Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Conservation and ecological interactions of Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech (Fabaceae)

Conservação e interações ecológicas de Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech (Fabaceae)

ABSTRACT

Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech, an endemic plant species to Turkey, was investigated to provide an understanding the conservation status of this species and to fill the gap in the knowledge of habitat of this species. Field studies were carried out randomly by sampling 2 × 2 m sizes, 10 quadrats from each region. The number of individuals was estimated by calculating the average individual numbers in small quadrats and extrapolating this result for approximate population area. Reproductive success was evaluated using the mean number of seeds per fruit and the number of ovules per flower. A. bozakmanii prefers saltless soils whose pH values range from 7.48 and 8.33. The seed set was 45.8% of the ovules. In this study, we observed that the flowers of A. bozakmanii were visited by Oxythyrea cinctella to feed on their reproductive parts, thus rendering them infertile. Considering all these findings, the global and national conservation status for Astragalus bozakmanii was assessed as Endangered (EN) B1ab (i, ii, iii) + 2ab (i, ii, iii) according to the new IUCN Red List criteria. In conclusion, appropriate conservation actions need to be developed so that natural enemies of agricultural pests can re-enter their habitats.

Keywords:
conservation; IUCN; Turkey; endemic; Anatolian steppe

RESUMO

Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech, uma espécie de planta endêmica da Turquia, foi investigada para fornecer uma compreensão do estado de conservação dessa espécie e para preencher a lacuna no conhecimento do seu habitat. Os estudos de campo foram realizados de forma aleatória por amostragem de tamanhos de 2 × 2 m, 10 quadrados de cada região. O número de indivíduos foi estimado calculando os números médios individuais em pequenos quadrantes e extrapolando esse resultado para a área aproximada da população. O sucesso reprodutivo foi avaliado usando o número médio de sementes por fruto e o número de óvulos por flor. Astragalus bozakmanii prefere solos sem sal, cujos valores de pH variam de 7,48 a 8,33. A formação de sementes foi de 45,8% dos óvulos. Neste estudo, observamos que as flores de A. bozakmanii foram visitadas por Oxythyrea cinctella para se alimentar de suas partes reprodutivas, tornando-as inférteis. Considerando todas essas descobertas, o status de conservação global e nacional de Astragalus bozakmanii foi avaliado como Ameaçado (EN) B1ab (i, ii, iii) + 2ab (i, ii, iii) de acordo com os novos critérios da Lista Vermelha da IUCN. Em conclusão, ações de conservação adequadas precisam ser desenvolvidas para que os inimigos naturais das pragas agrícolas possam reentrar em seus habitats.

Palavras-chave:
endêmica; estepe da Anatólia; conservação; IUCN; Turquia

Introduction

Astragalus L. (Fabaceae), one of the largest genera of flowering plants on Earth, comprises almost 3,000 taxa and more than 250 sections (Podlech, 1986Podlech, D. 1986. Taxonomic and phytogeographical problems in Astragalus of the Old World and South-West Asia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 89: 37-43., Maassoumi, 1998Maassoumi, A.A. 1998. Astragalus in the Old World: check-list. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. Tehran, Iran., Podlech and Zarre, 2013Podlech, D. & Zarre, S. 2013. Taxonomic Revision of the Genus Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) in the Old World, Naturhistorischen Museum Wien, Vienna., Atasagun et al., 2018Atasagun, B., Aksoy, A. & Martin, E. 2018. Morphological, anatomical, palynological, karyological and ecological remarks of Astragalus argaeus (Fabaceae) endemic to Turkey. Phytotaxa 379 (1): 118-130.). Nearly 476 taxa 64 sections have been recorded with 203 endemic taxa and 51% endemism rate in Turkey known as the important endemism and gene diversity centre of the genus. (Chamberlain and Mathews 1970Chamberlain, D. & Mathews, M. 1970. Astragalus L. In: Davis P. (ed.). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. II. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh., Aytaç et al. 2012Aytaç, Z., Ekici, M. & Akan, H. 2012. Astragalus In: Güner A., Aslan S., Ekim T., Vural M., Babaç M., (eds). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanic Garden and Floristics Research Society. İstanbul. pp. 427-456., Karaman Erkul et al. 2014Karaman Erkul, S., Bagheri, A., Maassoumi, A.A. & Rahiminejad, M.R. 2014. Notes on Astragalus sect. Hymenostegis (Fabaceae) from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 39: 205-207., İlçim & Behçet 2016İlçim, A. & Behçet, L. 2016. Astragalus topalanense (Fabaceae), a new species from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 40: 74-80.). Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech was first collected in 1970 by Bozakman and K. Fitz on the Kızılcahaman-Çeltikçi road in Ankara province. It was known as an endemic species from Turkey, was published by Podlech (2001)Podlech, D. 2001. Contributions to the knowledge of the genus Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) VII-X. Sendtnera 7: 163-201. as a new species in the revision studies. A. bozakmanii is a perennial species that grows up to approximately 15 cm. Leaves are 15-20 cm long and petioles are 4-6 cm long. Leaflets are generally in 15 pairs (in first leaves usually in 10 pairs), elliptic and 10-13(-18) x 5-6(-8) mm. Racemes are loosely 15-20-flowered. Calyx is 12-13 mm long, tubular. Petals are glabrous, yellow, the standard slightly reddish-suffused (Podlech 2001Podlech, D. 2001. Contributions to the knowledge of the genus Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) VII-X. Sendtnera 7: 163-201.). Because of its limited distribution range and few known populations, it was considered as critically endangered; however, there is no information about exact number of individuals (Eker et al. 2015Eker, İ., Vural & M., Aslan, S. 2015. Ankara İli’nin Damarlı bitki çeşitliliği ve korumada öncelikli taksonları. Bağbahçe Bilim Dergisi 2: 57-114.). Further, there are a lot of incomplete information about habitat preference, environmental requirements, ecological thresholds, limiting its distribution, population size, and potential threats on A. bozakmanii populations. The objective of our research is to fill this gap. The main goals of our research are (1) to provide data about the habitat and population size of A. bozakmanii; (2) to determine the environmental drivers of the species distribution range; (3) to identify its major threats; and (4) to re-evaluate its conservation status at global scale.

Materials and methods

Data collection - The herbarium specimens of Astragalus bozakmanii were provided a single data source of its locality. [(Holotypus: Turkey, Prov. Ankara, Zwischen Kizilcahamam und Çeltikçi road, 6.6.1970, I. Bozakman and K. Fitz 906 (W).)] Field studies was carried out to verify the location of species stated in the literature and to discover new locations for determination of the distribution area between June and August 2018. Coordinates, population size (number of the individuals), elevation, habitat type (according to IUCN habitats classification scheme ver 3.1; IUCN 2012aIUCN. 2012a. Habitats classification scheme. Version 3.1. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/ha...
), and the threats (according to IUCN threats classification scheme ver 3.2; IUCN 2012bIUCN. 2012b. Threats classification scheme. Version 3.2. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/th...
) were recorded for all sites. The coordinates of the locality were taken by using a GPS (Global Positioning System) device in the field. Habitat types and major threats of each site were obtained from fieldworks. They were carried out randomly by sampling 2 x 2 m sizes and 10 quadrats from each region. The number of individuals was estimated by calculating the average individual numbers in small quadrats and then extrapolating this result for approximate population area. The closest climatic description of the area was provided by the Çamlıdere OGM meteorological station (Çamlıdere Forest Operation Directorate, Station No: 18075, https://www.mgm.gov.tr) which is a slightly higher altitude (1234 m), but also about ca 10 km to the northeast (40° 29.466’ E, 32° 28.536’ N).

Data analysis - The GeoCAT programme (Bachman & al., 2011Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill A.W., De La, Torre J. & Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: Geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117-126.; http: //geocat.kew.org/) was utilized for calculating the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) and the cell width was chosen as 2x2 km based on our observations. Area of Occupancy (AOO, km2), Extent of Occurrence (EOO, km2), population numbers and field observations were used to re-evaluate the conservation status of this species according to the IUCN (2012c)IUCN. 2012c. Conservation Actions Classification Scheme. Version 2.0. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/conservation-actions-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/co...
Categories and Criteria (ver 3.1). Soil samples were obtained from two randomly chosen places in the distribution area of the species. Samples were taken from 0-20 cm soil depth and the laboratory analyses were performed based on Walkley and Black (1934)Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29-38., Jackson (1958)Jackson, M. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Pentice Hall. Inc., Englewood cliffs, New Jersey., Richards (1954)Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline Alkali Soils. Department of Agriculture., Government Printing Office, Washington DC., and Allison and Moode (1965)Allison, L.E. & Moode. C.D. 1965. Carbonate. In: Black CA, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy Series. No. 9. Wisconsin..

The average seeds per fruit and ovules per flower were counted by evaluating the seed set. To determine fruit set, 100 flowers (randomly selected 20 individuals from each site) were randomly taken from A. bozakmanii population and labelled. All mature fruits were collected 45 days after anthesis. Following this, the mean seeds per fruit (n = total 100 fruits, randomly selected from all sites) was calculated. Seed set (%) was measured by the ratio of the number of seeds per fruit to the number of ovules per flower.

Pest determination observations were performed in 10 randomly assigned individuals for three days between the hours of 09:00-17:00, when the weather conditions were appropriate. Pests were collected from A. bozakmanii by hand and visual observation methods were used in the collection of samples. They were moved in a small dark glass bottle with 70% alcohol. In the laboratory, every sample were identified using a stereomicroscope.

Results and Discussion

Distribution, habitat, and environmental drivers - Astragalus bozakmanii was first collected in 1970 by I. Bozakman and K. Fitz on the Kızılcahaman-Çeltikçi road. It has been identified only from its holotype locality since 1970 (Podlech, 2001Podlech, D. 2001. Contributions to the knowledge of the genus Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) VII-X. Sendtnera 7: 163-201.) which was also confirmed by us. In this study, the species was established in four new sites (at Yahşihan, Yoncatepe, Bayındır, Elmalı villages) around Çamlıdere dam in Ankara in addition to the known locality (figure 2, table 1). The area of the new localities ranges between 0.33 and 3.331 km2 and the elevation varies between 965 and 1185 m. A. bozakmanii grows on the calcareous main mass (figure 1) and is mostly distributed in the steppe, degraded oak areas and abandoned fields.

The soils that the species grows on are characterized by alkaline soils, rich in organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Due to the fact that the Çamlıdere dam basin an important water resource in the region, is under protection, the species such as Quercus pubescens Willd., Crataegus monogyna Jacq., Prunus spinosa L. Scutelleria orientalis L., Astragalus vulnerariae DC., Ajuga salicifolia (L.) Schreb., Acanthus hirsutus Boiss., Sedum acre L. subsp. acre, Centaurea urvillei DC., Aethionema armenum Boiss, and Hedysarum varium Willd., which represent the natural vegetation of this region, had the opportunity to redevelop in the abandoned agricultural lands around the dam.

According to climatic data, the average annual temperature is 9.45 °C. Monthly average maximum temperature reaches 20.5 °C in July. The average minimum temperature reaches-1.9 °C in January. Extreme temperatures records are-14.26 °C in January and 33.32 °C in July. The highest and lowest precipitation is 65.2 and 6.9 mm in June and July, respectively. The highest and lowest amount of humidity is 86.2 and 52.2 mm in January and September, respectively. The first flower buds of Astragalus bozakmanii were observed after the second week of May and the flowering period began in May and continued until mid-July. Fruits that began to mature by the end of June could be observed until the end of August (table 2).

Astragalus bozakmanii prefers saltless soils with the pH between 7.85 and 8.06 (slightly alkaline) and clayey with 1.57-23.65% lime. The soils in which A. bozakmanii grows include poor organic matter content (1.03-1.39 %), nitrogen (0.05-0.07 %), and phosphorus (1.71- 2.62 %). In additionally, the soil was also rich in CaCO3 and potassium (table 3).

Seed set - In A. bozakmanii, seed production in individuals exposed to pollinator visits under natural conditions, the average number of seeds per fruit was calculated as 4.58 ± 2.21, and the number of ovules per flower was 10. The seed set was 45.8 % of the ovules. The mean number of seeds per legume was reported as 11.8 in populations of Astragalus gines-lopezii Talavera & al. (Martínez-Fernández et al., 2014Martínez-Fernández, V., Martínez-García, F. & Pérez-García, F. 2014. Census, reproductive biology, and germination of Astragalus gines-lopezii (Fabaceae), a narrow and endangered endemic species of SW Spain. Turkish Journal of Botany 38: 686-695.). Results from this study have not so high if it is compared with data of A. bozakmanii.

Figure 1
Characters of Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech. a. General appearances of flower. b. Legume. c. Habit. d. Habitat.
Figure 2
Distribution of Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech (Çamlıdere, Ankara, Turkey).
Table 1
The four sites where Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech located, with altitude range, identified threats (IUCN 2012aIUCN. 2012a. Habitats classification scheme. Version 3.1. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/ha...
), and habitats classification scheme coded (IUCN 2012bIUCN. 2012b. Threats classification scheme. Version 3.2. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/th...
).
Table 2
Phenology stages of Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech.
Table 3
Soil characteristics in natural habitats of Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech.

Conservation status - The current total estimated population size was calculated here to be 50.957 individuals: 32.835 in Yahşihan, 9.600 in Yoncatepe, 6.832 in the Bayındır, and 1.690 in Elmalı, and estimated population size of each site ranged between 1690 and 32985 individuals. Based on the extent of occurrence (38.105 km2), area of occupancy (20 km2), number of locations (IUCN, 2019IUCN. 2019. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available in https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedListGuidelines.pdf (access in 13-II-2020).
https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedList...
), and decline of the original population due to habitat loss, we assessed the species as Endangered (EN) status and B1ab (i, ii, iii) + 2ab (i, ii, iii) in the IUCN Red List of theratened categories and criteria.

Piezodorus lituratus (F.), an insect pest classified under Pentatomidae (Heteroptera), was observed in most of the mature legume pericarps of A. bozakmanii. Additionlly, the beetle species Oxythyrea cinctella (S.), usually feeds on flowers of the host plant, is distributed in South Caucasus, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Middle Asia and Caucasus (Hurpin, 1962Hurpin, B. 1962. Super-Famille des Scarabaeoidea. In: Balachowsky AS, (ed). Entomologie Appliquee A L‘Agriculture., Tome I. Masson et Cie, France.; Smetana, 2006Smetana, A. 2006. Subfamily Cetoniinae. In: I, Lobl., A, Smetana, editors. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol. III. Apollo Books. Denmark.). It was observed that this insect species caused significant damage to mature fruit and seeds of A. bozakmanii (figure 3). Piezodorus lituratus (F.), also known as Gorse Shield Bug (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), is a widespread insect in many parts of Europe, and feeds on several plants, especially flowers and fruits of many Fabaceae family members (Schaefer and Panizzi 2000Schaefer, C.W. & Panizzi, A.R. 2000. Economic importance of Heteroptera: a general view. In: Schaefer C.W., Panizzi A.R (eds.). Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press Boca Raton, USA.) (figure 3). Some researchers noted in their studies that adult beetles cause local damage to bud of ornamental plants such as Rosa L., Prunus L., Cydonia L., Papaver L., Vitis L., different cereals as well as other deciduous fruit trees (apricot, citrus, almond, apple, and etc.; Özturk et al., 2004Özturk, N., Ulusoy, M.R., Erkilic, L. & Bayhan, S. 2004. Pests and predatory species determined in apricot orchards in Malatya province of Turkey. Bitki Koruma Bulteni. 44: 1-13., Hurpin, 1962Hurpin, B. 1962. Super-Famille des Scarabaeoidea. In: Balachowsky AS, (ed). Entomologie Appliquee A L‘Agriculture., Tome I. Masson et Cie, France.). Similar to other members of Cetoniinae, the scarab beetles can also damage the reproductive parts of flowers, and thus make them infertile (Hurpin, 1962Hurpin, B. 1962. Super-Famille des Scarabaeoidea. In: Balachowsky AS, (ed). Entomologie Appliquee A L‘Agriculture., Tome I. Masson et Cie, France.; Homonnay and Homonnayne-Csehi, 1990Homonnay, F. & Homonnayne-Csehi, E. 1990. Melolonthidae. In: Jermy T, Balazs K, (eds.). Handbook of Plant Protection Zoology 3/A., Akademiai Press, Hungary.; Alford, 1991Alford, D.V. 1991. A Colour Atlas of Pests of Ornamental Trees, Shrubs and Flowers, Wolfe Publishing Ltd, London.). In accordance with these studies, we observed that the flowers of A. bozakmanii were visited by Oxythyrea cinctella (S.) to feed on their reproductive parts, thus rendering them infertile (figure 3).

The main threats of the entire population of A. bozakmanii were habitat fragmentation and habitat loss due to degraded/abandoned areas after agricultural activities and roads opened for access to agricultural lands and infrastructure expansion. The individuals of A. bozakmanii were frequently encountered in the roadside and/or field edge habitats formed as a result of the anthropogenic influences. Although there were some differences between the observed threats on the localities, the most prominent threat was the altered habitat composition with agricultural activities. Agricultural expansion induces to significant habitat loss and fragmentation of natural and semi-natural habitats, which ultimately causes the loss of natural enemies of agricultural pests (Zhao et al., 2015Zhao, Z.H., Hui, C., He, D.H. & Li, B.L. 2015. Effects of agricultural intensification on ability of natural enemies to control aphids. Scientific Reports 5: 8024.; Schellhorn et al., 2015Schellhorn, N.A., Gagic, V. & Bommarco, R. 2015. Time will tell: resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30: 524-530.) and declines in biodiversity (Bianchi et al., 2006Bianchi, F.J.J.A., Booij, C.J.H. & Tscharntke, T. 2006. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 1715-1727.; Tscharntke et al., 2007Tscharntke, T., Bommarco, R., Clough, Y., Crist, T.O., Kleijn, D., Rand, T.A., Tylianakis, J.M., Van Nouhuys, S. & Vidal, S. 2007. Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale. Biological Control 43: 294-309.). Decreasing plant diversity leads to changes in the community composition of the pest complex-herbivorous insects and their natural enemies (predators and parasites) (Power and Flecker, 1996Power, A. & Flecker, A.S. 1996. The role of biodiversity in tropical managedecosystems. In: Ori-ans G.H., Dirzo R., Cushman J.H. (eds.). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in Tropical Forests. Springer-Verlag, New York.). Increasing agricultural pests leads to decrease in plant population size. Consequently, serious problems were observed in the reproductive biology of A. bozakmanii due to the decrease in the natural enemies of agricultural pests; however, further research to reveal interaction between this plant species and its pests are needed.

Figure 3
Pests observed on reproductive organs of Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech. a. Piezodorus lituratus (Fabricius, 1794). b. Oxythyrea cinctella Poda.

Conclusions

Area of occupancy and extent of occurrence for the threatened plant taxa were calculated as 38.105 km2 and 20 km2, respectively. According to IUCN (2019)IUCN. 2019. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available in https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedListGuidelines.pdf (access in 13-II-2020).
https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedList...
, the current status of the species can be evaluated as EN (Endangered) based on the B criterium in terms of EOO value <5000 km2 (38105 km2) B1b (i, ii), AOO (area of occupancy) value <10 km2 (20 km2) B2b (i, ii). However, the section 4.11 in the IUCN Guidelines (IUCN, 2019IUCN. 2019. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available in https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedListGuidelines.pdf (access in 13-II-2020).
https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedList...
) describe the term ‘location’ as a geographically or ecologically distinct area in which a single threatening event can rapidly affect all individuals of the taxon present. All subpopulations of the taxon were admitted as a single location owing to the existence of a sole main threat in the habitats (Condition (a) under Criterion B1 and B2). In addition, the continuous decrease of the area, extent, and quality of the habitat fulfils the requirement (iii) under Criterion B1b and B2b. As a result of all these assessments, we assessed the Endangered (EN) global conservation status for Astragalus bozakmanii, according to the new IUCN Red List criteria (IUCN, 2019IUCN. 2019. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available in https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedListGuidelines.pdf (access in 13-II-2020).
https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedList...
), B1ab (i, ii, iii) + 2ab (i, ii, iii).

The IUCN Red List recommends important conservation precautions and studies for Astragalus bozakmanii (table 4). Developing a long-term conservation action of A. bozakmanii is primarily necessary to study its population genetics. As this type of research requires long term studies. Thus, we suggest an integrated conservation plan for A. bozakmanii including both in-situ and ex-situ conservation to prevent the depletion of the present gene pool. In addition, the change of microclimate due to Çamlıdere dam on a local scale should be considered and appropriate protection actions need to be developed so that natural enemies of agricultural pests can re-enter their habitats. We propose that the cooperation between research institutes and local government should be to carried out in the same area every year for the restoration of natural processes of Astragalus bozakmanii habitat and for the long-range observation of the population and habitat trend.

Table 4
Conservation actions needed and research needed proposed and carried out, for Astragalus bozakmanii Podlech. Conservation actions coded following IUCN (2012c)IUCN. 2012c. Conservation Actions Classification Scheme. Version 2.0. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/conservation-actions-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/co...
and research needed are IUCN (2012d)IUCN. 2012d. Research Needed Classification Scheme. Version 2.0. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/research-needed-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/re...
.

Acknowledgement

We thank Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Nature Conservation National Parks, for financial support. We offer our thanks to Prof. Dr. Mecit Vural, for all the help and the scientific support.

Notes on contributors

Ümit Subaşı: all stages of this article, fieldwork, control of herbarium collections (Herbarium of Ankara University - ANK) and literature, evaluation of the conservation status, article writing phase.

Literature cited

  • Alford, D.V. 1991. A Colour Atlas of Pests of Ornamental Trees, Shrubs and Flowers, Wolfe Publishing Ltd, London.
  • Allison, L.E. & Moode. C.D. 1965. Carbonate. In: Black CA, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy Series. No. 9. Wisconsin.
  • Atasagun, B., Aksoy, A. & Martin, E. 2018. Morphological, anatomical, palynological, karyological and ecological remarks of Astragalus argaeus (Fabaceae) endemic to Turkey. Phytotaxa 379 (1): 118-130.
  • Aytaç, Z., Ekici, M. & Akan, H. 2012. Astragalus In: Güner A., Aslan S., Ekim T., Vural M., Babaç M., (eds). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanic Garden and Floristics Research Society. İstanbul. pp. 427-456.
  • Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill A.W., De La, Torre J. & Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: Geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
  • Bianchi, F.J.J.A., Booij, C.J.H. & Tscharntke, T. 2006. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 1715-1727.
  • Chamberlain, D. & Mathews, M. 1970. Astragalus L. In: Davis P. (ed.). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. II. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
  • Davis, P.H. 1965-1985. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands vol. 1-9. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
  • Eker, İ., Vural & M., Aslan, S. 2015. Ankara İli’nin Damarlı bitki çeşitliliği ve korumada öncelikli taksonları. Bağbahçe Bilim Dergisi 2: 57-114.
  • Homonnay, F. & Homonnayne-Csehi, E. 1990. Melolonthidae. In: Jermy T, Balazs K, (eds.). Handbook of Plant Protection Zoology 3/A., Akademiai Press, Hungary.
  • Hurpin, B. 1962. Super-Famille des Scarabaeoidea. In: Balachowsky AS, (ed). Entomologie Appliquee A L‘Agriculture., Tome I. Masson et Cie, France.
  • IUCN. 2019. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available in https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedListGuidelines.pdf (access in 13-II-2020).
    » https://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedListGuidelines.pdf
  • IUCN. 2012a. Habitats classification scheme. Version 3.1. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
    » https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme
  • IUCN. 2012b. Threats classification scheme. Version 3.2. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
    » https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme
  • IUCN. 2012c. Conservation Actions Classification Scheme. Version 2.0. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/conservation-actions-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
    » https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/conservation-actions-classification-scheme
  • IUCN. 2012d. Research Needed Classification Scheme. Version 2.0. Available in https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/research-needed-classification-scheme (access in 13-II-2020).
    » https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/research-needed-classification-scheme
  • İlçim, A. & Behçet, L. 2016. Astragalus topalanense (Fabaceae), a new species from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 40: 74-80.
  • Jackson, M. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Pentice Hall. Inc., Englewood cliffs, New Jersey.
  • Karaman Erkul, S., Bagheri, A., Maassoumi, A.A. & Rahiminejad, M.R. 2014. Notes on Astragalus sect. Hymenostegis (Fabaceae) from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 39: 205-207.
  • Maassoumi, A.A. 1998. Astragalus in the Old World: check-list. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. Tehran, Iran.
  • Martínez-Fernández, V., Martínez-García, F. & Pérez-García, F. 2014. Census, reproductive biology, and germination of Astragalus gines-lopezii (Fabaceae), a narrow and endangered endemic species of SW Spain. Turkish Journal of Botany 38: 686-695.
  • Özturk, N., Ulusoy, M.R., Erkilic, L. & Bayhan, S. 2004. Pests and predatory species determined in apricot orchards in Malatya province of Turkey. Bitki Koruma Bulteni. 44: 1-13.
  • Podlech, D. 2001. Contributions to the knowledge of the genus Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) VII-X. Sendtnera 7: 163-201.
  • Podlech, D. & Zarre, S. 2013. Taxonomic Revision of the Genus Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) in the Old World, Naturhistorischen Museum Wien, Vienna.
  • Podlech, D. 1986. Taxonomic and phytogeographical problems in Astragalus of the Old World and South-West Asia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 89: 37-43.
  • Power, A. & Flecker, A.S. 1996. The role of biodiversity in tropical managedecosystems. In: Ori-ans G.H., Dirzo R., Cushman J.H. (eds.). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in Tropical Forests. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline Alkali Soils. Department of Agriculture., Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
  • Schaefer, C.W. & Panizzi, A.R. 2000. Economic importance of Heteroptera: a general view. In: Schaefer C.W., Panizzi A.R (eds.). Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press Boca Raton, USA.
  • Schellhorn, N.A., Gagic, V. & Bommarco, R. 2015. Time will tell: resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30: 524-530.
  • Smetana, A. 2006. Subfamily Cetoniinae. In: I, Lobl., A, Smetana, editors. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol. III. Apollo Books. Denmark.
  • Tscharntke, T., Bommarco, R., Clough, Y., Crist, T.O., Kleijn, D., Rand, T.A., Tylianakis, J.M., Van Nouhuys, S. & Vidal, S. 2007. Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale. Biological Control 43: 294-309.
  • Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29-38.
  • Zhao, Z.H., Hui, C., He, D.H. & Li, B.L. 2015. Effects of agricultural intensification on ability of natural enemies to control aphids. Scientific Reports 5: 8024.

Edited by

Associate Editor: Natália Macedo Ivanauskas

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    17 Dec 2021
  • Date of issue
    2021

History

  • Received
    16 Dec 2020
  • Accepted
    27 Aug 2021
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais Av. Miguel Stefano, 3687 , 04301-902 São Paulo – SP / Brasil, Tel.: 55 11 5067-6057, Fax; 55 11 5073-3678 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: hoehneaibt@gmail.com