Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Innovation performance in service companies and KIBS vis-à-vis manufacturing: the relevance of absorptive capacity and openness

Abstract

Purpose:

The present paper adds to the most recent current of literature that highlights the importance of innovation in services, analyzing a setting - Portugal - which is relatively backward in terms of innovation performance.

Design/methodology/approach:

Based on a sample of 4128 companies (including 1489 service companies) that answered the Community Innovation Survey 2008, we assessed, by resorting to logistic regressions, the determinants of innovation performance in Portuguese companies.

Findings:

1) Workers who have the 1st cycle of higher education have a positive and significant impact on the innovation of service companies whereas PhDs are detrimental to companies’ innovative performance; 2) Companies in the service sector in general, and in KIBS in particular, that effectively invest in external and (continuous) internal R&D activities are more innovative; 3) External scientific sources of information for innovation are crucial (and much more than in manufacturing) to the innovation performance of service companies, especially of KIBS; 4) Similarly to manufacturing, participation in innovation activities in cooperation with foreign partners appears as a key factor in the innovative performance of service companies.

Originality/value:

The study demonstrates the influence of companies’ openness and the relative importance attributed to different sources of information for innovation on innovation outcomes of service companies (and KIBS) compared to manufacturing industries.

Keywords:
Innovation performance; Services; KIBS; Manufacturing; Portugal

Resumo

Objetivo:

O presente trabalho tem por objetivo contribuir para a mais recente corrente de literatura que destaca a importância da inovação nos serviços, analisando um contexto - Portugal - caracterizado por um relativo atraso em termos de desempenho inovador.

Metodologia:

Com base em uma amostra de 4.128 empresas (incluindo 1.489 de serviços) que responderam à Pesquisa Comunitária sobre Inovação (PCI/CIS) 2008, avaliamos, recorrendo a regressões logísticas, os determinantes do desempenho da inovação nas empresas portuguesas.

Resultados:

1) Os trabalhadores que possuem o 1º ciclo do ensino superior têm um impacto positivo e significativo na inovação das empresas de serviços, ao passo que os doutorados são prejudiciais para o desempenho inovador das empresas; 2) as empresas do setor dos serviços em geral, e as dos KIBS em particular, que efetivamente investem em atividade de P&D externa e interna são mais inovadoras; 3) fontes científicas externas de informação para inovação são críticas (e muito mais do que na indústria transformadora) para o desempenho inovador das empresas de serviços, especialmente dos KIBS; 4) da mesma forma para a indústria transformadora, a participação em atividades de inovação em cooperação com parceiros estrangeiros emerge como um fator-chave para o desempenho inovador das empresas de serviços.

Contribuições:

Explicita a influência de abertura das empresas e a importância relativa atribuída às distintas fontes de informação para a inovação nos resultados de inovação das empresas de serviços (e KIBS) face às empresas da indústria transformadora.

Palavras-chave:
Desempenho de inovação; Serviços; KIBS; Indústria Transformadora; Portugal

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

Referências

  • Aboal, D., Bravo-Ortega, C., & Cresp, G. (2015). Innovation in the services sector. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 51(3), 537-539.
  • Agut, S., Peiró, J. M., & Grau, R. (2009). The effect of overeducation on job content innovation and career-enhancing strategies among young Spanish employees. Journal of Career Development, 36(2), 159-182.
  • Álvarez, R., Bravo-Ortega, C., & Zahler, A. (2015). Innovation and productivity in services: Evidence from Chile. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3), 593-611.
  • Añón Higón, D. (2016). In-house versus external basic research and first-to-market innovations. Research Policy, 45(4), 816-829.
  • Arundel, A., Kanerva, M., Cruysen, A.V., & Hollanders, H. (2007). Innovation statistics for the European service sector [Report Inno Metrics]. UNU-MERIT Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.seeproject.org/images/Innovation%20Statistics%20for%20the%20European%20Service%20Sector.pdf
    » http://www.seeproject.org/images/Innovation%20Statistics%20for%20the%20European%20Service%20Sector.pdf
  • Arvanitis, S., & Bolli, T. (2012). A comparison of national and international innovation cooperation in five European countries. Review of Industrial Organization, 43(3), 163-191.
  • Barras, R. (1986). Towards a theory of innovation in services. Research Policy, 15(4), 161-173.
  • Barroca, A., Meireles, G. & Neto, C. (2015). A empregabilidade dos doutorados nas empresas portuguesas Porto: Advanced Business Services. Retrieved from http://www.empregabilidadedoutorados.com/
    » http://www.empregabilidadedoutorados.com/
  • Battisti, G., Gallego, J., Rubalcaba, L. & Windrum, P. (2015). Open innovation in services: Knowledge sources, intellectual property rights and internationalization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(3), 223-247.
  • Becker, G. S. (1983). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Broekel, T., & Brenner, T. (2011). Regional factors and innovativeness: An empirical analysis of four German industries. The Annals of Regional Science, 47(1), 169-194.
  • Bryson, J., & Monnoyer, M. (2004). Understanding the relationship between services and innovation: The RESER review of the European service literature on innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 24(1), 205-222.
  • Cáceres, R., & Guzmán, J. (2014). Seeking an innovation structure common to both manufacturing and services. Service Business, 9(3), 361-379.
  • Camacho, J., & Rodríguez, M. (2005). How innovative are services? An empirical analysis for Spain. The Service Industries Journal, 25(2), 253-271.
  • Carlborg, P., Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2014). The evolution of service innovation research: A critical review and synthesis. Service Industries Journal, 34(5), 373-398.
  • Carvalho, L., Costa, T., & Caiado, J. (2013). Determinants of innovation in a small open economy: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(3), 583-600.
  • Castellacci, F. (2010). The internationalization of companies in the service industries: Channels, determinants and sectoral patterns. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(3), 500-513.
  • Castro, L. M., Montoro-Sanchez, A., & Criado, M. O. (2011). Innovation in services industries: Current and future trends. The Service Industries Journal, 31(1), 7-20.
  • Chang, Y.-C., Linton, J. D., & Chen, M.-N. (2012). Service regime: An empirical analysis of innovation patterns in service firms. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(9), 1569-1582
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
  • Coombs, R., & Miles, I., (2000). Innovation, measurement and services, the new problematic. In J. S. Metcalfe & I. Miles (Eds.), Innovation systems in the service economy: Measurement and case study analysis (pp. 85-103). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Crevani, L., Palm, K., & Schilling, A. (2011). Innovation management in service firms: A research agenda. Service Business, 5(2), 177-193.
  • Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., & Woehr, D. J. (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443-456.
  • Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2003). Business services in Germany: Bridges for innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 23(2), 1-30.
  • Dautel, V., & Walther, O. (2014). The geography of innovation in the Luxembourg metropolitan region, an intra-regional approach. Papers in Regional Science, 93(4), 703-725.
  • De Fuentes, C., Dutrenit, G., Santiago, F., & Gras, N. (2015). Determinants of innovation and productivity in the service sector in Mexico. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3), 578-592.
  • Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2001). Patterns of innovation organisation in service firms: Postal survey results and theoretical models. Science and Public Policy, 28(1), 57-67.
  • Djellal, F., Gallouj, F., & Miles, I. (2013). Two decades of research on innovation in services: Which place for public services? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 98-117.
  • Drejer, I. (2004). Identifying innovation in surveys of services: A Schumpeterian perspective. Research Policy, 33(3), 551-562.
  • Droege, H., Hildebrand, D., & Forcada, M. (2009). Innovation in services: Present findings, and future pathways. Journal of Service Management, 20(2), 131-155.
  • Evangelista, R., & Vezzani, A. (2010). The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations: A firm-level analysis. Research Policy, 39(10), 1253-1263.
  • Fontes, M., & Coombs, R. (2001). Contribution of new technology-based firms to the strengthening of technological capabilities in intermediate economies. Research Policy 30(1), 79-97.
  • Forsman, H. (2011). Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises: A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research Policy, 40(5), 739-750.
  • Freel, M. (2005). Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms. Technovation, 25(2), 123-134.
  • Gallego, J. M., Gutiérrez, L. H., & Taborda, R. (2015). Innovation and productivity in the Colombian service and manufacturing industries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3), 612-634.
  • Gallego, J. M., Rubalcaba, L., & Hipp, C. (2013a). Services and organisational innovation: The right mix for value creation. Management Decision, 51(6), 1117-1134.
  • Gallego, J. M., Rubalcaba, L., & Suarez, C. (2013b). Knowledge for innovation in Europe: The role of external knowledge on firms’ cooperation strategies. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2034-2041.
  • Gallouj, F. (2002a). Innovation in services and the attendant old and new myths. Journal of Socio-Economics 31(2), 137-154.
  • Gallouj, F. (2002b). Innovation in the service economy: The new wealth of nations Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Gallouj, F., & Savona, M. (2009). Innovation in services: A review of the debate and a research agenda. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 149-172.
  • Gallouj, F., Weber, K. M., Stare, M., & Rubalcaba, L. (2015). The futures of the service economy in Europe: A foresight analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 80-96.
  • Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 537-556.
  • García-Quevedo, J., Mas-Verdu, F., & Polo-Otero, J. (2012). Which firms want PhDs? An analysis of the determinants of the demand. Higher Education, 63(5), 607-620.
  • García-Quevedo, J., Pellegrino, G., & Vivarelli, M. (2014). R&D drivers and age: Are young firms different?. Research Policy, 43(9), 1544-1556.
  • Gomes, C., Kruglianskas, I., & Scherer, F. (2011). Gestão das fontes externas de informação: Uma análise dos fatores que influenciam o desempenho inovador. Gestão & Produção, 18(4), 897-910.
  • Gómez, J., & Murguia, C. (2010). Vínculos de cooperación como fuente de información para la innovación. Cuadernos de Administración, 23(41), 61-79.
  • He, Z. L., Wong, P. K. (2009), Knowledge interaction with manufacturing clients and innovation of knowledge-intensive business services firms. Innovation, Management, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 264-278.
  • Herrera, L., & Nieto, M. (2015). The determinants of firms’ PhD recruitment to undertake R&D activities. European Management Journal, 33(2), 132-142.
  • Hertog, P. den, Aa, W. van der, & Jong. M. (2010). Capabilities for managing service innovation: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 490-514.
  • Hsueh, J., Lin, N., & Li, H. (2010). The effects of network embeddedness on service innovation performance. The Service Industries Journal, 30(10), 1723-1736.
  • Janeiro, P., Proença, I., & Gonçalves, V. C. (2013). Open innovation: Factors explaining universities as service firm innovation sources. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2017-2023.
  • Jong, J. P. J., Bruins, A., Dolfsma, W., & Meijaard, J. (2003). Innovation in service firms explored: What, how and why? [Strategic Study B2002205], EIM Business & Policy Research, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.
  • Kulkarni, M., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Martinez, P.G. (2015). Overqualification, mismatched qualification, and hiring decisions: Perceptions of employers. Personnel Review, 44(4), 529- 549.
  • Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201-1215.
  • Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., Nosella, A., & Pellegrini, L. (2016). Collaborations with scientific partners: The mediating role of the social context in fostering innovation performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 142-156.
  • Leiponen, A. (2012). The benefits of R&D and breadth in innovation strategies: A comparison of finnish service and manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1255-1281.
  • López, A., & Ramos, D. (2015). Innovation in services: The case of rural tourism in Argentina. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 51(3), 635-646.
  • López, S. F, Astray, B. P., Pazos, D. R., & Calvo, N. (2015). Are firms interested in collaborating with universities? An open-innovation perspective in countries of the South West European Space. Service Business, 9(4), 637-662.
  • Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Bryson, J. R. (2011). Openness, knowledge, innovation and growth in UK business services. Research Policy, 40(10), 1438-1452.
  • Máñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis-Llopis, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2015). The determinants of R&D persistence in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 44(3), 505-528.
  • Marin, H. J. L., & Bermejo, L.R. (2015). External sources for innovation in public organisations. The Service Industries Journal, 35(13), 710-727.
  • McGuirk, H., Lenihan, H. & Hart, M. (2015). Measuring the impact of innovative human capital on small firms’ propensity to innovate. Research Policy, 44(4), 965-976.
  • Moreira, J., Silva, M. J., Simões, J., & Sousa, G. (2012). Drivers of marketing innovation in Portuguese firms. The Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 14(31), 195-206.
  • Nardelli, G. (2015). The interactions between information and communication technologies and innovation in services: A conceptual typology. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 7(3), 15-39.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005a). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). France. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5889925/OSLO-EN.PDF
    » http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5889925/OSLO-EN.PDF
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005b). Promoting innovation in services [Working party on innovation and technology policy, DSTI/STP/TIP(2004)4/Final]. OECD Publications, Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/35509923.pdf
    » http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/35509923.pdf
  • Pires, C., Sarkar, S., & Carvalho, L. (2008). Innovation in services: how different from manufacturing? The Service Industries Journal, 28(10), 1339-1356.
  • Robinson, S., & Stubberud, H. (2011). Sources of information and cooperation for innovation in Norway. Journal of International Business Research, 10(2), 91-102.
  • Rubalcaba, L., Gago, D., & Gallego, J. (2010). On the differences between goods and services innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics, 1(5), 17-40.
  • Schmidt, T., & Rammer, C. (2006). The determinants and effects of technological and non-technological innovations: Evidence from the German CIS IV. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/37450197.pdf
    » http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/37450197.pdf
  • Schneider, L., Gunther, J., & Brandenbury, B. (2010). Innovation and skills from a sectoral perspective: A linked employer-employee analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(2), 185-202.
  • Shearmur, R., & Doloreux, D. (2009). Place, space and distance: Towards a geography of knowledge-intensive business services innovation. Industry and Innovation, 16(1), 79-102.
  • Sirilli, G., & Evangelista, R. (1998). Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: Results from Italian surveys. Research Policy, 27(9), 881-899.
  • Sternberg, R., & Arndt, O. (2001). The firm or the region: What determines the innovation behavior of European firms? Economic Geography, 77(4), 364-382.
  • Sundbo, J. (2000). Organization and innovation strategy in services. In M. Boden & I. Miles (Eds.), Services and the Knowledge-Based Economy (pp. 109-128). New York: Continuum.
  • Tacsir, E. (2011). Innovation in services: The hard case for Latin America and the Caribbean [Discussion paper, n. IDB-DP-203]. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/5081/IDBDP203%20Innovation%20in%20Services.pdf?sequence=1
    » https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/5081/IDBDP203%20Innovation%20in%20Services.pdf?sequence=1
  • Teixeira, A. A. C., & Mota, L. (2012). A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university-industry links. Scientometrics, 93(3), 719-743.
  • Teixeira, A. A. C., & Tavares-Lehmann, A. T. (2014). Human capital intensity in technology-based firms located in Portugal: Does foreign ownership matter? Research Policy, 43(4), 737-748.
  • Tether, B. S. (2005). Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European innobarometer survey. Industry and Innovation, 12(2), 153-184.
  • Tether, B. S., & Howells, J. (2007). Changing understanding of innovation in services [DTI Occasional Paper, n. 9]. Innovation in Services, Department of Trade and Industry, Manchester.
  • Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public sciencebase. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 1079-1095.
  • Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. The Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887-902.
  • Trigo, A., & Vence, X. (2012). Scope and patterns of innovation cooperation in Spanish service enterprises. Research Policy, 41(3), 602-613.
  • Un, C., & Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2010). Public funding for product, process and organizational innovation in service industries. The Service Industries Journal, 30(1), 133-147.
  • Uppenberg, K., & Strauss, H. (2010). Innovation and Productivity Growth in the EU Services Sector. European Investment Bank. Retrieved from http://www.eib.org/attachments/efs/efs_innovation_and_productivity_en.pdf
    » http://www.eib.org/attachments/efs/efs_innovation_and_productivity_en.pdf
  • Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128-154.
  • Vergori, A. S. (2014). Measuring innovation in services: The role of surveys. The Service Industries Journal, 34(2), 145-161.
  • Vermeulen, P. A. M., De Jong, J. P. J., & O’Shaughnessy, K. C. (2005). Identifying key determinants for new product introductions and firms perfomance in small service firms. The Service Industries Journal, 25(5), 625-640.
  • Vinding, A. L. (2006). Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4-5), 507-517.
  • West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation and Management, 31(4), 814-831.
  • Xie, X.-J., Pendergast, J., & Clarke, W. (2008). Increasing the power: A practical approach to goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression models with continuous predictors. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52(5), 2703-2713.
  • Yamakawa, P., & Ostos, J. (2013). The influence of the environment on organizational innovation in service companies in Peru. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negocios/Review of Business Management, 15(49), 582-600.
  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
  • Zahler, A., Iacovone, L., & Mattoo, A. (2014). Trade and innovation in services: Evidence from a developing economy. World Economy, 37(7), 953-979.
  • 13
    Evaluation process: Double Blind Review
  • Supporting Agencies: This research has been financed by Portuguese Public Funds through FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) in the framework of the UID/ECO/04105/2013 project.
  • 1
    ‘Droege et al. (2009) make a distinction between technologist and assimilation, whereas Djellal et al. (2013) mention an additional (the inversion) approach which emphasises the fundamental role of certain Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) in other sectors’ innovations.
  • 2
    Freel (2005) considers that novel innovation is the new innovation for the industry (both in terms of product and process), and incremental innovation is new only to the company introducing it.
  • 3
    Pires et al. (2008) advocate two types of innovation for products: pioneering innovation if the company has introduced a new innovation in the market, i.e., has introduced a product or service that is not a mere imitation of an already existing one; and product innovation, if the innovation introduced is new for the company alone.
  • 4
    In their analysis, the authors considered two types of innovation: technological innovation (product innovation + process innovation) and non-technological innovation (organizational and marketing innovation).
  • 5
    The authors consider 7 main types of information sources: internal to the company (e.g., know-how, work organization and communication within the company), cooperation relationships (with clients, suppliers, consultants, banks, among others), regional organization of knowledge (e.g., local university and research institutes), regional support organization (e.g., regional association of entrepreneurs and business incubators), financial support organizations (organizations that encourage innovation), national support organizations (e.g., national confederation of Finnish industries and chamber of commerce) and, finally, other external sources of information (e.g., fairs, congresses, internet, media, literature).
  • 6
    In this work, Laursen and Salter (2004) created an index to measure the openness of English industrial firms to knowledge from their external environment. Thus, the greater the number of external information sources used by a company, the greater its “openness” to the attraction of this type of knowledge generated from the outside.
  • 7Since 1996 Portugal has been allocating public funds for the encouraging the professional insertion of PhDs in companies. However, by 2006 almost 70% of the companies that had hired their first PhD failed to apply to any R&D project managed by Portugal National Innovation Agency (AdI) (Barroca et al., 2015).

Contribution of each Authors:

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Jan-Mar 2016

History

  • Received
    18 Oct 2014
  • Accepted
    11 Apr 2016
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado, Av. da Liberdade, 532, 01.502-001 , São Paulo, SP, Brasil , (+55 11) 3272-2340 , (+55 11) 3272-2302, (+55 11) 3272-2302 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbgn@fecap.br