SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 issue6Nursing professionals' anxiety and feelings in terminal situations in oncologyLong-Term Care Institutions for Elders and the health system author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

On-line version ISSN 1518-8345

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem vol.15 no.6 Ribeirão Preto Nov./Dec. 2007

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000600013 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

 

Expenditure survey on continued veno-venous hemodialysis procedure in the intensive care unit1

 

Lígia Maria dal SeccoI; Valéria CastilhoII

IRN, MS in Nursing, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, Medical School, Brazil
IIRN, PhD Professor, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, College of Nursing, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

This study aimed to characterize patients submitted to dialytic treatment with CVVHD in ICUs; monitor procedure time duration; estimate nurses' labor wages and; estimate the direct procedures mean costs. The study was developed in a public teaching hospital located in São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 93 procedures performed in 50 patients composed the sample. The results showed the predominance of male patients (62%); mean age was 60.8 years old; ICU hospitalization time was 19.2 days; 86% of the patients died; 76% of the patients presented acute renal insufficiency and, mean procedure time per patient was 1.9. The mean procedure duration was 26.6 hours. The mean cost of nurses' wages were R$ 592.04 which represented 28.7% of the total cost. The mean total expenditure was R$ 2,065.36 ranging from R$ 733.65 to R$ 6,994.18.

Descriptors: intensive care units; renal dialysis; costs and cost analysis


 

INTRODUCTION

Intensive Care Units (ICU) have been appointed as one of the most costly places in hospital organizations. Due to continuous and rapid advancements in technology, new equipments have been installed in these sectors, requiring sophisticated accessories and material, in addition to specialized personnel to operate them.

Dialysis treatment has also developed greatly, due to scientific and technological advances, and it has happened more and more frequently at ICUs.

Since the advent of dialysis treatments and ICUs, a steady increase in the severity of baseline diseases has been observed, which present Acute Renal Failure (ARF) as an associated complication(1).

ARF, which affects patients hospitalized at ICUs, presents a particular mortality and epidemiological profile(2). The Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN) informs that these patients' mortality is close to 50% and that the condition of current patients with ARF is more severe than formerly(3).

Despite efforts and investments in the area, the mortality of patients with ARF in ICUs remains high.

Renal substitution therapy is a complex procedure, demands precise equipment, specific material and duly trained professionals. It involves the multiprofessional ICU and Dialysis teams so that they can work together; because the first attends the patient directly and the later fully masters the specialty. Thus, the association between these parts is necessary in order to increase the actions' effect and save resources.

The limited availability of resources is a serious problem that affects not only public hospitals, which makes it necessary to identify the costs in care delivery. These data are essential for the management of hospital service costs, because this contributes in making decisions on the allocation of resources and future investments, in comparing and analyzing amounts paid by the SUS, which in turn can demonstrate the need for better funding allocation and also help in the negotiation of health plans and insurances.

Therefore, one of the great challenges in the health area is to find a balance between care quality and viable costs. The need to know the costs involved in care delivery is urgent in decision making on resource allocation(4).

Studies found in literature, which proposed to measure the costs of dialysis procedures in ICUs, use different methodologies. It was also verified that there is no standardization in the service structure for this kind of treatment in the countries studied(5-11) . In Brazil, studies were found that only focused only on costs of dialysis procedures for chronic renal patients.

This study aimed to estimate the mean direct cost of the most frequent dialysis procedure in the ICUs of a large public teaching hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. This procedure is continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), which corresponds to approximately 70% of the procedures performed in ICUs in the last two years.

This research aimed to characterize the clientele submitted to dialysis treatment with CVVHD in ICUs; estimate the length of the procedure; calculate the cost of nurses' work and estimate the direct mean cost of the procedures.

 

CASES AND METHOD

This is an exploratory, descriptive, retrospective, documental research with a qualitative approach, which analyzed the direct average cost of continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) procedures in patients with renal failure and who were submitted to this kind of procedure during their ICU stay.

The direct costs of nurses' work (category that performs the procedure), material, medications and solutions consumed during the procedure were computed.

The costs of complementary exams and medical work were not considered because this kind of amount was not accessible. The depreciation cost of equipments was not inferred because they are acquired through a loan for use agreement system, charging only the devices and catheters used.

The fee of indirect costs was not added to the procedure's total cost because the ICUs' costs are calculated together with those of the nursing wards.

This study was developed at a large teaching hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, which that delivers quaternary care and offers approximately 2,200 beds, divided in Institutes, one of them with around 120 ICU beds, divided in ten distinct units.

The research project was evaluated and authorized by the Institution's Project Analysis Committee.

The non-probabilistic intentional sample was composed of 93 procedures performed in 50 patients in the period from May 2005 to February 2006. This period was chosen because it is when the current hemodyalisis equipment started to be used at the ICUs.

For the data collection, an instrument composed of two parts was elaborated: one for the clients' demographic and clinical data; and the second part presented two worksheets: one for the registration of material and the other for the registration of medications and solutions consumed during the dialysis procedure in question, in addition to a space to take notes on occurrences.

Data were collection by the researcher from March 6 to May 31, 2006. The patients' files were analyzed by the researcher to complete the instrument.

Description of the procedure stages

Before data collection, the basic steps of the procedure were established with the Dialysis nurse: installation, maintenance and turnoff.

Installation

- Gather the necessary material;

- Position the dialysis machine close to the patient;

- Wash hands;

- Set up the specific Kit circuit of the equipment with the capillary dialyzer, faucet and simple equipment;

- Prime the system with physiological solution;

- Program the machine;

- Organize the extensions (threads), properly filled and occluded close to the catheter in order to connect them later;

- Wash hands;

- Put on mask;

- Put on non-sterile procedure gloves for removing the catheter dressing and discarding it, performing a visual inspection of the insertion site;

- Put on sterile gloves and clean the catheter with sterile gauze and antiseptic solution;

- Put on the sterile fenestrated field;

- Remove the occlusion covers from the catheter;

- Connect the syringe and declamp the route in order to aspire the heparine solution and test it by checking its permeability, one at a time;

- Connect the respective thread in each route, after disconnecting the syringe, respecting the flow the blood must follow;

- Turn on the equipment checking the system functioning with the program in course.

Maintenance

- Verify the patient's and machine vital parameters taking notes on a specific form of the Institution's dialysis procedures, every hour;

- Empty the dialysate and ultrafiltered volumes, performing partial and total balances of each bath on the specified form, every hour;

- The nurse must follow the time computed on the bath infusion pump equipment clock to control its length;

- Prepare, control and change dialysis solutions and others prescribed;

- Wash the system with physiological solution according to the medical prescription;

- When the alarm is set off, the nurse must attend to solve the problem, according to instructions in the equipment manual and, in case (s)he does not manage or is in doubt, (s)he must call the dialysis team.

Turnoff

- Gather the material to be used;

- Prepare syringes: of 10 ml with physiological solution or distilled water, and the 3 ml syringe with heparine;

- Turn off solutions according to medical prescriptions;

- Put on non-sterile gloves;

- Wash the system with physiological solution for returning blood in the arterial and venous routes;

- Wash hands;

- Put on mask;

- Put on gloves;

- Disconnect the extension of one of the catheter routes, inject physiological solution or distilled water and then inject 1.5 ml of heparine, clamp the route and connect the sterile occlusion cover, repeat the sequence with the other route;

- Put on sterile glove and proceed with the dressing with antiseptic solution, gauzes and occlude with microporous adhesive tape.

In general, for each dialysis procedure, there is one installation and one turnoff. The number and type of baths and anticoagulants varies in the maintenance procedure, according to the medical prescription and the patient's clinical conditions.

Computation of time and labor costs

It was determined by the Institution that the dialysis procedures should be performed by Nurses from the Units, after training and with constant supervision by the Dialysis Nurse.

For the estimation of time, the total hours spent on the realization of each procedure was considered because the nurse, besides his(er) direct intervention, supervises the patient during the dialysis and remains available in case problems occur.

For the estimation of salaries, data from the Institute's Human Resource Department were obtained, which provided: remuneration, total taxes and benefits of nurses from the ICU and Dialysis sectors. Next, the average of values and the average cost per hour were computed, which was R$ 22.50. Thus, to calculate the nurses' labor cost in each procedure, the hour cost of R$ 22.50 was multiplied by the total hours of each procedure.

Input cost calculation

In the analysis of each procedure registered on the patients' files, the quantities of material, medication and volumes of solutions used were computed and, next, this information was registered in a worksheet.

Unit cost data of the inputs were obtained by consulting the Material Administration System (MCS), an internal computer system. Some medications and solutions produced in the Institutions were consulted directly at the Pharmacy Division.

Three kinds of solutions can be used at the institution. Two are industrialized (peritoneal dialysis and lactate-based dialysis) and the other is prepared at the unit itself by the nurse who performs the procedure. Two kinds of solutions can be used for the anticoagulation: citrate and heparine solutions or, due to the patients' clinical condition, only washing the system with physiological solution more intensely, according to the medical prescription.

Some standards were set for the charge of some inputs, for example: the infusion pump is changed every 72 hours, according to institutional routine; a piece of 20cm of wide microporous adhesive tape used was considered in the turnoff for computation, and others.

After finishing the cost calculation of each of the 93 procedures in the data collection instrument, amounts were transferred to an electronic worksheet for analysis with the study variables.

 

RESULTS

Socio-Demographic and Clinical Characterization of Patients

Men predominated (62%) in the sample. The ARF diagnosis was described for 76% of the patients.

Regarding origin, 54% of the patients originated from nursing wards and 38% from the Emergency Room. The main motives for hospitalization at the ICU were: respiratory failure (30%), decreased level of consciousness (18%), post operative (16%) and septic shock (12%). In total, 86% died.

Table 1 shows that there was great variability in the sample regarding age, time of stay at the ICU and the quantity of procedures per patient.

 

 

Procedure Cost

It is observed in Table 2 that the average labor cost was R$ 592.04 and also presented great variability, because the length of the procedure directly influences the labor cost.

 

 

Therefore, it is concluded that the inputs cost (consumption material, medication and solutions) corresponded to almost three times the labor cost.

The total cost varied considerably, from R$ 733.65 to R$ 6,994.18, with an average cost of R$ 2,065.36. The input cost represented 71.3% of the total cost and labor 28.7%.

Table 3 presents the descriptive statistics of installation, turnoff, change of system and capillary dyalizer costs, considering only the procedures in which the system or capillary dialyzer were changed. Thus, the average cost was R$ 812.94 for procedures that included change of system. We verified that almost a third of the procedures needed change of system, while 43% of the procedures required change of capillary dyalizer.

 

 

Descriptive statistics of length and cost for each solution can be observed in Table 4, considering only procedures in which each solution was used. This way, for the procedures that used peritoneal dialysis solution, the average cost for this solution was R$ 167.23, which is the lowest of all solutions.

 

 

It is observed in Table 5 that, in the descriptive statistic of length and costs for each anticoagulant, only those procedures using the anticoagulant are considered. This way, the average cost for the procedures that used Citrate anticoagulant was R$ 131.41, which was the highest, but also represented the longest average time.

 

 

DISCUSSION

The study showed that the dialysis procedure is complex and involves many variables, which makes it difficult to estimate costs.

The main variables found in this study influencing procedure costs were: patients' clinical conditions; quantity of installations and turnoffs, changes in the system and capillary dyalizer.

The patients' clinical conditions mainly influence the length of the procedures, due to the flow of baths, and the alteration in the composition of dialysis solutions, which requires greater attention by the nursing team.

What is usually considered a dialysis session is its installation and turnoff. However, due to occurrences with patients or problems with equipment or material, the procedure can be interrupted in order to solve the problem, consequently leading to a new installation or change of part of the system, which increase costs and, more importantly, cause inconveniences and risks for the patient. These problems must also be evaluated by the medical and nursing team in order to avoid and diminish waste of material and human resources.

Considering the factors mentioned, a great variability of costs was found, which reinforces the need to study the stratification of costs and prices according to the variables found. Hospitals have charged the same amount for a procedure that ranged from 733.65 to R$ 6,994.18.

In view of the research results, it would be convenient if institutions, government, health operators and patients assessed the charge of the procedure by the number of installations and turnoffs and the development of the dialysis per hour. The hour cost of hemodialysis would be computed by the type of solution and anticoagulant, adding a fee for nursing and medical work.

 

CONCLUSIONS

The study results showed great variability of time and material used in the dialysis procedures.

The total cost varied from R$ 733.65 to R$ 6,994.18, with an average cost of R$ 2,065.36, while the inputs corresponded to 71.3% of total cost and 28% of labor.

This study presented several limitations, such as: exclusion of complementary exam cost and cost of extra replacements of medications and/or solutions; the exclusion of medical team work; the exclusion of equipments' depreciation cost; lack of opportunity for a detailed comparison of costs between types of solutions and anticoagulants used. Additionally, because it is a study using documental sources, there was some difficulty with unclear or dubious notations on the patients' files. Thus, this exploratory descriptive research needs to be broadened and replicated with a view to further knowledge and information.

However, this study offered important indications for the management of resources and costs in health and in nursing.

 

REFERENCES

1. Homsi E. Insuficiência renal aguda em UTI. São Paulo: Atheneu; 1998        [ Links ]

2. Lima EQ, Burdmann EA, Yu L. Adequação de diálise em insuficiência renal aguda. J Bras Nefrol. 2003;25(3):149-54.        [ Links ]

3. Yu L, Abensur H, Barros EJG, Homsi E, Burdmann EA, Cendoroglo Neto M et al. Insuficiência renal aguda: diretriz da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. J Bras Nefrol. 2002;24(1):37-9.        [ Links ]

4. Francisco IMF, Castilho V. A enfermagem e o gerenciamento de custos. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2002; 36(3):240-4.        [ Links ]

5. Bellomo R, Mehta R. Acute renal replacement in the intensive care unit: now and tomorrow. New Horiz. 1995; 3(4):760-7.        [ Links ]

6. van Bommel EFH, Bouvy ND, So KL, Zietse R, Vincent HH, Bruining HA, et al. Acute dialytic support for the critically ill: intermittent hemodialysis versus continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration. Am J Nephrol. 1995;15(3):192-200.        [ Links ]

7. Gilbert RW, Caruso DM, Foster KN, Canulla MV, Nelson ML, Gilbert EA. Development of a continuous renal replacement program in critically ill patients. Am J Surg. 2002; 184(6):526-32.        [ Links ]

8. Hamel MB, Philipps RS, Davis RB, Desbiens N, Connors AFJr, Teno JM et al. Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of initiating dialysis and continuing aggressive care in seriously ill hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127(3):195-202.        [ Links ]

9. Korkeila M, Ruokonen E, Takala J. Costs of care, long-term prognosis and quality of life in patients requiring renal replacement therapy during intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2000; 26(12):1824-31.        [ Links ]

10. Manns B, Doig CJ, Lee H, Dean S, Tonelli M, Johnson D et al. Cost of acute renal failure requiring dialysis in the intensive care unit: clinical and resource implications of renal recovery. Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31(2)449-55.        [ Links ]

11. Vitale C, Bagnis C, Marangella M, Belloni G, Lupo M, Spina G et al. Cost analysis of blood purification in intensive care units: continuous versus intermittent hemodiafiltration. J Neprhrol. 2003; 16(4):572-9.        [ Links ]

 

 

Recebido em: 30.8.2006
Aprovado em: 1.8.2007

 

 

1 Extracted from Master Thesis.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License