SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 issue6Evaluation of light intensity and maintenance of light curing units used in clinics in the city of RecifeOral conditions and body weight in children from a public school in Manaus, AM, Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista de Odontologia da UNESP

On-line version ISSN 1807-2577

Abstract

SANTIAGO, Thais Mazeu et al. Volumetric and cephalometric evaluation of the upper airway of class III patients submitted to maxillary advancement. Rev. odontol. UNESP [online]. 2016, vol.45, n.6, pp.356-361.  Epub Nov 28, 2016. ISSN 1807-2577.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.05816.

Introduction

Anteroposterior maxillary deficiency can be associated with a decrease of upper airway volume. Maxillary advancement can improve the upper airway space.

Aim

To correlate cephalometric (2D) and volumetric (3D) measurements of the upper airway in class III patients treated by maxillary advancement.

Material and method

This retrospective transversal study was performed in ten adult patients submitted to maxillary advancement for correction of class III deformity secondary to maxillary anteroposterior deficiency. The Cone beam tomography files included in the medical records were used: (T1) pre-operative and (T2) 6 to 8 months postoperative. The DICOM files were imported and reconstructed for volumetric and cephalometric evaluation of the upper airway, as divided into nasopharynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx (Arnett & Gunson FAB Surgery).

Result

Age ranged from 26 to 55 years with a mean of 36.3±9.2 years. There were no statistically significant differences for cephalometric and volumetric parameters of the three pharyngeal regions between T1 and T2 periods. This was due to the small amount of maxillary advancement necessary to correct the maxillary deformity in the studied patients (4.7±1.89mm). The correlation between area and volume was not statistically significant only for preoperative measurements of the nasopharynx (r=0.30, p=0.40). It was significant for the other regions and evaluation periods (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Small maxillary advancements do not result in significant increases in airway dimensions.

Keywords : Orthognathic surgery; airway remodeling; retrognathia.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )