Effect of humic acid on survival , ionoregulation and hematology of the silver catfish , Rhamdia quelen ( Siluriformes : Heptapteridae ) , exposed to different pHs

This study evaluates whether humic acid (HA; Aldrich) protects the silver catfish, Rhamdia quelen (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824), against exposure to acidic pH. Survival, levels of Na+, Cland K+ plasma, hematocrit, hemoglobin and erythrocyte morphometry were measured. Fish were exposed to 0, 10, 25 and 50 mg L 1 HA at four pH levels: 3.8, 4.0, 4.2 and 7.0 up to 96 hours. None of the fish exposed to pH 3.8 survived for 96 hours into the experiment, and survival of fish subjected to pH 4.0 decreased when HA concentration increased. Plasma Na+ levels decreased when pH was acidic, with no influence of HA, while Cllevels declined at low pH with increased HA concentration. The levels of K+ at pH 4.0 and 4.2 increased without HA. Hematocrit and hemoglobin augmented under the effect of HA. At pH 4.0 and 4.2, erythrocytes of fish not exposed to HA were smaller, an effect that was partially offset by the presence of HA, since the values at pH 7.0 were higher. Although HA showed some positive effects changes in hematological and plasma K+a in silver catfish caused by exposure to acidic pH, the overall findings suggest that HA does not protect this species against acidic pH because it increased mortality and Clloss at pH 4.0.

Dissolved organic matter, an integral part of all ecosystems, results from the decay of plant and animal debris (THURMAN 1985).It comprises humic, fulvic, and other organic acids, and is usually quantified as dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (WOOD et al. 2011).DOC is known to positively regulate several biotic/abiotic processes (STEINBERG et al. 2007, WOOD et al. 2011).In blackwaters, such as those found in forest streams in the Amazon, coastal lagoons in southeastern Brazil, Finnish and Swedish lakes, and Canadian wetlands, DOC may range from 10 to 300 mg CL -1 , while its average content in freshwater systems elsewhere is 0.5-4.0mg CL -1 (THURMAN 1985, KÜCHLER et al. 2000, FARJALLA et al. 2009).The high levels of DOC account for the acidity of the aquatic environment.In order to thrive in acidic environments, organisms need a certain degree of specialization in their osmoregulatory organs (MATSUO & VAL 2007).
Low pH (pH 4-5) induces ion loss (ZAIONS & BALDISSEROTTO 2000, WOOD et al. 1998, 2002, 2003, GONZALEZ et al. 1998, 2002, BOLNER & BALDISSEROTTO 2007, MATSUO & VAL 2007, DUARTE et al. 2013) and the interference with gill ionoregulatory mechanisms may also trigger hematological disturbances.Ionic dilution, potentiated by the plasma acidosis prompted by H + entry, affects body fluid distribution.This could promote reduction in plasma volume, swelling of erythrocytes or splenic contraction, resulting in elevation of the hematocrit (MILLIGAN & WOOD 1982).Despite being highly responsible for the acidic nature of blackwaters, there is evidence that DOC protects native fish from the deleterious effects of low pH, reducing ion loss (WOOD et al. 1998, 2002, 2003, 2011, GONZALEZ et al. 1998, 2002, MATSUO & VAL 2007).According to some studies, the occurrence of various charged functional groups in the heterogeneous compounds of DOC may change fundamental properties of the gill epithelium, such as the transepithelial potential, thus altering membrane permeability and stimulating ion uptake (WOOD et al. 2011).Humic acid also reduces respiratory stress in fish exposed to slightly acidic water, but increases it at more acidic waters (HOLLAND et al. 2014) and decreases lipid peroxidation and modulates the antioxidant system (RIFFEL et al. 2014).In opposition to the several findings regarding the effects of DOC on ionoregulatory disturbances, respiratory stress and antioxidant system, no evidence has been documented about its influence on the hematology of fish subjected to acidic pH.This study evaluated whether humic acid (HA), one of the major components of DOC, would offer the silver catfish, Rhamdia quelen (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824), protection against the physiological disturbances induced by low pH.This species does not naturally inhabit DOC-enriched, acidic waters, so it is not adapted to such conditions.However, different water quality parameters, including pH and DOC, are present in southern Brazil, where this species is widely cultivated.The outcome of the interaction between such variables should be investigated to improve the rearing conditions of this fish.In laboratory settings, silver catfish juveniles survive for at least 96 hours in the pH 4-9 range (ZAIONS & BALDISSEROTTO 2000), but exposure to pH 5.0 is enough to reduce growth in this species (COPATTI et al. 2005).Therefore, if humic acid has a protective effect on silver catfish exposed to acidic waters, it could reduce the deleterious effect of low pH and improve growth in this species.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
Juvenile silver catfish (n = 240, 73.43 ± 3.5 g, 20.32 ± 1.22 cm, voucher number 19612, Ichthyology Laboratory, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) were acquired from a commercial fishery in Santa Maria, southern Brazil, and acclimated in the Laboratório de Fisiologia de Peixes, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) for three weeks.The fish were equally distributed in 8 tanks of 250 L and kept in dechlorinated tap water under constant aeration (22.14 ± 1.5°C, 6.05 ± 0.45 mg L -1 dissolved oxygen (DO), pH 7.45 ± 0.13 and hardness 24.7 ± 3.9 mg CaCO 3 L -1 ).The water was totally renewed every second day and siphoning was performed daily two hours after feeding.The fish were fed commercial food for juveniles with 42% crude protein once a day.
Lyophilized HA (CAT: 0.675-2 Aldrich ® H1 -HA sodium salt) was the source of DOC used in the tests.It was dissolved in water (the same water used in the acclimation tanks) and agitated for 12 hours in a magnetic stirrer to prepare the stock solution.It was not possible to measure the concentration of DOC in the experimental solutions, but estimation of DOC concentration was made based on the fact that the commercial HA corresponded to ~40% DOC (MCGEER et al. 2002).HA was tested at 0 (control), 10, 25 and 50 mg L -1 HA, the latter corresponding to the nominal DOC concentration of 20 mg C L -1 .These concentrations were chosen because they are within the range observed in the water of the rio Negro Basin (KÜCHLER et al. 2000).At each concentration of HA, four pH ranges were tested, with the following minimum values: 3.8, 4.0, 4.2 and 7.0 (Table 1).The acidic pH tested in the present study were near the most acidic pH (pH 4.0) that allows 100% survival in silver catfish (ZAIONS & BALDISSEROTTO 2000).A pH meter DMPH-2 (Digimed, São Paulo, Brazil) was used to measure the variable four times a day and adjustments to the minimum values within each range were made with sulfuric acid 1 M when necessary.The water in the experimental aquaria was not renewed during exposure time.
Juveniles were fasted for 24 hours prior to being transfered to 40 L aquaria (16 treatments, three replicates of each treatment, five fish per replicate) for the 96-h experiment.Survival was observed four times a day and the dead fish were removed from the aquaria.Fish that survived up to the end of the experimental period were anesthetized with eugenol 50 mg L -1 (CUNHA et al. 2010) and their blood was rapidly collected from the caudal vein with heparinized syringes.After sampling, fish were killed by sectioning the spinal cord.All procedures were conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation of the UFSM (registration #128/2010).
DO levels and temperature were measured daily with Orion 810 oxygen meter (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, Al, USA).Water samples were collected every second day to verify total ammonia (VERDOUW et al. 1978), un-ionized ammonia, hardness (EATON et al. 2005), nitrite (BOYD & TUCKER 1992), Cl - (ZALL et al. 1956), and Na + and K + levels, which were measured in a flame photometer (Micronal B262,São Paulo,Brazil).Details on the composition of the water are provided in Tables 1 and 2. There were no significant differences in water quality parameters between treatments.
To obtain the hematocrit, microcapillary tubes were filled with blood immediately after euthanasia and centrifuged at 10000 Xg for 5 minutes, and the results were obtained using a hematocrit card reader.The concentration of hemoglobin was determined by the cyanmethemoglobin method using a spectrophotometer (BROWN 1976).For the morphometric analyses, blood smears were prepared immediately from the whole blood, air-dried, fixed in methanol and stained with May-Grünwald (TAVARES-DIAS et al. 2004).The surface area and the major and minor axes of the erythrocyte as well as of its nucleus were determined (DORAFSHAN et al. 2008).Briefly, ten high-power fields were randomly selected on each blood smear, and morphometry of ten erythrocytes were determined in each of these fields.All analyses were performed using the Zeiss Axio Vision System with Remote Capture 4.7 Rel DC -Cannon Power shot G9.Blood samples were spun at 3000 Xg for 10 minutes and plasma was stored at -25°C until analyses of Na + , Cl -and K + .The ion levels in the plasma were determined as previously described for the water ion levels.
Homogeneity of variances was assessed via Levene test and the comparison between treatments was carried out by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test.The Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by multiple comparisons of mean ranks, was used for analyses of plasma ion levels (Statistica 7.0 software).Minimum level of significance was 95% (p < 0.05).Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE).

Survival
None of the fish exposed to pH 3.8 survived the 96 hours of experiment.At pH 4.0 there was a progressive decrease in survival (100, 86, 60 and 40%) with increased HA level (0, 10, 25 and 50 mg L -1 HA, respectively).The survival rates at pH 4.2 (93.33%) and 7.0 (100%) were not affected by HA concentration.Survival at pH 4.0 was lower than at pH 4.2 and 7.0 at all treatments with the presence of HA (i.e. 10, 25 and 50 mg L -1 of HA) (Fig. 1).

Hematocrit and hemoglobin
Overall, HA triggered an increase in the percentages of hematocrit and hemoglobin.The presence of HA promoted an increase in the percentage hematocrit at pH 4.0 and 4.2.Upon exposure to pH 7.0, fish experienced a gradual increase in hematocrit from 0 to 25 mg L -1 HA.Hematocrit declined with the increase in pH at 0 mg L -1 HA.Exposure to 10 mg L -1 HA induced significantly higher hematocrit percentage at pH 4.0 and 4.2, while at 25 mg L -1 HA the pH had negligible influence on hematocrit.Treatment with 50 mg L -1 HA caused a significantly reduction in hematocrit concentration at pH 7.0 (Fig. 2).
There was no difference in the percentage of hemoglobin between HA treatments at pH 4.2.Exposure to pH 4.0 induced a higher hemoglobin level at 25 mg L -1 HA than at 0 mg L -1 HA.When fish were exposed to pH 7.0 the hemoglobin was lower at 50 than at 10 mg L -1 HA, and at 0 mg L -1 HA was also lower than at 25 mg L -1 HA.In the absence of HA the levels of hemoglobin decreased as the pH increased.Exposure to 10 mg L -1 HA did not induce differences in hemoglobin values between the different pH.Hemoglobin levels at 25 mg L -1 HA were higher at pH 4.0 than at pH 4.2 and 7.0.On exposure to 50 mg L -1 HA the hemoglobin levels were higher at pH 4.0 and 4.2 than at pH 7.0 (Fig. 3).

Erythrocyte morphometry
Fish subjected to pH 4.0 showed greater cell area and cell minor and major axes in the presence of HA than in the absence of it.At pH 4.2, cell area was larger at 10 and 50 mg L -1 HA than at 25 mg L -1 HA, and it decreased further when HA was not present.At the same pH (4.2), cell minor axis was bigger at 50 than at 0 and 25 mg L -1 HA; it was also bigger at 10 mg L -1 HA compared to 0 mg L -1 HA.At 0 mg L -1 HA, cell area and its minor and major axes were bigger at pH 7.0 than at pH 4.0.The group exposed to 25 mg L -1 HA presented greater cell area at pH 7.0 than at all the acidic pH and greater cell minor axis at pH 7.0 than at pH 4.2.Fish treated with 50 mg L -1 HA had bigger cell minor axis at pH 4.2 than at pH 4.0, and bigger cell major axis at pH 7.0 comparing with pH 4.0 (Table 3).

Plasma Na + , Cl -and K +
In Na + levels, no significant differences were observed in fish exposed to the different HA treatments at pH 4.0 and 7.0, but at pH 4.2, exposure to 25 mg L -1 HA increased Na + levels compared to the group non exposed to HA. Silver catfish exposed to pH 4.0 and 4.2 without HA presented significantly lower Na + levels than those at pH 7.0 without HA, but at 10 mg L -1 HA plasma Na + in fish exposed to pH 4.2 were not significantly different from pH 7.0.Fish at 25 mg L -1 HA and pH 4.2 presented significantly higher Na + levels than at pH 7.0 (Fig. 4).
The levels of Cl -at pH 4.0 were significantly greater in fish exposed to 10 mg L -1 HA, while at pH 4.2 and 7.0 HA did not affect significantly plasma Cl -.Fish subjected to 10 mg L -1 had higher Cl -levels at pH 7.0 and 4.0 than at pH 4.2.Plasma Cl -levels were significantly lower at 25 mg L -1 HA and pH 4.0 and at 50 mg L -1 and pH 4.0 and 4.2 than at pH 7.0 and the same HA levels (Fig. 5).
K + levels were not affect by HA treatments at pH 7.0.However, significantly higher K + levels were observed at 0 mg L -1 HA than at 10 mg L -1 HA and pH 4.0, and at 25 and 50 mg L -1 HA and pH 4.2.The levels of K + were significantly higher at pH 4.0 and 4.2 than at pH 7.0 in fish kept in water without HA (Fig. 6).

DISCUSSION
All water parameters analyzed were within the limits that permit normal growth and survival of silver catfish (e.g.nitrite and un-ionized ammonia levels below 1.2 mg L -1 and 0.1 mg L -1 respectively) (LIMA et al. 2011, MIRON et al. 2011).
According to ZAIONS & BALDISSEROTTO (2000), even though silver catfish presents a marked loss of Na + at pH 4.0, this is the acidic pH threshold for the species survival, at least for 96 h.In the present assessment this assertion was confirmed by the 0% survival of fish exposed to pH 3.8 regardless the HA concentrations.As stated by WOOD & MCDONALD (1982), nonacidophilic species suffocate at pH levels below 4.0 due to gill structural damage, edema and mucification.Moreover, fish mortality in acid waters is largely associated with a failure to   2014) reported increased morbidity of the eastern rainbow fish Melanotaenia splendida splendida (Peters, 1866) as the pH dropped to 3.5-4.0 in the presence of commercial HA, despite having observed a protective effect of the substance at higher acidic levels.The authors suggested that HA may have enhanced the toxicity of low pH by increasing ion loss in the fish.
At pH 4.0, HA displayed a deleterious effect on the physiology of silver catfish; increased concentration of HA was associated with a decline in fish survival.COSTA et al. (pers. comm.)observed that the presence of HA induces proliferation of chloride cells in the lamellae of the gill of silver catfish.Gas transfer in pavement cells might be impaired when chloride cells inundate the lamellae, since thickening of the lamellar epithelium increases blood-to-water diffusion distance (GRECO et al. 1996).BINDON et al. (1994) previously reported a reduction in the lamellar epithelium as a consequence of chloride cell proliferation.Thus, the silver catfish may have been unable to cope with the combination of limited gas exchange, due to increased concentrations of HA, and ionic loss, the result of extreme pH.At higher pH levels, however, the detrimental effect of HA was not observed, most likely because at low pH the excess positive charge titrates away the negatively charged groups associated with the extracellular surface of epithelial membranes (CAMPBELL et al. 1997).This reduces the electrochemical repulsion between the membrane and the negatively charged HA, allowing the two parameters to associate and induce an effect.However, as pH increases the decrease in positive charge means that the HA is now less electrochemically favored to associate with the membrane and thus the effect is diminished.
As stated by ARIDE et al. (2007), acid stress triggers various changes in hematological parameters of freshwater fish.When it takes place, the generated osmotic and ionic gradient favors the entry of water into intracellular space and electrolyte flux in the opposite direction.With that, blood volume decreases, erythrocyte physiology changes, hematocrit, hemoglobin and plasma protein levels rise, and ion loss through the gills is further enhanced (WOOD et al. 1998, ARIDE et al. 2007).Water acidification is also associated with blood acidosis.It affects the oxygenation capacity of the hemoglobin and PO 2 is thus reduced, which in turn triggers an increase in hematocrit and hemoglobin in order to restore proper homeostatic control (MCDONALD & WOOD 1981, DHEER et al. 1987).MILLIGAN & WOOD (1982) found increases in both hematocrit and hemoglobin in rainbow trout during acid exposure.The authors stated that hematocrit elevation probably resulted from a re-  In this investigation, both hematocrit and hemoglobin were highly affected by the experimental variables, considering the basal range previously reported for silver catfish, 17.00-34.00and 4.95-9.09respectively (TAVARES-DIAS et al. 2002).Some of the groups exposed to higher pH levels increased hematocrit and hemoglobin values in the presence of HA, which may be a result of the before-mentioned limited gas exchange induced by HA.Inefficient gill ventilation triggers mechanisms such as splenic contraction in an attempted to absorb more oxygen, therefore elevating hematocrit and hemoglobin (SAMPAIO et al. 2008). RIFFEL et al. (2014) have similarly reported that the addition of HA to the water, though at low concentrations, induced hematocrit and hemoglobin rises in silver catfish at neutral pH.
Somewhat different results were found at pH 7.0 for the hematocrit in the group subjected to 10 mg L -1 HA and for both the hematocrit and hemoglobin in the group exposed to 50 mg L -1 HA.It seems that the fish in those groups, especially in the latter one, were able to compensate for the decreased ventilatory drive caused by HA at the neutral pH, which was not observed at 25 mg L -1 HA.
Exposure of tambaqui to an extreme pH of 3.0 had no influence on blood oxygenation or hemoglobin concentration, demonstrating that this fish, which migrates from circumneutral to acidic waters in its natural habitat, does not encounter challenges in oxygen delivery at such pH level (WOOD et al. 1998).Likewise, ARIDE et al. (2007) observed similar hemoglobin levels between tambaqui subjected to either circumneutral or acid pH, though there was elevation in hematocrit during acid exposure.
As already mentioned, MILLIGAN & WOOD (1982) found that acid exposure triggered disturbances in hematological homeostasis and fluid volume distribution in rainbow trout.Elevation in erythrocyte volume in that species was most likely a result of fluid redistribution from extra-to intracellular compartments due to the ionic dilution of the plasma.In contrast, ARIDE et al. (2007) observed no changes in erythrocyte volume in tambaqui subjected to acid exposure.In the present study it was demonstrated that: a) regardless the HA concentration, the size of the erythrocytes and their nuclei remained stable throughout the groups at pH 7.0; b) at pH 4.0 and 4.2,  and c) within a given concentration of HA, most differences pointed to higher values at pH 7.0 than at acidic pH.The overall response suggests that, unlike the studies cited above, low pH caused a shrinking effect on the erythrocytes of silver catfish.The presence of HA did not fully counteract such outcome, since the differences were significant comparing to pH 7.0 This effect could be due to output of water and hydromineral disturbance, which typically arise from stress in fish (WENDELAAR BONGA 1997).
Plasma levels of Na + of silver catfish at pH 4.0 and 4.2 were lower than those observed at pH 7.0.The disruptive process in this extreme aquatic environment primarily involves active inhibition of ion uptake and increased ion loss in the gills (MILLIGAN & WOOD 1982).FREDA & MCDONALD (1988) observed the complete inhibition of Na + influx in shiners and trout exposed to pH 4.0, in addition to an increase in the ion outward flux.LIN & RANDALL (1993) claimed that inhibition of Na + uptake at low pH results from the reduced activity of an apical electrogenic H + ATPase that energizes an apical Na + channel in chloride cells, an effect attributed to the H + gradient.Stimulation of Na + efflux, which is the primary determinant of low pH tolerance, is usually a consequence of the H + -induced Ca 2+ leaching from the paracellular channels in the gills (GONZALEZ et al. 1997).MCDONALD &WOOD (1981) andWOOD et al. (1998) stated that disturbance of ionoregulation by high external H + is likely to occur in nonacidophilic species when they are subjected to a sudden acid stress.On the other hand, fish that inhabit naturally acidified, diluted waters, such as those found in the Amazon basin or along the eastern coast of the United States, show a greater tolerance to high concentration of water H + and have a lower pH threshold at which marked ion losses occur (GONZALEZ & DUNSON 1989, GONZALEZ et al. 1998, WOOD et al. 1998, MATSUO & VAL 2007).In some species the adaptation to thrive in these waters involves increased branchial affinity for Ca 2+ at the paracellular junction, thus counteracting low pHinduced displacement (FREDA & MCDONALD 1988, GONZALEZ & DUNSON 1989).Further, some fish are able to take up ions at high rates when there is high diffusive ion leakage (GONZALEZ et al. 1997(GONZALEZ et al. , 1998)), and at least two Amazon species have pHinsensitive Na + transporter (GONZALEZ & WILSON 2001).For FREDA & MCDONALD (1988), two important abilities may respond for the interspecific differences in acid tolerance: limitation of the ionic leakiness prompted by low pH, and ion transporter recovery from the low pH inhibition.
Besides their own endogenous mechanisms, fish native to DOC-enriched habitats may relay on the great amount of organic substances found there to improve ion homeostasis (GONZALEZ et al. 1998, 2002, WOOD et al. 2002, 2003).GONZALEZ et al. (2002) and MATSUO & VAL (2007) observed that the presence of DOC in acidic water reduced both Na + influx inhibition and diffusive efflux stimulation in teleosts native to Amazonia.The role of DOC to bind fish gills at low pH and promote physiological benefits (CAMPBELL et al. 1997) may be comparable with the above-mentioned action of elevated waterborne levels of Ca 2+ , that is, stabilization of tight junctions and prevention of ion losses.That would override any protective effect otherwise achieved by the divalent ion (WOOD et al. 2003(WOOD et al. , 2011)).Besides, it could result from the ability of the organic molecules to bind to ion apical transporters and help concentrate Na + and Cl -ions by complexation, or to help deliver the ions to the uptake sites, which is normally credited to mucus (GONZALEZ et al. 2002, STEINBERG et al. 2007).
Except when pH was 4.2, at which the presence of HA was associated with a slightly higher Na + plasma level in silver catfish, there were no differences in the ion levels between the different HA concentrations at any given pH.This could be explained by the observation that this fish species is not native to waters with high DOC content, so its gill physiology may not be sensitive to the DOC's protective mechanism (MATSUO et al. 2004).Another possibility is that commercial HA is not as useful to silver catfish as natural black water, as observed by WOOD et al. (2003) in stingrays (Potamotrygon sp.): HA stimulated Na + and Cl -leakage, probably because its high affinity for cations ends up stripping Ca 2+ from the gills.Consequently, the authors concluded that this source of DOC may have different binding characteristics than does natural black water DOC.
The inhibitory mechanism of Cl -uptake under low pH is possibly associated with the already described mechanism of Na + uptake inhibition.Besides, it could be due to a reduction in intracellular HCO - 3 at the chloride cells, thus exhausting the apical Cl -/HCO -3 exchanger (WOOD 2001).Cl -loss in silver catfish was exacerbated at 25 and 50 mg L -1 HA in the fish exposed to pH 4.0, thus demonstrating a greater involvement of HA in Cl -than in Na + flux.Such difference may be linked to their distinct ionoregulatory mechanisms across the gill epithelium, since Cl -and Na + are exchanged for base and acid equivalents, respectively (GOSS & WOOD 1990).
Comparing with the responses on Na + and Cl -balance, a different effect of HA was observed with regard to the dynamics of K + regulation.When there was no HA in the test water, the levels of K + in silver catfish exposed to pH 4.0 and 4.2 were higher in comparison to ion levels in fish subjected to pH 7.0.A similar outcome was observed in the pirapitinga, Piaractus brachypomus, in a recent investigation (GARCIA et al. 2014). Further, ZAIONS & BALDISSEROTTO (2000) found lower body levels of K + in silver catfish subjected to pH 7.0 than in those subjected to either acidic or alkaline pH.MATHAN et al. (2010) also observed higher plasma K + levels in the common carp, Cyprinus carpio, after exposure to acidic pH, and suggested that it could be due to a release of K + from the muscle cells as H + enters them.Another study assessing plasma ion levels in silver catfish exposed to Aldrich HA (0, 2.5 and 5 mg L -1 ) at pH ~ 7.0 observed a progressive increase in K + levels with increased HA concentrations, suggesting that HA ZOOLOGIA 32 (3): 215-224, June 2015 could limit gill permeability (RIFFEL et al. 2014).In this study HA did not influence K + levels at pH 7.0, while at the intermediate pH levels (4.0 and 4.2) its presence caused a marked decrease in ion levels.Thus, all concentrations of HA were able to counteract increased K + levels caused by pH 4.0 and 4.2, bringing K + levels back to normal values for the species (BOLNER & BALDISSEROTTO 2007), at pH 7.0.
Low pH exposure induced continuous net branchial losses of Na + , Cl -and K + , and a progressive decline in plasma Na + and Cl -levels in rainbow trout (MCDONALD & WOOD 1981).In spite of an improved tolerance to acidity reported for fish that are exposed to gradual water acidification in the wild, it is possible that the same fish will undergo ion loss when faced with sudden environmental acidification.For instance, ARIDE et al. (2007) found that plasma levels of Na + and K + in the tambaqui were reduced in acidic water compared to a circumneutral water.WILSON et al. (1999) observed that acid exposure produced different patterns of Na + , Cl -and K + fluxes in three Amazon fish, which implies that acid tolerance is not necessarily a typical feature of the fish that inhabit this region.Instead, it is largely related to the occurrence of these fish in the blackwater areas of that ecosystem, which are known to impose higher levels of acidity on the species.
Although HA showed some positive effects on hematological and plasma K + changes provoked in silver catfish by acidic pH exposure, the overall findings suggest that HA does not protect this species against acidic pH burden, since it increased mortality and Cl -loss at pH 4.0.
3): 215-224, June 2015 duction in plasma volume, erythrocyte swelling and release of erythrocytes from the spleen due to increased circulating catecholamines.

Table 1 .
Ion levels in water at different pH and humic acid (HA) levels for Rhamdia quelen.
Mean values ± SE (n = 4/group for ions).There was no significant difference between treatments.

Table 2 .
Water quality parameters at different pH and humic acid (HA) levels for Rhamdia quelen.

Table 3 .
Effect of humic acid and pH on erythrocyte morphology of Rhamdia quelen.