Ichthyofauna for amateur fishing in the lakes and rivers of the Igapó Açu and Matupiri RDS. |
No research and monitoring of ichthyofauna. |
Development of the Management Plan with the participation of communities, favoring community organization with a view to supporting and organizing Public Use activities. |
Institutional weakness of the State government for mediation of conflicts, and maintenance of symmetry of power between external agents and the community with regard to sport fishing. |
Community reaction generated by the already disordered sport fishing. |
Incipient state of community organization in the face of current and future pressures from the growth of sportfishing tourism. |
ARPA and DENIT resources for implementing a participatory management plan. |
Generation of expectations regarding the attractiveness of the region that will not be met. |
Igapó forest during the flood season for canoeing, preferably with traditional canoes. |
Absence of security protocols for tourism development in the RDS Igapó Açu. |
International interest to get to know the Amazon. |
Absence of a permanent and clear policy that articulates tourism, nature conservation and social development. |
Knowledge of the population about the elements and dynamics of the local nature that can be presented to visitors. |
Lack of training of local labor for the development of recreational activities with some degree of risk. |
Existence of international organizations interested in supporting sustainable development projects in the Amazon to maintain biodiversity. |
Predominance of external knowledge over community knowledge. |
Participatory, detailed inventory of resources for the development of Public Use. |
Discontinuity in the implementation of the management plan. |
Previous knowledge of visitors about the region, with a view to leisure and tourism activities. |
Potential increase in disordered visitation, due to the proximity of Manaus, considering the imminent paving of BR 319, a policy for the development of tourism in the Amazon. |
Presence of fishing operators |
Asymmetric economic relations between fishing operators and the community. |
Mastery of public use activities by intermediaries linked to the tourist business. |
Hegemony of tourist activities by subjects external to the community. |
Diversity of landscape units |
Territorial extension of UCs with very low demographic density and lack of inspection structure. |
Development of the sense of belonging (environmental education) of the Igapó Açu RDS communities, with the landscape as a source and development of a protection strategy and use of the UCs in an integrated manner. |
Disregard of the dynamics of the region's nature when implementing the highway and tourism support structures. |
Igarapés for bathing; |
Long distance from the urban center (Careiro Castanho) to support tourist activities, hindering inspection and prevention of environmental impacts. |
Implementation of a control and inspection and security system in the RDS. |
Lack of resources to implement the management plan and the resulting public use program. |
Small beaches (in the low season) for camps, picnics and landed fishing; |
Process of emigration of the population due to the lack of social structures such as public health equipment, education and means of communication; |
Elaboration of projects to qualify resources for Public Use; |
Abandonment of the region by the government |
Community agroextractivism in the RDS; |
Poor reception structure in the Igapó Açu RDS and absent in the Matupiri RDS (accommodation, food); |
Valorization of the production of ecological agriculture for the national and international market, making the visitation to the producers an attractive one; |
Overvaluation of agroecological merchandise by the foreign market, leaving the domestic market short of supplies. |
Use of local production to feed visitors; |
Absence of actions aimed at food security |
Paving will make it possible to sell local products and import complementary products from other regions. |
Substitution of local food for outside food |
Unique institutional structure for the three UCs aimed at coordinating Public Use as a strategic management program. |
Restoration of the road without the management plan implemented; |
Optimization of resources for conservation of a wide area |
Insufficient resources to meet the three conservation units that make up the mosaic of local UCs |
Existence of living spaces such as a soccer field and bars in the Igapó Açu Reserve, igarapés and the Igapó Açu River itself. |
Bodies of water along the highway with easy accessibility without any protection; |
Implementation of the management plan as an opportunity to attract resources for basic infrastructure |
Absence of forecast resources for the implementation of basic infrastructure in the community |
Navigation for nature observation on the Igapó Açu River; |
Absence of environmentally compatible technology in the Igapó Açu RDS; |
Traditional technologies like canoes; Presence of INPA researchers can provide answers to local needs |
Insufficient socio-environmental research in support of land management |
Use of traditional knowledge about local nature; |
Absence of fauna and flora inventory that for the guidance of visitation |
International appreciation for sport fishing |
Interest and promotion of illegal sport hunting; Irregular and uncontrolled sport fishing; |
Presence of endemic birdlife; |
Absence of bird fauna inventory |
International interest in bird watching |
Absence of infrastructure for bird watchers |
Mastofauna important and possible to be sighted. Traditional knowledge about the local fauna, habits and places of sighting; |
Absence of infrastructure to support visitation (transport, signaling, accommodation, shelters, communication). |
International events in Brazil that promote the Amazon |
Attraction of tourists without adequate infrastructure |