Thermoanalytical and solution stability studies of hexamethylenedithiocarbamates

ARTICLE

Thermoanalytical and solution stability studies of hexamethylenedithiocarbamates

Valéria D. Benedini^I; Patrícia A. Antunes^II; Éder T. G. Cavalheiro^{*, I}; Gilberto O. Chierice^I

^IInstituto de Química de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 780, 13560-970 São Carlos-SP, Brazil

^IIUniversidade do Oeste Paulista, Rua José Bongiovani, 700, 19050-680 Presidente Prudente-SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetric investigation of the thermal behavior of nickel(II), copper(II), zinc(II) and cadmium(II) hexamethylenedithiocarbamates were performed under nitrogen and air atmospheres in order to investigate the steps and products of thermal decomposition. When obtained in a crystalline form, the decomposition products were identified by their X-ray diffraction patterns. Metal sulfides and oxides were the major residues under nitrogen and air atmospheres, respectively. Spectrophotometric measurements in the ultraviolet region were used to estimate the pK_a = 3.6 ± 0.2 for the haxamethylenedithiocarbamic acid at 0.50 mol dm^-3 ionic strength (KCl) at 25.0 °C and the kinetic parameters of decomposition at different pH values (k_lim = 2.21 x 10^-2 s^-1 and t_{½ lim} = 156 s).

Keywords: hexamethylenedithiocarbamate, thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, decomposition rate constant

RESUMO

Estudos termogravimétricos e calorimétricos exploratórios diferenciais de hexametilenoditiocarbamatos de níquel(II), cobre(II), zinco(II) e cádmio(II) foram realizados sob atmosferas dinâmicas de ar e nitrogênio, para avaliar as etapas e os produtos de decomposição térmica. Esses produtos, quando cristalinos, foram caracterizados por difratometria de raios X, sendo predominantemente constituídos por sulfetos e óxidos metálicos sob N₂ e ar, respectivamente. Usando espectrofotometria na região do ultravioleta, também foram determinados o pK_a = 3,6 ± 0,2 para o ácido hexametilenoditiocarbâmico em força iônica igual a 0,50 mol dm^-3 (KCl) a 25,0 °C e os parâmetros cinéticos de decomposição em diferentes valores de pH (k_lim = 2,21 x 10^-2 s^-1 e t_{½ lim} = 156 s).

Introduction

Dithiocarbamates (DTC) are products of the reaction between a primary or secondary amine and carbon dissulfide in basic media. Their versatility and applicability was discussed by Kitson.¹ The interest in the solution stability of dithiocarbamates has been renewed by the utilization of such compounds as coadjutants in the treatment of AIDS,^2,3 but they have also been suggested for tuberculosis⁴ and cancer⁵ treatment in the past. These applications demand enough chemical stability for an effective action in the biological medium.

The applications of this class of compounds are not limited to medicine and their use in agriculture, industry, analytical and organic chemistry, as well as their physicochemical properties, are summarized in several review articles.^6-15 From these works it is known that dithiocarbamates obtained from cyclic amines are more stable than the aliphatic derivatives.

The stability of dithiocarbamates in solution is strongly dependent on the pH, as discussed by several authors.^16-22 However, it was the work of Chakrabarti and co-workers^19-22 that led to the proposition of a decomposition intermediate whose stability is related to the presence of a water molecule in its structure.

Considering that the decomposition of dithiocarbamates is very fast in acidic media, a spectrophotometric method based on diode-array measurements has been proposed²³ in order to reach a more accurate determination of the pK_a of dithiocarbamic acids. A correlation between the infrared spectroscopy data of the coordination nature of cyclic DTC complexes and its effect on the thermal decomposition of such compounds has also been presented.^24,25

Hexamethylenedithiocarbamate (hex) is a cyclic DTC derived from hexamethyleneimine (homopiperidine), a seven member heterocyclic amine, whose structure is represented in Figure 1.

Among many other applications, hex complexes have widely been used in the determination of several metals using different strategies and techniques for pre-concentration. Examples of such applications, presented during the last 35 years, include the recent description of the profitable use of Co(hex)₃,^26-33 Fe(hex)₃^33-37 and its mixtures with Fe₂O₃•xH₂O^38-42 and Pb(hex)₂^43-46 as a colloidal precipitate collector in the flotation preconcentration of Cd, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, Zn, Tl, Cr and Mn, allowing determinations at the ng dm^-3 range in several water samples.

These complexes have also been used to pre-concentrate metal ions in columns. After this step, the complexes are eluted and inserted in HPLC systems, allowing separations and simultaneous quantifications.^47-52 They have also been employed in separation and co-precipitation^53-60 and in the less recent applications with solid^61-64 and liquid phase extractions^65-75 followed by determination by atomic spectroscopic techniques of several elements.

Studies regarding the standard enthalpy of formation of hexamethyleneaminium hexamethylenedithiocarbamate,⁷⁶ dye-sensitized photolysis^77-79 and crystal structures of ligand and complexes^80,81 can also be found.

Thermal analysis of mixed-ligand nickel hexamethylenedithiocarbamate complexes with triphenyl and tributylphosphine,⁸² as well as of lanthanide complexes with hexamethylenedithiocarbamate,^83,84 have been described. Recently, the thermal behavior of the ammonium and hexamethyleneaminium salts of hexamethylenedithiocarbamate was also reported.⁸⁵

The solution stability of the hexamethylenedithiocarbamate proved to be important in medical applications. A representative example is the patent presented by the French Roussel-Uclaf company⁸⁶ regarding the use of this DTC as a protector of hepatic cells. The compound is taken orally or by a bloodshot as an alkaline cation salt solution. In addition, the thermal behavior is another important feature in industrial and agricultural application of this dithiocarbamate, as related to thermal stability and residues generated during thermal decomposition.⁷

Despite the importance of the solution and thermal stability for hex applications, few studies regarding these issues have been reported. In the present work, the pK_a value of the hexamethylenedithiocarbamic acid (Hhex) was determined in ionic strength I = 0.50 mol dm^-3 by spectrophotometry in the ultraviolet region, and used to estimate the decomposition rate of hexamethylenedithiocarbamate (hex) at different pH values using a method based on diode-array measurements of the absorbance.²³ Additionally, the thermal behavior of M(hex)₂ (M = nickel(II), copper(II), zinc(II) and cadmium(II)) solid state complexes was evaluated, as these compounds are important examples of hex complexes with industrial and agricultural applications.

Experimental

All reagents were of analytical grade and used without further purification. The water employed in all experiments was deionized before use.

Hexamethyleneaminium-hexamethylenedithiocarbamate (HMA-hex) - synthesis and characterization

The HMA-hex salt was obtained by dissolving 0.4 mol of hexamethyleneimine in 50 dm³ of ethanol/water 1:1 (v/v) in an erlenmeyer. The mixture was kept in an ice bath and protected from the light. Nitrogen was bubbled into the solution for 5 min and then 0.2 mol of carbon disulfide was slowly added to the reaction mixture. The white solid thus obtained was filtered, washed with cold ethanol and then dissolved in a minimum amount of ethanol/water 1:1 (v/v) at 35 °C, protected from the light. The solution was frozen and the white needle-like crystals were dried in a vacuum oven at 35 °C for 8 h and characterized as:

Hexamethylenedithiocarbamate complexes - synthesis and characterization

The metal complexes were obtained by direct reaction of the HMA-hex solution and CdCl₂•2H₂O, CuCl₂•H₂O, NiCl₂•6H₂O and ZnCl₂ solutions in a glove bag (Cole-Parmer, USA) under N₂. The resulting precipitates, with characteristic colors, were filtered off, washed with water and then with ethanol. They were finally dried in a vacuum oven at 35 °C for 8 h and characterized as:

Buffer solutions

The McIlvaine buffer solutions with ionic strength adjusted to 0.50 mol dm^-3 (KCl) were prepared according to the procedure described by Elving et al.⁸⁷ The pH values of these buffers were accurately measured with a glass electrode previously calibrated with KCl solutions of ionic strength 0.50 mol dm^-3 and hydrogen ion concentration 1.00 x 10^-2 and 1.00 x 10^-4 mol dm^-3 (HClO₄), corresponding to pH 2.00 and 4.00, respectively.⁸⁸

Equipment

The characterization of the complexes was performed by IR vibrational spectroscopy (KBr pellets) in a Nicolet 5SXC spectrophotometer. Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy was carried out in a Hitachi Z-8100 spectrophotometer and C, N, H contents were determined by elemental analysis using a Fisons EA 1108 CNHS-O instrument.

Thermogravimetric (TG) curves were recorded in a DuPont 9900 thermoanalyser coupled with a TGA 951 Thermogravimetric Module, under a gas flow of 90 dm³ min^-1 (N₂ or air) in a platinum crucible. A heating rate of 10 °C min^-1 and samples of about 7 mg at atmospheric pressure were employed. The differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) curves were recorded in a DuPont 9900 thermoanalyser coupled with a DSC 910 Calorimetric Module under a gas flow of 90 dm³ min^-1 (N₂ or air), in covered aluminum pans with a central pin hole, at a heating rate of 10 °C min^-1 and using samples of about 5 mg at atmospheric pressure. The cell was previously calibrated for temperature and energy (DH) using indium metal (99.9+%) as standard.

Intermediates of the thermal decomposition process were generated in an oven at the same temperature and atmosphere in which they appeared in the TG curves. After 15 min of heating, they were cooled down and kept in a desiccator under vacuum. The X-ray patterns of the crystalline residues were recorded in a VEB-Karl Zeiss Jena URD6 diffractometer. The results were compared with standard data from the International Centre for Diffraction Data.⁸⁹

A diode-array Hewlett-Packard HP 8451A spectrophotometer and quartz cells, 1.00 cm path length, were used in the spectrophotometric measurements. The pH values were measured with a Corning IA 250 coupled to a Metrohm EA 121 combined glass electrode.

Procedure for pK_a determination

The spectrophotometric method used for pK_a determination was described earlier.^23,90 All the spectrophotometric measurements were carried at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C, using the buffered solution as a blank. Stock HMA-hex solutions (1.0 x 10^-2 mol dm^-3) were used in the preparation of working solutions, with concentrations ranging from 3.34 x 10^-5 to 1.67 x 10^-6 mol dm^-3 in pH 2.13 and 8.40. A 1.0 x 10^-4 mol dm^-3 HMA-hex solution was used in the determination of the maximum absorption wavelength of the acidic and basic forms, in pH ranging from 2.78 to 4.10. In order to minimize the decomposition of the compounds, the solutions were prepared directly in the cells, by adding an appropriate volume of the stock solution of HMA-hex to the buffer solution and reaching a final volume of 3.00 dm³.

Results and Discussion

The products are listed in Table 1 and the formulae given are in agreement with elemental analyses and thermogravimetric data. The hex structure is presented in Figure 1. All complexes are anhydrous. The split IR absorption band around 1000 cm^-1 indicated that the ligand presents a monodentate behavior in Cd(hex)₂ and Zn(hex)₂, while a single absorption band in this region suggests a bidentate behavior in Ni(hex)₂ and Cu(hex)₂, according to Sharma⁷ and Nakamoto.⁹¹ This is in total agreement with our previous findings for other cyclic DTC complexes with the same metal cations.^24,25,90

The characteristic C–N stretching vibrational mode is observed at 1474-1503 cm^-1 and is less intense than that observed for alkyl DTC derivatives due to the low double bond character caused by the rigid ring system.⁹²

pK_a determination

The use of diode array data for pK_a determination is convenient, since the decomposition of DTC is very fast in acidic media.^19-23 The decomposition rate depends on the amine substituents. The procedure considers that the total absorbance at a given wavelength is due to the sum of the absorbances of the protonated (Hhex) and free (hex) forms of the DTC:

in which A_A and A_B are the absorbances in the wavelengths A and B, respectively, e_A,Hhex and e_A,hex are the molar absorptivities of the protonated and free forms in the wavelength A, and [Hhex] and [hex] are the concentrations of the protonated and free forms, respectively. The absorptivity coefficients can be obtained from the slopes of A versus [hex] plots, at the maximum wavelengths, in acidic and basic media. On solving equations (1) and (2), it is possible to determine the [hex]/[Hhex] ratio. Then, measuring the absorbances at different pH values, the pK_a can be determined by the Henderson-Hasselbach equation:

The maximum absorption wavelength of the protonated (Hhex) form was observed at 276 nm. The free form presented two maxima at 260 and 283 nm. For best resolution, 260 nm (basic, e = 1.22 x 10⁴ cm^-1 mol dm^-3) and 276 nm (acidic, e = 1.06 x 10⁴ cm^-1 mol dm^-3) were used in the pK_a determination. The results are summarized in Table 2 and a pK_a value of 3.6±0.2 was obtained. Values of pK_a around 3.29 were previously reported using a conventional spectrophotometric²¹ method at 25 °C and a 0.01 mol dm^-3 ionic strength.

An evaluation of these differences can be performed considering the changes in spectral shape when the pH is changed from 2.8 to 4.1 (Figure 2). According to Vandebeek et al.,²¹ the acidic form of a DTC presents only one peak in the UV region, while the basic form presents two peaks. Figure 2 shows that from pH 3.9 two peaks are clearly observed, evidencing the presence of a significant amount of the basic form. At pH 2.8 only one peak is observed, suggesting the presence of a significant amount of the acidic form.

The results also suggest the following order of acidity for cyclic dithiocarbamate derivatives such as pyrrolidine (pyr), piperidine (pip), morpholine (mor) and hexamethylenedithiocarbamates (hex) (in brackets the pK_a value and the reference in which it appears):

Hpyr (3.14)²³ > Hpip (3.51)²³» Hmor (3.56)⁹⁰» Hhex (3.6)^{this work}

Decomposition kinetics

The decomposition of HMA-hex was followed by the absorbance decay of the 286 nm peak at different pH values. The lnA/A₀versus time plots showed a linear dependence, suggesting a pseudo-first order kinetics with slope equal to k_ap.

Chakrabarty and co-workers^19-22 investigated the decomposition of dithiocarbamates. According to these authors, the rate of decomposition in basic media is dependent on the pH ([H⁺]<<K_a), but in sufficiently acidic solutions ([H⁺]>>K_a) it becomes constant (k_ap» k_lim), according to:

in which k_ap is the apparent rate constant from the ln A/A₀versus time plots, k_lim is the limiting rate constant at low pH and K_a is the acidic dissociation constant.

The results obtained for hex are presented in Table 3. These data led us to conclude that hex presents an intermediate stability between the analogous piperidinedithiocarbamate, pip (t_½lim = 10 s) and the 5 membered ring pyrrolidine derivative, pyr (t_½lim = 1620 s).²³ Chakrabati and co-workers^20,21 attributed this difference to the ability of pyr and hex to interact with a water molecule in the decomposition intermediate, due to the configuration of the 5 and 7 membered rings.

The low stability of the anion in acidic medium can explain the large deviations between the measurements in Table 3.

Thermal decomposition of solid state complexes

Thermal processes, residues formed, mass losses and temperature ranges observed in each step of the TG/DTG and DSC curves are given in Table 4 under nitrogen and Table 5 under air dynamic atmospheres. Crystalline intermediates were characterized by X-ray diffraction patterns and results were compared with literature data.⁸⁹ TG/DTG and DSC curves are presented in Figure 3 under N₂ and in Figure 4 in air. DSC curves are limited to 600 °C because aluminum pans were used.

As described earlier,⁸⁵ the HMA-hex salt showed melting followed by complete volatilization between 110-163 and 90-170 °C under nitrogen and air dynamic atmospheres respectively (curves not presented). The IR spectra of the HMA-hex salt and of the condensed product confirmed the volatilization phenomena.

Crystalline changes were detected for the copper and the zinc complexes, represented by endothermic peaks in the DSC curves in both atmospheres. Melting points were checked by the use of a capillary tube immerse in a glycerin bath, in order to differentiate them from the crystalline changes. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed in order to characterize the crystalline residues, when available; otherwise the nature of the residues has been assigned by stoichiometric calculations. The results are presented in Table 6 and are compared with literature data.⁸⁹ The thermal behavior of the complexes is discussed below.

Thermal decomposition under nitrogen

Thermoanalytical curves are presented in Figure 3. According to TG/DTG and DSC data, there is no evidence for the presence of hydration water in the solids. Melting was observed for Cu(hex)₂, Cd(hex)₂, Ni(hex)₂ and Zn(hex)₂, and it was confirmed in a capillary glass tube test. Zn(hex)₂ and Cu(hex)₂ apparently melted after a crystalline transition, as suggested by the peak shape and the absence of mass loss associated with the process. XRD measurements were not performed before and after the peak in order to confirm these physical changes.

Sulfides were the main residues around 400 °C, after the decomposition of the complexes. Metallic Cd, Cu and Zn were found in the further decomposition steps of the inorganic residue, while NiS remained stable as the final decomposition product in the temperature range investigated.

Only in the Cu(hex)₂ case, Cu(SCN)₂ was detected as the intermediate in decomposition, as suggested by Sharma.⁷ This is in agreement with previous findings for other cyclic dithiocarbamate derivatives.^23-25,90

Thermal decomposition in air

The thermoanalytical curves recorded in air are presented in Figure 4. For Cd, Ni and Zn complexes, the respective sulfides were produced after the first decomposition step and were converted to oxide (Zn) or oxysulfates (Cd and Ni) by further heating of the residue (see Table 5). The detection of oxysulfates as decomposition intermediates is in agreement with previous results.²⁴ The copper complex decomposed in a different way, generating Cu₂S(CN)₂, oxysulfate and finally the oxide, according to the X-ray diffraction patterns of the residues.⁸⁹ Crystalline changes and melting processes were also observed, in agreement with the data obtained under N₂ and reported in the previous section.

Results indicated that the following stability order can be established, according to the temperature in which decomposition starts: Ni(hex)₂ > Cd(hex)₂ > Zn(hex)₂ > Cu(hex)₂.

Conclusions

The Hhex is the weaker acid when compared to the series of cyclic DTC derived from pyrrolidine, piperidine and hexamethyleneamine, respectively 5, 6 and 7-membered aminic rings. The limiting half life (t_1/2lim) suggests that hex is more stable than piperidinedithiocarbamate (pip) and morpholinedithiocarbamate (mor) and much less stable than pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (pyr).^23,90

The thermal analytical studies revealed that sulfides were the main residues obtained under nitrogen atmosphere, which were reduced to the elementary metals in the case of the copper(II) and zinc(II) complexes. Oxysulfates were observed in air as intermediates of the decomposition of Ni(hex)₂, Cu(hex)₂ and Cd(hex)₂, while oxides were obtained as final decomposition products. The nickel(II) complex was the most stable in this series.

Received: September 19, 2005

Published on the web: May 16, 2006

FAPESP helped in meeting the publication costs of this article.

• 1. Kitson, T.; Education in Chemistry 1985, 43.
• 2. Rabbi, M.F.; Finnegan, A.; Al-Hartli, L.; Stong, S.; Roebuck K.A.; Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology 1998, 19, 321.
• 3. Topping, R.M.; Jones, M.M.; Med. Hipothesys 1989, 27, 55.
• 4. Weuffen, A.; Kewitsch, A.; Arch. Exp. Veterinaermed. 1967, 21, 1049.
• 5. Powell, A.K.; Brit. J. Cancer 1954, 8, 529.
• 6. Hill, J. O.; Chirawongaram, S.; J. Thermal Anal. 1994, 41, 511.
• 7. Sharma, A.K.; Thermochim. Acta 1986, 104, 339.
• 8. Magee, R.J.; Hill, J.O.; Rev. Anal. Chem. 1985, 8, 5.
• 9. Bond, A.M.; Martin, R.L.; Coord. Chem. Rev. 1984, 54, 23.
• 10. Sengupta, S.K.; Kumar, S.; Termochim. Acta 1984, 72, 349.
• 11. Hill, J.O.; Magee, R.J.; Rev. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 3, 141.
• 12. Coucovanis, D.; Progr. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 26, 301.
• 13. Coucovanis, D.; Progr. Inorg. Chem. 1970, 11, 233.
• 14. Hulanicki, A.; Talanta 1967, 14, 1371.
• 15. Thorn, G.D.; Ludwig, R.A.; The Dithiocarbamates and Related Compounds, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1962.
• 16. Castro, E.A.; Cortes, R.; Santos, J.G.; Vega, J.C.; J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3774.
• 17. De-Filippo, D.; Deplano, P.; Devillanova, F.; Trogu, E.F.; Verani G.; J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 560.
• 18. Usatenko, Y.I.; Barkalov, U.S.; Tulypa, F.M.; J. Anal. Chem.-USSR. 1970, 25, 1458.
• 19. Aspila, K.I.; Chakrabarti, C.L.; Sastri, V.S.; Anal. Chem. 1973, 45, 363.
• 20. Joris, S.J.; Aspila, K.I.; Chakrabarti, C.L.; J. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 860.
• 21. Vandebeek, R.R.; Joris, S.J.; Aspila, K.I.; Chakrabarti, C.L.; Can. J. Chem. 1970, 48, 2204.
• 22. Aspila, K.I.; Sastri, V.S.; Chakrabarti, C.L.; Talanta 1969, 16, 1099.
• 23. Cavalheiro, E.T.G.; Chierice, G.O.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 1997, 8, 53.
• 24. Cavalheiro, E.T.G.; Ionashiro, M.; Marino, G.; Breviglieri, S.T.; Chierice, G.O.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 1999, 10, 65.
• 25. Cavalheiro, E.T.G.; Ionashiro, M.; Marino, G.; Breviglieri, S.T.; Chierice, G.O.; Transit. Metal Chem. 2000, 25, 69.
• 26. Bundalevska, J.M.; Koyuncu, I.; Ay, O., Cundeva; K.; Akcin, G.; Stafilov, T.; J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2005, 40, 1045.
• 27. Kojuncu, Y.; Bundalevska, J.M.; Ay, U.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Akcin, G.; Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 2751.
• 28. Ay, U.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Zajkova, V.P.; Pavlovska, G.; Anal. Lett. 2004, 37, 695.
• 29. Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Pavlovska, G.; Karadjova, I.; Arpadjan, S.; Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2003, 83, 1009.
• 30. Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Zendelovska, D.; Sep. Sci. Technol. 2003, 38, 1111.
• 31. Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Anal. Lett. 2002, 35, 2347.
• 32. Pavlovska, G.; Stafilov, T.; Cundeva; K.; Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 2001, 369, 670.
• 33. Stafilov, T.; Cundeva; K.; Pavlovska, G.; Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2001, 80, 269.
• 34. Stafilov, T.; Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Zendelovska, D.; Paneva, V.; J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2001, 360 , 735.
• 35. Zendelovska, D.; Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Talanta 2001, 54, 139.
• 36. Zendelovska, D.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Mikrochim. Acta 2000, 135, 55.
• 37. Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Pavlovska, G.; Microchem. J. 2000, 65, 165.
• 38. Stafilov, T.; Zendelovska, D.; Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 2002, 57, 907.
• 39. Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Croatia Chemica Acta 2001, 74, 121.
• 40. Stafilov, T.; Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Turk. J. Chem. 2000, 24, 303.
• 41. Stafilov, T.; Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Michrochem. J. 1998, 60, 32.
• 42. Pavlovska, G.; Stafilov, T.; Cundeva; K.; Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 361, 213.
• 43. Paneva, V.Z.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 2005, 60, 403.
• 44. Cundeva; K.; Pavlovska, G.; Stafilov, T.; J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2001, 66, 709.
• 45. Pavlovska, G.; Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Sep. Sci. Technol. 2000, 35, 2663.
• 46. Cundeva; K.; Stafilov, T.; Pavlovska, G.; Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 2000, 55, 1081.
• 47. Ichinoki, S.; Okamoto, Y.; Ishikuma, H.; Fujii, Y.; J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2003, 26, 2797.
• 48. Shijo, Y.; Yoshida, H.; Kitamura, T.; Yoshimoto, E.; Uehara, N.; Anal. Sci. 1996, 12, 761.
• 49. Ichinoki, S.; Yamazaki, M.; Omura, M.; Nagai, R.; Bunseki Kagaku 1996, 45, 837.
• 50. Falter, R.;Scholer, H.F.; Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1995, 353, 34.
• 51. Ichinoki, S.; Yamazaki, M.; J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1991, 29, 184.
• 52. Ichinoki, S.; Yamazaki, M.; Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 662.
• 53. Frigge, C.; Jackwerth, E.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 271, 299.
• 54. Buhler, A.; Jackwerth, E.; Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1992, 343, 362.
• 55. Fang, Z.L.; Dong, L.P.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1992, 7, 439.
• 56. Fang, Z.L.; Sperling, M.; Welz, B.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1991, 6, 301.
• 57. Frigge, C.; Jackwerth, E.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1991, 242, 99.
• 58. Byrko, V.M.; Vizhenskii, V.A.; Molchanova, T.P.; J. Anal. Chem. USSR 1987, 42, 251.
• 59. Yamamoto, Y.; Nishino, Y.; Ueda, K.; Talanta 1985, 32, 662.
• 60. Yamamoto, Y.; Sugita, M.; Ueda, K.; Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 742.
• 61. Tokahoglu, S.; Kartal, S.; Elci L.; Bull Kor. Chem. Soc. 2002, 23, 693.
• 62. Alexandrova, A.; Arpadjan, S.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 307, 71.
• 63. Alexandrova, A.; Arpadjan, S.; Analyst 1993, 118, 1309.
• 64. Wommel, S.; Calmano, W.; Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica 1992, 265.
• 65. Dapaah, A.R.K.; Takano, N.; Ayame, A.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 386, 281.
• 66. Dapaah, A.R.K.; Ayame, A.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 360, 26.
• 67. Dapaah, A.R.K.; Ayame, A.; Anal. Sci. 1997, 13, 405.
• 68. Miyazake, A.; Sampei, T.; Tao, H.; Nagase, T.; Nippon Kagaku Kaishi 1992, 307.
• 69. Tao, H.; Miyazake, A.; Bamsho, K.; Unezaki, Y.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1984, 156, 159.
• 70. Tsalev, D.L.; Petrova, V.P.; Dokladi Na Bolgarskata Akademiya Na Naukite 1979, 32, 911.
• 71. Dornemann, A.; Kleist, H.; Analyst 1979, 104, 1030.
• 72. Tsalev, D.L.; Dokladi Na Bolgarskata Akademiya Na Naukite 1979, 32, 779.
• 73. Berndt, H.; Jackwerth, E.; Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1978, 290, 369.
• 74. Busev, A.I.; Tereshchenko, A.P.; Naidina, V.P.; J. Anal. Chem. USSR 1976, 31, 944.
• 75. Busev, A.I.; Byrko, V.N.; Tereshchenko, A.P.; Novikova, N.N.; Naidina, V.P.; Terentev, P.B.; Zhurnal Analiticheskoi Khimii 1970, 25, 665.
• 76. Alekseev, T.A.; Tresvyat, P.A.; Treshch, A.P.; Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 45, 1669.
• 77. Yamase, T.; Kokado, H.; Inoue, E.; Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1972, 45, 726.
• 78. Yamase, T.; Kokado, H.; Inoue, E.; Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1970, 43, 669.
• 79. Yamase, T.; Kokado, H.; Inoue, E.; Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1970, 43, 934.
• 80. Zvonkova, Z.V.; Yakovenk, V.I.; Soviet Physics Crystalography 1968, 13, 134.
• 81. Zvonkova, Z.V.; Poveteva, Z.P.; Vozzenni, V.M.; Gluskova, V.P.; Jakovenk, V.I.; Khvatkin, A.N.; Acta Crystallographica S 1966, 21, A155 Part 7S.
• 82. Pavlicek, M.; Travnicek, Z.; Pastorek, R.; Marek, J.; Transition Met. Chem. (Dordrecht, Neth.) 2003, 28, 260.
• 83. Dahiya, K.K.; Kaushik, N.K.; Thermochim. Acta 1989, 141, 69.
• 84. Dahiya, K.K.; Kaushik, N.K.; Indian J. Chem., Sect. A: Inorg., Bio-inorg., Phys., Theor. Anal. Chem. 1988, 27, 449.
• 85. Ramos, L.A.; Cavalheiro, E.T.G.; Chierice, G.O.; J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2005, 79, 349.
• 86. Roussel-Uclaf (ROUS); FR2081589-A5; FR2081589-A, 1970 (AN 1972: 501408).
• 87. Elving, P.J., Morkowitz, J.M.; Rosenthal, I.; Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 1179.
• 88. Cavalheiro, E.T.G.; Plepis, A.M.G.; Chierice, G.O.; Neves, E.F.A.; Polyhedron 1987, 9, 1717.
• 89. International Centre for Diffraction Data. Power Diffraction File (CD-ROM). Newton Square, ICDD, 1994.
• 90. Antunes, P.A.; Breviglieri, S.T.; Chierice, G.O.; Cavalheiro, E.T.G.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2001, 12, 473.
• 91. Nakamoto, K.; Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, 3^rd ed.; John Wiley: New York, 1977.
• 92. Preti, C.; Tosi, G.; Zanini, P.; J. Mol. Struct. 1979, 53, 35.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  25 Aug 2006
• Date of issue
  Aug 2006

History

• Received
  19 Sept 2005