Uso de medicamentos por pessoas com deficiências em áreas do estado de São Paulo

OBJETIVO: Analisar o consumo de medicamentos e os principais grupos terapeuticos consumidos por pessoas com deficiencias fisicas, auditivas ou visuais. METODOS: Estudo transversal em que foram analisados dados do Inquerito Multicentrico de Saude no Estado de Sao Paulo (ISA-SP) em 2002 e do Inquerito de Saude no Municipio de Sao Paulo (ISA-Capital), realizado em 2003. Os entrevistados que referiram deficiencias foram estudados segundo as variaveis que compoem o banco de dados: area, sexo, renda, faixa etaria, raca, consumo de medicamentos e tipos de medicamentos consumidos. RESULTADOS: A percentagem de consumo entre as pessoas com deficiencia foi de: 62,8% entre os visuais; 60,2% entre os auditivos e 70,1% entre os fisicos. As pessoas com deficiencia fisica consumiram 20% mais medicamentos que os nao-deficientes. Entre as pessoas com deficiencia visual, os medicamentos mais consumidos foram os diureticos, agentes do sistema renina-angiotensina e analgesicos. Pessoas com deficiencia auditiva utilizaram mais analgesicos e agentes do sistema renina-angiotensina. Entre individuos com deficiencia fisica, analgesicos, antitromboticos e agentes do sistema renina-angiotensina foram os medicamentos mais consumidos. CONCLUSOES: Houve maior consumo de medicamentos entre as pessoas com deficiencias quando comparados com os nao-deficientes, sendo os individuos com deficiencia fisica os que mais consumiram farmacos, seguidos de deficientes visuais e auditivos.


INTRODUCTION
A medicine, according to the Brazilian Ministry of Health, is a pharmaceutical product with a prophylactic, healing, palliative or diagnostic purpose.a In the health-disease process, a medicine plays an important role, both in terms of health system management policies and health professionals involved. 23though the use of medicines to improve the population's health status has been recognized, access to medicines and their benefi ts are unequally distributed among the several layers of society and ethnic groups.b In Brazil, it is estimated that 23% of the population uses 60% of the production and that 64.5 million individuals do not have fi nancial conditions to acquire the required medicines. 20Certain governmental actions aimed at the pharmaceutical assistance sector have been performed to reduce social discrepancies in access to medicines.The Política Nacional de Medicamentos (PNM -Brazilian Policy of Medicines), established in 2001 by the Ministry of Health, aims to guarantee access to essential medicines by the population c and it was structured into three main categories: sanitary regulation, economic regulation and pharmaceutical regulation.This policy appears in an environment of demographic changes in Brazil.Considering the fact that transformations in population patterns lead to qualitative and quantitative changes in use of medicines, the PNM foresees a greater use of certain pharmacological groups, such as medicines used for the treatment of chronic-degenerative diseases and those of continuous use, due to an increase in life expectation.
Another consequence of the demographic transition is the increase in the number of individuals with a certain form of disability, once age is a risk factor for this type of event. 4The prevalences of disabilities in the population vary according to the country or even research methodology; however, prevalences of a certain type of disability were recorded at 110.8‰ in areas of the state of São Paulo, 4 Brazil, and at 126.0‰ in Holland. 18ndividuals with a certain type of disability, whether it be visual, hearing or physical, may have special health needs, due to this disability.Associated with the causes or defi ciencies resulting from them, there are morbid processes that are more easily established or which are an essential part of the process of becoming disabled. 5hese comorbidities require more health care, because they can worsen the disability or decrease quality of life and health of a person with disability, and medicines are an important control aspect.
Despite its having been extensively researched, the question of use of medicines is, most times, indirectly studied from points of sale, thus providing data on the population's search, rather than demand.Populationbased health surveys are more effi cient instruments in the analysis of data on demand, once the information collected is self-reported.Thus, more reliable information about the actual need of individuals can be obtained, even if they do not have access to medicines.a However, population-based studies on use of medicines among persons with disabilities are rare, also due to cost and time factors.
Patterns of use of medicines provide the basis to plan actions in pharmaceutical assistance and to direct health care policies. 22Thus, establishing this pattern for persons with disabilities can contribute to better health pharmacotherapy in this group, improving not only their health, but also their quality of life, which is in accordance with the PNM.
The objective of the present study was to analyze use of medicines and the main therapeutic groups consumed by individuals with physical, hearing and visual disabilities.

METHODS
Two population household health surveys were performed in the cities of Campinas, Botucatu, São Paulo, Itapecerica da Serra, Taboão da Serra and Embu, in Southeastern Brazil.The present study was part of these two health surveys, known as ISA-SP, Inquérito de Saúde no Estado de São Paulo (2002 -State of São Paulo Health Survey), and ISA-Capital, Inquérito de Saúde no Município de São Paulo (2003 -City of São Paulo Health Survey).These surveys performed an extensive health investigation and two of the issues dealt with were the use of medicines and the occurrence of disabilities.
In both surveys, sampling was conducted in two stages.Primary units of sampling were census tracts, while the secondary ones were households.In the sample selection, census tracts were grouped into three strata, considering the percentage of heads of family with higher education: less than 5%; from 5% to 25%; and more than 25%.A total of eight sample domains were defi ned according to gender and age, each with a similar number of interviews: less than one year; one to 11 years; men aged between 12 and 19 years; women between 12 and 19 years; men between 20 and 29 years; women between 20 and 29 years; men aged 60 years and older; and women aged 60 years and older.
The above mentioned surveys had already had preliminary data published in the forms of a summary, released in 2005, d and a website.e Methodological details can be seen in Castro et al, 4 (2008)  Data were collected through household interviews with the selected individuals.Those who self-reported the use of medicines in the last three days were considered users of medicines, this being directly associated with the quality of information reported. 12During the interview, interviewers asked for medicine packages to confi rm the collected information.
Respondents who self-reported any type of visual (low vision, blindness in one eye or total blindness), hearing (hearing loss, unilateral deafness and total deafness), and physical disabilities (paralysis or amputated limbs) were considered persons with disabilities.
The variables analyzed were as follows: use and prescription of medicines, sociodemographic variables (gender, age, ethnic group; income, level of education of head of family, geographic area).Medicines were organized according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classifi cation System. 26evalence ratios were determined based on individuals without a specifi c disability.Poisson regression was used, once the odds ratio can show distortions in studies with events of prevalences smaller than 10%. 1,24Gender, age and level of education variables were maintained in the Poisson regression model for the purpose of adjustment (0.20 signifi cance in the t-test).A signifi cance level of 0.05 (F-statistics) was adopted for the model.
The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, on February 14 th , 2001, under Protocol 381.Research was thoroughly explained to participants and interviews were conducted after they signed an informed consent form.

RESULTS
Table 1 shows the sample description.The total number of individuals interviewed was 8,316 (1,251 disabled ones).Of these, 4,959 were from the ISA-SP survey, distributed as follows: Greater São Paulo Area (GSP), 1,786; Botucatu, 1,588; and Campinas, 1,585.The other 3,357 interviews came from the ISA-Capital survey of the city of São Paulo.The sum of each variable may not correspond to the total number of the sample, due to loss of information.
Analysis of use of medicines showed that 38.9% of the population consumed a certain type of medicine, 30.9% among men and 45.9% among women.In the GSP, 30.6% of all individuals in this area consumed medicines; in the cities of Botucatu, Campinas and São Paulo, 45.7%, 41.2% and 38.9% of the general population consumed them, respectively.
Table 2 shows the use of medicines according to disabilities.The percentage of persons with a visual disability who consumed medicines was 62.8%; among those with a hearing disability, 60.2%; and among persons with a physical disability, 70.1%.After adjustment, the prevalence ratio for use of medicines among persons with a physical disability was higher than that among non-physically disabled ones (aPR = 1.2).
Use of medicines by persons with disabilities is shown in categories in Table 3.There was a greater use among persons with a visual disability in the category of use of two to six medicines (aPR = 1.8) and seven and more medicines (aPR = 3.9).This pattern repeated itself in persons with a physical disability for categories of use of two to six (aPR = 4.9) and seven and more medicines (aPR = 5.7).On the other hand, among those with a hearing disability, prevalence ratios did not maintain their signifi cance level after adjustment.
Considering the therapeutic group of medicines consumed, the pattern of use among persons with disabilities was different between gender and age domains, and also different from that recorded in the total population (Tables 4 and 5).
Agents of the renin-angiotensin system (38.1%) and diuretics (21.2%) were the medicines most frequently used by men with visual disability aged between 20 and 59 years; women with the same type of disability and in the same age group reported a greater use of analgesics (14.2%) and diuretics (10.1%).Among individuals with a visual disability and aged more than 59 years, agents of the renin-angiotensin system (10.8% of men and 8.6% of women) and diuretics (10.6% of men and 10.8% of women) were the most frequently consumed therapeutic groups (Table 4).
Analgesics (26.7%) and agents of the renin-angiotensin system (15.3%)were those most frequently used among males with hearing disability, aged between 20 and 59 years (Table 4).Women in this same age group and with the same disability consumed more analgesics (32.9%), antacids and drugs to treat peptic ulcer and fl atulence (15.4%).Agents of the renin-angiotensin system (13.5% of men and 7.7% of women) and vitamins (7.1% of men and 5.9% of women) were more consumed among persons with a hearing disability aged more than 59 years.In addition, a greater use of psychoanaleptics among women in this same group was found (5.3%).
Male individuals with physical disabilities and aged between 20 and 59 years used more analgesics (27.4%) and systemic antibacterial drugs (20.3%); women in this same age group reported that the medicines most frequently consumed by them were analgesics (16.2%), agents of the renin-angiotensin system (14.6%) and antithrombotics (13.7%).On the other hand, among   men with physical disability aged more than 59 years, the most frequently consumed therapeutic groups were vitamins (17.2%) and analgesics (10.8%); women with physical disability in the same age group reported greater use of agents of the renin-angiotensin system (17.4%) and antithrombotics (14.8%) (Table 5).
Medicines most frequently consumed by the total population are shown in Table 5.Among men in the total population and aged between 20 and 59 years, analgesics (25.0%) and agents of the renin-angiotensin system (10.5%)were the most frequently consumed medicines; among women in the same age group, analgesics (18.6%) and antirheumatic and anti-infl ammatory drugs (7.5%) were those most often reported.Among individuals aged more than 59 years, the most frequently consumed medicines were agents of the renin-angiotensin system (13.0% of men and 10.1% of women) and diuretics (10.7% of men and 10.8% of women).

DISCUSSION
Considering the lack of population-based, cross-sectional studies on use of medicines by individuals with a certain type of disability in the scientifi c literature, comparisons of such use, performed in the present study, will be made with the general population, disregarding the presence or absence of disabilities.
The prevalence of use of medicines in the total population was similar to those found by Sans et al 22 (2002) in a study with the same methodology, in Cataluña, in 2001.The authors found a prevalence of 26% for men and 38% for women.
Bertoldi et al 2 (2004), in a population-based, crosssectional study with a weighted sample, performed in the city of Pelotas, Southern Brazil, reported prevalences of 65.9% in the general population, 49.3% in men and 69.7% in women, contrasting with data found in the present study, which were 38.9%, 30.9% and 45.9% for the general population, men and women, respectively.However, the length of time of use of medicines was 15 days in the study by Bertoldi et al. 2 These authors 2 also showed other prevalences, found by different researchers: a prevalence of 69.9% of use of medicines in adults, when the suggested length of time of use was 30 days; when this length of time was 90 days, prevalence rose to 73.3%.
Loyola Filho et al 14 (2002) obtained a prevalence of use of medicines of 78.2% among female participants aged 18 years, against 21.8% among males, using a three-month recall period in the city of Bambuí, Southeastern Brazil.
With regard to the diversity of recall periods, Pelicioni (2005) a calculates that a long interval of time would reduce respondent's recall of certain medicines used, thus leading to underreporting.Nevertheless, the author considers that, the longer the recall period used, the higher the probability of rarely consumed medicines being reported, which could be particularly important in a study with a reduced sample.The present study, however, is population-based, rendering the adoption of long recall periods unnecessary.As a result, recall of the three days prior to interview was adopted.Moreover, in a multi-center study performed in different countries, Kohn et al (1976), 12 reported that a recall period of approximately two days, used to estimate the prevalence of use of medicines, promoted respondents' recall, resulting in reliable data.
Persons with disabilities used medicines more frequently, when compared to non-disabled ones.This fact could be due to characteristics of the health status of this population, usually more exposed to diseases resulting from age and gender, rather than exclusively the disability itself, thus requiring more health care.
In addition, the chronicity of diseases could lead to a debilitating process and require pharmacological care for those affected.A higher incidence of comorbidities among persons with disabilities is reported in the literature, 11 which could indicate a greater need for pharmaceutical assistance.
Adjustment variables seem to have several infl uences, when the three types of disabilities are considered.Among persons with visual or hearing disabilities, the signifi cance of use of at least one medicine does not remain after adjustment.This fact could indicate that a greater use of medicines in these two populations could be more of a result of other factors (gender, age and level of education) than the disability itself.A different pattern occurs among persons with physical disabilities.In this group, adjustment variables are shown as confounding variables, changing after adjustment to PR (crude PR = 1.6; adjusted PR = 1.2), although without loss of statistical signifi cance.The greater use of medicines among persons with physical disabilities could have resulted from their health status, promoting this greater use due to the comorbidities to which they are exposed. 6This could indicate that a disability or debilitating process in itself may be more closely associated with greater use of medicines.
However, when the number of medicines consumed was analyzed, it is observed that, even after adjustment, the signifi cance remained among persons with a physical or visual disability.It can be inferred from such data that those with physical or visual disabilities tend to consume more types of medicines than non-disabled ones, something that does not occur among those with a hearing disability.
Regardless of the type of disability, higher frequencies of use of medicines were observed from the prescriptions of health professionals.The fact that there is greater use of medicines prescribed by doctors or dentists could indicate greater search for such type of care, emphasizing the idea of implementation of a specifi c health care policy for persons with disabilities.
In general, the group of medicines most frequently used by persons with disabilities were the analgesics, followed by antithrombotics.The greater use of analgesics could be justifi ed by the frequent occurrence of pain among persons with a physical disability. 9,19tudies on the use of analgesics in the general population show different values, according to the country and methodology adopted.In Brazil, use of analgesics was reported by 22% of respondents in a national survey conducted in 2003. 3Use of medicines was reported by 73% of respondents who mentioned pain in fi ve Turkish cities. 16 In a study performed in Norway, 54% of respondents reported consuming analgesics in the 14 days prior to the interview. 8In the United States, the percentage of individuals who use analgesics reach 76%. 17Diuretics also show variable percentages of use in the population, with values of 24.6% and 36.9%being recorded among men and women aged 75 years or more, respectively, in a study performed in the United States. 7A study performed in Holland with hospitalized patients aged 75 years or more observed 37.7% of use of diuretics. 25Population data on the use of antithrombotics or agents of the renin-angiotensin system were not found for this discussion.
The use of antithrombotics is the recommended therapy to decrease the chances of recurrent thromboembolic accidents, whose frequency increases with the immobility that may be caused by the disability.The agents of the renin-angiotensin system were the third most frequently used group of medicines.
There was greater use of diuretics among persons with a visual disability.Certain authors point to a possible relationship between use of medicines and possible harmful effects on sight. 13,15The second most frequently used group of medicines were the agents of the reninangiotensin system, followed by analgesics.Agents of the renin-angiotensin system are probably used because of the population's greater longevity and the group of diseases it leads to, once these medicines also play a role in fi ghting hypertension. 21Among persons with a hearing disability, analgesics were the most frequently consumed medicines.The use of agents of the renin-angiotensin system came in second.This use in both groups probably occurs due to the population's greater longevity and the group of diseases it leads to, 23 because such medicines play a role in fi ghting diseases that are typical in the elderly.The use of analgesics is also associated with age, once the threshold of pain changes with age, requiring changes in the therapy with analgesics. 10w frequencies of report of use of medicines in certain domains of age or gender can be a limitation to the study.However, the present cross-sectional study with a representative sample shows data that only refl ect the profi le of the population analyzed.Another possible explanation could be the low occurrence of individuals in certain domains.
The use of medicines among individuals with visual, hearing or physical disabilities was always greater than non-disabled ones.Use of medicines was greater among persons with a physical disability.This greater use could be explained by the health status of such individuals, which often requires greater health care.This care needed by persons with disabilities also includes medicines, which are factors that can contribute to changes in the quality of life of individuals, as their health improves, in addition to probably reducing costs with hospitalizations caused by comorbidities.

Table 1 .
Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the total population studied, according to type of disability.State of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil, 2002-2003.
MW: Minimum wage a Weighted percentages according to the weight attributed in the stratifi ed sampling process, (n) non-weighted frequency.

Table 2 .
Prevalence, crude and adjusted prevalence ratios for use of medicines in the three days prior to the interview, according to type of disability.State of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil, 2002-2003.Weighted percentages, according to the weight attributed in the stratifi ed sampling process.Prevalence ratios adjusted for age, gender and level of education of individuals a b

Table 3 .
Crude and adjusted prevalence ratio of use of medicines among persons with disabilities.State of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil, 2002-2003.
a Cut-off points attributed according to data distribution.b Adjusted for gender, age and level of education of individuals.

Table 4 .
Distribution of percentage of groups of medicines consumed in the three days prior to the interview, according to disabilities and stratifi ed by gender and age.State of São Paulo, SoutheasternBrazil, 2002-2003.
a Domains of gender and age lower than 20 years were not shown in the table as they included records of use of medicines by fewer than 28 individuals.

Table 5 .
Distribution of percentage of groups of medicines consumed in the three days prior to the interview among persons with a physical disability and for the total population, b according to age and gender.State of São Paulo, SoutheasternBrazil,  2002-2003.
a Domains of gender and age lower than 20 years were not shown in the table as they included records of use of medicines by fewer than six individuals.b Individuals with and without disabilities.