Blended learning program for the development of skills in the aspiration of artificial airways

Cordeiro, Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho; Braga, Fernanda Titareli Merizio Martins; Mata, Luciana Regina Ferreira da; Mendes, Karina Dal Sasso; Fófano, Rafael Cordeiro; Dalri, Maria Célia Barcellos

doi:10.1590/1518-8345.4539.3462

Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro

Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Hospital de Clínicas, Gerência de Ensino e Pesquisa, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-0096

Fernanda Titareli Merizio Martins Braga

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-788X

Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Enfermagem, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5080-4643

Karina Dal Sasso Mendes

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2075

Rafael Cordeiro Fófano

Polícia Militar de Minas Gerais, Corpo Aéreo, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9811-1168

Maria Célia Barcellos Dalri

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8173-8642

*
This article refers to the call “Nursing Now and Nursing in the Future”. Paper extracted from doctoral dissertation “Blended learning for the development of skills in Nursing intervention aspiration of artificial airways”, presented to Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, Brazil.

Authors’ contribution:

Study concept and design: Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro, Maria Célia Barcellos Dalri. Obtaining data: Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro, Fernanda Titareli Merizio Martins Braga, Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata, Karina Dal Sasso Mendes, Rafael Cordeiro Fófano, Maria Célia Barcellos Dalri. Data analysis and interpretation: Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro, Fernanda Titareli Merizio Martins Braga, Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata, Karina Dal Sasso Mendes, Rafael Cordeiro Fófano, Maria Célia Barcellos Dalri. Statistical analysis: Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro, Rafael Cordeiro Fófano. Drafting the manuscript: Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro, Fernanda Titareli Merizio Martins Braga, Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata, Karina Dal Sasso Mendes, Rafael Cordeiro Fófano, Maria Célia Barcellos Dalri. Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content: Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro, Fernanda Titareli Merizio Martins Braga, Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata, Karina Dal Sasso Mendes, Maria Célia Barcellos Dalri.

All authors approved the final version of the text.

Conflict of interest: the authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest.

Associate Editor: Maria Lúcia do Carmo Cruz Robazzi

Corresponding author: Aldenora Laísa Paiva de Carvalho Cordeiro E-mail: alaisapc@hotmail.com

Variable	N	%
Professional performance Teaching	14	51.9
Intensive care	4	14.8
Urgency and emergency	3	11.1
Permanent education	2	7.4
Medical clinic	2	7.4
Surgical Clinic	1	3.7
Obstetric urgencies emergencies	1	3.7
Total	27	100
Highest academic degree Master’s	10	37
PhD	17	63
Total	27	100
Variable	N	%
Area of the highest academic degree Health sciences	15	55.6
Health care	8	29.6
Nursing	3	11.1
Urgency and emergency	1	3.7
Total	27	100
Participation in a scientific event in the area of performance in the last 2 years Yes	23	85.2
No	4	14.8
Total	27	100
Publication of a scientific article in the field of performance in the last 2 years Yes	19	70.4
No	8	29.6
Total	27	100
Participation in distance or blended course Yes	26	96.3
No	1	3.7
Total	27	100
Learning Object Development Yes	14	51.9
No	13	48.1
Total	27	100

Variable	N	%
Academic training Systems Analysis and Development	4	57.1
Information Systems	2	28.6
IT	1	14.3
Total	7	100
Area of professional practice Programming	3	42.9
Technical Support	3	42.9
Network Management	1	14.3
Total	7	100
Academic degree Specialization	5	71.4
Graduation	2	28.6
Total	7	100
Area of the academic degree Systems Analysis and Development	2	28.6
Web Development	1	14.3
Development of Systems for Mobile Applications	1	14.3
Development of Business Management Systems	1	14.3
Information Systems	1	14.3
Networks	1	14.3
Total	7	100
Participation in distance or blended course Yes	6	85.7
No	1	14.3
Total	7	100
Learning Object Development Yes	1	14.3
No	6	85.7
Total	7	100

Agreement Criterion	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Agree	Strongly agree	Don't know	CVI*
Agreement Criterion	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	CVI*
General and pedagogical requirements Educational environment	-	-	7 (25.9)	20 (74.1)	-	1.00
Relevance to the teaching plan	-	-	7 (25.9)	20 (74.1)	-	1.00
Ease of use of the motivational aspects and respect for the individualities	-	-	12 (44.4)	13 (48.1)	2 (7.4)	1.00
Clarity of the contents	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
Correction of the contents	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
Vocabulary adaptation according to the target audience	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
Informational load	-	-	7 (25.9)	20 (74.1)	-	1.00
Integration of the learning objects	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
Error management	-	-	12 (44.4)	12 (44.4)	3 (11.1)	1.00
Easy to memorize	-	-	6 (22.2)	20 (74.1)	1 (3.7)	1.00
User documentation	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
Technical requirement (possibility of web display)	-	-	5 (18.6)	22 (81.5)	-	1.00
Program modality (blended)	-	-	3 (11.1)	24 (88.9)	-	1.00
Learning assessment	-	1 (3.7)	5 (18.6)	20 (74.1)	1 (3.7)	0.96
CVI^*						0.99
Specific requirements for videos There is harmony between colors, fonts, animations, vignettes and other digital resources	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
Good sound capture	-	-	1 (37.0)	17 (63.00)	9 (33.3)	1.00
Good image capture	-	-	7 (25.9)	20 (74.1)	-	1.00
Uses different formats: documentaries, animation, fiction, among others	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
The soundtrack is adequate to the theme	-	-	9 (33.3)	17 (63.0)	1 (3.7)	1.00
Approaches the contents in a logical, orderly and sequential manner	-	-	7 (25.0)	20 (74.1)	-	1.00
Presents language which is adequate to the level of the proposed education	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
Contains contextualized content consistent with the area and level of teaching proposed	-	-	6 (22.8)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
Presents originality, variety and depth of the strategies addressed	-	-	9 (33.3)	18 (66.7)	-	1.00
Shows scientific rigor of the knowledge transmitted	-	-	5 (18.5)	22 (81.5)	-	1.00
Contemplates the diversity of accents, vocabularies and regional customs	1 (3.7)	2 (7.4)	8 (29.6)	11 (40.7)	5 (18.5)	0.86
There is identification by area of knowledge and curricular component(s)	-	-	9 (33.3)	15 (55.6)	3 (11.1)	1.00
There is identification by level(s) of education	-	1 (3.7)	10 (37.0)	12 (44.4)	4 (14.8)	0.96
Favors interdisciplinarity	-	3 (11.1)	15 (55.6)	9 (33.3)	-	0.89
Refers to the students’ everyday universe, from a perspective of training and citizenship	-	-	11 (40.7)	14 (51.9)	2 (7.4)	1.00
Presented in a playful, challenging and clear manner	-	-	6 (22.2)	21 (77.8)	-	1.00
The language aspects can stimulate the interest of students and professors	-	-	5 (18.5)	21 (77.8)	1 (3.7)	1.00
There is concern with aesthetics combined with content	-	-	8 (29.6)	19 (70.4)	-	1.00
Resorts to exemplification and analogies whenever possible	-	1 (3.7)	10 (37.0)	15 (55.6)	1 (3.7)	0.96
CVI^*						0.98
Interface Free navigation	-	1 (3.7)	9 (33.3)	17 (63.0)	-	0.96
Clarity of information	-	1 (3.7)	5 (18.5)	21 (77.8)	-	0.96
Easy-to-locate information	-	-	9 (33.3)	18 (66.7)	-	1.00
Pertinence	-	-	9 (33.3)	18 (66.7)	-	1.00
Contextualization	-	-	8 (29.6)	19 (70.4)	-	1.00
Correction of the contents	-	1 (3.7)	9 (33.3)	13 (48.1)	4 (14.8)	0.96
Multiple windows	-	-	12 (44.4)	13 (48.1)	2 (7.4)	1.00
Interaction learning ease	-	-	10 (37.0)	16 (59.3)	1 (3.7)	1.00
Efficiency of use	-	-	8 (29.6)	18 (66.7)	1 (3.7)	1.00
Ease of return	-	-	10 (37.0)	17 (63.0)	-	1.00
Ergonomics	-	-	12 (44.4)	14 (51.9)	1 (3.7)	1.00
Aesthetics	-	-	8 (29.6)	19 (70.4)	-	1.00
Use of special marks	-	-	13 (48.1)	11 (40.7)	3 (11.1)	1.00
Presents audiovisual resources adequately	-	1 (3.7)	7 (25.9)	19 (70.4)	-	0.96
References	-	-	5 (18.5)	22 (81.5)	-	1.00
Interactivity	-	1 (3.7)	8 (29.6)	18 (66.7)	-	0.96
Navigation error management	-	-	12 (44.4)	6 (22.2)	9 (33.3)	1.00
Help for the users	2 (7.4)	1 (3.7)	9 (33.3)	12 (44.4)	3 (11.1)	0.87
Quality of the information	-	-	8 (29.6)	19 (70.4)	-	1.00
Robustness	-	-	10 (37.0)	16 (59.3)	1 (3.7)	1.00
Portability	-	-	11 (40.7)	10 (37.0)	6 (22.2)	1.00
Forecast updates	-	-	7 (25.9)	12 (44.4)	8 (29.6)	1.00
Reusability	-	-	9 (33.3)	18 (66.7)	-	1.00
CVI^*						0.98

Agreement Criterion	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Agree	Strongly agree	Don't know	CVI*
Agreement Criterion	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	CVI*
Interface Free navigation	-	-	5 (71.4)	2 (28.6)	-	1.00
Clarity of information	-	-	3 (42.9)	3 (42.9)	1 (14.3)	1.00
Easy-to-locate information	-	-	3 (42.9)	3 (42.9)	1 (14.3)	1.00
Pertinence	-	1 (14.3)	3 (42.9)	3 (42.9)	-	0.86
Contextualization	-	-	5 (71.4)	2 (28.6)	-	1.00
Correction of the contents	-	-	2 (28.6)	3 (42.9)	2 (28.6)	1.00
Multiple windows	-	2 (28.6)	2 (28.6)	2 (28.6)	1 (14.3)	0.67
Interaction learning ease	-	1 (14.3)	4 (57.1)	2 (28.6)	-	0.86
Efficiency of use	-	-	6 (85.7)	1 (14.3)	-	1.00
Ease of return	-	-	4 (57.1)	3 (42.9)	-	1.00
Ergonomics	-	1 (14.3)	2 (28.6)	3 (42.9)	1 (14.3)	0.83
Aesthetics	-	1 (14.3)	2 (28.6)	3 (42.9)	1 (14.3)	0.83
Use of special marks	-	-	4 (57.1)	1 (14.3)	2 (28.6)	1.00
Presents audiovisual resources adequately	-	-	5 (71.4)	2 (28.6)	-	1.00
References	-	-	4 (57.1)	3 (42.9)	-	1.00
Interactivity	-	1 (14.3)	3 (42.9)	3 (42.9)	-	0.86
Navigation error management	-	-	2 (28.6)	3 (42.9)	2 (28.6)	1.00
Help for the users	-	-	4 (57.1)	2 (28.6)	1 (14.3)	1.00
Quality of the information	-	-	3 (42.9)	3 (42.9)	1 (14.3)	1.00
Robustness	-	-	3 (42.9)	3 (42.9)	1 (14.3)	1.00
Portability	-	1 (14.3)	1 (14.3)	5 (71.4)	-	0.86
Forecast updates	-	-	3 (42.9)	3 (42.9)	1 (14.3)	1.00
Reusability	-	-	3 (42.9)	3 (42.9)	1 (14.3)	1.00
CVI^*						0.94

[1] *
This article refers to the call “Nursing Now and Nursing in the Future”. Paper extracted from doctoral dissertation “Blended learning for the development of skills in Nursing intervention aspiration of artificial airways”, presented to Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, Brazil.

Brasil

Brasil

Objective:

Method:

Results:

Conclusion: