SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.48 issue10Organic acid carriers in tolerance to toxic aluminum in wheatHematological profile of captive bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) from Northeastern Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Ciência Rural

Print version ISSN 0103-8478On-line version ISSN 1678-4596

Cienc. Rural vol.48 no.10 Santa Maria  2018  Epub Sep 21, 2018

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170708 

FORESTRY SCIENCE

Oxidizable fractions of soil organic carbon in Caatinga forest submitted to different forest managements

Frações oxidáveis do carbono orgânico do solo em Caatinga arbórea submetida a manejo florestal

Suellen Gomes Monteiro Batista1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-7338

Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-Garcia2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8559-2927

Alessandro de Paula2 

Divino Levi Miguel2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6019-3690

Willyan Charles Amaral Batista1 

1Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brasil.

2Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola e Solos, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), 45083-900, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brasil.


ABSTRACT:

One of the main alternatives for the rational exploitation of the Caatinga biome’s natural resources is sustainable forest management. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and its fractions can be used to evaluate the conservation status of forest ecosystems after anthropic interventions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of different forest management practices on the distribution of SOC fractions in the Caatinga area located in Contendas do Sincorá National Forest (BA). Three forest management practices (clear cutting, selective cutting by diameter and selective cutting by species) were evaluated, using the unmanaged Caatinga as a control. Soil samples were collected at the 0-10cm depth. The SOC was fractionated into four fractions (F1’, F1, F2 and F3), adopting the chemical wet oxidation method based on increasing degrees of oxidation. The forest management caused a short-term change in the oxidizable fraction distribution of the SOC, which was reflected by a reduction of the most labile fractions.

Key words: organic matter; chemical fractionation; labile carbon

RESUMO:

Umas das principais alternativas para a exploração racional dos recursos naturais da Caatinga é o manejo florestal sustentável. O carbono orgânico do solo (COS) e suas frações podem ser utilizados para avaliar o estado de conservação de ecossistemas florestais após intervenções antrópicas. Sendo assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito de curto prazo de diferentes práticas de manejo florestal sobre a distribuição das frações do COS em área de Caatinga arbórea, localizada na Floresta Nacional Contendas do Sincorá (BA). Foram avaliadas três práticas de manejo florestal (corte raso, corte seletivo por diâmetro e corte seletivo por espécie), utilizando como testemunha a Caatinga não manejada. As amostras de solo foram coletadas na profundidade de 0-10cm. O COS foi fracionado em quatro frações (F1’, F1, F2 e F3), adotando-se o método químico da oxidação úmida baseada em graus crescentes de oxidação. O manejo florestal ocasionou alteração em curto prazo na distribuição das frações oxidáveis do COS, que se refletiu em redução das frações mais lábeis.

Palavras-chave: matéria orgânica; fracionamento químico; carbono lábil

The Caatinga is a characteristic biome of northeastern Brazil and extends through eight states in this region to the north of Minas Gerais state (GUERRA et al., 2014). Despite being a biome with representative biodiversity, its vegetation cover has been severely reduced by the indiscriminate exploitation of wood for fire wood and charcoal, and by the expansion of agricultural activities.

Among the actions that can be adopted for rationally exploiting natural resources of the Caatinga is sustainable forest management (FM), which is a set of interventions carried out in a forest area aiming sustainable production from the economic, environmental and social points of view (MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT- MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE - MMA, 2008).

Different forest management practices are usually adopted in the Caatinga biome with clear cutting and selective cutting by minimum diameter (≤5cm) and by species (EMBRAPA, 2007; MMA, 2008) being the main practices. According to their potential for interference, such practices can lead to different levels of change in various components of the ecosystem, such as plant composition and soil attributes.

Among the soil chemical attributes, soil organic carbon (SOC) has been frequently used in assessing the conservation status and sustainability of forest ecosystems, since it exerts an influence on practically all soil processes from aggregation to nutrient supply to the plants (ZINN et al., 2002). However, minor changes in SOC may not be detected in the short term (CHAN et al., 2001; OLIVEIRA JÚNIOR et al., 2008). For this reason, studying the distribution of SOC in labile or stable fractions of soil organic matter (SOM) has been adopted which expresses differences in its storage time in the soil (BAYER et al., 2004), and shows changes in organic C quality before differences even occur in their total content (XAVIER et al., 2006; BARRETO et al., 2011).

Different methodologies are employed to fractionate SOC. The method proposed by CHAN et al. (2001) consists of chemical fractionation, which enables the separation of four fractions with increasing degrees of oxidation starting from an acid gradient (GUARESCHI et al., 2013). The first two fractions are considered to be of greater lability; and therefore, are usually more responsive to soil changes. The latter two fractions are less labile and are more related to compounds possessing higher chemical stability and molar mass (RANGEL et al., 2008).

In general, the oxidizable C fractions show that management systems favoring frequent additions of organic residues to the soil tend to have a higher C proportion in the labile fraction compared to the recalcitrant fraction (CHAN et al., 2001; BATISTA et al. al., 2014). Thus, knowledge on the distribution of SOC fractions in managed forest areas can enable evaluating changes in the dynamics of SOM compartments, and can help indicate the most appropriate forest management to maintain soil characteristics. However, studies related to this subject are still scarce, especially in Caatinga conditions.

In view of the above, this research had the objective of evaluating the short-term effect of different forest management practices on the distribution of SOC fractions in Caatinga forest submitted to different forest management practices.

The study was conducted in Contendas do Sincorá National Forest (FLONA), located in the municipality of Contendas do Sincorá, Bahia, which presents a flat relief and a hot semiarid climate (BSwh - Koppen classification). The FLONA covers an area of 11,216ha and has predominant vegetation classified as Caatinga vegetation/trees, with frequent species of Myracrodruon urundeuva, Schinopsis brasiliensis, Tabebuia sp., Aspidosperma pyrifolium and Cereus jamacarus (LIMA & LIMA, 1998).

The study area in FLONA consists of four treatments which correspond to three types of forest management and one condition of no implemented management: (a) clear cutting (CC)-consisted of cutting and removing all trees; (b) selective cutting 1 (SC1)-cutting of all trees with diameter at breast height (DBH) of 5cm or more; (c) selective cutting 2 (SC2)-selectively cuttingonly individuals of three species: Commiphora leptophloeos (Mart.) J.B. Gillett, Pseudobombax simplicifolium A. Robyns and Jatropha mollisima (Pohl.)Baill; and (d) Control (C) -unmanaged Caatinga, used as a reference.

Forest management was carried out in May 2015 by demarcating four plots of 20x20m (400m2) for each treatment, totaling 16 plots, which were randomly chosen in the experimental area. Before management, the studied area was in a late successional stage, considering that the last interventions for wood extraction dated from the year of 1997 (MMA, 2006).

The soil of the experimental area belongs to the Eutrophic Red-Yellow Argisol Class (EMBRAPA, 2006), presents a loose texture (clay=195g kg-1, sand=393g kg-1 and silt=412g kg-1) and the following chemical characterization: pH=6.4, P=3.5mg dm-3, total N=1.5g kg-1, K+=0.21cmolc dm-3, Ca2+=4.1cmolc dm-3, Mg2+=1.8cmolc dm-3, H+Al=1.9 cmolc dm-3; according to methodologies described in EMBRAPA (2017).

Soil and litter samples were collected in May 2016. Ten (10) simple soil samples (depth 0-10cm) were collected in each experimental plot, which were collected to form a composite sample. The accumulated litter was collected using a square collector of 0.25m2 (0.50x0.50m), which was randomly cast once on the forest floor of each plot.

For determining the SOC fractions, the wet oxidation method proposed by CHAN et al. (2001) was adopted, along with modifications proposed by MENDONÇA & MATOS (2005). The following were added to Erlenmeyer flasks: 0.5g of sifted and macerated soil, 10ml of 0.167mol L-1K2Cr2O7 and concentrated sulfuric acid quantities of 2.5, 5, 10 and 20ml. This fractionation allowed for preparing four acidic aqueous solutions resulting from the proportions of 0.25:1, 0.5:1, 1:1 and 2:1, corresponding to 3, 6, 9 and 12mol L-1 of H2SO4, respectively. Oxidation was carried out with an external heat source (150°C) and titration of the obtained extracts was carried out with 0.5mol solution of Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2.H2O L-1, using three drops of diphenylamine indicator.

Four fractions were then determined by comparing the C concentrations obtained with increasing degrees of oxidation: fraction 1’ (F1’), corresponding to the oxidizable SOC in a solution of 3mol L-1; fraction 1 (F1), determined by the difference between the SOC obtained in the solutions of 6 and 3mol L-1; fraction 2 (F2), obtained by the difference between SOC extracted in the solution of 9mol L-1 and 6mol L-1; and fraction 3 (F3), which is the residual organic C between the reactions with the 12 and 9mol L-1 solutions.

Fractions were evaluated separately for better interpretation of the obtained results (F1’, F1, F2and F3) and also associated (F1’+F1and F2+F3), according to BARRETO et al. (2011), with the objective to verify differences not detected by the analysis of the isolated fractions. Thus, F1’+ F1 was considered to consist of more easily oxidizable C compounds, and F2 + F3 constituted of more resistant organic compounds.

The relative participation of the oxidizable fractions in relation to the SOC and to the ratio (F1’+F1):(F2+F3), which represents the predominant form of C in the soil. Values of this ratio greater than one indicate a predominance of C in more labile forms, while smaller values demonstrate that more recalcitrant forms of C are in greater proportion in the soil.

Data were analyzed for homogeneity and normality by the Cochran and Lilliefors tests. Since the data were parametric, means were compared by the Dunnet test at a 5% significance level, and the analysis of variance was performed according to a completely randomized design, presenting a significant result in the F-test (P<0.05). In addition, Pearson correlations (α=5%) were established between litter, SOC and carbon fractions. Statistical analyzes were performed using the SAEG® v.9.1 software program.

Soil organic carbon did not vary among treatments (mean of 16.1g kg-1) (Table 1), demonstrating that the different management did not lead to short-term changes in the total organic matter content in the soil. According to BAYER et al. (2004), changes in SOM usually occur slowly, requiring medium- and long-term studies to better detect variations.

Table 1 Total organic carbon, oxidizable fractions of organic carbon and their relative contributions in soil under Caatinga trees submitted to forest management. 

Fractions ------------------------Treatments(1)---------------------------
CC SC1 SC2 C
-------------------------------------Carbon g kg-1----------------------------------
CO(2) 15.80 (3.5)a 15.72 (3.9)a 15.52 (5.0)a 15.99 (1.2)a
F1(2) 6.22 (3.2)a 5.70 (1.9)a 6.04 (1.2)a 6.10 (1.7)a
F1 2.60 (1.5)b 3.42 (1.7)b 1.93 (1.9)b 5.83 (2.1)a
F2 4.40 (3.0)a 2.23 (1.8)a 3.15 (2.4)a 2.06 (1.4)a
F3 2.58 (2.0)a 4.37 (2.3)a 4.40 (2.6)a 2.00 (1.5)a
-------------------------------Relative Contribution %(3)------------------------------
F1 39.37 (7.7) (4)a 36.26 (5.7)a 39.92 (7.2)a 38.15 (4.6)a
F1 16.46 (7.7)b 21.76 (5.8)b 12.44 (7.2)b 36.46 (4.9)a
F2 27.85 (4.4)a 14.19 (3.9)b 20.30 (3.1)a 12.88 (4.8)b
F3 16.33 (5.9)b 27.80 (4.5)a 28.35 (9.6)a 12.51 (6.3)b
F1’+F1 55.82 (6.1)b 58.02 (6.5)b 51.35 (9.9)b 74.61 (4.9)a
F2+F3 44.18 (9.9)a 41.98 (7.4)a 48.65 (7.1)a 25.39 (4.3)b
(F3+F4):(F1+F2) 1.26 (9.0)b 1.38 (9.7)b 1.16 (9.5)b 2.96 (4.5)a

(1)CC- Clear cutting; SC1 -Selective cutting 1; SC2 -Selective cutting 2; C-Control; (2)CO -Total soil organic carbon; F1’ - C oxidized by K2Cr2O7in acid medium of 3 molH2SO4 L-1; F1-difference of C oxidized by K2Cr2O7in acid medium of 6 and 3 mol H2SO4 L-1; F2-differenceofC oxidized by K2Cr2O7in acid medium of 9 and 6 mol H2SO4 L-1; F3- difference of C oxidized by K2Cr2O7in acid medium of 12 and 9 molH2SO4 L-1; F1’+F1-labile fractions; F2+F3- recalcitrant fractions.(3)Relative contribution of each of the oxidizable C fractions in relation to the total soil organic C. (4)Values in parentheses refer to the standard deviation of the mean (n = 8). The same lowercase letters in the line that compare the C content and the percentages of each fraction associated with CO between the treatments did not differ among them by the Dunnet test at 5%.

The highest accumulations of oxidizable C were observed in the very labile fraction (F1’) in all treatments (Table 1). However, this fraction was not differentiated between treatments, being between 5.7 and 6.2g kg-1 and representing an average of 38% of the SOC content (Table 1). These results are in agreement with ROSSET et al. (2016), who observed that F1’ contributed with about 32% of the total organic C in soils under native forest and pasture (0-5cm layer).

Conversely, the labile carbon fraction (F1) showed variation between the treatments (Table 1), being higher in the control (5.83g kg-1) in relation to the treatments (2.65g kg-1) (Table 1). This result suggested that the absence of intervention in the vegetation favored the C accumulation in this fraction, possibly due to the maintenance of the continuous contribution of litter. The participation of F1 in SOC was 37% in the control and 17% in the other treatments. In studying the Caatinga area in Ceará, MAIA et al. (2007) found a F1 contribution close to that observed in the control condition in the present study (37%).

The fractions F1’ and F1 together (F1’ + F1) represented 75% of the SOC in the control and approximately 55% in the different treatments (Table 1). Several studies in soils under native and planted forests also reported that the oxidizable fractions of greater lability constituted a greater proportion of the SOC, and when associated they corresponded to values of higher than 40% (MAIA et al., 2007; BARRETO et al., 2011; ROSSET et al., 2016).

The greater contribution of F1’+ F1 in the unmanaged Caatinga showed that all the adopted practices promoted a reduction in C accumulation in greater lability fractions. It is probable that this result is due to the partial or total removal of the vegetation in the managed areas, which caused a decrease in the leaf contribution and an increased accumulation of more recalcitrant residues on the soil (crop residues). This explanation is corroborated by the litter composition accumulated in the studied treatments, which showed a greater participation of branches (45 to 73%) and lower leaves (15 to 35%) in areas submitted to management in relation to the control (branches=35%; leaves>55%).

In this sense, significant positive correlations were reported between F1 fraction and leaf litter stock (r=0.61, P<0.05) and between F2 fraction and total litter accumulation (r=0.65 and r=0.68, P<0.05, respectively). Wood materials such as branches usually present high lignin contents; a compound that is highly resistant to decomposition, and which favors higher C accumulation in the slightly labile fraction (SWIFT et al., 1979). Thus, these correlations suggested that because the litter components present variations in their degradability degree, they would be favoring an accumulation of moderately labile or slightly labile forms of C in the soil.

In addition to the quality of the plant residues deposited in the soil, reductions in the more labile SOC fractions can also be related to greater exposure of the C fractions to the decomposing microorganisms or to an elevation in soil temperature and moisture (CASTRO FILHO et al., 1991).

The moderately labile (F2) and slightly labile (F3) fractions did not vary between treatments (Table 1). This absence in variation can be related to the fact that this study was carried out in a short period of time after the forest management (only one year), which would not have been enough to express differences in the less labile fractions, since these have a greater soil stability characteristic (RANGEL et al., 2008). Together, the F2+F3 fractions represented an average of 40% of total SOC. These results are similar to those of GUARESCHI et al. (2013), who observed that F2+F3 contributed close to 31% of SOC in a native Cerrado area.

The ratio (F1’+F1):(F2+F3) was higher in the unmanaged Caatinga (2.94) when compared to the other treatments (mean of 1.23) (Table 1). This relation was positively correlated with the leaf litter stock (r=0.71, P<0.01). These results are in agreement with those discussed previously, indicating that the increase in the recalcitrant accumulated litter level of the managed areas promotes a change in the quality of organic C accumulated in the soil.

The results obtained in this research revealed that forest management triggers short-term changes in the quality of SOM regardless of the type of practice adopted, which caused a decrease in the SOC levels of the most labile fractions. These fractions corresponded to 75% of the SOC in the unmanaged areas, and 55% in the managed areas.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq, for granting financial support to the project.

REFERENCES:

BARRETO, P.A.B. et al. Distribution of oxidizable organic C fractions in soils under cacao agroforestry systems in Southern Bahia, Brazil. Agroforestry Systems, v.81, p.213-220, 2011. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9300-4 >. Accessed: Mar. 21, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10457-010-9300-4. [ Links ]

BATISTA, I. et al. Oxidizable fractions of total organic carbon and soil macrofauna in a crop-live stock integration system. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, v.38, p.797-809, 2014. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832014000300011 >. Accessed: Jun. 12, 2016. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832014000300011. [ Links ]

BAYER, C. et al. Carbon storage in labile fractions of soil organic matter in a tropical no-tillage Oxisol. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.39, p.677-683, 2004. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2004000700009 >. Accessed: Jun. 13, 2016. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2004000700009. [ Links ]

CASTRO FILHO, C. et al. Tillage methods and soil and water conservation in southern Brazil. Soil Tillage, Amsterdam, v.20, p.271-283, 1991. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(91)90043-W >. Accessed: Jul. 18, 2016. doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(91)90043-W. [ Links ]

CHAN, K.Y. et al. Oxidizible organic carbon fractions and soil quality changes in an oxic paleustalf under different pasture leys. Soil Science, v.166, p.61-67, 2001. [ Links ]

EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA - EMBRAPA. Preservação da Caatinga, Embrapa Semi-Árido. Brasília, DF. (ABC da Agricultura Familiar, 16). 2007. 39 p. [ Links ]

EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA - EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. Manual de métodos de análise de solo. 3.ed. rev. E ampl. Brasília, 2017. Online. Available from: <Available from: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/bitstream/doc/1088695/1/Pt2Cap17RelacoesmolecularesKieKr.pdf >. Accessed: Aug. 04, 2017. [ Links ]

EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA - EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos (Rio de Janeiro). Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de solos. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro, 2006. 306 p. [ Links ]

GUARESCHI, R.F. et al. Oxidizable carbon fractions in Red Latosol under different management systems. Revista Ciência Agronômica, v.44, p.242-250, 2013. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902013000200005 >. Acessed: Jun. 13, 2016. doi: 10.1590/S1806-66902013000200005. [ Links ]

GUERRA, A.M.N. et al. Phytosociological study of two environments in the Caatinga of the Moacir Lucena Settlement, Apodi - RN - BRAZIL. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, v.9, p.141-150, 2014. Available from: <Available from: https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/2214 >. Accessed: May 15, 2016. [ Links ]

MAIA, S.M.F. et al. Organic carbon pools in a Luvisol under agroforestry and conventional farming systems in the semi-arid region of Ceará, Brazil. Agroforestry Systems, v.71, p.127-138, 2007. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9063-8 >. Accessed: Apr. 13, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10457-007-9063-8. [ Links ]

MENDONÇA, E.S.; MATOS, E.S. Matéria orgânica do solo: Métodos de análises, Viçosa: UFV, 2005. 108 p. [ Links ]

MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE - MMA. Plano de Manejo da Floresta Nacional Contendas do Sincorá, 2006. 132 p. Online. Available from: <Available from: http://www.icmbio.gov.br >. Accessed: May 15, 2017. [ Links ]

MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE - MMA. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas. Manejo sustentável dos recursos florestais da Caatinga. Programa Nacional de Florestas. Unidade de Apoio do PNF no Nordeste. Natal: MMA, 2008. 28p. [ Links ]

OLIVEIRA JÚNIOR, A.C. et al. Chemical indicators of the quality of organic matter of soil from the Rio das Mortes watershed under different coffee plant managements. Química Nova, v. 31, n. 7, p.1733-1737, 2008. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422008000700026 >. Accessed: Jun. 10, 2016. doi: 10.1590/S0100-40422008000700026. [ Links ]

RANGEL, O.J.P. et al. Oxidizible organic carbon fractions in a latosol cultivated with coffee at different planting spacings. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v.32, p.429-437, 2008. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542008000200013 >. Accessed: Jun. 10, 2016. doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542008000200013. [ Links ]

ROSSET, J.S. et al. Chemical and oxidizable fractions of soil organic matter under different management systems in an Oxisol. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.51, n.9, p.1529-1538, 2016. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000900052 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2017. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2016000900052. [ Links ]

SWIFT, M.J. et al. The influence of resource quality on decomposition processes. In: Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1979, p.118-166. [ Links ]

XAVIER, F.A.S. et al. Microbial biomass and light organic matter in soils under organic and conventional systems in the Chapada da Ibiapaba - CE, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, v.30, p.247-258, 2006. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832006000200006 >. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2017. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832006000200006. [ Links ]

ZINN, Y. L. et al. Soil organic carbon as affected by afforestation with Eucalyptus and Pinus in the Cerrado region of Brazil. Forest Forest Ecology and Management, v.166, p.285-294, 2002. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00682-X >. Accessed: May 15, 2017. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00682-X. [ Links ]

CR-2017-0708.R1

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONSSGMB conducted the experiment and prepared the initial version of the manuscript. PABBG conceived, designed and supervised the research. AP participated in the design of the project. DLM and WCAB performed laboratory analyzes. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.

Received: October 04, 2017; Accepted: August 09, 2018; Revised: August 29, 2018

E-mail: patriciabarreto@uesb.edu.br. *Corresponding author.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License