Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Myocardial Injury Biomarkers and Cardiac Complications Associated with Mortality in Patients with COVID-19

Abstract

Background

SARS-CoV-2 is an emerging RNA virus associated with a severe acute respiratory disease known as COVID-19. Although COVID-19 is predominantly a pulmonary disease, some patients have severe cardiovascular damage. We performed a quantitative evidence synthesis of clinical data, myocardial injury biomarkers, and cardiac complications associated with in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

We searched the databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify studies comparing clinical data, myocardial injury biomarkers, and cardiac complications between non-survivors and survivors of COVID-19. Effect sizes were reported as mean difference or standardized mean difference for continuous variables and risk ratio for dichotomous variables with 95% confidence intervals. A random effects model was used to pool the results.

Results

Six retrospective studies reporting data from 1,141 patients (832 survivors and 309 non-survivors) were included. We found that underlying cardiovascular conditions; elevation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and creatine kinase-MB; and cardiac complications were associated with increased risk of death for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Conclusions

The confirmation that underlying cardiovascular conditions, elevation of myocardial injury biomarkers during COVID-19 infection, and acute cardiovascular decompensation are predictors for mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection must encourage new research to clarify potential mechanisms and test appropriate treatments. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(2):273-277)

Coronavirus; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Mortality

Resumo

Fundamento

O SARS-CoV-2 é um vírus de RNA emergente associado à doença respiratória aguda grave conhecida como COVID-19. Embora a COVID-19 seja predominantemente uma doença pulmonar, alguns pacientes apresentam graves danos cardiovasculares. Realizamos uma síntese de evidências quantitativas de dados clínicos, biomarcadores de lesão miocárdica e complicações cardíacas associadas ao óbito hospitalar em pacientes com COVID-19.

Métodos

Buscamos nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase e Google Scholar para identificar estudos que comparassem dados clínicos, biomarcadores de lesão miocárdica e complicações cardíacas entre pacientes sobreviventes e não sobreviventes da COVID-19. Os tamanhos dos efeitos foram apresentados como diferença média ou diferença média padronizada para variáveis contínuas e razão de risco para variáveis dicotômicas, com intervalos de confiança de 95%. Foi utilizado um modelo de efeitos aleatórios para agrupar os resultados.

Resultados

Foram incluídos seis estudos retrospectivos que relataram dados de 1.141 pacientes (832 sobreviventes e 309 não sobreviventes). Verificamos que condições cardiovasculares subjacentes; elevação de troponina cardíaca I de alta sensibilidade; N-terminal do pró-hormônio do peptídeo natriurético do tipo B e creatina quinase-MB; e complicações cardíacas foram associadas ao aumento do risco de óbito em pacientes com infecção por SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusões

A confirmação de que condições cardiovasculares subjacentes, elevação de biomarcadores de lesão miocárdica durante a infecção por COVID-19 e descompensação cardiovascular aguda são preditores de mortalidade na infecção por SARS-CoV-2 deve incentivar novas pesquisas para esclarecer possíveis mecanismos e testar tratamentos adequados. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(2):273-277)

Coronavírus; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Mortalidade

Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus that leads to an emerging infectious disease with remarkable pulmonary involvement, known as COVID-19. In addition to the hypothesis that cardiac patients are more susceptible to COVID-19 infection via ACE2 receptor dysregulation, preliminary individual reports have shown that patients with previous cardiovascular disease are at a higher risk of adverse outcomes. Moreover, patients who present any clinical or biological marker of acute cardiac involvement during COVID-19 infection are less likely to survive.11. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):P1054-62.

Although acute cardiac involvement, whether clinical or revealed by biomarkers, has been described as a common condition among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and it is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital death,22. Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 25. [Epub ahead of print]. current available evidence is based on individual studies with potentially overlapping data.33. Bauchner H, Golub RM, Zylke J. Editorial concern-possible reporting of the same patients with COVID-19 in different reports. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1256. Therefore, a synthesis of evidence can help confirm these findings. In this study, we performed a quantitative evidence synthesis of clinical data, myocardial injury biomarkers, and cardiac complications associated with in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.44. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. Given the urgent need for this review, PROSPERO registration was not sought.

We searched the databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify studies comparing clinical data, myocardial injury biomarkers, and cardiac complications between non-survivors and survivors of COVID-19. We included only studies with clinical data that provided, at least, concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI). Patients were considered to have acute myocardial injury if serum levels of hs-cTnI were above the 99thpercentile upper reference limit (URL). Heart failure was defined when the serum level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) exceeded the normal range and in the presence of associated symptoms, such as dyspnea, orthopnea, and lower extremity edema. Arrhythmia was defined as rapid ventricular tachycardia lasting more than 30 seconds, inducing hemodynamic instability and/or ventricular fibrillation, and clinically significant bradycardia on electrocardiography. We excluded publications with potentially overlapping reports based on data collection and setting and studies from which data extraction was not possible. In the event of potentially overlapping data, we selected the study with the most complete information.

Reports were screened in two stages, screening of titles and abstracts followed by the retrieval and screening of full-text articles. Searches were performed from January 1, 2020 to April 14, 2020, without language restrictions. The reference lists of all eligible studies and reviews were also evaluated to identify additional studies for inclusion. The following search terms were used: “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, and “coronavirus”. All COVID-19 reports, irrespective of cardiovascular topic, were reviewed.

Data from publications were extracted by two authors and crosschecked for accuracy. Our outcome of interest was in-hospital death. Clinical data (age, sex, and existing comorbidities), myocardial injury biomarkers (hs-cTnI, NT-proBNP, and creatine kinase-MB [CK-MB]), and cardiac complications (acute cardiac injury, heart failure, and arrhythmias) were considered independent variables.

The Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies of the National Institutes of Health (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) was used to grade the quality of each study. This tool is composed of 14 items that evaluate the representativeness and selection of the sample, description and measurement of exposure, follow-up of participants, and treatment of confounding factors. The findings were discussed qualitatively. Disagreements were resolved by discussion.

Effect sizes were reported as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous variables and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To calculate MD and SMD, means and standard deviations (SD) of myocardial injury biomarkers were obtained for each study. If the means and SD were not directly reported in the publication, indirect methods of extracting estimates were used.55. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):135. , 66. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13. When data were not presented in tables or in the text and the authors could not be reached, data were extracted using WebPlotDigitizer graph digitization software (available at http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer). Not all studies reported data on all predictor variables, and the pooled analysis was estimated from the data available for each variable.

A random effects model was used to pool the results, and 2-tailed p < 0.05 was used to determine significance. Cohen’s classification was used to interpret magnitude of the effect size for myocardial injury biomarkers. SMD > 0.8 was considered a large effect size. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified by the I22. Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 25. [Epub ahead of print]. index, and potential for publication bias was analyzed for hs-cTnI using Egger’s regression test and visual inspection of funnel plots. Because of the small number of studies reporting data for NT-proBNP and CK-MB, analysis of publication bias was not performed. Analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane IMS, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Results

After screening 8,091 titles and abstracts, 31 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 25 studies were excluded, seven of which were due to potentially overlapping data. Six retrospective studies11. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):P1054-62. , 77. Cao J, Tu WJ, Cheng W, Yu L, Liu YK, Hu X, et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 102 patients with corona virus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr. [Epub ahead of print].

8. Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, Yan W, Yang D, Chen G, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1295.

9. Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 27. [Epub ahead of print].

10. Wang L, He W, Yu X, Hu D, Bao M, Liu H, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in elderly patients: characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4-week follow-up. J Infect. 2020;80(6):639-45.
- 1111. Zhang F, Yang D, Li J, Gao P, Chen T, Cheng Z, et al. Myocardial injury is associated with in-hospital mortality of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A single center retrospective cohort study. medRxiv. 2020;17:2020.03.21.20040121. were included, providing data from 1,141 patients (633 male and 508 female) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 832 survivors and 309 non-survivors. Details of included studies are shown in Table 1 .

Table 1
Characteristics of included studies and clinical data of patients with COVID-19, including in-hospital deaths

The risk of bias of the studies is showed in e-Table 1 in the supplemental digital content. All studies had clear objectives and eligibility criteria, recruited subjects from the same population, and described the definitions of exposure factors and outcomes. However, studies have not been able to determine whether the sample size was representative for the population. In addition, none of the studies performed analysis for adjustment of confounding factors.

Results of meta-analysis showed differences in age between groups. Non-survivors of COVID-19 were older compared to survivors (MD = 14.3 years, 95% CI 9.2 to 19.4). Male sex (RR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4), the presence of existing hypertension (RR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4), and cardiovascular disease (RR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 7.8) were also associated with increased risk of mortality.

The meta-analysis of myocardial injury biomarkers showed a large increase in hs-cTnI (SMD = 1.0, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.2), NT-proBNP (SMD = 1.1, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.4), and CK-MB (SMD = 1.0, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.8) in non-survivor patients. Elevated hs-cTnI values above the 99thpercentile URL were associated with 8-fold increase in the risk of in-hospital death (RR = 8.0, 95% CI 2.2 to 28.5). No evidence of substantial publication bias was observed for hs-cTnI. Cardiac complications, including acute cardiac injury (RR = 8.9, 95% CI 4.2 to 19.3), heart failure (RR = 5.1, 95% CI 2.5 to 10.7), and arrhythmias (RR= 4.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 10.9) were found to be risk factors for COVID-19 related death. Comparisons of clinical data, myocardial injury biomarkers, and cardiac complications between non-survivors and survivors of COVID-19 are displayed in Table 2 . Forest plots and funnel plots are shown in the supplemental digital content (e-Figures 1 – 3).

Table 2
Comparison of clinical data, myocardial injury biomarkers, and cardiac complications between non-survivors and survivors of COVID-19

Discussion

Surveillance of cardiovascular events associated with COVID-19 seems very warranted.1212. Elkind MSV, Harrington RA, Benjamin IJ. The role of the American Heart Association in the Global COVID-19 pandemic. Circulation. 2020;141(15):e743-45. This study confirms and better quantifies the association between myocardial injury biomarkers and/or acute cardiac complications with in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19. However, it remains unclear whether acute cardiac involvement is primarily provoked by SARS-CoV-2 or whether it is a multifactorial non-specific cardiac involvement of a severe systemic infection.1313. Ferrari R, Di Pasquale G, Rapezzi C. What is the relationship between Covid-19 and cardiovascular disease? Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;310:167-8. It has been proposed that SARS-CoV-2 may lead to cardiac injury via multiple mechanisms including direct viral invasion of cardiomyocytes and subsequent myocarditis, since viral particles have been identified in myocardial cells.1414. Tavazzi G, Pellegrini C, Maurelli M, Belliato M, Sciutti F, Bottazzi A, et al. Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(5):911-5. However, changes in cTnI over time and the absence of typical signs on echocardiography and ECG in patients with COVID-19 have suggested that myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 is more likely related to systemic consequences of disease.1515. Deng Q, Hu B, Zhang Y, Yan J, Ping H, Zhou Q, et al. Suspected myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19: Evidence from front-line clinical observation in Wuhan, China. Int J Cardiol. 2020 July 15;311:116-21.

Other plausible mechanisms that have been suggested to explain troponin elevation in this scenario include type 1 and, mainly, type 2 myocardial infarction due to acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, cytokine storm, and even Takotsubo syndrome.1616. Tan W, Aboulhosn J. The cardiovascular burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a focus on congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;309:70-7. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 infection may either induce new cardiac injuries and/or act as a precipitating factor to worsen underlying cardiovascular diseases and lead to death.

In this meta-analysis, we analyzed well-established biomarkers for myocardial injury diagnosis and outcome prediction. Elevation of hs-cTnI, NT-proBNP, and CK-MB were associated with increased risk of death in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Management of patients with myocardial injury biomarkers and acute cardiovascular decompensation is primarily based on supportive care and individualized approach to better guide treatment. Unfortunately, we do not have evidence to guide the proper use of antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, β-blockers, ACE inhibitors, and statins in this critical scenario, and we must adapt the current knowledge.1717. Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Solomon SD, Vardeny O. Potential effects of coronaviruses on the cardiovascular system. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 27. [Epub ahead of print]. For instance, it has recently been suggested that renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors could be deleterious or beneficial for patients with COVID-19,1818. Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, McMurray JJ V, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 23382:1653-9. but we lack definitive evidence for this decision.

The findings of this study should be treated with caution. Its main limitations include the following: (1) Studies are limited to a single region and this has reduced our ability to verify possible population variability; (2) there was a moderate to high between-study heterogeneity, and (3) studies did not perform analysis for adjustment of confounding factors and their results were based on standard univariate models.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis confirms that underlying cardiovascular conditions, elevation of myocardial injury biomarkers during COVID-19 infection, and acute cardiovascular decompensation are predictors for mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further studies are needed to clarify potential mechanisms of cardiovascular injury and test appropriate treatments.

Referências

  • 1
    Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):P1054-62.
  • 2
    Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 25. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 3
    Bauchner H, Golub RM, Zylke J. Editorial concern-possible reporting of the same patients with COVID-19 in different reports. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1256.
  • 4
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
  • 5
    Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):135.
  • 6
    Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13.
  • 7
    Cao J, Tu WJ, Cheng W, Yu L, Liu YK, Hu X, et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 102 patients with corona virus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 8
    Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, Yan W, Yang D, Chen G, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1295.
  • 9
    Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 27. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 10
    Wang L, He W, Yu X, Hu D, Bao M, Liu H, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in elderly patients: characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4-week follow-up. J Infect. 2020;80(6):639-45.
  • 11
    Zhang F, Yang D, Li J, Gao P, Chen T, Cheng Z, et al. Myocardial injury is associated with in-hospital mortality of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A single center retrospective cohort study. medRxiv. 2020;17:2020.03.21.20040121.
  • 12
    Elkind MSV, Harrington RA, Benjamin IJ. The role of the American Heart Association in the Global COVID-19 pandemic. Circulation. 2020;141(15):e743-45.
  • 13
    Ferrari R, Di Pasquale G, Rapezzi C. What is the relationship between Covid-19 and cardiovascular disease? Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;310:167-8.
  • 14
    Tavazzi G, Pellegrini C, Maurelli M, Belliato M, Sciutti F, Bottazzi A, et al. Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(5):911-5.
  • 15
    Deng Q, Hu B, Zhang Y, Yan J, Ping H, Zhou Q, et al. Suspected myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19: Evidence from front-line clinical observation in Wuhan, China. Int J Cardiol. 2020 July 15;311:116-21.
  • 16
    Tan W, Aboulhosn J. The cardiovascular burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a focus on congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;309:70-7.
  • 17
    Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Solomon SD, Vardeny O. Potential effects of coronaviruses on the cardiovascular system. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 27. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 18
    Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, McMurray JJ V, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 23382:1653-9.
  • Study Association
    This study is not associated with any thesis or dissertation.
  • Ethics approval and consent to participate
    This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
  • Sources of Funding
    There was no external funding source for this study.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    28 Aug 2020
  • Date of issue
    Aug 2020

History

  • Received
    28 Apr 2020
  • Reviewed
    22 May 2020
  • Accepted
    03 June 2020
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC Avenida Marechal Câmara, 160, sala: 330, Centro, CEP: 20020-907, (21) 3478-2700 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil, Fax: +55 21 3478-2770 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@cardiol.br