Possible Consequences of Increasing Life Expectancy in Brazil. the Perspective of a European Historical Demographer

IMHOF, A. E. Possible consequences of increasing life expectancy in Brazil. The perspective of a European historical demographer. ABSTRACT: Those over sixty years of age accounted for 6.6% of the total population of Brazil in 1985, in the Federal Republic of Germany this proportion was 20.3% in 1984. As early as 1950 it had been 14.5%. This proportion will not even be reached in Brazil in the year 2000 when persons aged sixty years and older are only projected to make up 8.8% of the total population. Similarly, in 1982/84 life expectancy at birth in the Federal Republic was 70.8 years for men and 77.5 for women; in Brazil the figures for 1980/85 were, by contrast, "only" 61.0 and 66.0. Against this background it is easy to understand why the discussion concerning an ageing society with its many related medical, economic, individual and social problems has been so slow in coming into its own in Brazil. As important as a more intensive consideration of these aspects may be in Brazil at present, they are, nevertheless, only one side of the story. For a European historical demographer with a long-term perspective of three of four hundred years, the other side of the story is just as important. The life expectancy which is almost ten years lower in Brazil is not a result of the fact that no one in Brazil lives to old age. In 1981 people sixty-five years and older accounted for 34.4% of all deaths! At the same time infants accounted for only 22.1% of total mortality. They are responsible, along with the "premature" deaths among youths and adults, for the low, "average" life expectancy figure. In Europe, by contrast, these "premature" deaths no longer play much of a role. In 1982/84 more than half of the women (52.8%) in the Federal Republic of Germany lived to see their eightieth birthdays and almost half of the men (47.3%) lived to see their seventy-fifth. Our biological existence is guaranteed to an extent today that would have been unthinkable a few generations ago. Then, the classic troika of "plague, hunger and war" threatened our forefathers all the time and everywhere. The radical transition from the formerly uncertain to a present-day certain lifetime, which is the result of the repression of "plague, hunger and war", led to unexpected consequences for our living together. Our forefathers were forced to live in closely knit …


INTRODUCTION
During a first guest professorship for postgraduate studies in historical demography at the "Universidade Federal do Paraná" (UFPR) in "Curitiba" Brazil and at the "Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul" (PUCRS) in "Porto Alegre", Brazil, in 1984 I concentrated on the topic of "Mortality Problems in Brazil and Germany: Past-presentfuture.Learning from each other?"(Imhof 19 ).During a second such professorship at the same universities in 1986, with new groups of post-graduate students, discussion centered on the topic "Possible consequences of increased life expectancy in Brazi 1 -from t he perspecive of a European historical demographer".It could not, of course, be my task in this context to teach Brazilians what they already know better and are able to judge more appropriately than a European coming from abroad (Mundigo 30 , 1986, Fundação SEADE 35 , 1982).
By the same token it is not the intention of this paper to discuss e.g. the economic implications of an aging Brazilian society, nor the resulting necessity of more homes for the aged or more geriatric stations for long-term chronically ill patients.Even though the literature on this topic is not as extensive as in Europe, where we have known these problems for a longer period of time, there is a discussion in progress in Brazil, debates are conducted in daily newspapers, conferences and congresses are held, training courses in geriatrics and gerontology are arranged and scientific studies are published (Boemer 3 , 1986, Born 4 , 1986, Folha de São Paulo 18 , 1986, Gaiarsa 14 , 1986, Gazeta do Povo 1,26 , 1986, Haddad 17 , 1986, LBA 12,13 , 1986 and Leite*, 1986, Mabilde 23 , 1985, Macedo 24 , 1983, Magalhães 25 , 1982, Netto 30,31 , 1985, Netto e col.**, 1983, Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba 32 , 1986, Queiroz 33,34 , 1986, Salgado 36,37 , 1982.These few references should be enough to prove that Brazilians have obviously not been waiting for us to come and make them aware of the topic of an ageing society and the multitude of problems related to it.I would much prefer to concentrate on that which I was repeatedly asked, not only by historical demographers but also when speak-ing to gerontologists, sociologists, psychologists, politicians, physicians and others employed in the public health system.They all wanted a European historian to outline some of the longterm perspectives in relation to an increasing life-expectancy on the basis of his European experience, on the one hand, and to try to interpret the current tendencies and developments in Brazil against this background, on the other. Even though I will try to perform this delicate task in the following, it is, of course, up to every Brazilian to accept my considerations, or to modify or to reject them.The proffered term "tendencies" helps me to overlook some of my own reservations: Reservations with regard to the sources, por example, in the face of the well-known fact that vital statistics are underregistered and the consequently reduced reliability of the "hard facts", on which I, nevertheless, have to base my arguments (Laurenti and col. 21, 1985: 50-56, 70-73; Mello Jorge 27 , 1983).
Comparing current "tendencies" in Brazil with historical "tendencies" in Europe saves us from the misleading assumption that we are dealing with "parallels" here, with automatisms, with accurately predictable or even calculable developments that are only taking place in Brazil with a time delay of a few decades, but which principally will proceed, or even have to proceed according to the European pattern.A certain probability exists in this context.But it does not have to develop in this direction and certainly not with calculable regularity.Brazil is not Europe and the Brazilians of "Norte, Nordeste, Sudeste, Sul" or "Centro-Oeste" are not the Europeans of Central Europe which populate the horizon of my experience.In short: it is not my main intention to teach historically derived dogma, much less to discuss decimal points, but rather to go beyond the decimal points and to provide food for thought.

The Facts in Brazil
According to figures from the Brazilian Statistical Bureau (Fundação IBGE 10 ), infant mortality in 1975/80 was 78.77 per one thousand live births, the life expectancy at birth was 59.54 years for men and 64.25 for women (Figure 1, top).In the Federal Re-"A Previdência Social e a Aposentadoria no Brasil", manuscript prepared by C. B. Leite, based on the Round-Table held in the "Curso de Formação em Gerontologia Social" ministered by the International Center of Social Gerontology, Rio de Janeiro, July, 7 th to 18 th , 1986.Report presented by A. J. Netto and colaborators, on the present situation of the program for the elderly in 1983.public of Germany the infant mortality rate in 1980 was 12.7 and the life expectancy 1982/84 was 70.84 and 77.47 years for men and women respectively (Statistisches Bundesamt 40 , 1986: 70, 76).Brazil will still not have caught with to us in the five year period 2020/25 if the figure for infant mortality there is 29.80 per thousand and life expectancy 69.05 and 75.26 years.These are not my projections and, therefore, not my idea of what I, a foreigner, might consider desirous.On the contrary, they are the goals projected by an official Brazilian bureau and published in the Anuário Estatístico do Brasil 1985 (Fundação IBGE 10 , 1986: 127).Apparently this development is considered desirous and attainable in the country itself.I simply take them into consideration in the following.
Against this background it is easier to understand why, in Brazil, one so often hears that the infant mortality is much "too high" and the life expectancy is much "too low".That too many life years are lost through diseases that could have been avoided.If we compare recent statistics from both countries with each other, those for Brazil from the year 1982 and those for the Federal Republic of Germany for 1985, the picture that presents itself is highly differentiated.In Brazil 448 people died of diphtheria (032, ICD-9), in the Federal Republic 0. For whooping cough (033) the ratio was 391 to 5. For tetanus (037) 713 to 6, for measles (055) 1670 to 5, for malaria (084) 578 to 22, and for symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions of the digestive system (009) a surprising 32,049 to 185 (Ministério da Saúde 28 , 1985: 326-327; Statistisches Bundesamt 1986 41 : 5-9).Even the plague (020) has not been fully eliminated in Brazil.In 1982 151 cases were reported none of which, however, ended in death (Fundação IBGE 10 , 1986: 199).
If, in addition, the relatively small proportion of elderly people in Brazil is considered (Figure 1, bottom), then it becomes quite clear why Brazilians consider infant mortality "too high", life expectancy "too low" and "unnecessarily forfeited life years" still seem more important than the problems of an ageing population at the other end of the spectrum.Indeed, Brazilians between the ages of sixty and sixty-nine accounted for only 4.0% of the population, those seventy years and older for only 2.6%, altogether those aged sixty and older made up only 6.6% of the population (IBGE 10 1986, 61).In the Federal Republic, on the other hand, this group repre-sented 20.3% of the population in 1984.As early as 1950 the figure in the Federal Republic was as high as 14.5% (Statistisches Bundesamt 40 , 1986: 62).This figure will not even be attained in Brazil in the year 2000 when the proportion is projected to be 8.0%.
A superficial consideration of all these data can easily lead one to the conclusion that the "aged" and their problems do not carry any real weight in Brazil and merely represent a negligible fringe group at the upper end of the population pyramid.At the bases of this pyramid there is, at present, much to be done and one must, therefore, continue to concentrate primarily on the fastest possible reduction in infant and child mortality as well as the avoidable mortality of people at prime ages.I do not want to deny for a minute that all these aspects are really still very important in Brazil, in any case more important than they are in Europe.If one makes low infant mortality and high life expectancy in Europe, or anywhere else in the First World, a criterion -as is done in Brazil and in other countries in the Second, Third and Fourth Worlds and as was expressed in the goals set by the Brazilian Statistical Bureau it can, however, easily lead those countries into a dilemma.They want to "catch up" as fast as possible and to at least come close to the "better" figures found in the First World.It seems to me that such a comparative approach is inclined to mask or to excessively repress other important facts.
On the basis of his scientific knowledge the European historical demographer is inclined to cast a critical eye on another development which is just as clearly expressed in the Brazilian figures, if one is willing to recognize it.For this purpose I will repeat a simple experiment that I made with my postgraduate students in Curitiba in order to give them something to think about.In Table 1 the burial lists from a German and a Brazilian city of comparable size from a randomly chosen day in 1986 appear side by side.The German city is Munich (1985: 1,266,100 inhabitants; Statistisches Bundesamt 40 , 1986: 59), the Brazilian city is Curitiba (1984: 1,227,322 inhabitants; "Departamento Estadual de Estatística" 5 , 1986: 53).
Although the number of cases for Munich and Curitiba, with 24 and 18 deaths respectively, are relatively small, the life expectancy calculated on the basis of these samples corresponds closely to the current life expectancy in both countries (in 1982/84 men in the Federal Republic could count on 70.8 and women 77.5 years, of life, in Brazil the figures for 1980/86 were 61.0 and 66.0 for men and women respectively).That means we currently have about seventy-five years to live in Central Europe; and the Brazilians about sixty-five.This roughly ten year shorter life expectancy is not, however, a result of the fact that no one in Brazil ever lives to an old or even very old age.Pedro in Curitiba lived to be ninety just as Ida in Munich did; Francisco even lived to be ninety-two exceeding all of the cases reported for Munich.To the same extent, cases of people dying in their eighties are neither seldom in the one nor the other city.Yet what one also finds in Brazil -and this accounts for the greatest difference from Europe -are the massive number of deaths of children, adolescents and young adults (Márcio: nine years old; René: fifteen years old; Mariza: twenty-one years old), not to mention the burials of infants and small children which are obviously not reported in Curitiba.They are the major factor in sinking the "average age at death" and, therefore, the "average life expectancy" in Brazil.
One must avoid being mislead by the population pyramid with its relatively small proportion of aged and the low average life expectancy, but should instead contrast the share of infant mortality with the share of mortality among the aged, then it becomes immediately clear that in Brazil there is not only still a high rate of infant mortality but that mortality among the aged also plays a major role.Indeed that it is already higher.In 1981 deaths under one year of age accounted for 22.1% of all mortality while those over sixty-five years of age accounted for 34.4%!Every tenth burial was, according to official statistics, of a person over eighty years of age (11.2%).
It is not my purpose here to enter into a long debate concerning the quality of the sources, for example how high the underregistration of infant mortality, which is doubtless a factor, might be.The mortality pattern among adults is more important for my argu-mentation.And this is what is expressed in Table 1, with the complete exclusion of the mortality of infants and small children.Mortality among adults, and not among infants and small children, primarily determines how certain life appears to people who are consciously engaged in making life plans and setting concrete goals for themselves which an historian can later attempt to determine.Figure 2, along with Table 1, does not let any doubt arise that adult life has also become relatively certain in Brazil.More than half of all males (50.2%) lived to be 65 years old as early as 1975, for women this figure was almost two-thirds (64.7%) (Fundação IBGE 10 , 1986: 125).In the Federal Republic of Germany, by comparison, the figures for 1970/72 were 68.5% for men and 81.4% for women (Statistisches Bundesamt 40 , 1986: 76).We have to return to the period between the two World Wars in Germany in order to find conditions similar to those which exist in Brazil today: for men back to 1924/26 (52.7%) and for women back to 1932/34 (63.7%) (Statistisches Bundesamt 40 , 1986: 76).
In the meantime our lives have become biologically so certain in Central Europe that, in 1982/84, more than half of all women (52.8%) saw their eightieth and almost half of all men (47.3%) saw at least their seventy-fifth birthdays.We are fully aware of this high degree of security which would have been unthinkable a few generations ago.The relatively few who die earlier, primarily because of accidents and suicide, do not impair our feeling of greater biological certainty.Many already believe that they have a right to a life of seventy-five or eighty years.If someome dies earlier then the obituary accusingly asks: "Why so early?" What is, however, also expressed in Figure 2 is the fact that there are major regional differences within Brazil.This can be seen again in Figure 3.In order to demonstrate the relationship and interdependence of population structure, mortality distribution and causes of death to my post-graduate students, the appropriate data for every Brazilian state were collected in a common effort, analyzed and presented graphically.Figure 3 contains a summary of this work on a superordinate level for the five major regions in Brazil.In the center of the figure the analog segmentai representations of the respective parts of Brazil and the Federal Republic are shown.
I hardly need to explain the details in a Brazilian journal of public health.For easily recognized reasons a population pyramid with a wide base rapidly becoming narrower towards the top correlates with a mortality pattern in which there is a high percentage of infant mortality and a relatively wide distribution of mortality in every other age category (the type found in "Norte" and "Nordeste").These two presentations, in turn, correspond with a mortality distribution in which a high percentage of infectious and parasitic diseases but also symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions are found (again "Norte" and "Nordeste").
The narrower the base of the pyramid the more mortality is shifted from the youngest to an ever older group (the type found in "Sul" and "Sudeste"), and the higher the proportion in the category II (neoplasms) and VII (diseases of the circulatory system) (again "Sul" and "Sudeste").This phenomenon is even more obvious in the Federal Republic of Germany today than is the case for the southernmost states in Brazil.Here one finds a reversal in the former ratios and proportions; 20.4% of the population in the Federal Republic is over sixty years of age (in Brazil, 5.9%, in Rio Grande do Sul, 7.1%); 77.3% of all deaths occur at an age over sixty-five (Brazil 34.4%, Rio Grande do Sul, 44.0%).And 74.3% of all causes of death are based, in the Federal Republic, on neoplasms and diseases of the circulatory system (Brazil, 34.6%, Rio Grande do Sul, 50.2%).
From this complex I would like to isolate two points for further consideration.Firstly what we see here is the basic transition from the "old" to the "new" form of dying.The further the epidemiological transition has proceeded in a population, the fewer people die of "avoidable" traditional infectious and parasitic diseases and the greater the proportion that dies of cancer and diseases of the heart and circulatory systems.It is not only the distribution of mortality that undergoes a process of change in this context but also the "quality" of dying.Infectious and parasitic diseases may occur at every age, but most of them kill relatively rapidly.It is a quick and gracious death.Chronic conditions do, of course, let us live longe, but they often lead to a long process of dying.Death lets us wait for him.He tortures us often for weeks, months and years before finally taking pity and releasing us.This is what many of us in the First World fear: suffering without end with continually increasing dependency on our environment, a drawn out physical and psychic struggle with death in a no win situation.
Secondly it is a fact that the Brazilian states in the "Sudeste" region, particularly "Sul", have come the furthest in terms of this development.The segmentai representations of the population structure, mortality distribution and causes of death always tend to look the most "European" (for S. Paulo cf.Laurenti e Lolio 21 , 1986).Even if one allows for a large margin of error in these statistics, it is still possible to maintain the principle conclusion to which they lead us.This indicates that the southernmost states have come the furthest on the path from the "old" to the "new" problems: less mortality among infants and small children, therefore more mortality among the aged; less infectious and parasitic disease, therefore more chronic conditions as the cause of death.This was decisive in my making the decision to accept a UFPR and PUCRS guest professorship in southern Brazil.Just as I see myself, coming from Europe where the entire problem reversal has progressed much further, as having a responsibility to point out problems which are likely to be of great importance in Brazil in the near future, I also see southern Brazil as having a special responsibility in relation to the rest of the country.The northern, north-western and central-western regions are likely to follow the southernmost region in this problem reversal a few generations later.To make a generation of young academics at universities in the southern states Rio Grande do Sul and Paraná aware of this development, and to have them reflect upon it today, was the goal and purpose of a postgraduate course on "extended lifetimes" in Curitiba and Porto Alegre.

Long-term Perspectives and Theoretical
Framework of a European Historian Figure 4 summarizes in a very simplified and schematic form my own research during, roughly, the last twelve years and the theory I have derived from it.In this period I have been able, with a number of research teams, to perform computer analyses of data on the birth, marriage, migration and death of tens of thousands of persons from parish registers from all over Germany.Although isolated parish registers go back to the sixteenth century, uninterrupted soucre material for large areas is only available for the last 300 hundred years, All the segmental figures on the left are related to this earlier period, that is around 1680, those on the right are for "today", symbolized by the year 1980.
The individual lines in both graphical segments at the top represent life courses "earlier" and "today".Since only adults, as was mentioned earlier, actively confront the problem of adopting a life plan, a goal in life and with that deciding what form their lives are to take, I have chosen to consider only persons who survived at least until their twenty-fifth birthdays, Three hundred years ago that was about half of every birth cohort in Europe.On the left there is greater discrepancy in the individual life course lines and there are, therefore, a larger number of gaps.On the right, by contrast, only one of these lines is missing.Most people live until their twenty-fifth birthdays today (for men 1982/84 the figure was 97.2%, for women 98.3%; Statistisches Bundesamt 40 , 1986: 76).
Yet even those who "earlier" survived the dangerous infant and early childhood years and lived to become adults were not as sure of the rest of their lives.One died at age thirty-five during a typhus epidemic, a mother of twenty-eight in chidbirth, and another at age fifty of the plague.Others, however, survived all of these dangers and lived to be eighty-five or ninety years old.Life, even adult life, was uncertain."In the middle of our lives / death is all around us" was a common saying in those days.In the meantime, life has become more certain for the young as well as for the old, certain to an incomparable extent.Three-quarters of all twenty-five year-old men today live to be sixty-five (75.8%), for women the figure is as high as nine-tenths (87.6%;Statistisches Bundesamt 40 , 1986: 76).Only a few die "prematurely".
The two segmental figures in the middle illustrate the cause of this deep-seated change.
Our forefathers prayed the All Souls Litany "Lord preserve us from plague, hunger and war!", which was an appropriate expression of the helplessness in the face of the omnipresent danger of the deadly troika with which they were confronted "Plague" meant all forms of "pestilence", i.e. epidemic infectious diseases (plague, typhus, typhoid fever, smallpox, malaria, and in the nineteenth century cholera asiatica, etc.)."Hunger" was related to the catastrophic effects which recurrent bad harvests had on people and animals."Wars" did not lead to the death of a great number of people as a result of direct military activity, since armies were relatively small.The greatest number of people died as a result of indirect causes, the tremendous damage caused by war: the frequent marches through a territory, the obligation to quarter soldiers and the comandeering of food.The troops also tended to spread infectious diseases along with them, particularly typhus which was transmitted by the lice likely to be found in dirty uniforms.
The methods our forefathers had for defending themselves against "plague, hunger and war" were quite imperfect and could not provide an entire population with effective protection.Quarantines were often subverted for economic reasons.The few grain reserves that existed were intended for use by the military.Fleeing from "plague, hunger and war" and settling in another location for an adequate period of time was only possible for a very few wealthy individuals.On the whole, it was not particularly difficult for the deadly arrows of the troika to penetrate this imperfect line of defence striking individuals at any place and at any time.
Today, on the other hand, these arrows have become dull or need a much longer time in order to penetrate the much more effective belt of protection which surrounds us, everyone of us.A correspondingly low number of people die "prematurely".On the contrary, ever more people are able to live out an ever greater part of the life span which nature intended for human beings.The average age of death has risen so far and the individual age at death has become so standardized that most of us today can count on living seventy or eighty years.
Of course we know, particularly the historian knows, that our present situation is fragile.It is true that at the moment we have, and have had for the last three or four decades in Europe, neither notable "pestilences", nor hunger nor war.That does not, however, mean that this situation is guaranteed for the future.We have to actively contribute to this ourselves.Yet quite a few Europeans, not the least of which are to be found among the young, are subject in the meantime to a diffuse Angst (anxiety) where our forefathers dealt with a concrete fear of "plague, hunger and war": Angst in relation to new infectious diseases (AIDS!), Angst in relation to poison in our food and the destruction of our environment by pesticides, insecticides, herbicides, forms of energy production which are no longer under control, Angst in relation to an arms race that could end in a catastrophe.Dealing with this diffuse sort of Angst is much more difficult than coming to terms with concrete fear.We by no means live in paradise, even if we no longer have the old problems of "plague, hunger and war".The new ones are not smaller or easier to solve.-How did our forefathers come to terms with their problems?Above all, how did they come to terms with the big problem of the permanent uncertainty of their lives?The lower segmental figures give an answer to these questions.
Since our forefathers were also not able to do without stability in life, and their own lives were just as uncertain as every other, they drew their consequences and did not place any given individual at the center of their thoughts and actions, not even their own EGOs.The center of their world and their Weltanschauung was a value which offered greater stability over a longer period of time.The EGO put itself at the service of this value for the shorter or longer period of time that it was allowed to spend on earth.The center of stability was therefore surrounded by many EGOs with life lines of very different lengths.In actual practice, this center of stability could take on very different forms.In agricultural societies, in which almost all of our forefathers found themselves, the farm played an important role, its unimpaired reputation, its prestige and its welfare.It was the superordinate value which was handed down from generation to generation and in the service of which everyone who lived there placed their lives for as long as they lasted.Everyone belonged to a farm Gemeinschaft, which could not eliminate the uncertainty of individual life spans, but which could mitigate it.Under urban conditions a guild could have been this sort of Gemeinschaft and the center of stability could have been a knowledge of trade secrets.Or one could imagine an artist's circle or the inhabitants of a convent as this sort of Gemeinschaft, whose members each in their own way orientated their thinking and behavior around a certain central thought, a superordinated, endurable -in accordance with their own ideas immortal -value.Becoming part of such a Gemeinschaft which served a system of superordinate values, to integrate or subordinate oneself within it was necessary at that time for physical survival.
In the meantime these permanent elements of uncertainty "plague, hunger and war" have, for the most part, disappeared from the European scene and the presure to live in closeknit Gemeinschaften has been reduced.We no longer need those "bad old communities", with their tight restraints upon the individual, in order to survive physically.The many years we have on earth are guaranteed to us withuot them.We have therefore liberated ourselves more and more from these cumbersome bonds.They only seemed to restrict our individual freedom in an obsolete manner.To an ever greater extent we place our more certain EGO at the center of our thoughts and actions and seem, to ourselves, to be the center of the world.Our life's goal is self-realization and not the welfare of a superordinate common purpose.The numerous EGOs now live in a relatively impersonal Gesellschaft, in loose ad hoc personal unions with varying participation in this or that interest group, existing alongside each other without having any real relationships to one another (the terms Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft with exactly these meanings were coined by the German sociologist Ferdnand Tönnies (1855-1936); (Tönnies 44 , 1887(Tönnies 44 , /1972), Realizing our full potential is all the easier since most of us are able to afford to make use of the widely available range of goods and services which society offers.The middle class has become very large in Europe.Social services tend to negate the differences between the rich and the poor.Women receive an education equivalent to that of men.In addition to the formerly available roles of only-housewives or mothers they find real alternatives.It seems more and more that human beings are indeed not the "social animals" which they were considered to be up until a short time ago.They only behaved as such for as long as they were forced to by the unfortunate conditions of "plague, hunger and war".As soon as these existential threats began to be diminished they began to show themselves more and more as independent single beings.In Table 2 I have collected some data for the Federal Republic of Germany which impressively document this development during the last two or three decades.
At the very top one sees again how the certainty of our life spans has increased even further and how the proportion of people over sixty-five has also continued to increase.The decrease in the number of marriages and the increase in the number of divorces is just as clear.The divorced wait longer and longer before re-marrying, if indeed they to at all.During the same period of time the number of births sank, whether as a result of the lower number of children per family or as a result of the numerous marriages in which no children were born.The result is that the mean household size has continually become smaller.Particularly the number of one-person households has increased.In 1960 every fifth household was composed of one person (20.6%), by 1970 it was every fourth (25.1%) and in 1982 every third (31.3%).In large cities conditions are even more extreme.In Hamburg 40.6% of all households were composed of only one person in 1982, in Berlin (West) the corresponding figure was 52.3%.More than half of all households in Berlin (West) are one-person households, whether as a result of divorce or the death of a spouse, or because the inhabitants have either not yet married or will never marry.
Single persons are, in principle, infertile.For years the number of births in the Federal Republic has been insufficient to make up for the number of deaths.The population has been declining.We are faced not with a population explosion but with a population implosion; not the propagation of birth control but just the opposite, the encouragement of more births -in case that is what we really want.Politicians, particularly those responsible for the family, seem to want this.The long-term historical perspective, as I have just shown, might serve to teach us that their ad hoc measures, which usually only amount to financial manipulation, are not far-reaching enough to be able to put a stop to -let alone reverse -a trend towards living as single beings which has been underway for such a long time.All the figures presented seem to indicate that we are less and less willing to enter into long-term ties and responsibilities, whether with a partner or with a child.The increasing number of "group living arrangements" or of "marriages without a license" do not refute these findings.In these cases we are by no means dealing with Gemeinschaften of the traditional type described above.They are not a consequence of survival strategies, but rather also serve the purpose of more self-realization, more personal enjoyment, more personal satisfaction.
Hence, the politicians' appeals for "more family", "back to the family" and "more children" will only find resonance among a very few of our contemporaries.It will not be possible to influence the trend towards life as single beings in the long run by means of simple financial motivation or tax disadvantages.Only very few convinced single men or women are likely to establish a family and have children only because one-person households might be threatened with higher taxes.It is just as unlikely that very many women will be willing to have more children, or to have children at all, because more numerous day care centers and an additional vacation year are promised.This deep-seated change from an uncertain to a certain life span which has taken place over the course of the last three centuries has freed the individual from the centuries-old pressure to build Gemeinschaften and has set him free in a way that can not be reversed by superficial administrative measures.
The Brazilian Facts Within this Framework I have described the deep-seated change from an uncertain to a certain lifetime in such detail and outlined the effects it has on our living together so drastically in order to encourage Brazilians, who seem to be moving in the same direction, to start thinking about it now.In case they want to try and influence this development which is becoming noticeable there as well, it is likely to be easier now than it will be when they have arrived at the same point were Europe finds itself at present.Far be it from me to claim that the trend to a growing number of single beings is only a result of the increase in life expectancy, that is a life that has become certain for everyone and caused the Gemeinschaften which were formerly necessary for survival to become superfluous.The continual transfer of traditional family functions to superordinate institutions (such as kindergartens, public schools, hospitals, retirement plans, homes for the aged) played, of course, just as important a role as the better education of women to the extent that they more often become fully qualified for professions, or the existence of a large middle class, mentioned above.Nevertheless, the transition from an uncertain to a certain lifetime undoubtedly belongs inseparably and constitutively to this complex and, therefore, to the area of public health as well, in the competence of which it for the most part falls.Table 3 is meant to encourage its readers in reflecting upon this topic.
It would be presumptuous for me, as a foreigner, to claim to competently interpret the statistics.Not only are they related to a much shorter period of time than those for the Federal Republic presented in Table 2, one must also take the fact into consideration that Brazil is just not the Federal Republic.Similar tendencies may very well be the result of different causes.Still, an historian is confronted with a series of factors in Brazil which have played a role for a longer period of time in Europe and which rapidly accelerated the tendency towards single living at an earlier time there.I think, in this context, of increased urbanization, particularly a growing over-metropolitanization, in which Tönnies saw one of the basic elements of the transition from living together in Gemeinschaften toward living alongside each other in Gesellschaften (Tönnies 44 , 1887/1972; cf.Table 4).Another important aspect is the growing literacy of the population, particularly the increased ability to read on the part of younger women (Table 5a and 5b).As a result of this new worlds are opened to them causing them to be more independent in many areas of everyday life (EDUCAR 7 , 1986, EDUCAR 6 , 1986, Goody e Watt 15 , 1975, Graff 16 , 1981, Kramer 20 , 1986).The growing integration of women into the labor market is part of the same complex, even when this happens against their will.With the drying up of the labor market for men and a simultaneous loss in the buying power of the "salário mínimo" it seems that many families see themselves with no other choice in the matter of women going out to work (Table 6).Even if they earn only very little, they still earn their own money.For a European historian it is hard to imagine that the increasing rate of general literacy among Brazilian women and their growing integration into the labor market with their own sources of income will not lead to an increasing awareness of their own value as well, and with that to growing self-reliance and independence as was so obvious in Europe in the wake of increased industrialization and literacy in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.Perhaps higher rates of divorce and separation documented in Table 3, particularly cases in which there was no mutual agreement and where they were sought by the female partners, are to be seen against this background?Not to mention the reduction in the number of births!To give birth to a child or not is, after all, a woman's decision.Brazilian readers will undoubtedly be able to interpret the data collected in Tables 4 to 6 more correctly than I am able to as a foreign observer (Mundigo 29 , 1986, Fundação SEADE 35 , 1982).It was only important to me here to point up possible tendencies, possible developments, possible causes and possible con-nections.On the basis of my own experience as a European historian I could not help be noticing them while I was in Brazil.For this reason I have placed them in the spotlight here and would like to vigorously encourage reflection upon them.This is, in any case, what I saw as my job in Porto Alegre and Curitiba.The indicators seem obvious enough to me that one should confront them, and if necessary, react to them.Those active in the field of public health are called upon to a greater extent than others since their work is so closely connected to the questions of life expectancy, epidemiological transition, certainty of physiological life and age at death.Even if one is confronted with far more pragmatic, immediate and concrete problems in everyday practice, one should now and again try to rectify what one is doing in the hight of longterm effects it may have.