EDITORIAL Challenges and perspectives in preventing and treating obesity Pajecki, Denis Fernandes, Paulo Manuel Pêgo |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Postorotracheal intubation dysphagia in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study Saconato, Mariana Maselli-Schoueri, Jean Henri Malaque, Ceila Maria Sant’Ana Marcusso, Rosa Maria Oliveira, Augusto César Penalva de Batista, Lucio Antonio Nascimento Ultramari, Graziela Lindoso, José Angelo Lauletta Gonçalves, Maria Inês Rebelo Sztajnbok, Jaques Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The cause of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) can be multifactorial and may underly limitations in swallowing rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the factors related to dysphagia in patients with COVID-19 immediately after orotracheal extubation and the factors that influence swallowing rehabilitation. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective study. METHODS: The presence of dysphagia was evaluated using the American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcome Measurement System (ASHA NOMS) scale and variables that influenced swallowing rehabilitation in 140 adult patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation for >48 h. RESULTS: In total, 46.43% of the patients scored 1 or 2 on the ASHA NOMS (severe dysphagia) and 39.29% scored 4 (single consistency delivered orally) or 5 (exclusive oral diet with adaptations). Both the length of mechanical ventilation and the presence of neurological disorders were associated with lower ASHA NOMS scores (odds ratio [OR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74–0.87 P < 0.05; and OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.61–0.29; P < 0.05, respectively). Age and the presence of tracheostomy were negatively associated with speech rehabilitation (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87–−0.96; OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.80–−0.75), and acute post-COVID-19 kidney injury requiring dialysis and lower scores on the ASHA NOMS were associated with longer time for speech therapy outcomes (β: 1.62, 95% CI, 0.70–3.17, P < 0.001; β: −1.24, 95% CI: −1.55–−0.92; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prolonged orotracheal intubation and post-COVID-19 neurological alterations increase the probability of dysphagia immediately after extubation. Increased age and tracheostomy limited rehabilitation. |
Original Article Combined association of insufficient physical activity and sleep problems with healthcare costs: a longitudinal study Kikuti-Koyama, Kelly Akemi Lemes, Ítalo Ribeiro Morais, Luana Carolina de Monteiro, Henrique Luiz Turi-Lynch, Bruna Camilo Fernandes, Rômulo Araújo Codogno, Jamile Sanches Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The magnitude of economic losses attributed to sleep problems and insufficient physical activity (PA) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between insufficient PA, sleep problems, and direct healthcare costs. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between insufficient physical activity (PA), sleep problems, and direct healthcare costs among adults. DESIGN AND SETTING: Adults aged ≥ 50 years attended by the Brazilian National Health Service were tracked from 2010 to 2014. METHODS: Direct healthcare costs were assessed using medical records and expressed in US$. Insufficient PA and sleep problems were assessed through face-to-face interviews. Differences were identified using the analysis of covariance and variance for repeated measures. RESULTS: In total, 454 women and 166 men were enrolled. Sleep problems were reported by 28.9% (95%CI: 25.2% to 32.4%) of the sample, while insufficient PA was reported by 84.8% (95%CI: 82.1% to 87.6%). The combination of sleep problems and insufficient PA explained 2.3% of all healthcare costs spent on these patients from 2010 to 2014, which directly accounts for approximately US$ 4,765.01. CONCLUSION: The combination of sleep problems and insufficient PA plays an important role in increasing direct healthcare costs in adults. Public health stakeholders, policymakers, and health professionals can use these results to reinforce the need for strategies to improve sleep quality and increase PA, especially in nations that finance their National Health Systems. |
Original Article Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies of the Upper Limbs in Brazil: a descriptive cross-sectional study Moura, Samuel Ricardo Batista Nakachima, Luis Renato Santos, João Baptista Gomes dos Belloti, João Carlos Fernandes, Carlos Henrique Faloppa, Flavio Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe de Sabongi, Rodrigo Guerra Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Congenital Anomalies of the Upper Limb (CAUL) are a group of structural or functional abnormalities that develop during intrauterine life and can lead to limb dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prevalence of congenital anomalies of the upper limbs in Brazil and assess maternal and neonatal variables. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted on congenital upper limb malformations among live births across Brazil. METHODS: The study spanned from 2010 to 2019. Data were sourced from the Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System (DATASUS) and the Live Birth Information System (SINASC) portal. Analyses focused on the information reported in field 41 of the Live Birth Declaration Form entered into the computerized system. RESULTS: The most common anomaly in Brazil was supernumerary fingers, classified as ICD-Q69.0, affecting 11,708 children, with a prevalence of 4.02 per 10,000 live births. Mothers aged over 40 years had a 36% higher prevalence of having children with CAUL than mothers under 40 years old (OR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.19-1.56). Newborns weighing ≥ 2,499 g were 2.64 times more likely to have CAUL compared to those weighing ≥ 2,500 g (OR = 2.64; 95% CI 2.55-2.73). CONCLUSION: There was an observed increase in the reporting of CAUL cases over the decade studied. This trend serves as an alert for health agencies, as understanding the prevalence of CAUL and its associated factors is crucial for preventive medicine. |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Reliability across content areas in progress tests assessing medical knowledge: a Brazilian cross-sectional study with implications for medical education assessments Hamamoto Filho, Pedro Tadao Hashimoto, Miriam Lima, Alba Regina de Abreu Diehl, Leandro Arthur Costa, Neide Tomimura Rehder, Patrícia Moretti Yarak, Samira Andrade, Maria Cristina de Hafner, Maria de Lourdes Marmorato Botta Ribeiro, Zilda Maria Tosta Moriguti, Júlio César Bicudo, Angélica Maria Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Brazilian medical schools equitably divide their medical education assessments into five content areas: internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and public health. However, this division does not follow international patterns and may threaten the examinations’ reliability and validity. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability indices of the content areas of serial, cross-institutional progress test examinations. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: This was an analytical, observational, and cross-sectional study conducted at nine public medical schools (mainly from the state of São Paulo) with progress test examinations conducted between 2017 and 2023. METHODS: The examinations covered the areas of basic sciences, internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and public health. We calculated reliability indices using Cronbach’s α, which indicates the internal consistency of a test. We used simple linear regressions to analyze temporal trends. RESULTS: The results showed that the Cronbach’s α for basic sciences and internal medicine presented lower values, whereas gynecology, obstetrics, and public health presented higher values. After changes in the number of items and the exclusion of basic sciences as a separate content area, internal medicine ranked highest in 2023. Individually, all content areas except pediatrics remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining an equitable division in assessment content may lead to suboptimal results in terms of assessment reliability, especially for internal medicine. Therefore, content sampling of medical knowledge for general assessments should be reappraised. |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding skin cancer among health sciences students in Turkey: A cross-sectional study Dogan, Esin Sevgi Caydam, Ozden Dedeli Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding skin cancer are important for reducing the future impact of the disease. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated university students’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about skin cancer and examined the variables influencing their attitudes and beliefs about the disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Faculty of Health Sciences at Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey. METHOD: A total of 960 students participated in this study. Data were collected using the Student Introduction Form, Fitzpatrick Skin Type Scale, Skin Cancer and Sun Knowledge Scale (SCSKS), and Health Belief Model Scale for Skin Cancer (HBMSSC). RESULTS: The mean SCSKS score of the participants was 14.91 ± 4.23. The mean HBSSC scores of the participants were 23.58 ± 7.79 for perceived susceptibility, 14.79 ± 4.59 for perceived severity, 20.64 ± 6.60 for perceived benefits, 15.93 ± 4.09 for perceived barriers, and 21.78 ± 7.14 for self-efficacy. The mean SCSKS total scores of the university students were significantly and positively correlated with the HBMSSC subdimensions. Gender explained 1.58 of the variance in perceived benefits and 1.65 of the variance in self-efficacy, whereas the SCSKS score explained most other variables. CONCLUSION: The students’ knowledge of skin cancer and sun protection was moderate. Their attitudes and beliefs regarding skin cancer were unexpected. This study identified students’ knowledge of skin cancer and sun protection as the most important variables for improving their attitudes and beliefs about skin cancer. |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Acute renal failure, COVID-19 and deaths, worrying rates in intensive care units: a cross-sectional study Watanabe, Yoshimi José Ávila Carvalho, Lívia Maria Rezende Guedes, João Victor Marques Baldoni, André Oliveira Belo, Vinícius Silva Otoni, Alba Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Acute kidney failure is a serious consequence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). OBJECTIVES: To identify the prevalence of COVID-19, kidney failure, frequency of death, and associated factors in patients receiving intensive care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analytical cross-sectional study conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a medium-sized philanthropic general hospital in center-west Minas Gerais. METHODS: Adults and older individuals who underwent real-time polymerase chain reaction testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were evaluated by the nephrology team. RESULTS: Among the 176 patients, the prevalence of COVID-19 and acute kidney injury (AKI) were 103 (58.5%) and 132 (75%), respectively, and 44 (25%) had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 16 (15,5%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. In the Charlson index classification, which estimates the risk of death, a statistically significant difference was identified in the percentages of groups with and without COVID-19 for indices 0, 1, and 2. There was a significant association between kidney disease and ICU mortality (P < 0.05). Patients with CKD had fewer fatal outcomes (13/97, 13.4%) than those with AKI (85/97, 87.6%). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 rates remained high long after diagnosis and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, a higher death rate among patients who developed AKI, whose prevalence was also greater than that in the national literature, regardless of the presence of COVID-19, revealed a worrying scenario and corroborated the need for early and judicious approaches to preserve the lives of patients with AKI admitted to intensive care units. |
Original Article Burden of metabolic syndrome on primary healthcare costs among older adults: A cross-sectional study Ricardo, Suelen Jane Araujo, Monique Yndawe Castanho Santos, Lionai Lima dos Romanzini, Marcelo Fernandes, Rômulo Araújo Turi-Lynch, Bruna C. Codogno, Jamile Sanches Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on healthcare costs remains unclear in the literature. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of MetS on primary healthcare costs of adults, as well as to identify the impact of physical activity and other covariates on this phenomenon. DESIGN AND SETTING: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the city of Presidente Prudente, State of São Paulo/Brazil, in 2016. METHODS: The sample comprised 159 older adults (> 50 years) of both sexes (110 women) who were identified from their medical records in the Brazilian National Health Service. Healthcare costs (US$) were assessed through medical records and divided into medical consultations, medications, laboratory tests, and total costs. MetS was assessed using medical records. RESULTS: The Brazilian National Health Service spent more on consultations (US$ 22.75 versus US$ 19.39; + 17.3%) and medication (US$ 19.65 versus US$ 8.32; + 136.1%) among adults with MetS than among those without MetS, but the costs for laboratory tests were similar (P = 0.343). Total costs were 53.9% higher in adults with MetS than in those without the diagnosis of the disease (P = 0.001). Regarding total costs, there was an increase of US$ 38.97 when five components of MetS were present (P = 0.015), representing an increase of approximately 700%, even after adjusting for sex, age, and physical activity. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the presence of the MetS is responsible for increasing primary care costs among older adults, especially in those related to medicines. |
Original Article Impact of the improvement of living conditions on tuberculosis mortality in Brazil: an ecological study Natividade, Marcio Pereira, Marcos Stauber, Christine Miranda, Samilly Teixeira, Maria Glória Souza, Ramon Andrade de Anjos, Marilia Santos dos Barros, Rafael Morato, Daniela Gonçalves Aragão, Erika Pereira, Susan Martins Costa, Maria da Conceição Nascimento Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The risk of death due to tuberculosis (TB) in Brazil is high and strongly related to living conditions (LC). However, epidemiological studies investigating changes in LC and their impact on TB are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of LC on TB mortality in Brazil. DESIGN AND SETTING: This ecological study, using panel data on spatial and temporal aggregates, was conducted in 1,614 municipalities between 2002 and 2015. METHODS: Data were collected from the Mortality Information System and the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. The proxy variable used for LC was the Urban Health Index (UHI). Negative binomial regression models were used to estimate the effect of the UHI on TB mortality rate. Attributable risk (AR) was used as an impact measure. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2015, TB mortality rate decreased by 23.5%, and LC improved. The continuous model analysis resulted in an RR = 0.89 (95%CI = 0.82–0.96), so the AR was −12.3%. The categorized model showed an effect of 0.92 (95%CI = 0.83–0.95) in municipalities with intermediate LC and of 0.83 (95%CI = 0.82–0.91) in those with low LC, representing an AR for TB mortality of −8.7% and −20.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Improved LC impacted TB mortality, even when adjusted for other determinants. This impact was greater in the strata of low-LC municipalities. |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Alcohol consumption habits and their impact on academic performance: analysis of ethanol patterns among health students. A cross-sectional study Brito, Ana Paula Amaral de Lima, Aísa de Santana Rocha, Átina Carneiro Gonçalves, Beatriz Muniz Freitas, Dalila Maria Costa Baraúna de Oliveira, Gleice de Jesus Lima, Jamily Kaliny Azevedo Avena, Katia de Miranda Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Studies have indicated a substantial increase in alcohol consumption among university students. Specifically, abusive consumption among health students can adversely affect their academic training and future professional practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze alcohol consumption habits among healthcare students and investigate the associations between alcohol consumption patterns and sociodemographic and academic variables. DESIGN AND SETTING: We performed this cross-sectional study at a private university located in the city of Salvador, Bahia. METHODS: We conducted this study with 770 students using a printed, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire containing sociodemographic and academic performance data, as well as the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory (RAPI). RESULTS: We observed that the prevalence of alcohol consumption (65.1%) and binge drinking (57.5%) among Brazilian healthcare students was high, with more frequent consumption among men (73.1%), in medicine (83.0%) and veterinary medicine (79.1%) programs and in semesters beyond the fourth (71.7%). We found associations between drinking habits and sex (P = 0.016), religion (P < 0.000), course (P < 0.000) and semester (P = 0.047). Binge drinking was associated with attending academic activities without getting any sleep (P < 0.000), missing classes due to hangovers (P < 0.000), encountering issues with the institution’s administration (P = 0.028), and failing to complete activities due to alcohol consumption (P < 0.000). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of alcohol consumption and binge drinking among Brazilian healthcare students was high and associated with sex, religion, course, academic semester, risky behaviors, and negative academic impacts. |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Perceptions of childhood immunization in São Paulo: quantitative-qualitative cross-sectional study Costa, Lucas de Brito França, Carolina Nunes Nali, Luiz Henrique da Silva Colombo-Souza, Patrícia Novo, Neil Ferreira Juliano, Yára Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Vaccination hesitation spans from historical diseases such as smallpox to the current challenges with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In Brazil, vaccination faces obstacles related to trust and convenience. Despite the National Immunization Program, fear of adverse effects as well as misinformation challenge confidence in vaccines, and anti-vaccine movements have gained momentum. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated childhood vaccine refusal, including COVID-19 vaccines, by comparing the reasons for and sociodemographic differences between vaccinated individuals and those who hesitated or refused immunization. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, using questionnaires administered during pediatric consultations between January and April 2023. METHODS: This study investigated vaccine hesitancy and the attitudes of parents and caregivers of children (0–12 years) towards vaccines. The questionnaire was administered during routine pediatric consultations at three different locations, each with 50 participants for a total of 150 participants, to avoid selection bias. RESULTS: Marked differences were evident among caregivers in terms of sex, race, income, education, and religion, which influenced their attitudes toward vaccination. There was an increase in the refusal of seasonal vaccinations and a significant distrust of the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine (52%), with concerns about its side effects. Although most patients did not stop vaccination, significant delays occurred, especially in the clinical setting (58%). CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the importance of childhood health decisions, indicating the need to build trust in vaccines, tailor health policies, and investigate the causes of distrust to promote childhood immunizations. |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Relationship between angiogenic growth factors and atherosclerosis in renal transplantation recipients: a cross-sectional study Çoban, Melahat Durak, Beyza Algul Karakan, Mine Sebnem Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Accelerated development of atherosclerosis has been observed in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are vascular enzymes that play important roles in vascular development and angiogenesis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Ang-2 and VEGF and atherosclerosis in RTRs. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study was conducted at Ankara City Hospital, Turkey. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 36 (37.5%) female and 60 (62.5%) male RTRs. All findings were compared with those of 70 healthy controls. Ultrasonographic measurements of the carotid artery intima-media thickness (CA-IMT) and renal resistive index (RRI) were used as indicators of atherosclerosis. RESULTS: Log10 Ang-2, log10 VEGF, CA-IMT, and RRI levels were significantly higher in patients than in healthy controls. No significant differences were detected in CA-IMT and RRI between those with log10 Ang-2 ≥ 3.53 pg/mL and those with < 3.53 pg/mL. No significant differences were detected in CA-IMT and RRI between those with log10 VEGF ≥ 1.98 pg/mL and those with < 1.98 pg/mL. No correlation was detected between log10 Ang-2 and log10 VEGF, CA-IMT, or RRI. CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum angiogenic growth factor levels and increased atherosclerosis development were detected in RTRs compared to healthy individuals. No relationship was observed between angiogenic growth factors and atherosclerosis. This may be due to the decreased synthesis and effect of angiogenic growth factor receptors synthesized from atherosclerotic plaques due to atherosclerosis, which improves after renal transplantation. |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Accuracy and precision of non-invasive thermometers compared with the pulmonary artery temperature: a cross-sectional study Carvalho, Rafael Lima Rodrigues de Victoriano, Mariana Avendanha Campos, Camila Claúdia Vassallo, Paula Frizera Nobre, Vandack Ercole, Flávia Falci Abstract in English: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Temperature fluctuations are critical indicators of a patient’s condition in intensive care units (ICUs). While invasive methods offer a more reliable measurement of core temperature, they carry greater risks of complications, limiting their use in most situations. This underscores the need for research evaluating the reliability of non-invasive temperature monitoring methods. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the accuracy and precision of four non-invasive temperature measurement techniques compared to pulmonary artery temperature, considered the gold standard. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a cross-sectional clinical study with repeated measures in the ICUs at Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais and Hospital Felício Rocho, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. METHODS: All patients admitted with a pulmonary artery catheter were included. We simultaneously recorded temperatures from the pulmonary artery, axillary area, oral cavity, temporal artery, and tympanic membrane. Bland-Altman plots were employed to assess the agreement between the different temperature measurements. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients participated, with a mean age of 54 years. Females comprised 66.67% of the sample. Compared to pulmonary artery temperature, the accuracy and precision (mean and standard deviation) of the non-invasive methods were: axillary (-0.42°C, 0.59°C), oral (-0.30°C, 0.37°C), tympanic membrane (-0.21°C, 0.44°C), and temporal artery (-0.25°C, 0.61°C). Notably, in patients with abnormal body temperature (non-normothermic), only oral and tympanic membrane methods maintained their accuracy and precision. CONCLUSIONS: The non-invasive thermometers evaluated in this study demonstrated acceptable accuracy and precision (within the clinically relevant threshold of 0.5°C) compared to pulmonary artery temperature. Among the non-invasive methods, the tympanic membrane measurement proved to be the most reliable, followed by the oral method. |