SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 suppl.1Transtornos relacionados ao uso de álcool e fatores associados em zona rural do BrasilAtividade física na população rural de Pelotas, RS: prevalência e fatores associados índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista de Saúde Pública

versão impressa ISSN 0034-8910versão On-line ISSN 1518-8787

Resumo

MARTINS-SILVA, Thais; MOLA, Christian Loret de; VAZ, Juliana dos Santos  e  TOVO-RODRIGUES, Luciana. General and abdominal obesity in adults living in a rural area in Southern Brazil. Rev. Saúde Pública [online]. 2018, vol.52, suppl.1, 7s.  Epub 17-Set-2018. ISSN 1518-8787.  http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000264.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of general and abdominal obesity and the concomitant presence of both outcomes and their determinants among adults living in a rural area.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, population-based study was carried out in a medium-sized city in the southern region of Brazil. We evaluated three outcomes: general obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ), abdominal obesity (waist circumference ≥ 102 cm and ≥ 88 cm in men and women, respectively), and concomitant obesities, classified as: no risk, only one risk factor, and aggregate factors. We performed crude and adjusted Poisson regression analyses for each obesity outcome and multinomial logistic regression for metabolic risk. We considered demographic and socioeconomic characteristics as independent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 1,433 individuals were included in the study. Of them, 29.5% presented general obesity and 37.8% presented abdominal obesity. We observed the presence of a risk factor in 15.8% of the sample, while 25.8% presented aggregate factors. The risk of general and abdominal obesity and concomitant outcomes increased significantly with age in both sexes. Richer men were at increased risk for general obesity (PR = 1.7; 95%CI 1.0–2.9), abdominal obesity (PR = 1.8; 95%CI 1.1–2.9), and aggregate factors (OR = 1.9; 95%CI 1.4–5.8). An education level of twelve years or more was a protective factor for women in relation to abdominal obesity (PR = 0.4; 95%CI 0.2–0.8) and aggregate factors (OR = 0.2; 95%CI 0.05–0.7). Rural activity reduced the risk of general obesity (PR = 0.6; 95%CI 0.5–0.8) and aggregate factors (OR = 0.5; 95%CI 0.3–0.8) in women, and the risk of abdominal obesity (PR = 0.6; 95%CI 0.5–0.8) and presence of a risk factor (OR = 0.5; 95%CI 0.3–0.7) in men. Skin color and time lived in rural areas were not statistically associated with the outcomes studied.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed high prevalences of general and abdominal obesity in this population, which is consistent with the values found in urban populations. However, rural activities were a protective factor for obesity outcomes.

Palavras-chave : Adult; Obesity; Obesity, Abdominal, Epidemiology; Body Mass Index; Waist Circumference; Risk Factors; Rural Population.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português | Inglês     · Português ( pdf ) | Inglês ( pdf )