Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Is curtobacterium wilt biocontrol temperature dependent?

O biocontrole da murcha-de-curtobacterium é dependente da temperatura?

Abstracts

Abiotic stress interferes with plant-microbial interactions, but some microorganisms may buffer this interference. We investigated the interaction between temperature and bacterial wilt (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens - Cff) biocontrol and the ability of Bacillus subtilis strain ALB629 to colonize bean seedlings, to inhibit pathogen growth and to use different C and N sources. B. subtilis ALB629rif, a mutant selected from the wild population of ALB629, was used to monitor plant colonization at 20°C and 30°C. ALB629rif was detected only in the plant roots (10(3.22) CFU g-1) at the lower temperature but colonized the roots, stems, and leaves (10(5.85), 10(4.48), and 10(4.01) CFU g-1), respectively, at 30ºC. The area under the disease progress curve was also different at the two tested temperatures (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, the disease reduction using ALB629rif - treated seeds was similar: 71% and 75%, respectively, at 20 and 30ºC (p < 0.01). A higher efficiency of C and N source utilization was observed at the higher temperature, but the antagonist inhibited Cff growth equally at either temperature in vitro. Based on our results, temperature interferes with pathogen and antagonist plant colonization, but the overall suppression of bacterial wilt appears to be stabilized by ALB629.

seed treatment; Phaseolus vulgaris; antibiosis; temperature; rhizobacteria; PGPR


Estresses abióticos interferem nas interações micro-organismo e, mas alguns micro-organismos podem amenizar estes efeitos. Foi investigada a interação entre temperatura e controle biológico da murcha-de-curtobacterium (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens - Cff) e a capacidade de Bacillus subtilis isolado ALB629 em colonizar plântulas de feijão, inibir o crescimento do patógeno e usar diferentes fontes de nutrientes. B. subtilis ALB629rif, isolado mutante selecionado da população selvagem de ALB629 foi utilizado para rastrear a colonização da planta a 20 e 30ºC. ALB629rif foi detectado apenas nas raízes (10(3,22) UFC g-1) na menor temperatura enquanto que a 30ºC, ALB629rif colonizou as raízes, caules e folhas (10(5.85), 10(4.48) e 10(4.01) UFC g-1), respectivamente. A AACPD foi diferente nas duas temperaturas testadas (p < 0,01). No entanto, a redução da doença obtida pelo tratamento de sementes com ALB629rif foi semelhante de 71% e 75%, respectivamente a 20 e 30ºC (p < 0,01). Uma maior eficiência de utilização de fontes de C e N foi observada na temperatura mais elevada, mas o antagonista igualmente inibiu o crescimento de Cff in vitro em qualquer temperatura. Portanto, a temperatura interfere na colonização da planta pelo patógeno e pelo antagonista, mas a supressão da murcha-de-curtabacterium de modo geral parece ser estabilizado por ALB629.

tratamento de sementes; Phaseolus vulgaris; antibiose; temperatura; rizobactéria; BPCP


FITOSSANIDADE/CROP PROTECTION

Is curtobacterium wilt biocontrol temperature dependent?

O biocontrole da murcha-de-curtobacterium é dependente da temperatura?

Samuel Julio MartinsI; Flávio Henrique Vasconcelos MedeirosI, * * Author for correspondence. E-mail: flaviomedeiros@dfp.ufla.br ; Ricardo Magela SouzaI; Laíze Aparecida Ferreira VilelaII

IDepartamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário, 3037, 37200-000, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil

IIDepartamento de Ciências do Solo, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Abiotic stress interferes with plant-microbial interactions, but some microorganisms may buffer this interference. We investigated the interaction between temperature and bacterial wilt (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens - Cff) biocontrol and the ability of Bacillus subtilis strain ALB629 to colonize bean seedlings, to inhibit pathogen growth and to use different C and N sources. B. subtilis ALB629rif, a mutant selected from the wild population of ALB629, was used to monitor plant colonization at 20°C and 30°C. ALB629rif was detected only in the plant roots (103.22 CFU g-1) at the lower temperature but colonized the roots, stems, and leaves (105.85, 104.48, and 104.01 CFU g-1), respectively, at 30ºC. The area under the disease progress curve was also different at the two tested temperatures (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, the disease reduction using ALB629rif - treated seeds was similar: 71% and 75%, respectively, at 20 and 30ºC (p < 0.01). A higher efficiency of C and N source utilization was observed at the higher temperature, but the antagonist inhibited Cff growth equally at either temperature in vitro. Based on our results, temperature interferes with pathogen and antagonist plant colonization, but the overall suppression of bacterial wilt appears to be stabilized by ALB629.

Keywords: seed treatment, Phaseolus vulgaris, antibiosis, temperature, rhizobacteria, PGPR.

RESUMO

Estresses abióticos interferem nas interações micro-organismo e, mas alguns micro-organismos podem amenizar estes efeitos. Foi investigada a interação entre temperatura e controle biológico da murcha-de-curtobacterium (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens - Cff) e a capacidade de Bacillus subtilis isolado ALB629 em colonizar plântulas de feijão, inibir o crescimento do patógeno e usar diferentes fontes de nutrientes. B. subtilis ALB629rif, isolado mutante selecionado da população selvagem de ALB629 foi utilizado para rastrear a colonização da planta a 20 e 30ºC. ALB629rif foi detectado apenas nas raízes (103,22 UFC g-1) na menor temperatura enquanto que a 30ºC, ALB629rif colonizou as raízes, caules e folhas (105.85, 104.48 e 104.01 UFC g-1), respectivamente. A AACPD foi diferente nas duas temperaturas testadas (p < 0,01). No entanto, a redução da doença obtida pelo tratamento de sementes com ALB629rif foi semelhante de 71% e 75%, respectivamente a 20 e 30ºC (p < 0,01). Uma maior eficiência de utilização de fontes de C e N foi observada na temperatura mais elevada, mas o antagonista igualmente inibiu o crescimento de Cff in vitro em qualquer temperatura. Portanto, a temperatura interfere na colonização da planta pelo patógeno e pelo antagonista, mas a supressão da murcha-de-curtabacterium de modo geral parece ser estabilizado por ALB629.

Palavras-chave: tratamento de sementes, Phaseolus vulgaris, antibiose, temperatura, rizobactéria, BPCP.

Introduction

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important legume in Brazil; the crop is cultivated throughout the year, mainly by small growers, with an estimated 10% utilizing certified seeds (SENA et al., 2008). Although various bean seed-transmitted pathogens exist, the bacterial pathogens are the most difficult to control, particularly if no resistant commercial cultivar is available. Presently, the most serious bean bacterial disease is bacterial wilt, which is caused by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens (Cff) (Hedges) Collins and Jones (VALENTINI et al., 2010). The pathogen was reported for the first time in South Dakota, United States by Heges in 1922 (VENETTE et al., 1995) and rapidly spread worldwide. In Brazil, the disease was first reported in 1997 by Maringoni and Rosa (1997) and, thereafter, became a major problem of common beans in different regions. In spite of its relatively recent discovery in Brazil, the pathogen has already spread throughout most of the bean-producing fields (HERBES et al., 2008), causing high economically important losses.

However, disease control by employing resistant cultivars is not possible because there is no commercially available resistant cultivar to date, though there are some germplasm lines of common bean that have demonstrated different levels of resistance to the yellow and orange variants of Cff (HSIEH et al., 2005; THEODORO et al., 2007). Infected seeds represent an important source of inoculum for bean bacterial wilt (HSIEH et al., 2003), yet no chemical seed treatment is registered (MARTINS et al., 2013; HSIEH et al., 2004). Therefore, other methods, such as biological control, need to be employed as potential tools for the management of bacterial wilt in common bean, particularly if used as a treatment of contaminated seeds. Plant beneficial bacteria (PBB), such as Bacillus subtilis strains, are among the disease control strategies that could potentially be useful to control plant pathogenic bacteria (MEDEIROS et al., 2009). Once an antagonist colonizes the plant tissue, the biological control of pathogens can result from a combination of mechanisms, including the competition for nutrients and space, antibiosis, and induced systemic resistance, and can sometimes result in beneficial effects to the host plant (HARMAN et al., 2010; MEDEIROS et al., 2012). Considering the importance of seeds in the transmission of pathogens and the need to reduce fungicide loads in the environment, seed treatment may provide a practical and cost-effective strategy to reduce such seed-born pathogens as Cff (HUANG et al., 2007; MARTINS et al., 2013). Unfortunately, the efficacy of biological control may be strongly influenced by sudden changes in temperature, and its efficacy may be dependent on the stability of such environmental variables as temperature (ASHRAFUZZAMAN et al., 2009). Indeed, both microorganisms and plants are influenced by temperature changes, and the root exudates that support rhizobacterial growth are more rapidly or slowly released at a higher or lower temperature, respectively, thus impacting the growth of bacteria in the rhizosphere (KATO et al., 2005; NIHORIMBERE et al., 2009).

This work aimed to verify the potential of B. subtilis ALB629 seed treatment to prevent bacterial wilt at 20 and 30ºC and to study the relationship between these temperatures on the ability of ALB629 to colonize bean seedlings, to inhibit pathogen growth and to use different carbon and nitrogen sources, the major components of bean root exudates.

Material and methods

Selection of the B. subtilis ALB629rif mutant

To study the antagonist colonization of bean seedlings, a naturally occurring mutant, ALB629rif, was selected from a B. subtilis strain (ALB629) and comparatively tested for growth and biocontrol capacity with its wild-type counterpart. To generate a mutant that is resistant to rifampicin, increasing amendments of this antibiotic were added to the nutrient agar (NA) medium up to 100 ppm at each bacterial culture, similar to a previously described method (MEDEIROS et al., 2009). Both ALB629 and ALB629rif were preserved in peptone glycerol at -80ºC until use.

Biocontrol of bacterial wilt by B. subtilis wild-type and mutant strains at two temperatures

In this first experiment, B. subtilis ALB629 and its mutant, B. subtilis ALB629rif, were used as biocontrol agents against bacterial wilt at of 20 and 30ºC to ascertain the stability of the biological control activity of the mutant strain.

Artificial seed inoculation

Prior to inoculation, commercially available bean seeds (cv. Pérola) were disinfected by soaking in alcohol (70% ethanol) for 30 s, followed by sodium hypochlorite (0.5% active chloride) for 10 min. and sterile distilled water (SDW).

The Cff strain was isolated from dried infected leaves and cultivated on 523 Kado and Heskett medium in Petri dishes at room temperature (28ºC) for 48 hours. The bacterial cells were then transferred to 523 liquid medium in test tubes and cultivated for 48 hours at room temperature (28°C) with shaking at 150 rpm. A 100 µL aliquot of the bacterial suspension was spread using a Drigalski spatula onto the surface of CNS medium amended with mannitol. The Petri dishes were placed at room temperature (28ºC) for 72 hours. The disinfected seeds were artificially inoculated with Cff by the physiological conditioning technique of Deuner et al. (2011). The seeds were air-dried in a laminar flow cabinet for 8 hours, and fifty seeds/Petri dish were arranged over the Cff growth for 48 hours at room temperature (28ºC), scraped from the medium and immediately treated as detailed below. Non-inoculated controls were incubated in the same medium under the same conditions without the pathogen.

Biological seed treatment to control bacterial wilt at two temperatures

B. subtilis ALB629 and its mutant ALB629rif were cultivated on NA medium in Petri dishes at room temperature (28ºC) for 48 hours. Cells were subsequently transferred to a nutrient stock medium and cultivated for 48 hours at room temperature (28°C) with shaking at 150 rpm. The endospore concentration of the bacterial suspension was adjusted using a Neubauer chamber to 1×108 CFU mL-1 by dilution plating and then used for the seed treatment. The inoculated seeds were individually treated with the B. subtilis wild strain (ALB629) and its mutant (ALB629rif) in a suspension of 108 CFU mL-1, copper oxychloride (2 g a.i. L-1), or water by imersion at the ratio of 2 mL per gram of seed for 30 min. Seeds without Cff inoculation were immersed in water solution as a control. The suspension was rinsed off, and the seeds were sown in 3 L pots filled with Argissoil, with 6 seeds per pot. A portion of the pots were maintained in growth chambers at 20ºC and another portion at 30ºC under a 12 hours photoperiod. The experiment was arranged in randomized block, with four replicates, and the plants were watered to maintain the soil moisture at field capacity.

Assessment of the analyzed variables

The curtobacterium wilt severity was evaluted according to Hsieh et al. (2003) at 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 days after sowing (DAS). A 0 - 5 scale was used, as follows: 0 = no wilt symptoms; 1 = wilt on one of the primary leaves; 2 = wilt on both primary leaves but not on the first trifoliolate leaf; 3 = wilt on the first trifoliolate leaf; 4 = death of the seedling after wilt development on the primary leaves and 5 = unmerged seedling or death of seedling before wilt development on the primary leaves. The data were used to calculate the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) according to Shaner and Finney (1977). The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design. The data were subjected to a variance analysis (ANOVA); for significant effects, the data were compared using Tukey's test (p = 0.05). The experiment was repeated twice.

Colonization of bean seedlings by ALB629rif

In this second experiment, the artificial seed inoculation and the biological seed treatment with ALB629rif were performed, as described previously. To track plant colonization by the biocontrol agent, two plants per pot were randomly sampled at 24 DAS and separated into roots, stems and leaves. The cotyledons were used as the leaf samples, the stem samples consisted of the region between cotyledon insertion and the first true leaf, and the root samples consisted of the entire root system. Each assessed plant tissue was weighed, surface disinfected with alcohol (70%) for 30 s, followed by hypochlorite (0.5% active chloride) for 10 min. and washed twice with SDW. The tissue was then transferred to 10 mL tubes containing 5 mL of SDW; the tissue was crushed, vortexed for 1 min. and serially diluted to 10-5. The crude extract and the 10-1 to 10-5 dilutions were then plated by spreading on NA medium with 100 ppm rifampicin and incubated at room temperature (28ºC). Colonies were counted after 2 days of incubation, and the data were transformed to log10 CFU g-1 of fresh tissue. The experiment was performed in a randomized block design. The data were subjected to an ANOVA; for significant effects, the data were compared using Tukey's test (p = 0.05). The experiment was repeated twice.

Antibiosis in vitro

The stability of the Cff inhibition in vitro was tested at two temperatures: 20 and 30ºC. The bacterial pathogen was cultivated in liquid medium 523 for 48 hours, and 100 µL of the suspension was spread on CNS medium. The antagonist was grown in liquid medium MCF, and a 10 µL aliquot of 108 CFU mL-1 of ALB629 and a 10 µL aliquot of MCF medium was transferred to plates containing the Cff suspension. Five plates were incubated at 20ºC and another five at 30ºC. The zone of inhibition was recorded 24 hours afterwards. The experiment was performed in a factorial scheme using a randomized block design. The data were subjected to an ANOVA, and the significant effects were compared using Tukey's test (p = 0.05). The experiment was repeated twice.

B. subtilis ALB629 growth using different C and N sources

In this experiment, B. subtilis ALB629 was tested for its ability to use different nutritional sources of carbon and nitrogen under at 20 and 30ºC. Thus, ALB629 was grown in four different culture media for 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours to create a growth curve. The different culture media differed from each other by the following substrates: glucose, sodium citrate, aspartate, and glutamate, with the two first two being used as carbon sources and the last two used as nitrogen sources. These four different nutrients were used at 10 g L-1 concentration except for glutamate (15 g L-1). Each of these nutrients was added to another solution composed of 0.5 g L-1 MgSO4 (7H2O), 1.0 g L-1 K2HPO4, 0.5 g L-1 KCl, 1.0 g L-1 yeast extract, 1.2 mg L-1 FeSO4 (7H2O), 0.4 mg L-1 MnSO4 (H2O), 1.6 mg L-1 CuSO4, and 1 g L-1 (NH4)2SO4. The pH of each medium was adjusted to 7 with NaOH or 0.1 N HCl before sterilization, as described previously (NIHORIMBERE et al., 2009).

The experimental plot consisted of a test tube with 3 mL of each of the above 4 culture media, with three replicates per plot x time x temperature. To evaluate ALB629 growth, the strain was cultivated in a nutrient broth composed of 13.8 g L-1 yeast extract, 2.5 g L-K2HPO4, 1.0 g L-1 KH2PO4 (anhydrous), 2.5 g L-1 NaCl, 6.5 g L-1 sucrose, 0.25 g L-1 magnesium sulfate and 0.1 g L-1 manganese sulfate for 48 hours at 28°C under stirring at 150 rpm. Every 12 hours (for 48 hours), a 150 µL aliquot of the antagonist suspension was transferred to each tube containing 3 mL of each previously described medium. The test tubes were placed in two different orbital shakers at different temperatures, 20 and 30ºC, both at 150 rpm. After 48 hours from the first transfer, for each incubation temperature (20 and 30ºC) and each sampled time point (12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after the onset of the experiment), three replicates of one tube each were individually analyzed by measuring the absorbance using a light spectrophotometer DU® 640B at λ = 600 nm. The experiment was performed in a factorial scheme (2 temperatures x 4 sampled time points x 4 nutrient sources) using a randomized block design. The data were subjected to a variance analysis (ANOVA); for significant effects, the temperature and nutrient factors were compared using Tukey's test (p = 0.05) and the sampled time points using a regression analysis. The linear regression equations were subjected to a parallelism (F-test) test to verify the null hypothesis that the slopes of the equations were statistically equal. The goodness of fit of the models was tested at 0.05 significance and evaluated by its coefficient of determination (R²). The data analyses were performed using SISVAR software (FERREIRA, 2011).

Results and discussion

Disease control was achieved by seed treatment with B. sutilis ALB629 at approximately. 70% compared to the water control; both wild-type and mutant ALB629 displayed the same growth rate. Moreover, based on the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), the biological control of the bacterial wilt of bean was not different between the wild-type and mutant strains at 30ºC (p = 0.8596) or 20ºC (p = 0.1572), and both were effective in reducing the common bean bacterial wilt severity progress (AUDPC) at either temperature.

Because the wild-type and mutant strains showed the same disease reduction, all of the subsequent experiments were performed using only the mutant. Although the AUDPC was different between both tested temperatures (p < 0.01), the disease reduction obtained by the ALB629rif seed treatment was similar at 71 and 75%, respectively, for 20 and 30ºC when compared with the non-inoculated untreated seeds (control) (p < 0.01) (Table 1).

Although B. subtilis ALB629rif could efficiently reduce the disease severity at either temperature, it had a direct effect on the overall AUDPC (Table 1). At the higher temperature, a higher AUDPC was observed for all the treatments, and this corroborates previous findings for the influence of temperature on bacterial wilt severity (KRAUSE et al., 2009). Nevertheless, the biocontrol agent ALB629 induced a consistent disease reduction of approximately. 72%, regardless of the temperature. The same temperature-independent trend was not observed for the seeds treated with copper oxychloride (p < 0.001), the putative positive control.

The mutant strain, which showed consistent disease control, was used to monitor plant colonization. The plants were colonized by the bacterium, regardless of the temperature; however, the bacterium colonized the roots (105.85 CFU g-1), stems (104.48 CFU g-1) and leaves (104.01 CFU g-1) at 30ºC, whereas it remained confined to the roots (103.22 CFU g-1) at 20ºC, with a population approx. 100 times smaller. Because the pathogen was not as damaging at the lower temperature, the antagonist was able to control the disease, even at a less robust plant colonization (Figure 1).


ALB629 was confined to the roots when the plants were grown at 20ºC and colonized the entire plant at 30ºC, suggesting that the induced resistance might play a pivotal role as a control mechanism in this plant-pathogen interaction (ONGENA et al., 2007). Future experiments will investigate the activity of key defense-related enzymes in disease control; although it might also be present at the higher temperature, direct antibiosis will still have to be considered as a key mechanism to cope with more aggressive plant colonization under this condition. Another hypothesis that may be drawn to explain the observed disease control at the lower temperature is that because both the pathogen and biocontrol agent were introduced via seeds, both shared the same niche at the early stages of plant development. Thus, an initial direct antibiosis may have occurred, reducing the initial inoculum of the pathogen, and, even when ALB629 was confined to the roots, the possible induced resistance triggered by the biocontrol agent or simply by the low pathogen inoculum would be sufficient to cope with the disease. We are presently investigating each of hypotheses to explain the observed disease control.

The diversity of the root exudate secreted at each temperature may also regulate the rate at which ALB629 was able to grow. Bean roots release large amounts of amino acids and sugars (ODUNFA, 1979), which supply the demands of carbon and nitrogen for rhizosphere microorganisms (YOUSSEF; MANKARIOS, 1968).

Based on the spectrophotometric absorbance reading (λ = 600 nm), a different pattern of ALB629 growth was observed when it was cultivated using different nutrient sources (p < 0.01). Moreover, the bacterial growth at 30ºC was higher than at 20ºC (p < 0.01) (Table 2).

The nutrient sources supported different bacterial growth at each temperature. Glutamate supported the highest growth, which was more than two times higher than the growth observed for aspartate, the nutrient source that supported the second-highest growth. In contrast, sodium citrate supported a comparatively lower growth, but the growth was higher than with glucose. For all of the nutrient sources except aspartate, the growth observed at 30°C was higher than that observed at 20°C.

Moreover, the bacterial growth differed over time (p < 0.01), with the growth increasing (12, 24, 36, and 48 hours) when the times were compared using Tukey's test (Figure 2A, B, C and D).


Except for sodium citrate and aspartate at 30ºC, all of the other substrates differed significantly according to the F-test (p < 0.05) including sodium citrate and aspartate at 20ºC. All the tested amino acids are components of bean root exudates and, compared to other sugars and amino acids, support higher surfactin, a lipopeptide that acts in the induction of resistance, production by Bacillus subtilis (NIHORIMBERE et al., 2009). It remains unknown whether the molecules produced by ALB629 directly or indirectly inhibit the growth of the pathogen. However, with regard to disease control independently of the temperature, the growth using aspartate was similar at either tested temperature, and the bacterial growth displayed a standard characteristic of a probable phase adaptation of twelve hours, a logarithmic phase at 12-24 hours, a stationary phase at 24-36 hours, and a decline phase thereafter. These results suggest that resistance induction plays an important role in the protection of bean against bacterial wilt triggered by ALB629. Future studies will determine the induction of resistance at different temperatures and lipopeptide production under these conditions. Furthermore, induced resistance elicitors may be responsible for the observed biological control because antibiosis at either temperature displayed similar results (p < 0.05).

Therefore, B. subtilis ALB629 controls bacterial wilt in bean via treatment of infected seeds, and the stability of the disease control at different temperatures reinforces the potential practical use of this biological control agent, particularly because bean is cultivated throughout the year at different locations where different temperature conditions are found.

Conclusion

The stability of bacterium wilt control, the root colonization, the use of different nutrient sources and antibiosis at 20 and 30ºC implies ALB629 as a promising tool to be used in the disease management in the field avoiding important bacterial wilt outbreaks that have been frequently observed in Brazil.

Acknowledgements

We thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico Cultural (CNPq), Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Programa de Apoio a Primeiros Projetos (PAPP/UFLA) for providing the financial support necessary for the development of this work. We thank CNPq for providing assistantship for the second and third authors.

References

ASHRAFUZZAMAN, M.; HOSSEN, F. A.; ISMAIL, M. R.; HOQUE, M. D. A.; ISLAM, M. Z.; SHAHIDULLAH, S. M.; MEON, S. Efficiency of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for the enhancement of rice growth. African Journal of Biotechnology, v. 8, n. 7, p. 1247-1252, 2009.

DEUNER, C. C.; SOUZA, R. M.; ISHIDA, A. K. N.; ZACARONI, A. B.; VON PINHO, E. V. R.; MACHADO, J. C.; CAMERA, J. N. Inoculação de Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens em sementes de feijão por meio da técnica de condicionamento fisiológico. Revista Brasileira de Semente, v. 33, n. 2, p. 9-20, 2011.

FERREIRA, D. F. SISVAR: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1039-1042, 2011.

HARMAN, G.; OBREGON, M. A.; SAMUELS, G. J.; LORITTO, M. Changing models for commercialization and implementation of biocontrol in the developing and the developed world. Plant Disease, v. 94, n. 8, p. 928-938, 2010.

HERBES, D. H.; THEODORO, G. F.; MARINGONI, A. C.; DAL PIVA, C. A.; ABREU, L. Detecção de Curtobacterium fl accumfaciens pv. fl accumfaciens em sementes de feijoeiro produzidas em Santa Catarina. Tropical Plant Pathology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 53-156, 2008.

HSIEH, T. F.; HUANG, H. C.; CONNER, R. L. Bacterial wilt of bean: Current status and prospects. Recent Research Developments in Plant Science, v. 2, p. 181-206, 2004.

HSIEH, T. F.; HUANG, H. C.; MÜNDEL, H. H.; ERICKSON, R. S. Arapid indoor technique for screening common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for resistance to bacterial wilt [Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens (Hedges) Collins and Jones]. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, v. 21, n. 3, p. 370-374, 2003.

HSIEH, T. F.; HUANG, H. C.; MÜNDEL, H. H.; CONNER, R. L.; ERICKSON, R. S.; BALASUBRAMANIAN, P. M. Resistance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to bacterial wilt caused by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens. Journal of Phytopathology, v. 153, n. 4, p. 245-249, 2005.

HUANG, H. C.; ERICKSON, R. S.; HSIEH, T. F. Control of bacterial wilt of bean (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens) by seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosarum. Crop Protection, v. 26, n. 7, p. 1055-1061, 2007.

KATO, K.; WATANABE, K.; ARIMA, Y. Rhizobium Proliferation-Supporting Substances in Seed Exudates of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, v. 51, n. 6, p. 905-910, 2005.

KRAUSE, W.; RODRIGUES, R.; GONÇALVES, L. S. A.; BEZERRA NETO, F. V.; LEAL, N. R. Genetic divergence in snap bean based on agronomic traits and resistance to bacterial wilt. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, v. 9, n. 3, p. 246-252, 2009.

MARINGONI, A. C.; ROSA, E. F. Ocorrência de Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens em feijoeiro no Estado de São Paulo. Summa Phytopathologica, v. 23, n. 2, p. 160-162, 1997.

MARTINS, S. J.; MEDEIROS, F. H. V.; SOUZA, R. M.; RESENDE, M. L. V.; RIBEIRO JUNIOR, P. M. Biological control of bacterial wilt of common bean by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biological Control, v. 66, n. 1, p. 65-71, 2013.

MEDEIROS, F. H. V. Management of melon bacterial blotch by plant beneficial bactéria. Phytoparasitica, v. 37, n. 5, p. 453-460, 2009.

MEDEIROS, F. H. V.; MARTINS, S. J.; ZUCCHI, T. D.; DE MELO, I. S.; BATISTA, L. R.; MACHADO, J. C. Biological control of mycotoxin - producing molds. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 36, n. 5, p. 483-497, 2012.

NIHORIMBERE, V.; FICKERS, P.; THONART, P.; THONART, P.; ONGENA, M. Ecological fitness of Bacillus subtilis BGS3 regarding production of the surfactin lipopeptide in the rhizosphere. Environmental Microbiology Reports, v. 1, n. 2, p. 124-130, 2009.

ODUNFA, V. S. A. Free amino acids in the seed and root exudates in relation to the nitrogen requirements of rhizosphere soil Fusaria. Plant and Soil, v. 52, n. 4, p. 491-499, 1979.

ONGENA, M.; ADAM, A.; JOURDAN, E.; PAQUOT, M.; BRANS, A.; JORIS, B.; ARPIGNY, J. L.; THONART, P. Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. Environmental Microbiology, v. 9, n. 4, p. 1084-1090, 2007.

SENA, M. R.; ABREU, A. F. B.; RAMALHO, M. A. P.; BRUZI, A. T. Envolvimentoe de agricultores no processo seletivo de novas linhagens de feijoeiro. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 32, n. 2, p. 407-412, 2008.

SHANER, G.; FINNEY, R. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow mildewing resistance in Knox Wheat. Phytopathology, v. 67, n. 8, p. 1051-1056, 1977.

THEODORO, G. F.; HERBES, D. H.; MARINGONI, A. C. Fontes de resistência à murcha de curtobacterium em cultivares locais de feijoeiro, coletadas em Santa Catarina. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 31, n. 5, p. 333-1339, 2007.

VALENTINI, G.; GUIDOLIN, A. F.; BALDISSERA, J. N. C.; COIMBRA, J. L. M. Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens: etiologia, detecção e medidas de controle. Revista Biotemas, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2010.

VENETTE, J. R.; LAMPRA, R. S.; GROSS, P. L. First report of bean bacterial wilt caused by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens subsp. flaccumfaciens in North Dakota. Plant Disease Note, v. 79, n. 9, p. 966, 1995.

YOUSSEF, Y. A.; MANKARIOS, A. T. Studies on the rhizosphere mycoflora of broad bean and cotton: II., seed and root exudates and their effects on spore germination and growth of the prevalent fungi isolated from the rhizosphere. Mycopathologia, v. 38, n. 3, p. 257-269, 1968.

Received on July 20, 2012

Accepted on October 24, 2012

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • ASHRAFUZZAMAN, M.; HOSSEN, F. A.; ISMAIL, M. R.; HOQUE, M. D. A.; ISLAM, M. Z.; SHAHIDULLAH, S. M.; MEON, S. Efficiency of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for the enhancement of rice growth. African Journal of Biotechnology, v. 8, n. 7, p. 1247-1252, 2009.
  • DEUNER, C. C.; SOUZA, R. M.; ISHIDA, A. K. N.; ZACARONI, A. B.; VON PINHO, E. V. R.; MACHADO, J. C.; CAMERA, J. N. Inoculação de Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens em sementes de feijão por meio da técnica de condicionamento fisiológico. Revista Brasileira de Semente, v. 33, n. 2, p. 9-20, 2011.
  • FERREIRA, D. F. SISVAR: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1039-1042, 2011.
  • HARMAN, G.; OBREGON, M. A.; SAMUELS, G. J.; LORITTO, M. Changing models for commercialization and implementation of biocontrol in the developing and the developed world. Plant Disease, v. 94, n. 8, p. 928-938, 2010.
  • HERBES, D. H.; THEODORO, G. F.; MARINGONI, A. C.; DAL PIVA, C. A.; ABREU, L. Detecção de Curtobacterium fl accumfaciens pv. fl accumfaciens em sementes de feijoeiro produzidas em Santa Catarina. Tropical Plant Pathology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 53-156, 2008.
  • HSIEH, T. F.; HUANG, H. C.; CONNER, R. L. Bacterial wilt of bean: Current status and prospects. Recent Research Developments in Plant Science, v. 2, p. 181-206, 2004.
  • HSIEH, T. F.; HUANG, H. C.; MÜNDEL, H. H.; ERICKSON, R. S. Arapid indoor technique for screening common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for resistance to bacterial wilt [Curtobacterium ďŹaccumfaciens pv. ďŹaccumfaciens (Hedges) Collins and Jones]. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, v. 21, n. 3, p. 370-374, 2003.
  • HSIEH, T. F.; HUANG, H. C.; MÜNDEL, H. H.; CONNER, R. L.; ERICKSON, R. S.; BALASUBRAMANIAN, P. M. Resistance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to bacterial wilt caused by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens Journal of Phytopathology, v. 153, n. 4, p. 245-249, 2005.
  • HUANG, H. C.; ERICKSON, R. S.; HSIEH, T. F. Control of bacterial wilt of bean (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens) by seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosarum. Crop Protection, v. 26, n. 7, p. 1055-1061, 2007.
  • KATO, K.; WATANABE, K.; ARIMA, Y. Rhizobium Proliferation-Supporting Substances in Seed Exudates of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, v. 51, n. 6, p. 905-910, 2005.
  • KRAUSE, W.; RODRIGUES, R.; GONÇALVES, L. S. A.; BEZERRA NETO, F. V.; LEAL, N. R. Genetic divergence in snap bean based on agronomic traits and resistance to bacterial wilt. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, v. 9, n. 3, p. 246-252, 2009.
  • MARINGONI, A. C.; ROSA, E. F. Ocorrência de Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens em feijoeiro no Estado de São Paulo. Summa Phytopathologica, v. 23, n. 2, p. 160-162, 1997.
  • MARTINS, S. J.; MEDEIROS, F. H. V.; SOUZA, R. M.; RESENDE, M. L. V.; RIBEIRO JUNIOR, P. M. Biological control of bacterial wilt of common bean by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biological Control, v. 66, n. 1, p. 65-71, 2013.
  • MEDEIROS, F. H. V. Management of melon bacterial blotch by plant beneficial bactéria. Phytoparasitica, v. 37, n. 5, p. 453-460, 2009.
  • MEDEIROS, F. H. V.; MARTINS, S. J.; ZUCCHI, T. D.; DE MELO, I. S.; BATISTA, L. R.; MACHADO, J. C. Biological control of mycotoxin - producing molds. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 36, n. 5, p. 483-497, 2012.
  • NIHORIMBERE, V.; FICKERS, P.; THONART, P.; THONART, P.; ONGENA, M. Ecological fitness of Bacillus subtilis BGS3 regarding production of the surfactin lipopeptide in the rhizosphere. Environmental Microbiology Reports, v. 1, n. 2, p. 124-130, 2009.
  • ODUNFA, V. S. A. Free amino acids in the seed and root exudates in relation to the nitrogen requirements of rhizosphere soil Fusaria. Plant and Soil, v. 52, n. 4, p. 491-499, 1979.
  • ONGENA, M.; ADAM, A.; JOURDAN, E.; PAQUOT, M.; BRANS, A.; JORIS, B.; ARPIGNY, J. L.; THONART, P. Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. Environmental Microbiology, v. 9, n. 4, p. 1084-1090, 2007.
  • SENA, M. R.; ABREU, A. F. B.; RAMALHO, M. A. P.; BRUZI, A. T. Envolvimentoe de agricultores no processo seletivo de novas linhagens de feijoeiro. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 32, n. 2, p. 407-412, 2008.
  • SHANER, G.; FINNEY, R. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow mildewing resistance in Knox Wheat. Phytopathology, v. 67, n. 8, p. 1051-1056, 1977.
  • THEODORO, G. F.; HERBES, D. H.; MARINGONI, A. C. Fontes de resistência à murcha de curtobacterium em cultivares locais de feijoeiro, coletadas em Santa Catarina. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 31, n. 5, p. 333-1339, 2007.
  • VALENTINI, G.; GUIDOLIN, A. F.; BALDISSERA, J. N. C.; COIMBRA, J. L. M. Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens: etiologia, detecção e medidas de controle. Revista Biotemas, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2010.
  • VENETTE, J. R.; LAMPRA, R. S.; GROSS, P. L. First report of bean bacterial wilt caused by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens subsp. flaccumfaciens in North Dakota. Plant Disease Note, v. 79, n. 9, p. 966, 1995.
  • YOUSSEF, Y. A.; MANKARIOS, A. T. Studies on the rhizosphere mycoflora of broad bean and cotton: II., seed and root exudates and their effects on spore germination and growth of the prevalent fungi isolated from the rhizosphere. Mycopathologia, v. 38, n. 3, p. 257-269, 1968.
  • *
    Author for correspondence. E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      07 Oct 2014
    • Date of issue
      Dec 2014

    History

    • Accepted
      24 Oct 2012
    • Received
      20 July 2012
    Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM Av. Colombo, 5790, bloco 40, 87020-900 - Maringá PR/ Brasil, Tel.: (55 44) 3011-4253, Fax: (55 44) 3011-1392 - Maringá - PR - Brazil
    E-mail: actaagron@uem.br