BACKGROUND: The long-term safety and efficacy of paclitaxeleluting stents (PES) remains debated for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHOD: To evaluate the performance of PES in patients with AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 60 patients were subjected to a matched analysis comparing PES stent (TaxusTM) with an analogous bare metal stent (Express II TM) control group. Matching parameters included stent length and diameter, and diabetes mellitus. Major adverse cardiac events were evaluated during follow up. Late angiographic restudy was obtained for all patients. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluation was performed in PES group. RESULTS: Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between PES and control groups. After a mean follow-up of 24.9 ± 5.3 months, there was 1 target lesion revascularization (TLR) in the PES group (re-stenting) and 1 non cardiac death, 1 re-AMI and 6 TLR (2 surgical revascularizations and 4 re-PCI) in the control group. Patients of PES group had a lower risk of repeat revascularization (3.3 vs. 23.3%; p = 0.02). At angiographic restudy 8.7 ± 3.1 months after index procedure, angiographic late loss was 0.21 ± 0.29 vs. 0.60 ± 0.76 mm (p = 0.01) and the binary reestenosis rate was 3.3 vs. 33.3% (p = 0.002) in the PES vs. control groups respectively. At IVUS evaluation, average percent in-stent neointimal obstruction of PES group was 4.7 ± 6.8%. Stent malapposition was observed in 8 patients (34.8%). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel-eluting stents (TaxusTM) appeared safe and effective in patients with acute myocardial infarction at a two-year period follow-up.
Myocardial infarction; Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary; Contenedores; Paclitaxel; Safety; Coronary restenosis
