Tecnologia, instrumentalidade e poder nas organizações

COLABORAÇÃO INTERNACIONAL

Tecnologia, instrumentalidade e poder nas organizações

Stewart R. Clegg

Professor do Departamento de Administração da Universidade de St. Andrews, Escócia

RESUMO

Derivadas de Maquiavel ou Hobbes, as teorias modernas de poder pressupõem que este emana da tecnologia. Conseqüentemente, elas prevêem que a adoção de novas tecnologias aumenta o controle de poder da administração e a marginalização da mão-de-obra. O presente artigo argumenta que o erro de tais previsões é inerente aos limites dessas teorias, à luz de Foucault; expõe os recentes debates sobre a especialização flexível; finalmente, conclui que mudanças nas técnicas de trabalho engedram resultados distintos. Afinal, tanto o poder quanto as empresas têm contigências complexas e interdependentes, e, até certo ponto, são passíveis de mudança.

Palavras-chave: Poder e tecnologia, especialização flexível, teorias modernas de poder, poder organizacional e novas tecnologias nas empresas.

ABSTRACT

Either Hobbessian or Machiavellian in their provenance, modern theories of power assume that all power flows through technology. Thus, they predict that the adoption of new technologies will increase control of power by organizations and marginalization by labor. This article argues that their error is inherent to the limits of these theories, according to Foucault; exposes the recent debates on flexible specialization; at last, it is argued that changes in work techniques have distinct results. After all, the contingencies of both power and organizations are complex, interdependent and, to a point, potentially capable of change.

Key words: Power and technology, flexible specialization, modern theories of power, organizational power and new technologies in organizations.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

Artigo recebido pela redação da RAE em janeiro/91, aprovado para publicação em março/91.

Tradução de Geni Garcia Golschmidt, revista por Vera Cecília Machline.

1. CLEGG, S.R. "Radtcal Revisions: power, discipline and organization", Organization studies. 10(1):97-115,1989.

2. LUKES, S. Power: A Radical view. Londres, MacMillan, 1974.

3. DAHL, R.A. ·Power·, in International Encyclopédia of the Social Sciences. Nova Iorque, Macmillan, pp.405-15,1968.

4. WOODWARD, J. Industrial Organization: behaviour and control. Londres, Oxford University Press, 1965.

5.HARVEY, E. "Technology and structure of organizations", American Sociological Review, 35 :247-59, 1968; ZWERMAN, W. New perspectives on organizational theory. Westport, Conn., Greenwood, 1970.

6. Como em: BLAU, P. M.; FALBE, C.M.; MCKINLEY, W. & TRACY, P.K. "Technology and organization in manufacturing", Administrative Science Quaterly. 21 :20-40, 1976; HICKSON, D.J.; PUGH,D.S. & PHEYSEY, D.C. "Operations Technology and Organization Structure: an empirical appraisal", Administrative Science Quarterly. 14: 378-97, 1969; PERROW, C. "A framework for the comparative analysls of complex organizations", American Sociological Review. 32:194-208, 1967; THOMPSON, J.D. Organizations in action. Nova Iorque, McGraw HiII, 1967; VAN DE VEN, A.H. & DELBECQ. "A task-contingent model of work-unit structure", Administrative Science Quarterly. 19:183-97,1974.

7. MARSH, R.M. & MANNARI, H. "Technology and size as determinants of the organizational structure of Japanese factories", Administrative Science Quarterly. 26(1 ):33-57, 1981; TAYEB, M. Organizations and national culture. Londres, Sage,1988.

8. WOODWARD, W. Op. cit.

9. JACQUES, E. The Changing culture of a factory. Londres, Tavistock,1951.

10. FOX, A. Beyond Contract work, power and trust relations. Londres, Faber and Faber, 1974.

11. ALDRICH, H.E. "Technology and organizational structure: a re-examination of the findings of the Aston Group", Administrative Science Quaterly. 17:26­42,1972.

12. TAYLOR, F.W. Principles of scientific management. Nova Iorque, Harper, 1911.

13. PARSONS, T. The Social system. Nova Iorque, Free Press, 1951.

14. DREYFUSS, C. Occupatian and idealagy of the salaried employee, tradução de E. Abramovitch. Nova Iorque, Basic Books, 1938.

15. WARNER, W.L. & LOW, L.O. The social system of the modem factory. Cambridge, Vale University Press, 1947.

16. DURKHEIM, D. The division of labour in saciety. Nova Iorque, Free Press, 1964.

17. BRAVEMAN, H. Labor and Monopoly Capital: the degradation of wark in the twentieth century. Nova Iorque, Monthly Review Press, 1974.

18. MARGLIN, S.A. "What do bosses do? - the origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production", Review of Radical Palitical Economics. 6: 60­112, 1974; STONE, K. "The origines of job structures in the steel industry", Reviews of Radical Palitical Economics. 6:113­74,1974.

19. Idem, ibidem; GORZ, A. "Technical intelligence and capitalist division of labour, Telos. 12:27-41,1972.

20. Idem, ibidem.

21. BRAVEMAN, H. Op. cit.

22. WATANABE, T. "New office technology and the labour process in contemporary Japanese banking", New teehnology, work and employment. 5(1 ):56-67, 1990.

23. LANE, C."Capitalism or culture? A comparative analysis of the position of the labour process and labour market of lower white-collar workers in the financial services sector of Britain and the Federal Republic of West Germany", Work employment and soeiety. 1 :57-84, 1987; PRICE, R. "Information consultation and the control of new technology", in HVMAN, R. & STREECK, W.(Org.) New technology and industrial relations. Blackwell, 1988.

24. KNIGHTS, D. & A. STURDY, M. "Women's work in insurance - information technology and the reproduction of gendered segregation", in DAVIDSON, M.J. & COOPER, C.L.(Org.) Women and information tecnnology. John Wiley and Sons, 1987.

25. BEYNON, H. Working for Ford. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1974.

26. NICHOLS, T. & BEYNON, H. Living with capitalism. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.

27. MARGLIN, S. A. Op. cit.

28. BRAVEMAN, H. Op. cit.

29. BURAWOY, M. "Towards a Marxist Theory of the Labour Process: Braverman and Beyond", Politics and society. 8:247-312, 1978.

30. CLEGG, S.R. "Organization and control", Administrative science quarterly. 26(4):545-62, 1981.

31. Ver os colaboradores do volume publicado por KNIGHTS, D. & WILMOTT, H. Labour process theory. Basingstoke, Mac­Millan Press, 1990.

32. STOREY, J., "The means of management control", Sociology. 19 (2): 193-212, 1985.

33. MARCUSE, H. One dimensional man. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964.

34. CLEGG, S.R. Frameworks of power. Londres, Sage, 1989.

35. STOREY, J. Op. cit.

36. BAUMAN, Z. Legislators and interpreters. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1987.

37. BAUMAN, Z. Op, cit., p.2.

38.GRAMSCI, A. Selection from tne prison notebooks. HOARE, Q. & SMITH, G.N.(Org. e trad.), Londres, Lawrence and Wishart, 1971.

39. LACLAU, E. & MOUFFE, C. Hegemony and socialist strategy. Londres, Verso, 1985.

40. FOUCAULT, M.The Archeology of knowledge. Londres, Tavistock, 1972. (Edição brasileira traduzida por NEVES, Luis Felipe Bada. A Arquelologia do saber. Petrópolis, Vozes)

41. LUKES, S. Op. cit.

42. ABERCROMBIE, N.S. & TURNER, B.S. The dominant ideology thesis. Londres, Allen & Unwin, 1980; CHAMBERLAIN, C.W. Class consciousness in Australia. Melbourne, Allen and Unwin, 1982.

43. LACLAU, E. & MOUFFE, C. Op. cit.

44. ANDERSON, P. Imagined Communities: reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. Londres, Verso, 1983.

45. CLEGG, S.R. Manufacturing Consent: changes in tne labor process under capitalism. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1979.

46. PARSONS, T. Op. cit.

47.CLEGG, S.R. Framework of power. Op. cit.

48. FOUCAUL T, M. The History of Sexuality: an introduction. Harmonsworth, Peregrine, 1984. (Edição brasileira traduzida em três volumes por ALBUQUERQUE, Maria T. da Costa & ALBUQUERQUE, J. A. História da sexualidade. Rio de Janeiro, Graal. )

49. WEEDON, C. Faminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxtord, Blackwell, 1987, p.123.

50. FOCAULT, M. The history of sexuality. Op. cit. p.92

51. GRAMSCI, A. Op. cit.

52. FOCAUL T, M. Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Brighton, Harvester Press, 1980. (Organização de GORDON, C. )

53. BRAVEMAN, H. Op. cit.; MARGLIN, S.A. Op. cit.

54. WEBER, M. From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1948. (Tradução e organização de GERTH, H. H. & MILL, C.W. )

55. CLEGG, S.R.; BORENHAM, P. & DOW G. Class, politics and the economy. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986; O'NEILL, J. "The Disciplinary society: from Weber to Foucault", British Journal of Sociology. 37(1 ):42-60, 1987.

56. CLEGG, S. R. & DUNKERLY, D. Organization, class and control. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.

57. MARGLIN, S.A. Op. cit.; STONE, K. Op. cit.

58. RUESCHEMEYER, D. Power and the division of labour. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1986.

59. THOMPSON, J. D. Op. cit.

60. KEISER, A."From Asceticism to Administration of Wealth: medieval monasteries and the pitfalls of rationalization", Organization Studies, 8(2):103-24, 1987.

61. CLEGG, S. R. & DUNKERLY, D. Op. cit.

62. O'NEILL, J. Op. cit.

63. LASLETI, P. The world we have lost. Londres, Methuen, 1965, WALL, R.; ROBIN, J. & LASLETI, P.(Org.) Family forms in historie Europe. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983.

64. LANDES, S. The Unbound Prometheus: technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1969; MARGLIN, S.A. Op. cit.

65. O'NEILL, J. Op. cit.

66. SMELSER, N. Social change in the industrial revolution. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1959.

67. BURAWOY, M. "Towards a Marxist Theory of the Labour Process: Braverman and Beyond", Politics and Society. Op. cit.; CLAWSON, D. Bureaucracy and the Labor Process: the transformation of U. S. industry 1860-1920. Nova Iorque, Monthly Review Press, 1980; EDWARDS, R. Contested Terrain: the transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. Nova Iorque, Basic Books, 1979; LITTLER,C.R. The development of the labour process in capital societies. Londres, Heinemann Educational Books, 1982.

68. CLEGG, S. R. & DUNKERLY, D. Op. cit.

69. GRAMSCI, A. Op. cit.

70. WEBER, M. Op. cit.

71. ARMSTRONG, P."Management Control Strategies and Inter-professional Competition: the cases of accountancy and personnel management". In KNIGHTS, D. & WILMONTT, H. Managing the Labour Process. Aldershot, Gower, capítulo 2, 1986.

72. STOREY, J. Op. cit.

73.CLEGG, S.R. Radical Revisions: power, discipline and organization. Op. cit.

74. GLEGG, S.R, "Organization and Control", Administrative Science Quarterly. Op. cit.

75. COCH, L. & FRENCH, J.T.P. "Overcoming resistance to change", Human relations. 1:512-32,1948.

76. HICKSON, D.J.; HININGS, C.R.; LEE, C.A.; SCHNECK, R.E. & PENNINGS, J.M. "A strategic contingencies theory of intra-organizational power", Administrative Science Quarterly. 16:216­29, 1971; 19(1 ):22-44.

77. BARNES, B. "On Authority and its Relationship to Power", in LAW, J. (Org.) Power, Action and Belief: a new sociology of knowledge? Londres, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Sociological Review Monograph 32. pp.180-95, 1986.

78. CLEGG, S.R. Power, Rule and Domination: a critical and empirical understanding of power in sociological theory and organizational life. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.

79. BARNES, B. "On authority and its relationship to power". Op. cit.; CLEGG, S.R. Power, Rule and Domination: a critical and empirical understanding of power in sociological theory and organizational life. Op. cit.; GARFINKEL, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice Hall, 1967; WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophical Investigatians. Oxford, Blackwell, 1968. (Tradução de ASCOMBE, G.E. );

80. BARNES, B. The nature of power. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1988.

81. CLEGG, S.R. Modem organizations, organization studies in the modem world. Londres, Sage, 1990.

82. MILLS, C.W. "Situated Actions and vocabularies of Motive", American Sociological Review. V:904-13, 1940.

83. PIORE, M.J.& SABE L, C.F. The Second Industrial Divide: possibilities for prosperity, Nova Iorque, Basic Books, 1984.

84. SMITH, C. "Flexible specialization, automation and mass production", Work, Employment and Saciety. 3(2):203-20, 1989.

85. SABEL, C.F. Work and politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982.

86. PIORE, M.J.& SABEL, C.F. Op. cit.

87. BELL, D. The Coming of Post Industrial Saciety. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1974.

88. KATZ, H.C. & SABEL, C.F. "Industrial relations and industrial adjustments in the car industry", Industrial Relations. 24(2): 295-315, 1985

89. SMITH, C. Op. cit.

90.POLLERT, A. "Dismantling Flexibility", Capital and Class. 34(1 ):42-75, 1988.

91. CROSS, M. Towards the Flexible Craftsman. Londres, Technical Change Centre, 1985.

92. LEVER-TRACY, C. "The Flexibility Debate: part time work", Labour and Industry. 1(2):210-241, 1988.

93. BLAUNER, R. Alienation and freedom. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1964.

94. CHILD, J. "Strategies of control and organization behaviour", Administrative Science Quarterly. 18:1-17,1973.

95. ARGYRIS, C. The applicability of organizational sociology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1972.

96. PALLOIX, C. "The Labour Process: from Fordism to Neo­Fordism", in The labour process and class struggle. Londres, Stage 1, pp. 46-67, 1976

97. PIORE, M. & SABEL, C.F. Op. cit.

98. CORIAT, B. "The Restructuring of the Assembly Line: a new economy of time and control", Capital and Class. 11: 34­43,1980.

99. AGLIETTA, M.A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. Londres, New Left Books, 1979.

100. WILLIAMS, K.; CUTLER, A.; WILLIAMS, J. & HASLAM, C. "The end of mass production?", Economy and society. 16(3):405-39, 1987; BRAMBLE, T. "The Flexibility Debate: industrial relations and new management production practices". Labour and Industry, 1(2):187­109, 1988; HYMAN, R. "Flexible Specialization: miracle or myth?", in HYMAN, R. & STREECK, W.(Org.). Trade unions, technology and industrial democracy. Oxford, Blackwell, pp.48­60, 1988; POLLERT, A. Op. cit.

101. CRESSEY, P. Participation Review. Luxemburgo, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 1987; DANIEL, W. Work­place industrial relations and technical change. Prances Pinter, 1987; DEERY, S. "Determinants of trade union influence over technological change", New Technology and Employment, 4(2): 117-130, 1989; DOGSON, M. & MARTIN, R. "Trade Union Politics on New Technology, facing the challenge of the 1980's", New Technology. Work and Employment. 2(1), 1987; WILLMAN, P. "New Technology and Industrial Relations: a review of the literature". Department of Employment, 1986.

102. DEERY, S. "Determinants of trade union influence over technological change". New Technology and Employment. 4(2): 117-130, 1989.

103. CRESSEY, P. "The Restructuring of the Assembly Une: a new economy of time and control". Capital and Class. 11:34­43.

104. BANSLER, J. "Trade unions and alternative technology in Scandinavia". New Technology, Work and Employment. 2: 92­98, outono 1989.

105. WILSON, D.; BUTLER, R.; CRAY, D.; HICKSON, D. & MALLORY, G. "The limits of trade union power in organizational decision making". British Journal of Industrial Relations. 20(3), 1983.

106. MANWARING, T. ''The trade union response to new technology". Industrial Relations Journal. 12(4), julho 1981.

107. MOORE, R. & LEVIE, H. "New technology and the unions", in FORESTER, T.(Org.) The Information Technology Revolution. Blackwell, 1985.

108. CRESSEY, P.; ELDRIDGE, J.; McINNES, J. & NORRIS, G. Industrial Democracy and Participation: a scottish survey. Research Paper nº 28, Department of Employment, 1981.

109. EDWARDS, P. K. Op. cit.

110. POLLERT, A. Op. cit.

111.SHAIKEN, H.; HERZENBERG, S. & KUHN,S. "The work process under more flexible production", Industrial Relations. 25(2):167-83,1986.

112. BRAMBLE, T. Op. Cit.

113. PIORE, M.J. Z& SABEL, C.F. Op. cit.

114. BADHAM, R. & MATTHEWS, J. "The production systerns debate". Labour and Industry. 2(2):194-246,1989.

115. CHILD, J. & TAYEB, M.H. "Theoretical perspectives in cross-national organization research", International Studies of Management and Organization. pp.23-70, 1983.

116. JAIKUMAR, R. "Postindustrial manufacturing". Harvard Business Review. 64(6):69-76, 1986.

117. KENNEY, M. & FLORIDA, R. "Beyond Mass Production: Production and the Labor Process in Japan". Politics and Society. 16(1 ):121-58, 1988.

118. CHILD, J. "Information technology, organization and the response to strategy challenge". Trabalho apresentado na sessão de abertura do 8º Colóquio do EGOS (European Group of Organization Studies), Antuérpia, julho 1987.

119. BADHAM, R. & MATTHEWS. J. Op. cit.

120. SHAIKEN. H.; HERZENBERG. S. & KUHN. S. Op. cit.

121. Ver JAIKUMAR, R. Op. cit.

122. KENNEY, M. & FLORIDA, R. Op. cit.

123. BADHAM, R. & MATTHEWS, J. Op. Cit.

124. SORGE, A; HARTMANN, G.; WARNER, M. & NICHOLS, I. Microelectronics and Manpower in Manufacturing. Aldershot, Gower, 1983.

125. SORGE, A. et alii. Op. cit., p.26.

126. KERN, H. & SCHUMAN, M. Das Ende der Arbetsleiung? Rationalisiering in der Industriellen Produktion. Munique, Verlag C. H. Beck, 1984.

127. KERN, H. & SCHUMAN, M. Idem, ibidem; CAMPBELL, I. "New production concepts? ­The West German debates on restructuring", Labour and Industry. 2(2):247-280, 1989; HOSS, D. "Technology and work in the two Germanies", in GROOTING, (Org.) Technology and Work East-West comparisons. Londres, Croom Helm, pp.231-72, 1986; LLITEK, W. & HEISSIG, U. "Work Organization Under Technological change: sources of differentiation and the reproduction of social inequality in processes of change", in CLEGG, S.R.(Org.) Organization Theory and Class Analysis: new approaches and new issues. Berlin, De Gruyter, pp.289­314,1989.

128. MAURICE, M.; SORGE, A. & WARNER, M. "Societal Differences in Organizing Manufacturing Units: a comparion of France, West Germany and Great Britain". Organization Studies, 1(1):59-86,1980. SORGE, A. & STREECK, W. "lndustrial Relations and Technical Change: the case for an extended perspective", In HYMAN, R. & STREEK, W.(Org.) New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford, Blackwell, pp.19-47, 1988; LANE, C. "Industrial Change in Europe: the pursuit of flexible specialization in Britain and West Germany", Work, Employment and Society. 2(2):141-68, 1988.

129. KERN, H. & SCHUMANN, M. Op. cit.

130.CAMPBELL, I. Op. Cit.

131.PIORE, M.J. & SABE L, C.F. Op. cit.

132.CAMPBELL, I. Op. cit.

133.KERN, H. & CHUMANN, M. Op. cit.

134. BOREHAM, P.; CLEGG, S.R. & DOW, G. "The Institutional Management of politics: beyond and labour process and corporatist debates", in KNIGHTS, D. & WILLMOTT, H. (Org.) Managing the Labour Process. Aldershot, Gower, pp.186-210, 1986.

135. CLEGG, S.R. Power, Rule and Domination: a critical and empirical understanding of power in sociological theory and organizational life. Op. cit.

136. KERN, H. & CHUMANN, M. Op. cit.

137.CAMPBELL, I. Op. Cit. p.261.

138.CAMPBELL, I. Op. Cit. p.273.

139.KERN, H. & CHUMANN, M. Op. cit.

140. BADHAM, R. & MATTHEWS, J. Op. cit.

141. CHILD, J. "Information technology, organization and the response to strategy challenge". Op. cit.; PERROW, C. Organizational Analysis: a sociological review.. Londres, Tavistock Publications, 1971. SORGE, A. & STREECK, W. Op. cít,

142. FOX, A. Op. cit.

143. CLEGG, S.R. & DUNKERL Y, D. Op. cit. Cap. 9.

144. Ver CLEGG, S.R.; BOREHAM, P. & DOW, G. Op. cit. Cap.9.

145. KAPLINSKY, R. Automation: The technology and society. Londres, Longman, 1984.

146. BADHAM, R. & MATTHEWS, J. Op. cit. p.209.

147. PEREZ, C. "Microelectronics, Long Waves and World Structural Changes: new perspectives for developing countries", World Development. 13(3):441­63,1985.

148. FOX, A. Op. cit.

149. POLLERT, A. Op. cit.

150. BADHAM, R. & MATTHEWS, J. Op. cit. p.208.

151. BUCHANAN, D.A "Using the New Technology: management objectives and organization choices". European Management Journal. 1:70-79, 1982; BURNES, B. "Factors affecting the introduction and use of computer numeric controlled machine tools". Trabalho apresentado no Internation Conference on Human Factors in Manufacturing, Londres, 3 a 5 de abril 1984; SHAIKEN, H. et alii. Op. cit.; WILKINSON, R. The shopfloor politics of new technology, Londres, Heinmann, 1983.

152. PERROW, C. Op. cit.

153.TOWILL, D.R. "A production engineering approach to robot selection", Omega. 12(3):261-272,1984.

154. BUCHANAN, D.A. Idem, ibidem; BURNES, B. Idem, ibidem; NOBLE, D.F. "Social Choice in Machine Design: the case of automatically controlled machine tools", in ZIMBALIST, A.(Org.) Case studies in the labor process. Nova Iorque, Monthly Review Press, 1979.

155. WILSON, F.M. & BUCHANAN, D.A. "The Effect of New Technology in the Engineering Industry: cases of control and constraint", Work, Employment and Society. 2(3):366-380, 1988.

156. HYMAN, R. Op. cit. pp.48­60.

157. WATANABE, T. Op. cit.

158.JONES, W. "Quality's vicious circles", Management Today. pp. 97-103, março 1983.

159. WILSON, F.M. Productive efticiency and the employment relationship - the case of quality circles", Emplayee Relations. 11(1):27-32, 1989.

160. SCHONBERGER, R. Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: nine hidden lessan in simplicity. Nova Iorque, Free Press, 1983.

161. SHAIKEN, H.; HERZENBERG, H. & KUHNS, S. Op. cit.

162. BRAMBLE, T. Op. cit.

163. MARCHINGTON, M. Managing industrial relatians. Maidenhead, McGraw Hill, 1982.

164. RAMSAY, H. "Cycles of control, worker participation in sociological and historical perspectives". Sociology, 2, 1977.

165. CRESSEY, P. & McINNES, J. "The recession and industrial relations". Trabalho apresentado na Conferência do ESRC, University of Warwick, e citado em MARCHINGTON, M. & ARMSTRONG, R. "The nature of the new joint consultation", Industrial Relations Jaurnal. 17, verão de 1986/1985.

166. THOMPSON, J.D. Organizations in Action. Nova Iorque, McGraw-Hill,1967.

167. CLEGG, S.R. Organization and control. Op. cit.

168. CLEGG, S.R. Modern organizations. Op. cit.

Datas de Publicação

• Publicação nesta coleção
  13 Jun 2013
• Data do Fascículo
  Dez 1992

Histórico

• Aceito
  Mar 1991
• Recebido
  Jan 1991