Bryophyte flora in upland forests at different successional stages and in the various strata of host trees in northeastern Pará, Brazil

ARTICLES

Bryophyte flora in upland forests at different successional stages and in the various strata of host trees in northeastern Pará, Brazil¹

Ana Cláudia Caldeira Tavares-Martins^I,*; Regina Célia Lobato Lisboa^II; Denise Pinheiro da Costa^III

^IUniversidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil

^IIMuseu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, PA, Brazil

^IIIInstituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

ABSTRACT

In the northeastern region of the Brazilian state of Pará, approximately 90% of the forested areas are secondary forests. Secondary forests are interesting areas for floristic studies aimed at determining the effects that clear-cutting has on bryophyte communities. The aim of this study was to compare upland forests at different successional stages and the various strata of host trees, in terms of the bryophyte species composition. Bryophyte specimens were collected between August 2005 and September 2006 from host trees in primary and secondary forests of different ages and of different heights, within the municipality of Capitão Poço, in the state of Pará. The vertical distribution of bryophytes was evaluated in 15 host trees within the primary forest. We identified a total of 99 bryophyte species: 33 mosses and 66 liverworts. The dominant family was Lejeuneaceae, with 56 species. Most of the species (n = 60) had a neotropical distribution, and 3 species were endemic to Brazil. Cololejeunea minutissima var. myriocarpa (Nees & Mont.) R.M.Schust., Pycnolejeunea papillosa X.-L. He, Radula mammosa Spruce and Verdoornianthus marsupiifolius (Spruce) Gradst. represent new records for the state of Pará. In the successional forests evaluated, we identified 78 species, most of which (n = 38) occurred in primary forest. On the host tree trunks evaluated in the primary forest, we observed 31 species occurring at heights ranging from 2 m to 20 m. Despite the fact that secondary forests account for such a large proportion of the forested areas in Capitão Poço, we found that the bryoflora was relatively rich, comprising 31% of the species recorded for the state. The fact that 40% of the species recorded occurred exclusively in the secondary forests and the fact that 45.5% of the species recorded in primary forest occurred within the 2-20 m height range show the importance of studies focusing on bryophytes in secondary forests and in the upper strata of host trees in primary forests.

Key words: bryophytes, northeastern Pará, primary forests, secondary forests, vertical distribution

Introduction

Brazil has a rich bryoflora, with approximately 1,650 species, comprising 35% of all neotropical species, which have been estimated to number 4,700 (Gradstein et al. 2001, Gradstein & Costa 2003, Costa & Luizi-Ponzo 2010). In the Brazilian state of Pará, there are an estimated 317 species of bryophytes (Costa 2013), which correspond to approximately 20% of the bryophyte flora known in the country, demonstrating the level of knowledge and the importance of bryophytes in the state. The state of Pará is divided geographically into six mesoregions and 22 microregions (SEPOF 2008), and the mesoregion of the northeastern part of the state is one of the oldest agricultural frontiers in the Amazon, caused by the migration of northeasterners fleeing drought (IBGE 1991). The northeastern mesoregion comprises the microregions of Salgado, Bragantina, Cametá, Tomé-Açu and Guamá (IDESP 1992). Currently, the landscape of those microregions is highly disturbed due to subsistence farming of crops such as cassava, corn and rice (Wiesenmüller 2004). This dynamic gave rise to the appearance of ecosystems, at different successional stages, which are highly depleted in terms of genetic resources (Vieira 1996).

Regarding the bryoflora of northeastern Pará, Santos & Lisboa (2003) conducted a survey of mosses in eight municipalities within the Salgado, Bragantina and Guamá microregions. The same authors subsequently investigated whether bryophyte species could be employed as indicators of disturbed environments (Santos & Lisboa 2008). In another study, Lisboa & Santos (2005) published the first record of the genus Papillaria (Müll. Hal.) Müll. Hal. for the Amazon.

In the Chocoaré-Mato Grosso Extractive Reserve, located in the municipality of Santarém Novo, within the Bragantina microregion, the same authors observed a predominance of bryophyte species typical of disturbed habitats, cultivated areas and the forest canopy, indicating the high degree to which the area had been disturbed (Lisboa & Tavares 2008). The microregions of Cametá, Tomé-Açu and Guamá, all of which have been disturbed in large part, are the regions for which the least is known of the bryophyte flora and are therefore considered priority areas for the execution of future floristic inventories. The municipality of Capitão Poço, which is within the microregion of Guamá, is among the municipalities in northeastern Pará where there has been considerable deforestation, 64% of Capitão Poço having been deforested by 2007 (INPE 2009). The municipality encompasses upland areas, floodplains and swamps that have been progressively altered, only 2.5% of primary forests remaining, and are now dominated by secondary forests, which cover 43.1% of the total area (Wiesenmüller 2004). Currently, as in the other regions of northeastern Pará, the landscape of Capitão Poço presents a mosaic of secondary forests of different ages, as well as temporary and permanent pastures and plantations. These secondary forests are considered priority areas for the study of the local flora, given that epiphytes in disturbed areas have received little attention (Wolf 2005) and that there is a need for studies of ecological succession in neotropical bryophytes (Gradstein & Raeymaekers 2000).

In the Brazilian Amazon, there is a lack of studies involving bryophytes, not only of bryophyte species in secondary forests but also on the vertical distribution of bryophyte species on host trees (on the upper trunk and in the crown). Because bryophytes species in the forest canopy are difficult to access and have therefore been less widely studied, it is possible that some bryophytes are exclusive to the canopy (Rhoades 1995). Therefore, the study of such bryophytes could result in a more comprehensive inventory of the bryophyte flora of a given area.

In Brazil, studies of epiphytic bryophytes in host trees have been restricted to the Atlantic Forest biome and have been conducted in forests at different successional stages (Costa 1999) or in forest fragments in different states of conservation (Alvarenga et al. 2009). In the Brazilian Amazon, the first and only such study in preserved upland forests was conducted by Oliveira (2010), who reported that species richness was highest in the canopy and that species composition, at the base of the host tree trunk as well as in the canopy, is determined by environmental filters.

In the present study, we sought to identify the bryophytes species that occur in forests at different successional stages, as well as to determine their vertical distribution on their host trees. The objective of this study was to compare upland forests at different successional stages, as well as the various strata of host trees, in terms of the bryophyte species composition, in northern Brazil.

Material and methods

Study area

The municipality of Capitão Poço (01º44'54"S; 47º03'42"W) encompasses an area of approximately 2900 km², at an elevation of 40 m, and is the seventh largest municipality in Pará, in terms of area (SEPOF 2008). According to the Köppen system of classification, the climate of the region is type Am (Bastos et al. 1984), categorized as tropical monsoon climate. The mean monthly maximum temperature ranges from 28.7ºC to 30.2ºC, whereas the mean monthly minimum ranges from 24.9ºC to 29.8ºC (data obtained from the rainfall measurement station operated by CITROPAR - Cítricos do Pará S/A. The vegetation cover in the area is dense tropical rain forest, comprising areas of upland forest, floodplain forest and swamp forest (Wiesenmüller 2004, Almeida et al. 2005).

Sampling and evaluation of botanical material

Botanical material was collected in areas of upland forest between August 2005 and September 2006. We selected four areas of secondary forest of different successional ages (6, 10, 20 and 40 years, respectively) and one fragment of primary forest (with no evidence of timber extraction). For the comparison between primary and secondary forest, bryophyte specimens were randomly collected from the understory of both forest types, within a 2000 m² plot. The methods employed in the collection, storage and herbarium preservation of specimens followed Yano (1984a).

In order to evaluate the vertical distribution of bryophytes on host trees (which was studied only in the area of primary forest), we selected 15 host trees (located outside of the 2000 m² plot) whose crowns were visible from the understory, as recommended by Gradstein et al. (1996). From the base to the crown of each tree, we delineated 20 × 20 cm plots at 2 m vertical intervals, as described by Frahm (2003), within which we collected addition bryophyte specimens. Each host tree was therefore divided into three zones, by height: base; 2-10 m; and 12-20 m.

The botanical material was identified by reference to the studies conducted by Dauphin (2003), Engel & Smith Merrill (2004), Florschütz (1964), Florschütz-De Waard (1986; 1996), Florschütz-De Waard & Veling (1996), Fulford (1968), Gradstein (1994), Gradstein & Costa (2003), He (1999), Heinrichs et al. (1999), Ilkiu-Borges & Lisboa (2002a; 2002b; 2002c; 2002d; 2004), Inoue & Gradstein (1980), Lisboa (1993), Lisboa & Ilkiu-Borges (1997), Reese (1961; 1993), Reiner-Drehwald (1994; 1998; 2000; 2007), Reiner-Drehwald & Goda (2000), Reiner-Drehwald & Ilkiu-Borges (2007), Schuster (1980), Tixier (1980), Yamada (1993), Yano (1985). Mosses were classified according to Goffinet et al. (2009), and liverworts were classified according to Crandall-Stotler et al. (2009). The study specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the Research Institute of the Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden (code, RB) and the João Murça Pires Herbarium of the Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (code, MG).

Data analysis

We evaluated species richness, floristic composition, geographic distribution and vertical distribution of bryophyte species, as well as the relationship between primary and secondary forest. The distribution of taxa was determined in accordance with the information available in the online databases Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil (List of Species of the Brazilian Flora, Costa 2013) and Banco de Briófitas do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Rio de Janeiro State Bryophyte Database, Costa et al. 2012a), as well as with the studies conducted by Gradstein & Costa (2003), Lisboa et al. (2006), Gradstein & Ilkiu-Borges (2009), Peralta & Yano (2011), Tavares et al. (2006), Yano (1984b; 1989; 1995; 2006; 2008; 2011a; 2011b) and Yano & Peralta (2011). The two-letter abbreviations of state names employed are those established the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics.

The relationship between primary and secondary forest was evaluated on the basis of quantitative and qualitative data related to the bryophyte species observed in each forest type. The comparison among the different vertical zones of the host trees was based on the bryophyte species richness observed in each zone.

When multiple specimens were collected for a species, we opted to cite only two voucher specimens. Species representing new records for the state of Pará are indicated with an asterisk and are illustrated.

Results and discussion

Overall species richness

Within the study area as a whole, we identified 99 bryophyte species (33 mosses and 66 liverworts), within 15 families and 47 genera (Tab. 1), representing approximately 31% of the known bryophyte flora in the state of Pará (Costa 2013). The species richness found in Capitão Poço was similar to that reported for other upland forests in the state, such as that within Caxiuanã National Forest, where 126 bryophyte species have been recorded (Lisboa & Nazaré 1997, 2002; Ilkiu-Borges & Lisboa 2002d; Alvarenga et al. 2007). In Capitão Poço, we identified 62 (49.2%) of those 126 species. Lisboa & Ilkiu-Borges (1995) also identified 126 bryophyte species in a variety of vegetation formations, including upland forest, on the outskirts of the city of Belém, also in the state of Pará. Of those, we identified 37 species (29.4%) in Capitão Poço. In the Guamá Ecological Research Area, known as the Mocambo Reserve, also near Belém, those same authors identified 113 bryophyte species (Lisboa & Ikiu-Borges 2007), 45 of which (39.8%) were also found to occur in our study area.

Despite the fact that the Capitão Poço region is dominated by secondary forest, we found that it has a rich bryophyte flora, comprising 31% of the species recorded for the state. In addition, the bryophyte species richness in the study area was similar to that reported for other areas in the state presenting varying degrees of conservation (37-50%).

Floristic composition

In our study area, the family Lejeuneaceae showed the highest species richness, with 56 of the 99 taxa identified. The importance of Lejeuneaceae has also been reported for the Amazon, Atlantic Forest, caatinga (shrublands) and pantanal (swampland) in Brazil, as well as for French Guiana (Lisboa et al. 2006; Lisboa & Ilkiu-Borges 2001, 2007; Lisboa & Tavares 2008; Yano & Câmara 2004; Pôrto et al. 2004; Campelo & Pôrto 2007; Siqueira et al. 2011; Costa et al. 2005; Valente et al. 2013; Câmara & Vital 2004; Gradstein 2006). In addition, Gradstein et al. (2001) reported that more than 70% of the liverwort species found in neotropical forests belong to Lejeuneaceae. In the present study, the most well-represented moss family was Calymperaceae, with 12 species, followed by Sematophyllaceae, with five (Fig. 1). Lisboa et al. (1998; 1999), Santos & Lisboa (2003) and Souza & Lisboa (2005; 2006) obtained similar results, and Gradstein et al. (2001) reported that Calymperaceae and Sematophyllaceae were among the four most well-represented moss families in areas of lowland moist forest.

Geographic distribution

We observed seven different patterns of geographic distribution (Fig. 2), the predominant pattern being neotropical, with 60 species, followed by pantropical, with 15, South American (restricted to the countries of South America), with 8, and the tropics of Africa and the Americas, with 10. Of the 99 species identified, three are exclusive to Brazil, two are widely distributed worldwide, and one is restricted to Brazil and French Guiana. Similar results have been obtained in studies conducted in various forest types in the Amazon, Atlantic Forest and other regions of South America (Ilkiu-Borges & Lisboa 2002d; Ilkiu-Borges et al. 2004; Valente & Pôrto 2006; Costa & Lima 2005; Rico & Pócs 2004; Parolly et al. 2004).

The species Micropterygium leiophyllum Spruce, Pycnolejeunea papillosa X.-L. He and Verdoornianthus marsupiifolius (Spruce) Gradst. are endemic to Brazil, the last two previously being reported only for the state of Amazonas (Gradstein & Costa 2003; Bastos 2012; Costa et al. 2012b) and here recorded for the first time for the state of Pará, as were Cololejeunea minutissima subsp. myriocarpa, (Nees & Mont.) R.M.Schust. and Radula mammosa Spruce (Fig. 3, 4 and 5). In Brazil, the species Microlejeunea acutifolia Steph. and Prionolejeunea muricatoserrulata (Spruce) Steph. occur exclusively in Pará.

Primary versus secondary forest

In the areas of successional forest evaluated, we identified 78 bryophyte species. Bryophyte species richness was higher in the primary forest, where 38 species were identified, than in any of the areas of secondary forest (Fig. 6). Analyzing the species identified in the areas of successional forest, we found that 23 (29.5%) occurred exclusively in the primary forest only, whereas 40 (51.3%) were exclusive to the areas of secondary forest (Tab. 1). The difference between primary and secondary forest, in terms of bryophyte species richness, has previously been reported in field studies. For example, in studies conducted in different types of tropical forests, Lisboa et al. (1987), Costa (1999) and Acebey et al. (2003) also reported that bryophyte species richness was lower in areas of secondary forest. The fact that approximately half of the species identified in the present study were exclusive to the areas of secondary forest underscores the importance of conducting additional studies in such areas, in order to determine which taxa are exclusive to those environments, given that such species appear to be more well-adapted to the environmental changes caused by agricultural activity in the region.

Vertical gradient

On the 15 host trees evaluated, we identified 68 bryophyte species. Of those, 37 were found to occur in the base zone of the tree, 11 being exclusive to that zone. In the 2-10 m zone, we identified 45 species, eight of which were exclusive to that zone. In the 12-20 m zone, we identified 44 species, 11 of which were exclusive to that zone. Only 20 species occurred in all three zones (Fig. 7). Among the 11 species that occurred exclusively in the 12-20 m zone, Harpalejeunea oxyphylla (Nees & Mont.) Steph., Radula javanica Gottsche, Symbiezidium transversale (Sw.) Trevis., Stictolejeunea squamata (Willd. ex. Weber) Schiffn. and Thysananthus amazonicus (Spruce) Schiffn were of note because they are species typical of open environments. The bryophytes that occurred only in the 2-10 m and 12-20 m zones, together with those that occurred exclusively in either of those two zones, totaled 31 species, accounting for 45.5% of the species identified on the host trees evaluated (Tab. 1). Therefore, at least within the area studied, collecting samples only from the base zone of host trees could result in an underestimation of the extent of the bryophyte flora. The presence of species that occur above a height of 2 m lends credence to the supposition made by Gradstein (1995), who suggested that bryophyte species richness can be underestimated in studies that do not involve sampling of the upper trunk and canopy of host trees.

Despite the fact that our study was conducted in region that had been deforested by extensive human activity, the species identified corresponded to 31% of the bryophyte flora of the state, as well as including species that represented new records for the state and species endemic to Brazil. Nevertheless, we also found that bryophyte species richness was lower in secondary forest than in primary forest. The fact that 45.5% of the species recorded in primary forest occurred within the 2-20 m height range shows the importance of sampling the upper trunk and canopy zones in floristic studies of bryophytes.

Our findings indicate the need for further floristic inventories of bryophytes in other areas of Amazon forest within the state of Pará, such as the southeastern and southwestern mesoregions. The data presented here increase the existing knowledge of the biological diversity within the state of Pará, by identifying species that are indicative of certain environments and including new records of species considered endemic, thus contributing to the implementation of conservation policies.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Ima Vieira, Eliane Leal and Arlete Almeida of the Large Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazônia (LBA) project, for obtaining the authorization and providing logistical support for the collection of specimens at the Capitão Poço study site; to the technicians Mário Rosa Júnior, Daniel Nascimento and Benedito Seabra, for assisting in the fieldwork; to Alcindo Martins Júnior, for assisting in the fieldwork and for providing the illustrations; and to Dr. Anna Luiza Ilkiu-Borges, for assisting with the illustrations and confirming the identity of some of the Lejeuneaeceae species. This study received financial suuport from the Brazilian National School of Tropical Botany and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development; scholarship to ACCT-M).

Received: 6 December, 2012

Accepted: 17 September, 2013

• Acebey, A.; Gradstein, S.R. & Krömer, T. 2003. Species richness and habitat diversification of bryophytes in submontane rain forest and fallows of Bolivia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:9-18.
• Almeida, A.S.; I.C.G. Vieira & N.S.H. Tancredi. 2005. Pp.1415-1422. Análise Ecológica da Paisagem do Leste do Pará. Anais XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Goiânia.
• Alvarenga, L.D.P.; Lisboa, R.C.L. & Tavares, A.C.C. 2007. Novas referências de hepáticas (Marchantiophyta) da Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã para o Estado do Pará, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 21(2):649-656.
• Alvarenga, L.D.P., Pôrto, K. & Oliveira,.J.R. (2009): Habitat loss effects on spatial distribution of non-vascular epiphytes in a Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 19(3):619-635.
• Bastos, C.J.P. 2012. Lejeuneaceae. In: Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. (http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/2012/FB097662).
• Bastos, T.X.; Diniz,T.D.A.S.; Kobayash, I.L.T. & Santos, A.R. 1984. Estudos Mesoclimáticos - Variação termopluviométrica em campos experimentais da EMBRAPA-CPATU no Estado do Pará. EMBRAPA- CPATU, Pesquisa em Andamento 134:1-3.
• Câmara, P.E.A.S & Vital, D.M. 2004. Briófitas do Município de Poconé, Pantanal de Mato Grosso, MT, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 18(4):881-886.
• Campelo, M.J de A. & Pôrto, K.C. 2007. Brioflora epífita e epífila da RPPN Frei Caneca, Jaqueira, PE, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 21(1):185-192.
• Costa, D.P. 1999. Epiphytic Bryophyte Diversity in Primary and Secondary Lowland Rain forests in Southeastern Brazil. The Bryologist 102(2):320-326.
• Costa, D.P. 2013. Briófitas In Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em: <http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/jabot/floradobrasil/FB128472>. Acesso em: 21 Nov. 2013
• Costa, D.P. 2012. Briófitas In: Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. (http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/2012/FB000006).
• Costa, D.P. & Lima, F.M. 2005. Moss diversity in the tropical rainforests of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira Botânica 28(4):671-685.
• Costa, D.P. & Luizi-Ponzo, A.P. 2010. As briófitas do Brasil. Pp. 61-68. In: Forzza et al (Orgs.). Catálogo de Plantas e Fungos do Brasil. vol.1. Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro.
• Costa, D.P., Imbassahy, C.A.A & Silva, V.P.A.V. da. 2005. Diversidade e Importância das Espécies de Briófitas na Conservação dos Ecossistemas do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rodriguésia 56 (87):13-49.
• Costa, D.P. Imbassahy, C.A.A. & Silva, V.P.A.V. & Monteiro, M.D. 2012a. Banco de Dados - Briófitas do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em:<http://http://www.jbrj.gov.br/pesquisa/div_tax/briofitas/bancodedados.htm> (Acesso em 22/1/2012).
• Costa, D.P., Peralta, D.F., Santos, N.D. 2012b. Hepáticas. In Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. (http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/2012/FB097713).
• Crandall-Stotler, B.; Stotler, R.E. & Long, D.G. 2009. Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta Pp. 1-54. In: Shaw, A.J. & Goffinet, B. Bryophyte Biology 2.ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Dauphin, G. 2003. Ceratolejeunea Flora Neotropica Monograph 90:1-86.
• Engel, J.J. & Smith-Merril, G.L. 2004. Austral Hepaticae 35. A Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Study of Telaranea (Lepidoziaceae), with a monograph of the Genus in Temperate Australasia and Commentary on Extra-Australasian Taxa. Fieldiana Botany 44:1-265.
• Florschütz, P.A. 1964. The Mosses of Suriname. Musci Part I. Pp.1-271. In: Lanjouw, J. (Ed). Flora of Suriname Leiden, Brill.
• Florschütz-De Waard, J. 1986. Musci (Part II). Flora of Suriname Pp. 274-361. Leiden, Ed. Stoffers, A.L.; Lindeman, J.C.
• Florschütz-De Waard, J. 1996. Sematophyllaceae. Musci III. Pp.384-438. In: Görts-Van Rijn, A.R.A. (Ed.). Flora of The Guianas Series C: Bryophytes, Fascicle 1.
• Florschütz-De Waard, J. & Veling, K. 1996. Hypnaceae. Musci III. Pp.439 462. In: Görts-Van Rijn, A. R. A. (Ed.). Flora of the Guianas Series C: Bryophytes, Fascicle 1.
• Frahm, J.P. 2003. Manual of Tropical Bryology. Tropical Bryology 23:195.
• Fullford, M.H. 1968. Manual of leafy hepaticae of Latin America-Part III. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 11:277-392.
• Goffinet, B.; Buck, W.R. & Shaw, A.J. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. Pp. 54-138. In: Shaw, A.J. & Goffinet, B. Bryophyte Biology 2. ed. Cambridge, University Press Cambridge.
• Gradstein, S.R. 1994. Lejeuneaceae; Ptychantheae, Brachiolejeuneae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 62:1-225.
• Gradstein, S.R. 1995. Bryophyte Diversity of the Tropical Rainforest. Archives de Sciences de Genève 48(1):91-96.
• Gradstein, S.R. 2006. The Lowland Cloud Forest of French Guiana - a Liverwort Hotspot. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 27(1):141-152.
• Gradstein, S.R. & Raeymaekers G. 2000. Tropical America (incl. México). Pp. 38-44. In: Hallingbäck, T. & N.Hodgetts. (compilers). Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Bryophytes IUCN/SCC Bryophyte Specialists Group. Cambridge, Island Press,
• Gradstein, S.R. & Costa, D.P. 2003. Liverworts and Hornworts of Brazil. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 88:1-673.
• Gradstein, S.R. & Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. 2009. Guide to the Plants of Central French Guiana. Part 4. Liverworts and Hornworts. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 76(4):1-140.
• Gradstein, S.R.; Hietz, P.; Lücking, R.; Lücking, A.; Sipman, H.J.M.; Vester, H.F.M.; Wolf, J.H.D. & Gardette, E. 1996. How to sample the epiphytic diversity of tropical rain forests. Ecotropica 2:59-72.
• Gradstein, S.R.; Churchill, S.P. & Salazar-Allen, N. 2001. Guide to the Bryophytes of Tropical America. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 86
• He, X.-L. 1999. A Taxonomic Monograph of the Genus Pycnolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae). Acta Botanica Fennica 163:1-77.
• Heinrichs, J; Renker, C. & Gradstein, S.R. 1999. A Taxonomic Revision of Plagiochila subplana Lindenb., a Widespread Liverwort of Tropical América. Haussknechtia Beiheft 9 (Riclef-Grolle- Festschrift):171-181.
• IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - 1991. Divisão do Brasil em Mesorregiões Geográficas 2 Tomo 1-Região Norte.
• IDESP - Instituto do Desenvolvimento Econômico Social do Pará. 1992. Atividades de coleta e tratamento de dados. Estado do Pará. População residente em 1980 e estimativa em 01.07.92. Belém, 4 p.
• Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2002a. Os Gêneros Leptolejeunea e Raphidolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae) na Estação Científica Ferreira Penna, Pará, Brasil. Acta Amazonica 32(2):205-215.
• Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2002b. Os Gêneros Lejeunea e Microlejeunea (Lejeuneaceae) na Estação Científica Ferreira Penna, Estado do Pará, Brasil e Novas Ocorrências. Acta Amazonica 32(4):541-553.
• Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2002c. Os Gêneros Cyrtolejeunea A.Evans e Drepanolejeunea Steph. (Lejeuneaceae) na Estação Científica Ferreira Penna (PA) e Novas Ocorrências. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Série Botânica 18(2):231-245.
• Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2002d. Lejeuneaceae (Hepaticae). Pp. 399-419. In: Lisboa, P.L.B. (Org.). Caxiuanã: Populações Tradicionais, Meio Físico e Diversidade Biológica Belém, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.
• Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2004. Os gêneros Cyclolejeunea, Haplolejeunea, Harpalejeunea, Lepidolejeunea e Rectolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae) na Estação Científica Ferreira Penna, Pará, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 18(3):537-553.
• Ilkiu-Borges, A.L.; Tavares, A.C.C. & Lisboa, R.C. 2004. Briófitas da Ilha de Germoplasma, Reservatório de Tucuruí, Pará, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 18(3):691-694.
• Inoue, H. & Gradstein, S.R. 1980. Notes on the Plagiochilaceae, IX. A Review of the Genus Plagiochila (Dum.) Dum. (Hepaticae) in the Galapagos Islands. Bulletin oh the National Science Museum 6(1):7-22.
• INPE - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. Desflorestamento nos municípios da Amazônia Legal para o ano de 2007 Disponível em:<www.dpi.inpe.br/prodesdigital/prodesmunicipal.php> Acesso em 02 janeiro 2009.
• Lisboa, P.L.B., Maciel, U.N. & Prance, G.T. 1987. Perdendo Rondônia. Ciência Hoje 6(36):48-56.
• Lisboa, R.C.L. 1993. Musgos Acrocárpicos do Estado de Rondônia Belém, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.
• Lisboa, R.C.L. & Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. 1995. Diversidade das Briófitas de Belém (PA) e seu Potencial como Indicadoras de Poluição Urbana. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Série Botânica 11(2):199-225.
• Lisboa, R.C.L. & Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. 1997. Novas ocorrências de Bryophyta (Musgos) para o Estado do Pará, Brasil. Acta Amazonica 27(2):81-102.
• Lisboa, R.C.L. & Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. 2001. Briófitas de São Luís do Tapajós, Município de Itaituba, com Novas Adições para o Estado do Pará. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Série Botânica 17(1):75-91.
• Lisboa, R.C.L. & Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. 2007. Uma Nova Avaliação da Brioflora da Reserva Mocambo, Belém (Pa). Pp.149-174. In: Gomes, J.I.; Martins, M.B.; Martins-Da-Silva, R.C.V.; Almeida, S.S. (Org.). Diversidade e Dinâmica da Área de Pesquisa Ecológica do Guamá-Apeg Belém, Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental.
• Lisboa, R.C.L. & Nazaré, J.M.M. de. 1997. A Flora Briológica. Pp. 223-235. In: Lisboa, P.L.B. (Org.). Caxiuanã Belém, CNPq/MPEG.
• Lisboa, R.C.L. & Nazaré, J.M.M. 2002. Sematophyllaceae (Bryophyta) - Novas Adições. Pp.389-397. In: Lisboa, P.L.B. (Org.).Caxiuanã: Populações Tradicionais, Meio Físico e Diversidade Biológica Belém, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.
• Lisboa, R.C.L & Santos, R.C. 2005. Ocorrência do Gênero Papillaria (Müll. Hal.) Müll. Hal. (Meteoriaceae, Bryophyta) na Amazônia. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, ser. Ciências Naturais 1(1):61-63.
• Lisboa, R.C.L. & Tavares, A.C.C. 2008. Briófitas de Santarém Novo, Pará. Pp.51-61. In: Jardim, M.A.G. & Zoghbi, M.G.B. (Orgs.), A Flora Resex Chocoaré-Mato Grosso (PA): diversidades e usos. Belém: MPEG.
• Lisboa, R.C.L.; Lima, M.J.L. & Maciel, U.N. 1999. Musgos da Ilha de Marajó - II - Município de Anajás, Pará, Brasil. Acta Amazonica 29(2):201-206.
• Lisboa, R.C.L.; Muniz, A.C.M.; Maciel, U.N. 1998. Musgos da Ilha de Marajó - III - Chaves (Pará). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 14(2):117-125.
• Lisboa, R.C.L.; Tavares, A.C.C. & Costa-Neto, S.V. 2006. Musgos (Bryophyta) e Hepáticas (Marchantiophyta) da Zona Costeira do Estado do Amapá, Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 18:163-171.
• Oliveira, S.M. 2010. Diversity of epiphytic bryophytes across the Amazon Igitur, University Utrecht.
• Parolly, G.; Kürschner, H.; Schäfer-Verwimp & Gradstein, S.R. 2004. Cryptogams of the Reserva Biológica San Francisco (Province Zamora-Chinchipe, Southern Ecuador) III. Bryophytes - Additions and new species. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 25(3):271-289.
• Peralta, D.F & Yano, O. 2011. Bryophytes from the Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão Herbarium, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 21:47-80.
• Pôrto, K.C.; Germano, S.R. & Borges, G.M. 2004. Avaliação dos Brejos de Altitude de Pernambuco e Paraíba, quanto à Diversidade de Briófitas, para a Conservação. Pp. 79-97. In. Pôrto, K.C.; Cabral, J.J.P. & Tabarelli, M. (Orgs.). Brejos de altitude em Pernambuco e Paraíba: história natural, ecologia e conservação Brasília, Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
• Reese, W.D. 1961. The genus Calymperes in the Americas. Bryologist 64(2-3):89-140.
• Reese, W.D. 1993. Calymperaceae. Flora Neotropica 58:1-102.
• Reiner-Drehwald, M.E. 1994. Las Lejeuneaceae (Hepaticae) de Misiones, Argentina-II. Cololejeunea Tropical Bryology 9:79-88.
• Reiner-Drehwald, M.E. 1998. Las Lejeuneaceae (Hepaticae), Argentina V. Cheilolejeunea y Lepidolejeunea. Tropical Bryology 14:53-68.
• Reiner-Drehwald, M.E. 2000. Las Lejeuneaceae (Hepaticae) de Misiones, Argentina VI. Lejeunea Y Taxilejeunea. Tropical Bryology 19:1-131.
• Reiner-Drehwald, M.E. 2007. Preliminary key to the genus Lejeunea in Brazil Disponível em: <http://www.drehwald.info/Lejeunea/lejeunea.html> Acesso em junho 2007.
• Reiner-Drehwald, M.E. & Goda, A. 2000. Revision of the genus Crossotelejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 89:1-54.
• Reiner-Drehwald, M. E. & Ilkiu-Borges, A. L. 2007. Lejeunea huctumalcensis, a widely distributed Lejeuneaceae from the Neotropics, and its relation to Ceratolejeunea The Bryologist 110:465-474.
• Rico, R. & Pócs, T. 2004. Briófitos de La tierras altas de la Guayana Venezolana: hepáticas del Roraima-tepui I. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 25(3):249-269.
• Rhoades, F.M. 1995. Nonvascular epiphytes in forest canopies: worldwide distribution, abundance and ecological roles. Pp. 353-408. In: Lowman, M.D. & Nadkarni, N.M. (Ed.). Forest Canopies San Diego, Academic Press.
• Santos, R.C. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2003. Contribuição ao Estudo dos Musgos (Bryophyta) no Nordeste Paraense, Zona Bragantina, Microrregião do Salgado e Município de Viseu, Pará. Acta Amazonica 33(3):415-422.
• Santos, R.C. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2008. Musgos (Bryophyta) da Microrregião do Salgado Paraense e sua Utilização como Possíveis Indicadores de Ambientes Perturbados. Rodriguésia 59(2):361-368.
• SEPOF - Secretaria Executiva de Estado de Planejamento, Orçamento e Finanças. 2008. Estatística Municipal-por mesorregiões Belém, Governo do Estado do Pará. Disponível em: www.sepof.pa.gov.br/mesorregiao.html> (Acesso em: 02 dezembro 2008).
• Siqueira, S.M.C.; Costa, P.S.; Souza, Oliveira E.B. & Oliveira, H.C. 2011. Briófitas de um remanescente de Mata Atlântica no Município de Ubajara, CE, Brasil. Hoehnea 38(4):597-608.
• Souza, A.P.S. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2005. Musgos (Bryophyta) na Ilha Trambioca, Barcarena, PA, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 19(3):487-492.
• Souza, A.P.S. & Lisboa, R.C.L. 2006. Aspectos Florísticos e Taxonômicos dos Musgos do Município de Barcarena, Pará. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Naturais 1(1):81-104.
• Schuster, R.M. 1980. The Hepaticae and Anthocerothe of North America. East of the Hundredth Meridian New York, Columbia University Press.
• Tavares, A.C.C.; Lisboa, R.C.L. & Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. 2006. Novas Ocorrências de Lejeuneaceae (Hepaticae) para o Estado do Pará, Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 18:173-179.
• Tixier, P. 1980. Contribution a L'Etude du Genre Cololejeunea (Lejeuneaceae). IX- Espèces Nouvelles du Sous Genre Pedinolejeunea (Ben.) Mizutani en Région Néotropicale. Bradea 3(6):35-44.
• Valente, E.B. & Pôrto, K.C. 2006. Hepáticas (Marchantiophyta) de um fragmento de Mata Atlântica na Serra da Jibóia, Município de Santa Teresinha, BA, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 20(2):433-441.
• Valente, E.B., Pôrto, K.C. & Bastos, C.J. 2013. Species richness and distribution of bryophytes within different phytophysiognomies in the Chapada Diamantina region of Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 27(2):294-310.
• Vieira, I.C.G. 1996. Forest succession after shifting cultivation in eastern Amazônia Ph.D. Thesis Departament of Biological and Molecular Sciences, University of Stirling.
• Wiesenmüller, J.D. 2004. Sistemas de Produção e Manejos dos Recursos Naturais da Agricultura Familiar no Nordeste Paraense, o Caso Capitão Poço Belém, UFPA.
• Wolf, J.H.D. 2005. The response of epiphytes to anthropogenic disturbance of pine-oak forests in the highlands of Chiapas, México. Forest Ecology and Management 212:376-393.
• Yamada, K. 1993. Notes on the Type Specimens of Radula Taxa From Latin America 6. Journal Hattori Botanical Laboratory 73:125-137.
• Yano, O. 1984a. Briófitas. Pp. 27-30. In: Fidalgo, O. & Bononi, V.L.R. (Eds.). Técnicas de coleta, preservação e herborização de material botânico Série Documentos. São Paulo, Instituto de Botânica.
• Yano, O. 1984b. Checklist of Brazilian liverworts and hornworts. The Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 56:481-548.
• Yano, O. 1985. Octoblepharum (Leucobryaceae) do Alto Rio Negro, Amazonas (Brasil). Acta Amazonica, Supl. 15 (1-2):55-62.
• Yano, O. 1989. An additional checklist of Brazilian bryophytes. The Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 66:371-434.
• Yano, O. 1995. A new additional annotated checklist of Brazilian bryophytes. The Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 78:137-182.
• Yano, O. 2006. Novas adições às briófitas brasileiras. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 18:229-233.
• Yano, O. 2008. Catálogo de Antóceros e Hepáticas Brasileiros: literatura original, basiônimo, localidade-tipo e distribuição geográfica. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 19:1-110.
• Yano, O. 2011a. Catálogo de Musgos Brasileiros: Literatura Original, Basiônimo, Localidade-tipo e Distribuição Geográfica. São Paulo, Instituto de Botânica.
• Yano, O. 2011b. New records of bryophytes for the States of Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 21:19-45.
• Yano, O. & Câmara, P.E.A.S. 2004. Briófitas de Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. Acta Amazonica 34(3):445-457.
• Yano, O &. Peralta, D.F. 2011. Bryophytes from the Serra de São José, Tiradentes, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica 21:141-172.

1

Based on the PhD dissertation of the first author

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  31 Jan 2014
• Date of issue
  Mar 2014

History

• Received
  06 Dec 2012
• Accepted
  17 Sept 2013