ALFRED SCHÜTZ: DO REFERENCIAL TEÓRICO-FILOSÓFICO AOS PRINCÍPIOS METODOLÓGICOS DE PESQUISA FENOMENOLÓGICA

This is a reflection on the phenomenological theoretical-philosophical referential of the sociology, presenting the research- methodological principles by Alfred Schutz, considering this because the referential outlines the path to the full composition of the phenomenological research. Each principle is presented in detail using research that led to the referential proposal. This illustrates the manner in which the steps were executed to achieve a phenomenological approach. It was noted that it is compulsory to be fluent in the method by adopting a common thread that explains the research proposal and provides an overview of it. The idea of building these principles was to demonstrate the potential of using the theoretical-philosophical referential by Schutz as a methodological possibility to achieve the objectives of the research. DESCRIPTORS: Qualitative research. Methodology. Nursing. Social science.


INTRODUCTION
Theoretical cogitations are actions developed according to an elaborated project, within a hierarchy of plans established by the decision to pursue and develop scientific activities, with the proposal to solve the situation in question.That being said, theoretical thought does not affect the exterior world, being subject to permanent revision and capable of being modified without generating any change in the real world, and the theoretical thinker is interested in questions and solutions that are valid in themselves.] In social science methodology, Austrian thinker Alfred Shütz (1899-1959) sought to attain his proposal to establish the fundamentals of a comprehensive phenomenological sociology, thus developing his theory, which proposed the analysis of mutual social relationships that involve people.He highlights the characteristics of each relationship, whose actions occur in a conscious manner because they are intentional, discussing the relationship between conscience and action, having a meaning for the subject.
Thus, human beings act on the basis of motivations driven by objectives that point to the future, called "motives for," and the reasons for their actions are rooted in experiences from the past, in the personality that developed during his or her life, called "motives why." [1][2] In this framework, it is understood that reality is constructed by human beings for themselves, based on their inter-subjective experiences.With his ideas, the author founds a sociology of knowledge, which originates from the common sense of everyday life and cognitive processes through which it is established and applied, treating intersubjectivity as an intra-mundane datum on which is built any activity of the I of relationship and social science itself.:95 To support his ideas, Schütz appropriated the Husserlian concepts of intentionality, inter-subjectivity and Lebenswelt (life-world), in addition to Weberian concepts of action, social action and understanding, thus having the task of clarifying the objective and subjective sense of the action.He understood that the resolution of this problem requires a philosophical reflection for the development of a theory of human action and its comprehension, and sought answers in phenomenology.2] Thus, leaning over the world of the social life, and using, for this end, a method of descriptive analysis of the constitution of the everyday experience.While we agree with the influence of these authors on the ideas of Shutz, in this work we opt to use exclusively the concepts proposed by Alfred Shütz.
It is emphasized that to understand the world, that is, social reality, one should apprehend its typifications, designated as first-degree constructs, which arise from the speech of the subjects.] Thus, by developing a phenomenological investigation 4 founded on the theoretical-philosophical framework of Alfred Shütz, studies were sought that pointed out methodological functioning based on his ideas; however, they were not found.The located studies do not use Shütz but the classical national and international authors, experts on analysis methods, to direct the comprehensive analysis of his research.This fact generated inquietudes.For what reasons does this happen?Why not use Shütz himself?
By believing that Shütz leaves the path for the complete composition of research, that is, from the formulation of inquietudes to the comprehensive analysis of experiential descriptions, the objective of this manuscript emerged: to reflect on the theoretical-philosophical framework of phenomenological sociology, presenting Alfred Shütz methodological principals of research.To set limits to this reflection, we use as reference the research 4 from which these principles originated.

PRESENTING SHÜTZ' METHODOLOGI-CAL PRINCIPLES OF PHENOMENOLOGI-CAL RESEARCH
To begin to present the results, it is worth citing some selected studies that used the theoreticalphilosophical framework of Alfred Shütz, such as that which dealt with professionals that work in a Center for Psychosocial Attention, with the objective of uncovering the meaning of the work of a mental health team. 5Another study dealt with the routine/everyday of users of a health institution. 6Yet the reference work of this manuscript had long-distance truck drivers as significant subjects, with the purpose of understanding their life-world.Comprehensive research using Schutz is being carried out, thereby configuring the expression of the importance of presenting these methodological principles, with the intention of contributing to the advance of knowledge and the scientific community that desires research with this reference.
Referring to Shütz, to speak of science means to speak of comprehensive sociological phenomenology as a research method, and as such, considerations about methodological aspects begin with the description of the uninterested attitude of the observed, fundamental in the scientific style of investigation.To this follows a study of the formation of the sociological constructs according to the rules of relevance and their postulates * : logical consistency, subjective interpretation and adequacy.] It is worth emphasizing that the principles presented here are interlinked with each other, and the work does not come in stagnant stages.From the beginning, it is necessary to think about all stages to guide the path, because the phenomenological method is recurring.It is only organized in stages to offer a didactic presentation order.

Shütz' first methodological principal of phenomenological research
Uninterested attitude of the scientific observer.In regard to life-world, the researcher is merely an uninterested observer of the social world.Is not involved in the observed situation, in which he has no practical interest, but only cognitive, because it is not the stage of his activities, but only the object of his contemplation.] By uninterested attitude of the scientific observer, the neutrality of the researcher is understood; that is, the passage from a natural framework to a scientific framework, modifying the zone of relevance, from interest in the practical life of common sense to interest in the cognitive apprehension of experiences, taking into consideration the body of his/her science.Having as an initial step placement in epoché, in an exercise of viewing the phenomenon suspending its presuppositions, that take into account all of its acquired knowledge, and letting it be guided by the methodological group adopted.He dislocates his attention to his inquietudes, that is, his question in study, outlining his sphere of work.
In the reference research, 4 by adopting the uninterested attitude of observer, the prereflections and inquietudes that emerged were: what do truck drivers know about the effect of amphetamines on the organism?Is the truck drivers' need for work for their sustenance and that of their families responsible for the use?Is there a predisposition on the part of truck drivers to use uppers?These gave rise to new questions: are there other ways of making long journeys on the road without using uppers?What are they?Why and with what intention? 4

Shütz' second methodological principle of phenomenological research
Rules of sociological relevance.Should be taken into consideration for determination of the question in study, for the disinterested search of unveilings, according to pre-established rules of the scientific method.The scientist joins a previously organized field of knowledge, the body of his science.] Sociological relevance considers that the situation under study has exactly the same meaning for the activity of the science as the practical interests for the activities of everyday work.] The system of relevance of the social scientist is different from the system of relevance of the everyday man, because the social scientist takes as relevant his question to be studied, and the man, naturally, takes as relevant his everyday life problems.Thus the scientist wants to cognitively understand and the man naturally wants to resolve his problems in the social world.
] In this principle the limits are defined "of what," "who" and "where" should be investigated.From what: the subject -phenomenon; whom: significant subjects with the characteristics that can supply reliable information about the phenomenon investigated; where: place of access to the significant subjects of the research.This is the moment of inquietudes, questions and the outline of the objective.Thus, delimiting the phenomenon, the subjects and place of access, that is, the field of work of the study.
In the reference research 4 the limits were: of what: actions practiced by the long-distance truck driver to stay awake for long road trips; who: truck drivers who transport perishable cargo long distances; where: Santa Catarina supply center.Due to the inquietudes, of the definition of the phenomenon and significant subjects, the following questions emerged: what is life like for the long-distance truck driver?What actions does the truck driver take to stay awake during long trips?What is the significance to the truck drivers of the actions they take to stay awake for long trips?From the questions, the objective: to understand the lifeworld of long-distance truck drivers who take actions to stay awake for long road trips, according to the theoretical-philosophical framework of Alfred Shütz.From the questionings and objectives the guiding questions for the interview were formulated: describe the truck driver's life; what actions do you take to stay awake during long road trips?What is the significance of these actions to you?

Schütz' third methodological principal of phenomenological research
Postulate of logical coherence."The system of constructs typically designated by the scientist needs to be established with the highest degree of clarity and sharpness of the conceptual structure at hand, and needs to be totally compatible with the principles of the formal logic.:67 This postulate brings the formal logic of research, understanding that in positivist epistemological studies hypotheses are created and brought to field with the intention of confirming or refuting it.Yet in phenomenology, knowledge is constructed from common sense, from the first-degree construct already lived and experienced, and with this, standardized in the typification of common sense.The researcher only organizes the subjective data, and as such, has the objective of describing the life experience, bringing it to order from the meanings.And he uses the interview as an instrument to obtain the lived experiential descriptions.
In the phenomenological approach, the principal source of data is the dialogue between researcher and informant, with the researcher provoking the informant to describe lived experiences, seeking to enter his world in order to access his experiences. 8n a phenomenological study, reductions are methodological tools and the roots of knowledge should be found in things, in phenomena, in common sense, to which all of our concepts are referenced.Hence, the search occurs in the conscience of the subject that knows, so that phenomena appear.As such, the researcher values the subjectivity of the subjects.If the root of knowledge is in the subject of common sense, that is what should be aimed, starting with the ethical precepts of the research with the forwarding of the project to the ethics committee.The proposal of the reference research 4 was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research with Human Beings from UFSC on December 14th, 2009, under process 551 FR 307654, with the expedition of certification n. 551, and all significant subjects signed the Free and Informed Consent Term, thus meeting the ethical precepts of the research.Approval of the committee was the starting point of the functioning of the research as follows.
Go to the subjects: environment and informal meeting; Interviews: obtaining experiential descriptions with audio recording of the talks, that is, description of the phenomenon by the subject himself who lived or lives it, capturing the intentionality based on guiding questions, in addition to empathetic questions.Obtaining the descriptions should be done until repetitions of ideas emerge in the conversations, sufficient enough to attain the proposed objective, which is to learn the type of action.For this author the talks signify first-level constructs. 7ranscriptions: listen to the recordings various times so that there are no doubts, and all of the speech is entirely transcribed, using the actual wording of the players/subjects of the research for formation of the texts.Systematic organization of the talks: Initially, organize the texts by subject, according to the guiding questions; with this the individual meaning can be learned.After repeated readings, group the talks according to the guiding questions, thus facilitating the complete understanding of the text.In addition to the experiential descriptions, add to this material the field notes that were accumulated, in the sense of facilitating understanding of the meanings of the actions practiced by the subjects.
Unveiling of the structures of subjective meanings of the action: read repeatedly until the structures of the subjective meanings of the action are unveiled, that is, that which appears in the talks as responses to the questionings, and that is repeated in the descriptions of the diverse subjects; Organization of the first-level constructs: when able to comprehend the structures of subjective meanings of the action.It is worth noting that these structures already begin to be shown from the repetitions of the talks, at the time of the interviews.
Thus, the work proceeds in a movement of unveiling and veiling, because many veilings succeed each unveiling.In this movement, the biographical situation of the actors is revealed and the structures of the words organized.
The reference research 4 was doing interviews, transcription, analysis and returns to the field for other interviews, until there was sufficient meaning to attain the proposed objective.From the systematic organization of the words, hear the unveiling of the actions practiced by truck drivers to stay awake for long road trips, and their subjective meanings.These structures lead to the organization of the first-level constructs: descriptions of the experiences lived by the truck drivers.

Shütz fourth methodological principal of phenomenological research
Postulated from the subjective interpretation."In order to study human actions, the scientist should ask that the model of individual mind can be constructed, and that typical contents should be attributed to it, in order to explain the facts observed as a result of the activity of this mind, in a comprehensible relationship.:67 This principle is the key point for the analysis and comprehension of the actions.It emphasizes the primordial meaning of considering the biographical situation of the player studied, since the "why reasons" can only be understood having knowledge of their life history, from that which brought this subject to practice such actions.These motives are rooted in his/her personality, in the learning that was accumulated through life; only by knowing his/her past is it possible to understand the type of mind that undertook such an action.
Based on the understanding of the individual meanings by the corresponding analysis and placement into categories, is it possible to know the group of content typically capable of describing the intentions of such actions, constituting the "motives for."Thus, it is understood that the meaning with which a designated action is interpreted by the player from his/her "why" and "for" reasons, and the combination of these motives forms the categories of the human actions passable of analysis.
The second-degree scientific constructs, formed according to the valid rules of procedure for all empirical sciences, are idealized, typically objective constructs, and as such, a different type from those developed in the first degree, that of common sense thinking, which should be replaced.The constructs are created by the scientist from the words, that is, they are knowledge experienced by society, because social phenomenology originates from the principle that the scientific data are already all preexisting, the scientist only uses his methods to organize them.In other words, the words are interpreted, systemized in the seconddegree constructs, these already being observed in the actual words of the subjects.Different from the positivist logical scientist, who formulated hypotheses and goes into the field to prove or refute it in practice.
That is why a phenomenological study does not formulate hypotheses or thesis, because the thesis is constructed during the work, from the words, developing constructs and reaching the general thesis of the work that, by the Shutz method, is when the type of action is developed, thus constructing the type lived.Then, it becomes necessary to objectify the subject of the social players, and, as such, adopt the phenomenological attitude -which requires making phenomenological and eidetic reductions (epoché).
Phenomenological reduction or epoché: suspension of judgment -the scientist does not doubt the existence of the world, but this existence should be placed between parentheses, because the existing world is not the true theme of phenomenology but the way by which knowledge of the world is revealed.] The researcher is the questioner -he puts into question these existing truths in order to arrive at their essence.This is a different way of viewing this moment, that is, to think in the epoché of common sense, the life-world and we come close from this construction, understanding the way in which it is created in the people.And this puts us in a position of thinking again, not of deconstructing the common sense construct, but in it seeking our comprehension of the world.
In this moment the biographical situation of the scientist should be placed between parentheses, in order to abstain from its presuppositions and prejudices.It is worth noting that this moment of putting himself in epoché is a mental exercise of the researcher that is essential to his phenomenological attitude of conceiving research.It is understood that at every moment the biographical situation of the common sense man may speak more loudly, and we take a risk of seeking in the subjects that which our prejudices predict, in this way being able to leave veiled the true unveilings.
It is understood that phenomenology is movement and this is occurs in the action of doing it, so a continuous process is recommended of doing interviews, listening to descriptions, transcribing, reading texts, analyzing, returning to interviews; in this movement of going and coming of the common sense being a researcher to unveil meanings in the experiences; and that is how the work is developed.Yet to always return to the teachings of Schütz is fundamental, because it emphasizes that the analyses are being done mediated by the biographical situation of the scientist, and for this reason the mental exercise of the distanc-ing is necessary.It is worth emphasizing that not only the analyses, but the entire study.
Eidetic reduction: in theory are imaginative variations of the phenomenon; in phenomenological studies, it is substituted by a conscious analysis that the researcher develops from the units of meaning of each individual, which already vary in their individuality. 9The meaning of the experiences then, is no longer that code of interpretation that sees them as behavior.Thus, as is the case of behavior, only that which is done, finished, has meaning.] With this, in order to understand the phenomenon its essence should be captured, letting the meaning emerge.The essences are structures of meaning seen by different individuals in the same actions; they represent the basic structures of common understanding of any phenomenon, that without which the phenomenon itself may not be thought.Awareness gives meaning to things and the meaning is interpreted.
For this, the words that represent the meaning structures are cut out, grouping the passages that express motives in common reference to the action.The categories of analysis begin to be formed, separated into: why motives and for motives; Grouping of the passages of the words that express the "why motives" (reason) of the practice of that determined action; Grouping of the passages of the words that express the "for motives" (intentionality) of the practice of that determined action.This movement indicates the construction of the categories of human action that compose the actions of the subjects in relation to the meaning of the phenomenon revealing the typicality of the experiences, according to Alfred Shültz' framework.] Thus, by catching that which appears as a global aspect, common in the testimonies, the principle significant aspects of the experience of each subject are identified, in a way that grasps meanings pertinent to the research performed.Yet it is emphasized that identification of a theme, that is, the significant aspect, is based on its importance and centrality, and not the frequency with which it occurs.Thus, the theme is extracted from a group of essences that characterize the structure of the phenomenon, its categorization. 10n the reference research, 4 from the first-level constructs, the phenomenological and eidetic reductions were performed, culminating with the formulation of the analysis categories, separating the words in: "why motives," (reason) and "for reasons" (intentionality), according to the group of actions practiced by the truck drivers.Below is an example: -"why" motives -Category of human action: calculate the trip, plan, do not waste time, do not stop for nothing, sleep a little and rest, as reasons to not use uppers.
-"For" motives -Category of human action; calculate the trip, plan, do not waste time, do not stop for nothing, rest, with the intention of stopping to sleep during the journey.

Schütz fifth methodological principle of phenomenological research
Postulated from the adaptation."In a scientific model of human action, each term should be constructed in such a way that a human act, performed in the world of the life by an individual player, in a manner indicated by the typical construct, is comprehensive for the player himself, as well as his counterparts, in terms of the practical interpretation of everyday life.:68 The adaptation of the data to reality, in the sense that the actions can be understood as much by the actor, his counterparts, as well as the researcher, is the central point of this postulate.The language should be understood by the scientific world and by the life-world in the common sense.This postulate requires that the typical construction is compatible with the totality of our daily life, as well as our scientific experience.
As such, the observer turns to the stock of available knowledge, in which he will seek to find the typical motive that allows him to comprehend the typical action that he observes.The description of the social world, which is in the possibility of our direct experience, refers to the situation face-to-face, to be returned to a you -researchersubject, and to be in a relationship which develops between us -researchers-subjects.
In order to place this postulate into practice, the descriptions of the subjects should be interpreted, and as soon as the second-degree constructs are elaborated, should return to the subjects, in the sense of reconciling the terms for their understanding, of his peers, and of the researcher himself.It is possible to consider this as a final step of the research, which can be obtained by returning to each participant and asking him/her whether the second-degree constructs are compatible with his words.Thus, one can be certain that the essentials were captured, qualifying the method.
In the reference research, 4 the subjects were returned to and new conversations followed, showing them the categories of human action that, together, form the type of action, verifying if what was proposed was compatible with the understanding of each one of the group of truck drivers.

Schütz' sixth methodological principal of phenomenological research
Scientific logic rationality.It considers that the line of rational action and types of people should be constructed in such a way that one player in the life-world would perform the typified action, if he had perfectly clear and sharp knowledge of all of the elements, 7 but here we speak only of those elements assumed by the social scientist as being relevant to this action; and he would tend to use the most appropriate means, supposedly at his disposition, to attain the ends defined by the construct itself.Scientific rationality is seen in the formation of the "ideal type" or typical of the action, in that called "typical puppet," created by the scientist as a resource to elaborate the second degree construct, that is, lived type.
Rational action can be characterized by the possibility of constructing rational standards of social interaction, such as social roles.Rational behavior of one type of person can be predictable within the elements typified in the construct, therefore can be used to verify the "diverse" behavior that, in the real world, are non-typical elements.] It is admitted that to understand the social phenomena, it is necessary to learn them by the code of human motivations, of the ends and means, planning, and categories of human action.The social scientist must always ask what happens in the mind of an individual player whose action resulted in the phenomenon in question.
In the scientific logical rationality, it is the moment of understanding of the motives of the action of the actors and its analysis through the Shütz referential.The analysis aims to understand the meaning of the talks/categories, and is able to implement them analyzing the information in the search for the meaning, that is, studying the categories.The interpretation is a form of synthesis in the sense of understanding to formulate the type of action and to comprehend the lived type.
Through the experiential descriptions of the subjects, the aspects of this phenomenon most emphasized them are captured, considering that these are of greatest significance.Through a process of intuition, an ideal type of this phenomenon is being constructed, this being a tool of analysis of the researcher to elaborate the second-degree construct.This is an interpretation process that seeks to bring the captured aspects to this ideal type.They are elements of the experience and the subjective experiences of the actors, and that seeks to interpret for the understanding of the lived type.
] In this sense, intuition and subjectivity have a fundamental role in the process of localization of this type of information, in addition to the theoretical framework in which the study is situated.
Thus, from the words, first-level constructs, the categories of human action are developed, and from these the type of actions, that is, second-degree constructs, which made possible the constitution of the typology of what is lived by the subjects, in a way that it shows its most relevant aspects.They will translate the point of view, subjects' way of acting, so that the motives of their actions can be understood and, from this, the phenomenon understood.
Hence, the lived type is presented, which is a construct developed through reflection on the common sense experience, which comes in a determined context, in the everyday of the social world, meaning a second-degree development.It considers that the basic concept of all knowledge of the world, common sense as well as scientific knowledge, involves constructs, which is identified as a group of abstractions, generalizations, formalizations and idealizations related to a determined level of think-ing. 7All of the facts are, in principle, selected from a universal context by the activities of our minds, and as such are always interpreted facts.
After construction of the lived type, it undergoes comprehensive analysis, returning to the theoretical-philosophical framework of Shutz, and proceeding to a comparison of the findings with his teachings.Other authors that studied the same theme can also be sought, with the intention of verifying the evolution of the knowledge from research on the topic.
It is understood that conducting the research brings with it the question of subjectivity, because the subject as well as the phenomenon are in the life-world with other subjects.The subjects that participate in common lived experiences share understandings, interpretations, communications, thus establishing an inter-subjectivity.For phenomenology, nothing is objective before being subjective, that is, it is subjectivity that permits the attainment of degrees of objectivity. 11he reference research 4 unveiled the reasons (why) and intentions (for what) of the truck drivers to take specific actions to stay away for long journeys, pointing to type of action, this is nota n individuals typification, but of the objective lived type -the long-distance truck driver that takes actions to stay awake for long road trips.
By bringing together the reasons and intentions the typical truck driver is formed: "that which calculates trip time, plans beforehand, does not lose time during the trip for nothing, only makes necessary stops, sleeps a little when he is tired, and rests when feeling fatigued; and, for this, plans his trip before leaving home, with the intention of stopping to sleep during the journey.Yet if something unplanned happens that makes him late on the route, he will have to increase his trip hours for more time than planned.He will then have to wash his face, drink coffee and continue the trip.If he remains tired, stop, wash his face, drink Coke or coffee with Coke, and continue.If these actions do not work, he stops to take a shower in order to stay awake, without the use of uppers.:108 To understand the lived type of the longdistance truck driver and the meaning of the actions that he practices to stay awake during long journeys constitutes a constant movement of unveiling, veiling, unveiling to the light of the theoreticalphilosophical framework of Alfred Shütz.Thus, all of the principles described here were put into practice as a phenomenological research methodology, to attain the objective of the thesis and understand the operationalization of the research.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
It is important to highlight that this movement of reflection and development of research methodology principles, put forth in the postulates of Alfred Shuütz, was a true phenomenological study, because in some moments the path peared to be clear and unveiled.At other times it was veiled and understanding was difficult.Many approaches and a deep dive into his writings were necessary, in addition to the writings of others who deepened in his work, with the intention of clarifying it, in order to be able to link the principles to conclude this work.
The writings of this author as theory appear clear, but when the interrelationship of his concepts and appropriation of his postulates is sought, the task becomes deeper and in some moments difficult, but at the same time challenging, because it reflects thoughts full of nuances and details that, once unperceived, can bring disadvantages to the scientific rationale of the study.
In addition to presenting the methodological principles of phenomenological research in Shütz, it was sought to describe how the stages of this proposal were worked, in the research that they originated from, with the intention of making it possible for the reader to better comprehend its operationalization.It is believed that this exemplification through the text will contribute so that the researcher attains a comprehensive phenomenological attitude.
During the development and application of the methodological proposal presented here, it was perceived that it is necessary to flow in the method, which should not follow rules, but should adopt a conductor line that makes the phenomenological research proposal understood and proportions a global vision of the same.The idea of constructing these principles was in order to demonstrate the potential use of the theoretical-philosophical framework of Shütz as a methodological possibility, in order to attain the objectives of the research from which they originated.
It is clear that the principles described here refer to our understanding of the framework, but there is still much to do to unveil new possibilities of his work.To make the theoretical-philosophical framework of Shütz operational is considered an advance for knowledge, pointing to possibilities to lay the foundation in the area of health and others.