Non-Thermal Plasma Induced Total Mineralization of Glyphosate in Water in the Presence of Iron II Ions

Abstract

The present work focused on the mineralization of herbicide glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine) (C₃H₈NO₅P) in aqueous phase by Glidarc plasma following the orthophosphates released and the reduction of the total organic carbon (TOC). Furthermore, the effect of initial concentration, pH and the degradation process of glyphosate in the presence of Fe²⁺ were also examined. The results showed that the efficiency of degradation increased with the presence of ferrous ions as catalysts in aqueous medium and also the release of orthophosphate is more efficient in acid medium with pH range of 3.5-6.3. The kinetics of the release of orthophosphate and the TOC removal obey the first order rate law. The ninhydrin and orthophosphates tests showed that the degradation of glyphosate in water by Glidarc plasma was mainly by OH and NO attacked with C–N and C–P bond cleavage leading to complete mineralization.

glyphosate; Glidarc discharge; orthophosphate release; mineralization

Introduction

Glyphosate also called N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine (NPG) of chemical formula C₃H₈NO₅P is a nonselective systemic broad spectrum herbicide used for weed control. Glyphosate is absorbed by the leaves and carried by the phloem till the extremities of roots and rhizomes, where it inhibits the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids by bonding to 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate syntase enzyme.¹ This herbicide was extensively used in European and American agricultural exploitations in the early 1970s. Faced with the problem of famine that characterizes most third-world countries, particularly African countries, the use of this herbicide, based on its ability of fertilizing and destroying annual and perennial weeds was intensified and widespread with leitmotiv the food safety for a growing population. High solubility of glyphosate in water¹ and the fact that less than 1% often reaches the target makes that, a component of herbicide spills unto surface waters. It thus becomes a potential contaminant with harmful effects on the environment.² In water, glyphosate is rapidly dissipated through adsorption on suspended matters and sediments, and has a half-life of 19 to 45 days for the whole system.³ Although recognized to be non toxic for mammals, human beings and birds,⁴ Bolognesis et al.⁵ showed that glyphosate produces positive genotoxic effects in vitro in human peripheral blood, evidenced by sister chromatids exchange and in vivo in mouse. Similarly in their previous works, Clements et al.⁶ reported positive DNA damage for comet assay in erythrocytes of Rana castesbeiana tadpoles following exposure to glyphosate. In the same vein, Polettaet al.⁷ and Manas et al.⁸ respectively revealed DNA damage after performing comet assay and micronucleus test on the erythrocytes of broad-snouted Caiman latirostris and fetal bovin serum exposed to glyphosate. In spite of its hydrolytic decomposition with a greater than 35 days mean half-life at various pH levels and temperatures,⁹ this herbicide is classified among the organic molecules frequently detected in streams and rivers, and generally exceeds the European standard for drinking (1 μg L⁻¹) and surface water (1-3 μg L⁻¹).¹⁰ Although being very sensitive to degradation by microorganisms, glyphosate degradation in water and soil yields more toxic intermediates,³ i.e., aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) and sarcosine, which could further be degraded slowly into water, phosphate and carbon dioxide. Within the purview of the relevance of this ecological problem, the control and elimination of glyphosate and other organic pollutants becomes imperious for environmental safety.

Previous studies reported the glyphosate degradation using processes such as hydrogen peroxide-based advanced oxidation processes (H₂O₂/UV, H₂O₂/O₃/UV, H₂O₂/Cl⁻, Fenton, photo-Fenton, Fe(III)/Na₂C₂O₄/UV, FeOH/UV, H₂O₂/UVC),^11-13 titanium dioxide-based advanced oxidation processes (TiO₂/UV)^14,15 and manganese oxide in aqueous suspension.¹⁶ Efficiencies obtained with these processes are relative and the costs of set up often expensive. Non-thermal plasma (NTP), an environmental friendly technique, can be a good alternative for organic pollutants abatement in water. For some time in the past, NTP has shown its proofs to be a promising technology for organic pollutants abatement in gaseous, liquid, and solid phases.¹⁷ Environmental applications of electric discharges are being considered increasingly; they imply the chemical properties of the activated species generated by the discharge.¹⁸ There are many types of non-thermal plasmas,¹⁹ but in this work, we focused on gliding arc discharge commonly called Glidarc. The Glidarc device is an inexpensive source of NTP, which operates at conditions close to atmospheric pressure and room temperature. The analysis with spectroscopy emission has identified OH and NO radicals as responsible of oxidative properties of Glidarc plasma plume when humid air is used as feeding gas.²⁰ These radicals are precursors of other active species, which endow the reaction medium a very high enhanced chemical reactivity.¹⁹ The chemical reactivity of Glidarc has been utilized with success in both the degradation of several dissolved organic compounds^21,22 and industrial effluents.²³

The present work focused on the study of the mechanism of mineralization of glyphosate in aqueous phase by Glidarc plasma. Mineralization via the orthophosphates released and the total organic carbon (TOC) was studied. Furthermore, the effect of initial concentration, initial pH and the degradation process of glyphosate in the presence of Fe²⁺ were also examined. The kinetics was studied and a plausible degradation pathway of glyphosate in water by NTP was proposed.

Experimental

Materials and reagents

Glyphosate (Figure 1) 98.5% was purchased from Dr Ehrenstorfer Gmbh (Bgm Schlosser-Str., Augsburg, Germany). Aqueous solutions of glyphosate were prepared by dissolving 6.0 mg of highly soluble glyphosate salt in distilled water. All other reagents were of analytical grade and were used without purification. Molar solutions of NaOH and H₂SO₄ were used to adjust the pH values to study the influence of initial pH on glyphosate degradation by humid air plasma. 4.0 mol L⁻¹ acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer (HAc-NaAC; pH 5.5) was prepared for ninhydrin method,²⁴ which involves the reaction of alpha-amino acid and ninhydrin resulting in a colored solution absorbing in 570 nm.

Figure 1
Chemical structure of glyphosate.

Apparatus

The gliding arc device used for this study was described previously.¹⁷ It derived from the original device described by Czernichowski et al.¹⁷ Figure 2 presents a scheme of the experimental device. When a suitable voltage (5-10 kV) and electric current (160 mA)²⁵ are applied between two aluminum divergent electrodes, an electric arc forms at the shortest electrode gap (3 mm) and glides along the electrode's axis pushed on by a gas flow (humid air). The arc length increases on moving and its temperature decreases, so that the arc turns from thermal plasma to quenched plasma on breaking into a plume. A new arc then forms at the narrowest gap and the cycle resumes as a large plasma plume. The plasma plume leaks the liquid target brought to its contact at overall room temperature and pressure, close to atmospheric conditions.¹⁷ The electric energy is transferred to gas molecules, which become excited and are broken into radicals giving highly reactive species such as OH and NO according to the following equations.¹⁸

Figure 2
Experimental setup of Glidarc plasma. (A = air entrance; electrode gap E = 3 mm; electrode ray I = 2 cm; electrode length d = 7 cm; distance electrodes-target surface L = 1.5 cm; reactor diameter D = 8 cm; high of solution in the reactor H = 10 cm; W = water pump).

The diffusion process in the liquid is improved by convection in the liquid phase due to the airflow and magnetic stirring. Treatments were carried out in a closed batch reactor for different plasma-exposure time. The reactor is equipped with a cooling system to avoid evaporation and the temperature was kept constant at 24 ± 0.1 °C for all treatments.

Analytical methods

The pH adjustment was followed using a multifunctional digital pH-meter branded HANNA. FeSO₄ was added to the solution as a ferrous ions (Fe²⁺) catalyst source. The monitoring of reduction of glyphosate concentration in solution after Glidarc plasma treatment, proceeded as follows: glyphosate solution (1 mL) and ninhydrin solution (1 mL) were put in screw-capped test tubes and heated in a boiling water bath for a pre-determined period of time. After heating, the tubes were immediately cooled in an ice-bath, then; 5 mL of 50% ethanol was added into each tube and thoroughly mixed with a Vortex mixer for 30 s. The residual glyphosate was followed by spectrophotometry at 570 nm. The reduction product obtained from ninhydrin then reacts with NH₃ and excess ninhydrin to yield a blue colored substance.²⁴ Orthophosphates (PO₄-P) formed as result of degradation of glyphosate were measured according to the standard methods with a spectrophotometer at 700 nm, based on the formation of a blue molybdenum complex and after digestion using peroxodisulfate (K₂S₂O₈), respectively.²⁶ All experiments (manipulations and analysis) were duplicated. Glyphosate degradation was also evaluated by analyzing the TOC content of the samples using a Shimadzu TOC-VE analyzer equipped with a non selective infrared detector. Calibration was done before, and destruction of the parent pesticide (glyphosate) was then confirmed by measuring its TOC in both untreated and treated samples by comparison with pure glyphosate standards.

Calculations

The release of orthophosphates in the solution [%(PO₄-P)] and the TOC abatement rate were respectively calculated using equations 7 and 8.

%(PO₄-P) is the orthophosphates release efficiency, [PO₄-P]_t in mg L⁻¹ the orthophosphates concentration at treatment time t, [PO₄-P]₀ the residual concentration of orthophosphate found before treatment²⁷ and [PO₄-P]_tot the total concentration of orthophosphate releasable calculated considering that each molecule of glyphosate releases one molecule of orthosphosphate. h is the TOC reduction percentage, TOC₀ the initial total organic carbon and TOC_t the TOC at treatment time, t.

Results

The study of the degradation of glyphosate by Glidarc humid air plasma was followed by measuring the orthophosphates released and the TOC values as a function of exposure time together with ninhydrin test to highlight the breaking of C–N bond.

The working parameters fixed were: the distance between the ends of the electrodes and the liquid surface (1.5 cm), the lengths of the electrodes (6.0 cm), the nozzle diameter by which the plasmogen gas flows (1 mm) and the gas flow rate (800.0 L h⁻¹).

For the study, the pH of the pristine solution was 6.3 and the initial concentration of glyphosate 33.0 μmol L⁻¹. The TOC found was 215.0 mg L⁻¹ and the residual concentration of orthophosphates 0.097 mg L⁻¹.

Glyphosate degradation

Figure 3 shows the visible spectrum of glyphosate degradation after ninhydrin colorimetric assay. From this figure, it is clear that, just after 5 min of exposure, the intensity of the signal decreases substantially and disappears after 30 min of treatment.

Figure 3
The visible absorbance spectra of glyphosate after ninhydrin colorimetric test. (a) 0 min; (b) 5 min; (c) 10 min; (d) 15 min; (e) 30 min. [NPG]₀ = 33.0 µmol L⁻¹, pH₀ 6.3.

Release of orthophosphates by cleavage of C–P bond

Figure 4 shows that glyphosate exposed to Glidarc plasma released orthophosphates (PO₄-P). It also shows the variations of orthophosphates formed for various exposure times. Orthophosphate release is continuous and increases with exposure time. The curve leveled off after 30 min of treatment.

Figure 4
Profile of orthophosphates formation against exposure time during plasma treatment under the following conditions (initial concentration [NPG]₀ = 33.0 µmol L⁻¹, pH 6.3). Zone I is characterized by first-order in relation to substrate. Zone II the orthophosphate production rate decreases and tends to zero.

Kinetics of orthophosphate released

From Figure 4, it can be observed that, the kinetics of release of orthophosphates obey the first-order rate law with a rate constant of 7.83 × 10⁻² min⁻¹. The interval of time (0 ≤ t < 30 min) is the most significant and relevant because 93.72% of orthophosphates were released within this period. After 30 min, a landing is observed showing the decrease in the degradation rate of glyphosate (Figure 4).

Influence of initial pH on the release of orthophosphates

Figure 5 shows the plasma degradation of glyphosate with formation of orthophosphates in the range of pH 3.5-11.0. Glyphosate can be efficiently transformed into orthophosphates at pH 3.5-6.3. It also shows that the degradation was slow for the higher values of pH (pH > 6). Initial pH values governed the degradation of glyphosate by plasma.

Figure 5
Effect of initial pH (★ 3.5; ► 5.0; ▼ 6.3; ▲ 7.5; ● 9.0; ■ 11.0) on the degradation of glyphosate ([NPG]₀ = 33.0 µmol L⁻¹) by plasma.

Effect of initial concentrations on the release of orthophosphates

As shown in Figure 6, the efficiency of orthophosphate released increases with the increase in the initial concentrations. For example, when the initial concentration of glyphosate is 33.0 μmol L⁻¹ and pH 3.5, 93.72% of orthophosphates was produced after 30 min of exposure, whereas under the same conditions with an initial concentration of 5.5 μmol L⁻¹, only 75.78% of orthophosphates was released. It is observed that as for higher initial concentration, higher degradation occurred.

Figure 6
Effect of initial concentrations of glyphosate: ■ 5.5; ● 11.0; ▲ 22.0; ▼ 33.0 µmol L⁻¹ on the release of orthophosphates at initial pH 3.5.

Effect of Fe²⁺ catalysis

Figure 7 shows that the formation of PO₄-P increased with the presence of ferrous ions acting as catalyst in the aqueous medium. Addition of Fe²⁺ 0.1 mmol L⁻¹ permitted to obtain 90.60% of orthophosphate release after 15 min of plasma exposure compared to 60.61% obtained for the plasma treatment alone. It is also noticed that an increase in the concentration of ferrous ions increased the formation of PO₄-P. With an initial concentration [NPG]₀ = 33.0 μmol L⁻¹ and an pH 6.3, the formation of orthophosphate was fast in the presence of Fe²⁺ and equilibrium was attained after 40 min of exposure. However, it is observed that excessive addition of catalyst acts negatively on the glyphosate degradation: the uses of 0.2 mmol L⁻¹ ferrous ions diminished the efficacy of PO₄-P release from 90.60% to 80.44% after 15 min of exposure to Glidarc plasma.

Figure 7
Influence of ferrous ions concentration: ■ 0.0; ● 0.02; ▲ 0.05; ▼ 0.1; ★ 0.2 mmol L⁻¹ on the catalysis of PO₄-P released ([NPG]₀ = 33.0 µmol L⁻¹, pH 3.5).

TOC content

Figure 8 shows that glyphosate exposed to plasma can be mineralized into CO₂. The TOC concentration decreased with time and an abatement of 68.8% was reached after 90 min of treatment in the absence of iron II ions.

Figure 8
Plot of total organic compound (TOC) against exposure time. The insert shows a linear correlation between ln(TOC) and exposure time which fit the first order rate law, (k = 1.39 × 10⁻² min−¹).

The degradation was slow between 0-10 min. Figure 8 also shows the plot of ln(TOC) versus exposure time and suggests that the kinetics of TOC reduction is first-order with a kinetic constant k = 1.39 × 10⁻² min⁻¹.

Figure 9 shows the combined effect of plasma and ferrous ions on glyphosate degradation. The mineralization of glyphosate is more efficient when ferrous ions are added to the target solution. Table 1 gives the rate constants for each concentration of ferrous ions added to the medium.

Figure 9
Influence of ferrous ions concentration: ■ 0.0; ● 0.02; ▲ 0.05; ▼ 0.1; ★ 0.2 mmol L⁻¹ on the mineralization of glyphosate ([NPG]₀ = 33.0 μmol L⁻¹, pH 3.5).

Table 1
Rate constants of TOC removal

[Fe2+] / (mmol L-1)	Rate constant k / min-1	Correlation coefficient R2	Standard error on rate constant
0.00	1.39 × 10-2	0.989	9.96 × 10-4
0.02	5.98 × 10-2	0.995	5.22 × 10-4
0.05	6.26 × 10-2	0.970	0.11 × 10-4
0.10	7.14 × 10-2	0.987	9.17 × 10-4
0.20	6.51 × 10-2	0.963	0.14 × 10-4

Glyphosate degradation pathway

As mentioned previously, glyphosate can be degraded by Glidarc plasma via C–N and C–P bond cleavages leading to mineralization (Figure 10). The ninhydrin method based on the formation of the colored Ruhemann purple compound of primary amine showed that glyphosate possibly underwent C–N bonds breakage. The C–P bond cleavage also occurred and was evidenced by the formation of orthophosphates and TOC removal.

Figure 10
A proposed pathway of glyphosate degradation by Glidarc plasma.

Discussion

The above results showed that glyphosate is effectively degraded by humid air plasma. The formation of orthophosphates and decrease in the TOC concentration are proofs of the degradation of this compound and can be considered as the results of the interaction between the strong oxidizing agents present in humid air plasma and the solute at the plasma-liquid interface. Previous work suggested that OH and NO were the main activated species present in humid air plasma plume.²¹ OH is the most powerful oxidizing agent and, as other radicals, it has a very short half-life (1 ms).²⁸ Therefore, the entire OH formed by conventional electron impact dissociation of water molecules could not, during that short time, react with target molecules. Consequently, part of radicals, which did not react because of the dilution of the target, combine together to form H₂O₂ in aqueous phase. This was evidenced and measured by previous works.^29,30 Since OH is a stronger oxidizing agent after fluorine with a standard potential (OH/H₂O) = 2.72 V,³¹ it likely participated in the plasma-chemical degradation processes of organic compounds. Apart from OH and H₂O₂, some other species such as HO₂, ONOO⁻, O₃ and O,^30,32 are formed and are also thermodynamically able to oxidize organic compounds. Previous investigation on the degradation of glyphosate also showed that the mechanism path involves many radical steps.¹³

Figure 4 shows that the glyphosate can be attacked by reactive species (OH and NO) of Glidarc humid air plasma leading to the formation of PO₄³⁻. This formation can be explained by the breakage of C–P and O–H bonds in the phosphonate group of the substrate. The abstraction of hydrogen follows radical mechanism and radical H formed is ionized and contributed to acidify the aqueous medium (Figure 10). First order kinetic model is in agreement with the experimental data of the orthophosphates released. The rate-limiting factors are the concentrations of the plasma active species (depends on the energy provided to the discharge) at the reaction zone and the concentration of the substrate.^33,34 The level-off after 30 min corresponds to a drastic decrease in the effective contact between the plasma and the glyphosate, when the volume of organic phase becomes too low to cover the entire liquid surface and thus to maintain an efficient interface. The orthophosphate production rate decreases and tends to zero. Kinetics of formation of orthophosphates in each time interval (Figure 4) showed that the mechanism of their formation by degradation of glyphosate is a multi-step with overall first order.³³

The initial pH and the initial concentration of glyphosate also influenced the rate of formation of orthophosphates by degradation by humid air plasma. As shown in Figure 5, the degradation of glyphosate is more efficient for low values of initial pH. Glyphosate is an amphoteric compound; the basic form of glyphosate quickly undergoes degradation by plasma than the acid form (Figure 10). This pH dependence of glyphosate degradation can also be attributed to the speciation of OH and NO radical, since there are more efficient in acidic medium.²⁹ Oxidising degradation reactions of organic compounds often involve protons; thus, the kinetic rate very often depends on the acidity of the medium. Furthermore, the pH values govern the relative amount of O₂⁻/HO₂, which is also precursor of H₂O₂ formation and leads to more OH. Besides previous works using plasma for degradation of organic compounds,^35,36 reported that, the increasing of initial pH decreases the rate constant. This observation is attributed to the fact that OH, HO₂ and H₂O₂ have higher oxidation effect in acidic medium.³⁷

The initial concentration of target molecules plays an important role in the treatment of waste water by Glidarc discharge since the final application is in the industries where the effluents are relatively concentrated. It comes out from Figure 6 that the orthophosphate release is more efficient for concentrated solutions. This is due to the fact that with concentrated solutions, the probability of collision between primary (OH, NO) and secondary (H₂O₂, NO₂) active species and molecules of glyphosate at the reaction interface is more important.³⁵ The effective surface between the plasma and glyphosate is low for dilute solutions³³ and the rate of degradation is earlier governs by diffusion process comparatively to more concentrated solutions that the reaction rate is for a relative long time controlled by OH.³⁸ It could therefore be suggested that higher rate of degradation occurred for higher initial concentrations contrary to results obtained in previous works.³⁹ However, after 90 min of exposure, almost the same rate of orthophosphates is produced both for dilute and concentrated solutions of glyphosate.

When glyphosate solution is mixed with ferrous ions and exposed to Glidarc plasma flame, the rate of degradation increases due to H₂O₂ consumption by Fe²⁺ to form OH radicals leading to increase the rate of degradation of glyphosate.⁴⁰ The Gliding arc plasma in humid air/Fenton mechanism that accompanies the above suggestions is:

Although Abdelmalek et al.⁴⁰ in their previous work found that the catalytic activity of ferrous ions is probably negligible in humid air plasma because of eventual oxidation by nitrites, which parasites their reaction with hydrogen peroxide to form OH, our study showed that the catalytic effect of Fe²⁺ was not negligible in the case of degradation of glyphosate. This may be due to the presence in the medium of PO₄³⁻ ions, which can probably hinder the reaction of nitrites with ferrous ions by electron acceptor limitation. An excess of catalyst reduces the mass transfer and therefore the kinetics of degradation likewise. Figure 7 showed that the production of PO₄³⁻ increases with an increase Fe²⁺ concentration. Its proofs that ferrous ions can sufficiently utilize the residual hydrogen peroxide generated by plasma to produce a larger amount of the reactive, non-selective radicals OH (equation 9 to equation 18), which rapidly mineralize glyphosate and produce orthophosphates.⁴¹ However, an excess of Fe²⁺ scavenged OH radicals and slowed the degradation of glyphosate as described by nonoxidizing reaction (equation 16).^41,42

A significant increase in TOC reduction of glyphosate solution is also observed (Figure 8). The percentage of TOC reduction reached 68.42% after 90 min of exposure to gliding arc plasma in absence of iron II ions. However, the reduction in TOC was almost zero during the first 10 min, which can be considered, as an induction period and attributed to the low concentration of oxidizing species at the reaction interface.³³ As we can see, the mineralization is appreciable and goes in straight line with the TOC reduction measured in the case of degradation of other organic compound by gliding arc discharge in humid air.^23,32,43,44 The kinetics of TOC reduction was studied and showed to be first order (Figure 8). The rate of mineralization of glyphosate when exposed to Glidarc in humid air increases with the addition of ferrous ions in the buffer aqueous medium (Figure 9) due to the increase of OH coming from decomposition of H₂O₂^45-47 produced in the discharges and evidenced by Burlica et al.²⁹ The TOC reduction also increases with the concentration of the catalyst. The kinetic rates of TOC reduction increased with the concentration of ferrous ions to a certain value and decreased (Table 1). This may be due to the fact that the excessive addition of ferrous ions operates negatively on glyphosate degradation. This phenomenon can be explained by the existence of parasitical reaction, which consumes OH radicals.⁴⁶ Similar results were obtained by Souza et al. who uses the Fenton process.⁴⁸ The low rate of mineralization (28% after 120 min of treatment) that they obtained may be due to the fact that they have been working with the commercial formulation.

Figures 3, 4 and 8 show that glyphosate is degraded by Glidarc plasma via C–N and C–P bonds breakage followed by a considerable reduction in TOC as reported in the previous works using advanced oxidized processes (AOPs).^13-15,49 The cleavage of C–N and C–P bonds is attributed to OH radicals. Thus, Figure 10 proposes a probable reaction pathway of glyphosate degradation by Glidarc plasma.

As can be seen in Figure 10, the OH radical attacks glyphosate (step 2), which leads to the formation of a carbon centred radical ⁻OOC-CH₂-NH₂⁺-CH₂-O-O and orthophosphates.¹⁶ The generated radical can react with molecular oxygen (step 3)⁵⁰ present in the medium at high concentration to give a new radical ⁻OOC-CH₂-NH₂⁺-CH₂-O-O, which reacts directly with NO (step 4) and then H₂O (step 5) to form ⁻OOC-CH₂-NH₃⁺, and CH₂O.⁴⁹ Glycine may undergo decarboxylation due to the presence of OH (step 6) to give CO₂ and CH₂-NH₃⁺ radical. CH₂-NH₃⁺ then reacts with O₂ and OH (step 7 and 8), respectively to yield formaldehyde and NH₄⁺. The formaldehyde generated in the process can be directly oxidized into formic acid by the dissolved oxygen and mineralized into CO₂ by combined action of OH and once more oxygen.^49,51

Conclusions

The aim of this work was to study the degradation of glyphosate by the gliding arc discharge. It was found that gliding arc discharge can efficiently degrade glyphosate evidenced by the formation of orthophosphates. The efficiency of orthophosphate increases with the increase of initial concentration. The degradation is more efficient in acid medium with the best pH values in the range of 3.5-6.3. The gliding arc discharge mineralizes glyphosate evidenced by a measure of the percentage of TOC reduction. The ferrous ions can catalyze the degradation of glyphosate, thus improving the efficiency of orthophosphate released and the TOC reduction. The kinetics of the release of orthophosphate by gliding arc discharge obeyed first-order rate law with kinetic constant 7.83 × 10⁻² min⁻¹. The kinetics of the TOC reduction was also first order with a kinetic constant 1.39 × 10⁻² min⁻¹. The degradation of glyphosate by gliding arc discharge was mainly done by hydroxyl radical and NO followed by the C–N and C–P cleavages.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this work thank the Twas-CNPq Doctoral programme and the Laboratory of Interfacial Electrochemistry and Analytical Chemistry (LEICA) of the University of Rouen for the donation of equipments to the Laboratory of Mineral Chemistry of the University of Yaoundé I, which immensely help to the accomplishment of a part of this work. We are also indebted to Dr Luís Otávio de Brito Benoteli for his contribution to the revision of this paper, and the International Foundation of Sciences (IFS) for the grant given to Dr Nzali Serge. The materials provided to him equally helped in some analysis of this work. Also, the authors like to thank Prof Emmanuel Ngameni for his significantly contribution to the critical review of the manuscript during the evaluations of reviewers of the JCBS.

References

• ¹
  Moses, M.; Toxicol. Ind. Health 1993, 9, 913.
• ²
  Gasnier, C.; Dumont, C.; Benachour, N.; Clair, E.; Chagnon, M. C.; Séralini, G-E.; Toxicology 2009, 262, 184.
• ³
  Vereecken, H.; Pest Manage. Sci. 2005, 61, 1139.
• ⁴
  US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA-738-F-93-011); Office of Prevention of Pesticides and Toxic Substances; Washington DC, 1993.
• ⁵
  Bolegnesis, C.; Bonatti, S.; Degan, P.; Gallerani, E.; Peluso, M.; Rabboni, R.; Roggieri, P.; Abbondandolo, A.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 1957.
• ⁶
  Clements, C.; Ralph, S.; Petras, M.; Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 1997, 29, 277.
• ⁷
  Poletta, G. L.; Larriera, A.; Kleinsorge, E.; Mudry, M. D.; Mutat. Res., Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2009, 672, 95.
• ⁸
  Manas, F.; Peralta, L.; Raviolo, J.; Ovando, H. G.; Weyers, A.; Ugnia, L.; Cid, M. G.; Larripa, I.; Gorla, N.; Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 28, 37.
• ⁹
  Kollman, W.; Segawa, R.; Department of Pesticide Regulation; EPA: Sacramento, 1995.
• ¹⁰
  Botta, F.; Lavison, G.; Coututier, G.; Alliot, F.; Moreau-Guigon, E.; Fauchon, N.; Guery, B.; Chevreuil, M.; Blanchoud, H.; Chemosphere 2009, 77, 133.
• ¹¹
  Junges, C. M.; Vidal, E. E.; Attademo, A. M.; Mariani, M. L.; Cardell, L.; Negro, A. C.; Cassan, A.; Peltzer, P. M.; Lajmanovich, R. C.; Zalazar, C. S.; J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B 2013, 48, 163.
• ¹²
  Ikehata, K.; El-Din, M. G.; J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2006, 5, 81.
• ¹³
  Chen, Y.; Wu, F.; Lin, Y.; Deng, N.; Bazhin, N.; Glebov, E.; J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 148, 360.
• ¹⁴
  Echavia, G. R. M.; Matzusawa, F.; Negishi, N.; Chemosphere 2009, 76, 995.
• ¹⁵
  Muneer, M.; Boxall, C.; Int. J. Photoenergy 2008, ID 197346, 1.
• ¹⁶
  Barret, K. A.; Mcbride, M. B.; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 9223.
• ¹⁷
  Czernikowski, A.; Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1301.
• ¹⁸
  Brisset, J-L.; Moussa, D.; Doubla, A.; Hnatiuc, E.; Hnatiuc, B.; Kamgang, G. Y.; Herry, J-M.; Naitali, M.; Bellon-Fontaine, M-N.; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 5761.
• ¹⁹
  Ghezzar, M. R.; Abdelmalek, F.; Belhadj, M.; Benderdouche, M.; Addou, A.; Appl. Catal., B 2007, 72, 304.
• ²⁰
  Benstaali, B.; Boubert, P.; Cheron, B. G.; Abdou, A.; Brisset, J-L.; Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2002, 22, 553.
• ²¹
  Fouodjouo, M.; Laminsi, S.; Djepang, S. A.; Tadom, D.; Brisset, J-L.; Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. 2013, 3, 316.
• ²²
  Laminsi, S.; Acayanka, E.; Teke-Ndifon, P.; Djowe-Tiya, A.; Brisset, J-L.; Environ. Eng. Manage. J. 2012, 11, 1821.
• ²³
  Mountapmbeme-Kouotou, P.; Laminsi, S.; Acayanka, E.; Brisset, J-L.; Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 5789.
• ²⁴
  Fisher, J. L.; Bunting, L. S.; Rosenberg, E. L.; Clin. Chem. 1963, 9, 573.
• ²⁵
  Hnatiuc, E.; Procédés Électriques de Mesure et de Traitement des Polluants, Lavoisier, ed., Tec&Doc Lavoisier: Paris, 2002, ch.10.
• ²⁶
  SEPA; Water and Waste Water Monitor and Analysis Methods, 4^th ed.; Chinese Environmental Science Press (CESP): Beijing, 2002.
• ²⁷
  Lesueur, C.; Pfeffer, M.; Fuerhacker, M.; Chemosphere 2005, 59, 685.
• ²⁸
  Bhattachrjee, S.; Curr. Sci. 2005, 89, 1113.
• ²⁹
  Burlica, R.; Kirkpatrick, M. J.; Locke, B.; J. Electrostat. 2006, 64, 35.
• ³⁰
  Chang, J. S.; Non Thermal Plasma Technique for Pollution Control: Part A and Part B; Nato-ASI Series; Penetrante, B. M.; Schultheis, S. E., eds.; Springer Verlag-Ecological Sciences 34: Berlin, 1993.
• ³¹
  Antelman, M. S.; The Encyclopaedia of Chemical Electrodes Potentials, 2^nd ed., Plenum Press: London, 1982.
• ³²
  Brisset, J-L.; Hnatiuc, E.; Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2012, 32, 655.
• ³³
  Moussa, D.; Brisset, J-L.; J. Hazard. Mat. 2003, 102, 189.
• ³⁴
  Brisset, J-L.; Benstaali, B.; Moussa, D.; Fanmoe, J.; Njoyim-Tamungang, E.; Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 20.
• ³⁵
  Wang, B.; Sun, B.; Zhu, X.; Yan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Contrib. Plasma Phys. 2013, 53, 697.
• ³⁶
  Liu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2008, 28, 15.
• ³⁷
  Sugiarto, A. T.; Ito, S.; Ohshima, T.; Satoa, M.; Skalny, J. D.; J. Electrostat. 2003, 58, 135.
• ³⁸
  Benetoli, L. O. D. B.; Cadorin, B. M.; Baldissarelli, V. Z.; Geremias, R.; De Souza, I. G.; Debacher, N. A.; J. Hazard. Mat. 2012, 55, 237.
• ³⁹
  Ni, G.; Zhao, G.; Jiang, Y.; Li, J.; Meng, Y.; Wang, X.; Plasma Processes Polym. 2013, 10, 353.
• ⁴⁰
  Abdelmalek, F.; Torres, R. A.; Combet, E.; Petrier, C.; Pulgarin, C.; Addou, A.; Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63, 30.
• ⁴¹
  Hao, X.; Zhou, M.; Xin, Q.; Lei, L.; Chemosphere 2007, 66, 2185.
• ⁴²
  Panizza, M.; Cerisola, G.; Water Res. 2009, 43, 339.
• ⁴³
  Tsagou-Sobze, E. B.; Moussa, D.; Doubla, A.; Hnatiuc, E.; Brisset, J.-L.; J. Hazard. Mat. 2008, 152, 446.
• ⁴⁴
  Marotta, E.; Ceriani, E.; Shapoval, V.; Schiorlin, M.; Ceretta, C.; Rea, M.; Paradisi, C.; Eur. Phys. J.: Appl. Phys. 2011, 55, 13811.
• ⁴⁵
  Boye, B.; Dieng, M. M.; Brillas, E.; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3030.
• ⁴⁶
  Oturan, M. A.; Oturan, N.; Lahitte, C.; Trévin, S.; J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001, 507, 96.
• ⁴⁷
  Joshi, A. A.; Locke, B.; Arce, P.; Finney, W. C.; J. Hazard. Mat. 1995, 41, 3.
• ⁴⁸
  Souza, D. R.; Trovó, A. G.; Antoniosi-Filho, N. R.; Silva, M. A. A.; Machado, A. E. H.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2013, 24, 1451.
• ⁴⁹
  Manassero, A.; Passalia, C.; Negro, A. C.; Cassano, A. E.; Zalazar, C. S.; Water Res. 2010, 44, 3875.
• ⁵⁰
  Fanmoe, J.; Kamgang, J. O.; Moussa, D.; Brisset, J-L.; Phys. Chem. News 2003, 14, 1.
• ⁵¹
  Krẏsa, J.; Waldner, G.; Mestànkovà, H.; Jirkovskẏ, J.; Grabner, G.; Appl. Catal., B 2006, 64, 290.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Mar 2015

History

• Received
  6 June 2014
• Accepted
  12 Dec 2014