SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38PSYCHO-EMOTIONAL CARE IN A NEONATAL UNIT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMICCOMPLEXITY OF PEDIATRIC CHRONIC DISEASE: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY WITH 16,237 PATIENTS FOLLOWED BY MULTIPLE MEDICAL SPECIALTIES author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Paulista de Pediatria

Print version ISSN 0103-0582On-line version ISSN 1984-0462

Rev. paul. pediatr. vol.38  São Paulo  2020  Epub Nov 25, 2019

https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018096 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

ACCIDENTAL POISONING IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS ADMITTED TO A REFERRAL TOXICOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF A BRAZILIAN EMERGENCY HOSPITAL

Luciana Vilaçaa 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-0177

Fernando Madalena Volpea  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3252-6715

Roberto Marini Ladeiraa 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1354-4897

aFundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.


ABSTRACT

Objective:

To describe the profile of children and adolescents admitted for exogenous unintentional poisoning in the emergency room and analyze factors associated with subsequent in-hospital admissions.

Methods:

This is a cross-sectional study based on hospital records of all subjects up to 19 years-old admitted in 2013 at a specialized toxicology service on a major public emergency hospital due to unintentional intoxication (as reported). Accidents with poisonous animals and insects were excluded. Percentages and frequencies were calculated for the qualitative variables, and measures of central tendency and dispersion for the continuous quantitative variables. Multivariate analysis was performed using binary logistic regression to identify variables associated with subsequent in-hospital admissions.

Results:

In 2013, 353 cases were reported. Poisonings were more frequent in children 0-4 years-old (72.5%) and in boys (55%). The vast majority was of dwellers of the Metropolitan Region of Belo Horizonte (83%), and 90% of the accidental poisonings occurred at home. 82.7% of the poisonings occurred by oral ingestion, especially of medicinal (36.5%) and cleaning products (29.4% of all poisonings). Only 12.2% of the cases resulted in hospitalization, and only one resulted in death. Residing outside Belo Horizonte (OR=5.20 [95%CI 2.37-11.44]) and poisoning by two or more products (OR=4.29 [95%CI 1.33-13.82]) were considered risk factors for hospitalization.

Conclusions:

Accidental poisonings occurred most frequently by ingestion of household medications and cleaning products, especially among children under 4 years-old. Preventive strategies should be primarily directed for this prevalent profile.

Keywords: Poisoning; Children; Adolescents; Accident; Risk factors

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Descrever o perfil dos atendimentos de crianças e adolescentes vítimas de intoxicações exógenas acidentais e os fatores associados às internações hospitalares.

Métodos:

Foi realizado um estudo transversal com base na revisão dos registros de todas as intoxicações acidentais de indivíduos com até 19 anos de idade, atendidos no setor de toxicologia de um hospital público de referência em 2013, excluídos os acidentes com animais peçonhentos e insetos. A intencionalidade da intoxicação foi baseada nos relatos. Foram calculadas percentagens e frequências para as variáveis qualitativas, e medidas de tendência central e de dispersão das variáveis quantitativas contínuas. Foi realizada análise múltipla, utilizando regressão logística binária para identificar as variáveis associadas à internação hospitalar das vítimas atendidas.

Resultados:

Em 2013, foram identificados 353 atendimentos em crianças e adolescentes. A faixa etária mais prevalente foi a de zero a quatro anos (72,5%), e predominaram indivíduos do sexo masculino (55%). A maioria dos atendimentos foi de pacientes residentes na região metropolitana (83%). Noventa por cento das intoxicações ocorreram nos domicílios; 82,7% se deram pela via oral, especialmente por medicamentos (36,5%) e produtos de limpeza (29,4% de todas as intoxicações). Resultaram em internações 12,2% dos casos, ocorrendo um único óbito. As variáveis associadas à internação foram: residir fora do município sede (razão de chances [OR]=5,20; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%] 2,37-11,44) e o envolvimento de mais do que uma substância na intoxicação (OR=4,29; IC95% 1,33-13,82).

Conclusões:

O ambiente doméstico é o principal local em que ocorrem as intoxicações em crianças e adolescentes, especialmente por ingestão de medicamentos e produtos de limpeza e abaixo de quatro anos de idade. Esses achados justificam a priorização de ações preventivas direcionadas para esse perfil de acidentes.

Palavras-chave: Intoxicação; Criança; Adolescente; Acidente; Fatores de risco

INTRODUCTION

Accidental poisoning is a global health issue among children and adolescents, with approximately 45 thousand deaths per year and an incidence of 1.8 per 100 thousand inhabitants.1 Among 15- to 19-year-olds, it represented the 13th cause of death worldwide in 2014.1 Moreover, poisoning leads to a substantial number of hospitalizations2.

In 2013, half of the 28,419 poisonings notified to the National Poison Data System of Fiocruz (Sistema Nacional de Informações Tóxico-Farmacológicas da Fiocruz - Sinitox3) occurred in individuals under 20 years of age, with 29% of them being 1- to 4-year-olds - the age group with the highest incidence. Death by accidental poisoning in children and adolescents is less common than by intentional poisoning. In 2012, out of the 392 deaths registered, 40 were accidental (non-intentional), and only 12 happened in the age group 0-19 years. In a non-specialized emergency care unit in the inland of Minas Gerais, poisoning among individuals under 20 years of age represented 27.7% of cases.4

Children, particularly preschoolers, stay a significant part of their time at home, where risk exposure is associated with the access to poisonous substances and medicines.5 Caregivers’ lack of knowledge about the toxicity of agents, the inattention to risks, and the lack of supervision contribute to the occurrence of accidental poisoning in childhood.6,7,8 In addition, the improper storage of cleaning products and medicines increases the risk exposure for children at home.6,7,8

Relationships between determinants and outcomes in accidental poisoning during childhood and adolescence change according to the study location. For instance, the type of toxic agent and the ease of access to health services are closely related to the place of residence.1 Therefore, assessing the epidemiology of accidental poisoning in different scenarios and regions is necessary to increase the specificity of preventive strategies.

Recent Brazilian studies that specifically describe the epidemiology of accidental acute poisoning in children and adolescents are scarce. Two studies - in Rio de Janeiro9 and Rio Grande do Sul5 - reported the poisoning profile in children under 6 years of age, both with data collected more than 5 years ago. Two other studies conducted in Brazil addressed accidental poisoning; the first, held in Maringá, Paraná,10,11 described the profile of individuals up to 14 years; and the other, in Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, included children and young adults.12 All national studies report a preponderance of accidents at home, on males, and individuals under four years of age, involving mainly medicines and cleaning products.

This study aimed to investigate the profile of children and adolescent victims of accidental exogenous poisoning treated at a referral toxicology department in Minas Gerais, as well as the factors associated with hospitalization.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional study that included all individuals aged zero to 19 years treated at the Toxicology Department of Hospital João XXIII (Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais), a public state hospital, and diagnosed with accidental exogenous poisoning from January to December 2013. This unit is a public state reference in poisoning. We excluded from the study individuals with intentional exogenous poisoning and accidents caused by venomous and non-venomous animals. Patient or family reports recorded by a health professional determined the intentionality of poisoning. The data source was the patient treatment form of the Toxicology Department. Each treatment performed by the department has one of these forms, usually filled by the medical staff throughout the patient’s hospital stay. In specific cases in which the information on these forms was ambiguous or insufficient, especially regarding the length of stay, we accessed the patient’s electronic medical records to confirm the data.

We adopted the following variables: age (in years); gender; date of the accident; date of the treatment; area of residence (urban or rural); city of residence; route of exposure (ingestion, dermal absorption, inhalation, other); active ingredients of the substance; commercial names of the products; hospitalization (defined as length of stay greater than or equal to 24 hours - yes/no); date of discharge; length of stay; case progression (discharge, death, other).

In the descriptive analyses of treatments, we calculated percentages and frequencies for qualitative variables and measures of central tendency and dispersion for continuous quantitative variables. We compared means and percentages using Student’s t-test and Pearson’s chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test), with a 5% significance level. We conducted a multivariate analysis to identify the variables associated with hospitalization of the victims treated using binary logistic regression and included in the model variables that reached a p-value<0.20 in the univariate analysis with the backward strategy. For these analyses, the dependent variable was hospitalization (dichotomous) and the explanatory variables tested were gender (male or female), age group (up to three years; older than three years), place of residence (Belo Horizonte or other), local of exposure (home or other), number of substances (one, two, or more), substance type (medicines or other), and route of exposure (ingestion or other).

Data were collected without storing information that could allow the individual identification of any participant. The Research Ethics Committees of Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais (FHEMIG), Report No. 491,927, and Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Report No. 53476915.5.0000.5149, approved this project.

RESULTS

In 2013, the Toxicology Department treated 5,013 patients, of which 1,174 belonged to the age group up to 19 years. We found 353 cases of accidental exogenous poisoning in children and adolescents, excluding accidents with venomous animals and insects (n=620; 52.7%), events identified as suicide attempts (n=33; 2.8%), and other diagnoses (n=168; 14.3%).

Table 1 presents the characteristics of these treatments. Most patients lived in Belo Horizonte (70%), while the remaining individuals of the sample resided in other cities from the metropolitan area and other regions of the state. Regarding the area of residence of the victims, a high proportion of them lived in urban areas - 94.9% of cases. Most poisoning cases occurred at the victim’s home (90.1%).

Table 1 Characteristics of patients treated for accidental in the Toxicology Department of the Hospital João XXIII, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2013 (n=353). 

Characteristics n %
Gender
Male 194 (55.0)
Age (years)
< 1 16 (4.5)
1 92 (26.1)
2 67 (19.0)
3 47 (13.3)
4 34 (9.6)
5 to 12 51 (14.4)
13 to 19 46 (13.0)
Route of exposure
Ingestion 292 (82.7)
Inhalation 19 (5.4)
Dermal absorption 18 (5.1)
Other 1 (0.3)
Not informed 23 (6.5)
Products
Medicine 128 (36.3)
Chemical and cleaning product 105 (29.7)
Pesticide 39 (11.1)
Toxic plant 14 (4.0)
Cosmetic product 7 (2.0)
Other 10 (2.8)
Not informed 50 (14.2)
Number of products
1 283 (80.5)
2 17 (5.5)
3 7 (2.8)
Not informed 46 (12.2)
Hospitalization
Yes 43 (12.2)
Progression
Discharge 348 (98.6)
Left hospital against medical advice 3 (0.8)
Death 1 (0.3)

The incidence of males was slightly higher (54.9%). The age with the highest prevalence among victims of accidental exogenous poisoning was one year-old, with 26.1% of cases; while <1-year-old patients had the lowest representativeness, with 4.5% of cases. Children aged 0-4 years accounted for 72.6% of cases.

Analyzing the age distribution according to gender, we found a predominance of males aged up to 2 years and balance between genders in the 3-12-year-old group. However, among adolescents, the predominance of females in the 13-19-year-old group was clear (60.9%).

With respect to routes of exposure, ingestion (82.7%) was the most frequent and dermal absorption (5.1%), the least. Most (80.5%) poisonings had only one product identified as the cause. Poisoning by more than two products simultaneously was uncommon (2.8%).

Among the substances more often involved in exogenous poisoning in children and adolescents, medicines were the most relevant, followed by chemicals/cleaning products and pesticides (Table 2). Pesticides also covered rodenticides and acaricides; and “other” included: food, alcoholic beverages, jellyfish, lime, cement, nicotine, and tetrahydrocannabinol.

Table 2 Distribution of accidental exogenous poisoning in the population aged zero to 19 years, according to product category and age of the victim treated at the Hospital João XXIII in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2013 (n=353). 

Product Age group
< 1 year 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 to 12 years 13 to 19 years Total
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Medicines 5 (31.2) 19 (20.7) 23 (34.3) 25 (53.2) 20 (58.8) 19 (37.3) 17 (37.0) 128 (36.3)
Chemicals and cleaning products 6 (37.5) 36 (39.0) 23 (34.3) 8 (17.0) 8 (23.5) 11 (21.5) 13 (28.2) 105 (29.7)
Pesticides - 19 (20.7) 10 (14.9) 7 (14.9) 1 (2.9) 1 (2.0) 1 (2.2) 39 (11.1)
Toxic plants - 1 (1.1) 3 (4.5) 4 (8.5) 1 (2.9) 5 (9.8) - 14 (4.0)
Cosmetic products 2 (12.5) 3 (3.3) - 1 (2.1) - - 1 (2.2) 7 (2.0)
Other 1 (6.3) 4 (4.4) 1 (1.5) - - - 4 (8.7) 10 (2.8)
Not informed 2 (12.5) 10 (10.9) 7 (10.4) 2 (4.3) 4 (11.8) 15 (29.4) 10 (21.7) 50 (14.2)
Total 16 (100) 92 (100) 67 (100) 47 (100) 34 (100) 51 (100) 46 (100) 353 (100)

Concerning the classification of medicines, the most frequent agents were anxiolytics (mainly benzodiazepines), followed by analgesics (8.5%) - among which paracetamol stands out (5.1%) - and antiepileptic drugs. The category “other” grouped the following medicines: antiasthmatics, hypoglycemic agents, contraceptives, antiemetics, antispastic drugs, antiparasitic agents, urinary tract antiseptics, antiulcer agents, bronchodilators, cardiotonic agents, nasal decongestants, inorganic mercury, ointments, erectile dysfunction drugs, hormonal supplements, finasteride, and vaccines.

The category of chemicals/cleaning products showed a greater percentage of accidental poisoning by sodium hypochlorite (chlorine and bleach) and sodium hydroxide (caustic soda). The hydrocarbon group included turpentine and kerosene, which have this component in their compositions.

Table 3 shows the distribution of the main products involved in accidental poisoning, according to the victims’ age group. Medicines presented the highest incidence in all ages, except in children aged one year; among them, chemicals were more prevalent. In this age group, pesticides and cleaning products were also significant.

Table 3 Categories and classes of products that caused accidental exogenous poisoning in the population aged zero to 19 years, treated at the Hospital João XXIII in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2013 (n=353). 

n % per category % of the total
Medicines 128 100 36.3
Anxiolytics 32 24.7 9.1
Analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs 18 14.0 5.1
Antiepileptic drugs 10 7.8 2.8
Antipsychotics 8 6.2 2.3
Antimicrobial agents 8 6.2 2.3
Antidepressants 7 5.5 2.0
Antihistamines 5 3.9 1.4
Antihypertensive drugs 5 3.9 1.4
Vitamin supplement 5 3.9 1.4
Other 31 24 8.8
Chemicals and cleaning products 105 100 29.7
Sodium hydroxide 21 20.2 5.9
Sodium hypochlorite 21 20.2 5.9
Multiple chemicals 16 15.4 4.5
Hydrocarbon 7 6.6 2.0
Carbon monoxide 7 6.6 2.0
Ammonium hydroxide 6 5.8 1.7
Hydrochloric acid 4 3.9 1.1
Formaldehyde 4 3.9 1.1
Caustic 4 3.9 1.1
Other 15 14.3 4.0
Pesticides 39 100 11.0
Carbamate 9 23.1 2.5
Coumarin 8 20.5 2.3
Pyrethroid 8 20.5 2.3
Organophosphorus compound 4 10.3 1.1
Rodenticide 2 5.1 0.6
Tick spray 2 5.1 0.6
Other 6 15.4 1.7
Other categories 80 - 22.7

Forty-three patients (12%) needed to be hospitalized (length of stay higher than 24 hours). The length of stay ranged from 1 to 5 days, with an average of 1.6 and a median of 1.0 day.

The univariate analysis associated hospitalization with living in other cities, two or more products involved, and ingestion (Table 4). In the final multiple model, victims living in other cities (odds ratio - OR=5.20; 95% confidence interval - 95%CI 2.37-11.44) and those poisoned by two or more substances (OR=4.29; 95%CI 1.33-13.82) had a greater chance of hospitalization; it was not possible to include the variable route of exposure in the model, as all hospitalizations occurred in individuals exposed by ingestion.

Table 4 Univariate analysis of factors associated with hospitalization in cases of accidental poisoning treated at the Hospital João XXIII, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2013 (n=353). 

Characteristic Hospitalization n (%) Crude OR (95%CI) Adjusted OR (95%CI) p-value
No Yes
Gender
Female 140 (45.2) 19 (44.2) 1.04 (0.54-1.97) 0.904
Male 170 (54.8) 24 (55.8)
Age group
3 years or younger 191 (61.6) 31 (72.1) 0.62 (0.30-1.25) 0.183
> 3 years 119 (38.4) 12 (27.9)
Place of residence*
Belo Horizonte 224 (81.2) 22 (55.0) 3.52 (1.76-7.04) 5.20 (2.37-11.44) < 0.001
Other 52 (18.8) 18 (45.0)
Local of exposure
Home 279 (93.6) 38 (97.4) 0.38 (0.05-2.96) 0.343
Other 19 (6.4) 1 (2.6)
Number of substances
1 254 (93.7) 29 (80.6) 3.60 (1.38-9.42) 4.29 (1.33-13.82) 0.006
2 or more 17 (6.3) 7 (19.4)
Substance type
Medicine 109 (40.7) 20 (57.1) 1.94 (0.95-3.96) 0.064
Other 159 (59.3) 15 (42.9)
Route of exposure
Other 38 (13.1) 0 (0.0) - 0.016
Ingestion 253 (86.9) 39 (100.0)

*City of residence; OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.

Out of the victims treated for accidental exogenous poisoning, only one died - a five-year-old who ingested propranolol, an antihypertensive drug. Three (0.9%) patients left the hospital facilities against medical advice without completing the treatment, and a single victim was transferred to another hospital.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study show a predominance of treatments for accidental poisoning in male children, aged 0-4 years, particularly those aged 1-2 years. This finding corroborates the results from several studies conducted in different countries and scenarios.8,9,10,11,12,13,14

Soori7 And Manouchehrifar et al.13 found a higher incidence of cases among boys and in the age group 0-4 years, in studies carried out in Iran. A study conducted in India between 2004 and 2006 revealed that the mean age with the highest prevalence of accidental exogenous poisoning was 2-3 years.14 In Brazil, a study conducted at the Hospital Universitário de Maringá, Paraná,10 showed a higher number of poisonings among male children (52.2%) and in the age group 0-4 years (81.0%). Also in Brazil, in Cuiabá, a study indicated that most victims were male (60%) and aged 0-4 years (71%).12 These data point to the need for strict surveillance and protective measures targeted at younger children, as they are at higher risk of accidents, given their tendency to explore the environment where they live - an integral part of their cognitive and motor development. In the first years of life, children explore objects orally, facilitating the ingestion of toxic products.5,15 The combination of the need for discovery, oral exploration, and insufficient judgment of risks is characteristic of young children and can explain the predominance of accidental poisoning in this age group.

We underline the inversion of predominant gender with increasing age, that is, females were more prevalent in the age group over 12 years in this study. As intentional poisoning among adolescents is more frequent in females,16 these findings raise the suspicion that some cases have been wrongly classified as accidental in this age group. The fact that benzodiazepines were disproportionately involved in this age group corroborates this suspicion (5% of victims aged up to 12 years and 13% of those over this age).

Most (90%) accidents happened at home, corroborating findings from other national and international studies. Soori7 identified that 89% of poisonings in children occurred inside the house, especially in younger ones. In 75% of cases, toxic products were accessible to the victims. A study performed in Maringá10 also identified the victim’s home as the main place of poisoning (87% of cases), even when the child was under the protection and in the presence of an adult. The predominant triggering factors were easy access to medicines and exposure by ingestion.10 In the present study, information about the location within the residence where the accident happened was not available. However, in other reports,5,17 the living room, bedroom, and kitchen were the places with the most cases of poisoning in children.

In our study, the most common route of exposure was ingestion, which reached 82.7% of cases, a result largely corroborated by the literature.10,14,18,19,20

Our data showed that medicines were responsible for 36.5% of accidents, while other non-medicinal products (chemicals, pesticides, cleaning products, toxic plants, and cosmetics) accounted for 46.5% of cases. The predominance of medicines7,10,12,13,19,20,21 and cleaning products12,18,22 is a virtual constant in studies about poisoning in children.

In the present study, benzodiazepine anxiolytics represented the main group of medicines involved in poisonings. In a study by Anderson et al.,23 carried out in the United Kingdom, benzodiazepines represented 19% of poisoning cases, reinforcing that these substances often cause accidents. In an investigation by Azkunaga et al. (Spain),20 paracetamol held the first place (12.9%), followed by benzodiazepines (10.3%). Benzodiazepines are among the most used medicines in Brazil, considering all pharmaceutical classes,24 making them easily available in the domestic environment. Furthermore, we should consider the possibility that, in some cases, they were intentionally used, but this information was omitted in the report made at the time of treatment.

The category of substances involved and the child’s age showed some differences. In children <2 years old, the incidence of chemicals/cleaning products was higher, while poisoning by medicines was more prevalent in those older than two years. In the study by Brito and Martins,12 children under one year of age presented a greater number of cases of pesticide poisoning (66.6%); from one to four years, the main agents were cleaning products; and between five and nine years, pharmacological products (66.6%) had a higher incidence. Children’s easy access to different types of substances could be responsible for the different age patterns found.5,21 The chemical substances involved can also change according to availability. In rural areas, pesticides are usually involved.18,25 In places that require hydrocarbon fuels to produce energy and heat for homes, due to the relative scarcity of electric power supply, this group becomes more common.22 Thus, product availability at home and ease of access are clearly potential risk factors.

We highlight the incidence of poisoning caused by chemicals used in domestic activities (detergents, soap powder, bleach, drain cleaners); they can be found in most households in liquid form, are often inadequately stored, and their colorful aspect is attractive to children. In addition, these products are frequently sold in PET bottles without an identification label to inform their origin and provide instructions for safe use.26

Many accidents with caustic substances resulted from the domestic manipulation of these products. In some cases reported in this study, the caregiver declared having at home, at the time of the accident, a mixture made of different products, with caustic soda as the main ingredient, to prepare homemade soap. This practice can be dangerous, especially in households with young children and without the constant supervision of an adult.

Regarding pesticides, including carbamates, one of the main issues is their illegal trade for home use as a rodenticide. In Brazil, they are only legal for agricultural use.27

The effectiveness of adult supervision is hindered by how fast a child can get involved in an accident. Kouéta et al.22 and Tavares et al.10 did not identify a higher incidence of poisoning associated with a lack of supervision. In a control case study, Ramos et al.5 revealed that the risk fraction attributable to caregiver inattention was 13%, while for dangerous products stored at low heights, it represented 19%. These findings suggest that making the house safe by appropriately storing products out of the reach of children can be a more effective strategy.

In our study, only one victim died, resulting in a case fatality rate of 0.2%, which can be considered very low. In Colombia (2009), a study identified 187 deaths by poisoning, representing a mortality rate of 0.6 cases per 100 thousand inhabitants and a case fatality rate of 9.5 per 100 thousand poisoned patients.28 In a study by Kouéta et al.,22 3% of cases progressed to death, of which 75% corresponded to poisoning of children aged one to four years. Death by medicine poisoning is more prevalent in children under four years of age and is usually accidental.29 The low case fatality rate observed in the present study could be associated with the fact that the treatment was carried out in a very well equipped reference unit, with professional teams that have extensive experience in the care of victims of poisoning. Moreover, most accidents involved only one substance, mainly medicines and cleaning products of low risk. As the interval between accident and treatment was not systematically recorded, we could not assess its impact on case fatality rate and length of stay.

Data from the present study show that 15% of the accidental poisoning in children and adolescents treated at the emergency care resulted in hospitalization; the length of stay of the vast majority was up to two days. In a study by Brito and Martins,12 24.4% of the victims were hospitalized.

The World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund recommend substituting potentially toxic domestic products by similar ones with a more benign profile, as well as providing immediate care and specialized information as strategies to prevent child poisoning and reduce associated lesions.1

One of the limitations of our study is the use of secondary data, based on patient treatment forms, preventing us from controlling the quality of the information registered in the medical records. The study was based on hospital treatments, restricting the extrapolation of our findings to the community. On the other hand, we emphasize that we conducted the study in a referral hospital in accidents and violence, which favors the representativeness of the findings in clinical environments, that is, it allows the comparison with other similar services.

In conclusion, accidental exogenous poisoning was higher in children aged one to two years, males, and those who live in Belo Horizonte. The main causative agents of exogenous poisoning were medicines, followed by cleaning products and chemicals. Living outside Belo Horizonte and ingesting multiple substances were risk factors for hospitalization among victims who sought emergency care for poisoning. The pattern of products and substances involved, the age profile, and the predominance of poisoning by ingestion in the domestic environment indicate that opportunities for preventive actions might have been missed

REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization. World Report on Child Injury Prevention. Geneva: WHO; 2008. [ Links ]

2. Wynn PM, Zou K, Young B, Majsak-Newman G, Hawkins A, Kay B, et al. Prevention of childhood poisoning in the home: overview of systematic reviews and a systematic review of primary studies. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2016;23:3-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2015.1032978 [ Links ]

3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz. Sistema Nacional de Informações Tóxico-Farmacológicas. Casos Registrados de Intoxicação Humana por Agente Tóxico e Faixa Etária - Brasil; 2007 [cited 2016 Jul 7]. Available from: Available from: https://sinitox.icict.fiocruz.br/dados-nacionaisLinks ]

4. Almeida TC, Couto CC, Chequer FM. Perfil das intoxicações agudas ocorridas em uma cidade do Centro-Oeste de Minas Gerais. Rev Eletronica Farm. 2016;13:151-64. https://doi.org/10.5216/ref.v13i3.39923 [ Links ]

5. Ramos CL, Targa MB, Stein AT. Caseload of poisoning among children treated by the Rio Grande do Sul State Toxicology Information Center (CIT/RS), Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21:1134-41. https://doi.org//S0102-311X2005000400015 [ Links ]

6. Schmertmann M, Williamson A, Black D, Wilson L. Risk factors for unintentional poisoning in children aged 1-3 years in NSW Australia: a case-control study. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-13-88 [ Links ]

7. Soori H. Developmental risk factors for unintentional childhood poisoning. Saudi Med J. 2001;22:227-30. [ Links ]

8. Ramos CL , Barros HM, Stein AT , Costa JS. Risk factors contributing to childhood poisoning. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010;86:435-40. https://doi.org/10.2223/JPED.2033 [ Links ]

9. Werneck GL, Hasselmann MH. Profile of hospital admissions due to acute poisoning among children under 6 years of age in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Assoc Med Bras(1992) . 2009;55:302-07. [ Links ]

10. Tavares EO, Buriola AA, Santos JA, Ballani TS, Oliveira ML. Factors associated with poisoning in children. Esc Anna Nery. 2013;17:31-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1414-81452013000100005 [ Links ]

11. Domingos SM, Borghesan NB, Merino MF, Higarashi IH. Poison-related hospitalizations of children aged 0-14 at a teaching hospital in Southern Brazil, 2006-2011. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016;25:343-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742016000200013 [ Links ]

12. Brito JG, Martins CB. Accidental intoxication of the infant-juvenile population in households: profiles of emergency care. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49:373-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000300003 [ Links ]

13. Manouchehrifar M, Derakhshandeh N, Shojaee M, Sabzghabaei A, Farnaghi F. An epidemiologic study of pediatric poisoning; a six-month cross-sectional study. Emerg (Tehran). 2016;4:21-4. [ Links ]

14. Kohli U, Kuttiat VS, Lodha R, Kabra SK. Profile of childhood poisoning at a tertiary care centre in North India. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:791-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-008-0105-7 [ Links ]

15. Fook SM, Azevedo EF, Costa MM, Feitosa IL, Bragagnoli G, Mariz SR. Avaliação das intoxicações por domissanitários em uma cidade do Nordeste do Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 2013;29:1041-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2013000500021 [ Links ]

16. Alves VM, Silva MAS, Magalhães APN, Andrade TG, Faro ACM, Nardi AE. Suicide attempts in a emergency hospital. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2014;72:123-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20130212 [ Links ]

17. Azkunaga B, Mintegi S, Salmón N, Acedo Y, Del Arco L, et al. Poisoning in children under age 7 in Spain. Areas of improvement in the prevention and treatment. An Pediatr (Barc). 2013;78:355-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2012.09.016 [ Links ]

18. Z’gambo J, Siulapwa Y, Michelo C. Pattern of acute poisoning at two urban referral hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. BMC Emerg Med. 2016;16:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0068-3 [ Links ]

19. Ahmed A, AlJamal AN, Mohamed Ibrahim MI, Salameh K, AlYafei K, Zaineh SA, et al. Poisoning emergency visits among children: a 3-year retrospective study in Qatar. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0423-7 [ Links ]

20. Azkunaga B , Mintegi S , Del Arco L , Bizakarra I. Changes in the epidemiology of poisonings attended in Spanish pediatric emergency departments between 2001 and 2010: increase in ethanol intoxication. Emergencias. 2012;24:376-79. [ Links ]

21. Schmertmann M , Williamson A , Black D . Leading causes of injury hospitalization in children aged 0-4 years in New South Wales by injury submechanism: a brief profile by age and sex. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48:978-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02590.x [ Links ]

22. Kouéta F, Dao L, Yé D, Fayama Z, Sawadogo A. Acute accidental poisoning in children: aspects of their epidemiology, etiology, and outcome at the Charles de Gaulle Pediatric Hospital in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Santé (Montrouge, France). 2009;19:55-9. https://doi.org/10.1684/san.2009.0157 [ Links ]

23. Anderson M, Hawkins L, Eddleston M, Thompson JP, Vale JA, Thomas SH. Severe and fatal pharmaceutical poisoning in young children in the UK. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101:653-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309921 [ Links ]

24. Guimarães ACO. Uso e abuso de benzodiazepínicos: revisão bibliográfica para profissionais de saúde da atenção básica [monografia]. Belo Horizonte (MG): UFMG; 2013. [ Links ]

25. Lira SV, Silva JG, Abreu RN, Moreira DP, Vieira LJ, Frota FA. Intoxicações por pesticidas em crianças, adolescentes e jovens no município de Fortaleza (CE). Cienc Cuid Saude. 2009;8:48-55. https://doi.org/10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v8i1.7772 [ Links ]

26. Souza RO, Seixas Filho JT, Miranda MG, Carvalho Neto FM. O impacto dos produtos domissanitários na saúde da população do Complexo do Alemão - Rio de Janeiro. Quim Nov. 2015;37:93-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0104-8899.20150025 [ Links ]

27. Corrêa CL, Zambrone FA, Cazarin KC. Chumbinho poisoning: challenge to clinical diagnosis and treatment. Rev Bras Toxicol. 2004;17:71-8. [ Links ]

28. Álvarez AA, Carrillo AA. General measures in the emergency department for pediatric patients poisoned. Univ Med (Bogotá). 2012;53;154-65. [ Links ]

29. Mota DM, Melo JR, Freitas DR, Machado M. Profile of mortality by intoxication with medication in Brazil, 1996-2005: portrait of a decade. Cien Saude Colet. 2012;17:61-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000100009 [ Links ]

Funding

This study did not receive funding

Received: April 03, 2018; Accepted: August 30, 2018; Published: November 08, 2019

*Corresponding author. E-mail: fernando.madalena.volpe@gmail.com (F. M. Volpe)

The authors declare no conflict of interests

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License