foundation. Newborn screening for SCID. Update on the implementation of newborn screening for SCID in the United States [Internet]. August 2018 [cited on Sept. 25, 2018]. Available at: http://www.info4pi.org/ town-hall/newborn-screening

It should read:

30. Adapted from Jeffrey Modell Foundation. Newborn screening for SCID. Update on the implementation of newborn screening for SCID in the United States [Internet]. December 2018 [cited on January 13, 2019]. Available at: http://www.info4pi.org/ town-hall/newborn-screening.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    30 Apr 2020
  • Date of issue
    2020
Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo R. Maria Figueiredo, 595 - 10o andar, 04002-003 São Paulo - SP - Brasil, Tel./Fax: (11 55) 3284-0308; 3289-9809; 3284-0051 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rpp@spsp.org.br