Imaging

UROLOGICAL SURVEY

Imaging

Segmental enhancement inversion at biphasic multidetector CT: characteristic finding of small renal oncocytoma

Kim JI, Cho JY, Moon KC, Lee HJ, Kim SH

Department of Radiology, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Chongno-gu, Seoul, Korea

Radiology. 2009; 252: 441-8

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the usefulness of segmental enhancement inversion during the corticomedullary phase (CMP) and early excretory phase (EEP) of biphasic multidetector computed tomography (CT) in differentiating small renal oncocytoma from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATHERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was institutional review board approved; informed consent was waived. Between January 2004 and December 2006, 98 patients with pathologically confirmed renal masses smaller than 4 cm (10 renal oncocytomas and 88 RCCs) were included in this study. Segmental enhancement inversion was defined as follows: In a mass with two segments showing different degrees of enhancement during CMP, the relatively highly enhanced segment became less enhanced during EEP, whereas the less-enhanced segment during CMP became highly enhanced during EEP. Two experienced radiologists retrospectively assessed the presence of segmental inversion in all masses and measured attenuation with consensus. The Fisher exact test was used to determine the significance of segmental enhancement inversion in differentiating small renal oncocytoma from RCC.

RESULTS: Eight of 10 renal oncocytomas and only one of 88 RCCs showed segmental inversion during CMP and EEP, which significantly differentiated small renal oncocytomas and RCCs (P < .0001). For differentiating oncocytoma from RCC, segmental inversion was found to have a sensitivity of 80% (eight of 10), a specificity of 99% (87 of 88), a positive predictive value of 89% (eight of nine), and a negative predictive value of 98% (87 of 89). The mean values of the attenuation differences shown by two segments during CMP and EEP were 62.75 HU +/- 36.96 (standard deviation) and -36.88 HU +/- 20.02, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Segmental enhancement inversion during CMP and EEP was found to be a characteristic enhancement pattern of small renal oncocytoma at biphasic multidetector CT and it may help in differentiating small oncocytoma from RCC.

Editorial Comment

The authors described an interesting imaging feature that might be useful as an adjunct finding for adequate characterization of small oncocytomas. Small oncocytomas are usually homogeneously hyperdense solid lesion on unenhanced phase, presenting moderate to high contrast enhancement. These features however are not specific since can also be found in cromophobic renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma without macroscopic fat. The authors showed that the presence of segmental enhancement inversion within a small renal mass has a specificity of 99% and a sensitivity of 80% for adequate characterization of oncocytoma. In their protocol however, all patients were submitted to three-phasic multidetector CT examination: unenhanced, cortico-medullary (30-40”) and excretory (120-180”). As we know to optimize detection and characterization, renal masses are best examined during nephrographic phase that occurs 80-100” after intravenous injection of contrast. It is obvious that one could simply add the nephrographic phase to the proposed protocol. However, adding an extra phase must be a matter of concern since we will be increasing 4 to 5 mSv to the total amount of effective dose of irradiation to the patient. Perhaps it would be advisable to obtain additional CMP only in patients in whom unenhanced scans showed the presence of a small homogeneously hyperdense renal mass. Further studies with multiphasic CT are warranted to confirm these findings. In our institution after knowledge of this publication, a dedicated protocol with multiphasic contrast enhanced MRI, was initiated with the purpose to confirm these findings using a method without radiation risk.

Dr. Adilson Prando

Chief, Department of Radiology and

Diagnostic Imaging, Vera Cruz Hospital

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

E-mail: [e-mail]

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  18 Jan 2010
• Date of issue
  Dec 2009