Services on Demand
Print version ISSN 0085-5626
Rev. Bras. entomol. vol.54 no.3 São Paulo 2010
BIOLOGY, ECOLOGY AND DIVERSITY
Synanthropy and ecological aspects of Muscidae (Diptera) in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in Colombia
Sinantropía y algunos aspectos de la ecología de Muscidae (Diptera) en un ecosistema de bosque seco tropical en Colombia
Natalia Uribe-M.I; Marta WolffI; Claudio J. B. de CarvalhoII
IGrupo de Entomología, Universidad de Antioquia, Apartado aereo 1226, Medellín, Colombia. firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
IIDepartamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba-PR, Brazil. firstname.lastname@example.org
The synanthropic index and other ecological aspects of the Muscidae family were evaluated through simultaneous monthly sampling in three different environments (urban, rural and forest) using van Someren-Rydon traps baited with human faeces, chicken viscera and decomposing fish and onion. Four traps were set up in each environment (one per bait item) for 48 hours per month, with samples taken every 12 hours. A total of 5726 specimens were collected, belonging to 19 species and 13 genera. Brontaea normata (+99,9), Brontaea quadristigma (+96,9), Synthesiomyia nudiseta (+96,5), Ophyra aenescens (+96,2), Musca domestica (+95,7) and Atherigona orientalis (+93,8) had the highest synanthropic indices, showing a marked preference for human environments. The most abundant species were B. normata (24,31%), Biopyrellia bipuncta (20,60%) and Pseudoptilolepis nigripoda (15,82%), the latter two showed a preference for uninhabited areas. A total of 11 new records for Colombia were found: Ophyra aenescens, Cyrtoneuropsis pararescita, Morellia basalis, Neomuscina dorsipuncta, Biopyrellia bipuncta, Pseudoptilolepis nigripoda, Neomuscina instabilis, Neomuscina currani, Polietina orbitalis, Neomuscina pictipennis and Cyrtoneuropsis maculipennis. Except for the first four species, the remainder presented negative synantrophy indexes (from minor to major), which would allow to use them as ecological indicators of the disturbance degree of dry forests in Colombia.
Keywords: Ecology; flies; human environments; La Pintada.
Se evaluó el índice de sinantropía al igual que otros aspectos ecológicos de la familia Muscidae, mediante muestreos mensuales simultáneos en tres ambientes (urbano, rural y bosque), para lo cual se utilizaron trampas van Someren Rydon cebadas con excremento humano, vísceras de pollo, pescado y cebolla en descomposición. En cada zona se instalaron cuatro trampas (una por atrayente), durante 48 horas cada mes, realizando colectas cada 12 horas. Se colectaron 5726 ejemplares pertenecientes a 19 especies y 13 géneros. Brontaea normata (+99,9), Brontaea quadristigma (+96,9), Synthesiomyia nudiseta (+96,5), Ophyra aenescens (+96,2), Musca domestica (+95,7) y Atherigona orientalis (+93,8), presentaron los índices de sinantropía mas altos, mostrando una marcada preferencia por los ambientes humanos. Las especies más abundante fueron B. normata (24,31%), Biopyrellia bipuncta (20,60%) y Pseudoptilolepis nigripoda (15,82%), las dos últimas con preferencia por áreas deshabitadas. Se encontraron un total de 11 reportes nuevos para Colombia: Ophyra aenescens, Cyrtoneuropsis pararescita, Morellia basalis, Neomuscina dorsipuncta, Biopyrellia bipuncta, Pseudoptilolepis nigripoda, Neomuscina instabilis, Neomuscina currani, Polietina orbitalis, Neomuscina pictipennis y Cyrtoneuropsis maculipennis. Exceptuando las primeras cuatro especies, las restantes presentaron índices de sinantropía bajos (de menor a mayor), lo que permitiría usarlas como indicadores ecológicos del grado de perturbación de los bosques secos en Colombia.
Palabras-clave: Ambiente humano; ecología; La Pintada; moscas.
Muscidae are a large family belonging to the order Diptera. Almost 4500 species have been described, covering all biogeographic regions, 846 of which are present in the Neotropics (de Carvalho et al. 2005). Adults can be predatory, hematophagous, saprophagous or necrophagous, living in varied habitats, such as dung, decomposing organic vegetable or animal matter, wood, fungi, nests and dens, among others (Couri & de Carvalho 2005; Espindola 2006). Some species are considered to be of medical and veterinary importance, given that they act as mechanical vectors for a large variety of pathogens (Greenberg & Klowden 1972; Manrique-Saide & Delfín-González 1997; Thyssen et al. 2004; Graczyk et al. 2005; Sukontason et al. 2006; Reilly et al. 2007), others cause obligate or facultative myiasis (Greenberg 1971; Guimarães & Papavero 1999).
Some species have developed a close relationship with human settlements given the available resources at these dwellings (Linhares 1981a). The degree and nature of this relationship depends on the species, geographic and climatic variation, as well as the characteristics of each human group who modify their surroundings according to their way of life. This type of behaviour is known as synanthropy (Nuorteva 1963). Gregor and Povolny (1958) classified this behaviour in three categories according to the abundance of each species in a determined ecological area: eusynanthropic (endophilic and exophilic; communicative and non communicative), hemisynanthropic and asynanthropic. Eusynanthropic species are typically urban and can be found within housing; hemisynanthropic species inhabit semi-rural areas; and asynanthropic species are mainly found in well-conserved environments. The former two categories are of the highest medical and sanitary importance.
Tropical dry forest is considered one of the most threatened ecosystems in the Neotropics given the intense changes in land use due to human activities (Janzen 1983). In Colombia, this ecosystem is placed among the three most degraded and fragmented ecosystems, as well as being one of the least well known (Álvarez et al. 1997). Only about 1.5% of the original ecosystem coverage of 80,000 km2 is estimated to remain (Etter 1993). Dry forest was originally located on the Caribbean plains and inter-Andean valleys of the rivers Magdalena and Cauca between an altitude of 0 and 1000 m, in the provinces of Valle del Cauca, Tolima, Huila, Cundinamarca, Antioquia, Sucre, Bolívar, Cesar, Magdalena, Atlántico and south Guajira (Álvarez et al. 1997). Knowledge of this habitat type in Colombia is poor (Álvarez et al. 1997) and represents a serious obstacle to its conservation and sustainable management. Entomological knowledge of this ecosystem is even more deficient, estimates of insect diversity are lacking and their roles in ecosystem functioning are largely unknown (Escobar 1997). Monitoring of insects in natural areas is one of the simplest ways to observe and provide early warning of changes to biodiversity and habitat structure. This is possible for insects' utility as biological and ecological indicators of local, regional and national diversity as well as degree of disturbance.
Muscidae is an important component of South America's synanthropic fauna, however the species of the family had only been studied from this perspective in Cuba (Gregor 1975); Campinas (Linhares 1981b), Curitiba (de Carvalho et al. 1984), Rio de Janeiro (d'Almeida 1992), Pelotas (Costa et al. 2000) and Paracambi (Espindola 2006) in Brazil; and Valdívia (Figueroa & Linhares 2004) in Chile. In Colombia, studies on Muscidae are scarce. The present study aims to evaluate ecological and synanthropic aspects of the species of Muscidae in three areas differing in their degree of human intervention, thus contributing to knowledge of this group within a tropical dry forest ecosystem.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The municipality of La Pintada is located in the southeast of the province of Antioquia at a latitude of 5º 44' north, a longitude of 75º 36' west and an altitude of 600 m. The area is of great regional importance given that it is located at a strategic intersection of interprovincial highways within the province. The municipality has an area of 55 km2 with a population of 10,450 inhabitants and an urban area of 6.5 km2. Average annual temperature is 27ºC and relative humidity is 76%. Average annual rainfall is 1000 mm, with a bimodal pattern consisting of two wet seasons (April-May and September-November) and two drier periods (December-March and June-August) (Velásquez et al. 2006).
Sampling was carried out simultaneously in three areas with different ecological characteristics. 1) Urban Zone: located in the municipal capital (5º44'48"N; 75º36'34"W) at an altitude of 610 m. This area has piped drinking water, sewers and periodic rubbish collection. 2) Rural Zone: sampling was carried out in fields (5º43'25"N; 75º37'26"W) at 5 km from the urban zone and at an altitude of 770 m. Drinking water in this area is collected from a spring, there is also a sceptic tank, and rubbish is buried. The site provides ecotourism services with approximately 150 visitors per month, there are four permanent inhabitants as well as cattle and horses. 3) Forest Zone: this area is characterised by low human disturbance and is located at the base of a rocky outcrop, known as the Farallón de la Paz, at 5.5 km from the Urban Zone and at an altitude of 850 m (5º43'24"N; 75º37'15"W).
Flies were captured with Van Someren-Rydon traps, placed 1 m above the ground and separated by 50 m between each trap. Four types of bait were used: chicken viscera, decomposing fish, human faeces (Nourteva 1963) and decomposing onion (Allium cepa L.) (de Carvalho et al. 1984). Care was taken to place approximately the same quantity of bait (100g) per trap. Four traps (one per type of bait) were placed in each of the three zones of the study area for a period of 48 hours each month for six months. Samples were taken every 12 hours, wetting the bait if necessary. Samples were separated by trap and by time of collection (day 6:00-18:00 and night 18:00-6:00).
The study was carried out from February to July 2007: 15-16 February, 15-16 March, 19-20 April, 24-25 May, 21-22 June and 25-26 July. Weather data during the sampling period were provided by the Colombian Meteorological Institute (Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales de Colombia -IDEAM).
Specimens were separated, quantified, mounted and identified using taxonomic keys the de Carvalho (2002), Marques and Couri (2007) and Nihei and de Carvalho (2007). A reference collection was deposited at the Entomological Collection of the Universidad de Antioquia (CEUA - National Collection No. 036).
The synanthropic index (SI) was calculated according to Nuorteva (1963) using the formula:
IS = (2a+b-2c)/2
a = percentage of individuals of each species collected in the urban zone
b= percentage of the same species collected in the rural zone
c = percentage of the same species collected in the forest zone
The index ranges from +100 to -100, where a value of +100 indicates a strong preference of the species for densely populated urban areas and -100 indicates a complete avoidance of human settlements. Intermediate values indicate differential degrees of synanthropy. This analysis was carried out for those species with more than 10 individuals collected.
A total of 5726 specimens of Muscidae were collected, belonging to 13 genera and 19 species, 11 of which are new reports for Colombia (Table I). Brontaea normata (Bigot, 1885), Biopyrellia bipuncta (Wiedemann, 1830) and Pseudoptilolepis nigripoda (Snyder, 1949) were the most abundant species, representing 61.16% of the total number of individuals. Monthly abundance of Muscidae species is shown in Table III. In general terms, abundance increased in months with most rainfall (Fig. 1). With regard to nycthemeral (daily) behaviour, 68.39% of individuals showed diurnal activity between 6:00 and 18:00 (Table II). A greater number of females was collected, representing 67.05% of the total (Table II).
Brontaea normata has a Neotropical distribution, present in Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil and Paraguay (de Carvalho & Pont 1997). This species showed the highest number of captures (Table I), corresponding to 24.31% of the Muscidae studied. The majority of individuals were collected in May in the urban study area (97.43%), showing a notable increase in abundance during this month (Table III). This species also showed a strong attraction for faeces, with a preference of 99.29%. Its synanthropic index was +99.89, showing a strong preference for human settlements. It was not recorded in the forest zone (Table V). In total, 62.86% of specimens were collected at night.
Biopyrellia bipuncta was the second highest in abundance (Table I). The species is found in Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela, Trinidad and Tobago, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina (de Carvalho et al. 2005). This study represents the first record of the species for Colombia. The species showed an increase in abundance in months with less rainfall, with a peak in June, when 59.13% of the total number of individuals were collected. The species showed a strong preference for human faeces (Table IV) and its synanthropic index was -20.86, implying a strong avoidance of human settlements.
Pseudoptilolepis nigripoda has been recorded from Nicaragua, Panama, Brazil (Schuehli & de Carvalho 2005), Costa Rica, Venezuela (de Carvalho et al. 2005), USA (Lopes & de Carvalho 1985). This study represents the first record from Colombia. It showed greatest abundance in the wettest months, especially April (Table III). It was strongly attracted to decomposing animal bait (Table IV), especially chicken viscera, representing 57.94% of captures. Its synanthropic index was -35.43, showing a strong avoidance of human settlements.
Morellia basalis (Walker, 1853) has been reported in Mexico, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Cuba, Haiti, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Venezuela and the Neartic region (de Carvalho et al. 2005), with this study representing the first record for Colombia. The greatest number of captures was made in the months of May and June (Table III). The greatest number of individuals was collected on human faeces (Table IV). Its synanthropic index was +74.53, showing a strong preference for human settlements, with 57.7% collected in the urban area.
Cyrtoneuropsis gemina (Wiedemann, 1830) is found in Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, Brazil and Paraguay (de Carvalho et al. 2005). Capture of this species was directly related to rainfall, increasing in those months with greatest rainfall (Table III). A total of 92.19% of individuals were collected on human faeces, showing a strong preference for this type of bait. The synanthropic index of this species was +69.53, showing a preference for human environments (Table V).
Musca domestica (Linnaeus, 1758) is a cosmopolitan species (de Carvalho et al. 2005). Slightly less than half the specimens (47.49%) were collected in April (Table III). The species showed a strong preference for animal bait (fish and chicken viscera) on which 98.32% of individuals were collected. Its synanthropic index was +95.65, showing eusynanthropic behaviour (Table V).
Atherigona orientalis (Schiner, 1868) is distributed throughout the tropics (de Carvalho et al. 2005). Its abundance was related to relative humidity, with captures increasing as humidity increased. It showed a strong preference for decaying bait on which 94.78% of individuals were collected (Table IV). The synanthropic index was +93.78, showing a strong preference for densely populated human settlements (Table V).
Brontaea quadristigma (Thomson, 1869) is found in Mexico, Honduras, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guadalupe Is., Grenada, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, St. Martin, Trinidad & Tobago, Peru, Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Brazil, Argentina, Chile; Nearctic Region (de Carvalho et al. 2005). It was collected mainly in May (88.28%), exclusively on human faeces (Table IV). Its synanthropic index was +96.90, indicating a strong preference for human settlements, with 93.8% of individuals collected in the urban area. It was not recorded in forest.
Synthesiomyia nudiseta (Wulp, 1883) is found in the Neotropics (de Carvalho et al. 2005). It was collected throughout the study period, but with greater incidence in wetter months (Table III). It showed a greater attraction to decomposing animal bait (fish and chicken, without preference) on which 86.73% of individuals were collected (Table IV). Its synanthropic index was +96.46, showing a strong preference for urban areas, without records in the forest (Table I). Of all specimens collected, 92.92% were females (Table II).
Neomuscina pictipennis (Bigot, 1878) is found in Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela, Guyana, Peru, Brazil and Paraguay (de Carvalho et al. 2005). This is the first record in Colombia. It was only collected between April and July (Table III), with an increase in abundance during wetter months. Most individuals were collected on fish bait (68.09%). Its synanthropic index was -98.40, indicating a complete avoidance of human settlements. It was not collected in the urban area and 98.93% of individuals were captured in the forest area.
Neomuscina dorsipuncta (Stein, 1918) is found in Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela and Brazil (de Carvalho et al. 2005), with this study representing the first record for Colombia. It showed a preference for the wetter months, being absent in February when the least rainfall and the highest temperature were recorded (Fig. 1). A preference was shown for chicken viscera, with 96.97% of individuals collected on animal remains (Table IV). No specimens were taken on human faeces. Its synanthropic index was +11.36, with captures being more frequent in the rural zone (68.18%).
Less than 50 individuals of the following species were collected, therefore the index only provides an approximate indication of synanthropic trends (Nuorteva 1963).
Polietina orbitalis (Couri & Lopes, 1987) has only been recorded from Brazil (de Carvalho et al. 2005), with this study representing the first record for Colombia. It was present throughout the whole of the study period without abundance being linked to any environmental factor in particular. Although it was collected on all bait types, it showed the greatest attraction for human faeces (Table IV). Its synanthropic index was -72.73, showing an avoidance of human environments. No captures of this species were made in the urban area.
Cyrtoneurina geminata (Stein, 1904) is found in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, Brazil and Paraguay (de Carvalho et al. 2005). The species was collected from May through July, with greatest abundance in June. This species was only collected on human faeces and its synanthropic index was -27.63, with only 2.6% collected in urban areas, showing an avoidance of human settlements (Table V).
Neomuscina currani (Snyder, 1949) has been recorded in Panama and Brazil (de Carvalho et al. 2005). This study represents a new species record for Colombia. Specimens were collected from April through June, with greatest abundance in April (Table III), the species showed a preference for animal bait (fish and chicken) without a preference for either type. The synanthropic index for this species was -51.61, not being collected in urban areas, and therefore showing an avoidance of these environments.
Neomuscina instabilis (Snyder, 1949) has been recorded in Trinidad and Tobago, Panama and Brazil (de Carvalho et al. 2005), with this study representing a new record for Colombia. The species was present throughout the study period with the exception of February, with greatest abundance in April. It was only captured with decomposing animal bait, without preference for any type (Table IV). The synanthropic index for this species was -41.67. It was captured in all three study areas, showing a preference for forested zones (Table I).
Graphomya sp. was only collected in relatively wetter months (April - June), showing a greater attraction for fish bait (Table IV). Its synanthropic index was +50.00, with 84.00% of individuals collected in rural areas, showing a preference for human environments.
Cyrtoneuropsis maculipennis (Macquart, 1843) is found in Costa Rica, Panama, French Guiana, Brazil and Bolivia (de Carvalho et al. 2005), with this study representing the first record for Colombia. It was collected from April through June, with just one individual captured in February. The species was captured in all types of bait, especially fish and human faeces. The synanthropic index for this species was -100, showing a total avoidance of human settlements (Table V).
Cyrtoneuropsis pararescita (Couri, 1995) had only been reported for Brazil (de Carvalho et al. 2005) prior to this study, representing the first record for Colombia. It was only collected from May through June, showing a preference for human faeces (87.50%). Its synanthropic index was +78.13, without captures being recorded in forest areas, showing a preference for inhabited environments.
Ophyra aenescens (Wiedmann, 1830) is found throughout the Neotropical, Neartic and western Paleartic region, as well as the eastern Pacific (de Carvalho et al. 2005). It was collected from April through July, with an increase in May. It was only attracted by decomposing animal matter, with a preference for fish. The synanthropic index for this species was +96.15, being captured with greater frequency in urban zones (92.30%), showing a preference for human environments (Table V).
The most abundant species was B. normata, with increased abundance shown in months with greatest rainfall. This species was collected with greatest frequency in urban zones, obtaining the highest synanthropic index (+99.89). This trait, as well as its strong attraction to human faeces could make it a potential vector for the transport of pathogens to humans. This species is associated with human environments in Brazil (de Carvalho et al. 2002). B. normata and B. quadristigma have been reported to visit bovine faeces, suggesting the use of this substrate by its larvae (de Carvalho & Pont 1997; Marchiori & Linhares 1999; Marchiori et al. 2001).
Another species showing a strong attraction to faeces was B. bipuncta, although contrary to B. normata, it showed a weak relationship with human environments. In the municipality of La Pintada it was the second most important species in terms of abundance. These characteristics coincide with those observed in Paracambi (Brazil) where it showed a strong preference for human faeces, an avoidance of human environments (SI = -87.01), as well as being the most abundant species (Espindola 2006). de Carvalho & Couri (1991) and Koller et al. (2004) reported this species in areas of low human intervention, although de Carvalho et al. (2002) indicated the species as associated with human environments. Mendes & Linhares (2002) collected it in bovine faeces, showing that this substrate was used for larval development. Therefore the species is most frequently found in rural and forest areas.
Pseudoptilolepis nigripoda was the third most abundant species in this study, showing strong necrophagous behaviour, mainly in areas of forest, thus this species could be employed as a forensic entomological indicator in tropical dry forest. It showed a negative synanthropic index, coinciding with that found in Campinas (Brazil), where it was shown to be highly asynanthropic (Table VI). Pombal & Morellato (2002) reported P. nigripoda for semi-deciduous forest in Brazil, as the principal pollinator of Metrodorea nigra (Rutaceae).
The next most abundant species were M. basalis, C. gemina, M. domestica, A. orientalis, B. quadristigma and S. nudiseta, all of which showed a strong preference for human environments, especially the latter four, similar to that reported in de Carvalho et al. (2002) for Brazil. Musca domestica was the only common species in all studies, providing evidence for its previously known eusynanthropic behaviour (Ferrar et al. 1975; Linhares 1981b; de Carvalho et al. 1984; d'Almeida 1992; Figueroa-Roa & Linhares 2004; Espindola 2006; Costamagna et al. 2007). Morellia basalis was reported for the first time as a synanthropic species, and given its preference for faeces could be considered important in the transmission of pathogens to humans. Cyrtoneuropsis gemina also showed a strong preference for this substrate, a behaviour which was previously reported in Paracambi (Espindola 2006) and on Isla del Governador, Rio de Janeiro (Leandro & d'Almeida 2005). However, in these studies, it was shown to have a low preference for human environments and a low number of individuals, contrary to that found in La Pintada.
Despite A. orientalis, S. nudiseta and M. domestica being collected on all types of bait, they showed a marked necrophagous behaviour, confirming their importance in forensic entomology (Salazar 2006; Calderón- Arguedas et al. 2005; Horenstein et al. 2005; Krüger et al. 2002; d'Almeida et al. 1997). d'Almeida & Almeida (1998) and Oliveira et al. (2002a) reported the above species for Rio de Janeiro, with the latter being the most abundant at the zoo operated by Fundación Rio Zoo as well as having the second highest number of helminths eggs on its body surface and intestinal contents (Oliveira et al. 2002b; Oliveira et al. 2006).
Atherigona orientalis was the most abundant species found at Campinas (Linhares 1981b) and Rio de Janeiro (d'Almeida 1992) and the second most abundant at Paracambi (Espindola 2006), always exhibiting eusynanthropic behaviour (Table VI).
d'Almeida & Almeida (1998) reported a larger trophic niche for this species in the urban area of Rio de Janeiro, with a preference for vegetable substrate for reproduction, coinciding with Ogbalu et al. (2005). A. orientalis differs to behaviour shown in La Pintada in this study, where it was found with most frequency on decomposing animal bait. Given that all specimens collected were female, it is feasible that they were looking for substrate to lay their eggs in (Couri & Araújo 1992).
The genus with the greatest number of species collected was Neomuscina (11 spp.), showing a strong preference for rural and forest areas. Neomuscina pictipennis was the most abundant as well as showing the highest avoidance of human environments, coinciding with that observed by d'Almeida (1992) in Rio de Janeiro. All species showed strong necrophagous behaviour, differing from that reported by Snyder (1949), who suggested that these species were of minor economic and sanitary importance.
Cyrtoneuropsis maculipennis was collected exclusively in forest areas, contrary to that found by de Carvalho et al. (2002) and Moura et al. (1997) who found an association between these species and inhabited areas. P. orbitalis and C. geminata also showed a strong preference for uninhabited areas, with the latter being exclusively collected on faeces, coinciding with that observed by Snyder (1954) and Mendes & Linhares (2002).
The species with the highest proportion of individuals collected in the rural study area was Graphomya sp., whereas C. pararescita and O. aenescens showed a greater preference for inhabited areas, and absent from forest areas. C. pararescita showed a stronger attraction for faeces, in agreement with that shown by Snyder (1954), Couri (1995) and Marchiori et al. (2001). Despite the low number of individuals collected of O. aenescens, a strong preference was observed for inhabited areas, coinciding with that observed in Campinas (Linhares 1981b) where was found to have the highest synanthropic index. The same was found in Paracambi (Espindola 2006), differing from a study in Pelotas (Costa et al. 2000) where it was shown to have no preference for inhabited areas (SI = +18.65). In Rio de Janeiro (d'Almeida, 1992), the species showed a preference for uninhabited areas as well as strong necrophagous behaviour, similar to that shown in studies by Linhares (1981b) and Espindola (2006). Given its synanthropic trait and the facultative capacity of its larvae to predate the species of sanitary importance, the species has been employed in the biological control of M. domestica (Turner et al. 1992; Axtell 1999; Ribeiro et al. 2000a; Ribeiro et at. 2000b).
The increasing knowledge of biological and meteorological factors that affect synanthropic arthropods in dry ecosystems in the Neotropical region, would allow to predict the species dynamics and their effects on these ecosystems. In fact the occurrence of forest species in those anthropic habitats, suggests the high vulnerability of them to changes caused by forest transformations.
Acknowledgements. We offer our most sincere thanks to Sandra Pérez for her help with taxonomy, to the Entomological Group at the Universidad de Antioquia, and to Comfenalco-Antioquia and CODI for funding this project . Also, many thanks to Eliana Flores, M. Astrid Botero, Carolina Vélez, Luis A. Vergara, Juan David Sánchez, Augusto L. Montoya, Cornelio A. Bota, Carolina Rivera, Ana Zambrano, Laura V. Londoño and Luis F. Ortiz for their invaluable help with fieldwork. CNPq provided grant to CJBC (Brazil) (process number 300873/2008-5)
d'Almeida, J. M. 1992. Calyptrate Diptera (Muscidae and Anthomyidae) of the state of Rio de Janeiro - I. Synanthropy. Memórias Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 87: 381-386. [ Links ]
d'Almeida, J. M. & J. R. de Almeida. 1998. Nichos tróficos em dípteros caliptrados, no Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 58: 563-570. [ Links ]
d'Almeida, J. M.; M. L. G. Piana & C. T. Selem. 1997. Comportamento reprodutivo de Synthesiomyia nudiseta van der Wulp (Diptera: Muscidae) sob condições de laboratório. Memórias Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 92: 563-564. [ Links ]
Álvarez, M.; F. Escobar; F. Gast; H. Mendoza; A. Repizzo & H. Villareal. 1997. Bosque Seco Tropical, p. 56-71. In: M. E.Chaves & N. Arango (eds.). Informe Nacional sobre el Estado de la Biodiversidad Tomo I. Colombia, Bogotá Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 535 p. [ Links ]
Axtell, R. C. 1999. Poultry integrated pest management: Status and future. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 4: 53-73. [ Links ]
Calderón-Arguedas, O.; A. Troyo & M. E. Solano. 2005. Cuantificación de formas larvales de Synthesiomyia nudiseta (Diptera: Muscidae) como un criterio en el análisis del intervalo Post mortem. Parasitología Latinoamericana 60: 138-143. [ Links ]
de Carvalho, C. J. B. (ed.) 2002. Muscidae (Diptera) of the Neotropical Region: taxonomy. Curitiba, Editora Universidade Federal do Paraná, 287 p. [ Links ]
de Carvalho, C. J. B.; J. R. Almeida & C. B. Jesus. 1984. Dípteros sinantrópicos de Curitiba e arrededores (Paraná, Brasil). I. Muscidae. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 28: 551-560. [ Links ]
de Carvalho, C. J. B. & M. S. Couri. 1991. Muscidae, Fanniidae e Calliphoridae (Diptera) do Projeto Maracá, Roraima, Brasil. Acta Amazonica 21: 35-43. [ Links ]
de Carvalho, C. J. B.; M. S. Couri; A. C. Pont; D. Pamplona & S. M. Lopes. 2005. A Catalogue of the Muscidae (Diptera) of the Neotropical Region. Zootaxa 860: 1-282. [ Links ]
de Carvalho, C. J. B. ; M. O. Moura & P. B. Ribeiro. 2002. Chave para adultos de dípteros (Muscidae, Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae) asociados ao ambiente humano no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 46: 107-114. [ Links ]
de Carvalho, C. J. B. & A. C. Pont. 1997. A revision of new world Brontaea Kowarz (Diptera, Muscidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14: 723-749. [ Links ]
Costa, P. R. P.; R. L. Franz; E. E. S. Vianna & P. B. Ribeiro. 2000. Synanthropy of Ophyra spp. (Diptera, Muscidae) in Pelotas, RS, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 9: 165-168. [ Links ]
Costamagna, S. R.; E. C. Visciarelli; L. D. Lucchi; N. E. Basabe, M. P. Esteban & A. Oliva. 2007. Aportes al conocimiento de los dípteros ciclorrafos en el área urbana de Bahía Blanca (provincia de Buenos Aires), Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 9: 1-4. [ Links ]
Couri, M. S. 1995. Uma nova espécie de Cyrtoneurina Giglio-Tos do Brasil (Diptera, Muscidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 12: 229-232. [ Links ]
Couri, M. S. & P. F. de Araújo. 1992. The immature stages of Atherigona orientalis Schiner (Diptera: Muscidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 105: 490-493. [ Links ]
Couri, M. S. & C. J. B. de Carvalho. 2005. Diptera Muscidae do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Brasil). Biota Neotropica 5: 1-18. [ Links ]
Escobar, F. 1997. Estudio de la comunidad de coleópteros coprófagos (Scarabaeidae) en un remanente de Bosque seco al Norte del Tolima, colombia. Caldasia 19: 419-430. [ Links ]
Espindola, C. B. 2006. Composição e estrutura de comunidades de muscóides (Diptera) em Paracambi, RJ. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 124 p. [ Links ]
Etter, A. 1993. Diversidad Ecosistémica en Colombia hoy, p. 43-61. In: S. Cárdenas & H. D. Correa (eds.). Nuestra Diversidad Biológica. Bogotá, Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar - CEREC, 296 p. [ Links ]
Ferrar, P.; H. A. Standfast & A. L. Dyce. 1975. A survey of blood-sucking and synanthropic diptera and dung insects on Norfolk Island, South Pacific. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 14: 7-13. [ Links ]
Figueroa-Roa, L. & A. X. Linhares. 2004. Synanthropy of Muscidae (Diptera) in the City of Valdivia, Chile. Neotropical Entomology 33: 647-651. [ Links ]
Graczyk, T. K.; R. Knight & L. Tamang. 2005. Mechanical transmission of human protozoan parasites by insects. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 18: 128-132. [ Links ]
Greenberg, B. 1971. Flies and Disease. Volume 1. Ecology, Classification and Biotic Associations. Princeton, University Press, ix + 856 p. [ Links ]
Greenberg, B. & M. Klowden. 1972. Enteric bacterial interactions in insects. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 25: 1459-1466. [ Links ]
Gregor, F. 1975. Synanthropy of Muscidae and Calliphoridae (Diptera) in Cuba. Folia Parasitologica 22: 57-61. [ Links ]
Gregor, F. & D. Povolny. 1958. Versuch einer Klassifikation der Synanthropen Fliegen. Journal of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Microbiology and Immunology 2: 205-216. [ Links ]
Guimarães, J. H. & N. Papavero. 1999. Myiasis in man and animals in the Neotropical Region: bibliographic database. São Paulo, Plêiade/FAPESP, 308 p. [ Links ]
Horenstein, M. B.; M. I. Arnaldos; B. Rosso & M. D. García. 2005. Estudio preliminar de la comunidad sarcosaprófaga en Córdoba (Argentina): aplicación a la entomología forense. Anales de Biología 27: 191-201. [ Links ]
Janzen, D. H. 1983. Seasonal change in abundance of large nocturnal dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) in Costa Rica deciduos forest and adjacent horse pastures. Oikos 33: 274-283. [ Links ]
Koller, W. W.; P. R. Gomes; A. Gomes; S. T. P. dos Santos & A. C. de S. Umaki. 2004. Dinâmica populacional de Muscidae (Diptera) em mata ciliar remanescente, em Campo Grande, MS, Brasil. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 71: 636-639. [ Links ]
Krüger, R. F.; P. B. Ribeiro; C. J. B. de Carvalho & P. R. P. Costa. 2002. Desenvolvimento de Synthesiomyia nudiseta (Diptera, Muscidae) em laboratório. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 92: 25-30. [ Links ]
Leandro, M. J. F. & J. M. d'Almeida. 2005. Levantamento de Calliphoridae, Fanniidae, Muscidae e Sarcophagidae em um fragmento de mata na Ilha do Governador, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 95: 377-381. [ Links ]
Linhares, A. X. 1981a. Synanthropy of Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae (Diptera) in the city of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 25: 189-215. [ Links ]
Linhares, A. X. 1981b. Synanthropy of Muscidae, Fanniidae and Anthomyiidae (Diptera) in the city of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 25: 231-243. [ Links ]
Lopes, S. M. & C. J. B. de Carvalho. 1985. Considerações sobre Pseudoptiloleps Snyder, 1949 com descrição do macho de P. nudapleura Snyder, 1949 (Diptera, Muscidae, Cyrtoneurininae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 45: 56-62. [ Links ]
Manrique-Saide, P. C. & H. Delfín-González. 1997. Importancia de las moscas como vectores potenciales de enfermedades diarreicas en humanos. Revista Biomédica 8: 163-170. [ Links ]
Marchiori, C. H. & A. X. Linhares. 1999. Constância, dominância e freqüência mensal de dípteros muscóides e seus parasitóides (Hymenoptera e Coleoptera), Associados a Fezes Frescas de Bovinos, em Uberlândia, MG. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 28: 375-387. [ Links ]
Marchiori, C. H.; A. T. de Oliveira & A. X. Linhares. 2001. Artrópodes Associados a Massas Fecais Bovinas no Sul do Estado de Goiás. Neotropical Entomology 30: 19-24. [ Links ]
Marques, B. & M. Couri. 2007. Taxonomia e morfologia de espécies neotropicais de Graphomya Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera, Muscidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 51: 436-444. [ Links ]
Mendes, J. & A. X. Linhares. 2002. Cattle Dung Breeding Diptera in Pastures in Southeastern Brazil: Diversity, Abundance and Seasonallity. Memórias Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 97: 1-5. [ Links ]
Moura, M. O.; C. J. B. de Carvalho & E. L. A. Monteiro-Filho. 1997. A preliminary analysis of insects of medico-legal importance in Curitiba, State of Paraná. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 92: 269-274. [ Links ]
Nihei, S. S. & C. J. B. de Carvalho. 2007. Systematics and biogeography of Polietina Schnabl & Dziedzicki (Diptera, Muscidae): Neotropical area relationships and Amazonia as a composite area. Systematic Entomology 32: 493-532. [ Links ]
Nuorteva, P. 1963. Synanthropy of Blowflies (Dipt., Calliphoridae) in Finlandia. Annales Entomologicae Fennicae 29: 1-49. [ Links ]
Ogbalu, O. K.; J. J. Emelike & C. C. Obunwo. 2005. Studies on effects of artificial diets on pre-ovoposition, ovoposition period, fecundity and longevity of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner) (Diptera, Muscidae). Journal of Applied Sciences 5: 1735-1738. [ Links ]
Oliveira, V. C. de; J. M. d'Almeida; M. J. Paes & A. Sanavria. 2002a. Population dynamics of calyptrate Diptera (Muscidae and Sarcophagidae) at the Rio-Zoo Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 62: 191-196. [ Links ]
Oliveira, V. C. de; R. P. de Mello & J. M. d'Almeida. 2002b. Dípteros muscóides como vetores mecânicos de ovos de helmintos em jardim zoológico, Brasil. Revista de Saúde Pública 36: 614-620. [ Links ]
Oliveira, V. C.; J. M. d'Almeida; I. V. Abalem de Sá; J. R. Mandarino & C. A. Solari. 2006. Enterobactérias associadas a adultos de Musca domestica (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Muscidae) e Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1754) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) no Jardim Zoológico, Rio de Janeiro. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 58: 556-561. [ Links ]
Pombal, E. C. P. & L. P. C. Morellato. 2002. Differentiation of floral color and odor in two fly pollinated species of Metrodorea (Rutaceae) from Brazil. Plant Systematics and Evolution 221: 141-156. [ Links ]
Reilly, L. A.; J. Favacho; L. M. Garcez & O. Courtenay. 2007. Preliminary evidence that synanthropic flies contribute to the transmission of trachomacausing Chlamydia trachomatis in Latin America. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 23: 1682-1688. [ Links ]
Ribeiro, P. B.; C. J. B. de Carvalho; A. M. Chernaki & P. R. P. Costa. 2000a. Longevidade, ovoposição e viabilidade pupal de Ophyra aenescens Wiedemann, 1830 (Diptera, Muscidae, Azeliinae), em condições de laboratório. Revista brasileira de Agrociência 6: 264-268. [ Links ]
Ribeiro, P. B.; C. J. B. de Carvalho & P. Silveira Jr. 2000b. Flutuação populacional das espécies de Ophyra Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera, Muscidae, Azeliinae), em Pelotas, RS. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 67: 205-214. [ Links ]
Salazar, J. L. 2006. Insectos de importancia forense en cadáveres de ratas, Carabobo - Vene zuela. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica 23: 33-38. [ Links ]
Schuehli, G. S. e & C. J. B. de Carvalho. 2005. Revision and cladistics of the Neotropical genus Pseudoptilolepis Snyder (Diptera, Muscidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22: 23-34. [ Links ]
Snyder, F. M. 1949. Revision of Neomuscina Townsend. American Museum Novitates 1404: 1-39. [ Links ]
Snyder, F. M. 1954. A Revision of Cyrtoneurina Giglio-Tos, with notes on related genera (Diptera, Muscidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 103: 417-464. [ Links ]
Sukontason, K. L.; N. Bunchu; R. Methanitikorn; T. Chaiwong; B. Kuntalue & K. Sukontason. 2006. Ultrastructure of adhesive device in fly in families calliphoridae, muscidae and sarcophagidae, and their implication as mechanical carriers of pathogens. Parasitol Res 98: 477-481. [ Links ]
Thyssen, P. J.; T. de C. Moretti; M. T. Ueta & O. B. Ribeiro. 2004. O papel de insetos (Blattodea, Diptera e Hymenoptera) como possíveis vetores mecânicos de helmintos em ambiente domiciliar e peridomiciliar. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 20: 1096-1102. [ Links ]
Turner, E. C. Jr.; P. L. Ruszler; P. Dillon; L. Carter & R. Youngman. 1992. House Fly Control. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 1: 242-250. [ Links ]
Velásquez, J. O.; B. Arango; N. Jaramillo; M. Franco; V. Molina & J. Cano. 2006. Plan de manejo ecoturístico del municipio de La Pintada. Corantioquia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 259 p. [ Links ]
Received 10/06/2009; accepted 12/07/2010
Editor: Rodrigo Krüger