Open-access Low-Cost and rapid method for genomic DNA isolation from Platonia insignis: an endangered fruit tree species of the Brazilian Amazon

Platonia insignis is a fruit tree native to the Amazon, with enormous potential for food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries (Lima et al., 2022; Rocha et al., 2024). It is an allogamous species with sporophytic self-incompatibility and the high heterozygosity in progenies results in considerable annual irregularity in fruit production (Saraiva et al., 2013). Recent loss of habitat (due to deforestation, changes in land use and urbanization) combined with long juvenile period’s makes P. insignis an important species for conservation and genetic improvement efforts (Nascimento et al., 2021; Alves et al., 2025). In this context, the characterization of germplasm for the selection of more adapted, more productive and faster genotypes is essential, and molecular tools play a crucial role in accelerating breeding and conservation programs (Pontes et al., 2017). For that, high-quality DNA isolation is crucial. Also, the choice of an adequate tissue sampling method is a key step.

Obtaining leaf tissue from P. insignis trees requires complex tree climbing logistics, since productive trees reach up to 30 meters in height (Alves et al., 2025). Alternatively, leaf acquisition from seedlings is a slow process, since epicotyl emergence can last from 2 to 6 months, due to a dormancy in the seed plumule region (Carvalho and Nascimento, 2018). For that reason, we aimed to validate modifications on cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction protocol and compare it efficiency in leaf tissue preserved in four different forms. Also, we wanted to evaluate the efficiency of this method to isolate DNA from the meristematic tissue of the primary root, whose emergence is available approximately 30 days after sowing, which could to contribute for early genotyping of P. insignis progenies.

The leaf tissues were used in four states: fresh leaves (FL), frozen leaves (FzL), previously stored at -20°C, in Silica leaves (SiL), and dried leaves (DrL), from exsiccates. Root meristematic tissue (Frozen Root, FzR) was sampled 20 days post-sowing and stored at -20°C until DNA extraction (Figure 1A). Approximately 200mg of tissues were subjected to the CTAB protocol with modifications, as described below: 1) Tissue were manually macerated with extraction buffer in porcelain mortars and pistils [CTAB 2%, NaCl 1.4M, EDTA 20mM, Tris-HCL pH 8.0 100mM, Polyvinylpyrrolidone 2%, Proteinase K 0.1mg/mL and β-mercaptoethanol 0.2%]; 2) The mixture was incubated in a water bath at 65°C for 45 minutes, 3) 700µL of Chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (CIA 24:1) was added, followed by homogenization by gentle inversions for 10 min; 4) First centrifugation was performed (13,200rpm, for 5 minutes) and the aqueous phase was transferred to new tubes; 5) 300µL of 10% CTAB were added to each tube and another 700 µL of CIA, followed by gentle inversions for 5 minutes; 6) Samples were centrifuged at 13,200rpm for 5 minutes, and the aqueous phase was removed to a new tube; 7) The aqueous phase was incubated with RNAase (40µg/µl) at 37°C for 30 min; 8) 500µl of isopropanol was added for DNA precipitation at -20°C; 9) Tubes were centrifuged at 13,200rpm for 10 min, at 4°C; 10) The isopropanol was discarded and the pellet was washed with 70% and 95% ethanol, and then allowed to dry; 11) DNA was resuspended in 50µL of TE (10mM Tris-Hcl, 1mM EDTA pH 8.0). Modifications were adapted from Doyle and Doyle (1990) and Alzate-Marin et al. (2009).

Figure 1
A) Plant tissues and preservation methods of P. insignis: fresh leaf (FL), frozen leaf (FzL), silica gel leaf (SiL), dried leaf (DrL) and frozen root (FzR); B) Agarose gel electrophoresis (1%) of extracted DNA from different tissues and preservation methods of P. insignis. C) DNA concentration (ng/μL) isolated from different tissues and preservation methods. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences after ANOVA test (*p < 0.05).

DNA concentration (ng/μL) and purity (A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios) were measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (BioDrop UV/VIS, BioDrop Ltd.), based on 1µL of extracted DNA. DNA integrity was assessed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel (100V, for 1 hour). To verify the efficiency of the method, ANOVA test followed by Tukey post-hoc test was used (p<0.05). Data were analyzed using GraphPadPrism v.8.0.1 software.

High concentrations of DNA were obtained in all tissues (Figure 1C). The DNA concentrations isolated in FzR was statistically lower than obtained in FzL, indicating that tissue influenced the amount of isolated DNA (Table 1, p<0.05).

Table 1
DNA concentration (ng/µL) and absorbance ratio values obtained in P. insignis different tissues: fresh leaf (FL), frozen leaf (FzL), silica gel leaf (SiL), dried leaf (DrL) and frozen root (FzR).

Although fresh leaves are considered the best tissue type for DNA isolation (Funk et al., 2017), our results indicate that root meristem tissue can also be isolated with our CTAB modified protocol, but with lower amounts. Some tissues and tree species require more complex and optimized extraction protocols than others (Alzate-Marin et al., 2009; Pratyusha, 2022; Schenk et al., 2023). For DNA isolation, P. insignis did not require big adaptations. The first adaptation made was the removal of liquid nitrogen for tissue maceration. Although liquid nitrogen is the most used for tissue maceration, since it paralyzes enzymatic and cellular processes and prevents the degradation of DNA and RNA (Sahu et al., 2012), it requires a complex and high-cost infrastructure, which is not always available in molecular biology laboratories (Santos and Araújo, 2017; Hale et al., 2020). Here, we validated the manual maceration as equally effective for obtaining good quantity and high integrity of DNA (Figure 1B), with lower costs, similar to those reported by Quiñones et al. (2024). The modified protocol presented higher efficiency than observed in some commercial that are also expensive and not available for all labs (Abubakar et al., 2018).

The protocol was efficient to obtain DNA free of proteins or organic solvents (Table 1, x̄A260/280=1.8), but not free from phenolic compounds, especially on SiL and DrL samples, that significantly differed from FrL and FzL for A260/230 ratio (Table 1, p<0.05). The A260/230 ratio ranged from 1.05 to 1.73 (Table 1), values below the ideal range (2.0–2.2), suggesting that additional washing steps of the pellet with 70% ethanol or an extended incubation period in the water bath could improve the removal of salts and phenolic residues, or increase their solubilization and consequent removal during contaminant centrifugation in the evaluated tissues, especially in SiL and DrL.

The A260/230 ratio ranged from 1.05 to 1.73 (Table 1), values below the ideal (2.0–2.2), suggesting that additional washing steps of the pellet wash with 70% ethanol could had improve the removal of salts and phenolic residues, other option would be increasing the incubation period on water bath, that could had enhance the contaminants solubilization and subsequent removal (on centrifugation) in the tissues, especially in SiL and DrL.

Long storage times can increased DNA fragmentation can negatively interfere with the detection limit of the molecular markers (Demeke and Jenkins, 2010). Our findings indicate that the storage in silica gel is not the best option for sampling P. insignis leaves if the goal is to isolate high-quality and pure DNA and that leaves freezing could be the best sampling method for genetic studies with P. insignis. Our data also evidenced a new method to isolate high-quality but in intermediate-quantity DNA from young roots meristematic tissue. In P. insignis, the emergence of the aerial part occurs slowly and unevenly, taking 2 to 5 months, due to a peculiar type of dormancy that occurs in the plumule region of bacuri seeds (Carvalho and Nascimento, 2018). But seeds undergo a period of vigorous growth of the primary root, whereas more meristematic root tissue can be sampled, without compromising the future seedling.

This research contributes to the optimization of DNA extraction techniques for P. insignis, supporting molecular marker-assisted selection in breeding, population genetics, and conservation programs for this threatened Amazonian species of nutritional, social, and economic significance in northern and northeastern Brazil

Data Availability Statement

The research data are only available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  • ABUBAKAR, B.M., IZHAM, N.H.M., SALLEH, F.M., OMAR, M.S.S. and WAGIRAN, A., 2018. Comparison of different DNA extraction methods from leaves and roots of Eurycoma longifolia plant. Advanced Science Letters, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 3641-3645. http://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11456
    » http://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11456
  • ALVES, K.F.L., LIMA, A.D.S., RIVAS, P.M.S., ALBUQUERQUE, I.C., PINHEIRO, J.F., CATUNDA, P.H.A., FELIPE, S.H.S., REIS, F.O., BATISTA, D.S., HENSCHEL, J.M., FIGUEIREDO, F.A.M.M.A., RODRIGUES, A.A.C., CORRÊA, T.R. and FERRAZ, T.M., 2025. Platonia insignis: a systematic synthesis of scientific studies on its biology, ecology, and potential applications. Plants, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 884. http://doi.org/10.3390/plants14060884 PMid:40265808.
    » http://doi.org/10.3390/plants14060884
  • ALZATE-MARIN, A.L., GUIDUGLI, M.C., SORIANI, H.H., MARTINEZ, C.A. and MESTRINER, M.A., 2009. An efficient and rapid DNA minipreparation procedure suitable for PCR/SSR and RAPD analyses in tropical forest tree species. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1217-1224. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132009000500020
    » http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132009000500020
  • CARVALHO, J.E.U.D. and NASCIMENTO, W., 2018. Inovações tecnológicas na propagação do açaizeiro e do bacurizeiro. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, vol. 40, e-679. http://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452018679
    » http://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452018679
  • DEMEKE, T. and JENKINS, G.R., 2010. Influence of DNA extraction methods, PCR inhibitors and quantification methods on real-time PCR assay of biotechnology-derived traits. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 396, no. 6, pp. 1977-1990. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3150-9 PMid:19789856.
    » http://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3150-9
  • DOYLE, J.J. and DOYLE, J.L., 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 13-15.
  • FUNK, V.A., GOSTEL, M., DEVINE, A., KELLOFF, C.L., WURDACK, K., TUCCINARDI, C., RADOSAVLJEVIC, A., PETERS, M. and CODDINGTON, J., 2017. Guidelines for collecting vouchers and tissues intended for genomic work (Smithsonian Institution): botany best practices. Biodiversity Data Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, e11625. http://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11625 PMid:28325986.
    » http://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11625
  • HALE, H., GARDNER, E.M., VIRUEL, J., POKORNY, L. and JOHNSON, M.G., 2020. Strategies for reducing per-sample costs in target capture sequencing for phylogenomics and population genomics in plants. Applications in Plant Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, e11337. http://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11337 PMid:32351798.
    » http://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11337
  • LIMA, S.K.R., COÊLHO, A.G., LUCARINI, M., DURAZZO, A. and ARCANJO, D.D.R., 2022. Platonia insignis Mart. as the promising Brazilian ‘Amazon gold’: the state-of-the-art and prospects. Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1827. http://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111827
    » http://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111827
  • NASCIMENTO, W.F., DEQUIGIOVANNI, G., RAMOS, S.L., GARCIA, C.B. and VEASEY, E.A., 2021. Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites reveal high genetic diversity and structure in Platonia insignis Mart., an endangered species native to the Brazilian Amazon. Acta Botanica Brasílica, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 432-444. http://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062020abb0324
    » http://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062020abb0324
  • PONTES, L.C.G., MOURA, E.F., MOURA, M.F., RODRIGUES, S.D.M., OLIVEIRA, M.D.S.P.D., CARVALHO, J.E.U.D. and THERRIER, J., 2017. Molecular characterization of progenies of bacurizeiro (Platonia insignis) from Marajó Island, northeastern Amazon. Acta Amazonica, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 293-300. http://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201701302
    » http://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201701302
  • PRATYUSHA, S., 2022. Phenolic compounds in the plant development and defense: an overview. In: M. HASANUZZAMAN and K. NAHAR, eds. Plant stress physiology: perspectives in agriculture London: IntechOpen. http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102873
    » http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102873
  • QUIÑONES, K.J.O., GENTALLAN JUNIOR, R.P., TIMOG, E.B.S., CRUZ, J.R.A.V., MACABECHA, C.G.A., PAPA, I.A., CORONADO, N.B., BARTOLOME, M.C.B., CERIBO, D.B., MADAYAG, R.E., MAGTOLTOL, J.B., SIENES, R.K.A., ALVARAN, B.B.S. and BORROMEO, T.H., 2024. Liquid-nitrogen-free CTAB DNA extraction method from silica-dried specimens for next-generation sequencing and assembly. MethodsX, vol. 12, pp. 102758. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102758 PMid:38883586.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102758
  • ROCHA, F.A.T., SILVA, L.H.M. and RODRIGUES, A.M.C., 2024. Bacuri (Platonia insignis Mart.): nutritional values, volatile compounds, rheological properties, health benefits, and potential products. Food Chemistry, vol. 436, pp. 137528. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137528 PMid:37847960.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137528
  • SAHU, S.K., THANGARAJ, M. and KATHIRESAN, K., 2012. DNA extraction protocol for plants with high levels of secondary metabolites and polysaccharides without using liquid nitrogen and phenol. ISRN Molecular Biology, vol. 2012, no. 1, pp. 205049. http://doi.org/10.5402/2012/205049 PMid:27335662.
    » http://doi.org/10.5402/2012/205049
  • SANTOS, E.M. and ARAUJO, R.R., 2017 [viewed 5 September 2024]. Testes de comparação de protocolos de extração de DNA e de maceração de tecido de Platonia insignis Mart. (Clusiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Biociência [online], vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 199-202. Available from: https://seer.ufrgs.br/rbrasbioci/article/download/114609/61914/474886
    » https://seer.ufrgs.br/rbrasbioci/article/download/114609/61914/474886
  • SARAIVA, R.C., ALBUQUERQUE, P.C. and GIRNOS, E.C., 2013. Floral and vegetative morphometrics of three Platonia insignis Mart. (Clusiaceae) populations, a native tree from the Brazilian Amazon. Plant Biosystems, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 666-674. http://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2013.791648
    » http://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2013.791648
  • SCHENK, J.J., BECKLUND, L.E., CAREY, S.J. and FABRE, P.P., 2023. What is the “modified” CTAB protocol? Characterizing modifications to the CTAB DNA extraction protocol. Applications in Plant Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, e11517. http://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11517 PMid:37342162.
    » http://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11517

Edited by

  • Editor:
    Jairo Lizandro Schmitt

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    06 Oct 2025
  • Date of issue
    2025

History

  • Received
    18 Mar 2025
  • Accepted
    29 July 2025
Creative Common - by 4.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
location_on
Instituto Internacional de Ecologia R. Bento Carlos, 750, 13560-660 São Carlos SP - Brasil, Tel. e Fax: (55 16) 3362-5400 - São Carlos - SP - Brazil
E-mail: bjb@bjb.com.br
rss_feed Stay informed of issues for this journal through your RSS reader
Go to top Report error