SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.73 issue11Improvement initiative in stroke careErratum author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Print version ISSN 0004-282XOn-line version ISSN 1678-4227

Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr. vol.73 no.11 São Paulo Nov. 2015  Epub Oct 06, 2015

https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20150147 

OPINIONS

Lean thinking to mind the gap in healthcare management

Pensamento enxuto na gestão da saúde

Li Min Li 1   2   3  

Sharon Johnson 1  

1Robert A. Foisie School of Business, Healthcare Delivery Institute, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester MA, USA;

2UMass Medical School, Worcester MA, USA;

3Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Campinas SP, Brazil.


We congratulate your team for your initiative to improve healthcare delivery to stroke patients1. The participation of multidisciplinary staff working at Gemba (where the work is done) is an excellent approach, discussing the strengths and weaknesses of care delivery, anticipating threats and looking for opportunities. We agree entirely with your views on quick-fixes, which may create work-arounds that do not address underlying issues. It is like prescribing a medication without a clear diagnosis or understanding of the problem. Healthcare management is strategic; in many areas of healthcare delivery, treatment efficacy and also safety take place outside the boundaries of pharmakinetics or procedures. Stroke patients are a good example. We know about rt-PA as a hyperacute ischaemic treatment, but in order for the medication to work safely, we engage in looking into each patient's 5 R's (right medication, right dose, right time, right route, right patient). In the United States, it has been estimated that over 98 thousand patients per year have died of medical errors2. One way to reduce this toll is to start with education about management and quality improvement, which is neglected in the Medicine curriculum. We need to mind the gap, and to move from intuitive “gut feelings”, to a logical, data-driven, stance in healthcare management. Lean thinking, derived from Toyota's Production System, has been adopted in many healthcare setting with success. Lean thinking is not a set of tools, but is rather a more philosophical approach towards management, founded on the concepts of relentless elimination of waste and continuous improvement. For example, eight broad types of waste have been identified, often summarized with the acronym DOWNTIME: Defect (give a wrong medication), Overproduction (ask for exams that are not needed), Waiting (a patient waiting for consultation, a surgical team waiting for an operating room), No use of staff (not listening to employee's suggestions), Transportation (patients need to go to several places), Inventory (expired medication), Motion (employee walks to distant areas to get supply), and Extra processing (generate duplicate documents). The Institute of Healthcare Improvement has developed a tool3 to help in identifying wastes in a hospital. Your group is on the Lean journey, not wasting the collective intelligence and looking to improve your work. We believe this effort is worthwhile, as it can provide more efficient and safer care for your patients as well as an improved work environment for your staff.

References

Spagnol GS, Valler L, Avellar WM. Improvement initiative in stroke care. Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2015;73(11):XX-XX. doi:10.1590/0004-282X20150144 [ Links ]

Donaldson MS. An overview of to err is human: re-emphasizing the message of patient safety. In: Hughes, RG, editor. Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based for nurses. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Chapter 3. [ Links ]

Resar RK, Griffin FA, Kabcenell A, Bone C. Hospital inpatient waste identification tool. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Massachusetts; 2011. [ Links ]

Support: Li Li Min is recipient of FAPESP Scholarship 2014/10911-3.

Received: July 28, 2015; Accepted: August 17, 2015

Correspondence: Li Li Min; Foisie School of Business, Washburn Shops 215, 100 Institute Road; 01609 Worcester MA, USA; E-mail:limin@fcm.unicamp.br

Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest to declare.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.