Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Resultados de Marketing de Relacionamento: proposição de modelo por meio de mapeamento cognitivo

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Buscou-se desenvolver um modelo cognitivo que expressasse como profissionais de marketing entendem as relações entre constructos que definem a atividade de marketing de relacionamento (MR) e, com base no modelo obtido, entender como são alcançados os objetivos nesta área.

Método:

Por meio de mapeamento cognitivo foram traçados 35 mapas mentais individuais que apontam como cada entrevistado entende as interações entre os elementos de MR. Com base nas visões destes indivíduos, foi construído um mapa mental agregado.

Fundamentação teórica:

O tema é tratado a partir de revisão teórica que explora o conceito de MR e seus principais elementos. Desta revisão foram listados onze constructos principais.

Resultados:

Traçou-se um modelo sistêmico que representa a atividade de MR. A análise do modelo permitiu identificar CLV como o resultado final da atividade de MR. Percebeu-se também que a maior parte dos elementos de MR tem seu impacto em CLV intermediado pela fidelidade. Personalização e qualidade se mostraram elementos de entrada do processo e são aqueles que mais fortemente impactam outros. Por fim, destaca-se que elementos de punição ao cliente são muito menos efetivos que de benefício.

Contribuições:

O modelo desenvolvido foi capaz de inserir elementos centrais de MR, mas ausentes da maioria dos modelos formais: CLV e personalização. As analises permitiram compreender as interações entre os elementos de MR e como se dá a formação de seu resultado final: CLV. Essa compreensão aprimora o conhecimento sobre o tema e auxilia que ações sejam norteadas, avaliadas e corrigidas.

Palavras-chave:
Marketing de relacionamento; Customer Lifetime Value (CLV); Mapeamento cognitivo

RESUMO

Objetivo:

This research sought to develop a cognitive model that expresses how marketing professionals understand the relationship between the constructs that define relationship marketing (RM). It also tried to understand, using the obtained model, how objectives in this field are achieved.

Método:

Through cognitive mapping, we traced 35 individual mental maps, highlighting how each respondent understands the interactions between RM elements. Based on the views of these individuals, we established an aggregate mental map.

Fundamentação teórica:

The topic is based on a literature review that explores the RM concept and its main elements. Based on this review, we listed eleven main constructs.

Resultados:

We established an aggregate mental map that represents the RM structural model. Model analysis identified that CLV is understood as the final result of RM. We also observed that the impact of most of the RM elements on CLV is brokered by loyalty. Personalization and quality, on the other hand, proved to be process input elements, and are the ones that most strongly impact others. Finally, we highlight that elements that punish customers are much less effective than elements that benefit them.

Contribuições:

The model was able to insert core elements of RM, but absent from most formal models: CLV and customization. The analysis allowed us to understand the interactions between the RM elements and how the end result of RM (CLV) is formed. This understanding improves knowledge on the subject and helps guide, assess and correct actions.

Palavras-chave:
Relationship Marketing; Customer Lifetime Value (CLV); Cognitive mapping

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

REFERÊNCIAS

  • Andersen, D., & Richardson, G. (1997). Scripts for group model building. System Dynamics Review, 13(4), 107-129.
  • Anderson, E. W., & Mittal, V. (2000). Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 107-120.
  • Ball, D., Coelho, P. S., & Machás, A. (2004). The role of communication and trust in explaining customer loyalty: An extension to the ECSI model. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1272-1293.
  • Ball, D., Coelho, P. S., & Vilares, M. J. (2006). Service personalization and loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(6), 391-403.
  • Baptista, P. P. (2005) Lealdade do consumidor e os seus antecedentes: Um estudo aplicado ao setor varejista na internet (Tese de doutorado). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Bastos, A. V. (2002). Mapas cognitivos e a pesquisa organizacional: Explorando aspectos metodológicos. Estudos de Psicologia, 7, 65-77.
  • Berger, P. D., & Nasr, N. I. (1998). Customer lifetime value: Marketing models and applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 17-30.
  • Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services-growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245.
  • Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. (2005). Ancom- 2: A support tool for collective decisions based on causal mapping. Cahier de Recherche Cerebem: Centre de Recherché de Bordeaux Ecole de Management, 5(87).
  • Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. (2007). The Ancom-2 solution to support knowledge work. International Business Management, 1(2), 12-19.
  • Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., Durrieu, F., & Mandják, T. (2001) Application of causal mapping methodology to measure business relationship value. Euro-Gdss Annual Worksho, La Rochelle, França.
  • Brei, V. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2005). Confiança, valor percebido e lealdade em trocas relacionais de serviço: Um estudo com usuários de internet banking no Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 9(2), 145-168.
  • Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109-126.
  • Caruana, A. (2004). The impact of switching costs on customer loyalty: A study among corporate customers of mobile telephony. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 12(3), 256-268.
  • Clarkson, G. P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2005). Introducing Cognizer™: A comprehensive computer package for the elicitation and analysis of cause maps. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 317-341.
  • Crescitelli, E., & Figueiredo, J. (2010). Uso de diagramas causais na construção de um modelo de brand equity Florianópolis/SC: EMA.
  • Eden, C. (1988). Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research, 36(1), 1-13.
  • Edvardsson, B., Johnson, M. D., Gustafsson, A., & Strandvik, T. (2000). The effects of satisfaction and loyalty on profits and growth: Products versus services. Total Quality Management, 11(7), 917-927.
  • Ensslin, L., & Montibeller, N. (1999). Inferência causal em mapas cognitivos Rio de Janeiro: ENEGEP.
  • Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. The Journal of Marketing, 60, 7-18.
  • Fullerton, G. (2005). How commitment both enables and undermines marketing relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 39(11/12), 1372-1388.
  • Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70-87.
  • Goldberg, J. (1996). The distrat/askmap suite of programs for cause map analysis A user’s guide. Unpublished manuscript United Kingdom: Cranfield University Computer Centre. Recuperado de http://goldmark.org/jeff/programs/distrat/software/drdoclet.ps.gz
    » http://goldmark.org/jeff/programs/distrat/software/drdoclet.ps.gz
  • Gordon, I. H. (1998). Relationship marketing: new strategies, techniques and technologies to win the customer you want and feet them forever Toronto: John Wiley & Sons Canada.
  • Groesser, S. N., & Bruppacher, S. (2007, July). Decisions in the Construction Planning Process: Development of a Dynamic Model about Individual’s Energy Efficiency Intention over Time. Proceedings of the International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, USA, 25.
  • Gronroos, C. (1995). Marketing: Gerenciamento e serviços Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
  • Jacoby, B., & Chestnut, R. (1978) Brand Loyalty: Mesurement and manegement New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jain, D., & Singh, S. S. (2002). Customer lifetime value research in marketing: A review and future directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 34-46.
  • Johnson, M. S., Sivadas, E., & Garbarino, E. (2008). Customer satisfaction, perceived risk and affective commitment: An investigation of directions of influence. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(5), 353-362.
  • Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2007). The positive and negative effects of switching costs on relational outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 9(4), 335-355.
  • Kristensen, K., & Eskildsen, J. (2012). The relationship between SERVQUAL, national customer satisfaction indices, and consumer sentiment. The Quality Management Journal, 19(2), 47.
  • Lam, S. Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M. K., & Murthy, B. (2004). Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: An illustration from a business-to-business service context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 293-311.
  • Lee, J., Lee, J., & Feick, L. (2001). The impact of switching costs on the customer satisfaction-loyalty link: mobile phone service in France. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(1), 35-48.
  • Lejeune, M. A. (2001). Measuring the impact of data mining on churn management. Internet Research, 11(5), 375-387.
  • Markóczy, L. A. (1994). Barriers to shared belief: The role of strategic interest, managerial characteristics and organisational factors (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kigdom.
  • Markóczy, L. A., & Goldberg, J. (1995). A method for eliciting and comparing causal maps. Journal of management, 21(2), 305-333.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.
  • Mckenna, R. (1992) Marketing de relacionamento: Estratégias bem-sucedidas para a era do cliente Rio de Janeiro: Campus .
  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
  • Mulhern, F. J. (1999). Customer profitability analysis: Measurement, concentration, and research directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(1), 25-40.
  • Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469.
  • Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? The Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 33-44.
  • Peppers, D., & Rogers, M. (2005) Retorno sobre clientes: Um modo revolucionário de medir e fortalecer o seu negócio Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
  • Pfeifer, P. E., Haskins, M. E., & Conroy, R. M. (2005). Customer lifetime value, customer profitability, and the treatment of acquisition spending. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(1), 11-25.
  • Pidd, M. (2001). Modelagem empresarial: Ferramentas para tomada de decisão Porto Alegre: Bookman.
  • Portal Mundo do Marketing. (2013). Conheça a visão e praticas de marketing de relacionamento no Brasil Recuperado de http://www.mundodomarketing.com.br/reportagens/relacionamento/27530/conheca-a-visao-e-praticas-de-marketing-de-relacionamento-no-brasil.html
    » http://www.mundodomarketing.com.br/reportagens/relacionamento/27530/conheca-a-visao-e-praticas-de-marketing-de-relacionamento-no-brasil.html
  • Pritchard, M. P., Havitz, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1999). Analyzing the commitment-loyalty link in service contexts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 333-348.
  • Ranjbarian, B., Sanayei, A., Kaboli, M. R., & Hadadian, A. (2012). An analysis of brand image, perceived quality, customer satisfaction and re-purchase intention in Iranian department stores. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(6), 40-48.
  • Rust, R. T., Zeithaml, V. A., & Lemon, K. N. (2001). O valor do cliente Porto Alegre: Bookman.
  • Ryals, L. J., & Knox, S. (2005). Measuring risk-adjusted customer lifetime value and its impact on relationship marketing strategies and shareholder value. European Journal of Marketing, 39(5/6), 456-472.
  • Scavarda, A. J. R. R. (2004). Metodologia evocativa para mapeamento causal e sua perspectiva na gerência de operações com aplicações via internet em gestão da cadeia de suprimento e administração de serviços (Tese de doutorado). Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro-PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  • Scavarda, A., Bouzdin-Chameeva, T., Goldstein, S., Hays, J., & Hill, A. (2004, April). A review of the causal mapping practice and research literature. Proceedings of the Second World Conference on POM and 15th Annual POM Conference, Cancun, Mexico.
  • Scavarda, A. J., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., Goldstein, S. M., Hays, J. M., & Hill, A. V. (2005). A methodology for constructing collective causal maps. Decision Sciences, 37(2), 263-283.
  • Surprenant, C. F., & Solomon, M. R. (s.d.) Predictability and personalization in the service encounter. Journal Of Marketing, 51(02), 86-96.
  • Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001). Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 16-35.
  • Tong, C., Wong, S. K. S., & Lui, K. P. H. (2012). The influences of service personalization, customer satisfaction and switching costs on e-loyalty. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(3), 105-114.
  • Vavra, T. G. (1993). Marketing de relacionamento: Aftermarketing São Paulo: Atlas.
  • Vesanen, J. (2007). What is personalization? A conceptual framework. European Journal of Marketing, 41(5/6), 409-418.
  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. The Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.
  • Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2003). Marketing de serviços: A empresa com foco no cliente Porto Alegre: Bookman.
  • 2
    Processo de avaliação: Double Blind Review

Datas de Publicação

  • Publicação nesta coleção
    Oct-Dec 2015

Histórico

  • Recebido
    04 Set 2015
  • Aceito
    09 Dez 2015
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado, Av. da Liberdade, 532, 01.502-001 , São Paulo, SP, Brasil , (+55 11) 3272-2340 , (+55 11) 3272-2302, (+55 11) 3272-2302 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbgn@fecap.br