Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The rights approach to local public management: experiences from Brazil

Abstracts

The Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, Public Management and Citizenship Program was set up in 1996 with Ford Foundation support to identify and disseminate Brazilian subnational government initiatives in service provision that have a direct effect on citizenship. Already, the program has 2,500 different experiences in its data bank, the results of four annual cycles. The article draws some initial conclusions about the possibilities of a rights-based approach to public management and about the engagement of other agencies and civil society organizations.

Innovation; subnational government; public administration; citizenship; decentralization


O Programa Gestão Pública e Cidadania da Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, foi criado em 1996 com o apoio da Fundação Ford para identificar e disseminar iniciativas inovadoras na prestação de serviços por governos subnacionais brasileiros com um impacto direto na construção da cidadania. Nos seus primeiros quatro anos, o programa acumula mais de 2.500 experiências diferentes no seu banco de dados. As conclusões iniciais apontam para uma nova abordagem sobre administração pública centrada nos direitos individuais e coletivos e para a importância do envolvimento de outras agências públicas e organizações da sociedade civil no processo de construção de caminhos viáveis.

Inovação; governo subnacional; administração pública; cidadania; descentralização


ADMINISTRAÇÃO PÚBLICA

The rights approach to local public management: experiences from Brazil

Peter Spink

Professor of the Department of Administration and Human Resources at EAESP/FGV and Coordinator of the Public Management and Citizenship Program. E-mail: spink@fgvsp.br

ABSTRACT

The Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, Public Management and Citizenship Program was set up in 1996 with Ford Foundation support to identify and disseminate Brazilian subnational government initiatives in service provision that have a direct effect on citizenship. Already, the program has 2,500 different experiences in its data bank, the results of four annual cycles. The article draws some initial conclusions about the possibilities of a rights-based approach to public management and about the engagement of other agencies and civil society organizations.

Key words: Innovation, subnational government, public administration, citizenship, decentralization.

RESUMO

O Programa Gestão Pública e Cidadania da Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, foi criado em 1996 com o apoio da Fundação Ford para identificar e disseminar iniciativas inovadoras na prestação de serviços por governos subnacionais brasileiros com um impacto direto na construção da cidadania. Nos seus primeiros quatro anos, o programa acumula mais de 2.500 experiências diferentes no seu banco de dados. As conclusões iniciais apontam para uma nova abordagem sobre administração pública centrada nos direitos individuais e coletivos e para a importância do envolvimento de outras agências públicas e organizações da sociedade civil no processo de construção de caminhos viáveis.

Palavras-chave: Inovação, governo subnacional, administração pública, cidadania, descentralização.

Full text available only in PDF format.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

NOTES

Paper presented at XXII International Congress of LASA, Latin American Studies Association, Miami, Florida, March 16-18th, 2000.

1. The Public Management and Citizenship Program is essentially a collective endeavour and many thanks are due to my co-director, Marta Ferreira Santos Farah, Ilka Camarotti, coordinator of the special project on Poverty, and to the program staff which include many FGV postgraduates, which are very capably led by Viviane Novell Ails: Fabian Paschal Cinches, Fernando Martinez de Oliver, Hello Batiste Barbs, Juliana Maria Paris Spink, Luis Mario Fujiwara, Maria Beaters de Araújo Asperti, Marlei de Oliveira, Nelson Luiz Nouvel Alessio, Patricia Laczynski, Ricardo Ernesto Vasquez Beltrão.

2. Ford Foundation members Bradford Smith, Elizabeth Leeds, Michael Lipsky and Nigel Brooke have been a constant source of encouragement and ideas as have many other members of the Ford Governance and Civil Society network. Since 1997, they have been joined by Beatriz Azeredo and Marta Prochnik from the BNDES.

3. Taken from the program regulations. A full description of the program, application forms, regulations and all material generated can be found on its website (http://inovando.fgvsp.br) or by post at Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Av. 9 de Julho, 2029, Bela Vista, São Paulo (SP), CEP 01313-902, Brazil. Telephone: 55-11-281-7904 – fax: 55-11-287-5095 – e-mail: inovando@fgvsp.br.

4. By listed order of institution: José Carlos Gomes de Pinho, Humberto Marques Filho, Luis Roque Klering, Fernando Guilherme Tenorio, Laura da Veiga, Edna Ramos de Castro, Silvio Caccia Bava, Pedro Jacobi, Nancy Cardia, Thereza Lobo, Marlene Libardoni, Grazia di Grazia and Jorge Terena. A key role in the earlier years was played by Ailton Krenak of the Nucleus for Indigenous Culture.

5. Centre of Latin American Studies (Cambridge and the Brazil Center), University of Texas (Austin).

6. At least 1 year of effective operation and coordinated by a subnational public sector agency or indigenous peoples own government.

7. A full list of all publications and technical notes is available on the web page, most of which can be downloaded and other ordered directly from the program office.

8. See the various papers brought together in Bresser Pereira and Spink (1999).

9. See Evans (1995) for a critical discussion in relation to Central America.

10. For a specific discussion of the non-profit sector, see Smith and Lipsky (1993).

11. See the various countries in the studies organized by Clarke and Pitelis (1993).

12. See Refounding Democratic Public Administration organized by Wamsley and Wolf (1996).

13. Here the works of Friedmann (1992) and Sen (1992) are of extreme importance.

14. See the preliminary work of the Division for Democratic Governance, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) (1998).

15. See recent discussions in Latin America by Botero (1997), Grau (1997), Hopenhayn (1997) and Pinho (1998). 16. This is the broad definition provided by Rosenau (1995), see also March and Olsen (1995).

17. The anxiety grew to alarming levels as the deadline for entries approached – as indeed it continues to do year after year. But, true to Brazilian tradition, all the entrants arrived at the last minute, flooding out the FGV mail system and blocking its switchboard.

18. Special thanks to Ricardo Ernesto Vasquez Beltrão, Patrícia Laczynski, Roberta Clemente, Rosane Keppke, Fernanda Martinez de Oliveira and José Luis Abreu Dutra for the various tables in this section.

19. A reminder that all material generated within the program is available for downloading from the program’s website or can be obtained in printed versions from the program office.

20. Data analyzed by Fernanda Martinez de Oliveira and José Luiz Abreu Dutra.

21. For a fuller description, see Camarotti and Spink (1999, 2000).

22. Research undertaken with Roberta Clemente and Rosane Keppke.

23. Carried out by Ricardo Beltrão.

24. For example, Carroll (1992), Lemaresquier (1980), Smillie and Helmich (1993).

25. For a good discussion on Latin America, see Bebbington (1997).

26. See the study by Tenorio (1997) on the 1996 entrants.

  • AUCOIN, P. Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums. Governance, v. 3, n. 2, p. 115-137, 1990.
  • BAUMAN, Z. Globalization: the human consequences. Cambridge : Polity Press, 1998.
  • BEBBINGTON, A. New states, new NGOs? Crisis and transition among rural development NGOs in the Andean region. World Development, v. 25, n. 11, p. 1755-1765, 1997.
  • BOTERO, D. I. R. Relaciones Estado-sociedad civil en el campo social. Una reflexión desde el caso colombiano. Reforma y Democracia, v. 7, p. 127-154, 1997.
  • BOX, R. C. et al. New public management and faux democracy Omaha : University of Nebraska, 1999. Mimeo.
  • BRESSER PEREIRA, L. C., SPINK, P. K. (Orgs.). Reforming the state: managerial public administration in Latin America. Boulder : Lynne Rienner, 1999.
  • BURCHELL, G., GORDON, C., MILLER, P. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1991.
  • CAMAROTTI, I., SPINK, P. K. Estratégias locais para redução da pobreza: construindo a cidadania. São Paulo : Programa Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 1999. Documento Síntese.
  • CAMAROTTI, I., SPINK, P. K. Parcerias e pobreza: soluções locais na construção de relações socioeconômicas. Rio de Janeiro : Editora da Fundação Getulio Vargas, 2000.
  • CARROLL, T. F. Intermediary NGOs: the supporting link in grassroots development. West Hartford, CT : Kumarian Press, 1992.
  • CENTRO LATINOAMERICANO DE ADMINISTRACIÓN PARA EL DESARROLLO (CLAD). Una nueva gestión pública para América Latina Caracas : CLAD, 1998.
  • CLARKE, T., PITELIS, C. (Eds.). The political economy of privatization London : Routledge, 1993.
  • EVANS, T. (Org.). La transformacíon neoliberal del sector público Managua : Latino Editores, 1995.
  • FARAH, M. F. S. Gestão pública e cidadania: iniciativas inovadoras na administração subnacional no Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 31, n. 4, p. 126- 156, 1997.
  • FARAH, M. F. S. Parcerias, novos arranjos institucionais e políticas locais. In: FUNDAÇÃO PREFEITO FARIA LIMA CEPAM (Org.). O município no século XXI: cenários e perspectivas. São Paulo : CEPAM, 1999.
  • FIGUEIREDO, R., LAMOUNIER, B. (Orgs.). As cidades que dão certo São Paulo : M.H.Communicação, 1996.
  • FRIEDMANN, J. Empowerment: the politics of alternative development. Oxford : Blackwell, 1992.
  • GEERTZ, C. Local knowledge. New York : Basic Books, 1983.
  • GRAU, N. C. Repensando lo público através de la sociedad: nuevas formas de gestión pública y representación social. Caracas : Editorial Nueva Sociedad/CLAD, 1997.
  • HABERMAS, J. The theory of communicative action Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1984. v. I & II.
  • HABERMAS, J. The structural transformation of the public sphere Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1989.
  • HABERMAS, J. Between facts and norms Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1996.
  • HIRSCHMAN, A. O. Exit, voice and loyalty Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1970.
  • HOPENHAYN, M. Recomposición de actores en programas sociales: consideraciones desde la experiencia latinoamericana. Reforma y Democracia, v. 7, p. 63-82, 1997.
  • KEANE, J. Democracy and civil society London : Verso, 1988.
  • KLIKSBERG, B. The necessary state: a strategic agenda for discussion. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 60, p. 183-196, 1994.
  • KLIKSBERG, B. Desigualdade y desarrollo en América Latina : el debate postergado. Reforma y Democracia, v. 14, p. 7-58, 1999.
  • LEMARESQUIER, T. Beyond infant feeding: the case for another relationship between NGOs and the United Nations System. Development Dialogue, v. 1, p. 120- 125, 1980.
  • LESBAUPIN, I. (Org.). Prefeituras do povo e para o povo São Paulo : Edições Loyola, 1996.
  • MARCH, J. G., OLSEN, J. P. Democratic governance New York : The Free Press, 1995.
  • McGREW, A. (Org.). The transformation of democracy Cambridge : Polity Press/Open University Press, 1997.
  • NICKSON, R. A. Local government in Latin America Boulder : Lynne Rienner, 1995.
  • NOGUEIRA, H. (Org). Experiências inovadoras de gestão municipal São Paulo : Polis, 1992.
  • ODONNEL, G. Poliarquias e a (in)efetividade da lei na América Latina. Novos Estudos CEBRAPE, v. 51, p. 37- 61, 1998.
  • PINHO, J. A. G. Reforma do aparelho do Estado : limites do gerencialismo frente ao patrimonialismo. Organizações e Sociedade, v. 5, n. 12, p. 59-80, 1998.
  • PUTNAM, R. D. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1993.
  • ROSENAU, J. N. Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, v. 1, n. 1, p. 13-43, 1995.
  • SCHUURMAN, F. J. The decentralization discourse: post-fordist paradigm or neo-liberal cul-de-sac? European Journal of Development Research, v. 9, n. 1, p. 150-166, 1997.
  • SEN, A. Inequality re-examined Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1992.
  • SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY (SIDA). Helping governments work: a rights approach to public administration and the development and improvement of the capacity of public services Stockholm : Division for Democratic Governance, 1998. Preliminary Document.
  • SMILLIE, I., HELMICH, H. Non governmental organizations and governments: stakeholders for development. Paris : OECD, 1993.
  • SMITH, B. C. Decentralization: the territorial dimension of the state. London : George Allen and Unwin, 1985.
  • SMITH, B. C. Bureaucracy and political power Brighton : Wheatsheaf Books, 1988.
  • SMITH, S. R., LIPSKY, M. Nonprofits for hire : the welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1993.
  • SOUZA, C. Redemocratization and decentralization in Brazil: the strength of the member states. Development and Change, v. 27, n. 3, p. 529-555, 1996.
  • SPINK, P. K. Decentralização: luto ou luta. In: FISCHER,T. (Ed.). Poder local: governo e cidadania. Rio de Janeiro : Fundação Getulio Vargas, 1993.
  • TENDLER, J. Good governance in the tropics Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Press, 1997.
  • TENORIO, F. Gestão pública e cidadania: metodologias participativas em ação. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 31, n. 4, p. 101-125, 1997.
  • WAMSLEY, G. L., WOLF, J. E. Refounding democratic public administration: modern paradoxes, postmodern challenges. Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, 1996.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    23 Sept 2011
  • Date of issue
    Sept 2000
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de S.Paulo Av 9 de Julho, 2029, 01313-902 S. Paulo - SP Brasil, Tel.: (55 11) 3799-7999, Fax: (55 11) 3799-7871 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rae@fgv.br