Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Determinant Factors of the Implementation of the Balanced Scorecard in Portugal: empirical evidence in public and private organizations

ABSTRACT

In this article we aim to identify and analyze a set of variables that can potentially influence the adoption of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) in Portugal. Hypotheses were tested using data obtained from a questionnaire sent to 591 publicly-owned organizations (local governments, municipal corporations and hospitals) and 549 privately-owned organizations (large companies and small and medium enterprises) in Portugal, with an overall response rate of 31.3%. The results allow us to conclude that although the majority of respondents claimed to know the BSC, its use in Portugal is still limited and very recent, particularly in the public sector organizations. However, it should be noted that its use has increased in Portugal in recent years. Using as theoretical framework the contingency and institutional theories, we found that decentralization, vertical differentiation and the degree of higher education are associated with the implementation of the BSC.

Keywords:
Balanced scorecard; Management accounting; Contingency theory; Institutional theory; Portugal

RESUMEN

Este artículo tiene como objetivo identificar y analizar un conjunto de variables que pueden influir en la adopción del Cuadro de Mando Integral (CMI) en Portugal. Las hipótesis se probaron utilizando el conjunto de datos obtenidos a partir de un cuestionario enviado a 591 organizaciones públicas (ayuntamientos, empresas municipales e intermunicipales y hospitales) y 549 organizaciones privadas (grandes empresas y pequeñas, y medianas empresas) que operan en Portugal, con una tasa de respuesta total del 31,3%. Los resultados obtenidos nos permiten concluir que aunque la mayoría de los encuestados ha afirmado conocer el CMI, su uso en Portugal es aún reducido y muy reciente, principalmente en el caso de las organizaciones pertenecientes al sector público. Sin embargo, conviene señalar que en los últimos años se ha registrado un aumento del uso del CMI en Portugal. Utilizando como enfoque teórico las teorías de contingencia e institucional, comprobamos que la descentralización, la diferenciación vertical y el grado de formación superior son factores que están asociados a la implementación del CMI.

Palabras-clave:
Cuadro de mando integral; Contabilidad de gestión; Teoría de contingencias; Teoría institucional; Portugal

RESUMO

Este artigo pretende identificar e analisar um conjunto de variáveis que podem potencialmente influenciar a adoção do Balanced Scorecard (BSC) em Portugal. As hipóteses definidas foram testadas utilizando dados obtidos a partir de um questionário enviado a 591 organizações públicas (câmaras municipais, empresas municipais e intermunicipais e hospitais) e 549 organizações privadas (grandes empresas e pequenas e médias empresas) que operam em Portugal, com uma taxa de resposta total de 31,3%. Os resultados permitem concluir que, embora a maioria dos entrevistados tenha afirmado conhecer o BSC, sua utilização em Portugal é ainda limitada e muito recente, particularmente nas organizações do setor público. Deve-se notar, no entanto, que sua utilização tem aumentado em Portugal nos últimos anos. Utilizando como referencial teórico as teorias da contingência e institucional, verificou-se que a descentralização, a diferenciação vertical e o grau de formação superior são fatores que estão associados à implementação do BSC.

Palavras-chave:
Balanced scorecard; Contabilidade de gestão; Teoria da contingência; Teoria institucional; Portugal

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

REFERENCIAS

  • ADLER, P.; BORYS, B. Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, Ithaca, v. 41, n. 1, p. 61-89, Mar. 1996.
  • AIBAR GUZMÁN, B. Aproximación contextual al diseño de un sistema general de información de gestión: estudio empírico de la gran empresa Gallega. 1997. 398 f. Tese (Doutoramento en Ciencias Empresariales)- Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, España, 1997.
  • AIBAR GUZMÁN, C. Análisis teórico de las implicaciones del modelo de nueva gestión pública en los sistemas de contabilidad de gestión. 2001. 337 f. Tese (Doutoramento en Ciencias Empresariales)- Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, España, 2001.
  • ARAÚJO, A. Diferenças na adoção da perspetiva teórica na condução de uma pesquisa científica: um ensaio teórico. Revista Read, Porto Alegre, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1-20, dez. 1999. Disponível em: <Disponível em: http://www.read.ea.ufrgs.br/edicoes/pdf/artigo_224.pdf >. Acesso em: 21 jul. 2008.
    » http://www.read.ea.ufrgs.br/edicoes/pdf/artigo_224.pdf
  • ATKINSON, A. et al. New directions in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, Sarasota, v. 9, p. 80-108, 1997.
  • BEDFORD, D. et al. Balanced scorecard design and performance impacts: some Australian evidence. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 17-36, 2008.
  • BHAGWAT, R.; SHARMA, M. Performance measurement of supply chain management: a balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, [S. l.], v. 53, n. 1, p. 43-62, Agu. 2007.
  • BIGLIARDI, B.; BOTTANI, E. Implementing the balanced scorecard in the mechanical industry: evidence from a case study. International Journal of Management & Decision Making, Washington, v. 11, n. 2, p. 140-162, Nov. 2010.
  • BISBE, J.; BARRUBÉS, J. The balanced scorecard as a management tool for assessing and monitoring strategy implementation in health care organizations. Revista Española de Cardiología, [S. l.], v. 65, n. 10, p. 919-927, Oct. 2012.
  • BLANCO, M.; AIBAR, B.; CANTORNA, S. El enfoque conductual contable y su reflejo en un cuadro de mando integral. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, Coruña, v. 18, n. 98, p. 77-104, enero/marzo 1999.
  • BORONAT OMBUENA, G. J.; SIMÓ BELENGUER, S. Modelos para el control de los intangibles empresariales. Estrategia Financiera, [S. l.], n. 222, p. 48-54, 2005.
  • BOURNE, M. et al. The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: perceptions of participating managers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Bradford, v. 22, n. 11, p. 1288-1310, 2002.
  • BRAAM, G.; NIJSSEN, E. Exploring antecedents of experimentation and implementation of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management and Organization,v. 17, n. 6, p. 714-728, Cambridge, 2011.
  • CHAN, Y. Performance measurement and adoption of the balanced scorecards: a survey of municipal governments in the Usa and Canada. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Bradford, v. 17, n.3, p. 201-222, 2004.
  • CHAN, Y.; HO, S. Performance measurement and the use of balanced scorecard in canadian hospitals. Advances in Management Accounting, [S. L.], v. 9, p. 145-169, 2000.
  • CHIA, A.; GOH, M.; HUM, S. Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced scorecard perspective. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Bradford, v. 16, n. 5, p. 605-620, 2009.
  • CHOW-CHUA, C.; GOH, M. Framework for evaluating performance and quality improvement in hospitals. Managing Service Quality, Bradford, v. 12, n. 1, p. 54-66, 2002.
  • DIMAGGIO, P.; POWELL, W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, Washington, D.C, v. 48, n. 2, p. 147-160, Apr. 1983.
  • ELMORE, R. The linkage between organizational size and the management accounting system. Akron Business and Economic Review, [S. L.], v. 21, n. 3, p. 69-80, 1990.
  • EPSTEIN, M.; MANZONI, J. The balanced scorecard and tableau de bord: translating strategy into action. Management Accounting, [S. l.], v. 79, n. 2, p. 28-36, Aug. 1997.
  • EXAME MELHORES E MAIORES. 500 maiores & melhores. Revista Exame, n. esp., out. 2008.
  • FARNETI, F.; GUTHRIE, J. Italian and Australian local governments: balanced scorecard practices. a research note. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, London, v. 12, n. 1, p. 4-13, 2008.
  • GEIGER, D.; ITTNER, C. The influence of funding source and legislative requirements on government cost accounting practices. Accounting, Organizations and Society, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 6, p. 549-567, Aug. 1996.
  • GOMES, C. A contabilidade de gestão e o custeio baseado nas actividades nas grandes empresas portuguesas: os determinantes do custeio baseado nas actividades. 2007. 353 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Empresariais)- Escola de Economia e Gestão, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2007.
  • GOSSELIN, M. The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, [S. L.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 105-122, Feb. 1997.
  • GRANLUND, M. Towards explaining stability in and around management accounting systems. Management Accounting Research, London, v. 12, n. 2, p. 141-166, June 2001.
  • GREILING, D. Balanced scorecard implementation in german non-profit organisations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Bradford, v. 59, n. 6, p. 534-554, 2010.
  • GRIFFITHS, J. Balanced scorecard use in new zealand government departments and crown entities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, [S. l.], v. 62, n. 4, p. 70-79, Dec. 2003.
  • HENDRICKS, K. et al. Adoption of the balanced scorecard: a contingency variables analysis. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Chichester, v. 29, n. 2, p. 124-138, June 2012.
  • HO, S.; CHAN, Y. Performance measurement and the implementation of balanced scorecards in municipal governments. The Journal of Government Financial Management, Alexandria, v. 51, n. 4, p. 8-19, Jan. 2002.
  • HOQUE, Z.; JAMES, W. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, Sarasota, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1-17, Dec. 2000.
  • HOQUE, Z.; MIA, L.; ALAM, M. Market competition, computer-aided manufacturing and use of multiple performance measures: an empirical study. The British Accounting Review, London, v. 33, n. 1, p. 23-45, Mar. 2001.
  • ITTNER, C.; LARCKER, D.; MEYER, M. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review, Pittsburgh, v. 78, n. 3, p. 725-758, July 2003.
  • JORDAN, H.; NEVES, J.; RODRIGUES, J. O controlo de gestão ao serviço da estratégia e dos gestores. Lisboa: Áreas Editora, 2011.
  • KAPLAN, R. Presente y Futuro del Cuadro de Mando Integral: entrevista com Robert Kaplan. Harvard Deusto, Finanzas & Contabilidad, [S. l.], n. 48, p. 75-80, July/Aug. 2002.
  • KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D. Mapas estratégicos: convirtiendo los activos intangibles en resultados tangibles. Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión2000, 2004.
  • KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D. Cómo utilizar el cuadro de mando integral para implantar y gestionar la estrategia. Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión2000 , 2001.
  • KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D. Having Trouble with Your Strategy? Then Map It. Harvard Business Review, Boston, v. 78, n. 5, p.167-176, 2000.
  • KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D. Translating strategy into action: the balanced scorecard. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
  • KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, Boston, v. 71, n. 5, p. 134-147, Sept. 1993.
  • KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, Boston, v. 70, n. 1, p.71-79, 1992.
  • KASPERSKAYA, Y. Implementing the balanced scorecards: a comparative study of two spanish city councils - an institutional perspective. Financial Accountability & Management, Oxford, v. 24, n. 4, p. 363-384, Nov. 2008.
  • KIDWELL, L. et al. New management techniques: an international comparison. The CPA Journal, New York, v. 72, n. 2, p. 63-66, Feb. 2002.
  • KOLLBERG, B.; ELG, M. The practice of the balanced scorecard in health care services. International Journal of Productivity and Performance, Bradford, v. 60, n. 5, p. 427-445, 2011.
  • LAPSLEY, I.; WRIGHT, E. The diffusion of management accounting innovation in the public sector: a research agenda. Management Accounting Research, London, v. 15, n. 3, p. 355-374, Sept. 2004.
  • LAVARDA, C. E. F.; BARRACHINA, M.; FELIU, V. M. R. Paradigmas de investigación en contabilidad de gestión. Revista de Contabilidade do Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis da UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-18, jan./abr. 2008.
  • LETZA, S. R. The design and implementation of the balanced business scorecard: an analysis of three companies in practice. Business Process Re-Engineering & Management Journal, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 3, p. 54-78, 1996.
  • LUFT, J.; SHIELDS, M. Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, [S. l.], v. 28, n. 2/3, p. 169-249, Feb./ Apr. 2003.
  • MACHADO, M. J. C. V. Balanced scorecard: an empirical study of small and medium size enterprises. RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, São Paulo, v. 15, n. 46, p. 129-148, jan./mar. 2013.
  • MARKUS, M.; PFEFFER, J. Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 2/3, p. 205-219, 1983.
  • MALMI, T. Balanced scorecards in finnish companies: a research note. Management Accounting Research, London, v. 12, n. 2, p.207-220, June 2001.
  • MOORAJ, S.; OYON, D.; HOSTETTLER, D. The balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil?. European Management Journal, Oxford, v. 17, n. 5, p. 481-491, Oct. 1999.
  • NIVEN, P. El cuadro de mando integral paso a paso. Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión2000 , 2003.
  • O’CONNOR, N. G.; CHOW, C. W.; WU, A. The adoption of western management accounting/controls in china’s state-owned enterprises during economic transition. Accounting, Organizations and Society, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 3/4, p. 349-375, Apr./ May 2004.
  • OLSON, E.; SLATER, S. The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy and performance. Business Horizons, Greenwich, v. 45, n. 3, p. 11-16, May/ June 2002.
  • PIMENTEL, L.; MAJOR, M. Management accounting change in a portuguese service company. Revista Contabilidade e Gestão, [S. l.], n. 8, p. 89-109, 2009.
  • PINENO, C.J. Balanced scorecard applications and model building: a survey and comparison of the manufactured homes and motor homes industries. Management Accounting Quarterly, [S. L.], v. 6, n.1, p. 21-28, Nov. 2004.
  • QUESADO, P. R.O contributo do balanced scorecard para a gestão estratégica de custos: uma análise empírica às grandes empresas portuguesas. 2005. 327 f. . Dissertação (Mestrado em Contabilidade e Auditoria)- Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2005.
  • QUESADO, P. R.; RODRIGUES, L. L. Factores determinantes na implementação do balanced scorecard em grandes empresas portuguesas. Revista Universo Contábil, Blumenau, v. 5, n. 4, p. 94-115, out./dez. 2009.
  • RAUTIAINEN, A. I. The interrelations of decision-making rationales around bsc adoptions in finnish municipalities. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Bradford, v. 58, n. 8, p. 787-802, 2009.
  • RHODES, J.; WALSH, P.; LOK, P. Convergence and divergence issues in strategic management -Indonesia’s experience with the balanced scorecard in hr management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, London, v. 19, n. 6, p. 1170-1185, Jun. 2008.
  • RUSSO, J. Balanced scorecard para pme e pequenas e médias instituições. Lisboa: Lidel Edições Técnicas, 2009.
  • RUSSO, J.; MARTINS, A. A aplicabilidade do balanced scorecard nas PME: o caso da indústria transformadora de matérias plásticas do centro litoral de Portugal. Jornal de Contabilidade, [S.l.], n. 344, p. 401-418, 2005.
  • SANTOS, R. Balanced scorecard em portugal: visão, estratégia e entusiasmo. Lisboa: Gestão Plus Edições, 2006.
  • SCOTT, W. R. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, Ithaca, v. 32, n. 4, p. 493-511, Dec. 1987.
  • SHIELDS, M. D. Management accounting practices in Europe: a perspective from the states. Management Accounting Research, London, v. 9, n. 4, p. 501-513, Dec. 1998.
  • SILVA, C. A utilização e o conhecimento do balanced scorecard em portugal: uma análise empírica ao mapa da estratégia das empresas portuguesas. 2003. 237 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Contabilidade e Administração)-Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2003.
  • SOUSA, M. G. P. A aplicação do balanced scorecard em Portugal. 2001. 266 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Empresariais)- Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal, 2001.
  • SPECKBACHER, G.; BISCHOF, J.; PFEIFFER, T. A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecards in german-speaking countries. Management Accounting Research, London, v. 14, n. 4, p.361-387, Dec. 2003.
  • SPECKBACHER, G.; WENTGES, P. The impact of family control on the use of performance measures in strategic target setting and incentive compensation: a research note. Management Accounting Research, London, v. 23, n. 1, p. 34-46, Mar. 2012.
  • TAPINOS, E.; DYSON, R. G.; MEADOWS, M. Does the balanced scorecard make a difference to the strategy development process? The Journal of the Operational Research Society, Basingstoke, v. 62, n. 5, p. 888-899, Aug. 2011.
  • TORRES, J. L. B.; FEMENÍAS, L. B. Sistemas de información de gestión en el sector público: el cuadro de mando integral en las universidades públicas españolas. Revista Iberoamericana de Contabilidad de Gestión, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 9, p. 81-106, 2007.
  • UKKO, J.; TENHUNEN, J.; RANTANEN, H. Performance measurement impacts on management and leadership: perspectives of management and employees. International Journal of Production Economics, Amsterdam, v. 110, n. 1/2, p. 39-51, Oct. 2007.
  • WENISCH, S. The diffusion of a balanced scorecard in a divisionalized firm: adoption and implementation in a practical context. 2004. 275 f. Tese (Doutorado em Business Administration)- Umeå University, Sweden, 2004.
  • YAP, C. et al. A comparison of systemwide and hospital-specific performance measurement tools. Journal of Healthcare Management, Chicago, v. 50, n. 4, p. 251-263, July/ Aug. 2005.
  • 6
    Processo de avaliação: Double Blind Review
  • 1.
    We have selected the works that seemed to us more relevant from the viewpoint of our investigation objectives. We actually highlighted those studies conducted with the use of a questionnaire.
  • 2.
    Considering the small number of sample organizations that are in that situation, we will present all the results grouped per sector: private (big companies and SMES) and public (local governments, MC/IMC and hospitals).

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Apr-Jun 2014

History

  • Received
    15 Apr 2012
  • Accepted
    14 Apr 2014
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado, Av. da Liberdade, 532, 01.502-001 , São Paulo, SP, Brasil , (+55 11) 3272-2340 , (+55 11) 3272-2302, (+55 11) 3272-2302 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbgn@fecap.br