Sífi lis congênita : evento sentinela da qualidade da assistência pré-natal Congenital syphilis : a sentinel event in antenatal care quality

MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal representativo para as gestantes de baixo risco atendidas em unid ades de saúde do município do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, período de 2007 a 2008. A identifi cação de gestantes com diagnóstico de sífi lis na gestação foi feita por meio de entrevistas, verifi cação do cartão de pré-natal e busca de casos notifi cados em sistemas públicos de informação em saúde. Os casos de sífi lis congênita foram identifi cados por meio de busca nos sistemas de informação em saúde: Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notifi cação (Sinan), Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade (SIM) e Sistema de Informações Hospitalares (SIH) do SUS.

Congenital syphilis is an avoidable disease.Routine antenatal care practices are effective in preventing cases. 1,2,4Deaths due to congenital syphilis in infants under fi ve are considered avoidable with care resources available in the SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System). 7It is a sentinel event, 9 as it can be avoided through effective health care, and retrospective investigation of cases is obligatory in order to obtain information about the care provided and propose appropriate measures to be taken. 5 the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, despite the efforts which have been made to control congenital syphilis since the late 1990s, a high incidence of cases and serious forms of the disease persist.a Data from monitoring syphilis in pregnancy from 1999 to 2004 show defi ciencies in antenatal care, such as problems carrying out the screening exam (VDRL), in appropriate treatment for pregnant women and principally in treatment for their sexual partners. 13e aim of this study was to evaluate antenatal care in preventing vertical transmission of syphilis.

METHODS
Cross-sectional study b of 2,422 pregnant women receiving antenatal care in SUS health care units in the city of Rio de Janeiro between 2007 and 2008.
Cluster sampling was carried out in two stages.In the fi rst stage, health centers providing antenatal care to low risk pregnancies were selected, and in the second stage the pregnant women attending the selected health centers were selected.
The health care centers provided were stratified according to their type: primary healthcare centers, hospitals/maternity hospitals, birthing centers and family health centers.
Simple random selection of eligible units for the hospitals/maternity hospitals and primary healthcare centers was carried out in the ten program areas (PAs) of the city.The same proportional distribution was kept in the sample as was found in the city itself at the time of the study.The only birthing centers which exists in the city was included in the study.
The family health centers were selected using a different sampling system, and the units chosen were those in the areas of greatest expansion of family health strategy which best met certain criteria established for the research (not being located in an area with a high risk of violence, having a larger number of teams and having been established for longer).
The size of the sample was established considering the outcome "adequacy of prenatal care", estimated to be 50.0%and the level of signifi cance to be 5.0%.A bilateral error margin of 2.5% for the primary healthcare centers, hospitals/maternity hospitals and the birthing center and 5.2% for the family health centers was set.Finite population correction and correction for design effect, estimated as 1.5, was carried out, with a fi nal sample of 2, 187 women in the primary healthcare centers, hospitals/maternity hospitals and birthing center and 230 interviews in the family health centers.As the few refusals to participate (fewer than 5.0%) were replaced, the estimated size was achieved and 2,422 pregnant women were interviewed.
Any pregnant woman seen in the selected units was eligible to participate, regardless of age, place of residence or stage of pregnancy.
The pregnant women were interviewed and data taken from their antenatal care cards.A standardized questionnaire was used and data collection was carried out by previously trained health care professionals and students, under the supervision of the researchers, in the health care centers themselves.The cards were copied and the relevant data extracted later by a group of higher level professionals with experience in antenatal care.
The instruments were evaluated and pre-tested in the pilot study.The fi eld work took place between November 2007 and July 2008.
The questionnaires were revised and codified by members of the team and the data stored using the Access program, with the questionnaires entered twice and errors corrected until 100% agreement was obtained.
The quality of antenatal care in order to reduce vertical transmission of syphilis was assessed through looking for cases of congenital syphilis and syphilis in pregnant women in the offi cial information systems: Sinam (Information System for Notifi able Diseases), the SIM (mortality information system) and the SUS's SIH (hospitalization information system).Searching the information systems allowed the evaluation of their coverage in relation to the health problems: "syphilis in pregnancy" and "congenital syphilis".
In Sinam, cases of syphilis in pregnancy between 2007 and 2009 were sought.
In Sinam, SIM and SIH the search was for cases of congenital syphilis.Reported cases of early congenital syphilis from 2007 to 2009 were selected in Sinam.In SIM, fetal and non-fetal deaths between 2007 and 2009, with syphilis classifi ed as the cause or associated cause, with ICD-10 (International Classifi cation of Diseases) codes varying between A50.0 and A50.9, were selected.In the SIH, cases of hospitalizations or deaths with ICD-10 codes A50.0 to A50.9 as the main or secondary diagnosis/cause and hospitalizations for miscarriages were selected.This search was restricted to 2008 and 2009 as it was not possible to obtain the data for 2007.
The searches in the information systems for cases of syphilis in pregnancy and congenital syphilis were carried using the RECLINK 3 program and the key variable was the name of the pregnant woman interviewed.
The following data were used to aid in identifying the cases correctly: date of birth and/or age, address, due date, date of outcome (delivery or miscarriage) and date reported (in cases of syphilis in pregnancy).Cases were excluded if there was some doubt as to the woman's identity, either because of differences in name, age and/or address, or discrepancies between the outcome date and/or the reporting date and the date on which the woman participated in the study.
A case was considered to be syphilis in pregnancy when: a) the pregnant woman's antenatal care card had a "reactive" result recorded at the time of the interview, except in cases when this referred to a previous bout of syphilis which had been properly treated; b) the pregnant woman reported in the interview that she had been diagnosed with syphilis and the care card did not have a record of this test result; c) the pregnant woman was identifi ed in Sinam as being diagnosed with syphilis and d) the woman's pregnancy outcome was a case of "congenital syphilis", identifi ed in any of the information systems consulted.
Cases of congenital syphilis were defi ned as all pregnancy outcomes (miscarriage, stillbirth or live birth) identifi ed by any of the information systems (SIM, Sinam or SIH) as "early congenital syphilis".
The Sinasc (information system for live births) was also searched for all cases of "early congenital syphilis" in live births, in order to obtain birth weight and gestational age at birth, as these data were not available on Sinam records.In cases of stillbirth, this data was obtained through SIM itself.
The cases identifi ed in interviews and in each information system were compared and Sinam's coverage was calculated for cases of syphilis in pregnancy and the coverage of Sinam, SIM and SIH for cases of "congenital syphilis".
The prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy, the incidence of congenital syphilis and the rate of vertical transmission were calculated based on the cases identifi ed.
The prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy and the ratio of prevalence were calculated according to demographic, socio-economic and reproductive characteristics and according to access to health care services Women who were unaware of their diagnosis were excluded from this analysis.
Each element of the sample was weighted by the inverse of its probability of selection and was calibrated in order to restore the known distribution of antenatal consultations in the statistical analysis.The birthing center was included in the family health center strata as it has similar characteristics and to allow the inclusion of design effect. 14sed on the information obtained from the interviews and the various systems, the care pathways of those women whose pregnancy outcome was identifi ed as a case of "early congenital syphilis" were described and defi ciencies in any of the procedures recommended by the Ministry of Health in preventing vertical transmission of syphilis c identifi ed.This project was approved by the ENSP/Fiocruz Ethical Research Committee (Report n o 142/06).The data were collected after consent forms had been signed.Every care was taken to ensure the confi dentiality of the data.

RESULTS
There were forty six pregnant women identifi ed as having syphilis and 16 cases of pregnancy outcomes of congenital syphilis.
Of the 46 pregnant women with syphilis, 34 were identifi ed in the interview (29 through the data on their antenatal care cards and in fi ve cases the woman herself reported it) and 12 identifi ed through searches in the information systems.
All of the cases of congenital syphilis were identifi ed through the information systems: 14 in Sinam, two in SIM and seven in SIH.Two cases identifi ed in Sinam were not included in the sample as there were insuffi cient data to enable a classifi cation of congenital syphilis.One case identifi ed in SIH, a hospitalization for a miscarriage, was classifi ed as a case of congenital syphilis, although there was no record of ICD for syphilis, as the woman's care had begun less than 30 days before the outcome c (Tables 1 and 2).
Sinam coverage for cases of syphilis in pregnancy was 23.9%, and 75.0% for congenital syphilis.One serious case of fetal death was not found in Sinam, nor were three cases of hospitalization for congenital syphilis, located in the SIH, one being a miscarriage.The two cases of congenital syphilis which resulted in death were registered in SIM.In SIH, eight cases were identifi ed (53.3%), counting the miscarriage which was not recorded as syphilis and excluding the case of fetal death.The prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy was 1.9% (95%CI 1.3;2.6).
Higher prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy was observed in women with black skin, from less well-off backgrounds and lower levels of education, those who had an obstetric history of risk, those who received antenatal care in primary healthcare centers, those whose antenatal care started later and who had an inadequate number of appointments (Table 3).
The incidence of congenital syphilis was six per 1,000 (95%CI 3;12 per 1,000) and the rate of vertical transmission was 34.8%.
Of the 16 cases of congenital syphilis, three were serious forms of the disease: one miscarriage, one stillbirth and one premature neonatal death.Four newborns were asymptomatic at birth and in seven cases there were no records of clinical diagnosis or of signs or symptoms of the illness in their records or in the AIH (Hospitalization Authorization).
Gestational age was available in the Sinasc and the SIM for 14 cases: 14.3% were premature and 20.0% had low birth weight.
It was not possible to reconstruct the care pathway of one pregnant woman who did not present a diagnosis of syphilis at the time of the interview and whose baby was identifi ed in the SIH, which contained no data on antenatal care.
Of the 15 care pathways analyzed, fi ve of the pregnant women had started receiving antenatal care late and fi ve had moved health care center during antenatal care.
Four of the women had not had an adequate number of appointments up to the time of the interview, all of them having started receiving antenatal care late.
Thirteen women reported the request of the fi rst VDRL test and, of the nine who were in the third trimester, four reported the request of the second test.
Nine of the women presented a diagnosis of syphilis in pregnancy, four received this diagnosis when admitted for the birth and this information was not available for two of the women.Some discrepancies were observed between what was reported by the women and the data registered on the care card: four women who did not know the VDRL test result or who reported a non-reactive result, presented a "reactive" result on their card: one woman who reported testing positive had no result registered on her card.Of the nine women diagnosed with syphilis in pregnancy, information on the clinical form of the disease was available for one of them.For four woman recorded as having syphilis in pregnancy in Sinam (which contained a fi eld for this information), the clinical form recorded was 'unknown'.
There was information on prescribed treatment for six of the women.In the only case in which the clinical form was recorded, the treatment prescribed was not appropriate, being of incorrect dosage.In two other cases, treatment started fewer than 30 days before the birth or miscarriage.Discrepancies were identifi ed in relation to the women's treatment in three cases, with the congenital syphilis investigation generally indicating defi ciencies in how it was carried out.
Of the three women aware of their diagnosis of syphilis in pregnancy at the time of the interview, two reported having been given information about the risks to the baby and on the use of condoms and one reported the request for a VDRL test for her sexual partner.
There were no records of treatment for the partner in the pregnancy and birth records.Three of the women no longer lived with their partners, in seven cases there was a record that treatment was not carried out and in fi ve cases there was no record of this information.
Table 4 and the Figure show a summary of the care pathway of these 15 women whose pregnancies resulted in cases of congenital syphilis and the missed opportunities due to not following the recommended care protocol.

DISCUSSION
The prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy (1.9%) was lower than that reported by Leal et al 6 (2.4%) in their 1999-2000 study carried out in public health service maternity hospitals in Rio de Janeiro.It was also lower than that found in the data from epidemiological monitoring between 1999 and 2004, during which the rate presented fell from 4.7% to 2.8% 13 It is, however, similar to that observed in a study carried out in maternity hospitals registered in the National Program for STD/AIDS in 1999-2000 (1.7%) 8 and to the results of a sentinel study carried out in 2004 (1.6%).d The data found suggest the prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy in Rio de Ja neiro is declining, growing closer to values observed in other parts of the country.Increasing work on preventing STDs/AIDS and greater access to treatment for syphilis may be possible explanations for the data observed.
The incidence of congenital syphilis (6/1,000 births) is high and is six times higher than the Ministry of Health's goal to eliminate the disease.e The rate of transmission found, higher than 30%; the serious form of the disease in cases of congenital Women who received advice on using condoms (2)   Women with prescription for treatment in pregnancy (6)   Women who received advice on the risks of syphilis (2) Test requested for partner (1)   Partners who received treatment (0) syphilis, with three cases proving fatal and the high levels of premature births and low birth weight; allied to the defi ciencies in care observed, such as starting antenatal care late, breaks in the continuity of the care due to changing health care centers, diffi culties in diagnosing syphilis in pregnancy (absent in 25% of the congenital syphilis cases), defi ciencies in treatment and, especially in treatment for sexual partners, and lack of counselling and information about the disease and about using condoms, indicate that the quality and effectiveness of antenatal care in reducing vertical transmission is low.It is noteworthy that the number of newborns born premature or with low birth weights was much higher than that observed in a set of newborns born in the city of RJ in 2007, with values of 8.9% and 9.7% respectively.f,g The lack of counselling resulted in some women not even knowing the results of the test, even those women with positive results.Syphilis requires treatment by injection, changes in behavior and a series of tests to control the cure, which may well culminate in the woman not following the treatment, especially if she is unaware of what disease she has.
Studies carried out in other contexts indicate defi ciencies in managing cases of syphilis in pregnancy, with the majority of cases of congenital syphilis considered to be avoidable. 15However, cases which are unavoidable regardless of the good antenatal care provided by health care professionals, due to treatment failure, delayed infection or reinfection, 15 were reported, something which was not observed in this study.
After the 1999/2000 campaign to eliminate syphilis in the city of Rio de Janeiro, there was a 29% reduction in the number of deaths from congenital syphilis in 2000 and 2001, explained by the effects of the campaign. 11owever, the following years saw a return to the previous situation with an annual incidence of above 10/1,000 between 2004 and 2006 a and perinatal deaths due to congenital syphilis at a steady rate of 1/1,000.Similar data were found in this study, showing that the epidemiological situation of congenital syphilis was practically unaltered in the last few years.
Although syphilis is a disease for which simple and low cost diagnostic and therapeutic resources exist, controlling it in pregnancy has proven to be a challenge for health professionals and managers.This is because of the limited interval of the pregnancy in which to carry out diagnosis and treatment; to the diffi culty of approaching sexually transmitted diseases, especially during pregnancy; and probably due to the lack of awareness on the part of both the population and health professionals of the magnitude of this health problem and the damage it can cause to the health of mother and child.
The fact that the highest prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy was found in women from poor socio-economic conditions, those with an obstetric history of risk and those with worse access to health services highlights the greater social and reproductive vulnerability of these women, results also found in other studies, 8,10,11,15 and which make the challenge of controlling syphilis in this population more complex.
The attempt to reconstruct the care pathways of the women diagnosed with syphilis in pregnancy based on the data of a cross-sectional study and from data sought in the SUS information systems is a limitation of this study.By their very nature, cross-sectional studies capture the information available at the moment in which the research is carried out.Interviewing women at the start of their pregnancies may have led to the loss of important data on antenatal care.On the other hand, the records in the information systems consulted did not contain all of the data relevant to the objective of this study, as well as the quality with which they were fi lled out varying, often being incomplete, as has been described in previous studies. 10,12e limits for calculating the prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy and the incidence of congenital syphilis are related to problems in the coverage of the information systems, SIH being the system which performed worst for congenital syphilis.Moreover, it was not possible to obtain SIH data for 2007, which may have meant the loss of cases of congenital syphilis not reported in other systems for this year.The criteria used to identify cases, excluding any in which a doubt existed, may also have resulted in the search being less sensitive.For these reasons, the results should be viewed as conservative, the possibility exists that they underestimate the true seriousness of the situation of incidence of congenital syphilis, rate of vertical transmission and cases of death found.
Innovative strategies are necessary to: ensure pregnant women are caught early so antenatal care can begin in the fi rst trimester; guarantee diagnosis of the disease during the pregnancy as early as possible, so treatment can begin before the 24 th -28 th week, when it is most effective for the fetus; 2 and the adequate clinical management of the woman and her sexual partner(s), including counselling and information on the disease and forms of prevention.Thus, treatment may be more likely to be followed and the vulnerability of the women and their partners to this STD reduced.

EDITOR'S COMMENT
Correctly diagnosed and treated, congenital syphilis is an avoidable condition.The persistently high incidence of the disease and the high rates of vertical transmission, even after the considerable increase in coverage of antenatal care and average number of appointments with the establishment of the SUS, indicate the unsatisfactory quality of care.
This study presents useful data for orienting initiatives by health care professionals and managers aimed at improving quality and eliminating congenital syphilis.
Syphilis in pregnancy is associated with skin color, low levels of education, poor socio-economic conditions, obstetric history of risk, starting to receive antenatal care late and an insuffi cient number of appointments.
Congenital syphilis is associated with inadequate care management, with missed opportunities for both diagnosis and treatment, lack of advice and counselling, lack of treatment for sexual partners and incorrect treatment of diagnosed cases.
The study shows the need for an urgent revision of the procedures adopted and health care professionals taking more responsibility for an avoidable problem.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Care pathway of the 15 pregnant women with cases of congenital syphilis as their pregnancy outcomes.Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, 2007-2008.

Table 1 .
Identifi ed cases of syphilis in pregnancy according to source of information.Rio de Janeiro, SoutheasternBrazil,  2007-2008.
a Data from Sinam SP, Sinam CS and SIM for 2007 to 2009 b Data from SIH (CS and miscarriage) for 2008 and 2009

Table 2 .
Cases of congenital syphilis according to sources of information.Rio de Janeiro, SoutheasternBrazil, 2007-2008.

Table 3 .
Prevalence of syphilis in pregnancy and ratio of prevalence according to demographic, socio-economic and reproductive characteristics and access to health care for the pregnant women interviewed.aRio de Janeiro, SoutheasternBrazil, 2007-2008.
a Excluding women unaware of their diagnosis of syphilis b Economic classifi cation according to the Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa.Criteria of Economic Classifi cation, Brazil.São Paulo; s.d [cited 2010 Jun 30].Available from: http://www.abep.org/novo/Content.aspx?ContentID=302) c Only for women with prior pregnancies.Obstetric history of risk = any of the following: three or more miscarriages, four or more births, two or more cesareans, obstetric complications (high blood pressure, gestational diabetes) or negative outcomes (stillbirth, neonatal deaths, premature, low birth weight) d Early start =starting antenatal care before 16th week e Adequate number of appointments = at least one in the fi rst trimester, two in the second and three in the third

Table 4 .
Data on antenatal care and managing syphilis in pregnancy of women whose pregnancy outcomes were recorded as cases of congenital syphilis.Rio de Janeiro, SoutheasternBrazil,  2007-2008.
GA: gestational age; ANC: antenatal care; VDRL: Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; na: not applicable (request for 2º VDRL in women less than 28 weeks pregnant or prescription for partner in women who reported not having a partner); nd: not done; LW: low birth weight (< 2,500 g); PMT: premature (gestational age < 37weeks); diag.birth:diagnosis of syphilis at time of birth a 1: data from research; 2: Sinam syphilis in pregnancy; 3: Sinam congenital syphilis; 4: SIM; 5: SIH b Adequate treatment recorded on antenatal care card.Inadequate treatment recorded in the congenital syphilis investigation record c Woman denied being prescribed treatment in interview; record of adequate treatment prescribed in the report of syphilis in pregnancy on the same day as the interview; congenital syphilis investigation recorded unaware of treatment d Treatment completed according to antenatal care card and report of syphilis in pregnancy; treatment not carried out according to congenital syphilis investigation Secretaria Municipal de Saúde e Defesa Civil.Nascidos vivos no município do Rio de Janeiro, segundo estabelecimento e duração de gestação.Rio de Janeiro; 2007 [cited 2012 Jun 20].Available from: http://200.141.78.79/dlstatic/10112/1351630/DLFE-213926.pdf/gestacao2007.pdfg Secretaria Municipal de Saúde e Defesa Civil.Nascidos vivos no município do Rio de Janeiro, segundo estabelecimento e peso ao nascer.Rio de Janeiro; 2007 [cited 2012 Jun 20].Available from: http://200.141.78.79/dlstatic/10112/1351630/DLFE-213929.pdf/peso2007.pdf2007 f