SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 issue2Surgical model pig ex vivo for venous dissection teaching in medical schools author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

Print version ISSN 0102-8650On-line version ISSN 1678-2674

Acta Cir. Bras. vol.32 no.2 São Paulo Feb. 2017

https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020170209 

REVIEW

Glial scar-modulation as therapeutic tool in spinal cord injury in animal models¹

Jéssica Rodrigues OrlandinI 

Carlos Eduardo AmbrósioIII 

Valéria Maria LaraII 

IFellow Master degree, Postgraduate Program in Animal Bioscience, Veterinary Medicine Department, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo (FZEA/USP), Pirassununga-SP, Brazil. Intellectual, scientific, conception and design of the study; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; manuscript writing.

IIPostdoctoral Researcher, Postgraduate Program in Animal Bioscience, Veterinary Medicine Department, FZEA/USP, Pirassununga-SP, Brazil. Conception and design of the study, critical revision, final approval.

IIIResearcher, CNPq Grant Level 1A - CA VT, Veterinary Medicine Department, FZEA/USP, Pirassununga-SP, Brazil. Conception and design of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision, final approval.


Abstract

Purpose:

Spinal Cord injury represents, in veterinary medicine, most of the neurological attendances and may result in permanent disability, death or euthanasia. Due to inflammation resulting from trauma, it originates the glial scar, which is a cell interaction complex system. Its function is to preserve the healthy circuits, however, it creates a physical and molecular barrier that prevents cell migration and restricts the neuroregeneration ability.

Methods:

This review aims to present innovations in the scene of treatment of spinal cord injury, approaching cell therapy, administration of enzyme, anti-inflammatory, and other active principles capable of modulating the inflammatory response, resulting in glial scar reduction and subsequent functional improvement of animals.

Results:

Some innovative therapies as cell therapy, administration of enzymes, immunosuppressant or other drugs cause the modulation of inflammatory response proved to be a promising tool for the reduction of gliosis.

Conclusion:

Those tools promise to reduce gliosis and promote locomotor recovery in animals with spinal cord injury.

Key words: Stem Cells. Inflammation. Neuroprotection. Models; Animal

Spinal cord injury in veterinary medicine

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) may have an endogenous or exogenous origin. Regardless of the cause, SCI are related to injury, compression, transaction, laceration, traction of the neural tissue, hemorrhage and hematoma, hypoxia, spinal cord laceration or the associated roots and others injuries resulting in varying degrees of neurological disorders1,2. Furthermore, physical interruption of nerve impulses and loss of blood flow and auto regulation, other biochemical, vascular and inflammatory events are involved in the neuronal destruction and necrosis3,4.

Endogenous capacity of self-repair and regenerate of the spinal cord is limited after injury5,6, due to the minor capacity of the replacement of damaged nerve cells7, as well as the production of growth inhibitory myelin associated axon and the formation of glial scar8.

The consequences of SCI in veterinary medicine, depending on the injured segment can lead to permanent disability or euthanasia.

Glial scar

Glial scar consists predominantly of reactive astrocytes, macrophages, microglia and Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans (CSPGs)9, that leads to a dense deposit of extracellular collagen matrix, acting as protective barrier scar, however, inhibits cell and axonal migration10.

Damage of the blood-brain barrier, leukocytes extravasations and accumulation of inflammatory cells in the center of the lesion are crucial events in the formation of the gliosis. Several molecules derived from blood or produced via inflammatory has been identified as a trigger for their induction, including interleukin-1, Transformation Growth Factor beta (TGFβ) and fibrinogen11-15.

After the injury, fibroblasts migrate into the epicenter of the lesion, forming a fibrotic scar filled with extracellular fibronectin, collagen and laminin16. The proliferation of A-type pericytes contributes to the formation of the fibrosis, even in contused injuries, when meninges are intact and responsible for most of the components of the fibrotic scar. The glial scar appears in its mature form within two weeks after injury17,18.

Actived macrophages and microglia increase significantly the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which contributes to vascular permeability and accumulation of more inflammatory cells in the lesion, which reaches its peak around thirty days after injury19-21. Therefore, these activated cells, although important for the debridement of injured tissue, may also lead to secondary damage by inflammatory process22. Studies have shown that activated macrophages are responsible for the gradual and progressive death of axons after injury, trough the activity of MMPs and direct physical interaction with injured cells19,20.

The glial response is mainly characterized by hypertrophy of astrocytes migrate out of the inflammatory epicenter, where they increase in size and present high gene expression of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), vimetin and nestin23,24. Hyperatrophic astrocytes are restructured into a network of tangled filamentous process, which acts protecting viable neural cells, however, resulting in a major physical barrier for axonal regeneration. Furthermore, studies suggest that glial scar prevents the inflammatory process to spread the healthy tissue25,26.

Inflammatory response modulation as a therapeutic approach

Several authors associated gliosis modulation with the clinical response of spinal cord injury in animais. In one study, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) was administered intraperitoneally, from 3 to 4 weeks after spinal cord injury in rats. There was a decrease in the expression of CSPGs and neurocan, intense expression of GFAP, preservation of axonal arrangement and structure in inflammatory myelin and improved gray matter and gliosis reduction27.

Yazdani et al.28 compared the transplantation of cells from the olfactory epithelium and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, neurally induced in rats with spinal cord injury. They concluded that the induced cells caused significantly motor improvement, reduction of the size of injury and axonal regeneration, making this strategy promising candidate for future therapies.

Another study has shown that Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) has curative capacity by regulating TGFβ, completely blocking the secretion of these factors on reactive astrocytes in vitro. The transplantation of cells capable of secrete HGF reduced neurocan expression and glycosaminoglycan deposition in the lesion and promoted axonal growth around the gliosis and functional improvement of the hindlimbs in rats29.

Ahmed et al.30 used decorin - a proteoglycan associated with collagen fibers - to block the glial scar and cystic cavitation and induce fibrotic dissolution of gliosis in rats with chronic spinal cord injury. These mechanisms have been attributed to the induction capacity of MMPs and plasminogen activity, modulation of inflammation, removal of growth inhibitors and axonal regeneration promotion in the lesion.

Another study demonstrated the efficacy of transplantation dedifferentiated adipocytes in promoting locomotor improvement, remyelination, glial scar reduction and increased expression of neurotrophic factors in mice with spinal cord injury31.

Studies using curcimun - an active component of turmeric, which acts as an anti-inflammatory - demonstrated the ability of the substance to reduces local inflammation, suppressing the formation of glial scar by inhiniting the process of reactive astrocytes cytokines and pro-inflammatory such as TNF- TNF-α, IL-1β e NK- κb, in addition to promote protection of neurons and axons after spinal cord injury in rodents32,33.

Rapamycin - an immunosuppressant used for the prophylaxis of organ transplant rejection - reduces infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages in the lesion, microglial activation, secretion of TNFβ, the number of cells expressing GFAP, inhibited the proliferation of astrocytes and promoted neuronal survival and axiogenesis around the injury, being a good tool in the treatment of spinal cord injury in mice34.

Naïve Schwann cells and Schawann cells transduced to express GDNF which were seeded into guidance channels and implanted at the spinal cord injury by Do-Thi et al.35, inhibit the formation of glial scar by promoting functional improvement in rats, when expressed Lv-shGFAP (lentiviral-mediated RNA-interference against GFAP). It was also observed growing axons and increased serotonergic innervation, suggesting that this type of therapy aids in the treatment of spinal cord injury.

Several studies using the enzyme chondroitinase ABC36-39 in ratis demonstrated their potential in digesting CSPGs - inhibitory molecules predominant in glial scar - modifying the intra and extracellular architecture, reducing the formation of gliosis, regenerating axons injured by improving neural connections and promoting neuroprotection.

By intrathecal bone marrow cells transplantation, Zhu et al.40 demonstrated that gliosos is more associated with macrophages than microglia in mice. Depletion of these macrophages resulted in a reduction of fibroblasts and the formation of basal lamina, leading to a scar less fibrotic and more conducive to axonal growth.

The transplantation of neural progenitor cells in the spinal Cord injury showed the ability of these cells to inhibit astrocyte activation, reduce gliosis and promote improved locomotor in treated rats41-43.

In the following Table 1, a summary of the therapies addressed in this review can be observed:

Table 1 Therapies to promote glial scar-modulation. 

Author Therapy Animal Route of administration
Zhu et al.40 Bone Marrow cells Mice Intrathecal
Yamada et al.31 Mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells Mice Intramedullary
Yazdani et al.28 Olfactory epithelium and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (neurally induced) Rats
Jeong et al.29 HGF overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells derived from human bone marrow (HGF-MSCs) Rats
Ahmed et al.30 Decorin Rats
Do-Thi et al.35 Schwann cells Rats
Yick36, Xia et al.37, Huang et al. 38, Ni et al.39 Chondroitinase ABC Rats
Bonner et al.41, Jin et al.42, Mitsui et al.43 Neural progenitor cells Rats
Huang et al.27 Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Rats Intraperitoneally
Yuan et al.33 Curcimun Rats
Wang et al.32 Curcimun Mice
Goldshmit et al.34 Rapamycin Mice

Conclusion

Spinal Cord injuries represent the majority of neurological manifestations in veterinary medicine. Gliosis is characterizes by replacement of functional tissue by fibrous after injury, in order to promote protection of healthy cells. This process, however, implies a physical and molecular barrier that inhibits cell and axon migration and thus prevents the functional improvement.

As a way of reversing or deflecting this event, studies have shown that modulation of the inflammatory response at the wound site results in a reduction in lesions size, neuronal survival, protection growth, remyelination and increased innervations, leading to a reduction, inhibition or reversal of glial scar and promotes improved locomotor to treated animals.

We conclude that either by cell therapy, administration of enzymes, immunosuppressant or other drugs, the modulation of inflammatory response proved to be a promising tool for the reduction of gliosis, aiding locomotor recovery in animals with spinal cord injury.

References

1. McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet. 2002;359:417-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07603-1. [ Links ]

2. Henke D, Vandevelde M, Dohher M, Stöckli M, Forterre F. Correlations between severity of clinical signs and histopathological changes in 6 dogs with spinal cord injury associated with acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc disease. Vet Jl. 2013;198:70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.04.003. [ Links ]

3. Tymianski M, Tator CH. Normal and abnormal calcium homeostasis in neurons: a basis for the pathophysiology of traumatic and ischemic central nervous system injury. Neurosurgery. 1996;38(6):1176-95. PMID: 8727150. [ Links ]

4. Arias MVB, Nishioka CM, Garcia CO, Reia AZ, Baraúna Júnior D, Marcasso RA. Avaliação dos resultados clínicos após cirurgia descompressiva em cães com doença de disco intervertebral. Arq Bras Med Veterinária e Zootec. Esc Vet UFMG. 2007;59(6):1445-50. doi: 10.1590/S0102-09352007000600015. [ Links ]

5. Frisén J, Johansson CB, Török C, Risling M, Lendahl U. Rapid, widespread, and longlasting induction of nestin contributes to the generation of glial scar tissue after CNS injury. J Cell Biol. 1995;131(2):454-64. PMID: 7593171. [ Links ]

6. Zai LJ, Wrathall JR. Cell proliferation and replacement following contusive spinal cord injury. Glia. 2005;50(3):247-57. PMID: 15739189. [ Links ]

7. Johansson CB, Momma S, Clarke DL, Risling M, Lendahl U, Frisén J. Identification of a neural stem cell in the adult mammalian central nervous system. Cell. 1999;96:25-34. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80956-3. [ Links ]

8. Olson L. Medicine: clearing a path for nerve growth. Nature. 2002;416(6881):589-90. PMID: 11948332. [ Links ]

9. Rolls A, Shechter R, London A, Segev Y, Jacob-Hirsch J, Amariglio N, Rechavi G, Schwartz M. Two faces of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan in spinal cord repair: a role in microglia/macrophage activation. PLoS Med. 2008;5(8):1262-77. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050171. [ Links ]

10. Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(2):146-56. PMID: 14735117. [ Links ]

11. Giulian D, Woodward J, Young DG, Krebs JF, Lachman LB. Interleukin-1 injected into mammalian brain stimulates astrogliosis and neovascularization. J Neurosci. 1988;8(7):2485-90. PMID: 2470873. [ Links ]

12. Asher RA, Morgenstern DA, Fidler PS, Adcock KH, Oohira A, Braistead JE, Levine JM, Margolis RU, Rogers JH, Fawcett JW. Neurocan is upregulated in injured brain and in cytokine-treated astrocytes. J Neurosci . 2000;20(7):2427-38. PMID: 10729323. [ Links ]

13. Moon LDF, Fawcett JW. Reduction in CNS scar formation without concomitant increase in axon regeneration following treatment of adult rat brain with a combination of antibodies to TGFbeta1 and beta2. Eur J Neurosci . 2001;14(10):1667-77. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01795.x. [ Links ]

14. Schachtrup C, Ryu JK, Helmrick MJ, Vagena E, Galanakis DK, Degen JL, Margolis RU, Akassoglou K. Fibrinogen triggers astrocyte scar formation by promoting the availability of active TGF-beta after vascular damage. J Neurosci . 2010;30(17):5843-54. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0137-10.2010. [ Links ]

15. Ertürk A, Mauch CP, Hellal F, Förstner F, Keck T, Becker K,Jährling N, Richter M, Hübener M, Kramer E, Kirchhoff F, Dodt HU, Bradke F. Three-dimensional imaging of the unsectioned adult spinal cord to assess axon regeneration and glial responses after injury. Nat Med. 2012;18:166-71. PMID: 22198277. [ Links ]

16. Shearer MC, Fawcett JW. The astrocyte/meningeal cell interface--a barrier to successful nerve regeneration? Cell Tissue Res. 2001;305(2):267-73. PMID: 11545264. [ Links ]

17. Göritz C, Dias DO, Tomilin N, Barbacid M, Shupliakov O, Frisén J. A pericyte origin of spinal cord scar tissue. Science. 2011;333(6039):238-42. PMID: 21737741. [ Links ]

18. Soderblom C, Luo X, Blumenthal E, Bray E, Lyapichev K, Ramos J, Krishnan V, Lai-Hsu C, Park KK, Tsoulfas P, Lee JK. Perivascular fibroblasts form the fibrotic scar after contusive spinal cord injury. J Neurosci . 2013;33(34):13882-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2524-13.2013. [ Links ]

19. Horn KP, Busch SA, Hawthorne AL, Van Rooijen N, Silver J. Another barrier to regeneration in the CNS: activated macrophages induce extensive retraction of dystrophic axons through direct physical interactions. J Neurosci . 2008;28(38):9330-41. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2488-08.2008. [ Links ]

20. Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG. Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci . 2009;29(43):13435-44. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3257-09.2009. [ Links ]

21. Noble LJ, Donovan F, Igarashi T, Goussev S, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases limit functional recovery after spinal cord injury by modulation of early vascular events. J Neurosci . 2002;22(17):7526-35. PMID: 12196576. [ Links ]

22. Fitch MT, Doller C, Combs CK, Landreth GE, Silver J. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of glial scarring and progressive cavitation: in vivo and in vitro analysis of inflammation-induced secondary injury after CNS trauma. J Neurosci. 1999;19: 8182-98. PMID: 10493720. [ Links ]

23. Faulkner JR, Herrmann JE, Woo MJ, Tansey KE, Doan NB, Sofroniew MV. Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci . 2004;24(9):2143-55. PMID: 14999065. [ Links ]

24. Barrett CP, Guth L, Donati EJ, Krikorian JG. Astroglial reaction in the gray matter lumbar segments after midthoracic transection of the adult rat spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 1981;73(2):365-77. PMID: 6167460. [ Links ]

25. Okada S, Nakamura M, Katoh H, Miyao T, Shimazaki T, Ishii K, Yamane J, Yoshimura A, Iwamoto Y, Toyama Y, Okano H. Conditional ablation of Stat3 or Socs3 discloses a dual role for reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury. Nat Med . 2006;12(7):829-34. PMID: 16783372. [ Links ]

26. Wanner IB, Anderson MA, Song B, Levine J, Fernandez A, Gray-Thompson Z, Ao Y, Sofroniew MV. Glia l scar borders are formed by newly proliferated, elongated astrocytes that interact to corral inflammatory and fibrotic cells via STAT3-dependent mechanisms after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci . 2013;33(31):12870-86. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2121-13.2013. [ Links ]

27. Huang X, Kim J-M, Kong TH, Park SR, Ha Y, Kim MH, Park H, Yoon SH, Park HC, Park JO, Min BH, Choi BH. GM-CSF inhibits glial scar formation and shows long-term protective effect after spinal cord injury. J Neurol Sci. 2009;277:87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.10.022. [ Links ]

28. Yazdani SO, Pedram M, Hafizi M, Kabiri M, Soleimani M, Dehghan M-M, Jahanzad I, Gheisari Y, Hashemi SM. A comparison between neurally induced bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells and olfactory ensheathing glial cells to repair spinal cord injuries in rat. Tissue Cell. 2012;44(4):205-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2012.03.003. [ Links ]

29. Jeong SR, Kwon MJ, Lee HG, Joe EH, Lee JH, Kim SS, Shu-Kim H, Kim BG. Hepatocyte growth factor reduces astrocytic scar formation and promotes axonal growth beyond glial scars after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol . 2012;233:312-22. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.10.021. [ Links ]

30. Ahmed Z, Bansal D, Tizzard K, Surey S, Esmaeili M, Gonzalez AM, Berry M, Logan A. Decorin blocks scarring and cystic cavitation in acute and induces scar dissolution in chronic spinal cord wounds. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;64:163-76. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.12.008. [ Links ]

31. Yamada H, Ito D, Oki Y, Kitagawa M, Matsumoto T, Watari T, Kano K. Transplantation of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells promotes locomotor functional recovery by remyelination and glial scar reduction after spinal cord injury in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;454 (2):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.082. [ Links ]

32. Wang Y-F, Zu J-N, Li J, Chen C, Xi C-Y, Yan J-L. Curcumin promotes the spinal cord repair via inhibition of glial scar formation and inflammation. Neurosci Lett. 2014;560:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.11.050. [ Links ]

33. Yuan J, Zou M, Xiang X, Zhu H, Chu W, Liu W, Chen F, Lin J. Curcumin improves neural function after spinal cord injury by the joint inhibition of the intracellular and extracellular components of glial scar. J Surg Res. 2015;195:235-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.055. [ Links ]

34. Goldshmit Y, Kanner S, Zacs M, Frisca F, Pinto AR, Currie PD, Kramarski R P. Rapamycin increases neuronal survival, reduces inflammation and astrocyte proliferation after spinal cord injury. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2015;68:82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.04.006. [ Links ]

35. Do-Thi A, Perrin FE, Desclaux M, Saillour P, Amar L, Privat A, Mallet J. Combination of grafted Schwann cells and lentiviral-mediated prevention of glial scar formation improve recovery of spinal cord injured rats. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016;76:48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.12.014. [ Links ]

36. Yick L. Axonal regeneration of Clarke’s neurons beyond the spinal cord injury scar after treatment with chondroitinase ABC. Exp Neurol . 2003;182:160-8. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4886(02)00052-3. [ Links ]

37. Xia Y, Zhao T, Li J, Li L, Hu R, Hu S, Feng H, Lin J. Antisense vimentin cDNA combined with chondroitinase ABC reduces glial scar and cystic cavity formation following spinal cord injury in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun . 2008;377(2):562-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.024. [ Links ]

38. Huang W-C, Kuo W-C, Hsu S-H, Cheng C-H, Liu J-C, Cheng H. Gait analysis of spinal cord injured rats after delivery of chondroitinase ABC and adult olfactory mucosa progenitor cell transplantation. Neurosci Lett . 2010;472(2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.012. [ Links ]

39. Ni S, Xia T, Li X, Zhu X, Qi H, Huang S, Wang J. Sustained delivery of chondroitinase ABC by poly(propylene carbonate)-chitosan micron fibers promotes axon regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord hemisection. Brain Res. 2015;1624:469-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.018 [ Links ]

40. Zhu Y, Soderblom C, Krishnan V, Ashbaugh J, Bethea JR, Lee JK. Hematogenous macrophage depletion reduces the fibrotic scar and increases axonal growth after spinal cord injury. Neurobiol Dis . 2015;74:114-25. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.024. [ Links ]

41. Bonner JF, Blesch A, Neuhuber B, Fischer I. Promoting directional axon growth from neural progenitors grafted into the injured spinal cord. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88(6):1182-92. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22288. [ Links ]

42. Jin Y, Bouyer J, Shumsky JS, Haas C, Fischer I. Transplantation of neural progenitor cells in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurosci Oxford. 2016;320:69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.01.066. [ Links ]

43. Mitsui T, Kakizaki H, Tanaka H, Shibata T, Matsuoka I, Koyanagi T. Immortalized neural stem cells transplanted into the injured spinal cord promote recovery of voiding function in the rat. J Urol. 2003;170:1421-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000075501.05758.33. [ Links ]

Financial source: none

¹Research performed at Laboratory of Stem Cell and Gene Therapy, Veterinary Medicine Department, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo (FZEA/USP), Pirassununga-SP, Brazil

Received: October 14, 2016; Revised: December 19, 2016; Accepted: January 20, 2017

Correspondence: Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos (FZEA-USP) Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Rua Duque de Caxias Norte, 225 - Campus Fernando Costa 13635-900 Pirassununga - SP Brasil ceambrosio@usp.br

Conflict of interest: none

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License