Social representation of animal-assisted activity in hospitals

Abstract

Pet visits to hospitals have become increasingly more frequent, and although its biopsychosocial benefits have been empirically and scientifically ascertained, this activity has risk-related limitations that should be properly addressed. This exploratory, quantitative and qualitative study sought to characterize the social representation of animal-assisted activity. Respondents selected from society in general (N=116), volunteers (N=15), staff members (N=16), and patients (N=16) who participate in animal interventions were receptive to the presence of animals, praising the benefits – especially the emotional – of the activity, and disregarding its limitations, mainly related to biosafety and animal well-being. Results show that the risks involved in the activity can be mitigated by the dialogical, multidisciplinary, deliberative and consultative nature of a bioethical approach aimed at assessing the costs, benefits and alternatives to ensure the well-being of all the actors involved.

Vulnerability analysis; Animals; Animal care committees; Ethics, institutional; Humanization of assistance