Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Virtual communities of practice: do they work, where and why?

Abstracts

This paper highlights various results from a research on communities of practice in Canada, in particular the main conditions and challenges of such new modes of knowledge creation and management. It does this on the basis results to a questionnaire survey administered to the participants of these communities of practice. Participants’ commitment and motivation in the project, dynamism and continuity of leadership, organizational support and recognition of employees’ involvement appear to be the key elements. Some of these variables present interesting differences by age and by gender, and these will be adressed.


Este artigo apresenta resultados de uma pesquisa sobre comunidades de prática realizada no Canadá, abordando, em particular, as principais condições e desafios desse novo modo de criação e de gestão de conhecimento. O trabalho é realizado com base nos resultados de uma pesquisa survey, na qual foram aplicados questionários aos participantes de comunidades de prática. O comprometimento e a motivação dos participantes no projeto, o dinamismo e a continuidade da liderança, bem como o apoio e o reconhecimento organizacionais ao envolvimento dos empregados, revelam-se elementos-chave no processo. Algumas dessas variáveis apresentam diferenças por idade e gênero, as quais são exploradas no trabalho.


ARTIGOS

Virtual communities of practice: do they work, where and why?1 1 This research was conducted under the aegis of the Cefrio ( www.cefrio.qc.ca). It was conducted in partnership with colleagues from Université Laval, Université de Montréal and HEC Montréal (see Jacob et al., 2003, for information on the project’s participants). The organisational and HRM part of the research was conducted with Anne Bourhis, from HEC Montréal; we wish to thank Mireille Gaudreau, research assistant, for her excellent work on the statistics and Anne Bourhis for her cooperation in the project. Some of the data of the article are taken from Bourhis and Tremblay (2004).

Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay

Profª Télé-Université, Université du Québec

ABSTRACT

This paper highlights various results from a research on communities of practice in Canada, in particular the main conditions and challenges of such new modes of knowledge creation and management. It does this on the basis results to a questionnaire survey administered to the participants of these communities of practice. Participants’ commitment and motivation in the project, dynamism and continuity of leadership, organizational support and recognition of employees’ involvement appear to be the key elements. Some of these variables present interesting differences by age and by gender, and these will be adressed.

RESUMO

Este artigo apresenta resultados de uma pesquisa sobre comunidades de prática realizada no Canadá, abordando, em particular, as principais condições e desafios desse novo modo de criação e de gestão de conhecimento. O trabalho é realizado com base nos resultados de uma pesquisa survey, na qual foram aplicados questionários aos participantes de comunidades de prática. O comprometimento e a motivação dos participantes no projeto, o dinamismo e a continuidade da liderança, bem como o apoio e o reconhecimento organizacionais ao envolvimento dos empregados, revelam-se elementos-chave no processo. Algumas dessas variáveis apresentam diferenças por idade e gênero, as quais são exploradas no trabalho.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

References

BOURHIS, A.; TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2004). Les facteurs organisationnels de succès des communautés de pratique virtuelles. Québec : Cefrio. 140 p.

BROWN, J. S.; DUGUID, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, vol.2, n.1, p.40-57.

DAVEL, E.; TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2007). Formation et apprentissage organisationnel. La vitalité de la pratique. Québec : Télé-université/Presses de l’Université du Québec.

DE TERSSAC, G.; TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2000). Où va le temps de travail ? Toulouse : Editions Octares. 284 p.

GHERARDI, S.; NICOLINI, D. (2000). The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, vol.9, n.1, p.7-18.

HENRI, F.; LUNDGREN, K. (2001). L’apprentissage collaboratif : essai de définition, Québec: Presses de l’université du Québec.

HILDRETH, P.; KIMBLE, C.; WRIGHT, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 4, n. 1.

JACOB, R.; BAREIL, C.; BOURHIS, A.; DUBÉ, L; TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2003). Les communautés virtuelles de pratique : levier de l’organisation apprenante. In: Karnas, G., C. Vandenberghe and N. Delobbe (ed., 2003). Bien-être au travail et transformation des organisations. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology. Belgium: Presses Louvain. 181-192.

LAVE, J.; WENGER, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press.

MITCHELL, J. (2002) The potential for communities of practice. Australia: John Mitchell and associates. 102 p.

SWAN, J.; SCARBROUGH, H., ROBERTSON, M. (2002). The construction of communities of practice in the management of innovation. Management Learning, vol.33, n.4, p.477-496.

TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2005a). Virtual communities of practice : explaining different effects in two organizational contexts. Canadian Journal of Communication, vol. 30-3, p. 367-382.

TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2005b). Communities of practice: are the organizational conditions for implementation the same for a virtual multi-organization community ? Revista Organizações & Sociedade, n. 31 Salvador, Brésil. p. 25-39.

TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2003). Telework : a new mode of gendered segmentation ? Results from a study in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication, vol. 28, n. 4, p.461-478.

TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2002). Balancing work and family with telework? Organizational issues and challenges for women and managers. In: Women in management. Manchester: MCB Press. Volume 17, issue 3/4, p. 157-170. Also on www.teluq.uquebec.ca/chaireecosavoir.

WENGER, E. (1998). Communities of practice – Learning as a social system. Systems thinker. June.

WENGER, E., McDERMOTT R.; SNYDER, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

WENGER, E.; SNYDER, W. (2000). Communities of practice: the organisational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(0-1), 139-145.

  • BOURHIS, A.; TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2004). Les facteurs organisationnels de succès des communautés de pratique virtuelles. Québec : Cefrio. 140 p.
  • BROWN, J. S.; DUGUID, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, vol.2, n.1, p.40-57.
  • DE TERSSAC, G.; TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2000). Où va le temps de travail ? Toulouse : Editions Octares. 284 p.
  • GHERARDI, S.; NICOLINI, D. (2000). The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, vol.9, n.1, p.7-18.
  • HILDRETH, P.; KIMBLE, C.; WRIGHT, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 4, n. 1.
  • LAVE, J.; WENGER, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press.
  • MITCHELL, J. (2002) The potential for communities of practice. Australia: John Mitchell and associates. 102 p.
  • SWAN, J.; SCARBROUGH, H., ROBERTSON, M. (2002). The construction of communities of practice in the management of innovation. Management Learning, vol.33, n.4, p.477-496.
  • TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2005a). Virtual communities of practice : explaining different effects in two organizational contexts. Canadian Journal of Communication, vol. 30-3, p. 367-382.
  • TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2005b). Communities of practice: are the organizational conditions for implementation the same for a virtual multi-organization community ? Revista Organizações & Sociedade, n. 31 Salvador, Brésil. p. 25-39.
  • TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2003). Telework : a new mode of gendered segmentation ? Results from a study in Canada. Canadian Journal of Communication, vol. 28, n. 4, p.461-478.
  • TREMBLAY, D.-G. (2002). Balancing work and family with telework? Organizational issues and challenges for women and managers. In: Women in management. Manchester: MCB Press. Volume 17, issue 3/4, p. 157-170. Also on www.teluq.uquebec.ca/chaireecosavoir
  • WENGER, E., McDERMOTT R.; SNYDER, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • WENGER, E.; SNYDER, W. (2000). Communities of practice: the organisational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(0-1), 139-145.
  • 1
    This research was conducted under the aegis of the Cefrio (
    www.cefrio.qc.ca). It was conducted in partnership with colleagues from Université Laval, Université de Montréal and HEC Montréal (see Jacob et al., 2003, for information on the project’s participants). The organisational and HRM part of the research was conducted with Anne Bourhis, from HEC Montréal; we wish to thank Mireille Gaudreau, research assistant, for her excellent work on the statistics and Anne Bourhis for her cooperation in the project. Some of the data of the article are taken from Bourhis and Tremblay (2004).
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      22 Oct 2014
    • Date of issue
      Mar 2008
    Escola de Administração da Universidade Federal da Bahia Av. Reitor Miguel Calmon, s/n 3o. sala 29, 41110-903 Salvador-BA Brasil, Tel.: (55 71) 3283-7344, Fax.:(55 71) 3283-7667 - Salvador - BA - Brazil
    E-mail: revistaoes@ufba.br