SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 issue10Pulmonary hypertension due to acute respiratory distress syndromeSerum uric acid and disorders of glucose metabolism: the role of glycosuria author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

On-line version ISSN 1414-431X

Braz J Med Biol Res vol.47 no.10 Ribeirão Preto Oct. 2014  Epub Aug 15, 2014

https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20143431 

Clinical Investigation

Effects of bromopride on expression of metalloproteinases and interleukins in left colonic anastomoses: an experimental study

S.M. Silva1 

M.S. Jerônimo2 

I. Silva-Pereira3 

A.L. Bocca3 

J.B. Sousa4 

1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil

2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Patologia Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil

3Departamento de Biologia Celular, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil

4Departamento de Clínica Cirúrgica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil


ABSTRACT

Anastomotic dehiscence is the most severe complication of colorectal surgery. Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and interleukins (ILs) can be used to analyze the healing process of anastomosis. To evaluate the effects of bromopride on MMP and cytokine gene expression in left colonic anastomoses in rats with or without induced abdominal sepsis, 80 rats were divided into two groups for euthanasia on the third or seventh postoperative day (POD). They were then divided into subgroups of 20 rats for sepsis induction or not, and then into subgroups of 10 rats for administration of bromopride or saline. Left colonic anastomosis was performed and abdominal sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture. A colonic segment containing the anastomosis was removed for analysis of gene expression of MMP-1α, MMP-8, MMP-13, IL-β, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ). On the third POD, bromopride was associated with increased MMP-1α, MMP-13, IL-6, IFN-γ, and IL-10 gene expression. On the seventh POD, all MMP transcripts became negatively modulated and all IL transcripts became positively modulated. In the presence of sepsis, bromopride administration increased MMP-8 and IFN-γ gene expression and decreased MMP-1, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 gene expression on the third POD. On the seventh POD, we observed increased expression of MMP-13 and all cytokines, except for TNF-α. In conclusion, bromopride interferes with MMP and IL gene expression during anastomotic healing. Further studies are needed to correlate these changes with the healing process.

Key words: Bromopride; Matrix metalloproteinases; Interleukins; Surgical anastomosis; Sepsis; Rats

Introduction

Anastomotic dehiscence is the most feared complication of colorectal surgery and may affect 2.4% to 3.8% of patients undergoing this procedure (1,2). Several experimental studies have been conducted to assess colonic anastomotic healing as well as factors contributing to anastomotic failure, such as fecal contamination and drug administration (3,4).

Prokinetic agents are often used in the early postoperative period to assist in gastric emptying and to accelerate the resolution of paralytic ileus, especially after intestinal surgery (5,6). The prokinetic drug class includes substituted benzamides, such as metoclopramide (methoxy-2-chloro-5-procainamide) and bromopride (4-amino-5-bromo-N-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-2-methoxybenzamide), which act as dopamine antagonists. These drugs have both antiemetic and motility-stimulating effects (7). Bromopride is considered a good alternative to metoclopramide and other antidopaminergic drugs, with fewer reports of extrapyramidal side effects.

There is no consensus in the literature about the mechanism of action of prokinetic agents on anastomotic healing. García-Olmo et al. (8) investigated the effects of pharmacological manipulation of postoperative intestinal motility on the resistance of colonic anastomoses and concluded that the use of metoclopramide was associated with fewer adhesions to the anastomosis and, consequently, with a significant decrease in anastomotic resistance 4 days after surgery.

Conversely, in previous studies we found that administration of bromopride in the presence or absence of sepsis was associated with decreased tensile strength of left colonic anastomoses in rats 3 days after surgery, with no changes in adhesion formation (9,10), suggesting that other mechanisms may be involved. Therefore, the study of other healing parameters to elucidate the real action of bromopride on the healing process is needed.

Wound repair activates multiple biological pathways that can restore tissue integrity in a sequence of events and consists of three overlapping phases: inflammation, formation of new tissues, and remodeling (11).

In the inflammatory phase that dominates the healing process within the first days after wounding, leukocytes produce large amounts of cytokines that interact to determine the vigor of the inflammatory response (12). These interactions are complex and produce both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. The former include tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-8, while the latter include IL-4 and IL-10. The imbalance of cytokine action during healing could explain anastomotic failure.

Collagen deposition is a further key mechanism of wound healing (13). It is the most essential basal, skeletal protein involved in the healing process (11). Metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of endopeptidases involved in the degradation of extracellular matrix components (14), coagulation, immunity, inflammation, angiogenesis, tissue removal, connective tissue remodeling, and epithelial cell and fibroblast migration (15,16). MMP-1, MMP-8, and MMP-13 are collagenases that cleave types I and III collagen fibers (14). An increased presence of active forms of MMPs may lead to localized matrix degradation and a transient loss of anastomotic strength, thus leading to anastomotic dehiscence (17).

This study aimed to investigate whether the effect of bromopride on anastomotic healing could be explained by changes in MMP or cytokine gene expression caused by the drug.

Material and Methods

The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Instituto de Ciências Biologicas, Universidade de Brasília, (UnBDOC protocol No. 67336/2009), Brazil. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Brazilian Guidelines for Use of Animals in Research.

Animals

Eighty healthy male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) were used in the study. The animals were 90 to 120 days of age at the beginning of the experiment. For 2 weeks preoperatively, the animals were housed in cages with 5 animals each, kept under a standard 12:12-h artificial light-dark cycle, and had free access to water and standard chow. There was no preoperative fasting period.

Experimental protocol

The rats were randomly divided into two groups of 40 animals each for euthanasia on the third or seventh postoperative day (POD). Further randomization was performed, and the animals were divided into subgroups of 20 rats each for sepsis induction or not, and then into subgroups of 10 rats each for administration of bromopride or saline (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Allocation of animals to groups and subgroups. 

General anesthesia was performed with 10 mg/kg xylazine hydrochloride and 75 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride administered intramuscularly. All surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon.

The surgical site was shaved and disinfected with povidone-iodine. Clean, nonsterile surgical instruments were used. A 4.0-cm midline laparotomy incision was made, starting 1.0 cm above the external genitalia. The distal colon was exposed, and a 0.5-cm segment of the left colon (2.5 to 3.0 cm above the peritoneal reflection) was resected, followed by end-to-end anastomosis of the resulting segment, in a single transmural plane, using a continuous 6-0 polypropylene suture and a cylindrical needle.

After anastomosis, abdominal sepsis was experimentally induced in all rats in the sepsis group using the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) method, as described by Rittirsch et al. (18), where one-half of the cecum was ligated using 3-0 silk suture (Shalon, Brazil). The end of the cecum, located distal to the ligation, was punctured at 10 random sites using an 18G×1.5- (40×12 mm) venipuncture needle, and some fecal content was extruded. The abdominal wall was closed in two planes with a simple running suture (3-0 silk suture).

Animals that died within the first 24 postoperative hours were excluded from the study. Metamizole sodium monohydrate (20 mg/kg) was added to the animals' water for analgesia until the day of euthanasia. No antibiotics were used.

After the operations, animals in the experimental subgroups received bromopride at a dose of 1 mg/100 g subcutaneously every 12 h until the day of euthanasia. Control animals received identical amounts of saline subcutaneously every 12 h.

Reoperation was performed on the scheduled day for each subgroup. After exposure of the abdominal cavity, signs of anastomotic dehiscence were evaluated. A 4.0-cm colonic segment, with the anastomosis at the center, was removed as a whole together with any adherent structures. For euthanasia, the rats received an overdose of 150 mg/kg sodium thiopental injected directly into the inferior vena cava.

Specimen preparation

After resection of the adherent structures, specimens were opened at the antimesenteric border and divided into longitudinal sections for later analysis of gene expression of MMP-1α, MMP-8, MMP-13, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ).

The anastomotic segment was macerated in TRI Reagent solution (Applied Biosystems, USA), and RNA was isolated by a single extraction with a phenol-chloroform mixture and treated with Promega DNAse in the presence of an RNAse inhibitor (Promega, catalog #M6101; Lot# 262753; USA) in order to remove all traces of residual genomic DNA contamination, according to the protocol. Equal amounts of 0.4 µg RNA were subjected to reverse transcription with High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kits (Applied Biosystems).

Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Amplification of cDNA sequences was performed using the PCR Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems) containing the SYBR Green intercalating agent, a fluorescent molecule that intercalates into double-stranded DNA after initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, followed by 60°C for 1 min.

To confirm amplification specificity, PCR products were analyzed by denaturation curves or melting curves. Comparisons were made using the threshold cycle or crossing point (19) method with cyclophilin to normalize values in order to assess the variation in fold-change expression of each gene. The fold-change expression represents the ratio of the measured value for the treated animals to the value for the nontreated cohorts. Values greater than 2.0 were considered positively modulated, whereas values less than 0.5 were negatively modulated. We considered that there was no change in gene expression in the range between these values. Reactions were performed in triplicate for all genes analyzed. All oligonucleotide pairs were designed using the Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems; listed in Table 1).

Results

Effects of bromopride on nonseptic (NS) rats

There were no deaths in either group on the third or seventh POD. One animal in the NS3 group and one in the NS7 group had anastomotic leakage blocked by adjacent organs, which was noticed only after opening the surgical specimen. No animals in the control group had anastomotic leakage.

Administration of bromopride was associated with increased expression of MMP-1α and MMP-13 on the third POD. On the seventh POD, transcripts of all MMPs of all treated animals became negatively modulated (Table 2).

Administration of bromopride positively modulated IL-6, IFN-γ, and IL-10 gene expression on the third POD and gene expression of all ILs on the seventh POD, especially IL-1β (Table 2).

Effects of bromopride on septic rats

There were no deaths among animals euthanized on the third POD. There was one death in each subgroup of animals scheduled to be euthanized on the seventh POD, none of them because of complications related to anastomosis.

On the third POD, one anastomotic dehiscence blocked by omentum and adjacent organs occurred in the bromopride-treated subgroup, and one free dehiscence, with the presence of feces in the abdominal cavity, occurred in the control subgroup. On the seventh POD, each subgroup showed one case of blocked anastomotic dehiscence.

On the third POD, administration of bromopride was associated with increased MMP-8 gene expression and decreased MMP-13 gene expression. On the seventh POD, only MMP-13 gene expression was increased (Table 2).

On the third POD, administration of bromopride was associated with increased IFN-γ gene expression and decreased TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 gene expression. On the seventh POD, gene expression of all cytokines was positively modulated, except for TNF-α (Table 2).

Discussion

Bromopride is a prokinetic agent that is often used in the postoperative period, but its effect on the healing process has not been completely elucidated.

In the present study, administration of bromopride increased expression of MMP-1α and MMP-13 in the absence of abdominal sepsis and of MMP-8 in the presence of abdominal sepsis on the third POD. During the same period, MMP-13 gene expression decreased under septic conditions. On the seventh POD, transcripts of all MMPs of bromopride-treated animals became negatively modulated in the absence of abdominal sepsis, while MMP-13 gene expression increased in the presence of sepsis.

Increased rates of anastomotic dehiscence have been reported in patients with increased MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 levels in perioperative colonic biopsies (20). Stumpf et al. (21) demonstrated increased MMP-13 levels in intestinal samples of patients with anastomotic dehiscence compared to patients who did not have this complication, with no differences in MMP-1 levels between groups. Pasternak et al. (22) measured MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-13 gene expression in the postoperative intraperitoneal fluid of patients after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer and found increased MMP-8 and MMP-9 levels in patients who developed dehiscence. Evaluations based on immunohistochemistry and zymography demonstrated increased levels of MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, and MMP-9 in colonic anastomoses of rats (23), whereas MMP-10 and MMP-13 were not associated with the healing of intestinal anastomoses (24).

In a previous study, we found that positive modulation of MMP-1α and negative modulation of MMP-8 gene expression were associated with loss of anastomotic strength of left colonic anastomoses in rats after CLP-induced abdominal sepsis on the third POD. On the seventh POD, anastomotic breaking strength in the same group was higher than that in saline-treated animals, but MMP-1α and MMP-8 gene expression remained unaltered (25). We can assume that the MMP effect on anastomotic healing is not dependent on the action of an isolated MMP, but is the result of the interaction of different classes of endopeptidases. Moreover, the study of MMP activity by immunohistochemical staining or mRNA analysis does not necessarily mean that matrix degradation will occur, since strict control of MMP activity is preserved when MMPs are released as inactive proenzymes or by the presence of inhibitors (26).

Several authors have analyzed the variation in cytokine levels postoperatively and the occurrence of complications (27,28). Herwig et al. (28) reported a marked increase in IL-6 and TNF-α levels, which may be regarded as a precursor event that occurs days before the secondary clinical signs of anastomotic leakage. The authors also reported that the increase in IL-1β cytokine levels became statistically significant on the third POD in patients with anastomotic dehiscence (28). In addition, a positive correlation has been described between IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α levels and prolonged operative time, blood loss, and bacterial contamination of peritoneal fluid (29).

In the present study, in the absence of sepsis, administration of bromopride positively modulated IL-6, IFN-γ, and IL-10 gene expression on the third POD and gene expression of all ILs on the seventh POD. In the group of septic animals, administration of bromopride was associated with increased IFN-γ gene expression and decreased TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 gene expression on the third POD. On the seventh POD, gene expression of all cytokines was positively modulated, except for TNF-α.

Therefore, we were not able to define a cytokine profile (pro- or anti-inflammatory) that could be responsible for the loss of strength of colonic anastomoses in the rat on the third POD during bromopride administration, since there is no consensus on which ILs are the most important cytokines in each phase of the healing process. It is worth mentioning, however, that detection of cytokine gene expression or even cytokine levels in tissues or secretions does not always correlate with its biological activity. Instead of being produced, cytokines may have been released as inactive proenzymes or may have already been degraded (30).

In conclusion, bromopride interferes with MMP and IL gene expression during anastomotic healing. Further studies are needed to correlate these changes with the healing process.

References

1. Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G. The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 71-79, doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01002.x. [ Links ]

2. Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M, Bucher P, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P. Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 265-270, doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0399-3. [ Links ]

3. Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 549-573, doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70568-5. [ Links ]

4. de Sousa JB, Soares EG, Aprilli F. Effects of diclofenac sodium on intestinal anastomotic healing. Experimental study on the small intestine of rabbits. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 613-617, doi: 10.1007/BF02049903. [ Links ]

5. Verlinden M, Michiels G, Boghaert A, de Coster M, Dehertog P. Treatment of postoperative gastrointestinal atony. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 614-617, doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740727. [ Links ]

6. Jian R, Ducrot F, Piedeloup C, Mary JY, Najean Y, Bernier JJ. Measurement of gastric emptying in dyspeptic patients: effect of a new gastrokinetic agent (cisapride). Gut 1985; 26: 352-358, doi: 10.1136/gut.26.4.352. [ Links ]

7. Longo WE, Vernava AM III. Prokinetic agents for lower gastrointestinal motility disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 696-708, doi: 10.1007/BF02238599. [ Links ]

8. García-Olmo D, Paya J, Lucas FJ, García-Olmo DC. The effects of the pharmacological manipulation of postoperative intestinal motility on colonic anastomoses. An experimental study in a rat model. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997; 12: 73-77, doi: 10.1007/s003840050084. [ Links ]

9. Marques e Silva S, Ferreira VM, Carneiro FP, Feres O, de Oliveira PG, de Sousa JB. Effects of bromopride on the healing of left colon anastomoses of rats. Rev Col Bras Cir 2011; 38: 429-434. [ Links ]

10. Silva SM, Carneiro FP, Oliveira PG, Morais PH, Silva NG, Sousa JB. Effects of bromopride on the healing of left colonic anastomoses in rats with induced abdominal sepsis. Acta Cir Bras 2012; 27: 370-375, doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502012000600003. [ Links ]

11. Krzesniak N, Paziewska A, Rubel T, Skrzypczak M, Mikula M, Dzwonek A, et al. Gene expression alterations induced by low molecular weight heparin during bowel anastomosis healing in rats. Acta Biochim Pol 2011; 58: 79-87. [ Links ]

12. Bertram P, Junge K, Schachtrupp A, Gotze C, Kunz D, Schumpelick V. Peritoneal release of TNFalpha and IL-6 after elective colorectal surgery and anastomotic leakage. J Invest Surg 2003; 16: 65-69, doi: 10.1080/08941930390194398. [ Links ]

13. Kuper MA, Scholzl N, Traub F, Mayer P, Weinreich J, Coerper S, et al. Everolimus interferes with the inflammatory phase of healing in experimental colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res 2011; 167: 158-165, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.07.013. [ Links ]

14. Stamenkovic I. Extracellular matrix remodelling: the role of matrix metalloproteinases. J Pathol 2003; 200: 448-464, doi: 10.1002/path.1400. [ Links ]

15. Agren MS, Jorgensen LN, Delaisse JM. Matrix metalloproteinases and colon anastomosis repair: a new indication for pharmacological inhibition? Mini Rev Med Chem 2004; 4: 769-778. [ Links ]

16. Parks WC. Matrix metalloproteinases in repair. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7: 423-432, doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00423.x. [ Links ]

17. de Hingh I, Siemonsma MA, de Man BM, Lomme RM, Hendriks T. The matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BB-94 improves the strength of intestinal anastomoses in the rat. Int J Colorectal Dis 2002; 17: 348-354, doi: 10.1007/s00384-002-0418-3. [ Links ]

18. Rittirsch D, Huber-Lang MS, Flierl MA, Ward PA. Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 31-36, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.214. [ Links ]

19. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001; 25: 402-408, doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [ Links ]

20. Stumpf M, Klinge U, Wilms A, Zabrocki R, Rosch R, Junge K, et al. Changes of the extracellular matrix as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after large bowel surgery. Surgery 2005; 137: 229-234, doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.07.011. [ Links ]

21. Stumpf M, Cao W, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Kasperk R, Schumpelick V. Collagen distribution and expression of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 13 in patients with anastomotic leakage after large-bowel surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2002; 386: 502-506, doi: 10.1007/s00423-001-0255-9. [ Links ]

22. Pasternak B, Matthiessen P, Jansson K, Andersson M, Aspenberg P. Elevated intraperitoneal matrix metalloproteinases-8 and -9 in patients who develop anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: e93-e98. [ Links ]

23. Shaper KR, Savage FJ, Hembry RM, Boulos PB. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases in a model of colonic wound healing in a rabbit. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1857-1866, doi: 10.1007/BF02234468. [ Links ]

24. Vaalamo M, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML, Puolakkainen P, Kere J, Saarialho-Kere U. Distinct expression profiles of stromelysin-2 (MMP-10), collagenase-3 (MMP-13), macrophage metalloelastase (MMP-12), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP-3) in intestinal ulcerations. Am J Pathol 1998; 152: 1005-1014. [ Links ]

25. Silva SM, Jeronimo MS, Silva-Pereira I, Bocca AL, Sousa JB. Expression of metalloproteinases and interleukins on anastomoses in septic rats. J Surg Res 2013; 183: 777-782, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.012. [ Links ]

26. Brew K, Dinakarpandian D, Nagase H. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: evolution, structure and function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1477: 267-283, doi: 10.1016/S0167-4838(99)00279-4. [ Links ]

27. Baker EA, El-Gaddal S, Williams L, Leaper DJ. Profiles of inflammatory cytokines following colorectal surgery: relationship with wound healing and outcome. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14: 566-572, doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00163.x. [ Links ]

28. Herwig R, Glodny B, Kuhle C, Schluter B, Brinkmann OA, Strasser H, et al. Early identification of peritonitis by peritoneal cytokine measurement. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 514-521, doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6231-z. [ Links ]

29. Tsukada K, Katoh H, Shiojima M, Suzuki T, Takenoshita S, Nagamachi Y. Concentrations of cytokines in peritoneal fluid after abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 1993; 159: 475-479. [ Links ]

30. Witte MB, Barbul A. Repair of full-thickness bowel injury. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: S538-S546, doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000081436.09826.A4. [ Links ]

First published online August 15, 2014.

Received: August 6, 2013; Accepted: June 2, 2014

Correspondence: S.M. Silva, SQS 405, Bloco B, Apto 205, 70239-020 Brasília, DF, Brasil, +55-61-3244-4271. E-mail: silvismarques@yahoo.com.br

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.