Physiological response of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo mycorrhized by Sonoran desert native arbuscular fungi to drought and salinity stresses

ABSTRACT

Plants response to symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under water stress is important to agriculture. Under abiotic stress conditions native fungi are more effective than exotics in improving plant growth and water status. Mycorrhization efficiency is related to soil fungi development and energy cost-benefit ratio. In this study, we assessed the effect on growth, water status and energy metabolism of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo when inoculated with native AMF from the Sonoran desert Mexico (mixed isolate and field consortium), and compared with an exotic species from a temperate region, under drought, low and high salinity conditions. Dry weights, leaf water content, water and osmotic potentials, construction costs, photochemistry and mycorrhization features were quantified. Under drought and low salinity conditions, the mixed isolate increased plant growth and leaf water content. Leaf water potential was increased only by the field consortium under drought conditions (0.5-0.9 MPa). Under high salinity, the field consortium increased aerial dry weight (more than 1 g) and osmotic potential (0.54 MPa), as compared to non-mycorrhized controls. Plants inoculated with native AMF, which supposedly diminish the effects of stress, exhibited low construction costs, increased photochemical capacity, and grew larger external mycelia in comparison to the exotic inoculum.

Keywords:
Glomus; Pacispora; Water status; Construction cost; Photosynthesis

Introduction

Aquifer over exploitation in semi-arid agricultural regions has increased soil salinity and caused water shortage.¹ The direct effect of such increasing soil salinity on production has been documented in the coastal region of Hermosillo, Mexico.² One of the proposals for mitigating these negative effects is the use of biofertilizers based on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), given that mycorrhizic symbiosis improves the establishment, vigor, productivity and survival of plants under water stress and salinity.^3,4

The beneficial effects of AMF on plant development and soil features are considered relevant for sustainable agricultural management. However, conventional agriculture practices affect AMF diversity and density.⁵ Currently, isolated fungi species are used to colonize a wide variety of commercially important vegetables. Nonetheless, special interest has been given to characterization of native AMF species, since they are considered to be more efficient inoculates under environmental conditions similar to their origin, in contrast to exotic fungi from different environments.⁶

Since plant-AMF establish a compelled symbiosis, host responses to mycorrhization depend on the interaction efficiency between the symbionts, which in physiological terms is related to the amount of nutrients acquired by the host by unit of carbohydrates spent in supporting the guest. A study reporting the mycorrhization effect of Glomales on physiological and nutritional responses by several hosts found that water stress host tolerance varied depending on the associated AMF,³ and some fungi even diminished salinity and drought injuries.^7,8

Ecophysiological studies found that mycorrhized plants response is better when accomplished by native strains. Apparently, this phenomenon is related to the fungi's environmental sensibility and to external mycelia development, which modifies water retention soil capacity and host water relations.^9,10

Given the chemical composition of a plant, it is possible to estimate construction costs, defined as the total amount of photo-assimilates used for the construction of a gram of plant tissue, which is considered a useful measurement for evaluating plant development.¹¹ Symbiosis may indirectly stimulate carbon fixation, eliminating symbiosis related costs in the plant energy budget providing a real benefit for both parts.¹² Although the daily carbon flux between plant and fungus does not change, the final costs vary in relation to characteristics unique to each association. The resources efficient assimilation and the optimal biomass partition are determinant to the competitive ability and, in many cases, tolerance to stress conditions by hosts.¹³

One way of assessing the physiological response of mycorrhized plants subjected to stress is by measuring photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Pinior et al.¹⁴ found that mycorrhization with Rhizophagus intraradices (N.C. Schenck and G.S. Sm.) C. Walker and A. Schüßler increased the tolerance of Rosa hybrid L. to water stress by increasing its photosynthetic activity, specifically in electron transport in photosystems I and II. Chlorophyll-a fluorescence analysis allowed the evaluation of AMF influence in reintroduced plants during their acclimation by quantifying the conservation of photosynthetic energy.¹⁵

Since it is possible to establish mycorrhization effects by evaluating host through assessing the photosynthetic and metabolic energies, in this work we evaluated some of the physiological responses to drought and salinity stresses in Cucurbita pepo var. pepo mycorrhized with native fungi from the Sonoran desert, with the objective of relating such changes in energy metabolism with a possible reduction of injuries caused by those stresses. Differences in plant growth and water status depend on the inoculum geographic origin. Mycorrhization with native organisms adapted to the stressing conditions improves cost-benefit ratio of association.

Materials and methods

Isolation of inoculates

Two native AMF treatments were used in this study, a mixed isolate (MI) with two types of spores: Glomus sp. 1 (42 spores g^-1) and Glomus sp. 4 (24 spores g^-1), as well as a field consortium (FC) with seven types of spores: Glomus sp. 1 (103 spores g^-1), Claroideoglomus claroideum (N.C. Schenck and G.S. Sm.) C. Walker and A. Schüßler (90 spores g^-1), R. intraradices (34 spores g^-1), Pacispora sp. 1 (27 spores g^-1), Glomus sp. 3 (11 spores g^-1), Glomus sp. 4 (10 spores g^-1), Pacispora sp. 2 (7 spores g^-1). AMF were selected from 9 abandoned fields in La Costa de Hermosillo (LCH), Sonora (28°35'-28°50' N, 111°15'-111°35' W). Field soils had salinity of 0.9 up to 5.2 dS m^-1, pH 8, sodium adsorption ratio of 3, exchangeable sodium percentage of 3.5 and 70% of sand; dominated by Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt., Baccharis sarothroides A. Gray, and Encelia farinosa A. Gray ex Torr. The seven most frequently isolated AMF were included in this study. In order to increase the number of MI spores, Sorghum bicolor L. was cultivated with Glomus sp. 1 and 4, and for FC spores by cultivating C. pepo var. pepo in soil samples from LCH, obtaining an inoculum comprised of seven morphospecies of AMF.

Culture conditions and inoculate treatments

Five seeds of C. pepo var. pepo were planted in 5 L pots with a sterile substrate (5:2 peat moss: soil). Plants were grown under natural lightning until flowering, at 26.5% relative humidity and 24 °C. For each treatment, 6 replicates were made, keeping three plants per pot. In all experiments, inoculation was performed 10 d after planting, and treatments were established by inoculating hosts as follow: Inoculation of each plant with 3 g of mixed isolate of native AMF (treatment MI), and 1.5 g of the field consortium (FC). A third treatment was an exotic species, 1 g of C. claroideum, from a temperate region of Central Mexico from Hueyotlipan, Tlaxcala (treatment EI). This strain was not included in FC. Negative controls for each stress treatment consisted in plants without AMF which received 1 g of sterile soil as inoculate (treatment C).

Stress by drought and salinity

Experiments to evaluate mycorrhization effects on plant responses to drought and salinity exposure were executed by separate. The first experiment was run for 57 d and evaluated the effects of drought and AMF inoculation on C. pepo var. pepo. While the second experiment dealt with responses to high and low salinity and lasted 47 d. Assessment of drought effects took place in the summer, while salinity experiments were carried out in the fall. Plants subjected to drought stress were irrigated with 25-50 mL per day (soil humidity of 25-40%). Soil moisture was determined gravimetrically. Low salinity stress was created by irrigating plants with a 40 mM NaCl solution, maintaining a salinity of 3.8 ± 1.2 dS m^-1. High salinity was achieved by irrigation with a 50 mM NaCl solution to maintain a mean salinity of 4.5 dS m^-1 (3.5-6 dS m^-1). Salinity was measured based on samples electrical conductivity values according to Shirokova et al.¹⁶ Non-stressed (no drought, neither salinity) controls, were irrigated with 100 mL of water per day (soil moisture content of 50-60% and 1.4 ± 0.4 dS m^-1).

Response assessment

Total dry weights (both aerial and radicular) were measured by drying soil debris-free plant material in a lab oven (Blue M Stabil-Therm, model D-5226-Q, Evansville, IN, USA) at 60 °C for 72 h. Leaf water content was quantified by the difference between leaf sections fresh and dry weights and expressed on a percentage basis. Water potential (Ψ_w) was quantified with a Scholander pump (PMS Instrument Co., Albany, OR, USA). Samples were frozen at -80 °C to obtain the intracellular exudate of the foliar tissue and then measure their osmolarity (Ci, mmol/kg) with an osmometer (Wescor Vapor 5520, Logan, UT, USA). Results of osmolarity were converted to osmotic potential (Ψ_s) through the Van'T Hoff equation: Ψ_s = -CiRT, where Ci refers to osmolarity, R gases constant and T to temperature (°K).

To estimate construction costs, leaves were harvested from every plant on each treatment and dried at 60 °C for 24 h. Glucose was estimated from the amount of carbon and energy required for tissue construction (g glucose g^-1dry weight) by measuring the combustion heat (ΔH_C) with a Parr calorimeter pump (model 1341, Moline, IL, USA), the ashes (A) in a muffle furnace (Thermolyne type, model 30400, New York, NY, USA), and nitrogen content (N) (LECO PF-528, St. Joseph, MI, USA). Resulting values were used to estimate the construction costs (CC) according to Carey et al.¹⁷:

$\mathrm{CC}=\frac{\left[\left(0.06968\Delta H_C-0.065\right)\left(1-A\right)+0.5359kN\right]}{E_G}$

where k is the oxidation state of the nitrogenized substrate (ranging from +5 nitrates to +3 ammonium) and E_G is the conversion efficiency (0.89).¹⁸

Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured at 25-28 °C with a Handy PEA fluorimeter (Hansatech Instruments Ltd., King's Lynn, NO, England) equipped with a three high-intensity light emitting diode array at an excitation wavelength of 650 nm and an emission wavelength range of 680-750 nm, over a foliar surface of 4 mm in diam. Readings were taken at 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 2, and 30 mm on the third leaf from the meristem after keeping the measured leaf section in absence of light for 30 min.

Evaluated variables included basal fluorescence intensity (F₀), maximum fluorescence intensity (F_m), and time to reach maximum fluorescence (T_fmax). These values were used to estimate the absorbed-electron flux per surface unit index (ABS/CS), the excitons canalized to the reaction center per surface unit index (TRo/CS), and the amount of electrons transferred to the electron transport chain for estimation of chemical energy (Et0/CS). Based on these values, the performance index (PI) was calculated using the equation, through the Handy PEA 32 bit Windows^® software, as in Strasserf et al.¹⁹:

$\mathrm{PI}=\frac{\mathrm{Abs}}{\mathrm{CS}}*\frac{\mathrm{TRo}}{\mathrm{CS}}*\frac{\mathrm{EtO}}{\mathrm{CS}}$

Mycorrhization was evaluated by processing samples through the wet-sieving method. The total number of spores (TNS) was quantified, morphospecies for each sample were identified through the saccharose floating method, and by visualization in an optical microscope. Mycorrhizal colonization (MC) was evaluated by dying with trypan blue 10-150 mg of dry root (45 °C). To measure the external mycelia, 0.02-0.25 g aliquot parts of sieved material were placed in a microscope slide with glycerin and the number of hyphae was quantified counting the amount found along four evenly spaced lines marked in the cover slip. This methodology was based on that described by Herrera-Peraza et al.²⁰

To identifying morphospecies, spores were separated using stereo microscope and then mounted on polyvinyl-lacto-glycerol (PVLG) and PVLG/Melzer (1:1 v/v) to observe the different structures through an optical compound microscope (Axioskop 2 plus, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Morphospecies were numbered as they were found through the samples, separating those identified to a described genus from those that were not identified. Morphospecies were classified by size, color, spore-wall thickness, presence and width of germinating walls, ornamentation, attachment to a suspending hypha, and the Melzer reaction based on the descriptions available on the International Culture Collection of Vesicular and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi website (http://invam.wvu.edu), http://www.agro.av.szczecin.pljblazkowski/index.html website, and the original descriptions of morphospecies.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with general linear models using NCSS v2007.²¹ All data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) for a completely randomized design in a factorial arrangement of 4 × 2 (drought stress) and 4 × 3 (salinity stress). Results for radicular and aerial dry weights, aerial:radicular weight ratios, leaf water content, water and osmotic potentials, and construction costs for treatments (MI, FC and EI) were compared to negative controls (C) for each condition: irrigated, drought stressed, normal salinity, low salinity and high salinity. To analyze mycorrhization features (external mycelia, mychorrizal colonization, and total number of spores), data obtained from treatments MI and FC were compared to those from treatment EI. The development of each one of the morphospecies was estimated by the amount of spores (total and per species) of the six replicates. Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) by a combination of factors were compared based on standard error. For mycorrhization characteristics with high salinity an ANOVA was applied and statistical differences of means were compared by Tukey-Kramer (p ≤ 0.05) method.

Results

Table 1 shows growth, water status, and construction costs for control plants (C), as well as the mean differences for mycorrhized plants. The differences in plant growth grown irrigated or drought stresses were not statistically significant. Values for aerial:radicular ratio (A:R), aerial dry weight (ADW) and radicular dry weight (RDW) were similar when comparing the results obtained for non-inoculated controls and the different AMF inoculates (MI, FC and EI).

Table 1
Effects of the mycorrhizal inoculation of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo irrigated (I) and stressed with drought (D). The assessed variables were: aerial dry weight (ADW), radicular dry weight (DRW), aerial: radicular dry weight ratio (A:R), foliar water content (water), osmotic potential (Ψ _s), water potential (Ψ _w), and construction costs (CC, g G/D: grams of glucose per dry weight).

		ADW (g)	RDW (g)	A:R	Water (%)	Ψs (MPa)	Ψw (MPa)	CC (g G/D)
I	MI	6.5 ± 0.10	0.16 ± 0.01	42.0 ± 3.5	90.0 ± 0.4	-1.1 ± 0.07	-1.2 ± 0.01	151.1 ± 1.86
	FC	6.9 ± 0.12	0.14 ± 0.01	49.9 ± 4.0	88.9 ± 0.6	-1.1 ± 0.04	-1.6 ± 0.05	162.8 ± 0.93
	EI	6.7 ± 0.14	0.17 ± 0.01	40.6 ± 2.5	89.4 ± 0.6	-1.6 ± 0.14	-1.6 ± 0.07	173.8 ± 0.92
	C	6.6 ± 0.08	0.15 ± 0.01	45.9 ± 3.8	88.2 ± 0.5	-1.1 ± 0.04	-1.3 ± 0.03	155.8 ± 0.99
D	MI	4.9 ± 0.08	0.24 ± 0.01	21.2 ± 1.7	90.7 ± 0.2	-1.3 ± 0.03	-1.0 ± 0.03	186.1 ± 1.26
	FC	4.6 ± 0.23	0.22 ± 0.02	22.8 ± 2.7	89.5 ± 0.7	-1.1 ± 0.07	-1.0 ± 0.02	184.7 ± 1.74
	EI	4.2 ± 0.08	0.14 ± 0.00	30.5 ± 1.6	87.4 ± 0.6	-1.3 ± 0.13	-0.9 ± 0.01	187.9 ± 0.48
	C	3.9 ± 0.15	0.16 ± 0.01	25.5 ± 1.6	85.9 ± 1.3	-1.2 ± 0.04	-1.4 ± 0.01	180.1 ± 1.00
Significance p ≤ 0.05
S		0.00	0.00	0.00	0.16	0.73	0.00	0.00
M		0.00	0.02	0.39	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
S × M		0.00a	0.00a	0.04a	0.07	0.01a	0.00a	0.00a

• These values correspond to the mean ± standard error of the results for the mixed inoculums (MI), field consortium (FC), exotic inoculums (EI) and control (C). Factorial analysis ^asignificance p ≤ 0.05 among the stress treatment (S) and mycorrhization (M).

After 57 d of culture with irrigated treatment, changes in some variables related to the plant water status were observed when comparing C with the AMF inoculated treatments. A 0.7% decline in foliar water content was detected for MI, 0.33 vs. 0.6 MPa in Ψ_s for EI and FC respectively. Also, the construction cost was less for FC (0.12 g of glucose g^-1 of foliar weight) compared with C. In the 47 d cultures with normal salinity, the water status of AMF inoculated plants was similar and the construction cost was equal or larger (0.02 g of glucose g^-1 of dry weight for EI) with respect to C, except for MI, where Ψ_w increased in 0.9 MPa and construction costs declined in 0.08 g of glucose g^-1 of dry weight (Table 2).

Table 2
Effects of the mycorrhizal inoculation of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo normal salinity (NS) and stressed with low salinity (LS). The assessed variables were: aerial dry weight (ADW), radicular dry weight (DRW), aerial: radicular dry weight ratio (A:R), foliar water content (water), osmotic potential (Ψ _s), water potential (Ψ _w), and construction costs (CC, g G/D: grams of glucose per dry weight).

		ADW (g)	RDW (g)	A:R	Water (%)	Ψs (MPa)	Ψw (MPa)	CC (g G/D)
NS	MI	5.7 ± 0.35	0.28 ± 0.03	20.9 ± 1.9	86.8 ± 0.9	-1.2 ± 0.08	-2.8 ± 0.31	151.8 ± 0.6
	FC	5.8 ± 0.52	0.30 ± 0.03	19.8 ± 2.2	87.3 ± 0.4	-1.2 ± 0.03	-3.5 ± 0.27	166.0 ± 1.0
	EI	4.5 ± 0.40	0.29 ± 0.01	16.0 ± 1.7	86.5 ± 0.5	-1.1 ± 0.05	-3.6 ± 0.19	172.0 ± 0.5
	C	4.9 ± 0.16	0.28 ± 0.01	17.5 ± 1.2	86.1 ± 0.7	-1.2 ± 0.04	-3.7 ± 0.15	165.9 ± 0.6
LS	MI	7.7 ± 0.78	0.19 ± 0.02	40.9 ± 1.8	82.2 ± 0.5	-1.8 ± 0.06	-2.4 ± 0.42	145.7 ± 0.6
	FC	7.0 ± 0.52	0.20 ± 0.01	36.4 ± 1.8	83.8 ± 0.6	-1.6 ± 0.01	-2.4 ± 0.36	155.5 ± 1.0
	EI	4.8 ± 0.34	0.21 ± 0.01	23.0 ± 2.4	79.7 ± 0.7	-1.5 ± 0.12	-3.5 ± 0.42	164.1 ± 0.3
	C	4.5 ± 0.42	0.18 ± 0.02	25.6 ± 2.2	78.1 ± 1.0	-1.9 ± 0.10	-3.3 ± 0.28	145.3 ± 0.8
Significance p ≤ 0.05
S		0.01	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.04	0.00
M		0.00	0.65	0.00	0.00	0.03	0.01	0.00
S × M		0.04a	0.81	0.00a	0.01a	0.38	0.44	0.00a

• These values correspond to the mean ± standard error of the results for the mixed inoculums (MI), field consortium (FC), exotic inoculums (EI) and control (C). Factorial analysis ^asignificance p ≤ 0.05 among the stress treatment (S) and mycorrhization (M).

When stress by drought and inoculation with native AMF was applied (MI and FC), constructions costs were similar to C (Table 1). MI increased in ADW (1 g), foliar water content (4.5%) and Ψ_w (0.45 MPa) in relation to C. Minor increases were detected for FC, 0.6 g in ADW, 3.6% in foliar water content and 0.38 MPa in Ψ_w without decrease in Ψ_s. With the exotic species no differences were observed in most of the evaluated variables vs. C, except for the construction costs where an increase took place in EI (>0.03 g of glucose g^-1 of dry weight compared to C).

When low-salinity stress was applied (Table 2), the inoculates composed by native AMF (treatments MI and FC) produced an increase in ADW, A:R and foliar water content of the plants. On the other side, construction cost did not change with MI, while with FC it was 0.04 g of glucose g^-1 of dry weight more in relation to C. Under low-salinity stress, a larger benefit was observed in the increase of plant growth with the mixed native AMF inoculate in comparison to C (3 g of ADW and 15 units of A:R with MI in comparison to 2.5 g of ADW and 10 units of A:R quantified in FC). Foliar water content was improved with FC (5.7%), while with MI the difference was of 4.1%. In treatment EI, an increase of 0.9 g of glucose g^-1 dry weight in construction cost was observed in respect to C; however, no statistically significant differences were observed in growth and water status.

Under high-salinity, construction costs associated with FC was significantly higher than C (0.05 g of glucose g^-1 of dry weight). Compared to C, plants inoculated with FC increased 0.9 g of ADW, 36 units of A:R and radicular growth diminished (0.3 g); while MI and C were similar in RDW, AR, Ψ_s, and CC (Table 3).

Table 3
Mycorrhization characteristics and effects of the inoculation of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo with high salinity. The assessed variables were: aerial dry weight (ADW), radicular dry weight (DRW), aerial: radicular dry weight ratio (A:R), osmotic potential (Ψ _s), construction costs (CC, g G/D: grams of glucose per dry weight), external mycelium (EM), mycorrhizal colonization (MC), and total number of spores (TNS).

	ADW (g)	RDW (g)	A:R	Ψs (MPa)	CC (g G/D)	EM (mg/g of soil)	MC (%)	TNS (spores/10 g of soil)
MI	5.6a	0.09a	63.70a	-2.71a	176.49a	53.3a	15.4a	231.6ab
FC	5.3a	0.06b	88.48b	-1.95a	161.57b	61.5a	20.1a	169.6b
EI	5.4a	0.10a	52.85a	-2.45a	164.33ab	42.8a	22.3a	366.3a
C	4.4b	0.09a	52.22a	-2.16a	174.97a	0	0	0

• These values correspond to the mean of the results for the mixed inoculums (MI), field consortium (FC), exotic inoculums (EI) and control (C). Means with different letters in a column are different (Tukey-Kramer p ≤ 0.05).

The mycorrhization features for native inoculates were compared to those quantified with EI. It was observed that after 57 d without stress applied, the external mycelia were similar, while the percentage of MC and TNS was significantly lower for MI and FC with respect to EI. On the other hand, after 47 d in culture, the external mycelia for MI and FC was 10 mg g^-1 of soil less than in EI; MC was similar between all individuals and TNS only increased by 50 spores per 10 g^-1 of soil with FC vs. EI (Table 4).

Table 4
Mycorrhization characteristics in Cucurbita pepo var. pepo under conditions of stress by drought, low salinity and non-stressed. The assessed variables were external mycelium (EM), mycorrhizal colonization (MC), and total number of spores (TNS).

		EM			MC			TSN
		Non-stressed	Stressed		Non-stressed	Stressed		Non-stressed	Stressed
Drought	MI	33.3 ± 1.6	42.1 ± 2.6		12.3 ± 1.1	10.4 ± 0.5		160.1 ± 8	163.9 ± 11
	FC	43.0 ± 4.5	35.8 ± 3.4		11.5 ± 0.9	9.2 ± 0.9		202.9 ± 29	110.3 ± 17
	EI	42.6 ± 4.4	25.0 ± 1.5		17.9 ± 0.2	7.2 ± 0.4		249.4 ± 20	97.9 ± 08
	C	0	0		0	0		0	0
Low salinity	MI	35.5 ± 1.3	51.6 ± 1.7		24.2 ± 4.1	36.1 ± 4.1		93.6 ± 13	138.6 ± 22
	FC	39.5 ± 1.4	51.7 ± 1.2		29.9 ± 3.0	26.0 ± 0.4		152.0 ± 22	91.8 ± 15
	EI	49.8 ± 2.5	32.8 ± 1.2		22.1 ± 2.2	70.3 ± 4.0		96.5 ± 4	65.2 ± 12
	C	0	0		0	0		0	0
Significance p ≤ 0.05
Drought		0.05			0.00			0.00
Mycorrhization (M)		0.22			0.14			0.65
Drought × M		0.00a			0.00a			0.00a
Low salinity		0.02			0.00			0.21
Mycorrhization (M)		0.10			0.00			0.02
Low salinity × M		0.00a			0.00a			0.00a

• These values correspond to the mean ± standard error of the results for the mixed inocula (MI), field consortium (FC), exotic inocula (EI) and control (C). Factorial analysis ^asignificance p ≤ 0.05 among the stress treatment (drought or low salinity) and mycorrhization (M).

Under the three evaluated stress conditions, native AMF inoculates (MI and FC) presented a significantly higher growth of external mycelia (10-20 mg g^-1 of soil) than EI, at the high-salinity treatment a difference higher than 20 mg g^-1 of soil was found (Table 3). MC under drought conditions was similar between inoculates (Table 4), while salinity diminished the values for this variable with respect to EI, being 30% lower with native AMF (low-salinity treatment) and only 10% lower with MI (high-salinity treatment) (Table 4).

Fig. 1 shows differences in performance index (PI) between inoculation treatments were observed at day 45. The intervals for PI values were different between experiments for assessing drought (1-4 units), low salinity (0.3-1 units) and high-salinity (2-8 units). No significant differences were found among the different inoculation treatments under non-stressed conditions (Fig. 1B and D).

Fig. 1
Performance index (PI) assessed at 21, 27, 38 and 45 d in culture and calculated through readings of chlorophyll fluorescence in Cucurbita pepo var. pepo under conditions of drought (A), irrigated (B), low salinity (C), normal salinity (D), and high salinity (E). These values are the arithmetic mean for three replicates, vertical lines represent standard deviation. Treatment C (- - -), treatment EI (- - -), treatment FC (—), treatment MI (—). Symbols for each inoculation treatment are the same as in Table 1.

Performance index for C. pepo var. pepo applying drought is shown in Fig. 1A; when plants were treated with MI and FC, this index was higher than 3 units and significantly higher than EI (2.2 units) and C (1.8 units) after 45 d. Under low-salinity conditions (Fig. 1C), plants inoculated with native fungi exhibited a PI higher than 0.6 units and higher than EI (0.35 units), while the lowest value was measured for C (0.28 units). For cultures under high-salinity stress, the highest PI was detected for treatment FC (7.8 units), while this value was similar among cultures treated with MI and C (4-5 units) and higher in relation to plants treated with EI (2.21 units).

Table 5 shows the differences in spore content by morphospecies of native AMF inoculated on C. pepo var. pepo under conditions of stress by drought, low and high salinity, and non-stressed. When inoculating MI, regardless of stress condition, spore composition was Glomus sp. 1 and Glomus sp. 4 ranging from 80.2 to 89 and 11 to 19.8% respectively.

Table 5
Native AMF morphospecies composition inoculated onto Cucurbita pepo var. pepo following exposure to different drought and salinity stresses.

Morphospecies	Spore content (%)
	Drought						Salinity
	Non-stressed			Stressed			Non-stressed			Low			High
	MI	FC		MI	FC		MI	FC		MI	FC		MI	FC
C. claroideum		23.1			2.7			21.5			28.0			14.1
G. intraradices		5.5						0.4
Glomus sp. 1	87.0	54.5		89.0	78.2		81.9	60.5		80.2	47.1		82.1	56.2
Glomus sp. 2		1.2
Glomus sp. 3		2.2						2.7			18.5			4.8
Glomus sp. 4	13.0	10.4		11.0	14.3		18.1	5.6		19.8	3.2		17.9	14.5
Pacispora sp. 1		0.9			4.8			3.3			3.2			1.4
Pacispora sp. 2		2.2						6.0						9.0

• Spore content (%) was calculated based on the sum of spores (total and per species) of six replicates. Captions for each inoculation treatment are as in Table 1.

FC inoculated plants subjected to water stress yielded spores from only four morphospecies; according to their prevalence and in descending order, those were: Glomus sp. 1 > Glomus sp. 4 > Pacispora sp. > C. claroideum (Table 5). Under low salinity, a value of 47.1% was quantified for Glomus sp. 1, 28% for C. claroideum, 18.5% for Glomus sp. 3 and finally, 3.2% for Pacispora sp. and Glomus sp. 4. On the other hand, under high salinity conditions, 6 of the 7 inoculated morphospecies were found in the sporulate form. The lowest sporulation was found for Pacispora sp. (1.4%) and Glomus sp. 3. (4.8%); while the highest values corresponded to Glomus sp. 1 (56.2%). In all abiotic stress conditions, Glomus sp. 1 resulted in the highest spore count when plants were inoculated with FC.

Discussion

Previous ecological and agronomical studies demonstrated how plant-AMF associations mitigate the damaging effects caused by water scarcity and soil salinity, improving plant growth and water status in several species, in contrast with non-mycorrhized plants under equal stressing conditions.⁹ However, plant response to stress may also vary depending on the fungi species.^3,22,23 This study showed that symbiosis efficiency differed in relation to the inoculate composition and the origin of the AMF used. Under drought and salinity conditions, the dry weight and leaf water content of plants inoculated with an AMF species from a temperate region (EI) were similar to non-inoculated controls, while those inoculated with native AMF (MI and FC) did improved growth and water status (Tables 1 and 2).

Soil properties affect mycelium extension rate in several ways, since some AMF species are more susceptible to drought and saline conditions.^3,10,24 The stress conditions assessed in this study reduced C. claroideum extracellular growth in comparison to the native species used as inoculum, since under drought and salinity, the amount of mycelia produced by MI and FC was over 50% highest (Tables 3 and 4).

Beneficial effects of mycorrhization with native AMF in growth and water status of C. pepo var. pepo can be related to the high external mycelia growth in MI and FC. A similar response was described in Phaseolus vulgaris and Latuca sativa grown under water stress, because a direct relationship was established between the greatest increases in biomass, soil water potential, and leaf lethal water potential with those AMF producing the largest extracellular mycelia.^22,23

Salts and changes in water availability modify mycorrhizal colonization.²⁵ Largest mycorrhizal colonization in Citrus tangerine resulted in improved dry weight and relative water content when plants were grown under drought.⁷ Our results are in agreement since the inoculants that mitigated drought negative effects (MI and FC) produced larger root mycorrhization than exotic inoculants (EI), which did not improve neither growth, nor plant water status.

In contrast to observations under drought, with high and low salinity the colonization percentage is smaller with the more effective treatments (Tables 3 and 4). However this does not agree with reports in Latuca sativa grown under saline stress, where the most beneficial AMF species showed the highest colonization.³ Plants inoculated with native AMF (MI and FC) and grown under drought or low salinity showed a significant increase in growth and water status, maintaining tissue construction costs similar or lower than those of non-inoculated plants (Tables 1 and 2). In a previous study with C. pepo grown under drought conditions, mycorrhization with R. intraradices improved stomata conductance and water potential gradient when water-loss rates varied by transpiration, while gas exchange increased to compensate for the additional carbon transferred to fungi.²⁶

Performance index calculations, based in chlorophyll fluorescence readings, are measurements of plant relative vitality.¹⁹ Plant photochemistry assessment is a good indicator of its photoprotection under stress conditions,²⁷ additionally this sort of assessment has been done to evaluate vitality in mycorrhized plants in terms of energy use efficiency during molecule biosynthesis.^14,15 This study shows that the inoculation of native AMF (MI and FC) increased PI in comparison to non-stressed cultures and in relation to C and EI treatments, mostly under low salinity. Abo-Ghalia and Khalafallah²⁵ found that, mycorrhization of Triticum aestivum under drought improved photosynthetic rates and increased carotenoid pigments and chlorophyll to counteract against photodestruction or photoinhibition.

Differences in intervals, including PI, in experiments 1 (drought assessment) and 2 (low salinity assessment) might have affected by changes in light intensity and temperature, given that experiments took place in different seasons. These differences have been previously documented in other plant species submitted to light and temperature stress.²⁸

Mycorrhization implicates an increase in plant energy costs, however several studies prove that construction costs (CC) are lower when AMF improve efficiency in nutrient usage as well as the organism's adaptation to environmental conditions.²⁹ In this case, the negative effects of drought and salinity over growth and water status are smaller when plants are mycorrhized by native fungi (Tables 1 and 2). The greatest benefit was obtained from MI and FC, where CC were similar or lower than C, while their PI's were highest.

The benefits given by AMF in terms of nutrition and water use efficiency compensate the energy expenditure implied in the transference of photoassimilates to the fungus.³⁰ MI was most effective under stress by low salinity and drought, while FC was more effective under high salinity conditions. Additionally, there was an increased efficiency in the photochemistry capacity (measured through PI) in plants mycorrhized with native fungi, which suggests a compensation for the energy expend and carbon transference to the fungus. Thus tissue CC is similar or lower to those of plants associated with less effective AMF (EI).

Saline conditions either destroy PSII reaction centers or interrupt electron transference,³¹ such effects are mitigated when plants are associated with AMF by increasing chlorophyll content and photosynthetic capacity with respect to non-mycorrhized cultures.^32,33 Changes in photosynthetic capacity are related to water status and gas exchange³⁴ and also to electron transport capacity. In this study, under high salinity conditions, the greatest increase in PI was observed in those cultures grown in substrates inoculated with FC, which exhibited less damage by salts, allowing to the conservation of CC similar to non-mycorrhized plants and implying a similar efficiency to the non-stressed negative control (Table 3, Fig. 1E).

Even though the AMF-plant interaction is slightly specific, there are biochemical characteristics involved with the plant-fungus association function, which modify the success of the symbiosis.³⁵ Even there are AMF ecotypes better adapted to certain environmental conditions.^10,24 In the native inoculates (MI and FC), Glomus sp. 1 demonstrated to be most efficient in sporulation, despite all the assessed conditions. Thus, it is considered that this species associates better with C. pepo var. pepo and is adapted to the assessed stress conditions.

Also, some of the morphospecies initially present in FC showed no sporulation under drought or salinity stresses (Table 5). The variations in AMF diversity observed in these experiments were similar to those found in wheat inoculated with a mixed isolate of Glomus spp. under stress by drought, in which species diversity decreased as water availability abated.²⁵

Conclusion

AMF native from the Sonoran Desert mitigated the harmful effects of stress by drought and salinity on growth and water status of C. pepo var. pepo in comparison with C. claroideum native from a temperate region. The mixed inoculate MI, composed of two morphospecies of native AMF was the most beneficial under conditions of drought or low salinity. Under high salinity, the field consortium composed of 7 morphospecies of native AMF (FC) resulted better for plant adaptation to this stress condition. Benefits were related to the high amounts of external mycelia quantified in the soil, low CC, and to an increase of photochemical capacity measured as PI.

Acknowledgments

We thank the financial support of project IAI-CRN II-14, US-NSF (GEO-04523250) and to CONACYT-Mexico for granting a PhD scholarship to CH. Thanks to J. Llano (UNISON), L. Contreras-Angulo and J. Antonio Orozco (CIAD) for their technical assistance. Thanks are also in order to MSc. L. Hernández-Cuevas (Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala) for providing the C. claroideum inoculate.

References

• ¹
  United Nations. Convention to Combat Desertification IOP Publishing Physics Web; 2010. Available from: http://www.unccd.int/convention/text/convention.php http://www.unccd.int/convention/text/convention.php http://www.unccd.int/convention/text/convention.php Accessed 10.11.10.
  » http://www.unccd.int/convention/text/convention.php
• ²
  Castellanos AE, Martínez MJ, Llano JM, Halvorson WL, Espiricueta M, Espejel I. Successional trends in Sonora Desert abandoned agricultural fields in northern Mexico. J Arid Environ 2005;60:437-455.
• ³
  Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcón R. Symbiotic efficiency and infectivity of an autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal Glomus sp. from saline soils and Glomus deserticola under salinity. Mycorrhiza 2000;10:137-143.
• ⁴
  Hawkes C, Kivlin S, Rocca J, Huguet V, Thomsen M, Blake K. Fungal community responses to precipitation. Glob Change Biol 2011;17:1637-1645.
• ⁵
  Gianinazzi S, Gollotte A, Binet MN, Van Tuinen D, Redecker D, Wipf D. Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza 2010;20:519-530.
• ⁶
  Bothe H, Turnau K, Regvar M. The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in protecting endangered plants and habitats. Mycorrhiza 2010;20:445-457.
• ⁷
  Wu QS, Zou YN, Xia RX, Wang MY. Five Glomus species affect water relations of Citrus tangerine during drought stress. Bot Stud 2007;48:147-154.
• ⁸
  Khalil SE, El-Noemani AS. Effect of bio-fertilizers on growth, yield, water relations, photosynthetic pigments and carbohydrates contents of Origanum vulgare L. plants grown under water stress conditions. Am Eurasian J Sustain Agric 2015;9:60-73.
• ⁹
  Marulanda A, Barea JM, Azcón R. An indigenous drought-tolerant stain of Glomus intraradices associated with a native bacterium improves water transport and root development in Remata sphaerocarpa Microb Ecol 2006;52:670-678.
• ¹⁰
  Herrera-Peraza RA, Hamel C, Fernández F, Ferrer RL, Furrazola E. Soil-strain compatibility: the key to effective use of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants? Mycorrhiza 2011;21:183-193.
• ¹¹
  Poorter H, Pepin S, Rijkers T, de Jong Y, Evans JR, Korner C. Construction costs, chemical composition and payback time of high- and low-irradiance leaves. J Exp Bot 2006;57:355-371.
• ¹²
  Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis London, UK: Academic Press; 2008.
• ¹³
  Grimoldi AA, Kavanová M, Lattanzi FA, Schäufele R, Schnyder H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on carbon economy in perennial ryegrass: quantification by ¹³CO₂/¹²CO₂ steady-state labelling and gas exchange. New Phytol 2006;172:544-553.
• ¹⁴
  Pinior A, Grunewaldt-Stöcker G, Von Alten H, Strasserf RJ. Mycorrhizal impact on drought stress tolerance of rose plants probed by chlorophyll a fluorescence, proline content and visual scoring. Mycorrhiza 2005;15:596-605.
• ¹⁵
  Zubek S, Turnau K, Tsimilli-Michael M, Strasserf RJ. Response of endangered plant species to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Mycorrhiza 2009;19:113-123.
• ¹⁶
  Shirokova Y, Forkutsa I, Sharafutdinova N. Use of electrical conductivity instead of soluble salts for soil salinity monitoring in Central Asia. Irrig Drain Syst 2000;14:199-205.
• ¹⁷
  Carey EV, Callaway RM, DeLucia EH. Stem respiration of ponderosa pines grown in contrasting climates: implications for global climate change. Oecologia 1997;111:19-25.
• ¹⁸
  Williams K, Percival F, Merino J, Mooney HA. Estimation of tissue construction cost from heat of combustion and organic nitrogen content. Plant Cell Environ 1987;10:725-734.
• ¹⁹
  Strasserf RJ, Srivastava A. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochem Photobiol 1995;61:32-42.
• ²⁰
  Herrera-Peraza RA, Furrazola E, Fernandez-Valle R, Torres Y. Functional strategies of root hairs and arbscular mycorrhizae in evergreen tropical forest, Sierra del Rosario, Cuba. Rev CENIC Cienc Biol 2004;35:113-123.
• ²¹
  Hintze J. NCSS 2007. Kaysville, UT: NCSS, LLC; 2007. Available from: http://www.ncss.com http://www.ncss.com http://www.ncss.com
  » http://www.ncss.com
• ²²
  Marulanda A, Azcón R, Ruiz-Lozano JM. Contribution of six arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal isolates to water uptake by Latuca sativa plants under drought stress. Physiol Plant 2003;119:526-553.
• ²³
  Aroca R, Ruíz-Lozano JM, Zamarreño AM, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis influences strigolactone production under salinity and alleviates salt stress in lettuce plants. J Plant Physiol 2013;170:47-55.
• ²⁴
  Juniper S, Abbott LK. Soil salinity delays germination and limits growth of hyphae from propagules of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 2006;16:371-379.
• ²⁵
  Abo-Ghalia HH, Khalafallah AA. Responses of wheat plants associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to short-term water stress followed by recovery at three growth stages. J Appl Sci Res 2008;4:570-580.
• ²⁶
  Augé RM, Toler HD, Sams CE, Nasim G. Hydraulic conductance and water potential gradients in squash leaves showing mycorrhiza-induced increases in stomatal conductance. Mycorrhiza 2008;18:115-121.
• ²⁷
  Tambussi EA, Casadesus J, Munné-Bosch S, Araus JL. Photoprotection in water-stressed plants of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum): changes in chlorophyll fluorescence, spectral signature and photosynthetic pigments. Funct Plant Biol 2002;29:35-44.
• ²⁸
  Sarijeva G, Knapp M, Lichtenthaler HK. Differences in photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll and carotenoid levels, and in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in green sun and shade leaves of Ginkgo and Fagus J Plant Physiol 2007;164:950-955.
• ²⁹
  Nagel JM, Griffin KL. Construction cost and invasive potential: comparing Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae) with co-occurring native species along pond banks. Am J Bot 2001;88:2252-2258.
• ³⁰
  Bever JD, Richardson SC, Lawrence BM, Holmes J, Watson M. Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism. Ecol Lett 2009;12:13-21.
• ³¹
  Stoeva N, Kaymakanova M. Effect of salt stress on the growth and photosynthesis rate of salt bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Cent Euro Agric 2008;9:385-392.
• ³²
  Sheng M, Tang M, Chen H, Yang B, Zhang F, Huang Y. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 2008;18:287-296.
• ³³
  Heikham E, Rupam K, Bhoopander G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review. Ann Bot 2009;104:1263-1280.
• ³⁴
  Al-Khaliel AS. Effect of salinity stress on mycorrhizal association and growth response of peanut infected by Glomus mosseae. Plant Soil Environ 2010;56:318-324.
• ³⁵
  Bucher M. Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces. New Phytol 2006;173:11-26.

Edited by

Associate Editor: Ieda Mendes

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Jan-Mar 2018

History

• Received
  16 June 2016
• Accepted
  5 Apr 2017