SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 issue1Self-perception of oral health among schoolchildren in a city of Amazonas, Brazil: related factorsManagement techniques of ameloblastoma: a literature review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia

Print version ISSN 1981-8637On-line version ISSN 1981-8637

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol. vol.65 no.1 Campinas Jan./Mar. 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720170001000083221 

ORIGINAL

Longitudinal study into the determining factors of dental caries in children aged 4: socio-behavioral aspects and oral health of pregnant women

Estudo longitudinal sobre determinantes da cárie aos 4 anos de idade: aspectos sócio-comportamentais e saúde bucal da gestante

Najara Barbosa ROCHA1 

Cléa Adas Saliba GARBIN1 

Artênio José Isper GARBIN1 

Orlando SALIBA1 

Suzely Adas Saliba MOIMAZ1 

1 Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Odontologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Odontologia Preventiva e Social. Araçatuba, SP, Brasil.

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To analyze the influence of oral health conditions and socio-behavioral characteristics of pregnant women on the development of caries and their children's experiences, after 4 years of follow-up.

Methods:

It was conducted a longitudinal study of mother/child pairs by interview and oral clinical examination during pregnancy. Regular observations were made until the child had reached four years of age, at which time we performed a clinical examination of the children (n=73). The variables studied were: presence of caries in pregnancy (DMFT) and the child (deft), visit to the dentist, oral hygiene habits, diet, socioeconomic and behavioral factors, and were related to two study outcomes: presence of caries during the examination and experience of caries (deft≥1) in children of 4 years of age. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted with the variables (p<0.05 and 95% CI).

Results:

The average DMFT index of mothers during pregnancy was 12.09 (±2.88) and average deft index of children at 4 years was 1.79 (± 6.1). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the presence of caries in children was associated with the presence of harmful habits (p=0.04). Caries in the child was statistically associated with brush sharing among family members (p=0.02).

Conclusion:

The results suggest that behavioral aspects are related to the presence and experience of caries in childhood.

Indexing terms: Dental caries; Longitudinal studies; Oral health; Risk factors; Socioeconomic factors.

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Analisar a influência das condições de saúde bucal e das características sócio-comportamentais de gestantes no desenvolvimento e na experiência de cárie em seus filhos, após 4 anos de acompanhamento.

Métodos:

Foi realizado um estudo longitudinal com pares de mães e filhos, mediante entrevista e exame clínico bucal na gestação. Observações periódicas foram realizadas até os quatro anos completos de idade da criança, momento em que foi realizado o exame clínico na criança (n=73). As variáveis estudadas foram: presença de cárie na gestante (CPOD) e na criança (ceod), visita ao cirurgião-dentista, hábitos de higiene bucal, dieta, fatores socioeconômicos e comportamentais, sendo relacionadas com dois desfechos do estudo: presença de cárie no momento do exame e experiência de cárie (ceod≥1) em crianças aos 4 anos de idade. Foram conduzidas análises bivariadas e multivariada com auxílio do Programa Bioestat (p<0,05 e IC 95%).

Resultados:

O CPOD médio das mães durante a gestação foi 12,09 (±2,88) e ceod médio das crianças aos 4 anos foi 1,79 (±6,1). Na análise de regressão logística múltipla, a presença de cárie nos filhos esteve associada com a presença de hábitos deletérios (p=0,04). A experiência de cárie no filho foi associada estatisticamente com o compartilhamento de escova entre os membros da família (p=0.02).

Conclusão:

Os resultados sugerem que aspectos comportamentais estão relacionados à presença e experiência de cárie na infância.

Termos de indexação: Cárie dentária; Estudos longitudinais; Saúde bucal; Fatores de risco; Fatores socioeconômicos.

INTRODUCTION

Dental caries remains a serious problem for public oral health in the majority of industrialized and developing countries1. In Brazil, the most recent national data on dental caries, in 2010, showed that at five years of age only 46.6% of Brazilian children were free from caries in the deciduous dentition and at 12, a mere 43.5% in the permanent dentition2. These values show that, even with advances in the understanding of the etiology and nature of the disease, caries is still regarded as one of the most prevalent oral afflictions in infancy.

Caries should not be treated as simply a disease affecting oral health but as a social and behavioral condition, in view of its complex etiology3. Early childhood caries is so called when it involves at least one decayed, extracted or filled tooth (def≥1) in children less than 71 months old4.

Conceptual models have been described in order to understand the premature development of dental caries in children5. One of these models explains that the disease's predisposing factors may be linked to the child, family and community. As far as child factors are concerned, besides the genetic and biological aspects, we would highlight access to dental care, development, physical attitudes, demographics and behavior, as well as health practices. Family influences are based on socioeconomic and demographic conditions, parents' oral health, culture, health-related practices, behaviors and abilities, physical safety and family function. Turning to the community, the factors are broader, including social assistance, the characteristics of access to dental and health services, culture, social and physical environment and the oral health environment in the community5.

Although early childhood caries is recognized as being multifactorial, further clarification is needed on the interaction of the risk factors and the reason for some children suffering from the disease more than others. Influences in the early years of life may have a significant effect on the health of the deciduous and permanent dentitions6.

Early identification of key factors in oral health makes it possible to carry out primary care in pregnancy and in early infancy, with the aim of preventing diseases that harm children's development from taking root3,7-9.

The mother's lifestyle, including habits such as sugar intake between meals, cariogenic diet during pregnancy and oral hygiene can all have an influence on the experience of caries in their children. This occurs because these undesirable habits can continue during early childhood and be harmful to the child since the parents, mainly the mothers, are responsible for their oral care.

With regard to the development of caries, some factors are known and have been well studied, such as: mother's level of schooling, family income, marital status, mother's age at time of birth, however our understanding of the influence of the child's birth weight, the mother's gestational age, place of residence, lifestyle and behavior is still limited7-10. There have been few studies8,10-11 into factors related to caries in children below the age of four and the majority6-7,12-16 are designed to study the etiology of this affliction in older, pre-school children, for example. Most of the studies3,9,12-13,15-17 analyzing caries in children and their oral health condition, as well as the behavioral condition of the mother, were conducted using a cross-sectional design. Thus, the aim of this longitudinal study was to analyze the influence of oral health conditions and socio-behavioral characteristics of pregnant women on the development and experience of caries in their children, after 4 years of follow-up.

METHODS

This is a prospective, longitudinal study that began in 2007 with the monitoring of pregnant women in the public services of a city in the northwest of the Brazilian state of São Paulo18.

Study population

The sample was composed of pregnant women (and their children after they were born), who were included in a government program to monitor the prenatal period, amounting to 120 pairs in total. In order to calculate the sample size of the finite population, the prevalence of caries in deciduous teeth was taken into consideration, 35% according to the literature9, adopting a level of significance of 5%, an absolute sampling error of 6.4% and a finite population during the period of study (March to July 2007). Those pregnant women who agreed to take part in the study by signing an informed consent form and who were in the last trimester of pregnancy and who did not have multiple births, were included in the study.

Some subjects fell by the wayside during the 4-year follow-up as they did not wish to proceed with the study (n=13) while some could not be located at the address recorded during the initial interview (n=34). These losses are common in this type of study19, so the final sample used was 73 mother/son pairs for the 4-year follow-up.

During pregnancy, the women were interviewed and examined to evaluate dental caries and periodontal disease. The children were monitored from birth by means of home visits on a periodic basis: every month up to 6 months of age, then at 12, 18, 24 and 48 months. At four years of age, they were given an oral examination and the mothers were interviewed once again.

Outcome

Two outcomes were analyzed for the study variables in order to ascertain the factors that influence the development of caries: 1) The presence or otherwise of caries in the deciduous teeth of the children studied (decayed component of the deft index) and 2) experience of early childhood caries, i.e. when it involves at least one decayed, extracted or filled tooth (deft≥1) in children under 71 months of age4.

Clinical examination

A pilot study (n=15) was carried out using a population similar to that of the main study, for the calibration of the researchers, to adjust the data collection instruments and a clinical examination of both mother and child, with a team comprising one interviewer and one note taker. The Kappa test value for intra-rater agreement was 0.91.

Data collection

The forms used in the interviews included information about the mother's oral health, maternal habits, oral hygiene practices, daily routine, socioeconomic and demographic conditions and access to dental services. The indices used for the collection of the clinical data of the pregnant women and children followed the criteria advocated by the WHO20, using a flat mirror and a CPI probe for epidemiological evaluations, under natural light, with both examiner and patient seated.

After 4 years of follow-up, a home visit was made and the oral health of the child was recorded (deft)20, and an interview with the mothers was conducted to ascertain the habits, oral hygiene standards, behavior and characteristics of the children. The children's clinical examinations included a visual check for the presence of active white spots on the deciduous teeth, using the Visible Plaque Index, where 0 signifies the absence of visible bacterial plaque and 1 the presence of visible bacterial plaque in at least one deciduous tooth21.

Studied variables

Oral hygiene was classified as complete when toothpaste, toothbrush and dental floss were used on a daily basis. Smoking and drinking habits during pregnancy (yes/no) were noted, questioning the pregnant woman about the use of cigarettes or alcohol one or more times per week. Income was categorized as follows: mothers receiving up to 2 minimum wages or receiving 2 minimum wages or more (minimum wage being R$ 724). Depending on the mother's age when the child was born, they were classified as: mothers aged up to 22 and those 22 years of age or older. This classification was adopted by considering mothers aged 21 and under as young mothers. As far as marital status is concerned, they were asked if they lived with their partner or not. As for level of schooling, the classification was as follows: up to 8 years of study (elementary education) and 8 years or more of study. A check was made to see if the mother had any systemic illness during pregnancy. With regard to eating habits, it was ascertained if the pregnant mother ate sweet foods or liquids between meals. Birth weight was divided into two groups: children under and over 2.5 Kg. Children were regarded as premature when born at less than 37 weeks gestation. The children's eating habits were recorded with regard to the consumption of sweet foods between meals, the intake of any liquids (milk, tea, juice, among others) with sugar in the feeding bottle and/or any liquid with sugar in the bottle at nighttime.

Statistical analysis

At the conclusion of the interviews, the questionnaires and clinical records were reviewed by the team and subsequently input to the analytical programs. The data were processed using the Epi Info 2000 software program22 analyzed using the Biostat program23, version 5.3.

The statistical analysis included a descriptive and inferential analysis at a level of significance of p≤0.05 and confidence interval (CI) of 95%.

Multivariate analyses were conducted using Multiple Logistic Regression, with two models being adjusted for the outcome variables (decayed component present in the deft index and experience of caries) versus the study variables, which exhibited a value of p≤0.20 in the bivariate analysis23. Results were presented using frequencies and Relative Risk (RR), with a CI of 95%.

Ethical principles

Ethical aspects for conducting research on human beings and the Helsinki Declaration were observed as well as having the approval of the Human Research Committee at the Araçatuba Faculty of Dentistry (UNESP), case no. 2202/2011, and all the mothers signed a free and informed consent agreement.

RESULTS

The average age of the mothers at the time their child was born was 29.9 (± 5.7) years. The majority lived with their partner (78.1%), had completed less than 8 years of schooling (89.0%), had more than one child (60.3%) and a family income of less than 2 minimum wages (89.0%). Most of the mothers (74.0%) did not suffer from any systemic illness and consumed sugar in their diets during pregnancy (68.5%). A total of 43 children (58.9%) were female, 62 (84.9%) weighed more than 2.5 Kg at birth and 58 (79.4%) were born after 37 weeks gestation. The majority of children had sugar in their feeding bottles (58.9%), food containing sugar between meals (87.7%) and nighttime bottles with sweet liquids (56.2%). Only 10 children (13.7%) had seen a dentist, though the majority (65.8%) of mothers did clean their children's teeth at least once a day using a comforter, gauze or brush.

The average DMFT for the mothers was 12.09 (± 6.10), the filled element being the most prevalent in pregnant women (58.2%). The average deft in children was 1.79 (±2.88), the decayed element being the most prevalent (81.5%) (table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of the caries index (DMFT and dmft) components of the mother and child, according to the mean of each component and its total. Araçatuba (SP), 2013. 

DMFT Mean SD Median %
Decayed 2.57 ±2.98 2.00 21.2
Missing 2.49 ±3.80 1.00 20.6
Filled 7.03 ±5.46 7.50 58.2
Total 12.09 ±6.10 12.00 100.0
dmft Mean SD Median %
Decayed 1.46 ±2.70 0.00 81.6
Missing 0.03 ±0.23 0.00 1.7
Filled 0.30 ±0.87 0.00 16.7
Total 1.79 ±2.88 0.00 100.0

The presence of caries in the mother was not linked to the presence of caries in the child, nor the experience of early childhood caries, as shown in tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Numerical and percentual mother´s distribution, according to presence of dental caries in the children and variables, Araçatuba (SP), 2013. 

Variables Presence of caries n (%) No caries n (%) p RR CI (95%)
Mother's age (years) ≥ 22 38 (52.1) 15 (20.5) 0.78 1.36 0.45 - 4.08
< 22 13 (17.8) 7 (9.6)
Marital status Yes 13 (17.8) 3 (4.1) 0.41 2.16 0.55 - 8.53
No 38 (52.1) 19 (26.0)
Employed No 28 (38.4) 13 (17.8) 0.94 0.84 0.30 - 2.32
Yes 23 (31.5) 9 (12.3)
Years of Schooling ≥ 8 7 (9.6) 1 (1.3) 0.45 3.34 0.38 - 28.93
< 8 44 (60.3) 21 (28.8)
Household income (minimum wages) ≥ 2 8 (11.0) 0 (0.0) 0.05
< 2 43 (58.9) 22 (30.1)
Primigest mother No 30 (41.1) 14 (19.2) 0.90 0.81 0.29 - 2.29
Yes 21 (28.7) 8 (11.0)
Smoking during pregnancy No 47 (64.4) 17 (23.3) 0.16 3.45 0.83 - 14.39
Yes 4 (5.5) 5 (6.8)
Drinking habits during pregnancy No 45 (61.7) 16 (21.9) 0.19 2.81 0.79 - 9.98
Yes 6 (8.2) 6 (8.2)
Systemic illness during pregnancy No 37 (50.7) 17 (23.3) 0.89 0.77 0.24 - 2.50
Yes 14 (19.2) 5 (6.8)
Consumed sugar in their diets during pregnancy No 17 (23.3) 6 (8.2) 0.81 1.33 0.44 - 4.02
Yes 34 (46.6) 16 (21.9)
Planned pregnancy Yes 18 (24.6) 8 (11.0) 0.85 0.95 0.33 - 2.70
No 33 (45.2) 14 (19.2)
Complete oral hygiene Yes 26 (35.7) 6 (8.2) 0.10 2.77 0.93 - 8.22
No 25 (34.2) 16 (21.9)
The mother went to the dentist Yes 14 (19.2) 8 (11.0) 0.63 0.66 0.22 - 1.91
No 37 (50.6) 14 (19.2)
Presence of caries in the mother No 16 (21.9) 4 (5.5) 0.38 2.05 0.59 - 7.06
Yes 35 (47.9) 18 (24.7)
Mother's lost teeth No 19 (26.0) 7 (9.6) 0.85 1.27 0.44 - 3.67
Yes 32 (43.9) 15 (20.5)
DMFT ≤6 8 (11.0) 4 (5.5) 0.93 0.83 0.22 - 3.13
>6 43 (58.9) 18 (24.6)
Oral Health Education Yes 11 (15.1) 1 (1.4) 0.14 5.77 0.69 - 47.83
No 40 (54.7) 21 (28.8)
Birth weight (Kg) ≥2.5 43 (58.9) 19 (26.0) 0.89 0.84 0.20 - 3.55
<2.5 8 (11.0) 3 (4.1)
Gestational age (weeks) ≥37 42 (57.6) 16 (21.9) 0.53 1.75 0.53 - 5.71
<37 9 (12.3) 6 (8.2)
Child's Gender Female 28 (38.4) 15 (20.5) 0.42 0.56 0.19 - 1.62
Male 23 (31.5) 7 (9.6)
The mother shares the cutlery with the child No 19 (26.0) 8 (11.0) 1.03 0.84 0.36 - 2.93
Yes 32 (43.8) 14 (19.2)
The sharing of toothbrushes by family members No 39 (53.4) 20 (27.4) 0.26 0.32 0.06 - 1.59
Yes 12 (16.4) 2 (2.8)
Child's access to the dentist Yes 8 (11.0) 2 (2.7) 0.70 1.86 0.36 - 9.57
No 43 (58.9) 20 (27.4)
Oral hygiene of the child Yes 33 (45.2) 15 (20.5) 0.98 0.85 0.29 - 2.48
No 18 (24.7) 7 (9.6)
Presence of active white spots on the deciduous teeth No 28 (38.4) 10 (13.7) 0.62 1.46 0.53 - 3.98
Yes 23 (31.5) 12 (16.4)
Food containing sugar between meals No 8 (11.0) 1 (1.3) 0.35 3.90 0.45 - 33.32
Yes 43 (58.9) 21 (28.8)
Sugar in feeding bottles No 21 (28.7) 9 (12.4) 0.81 1.01 0.36 - 2.79
Yes 30 (41.1) 13 (17.8)
Nighttime bottles with sweet liquids No 21 (28.7) 11 (15.1) 0.65 0.7 0.25 - 2.50
Yes 30 (41.1) 11 (15.1)
Presence of harmful habits No 22 (30.1) 17 (23.3) 0.01 0.22 0.07 - 0.69
Yes 29 (39.8) 5 (6.8)
Breastfeeding (months) ≤ 6 26 (35.6) 4 (5.5)
6 < 12 10 (13.7) 4 (5.5) 0.01
≥ 12 15 (20.5) 14 (19.2)

Table 3 Numerical and percentual distribution of mothers, according to experience of early childhood caries (dmft≥1) in the children and variables, Araçatuba (SP), 2013. 

Variables dmft = 0 n (%) dmft ≥1 n (%) p RR CI (95%)
Mother's age (years) ≥ 22 30 (41.1) 23 (31.5)) 0.53 1.59 0.56 - 4.48
< 22 9 (12.3) 11 (15.1
Marital status Yes 9 (12.3) 7 (9.6) 0.97 1.15 0.37 - 3.53
No 30 (41.1) 27 (37.0)
Employed No 22 (30.1) 19 (26.0) 0.84 1.02 0.40 - 2.58
Yes 17 (23.3) 15 (20.6)
Years of Schooling ≥ 8 4 (5.5) 4 (5.5) 0.86 0.85 0.19 - 3.72
< 8 35 (47.9) 30 (41.1)
Household income (minimum wages) ≥ 2 35 (47.9) 30 (41.1) 0.86 1.17 0.27 - 5.07
< 2 4 (5.5) 4 (5.5)
Primigest mother No 23 (31.5) 21 (28.8) 0.99 0.88 0.34 - 2.28
Yes 16 (21.9) 13 (17.8)
Smoking during pregnancy No 36 (49.3) 28 (38.4) 0.35 2.57 0.59 - 11.19
Yes 3 (4.1) 6 (8.2)
Drinking habits during pregnancy No 34 (46.6) 27 (37.0) 0.56 1.76 0.50 - 6.18
Yes 5 (6.8) 7 (9.6)
Systemic illness during pregnancy No 27 (37.0) 27 (37.0) 0.47 0.58 0.19 - 1.70
Yes 12 (16.4) 7 (9.6)
Consumed sugar in their diets during pregnancy No 11 (15.1) 12 (16.4) 0.69 0.72 0.26 - 1.93
Yes 28 (38.4) 22 (30.1)
Planned pregnancy Yes 12 (16.4) 14 (19.2) 0.49 0.63 0.24 - 1.66
No 27 (37.0) 20 (27.4)
Complete oral hygiene Yes 21 (28.8) 11 (15.1) 0.10 2.43 0.93 - 6.34
No 18 (24.6 23 (31.5)
The mother went to the dentist Yes 10 (13.8) 12 (16.4) 0.52 0.63 0.23 - 1.72
No 29 (39.7) 22 (30.1)
Presence of caries in the mother No 12 (16.4) 8 (11.0) 0.67 1.44 0.50 - 4.10
Yes 27 (37.0) 26 (35.6)
Mother's lost teeth No 14 (19.2) 12 (16.4) 0.84 1.02 0.39 - 2.68
Yes 25 (34.3) 22 (30.1)
DMFT ≤6 5 (6.8) 7 (9.6) 0.56 0.56 0.16 - 1.99
>6 34 (46.6) 27 (37.0)
Oral Health Education Yes 30 (41.1) 31 (42.5) 0.18 0.32 0.07 - 1.31
No 9 (12.3) 3 (4.1)
Birth weight (Kg) ≥2.5 31 (42.5) 31 (42.5) 0.28 0.37 0.09 - 1.54
<2.5 8 (11.0) 3 (4.0)
Gestational age (weeks) ≥37 33 (45.2) 25 (34.2) 0.37 1.98 0.62 - 6.29
<37 6 (8.2) 9 (12.4)
Child's Gender Female 23 (31.5) 20 (27.4) 0.82 1.00 0.39 - 2.56
Male 16 (21.9) 14 (19.2)
The mother shares the cutlery with the child No 13 (17.8) 14 (19.2) 0.65 0.71 0.27 - 1.85
Yes 26 (35.5) 20 (27.4)
The sharing of toothbrushes by family members No 27 (37.0) 32 (43.9) 0.01 0.14 0.02 - 0.68
Yes 12 (16.4) 2 (2.7)
Child's access to the dentist Yes 6 (8.2) 4 (5.5) 0.91 1.36 0.35 - 5.30
No 33 (45.2) 30 (41.1)
Oral hygiene of the child Yes 28 (38.3) 20 (27.4) 0.35 1.78 0.67 - 4.72
No 11 (15.1) 14 (19.2)
Presence of active white spots on the deciduous teeth No 24 (32.9) 14 (19.2) 0.13 2.28 0.89 - 5.84
Yes 15 (20.5) 20 (27.4)
Food containing sugar between meals No 3 (4.1) 6 (8.2) 0.35 0.39 0.08 - 1.69
Yes 36 (49.3) 28 (38.4)
Sugar in feeding bottles No 16 (21.9) 14 (19.2) 0.82 0.99 0.39 - 2.53
Yes 23 (31.5) 20 (27.4)
Nighttime bottles with sweet liquids No 17 (23.3) 15 (20.6) 0.84 0.98 0.38 - 2.47
Yes 22 (30.1) 19 (26.0)
Presence of harmful habits No 18 (24.6) 21 (28.8) 0.27 0.53 0.20 - 1.35
Yes 21 (28.8) 13 (17.8)
Breastfeeding (months) ≤ 6 18 (24.7) 12 (16.4) 0.48
6 < 12 8 (11.0) 6 (8.2)
≥ 12 13 (17.8) 16 (21.9)

Tables 2 and 3 show the results of the bivariate analysis of the behavioral, social, economic and demographic aspects and the mother and child's oral health linked to the presence of caries and early childhood caries (deft≥1). The presence of harmful habits, i.e. sucking pacifiers or thumbs (0.01), the duration of breastfeeding (p=0.01) and family income (p=0.05) were linked to the presence of caries in the child. The sharing of toothbrushes by family members was linked to the experience of early childhood caries (p=0.01).

The Multiple Logistic Regression information is shown in table 4. In terms of the link to the presence of childhood caries, this analysis included the following variables: oral health education, mother's hygiene, family income, mothers who smoke, ingestion of alcoholic beverages, presence of habits and duration of breastfeeding. As regards the association with the experience of early childhood caries (deft≥1) the following were included: presence of white spots on the teeth, complete oral hygiene of the mother and shared toothbrushes.

Table 4 Multiple logistical regression analysis between variables with p≤ 0.20 to presence of dental caries and experience of early childhood caries (dmtf≥1) in the children. Araçatuba (SP), 2013. 

Variables p Coef. Standard error RR CI (95%)
presence of dental caries
Oral Health Education 0.18 -1.51 1.14 0.22 0.02 - 2.07
Complete oral hygiene 0.28 -0.72 0.68 0.48 0.13 - 1.84
Smoking during pregnancy 0.31 0.97 0.98 2.64 0.39 - 17.96
Drinking habits during pregnancy 0.50 0.60 0.89 1.82 0.31 - 10.59
Absence of harmful habits 0.04 -1.32 0.66 0.26 0.07 - 0.98
Longer breastfeeding time 0.14 0.03 0.02 1.03 0.99 - 1.09
Variables dmtf≥1
Complete oral hygiene 0.31 -0.55 0.55 0.57 0.19 - 1.70
Presence of active white spots on the deciduous teeth 0.25 0.63 0.54 1.89 0.65 - 5.54
No sharing of toothbrushes by family members 0.02 -1.92 0.82 0.15 0.03 - 0.73

DISCUSSION

In this longitudinal study with a follow-up of the mother/child pairing, from gestation to the child's fourth birthday, it was found that the presence of dental caries in children was associated with the presence of deleterious habits (pacifier or thumb sucking). The experience of early childhood caries (deft≥1) was associated with the sharing of toothbrushes by family members.

The advantages of longitudinal studies with repeated data collection during pregnancy and infancy include the reduced bias risk resulting in the ability of the parents to faithfully record the events7. Few longitudinal studies have been conducted in a very young population, i.e. early infancy8, as is the case of this study.

Parents' attitudes and perceptions have been investigated in the prevention of early childhood caries12. The health and welfare of children and youngsters is dependent on the practices and beliefs of the main carer, thus various psychosocial and behavioral factors of early childhood caries differ from the factors for dental caries in older children13.

The mother is deemed to be the person mainly responsible for the health of the family, principally in terms of the provision of care for their children24. As well as being able to transmit bacteria that cause caries in their children8, she also installs habits, models, values and attitudes6. Therefore, early maternal intervention can reduce the probability of early childhood caries6 and should already be prioritized in the health services in the prenatal period7. However there are some mothers who are not interested in finding out what is best for their children's health10, necessitating greater motivation and guidance during this period.

In this study, the mothers' level of schooling was not associated with the presence of childhood caries, but this may be explained by the fact that the sample is very homogeneous (having similar social characteristics), i.e. the pregnant women who frequented public health services had, for the most part, a low level of schooling and low income. This finding was also noted in a separate study conducted with mothers of schoolchildren in an oral health program with homogeneous characteristics in the study population25 and it can be seen that the results differ when the study involves a heterogeneous population14.

Oral cleansing practices are heavily influenced by family circumstances, which determine the formation of either positive or harmful habits, as far as oral health is concerned. The results did not show a significant relationship between the mother's and child's oral hygiene. One hypothesis for this was the method employed to collect the data: the interview. People tend to respond what they believe to be ideal or appropriate, often omitting what really takes place, mainly with regard to oral hygiene, in order to avoid being judged by others26.

Parents or guardians still attribute little value to the importance of the deciduous dentition15. In this study, a large number of children had caries and only 10 had been seen by a dental surgeon by the age of 4, alarming data as the first dental examination is recommended at the time of the eruption of the first tooth, and no later than 12 months of age4.

The duration of breastfeeding was linked to the presence of caries (p=0.01) in the bivariate analysis, similar to the findings of another study27, however in the multiple logistic regression (p=0.14) this association was not substantiated. Feeding patterns in infancy, such as prolonged breastfeeding, are responsible for an increase in the exposure of deciduous teeth to fermentable carbohydrates, and may promote the early colonization of microorganisms that cause the disease, promoting the development of caries, however a recent study did not support this association17. It is important to stress that dental caries is a multifactorial disease, thus one variable by itself is not responsible for the cause of the disease. Moreover, if the correct cleaning of the children's teeth occurs on a daily basis, eliminating bacterial plaque, there is no possibility of caries disease developing. Breastfeeding until the child is two or more years old is recommended on account of the advantages that it brings to the general and oral health of the child17-18, therefore it is not necessary to recommend the discontinuance of this form of feeding but rather to prioritize the mothers that breastfeed for a prolonged period for inclusion in the caries disease prevention groups, instructing them on how to care for their child's oral health.

The establishment of deleterious habits, such as sucking pacifiers or thumbs, was found to have significant association with the presence of caries in children in the study, both for the bivariate analysis (p=0.01) and the logistic regression (p=0.04), a fact which may be explained by the transmissibility of microorganisms present in these implements, besides the fact that the mother often places sweet substances on the pacifier for the child to calm down, suggesting a risk factor for dental caries11.

The brushing of the teeth is the oral hygiene measure most commonly used in the various populations, however it can be responsible for the transmission of infectious and parasitic diseases, mainly caries bacteria, if the toothbrush is shared by several people28. In this study, one important finding suggests that the non-sharing of brushes was associated with the prevention of early childhood caries (p=0.02; OR=0.15). This shows that parents need to be educated about this habit, one which seems innocuous but is practiced a lot by carers, and it can lead to damage to their children's oral health.

The establishment of caries disease requires that social and cultural factors related to the primary biological, genetic and hygiene factors be in evidence. When analyzing the individual risk of caries in a child, it is necessary to evaluate the data related to his/her social interaction and environment16,22,26. It is important to include the mother's data in the child's treatment as she is the reference for the child in matters of health. Data such as mother's age at the time she gave birth to the child, her level of education, marital status, number of children, access to services, place where she lives, habits and maternal lifestyle, amongst others, need to be collected and evaluated29, as they could interfere with the child's oral condition30. It is a question of transmissibility, understood not only in the microbiological context but also, and more importantly, in the broad social, cultural and behavioral relationship of the complex etiology of caries disease12.

In the present study, mothers and children who had dental caries or periodontal problems were referred for dental treatment and oral health education meetings.

The limitations of this study must be stated. The selection of the sample purely within the public health services may have been one limitation as it results in a sample with homogeneous social characteristics. The sample, after four years of monitoring, was reduced, due to the withdrawal of mothers over the course of the study, which may be considered a follow-up bias. Even so, the results produced valuable findings worthy of consideration due to the scientific evidence gathered in this type of study, as it is a longitudinal type of study and possible to evaluate the incidence of the disease in a specific period of time19. Multicentric studies are required to clarify if the results are common to other larger areas and populations with different characteristics. In future studies, ways should be included to ascertain the bacterial plaque index in the teeth of both mother and infant as well as a microorganism count.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that the behavioral aspects of the mother, such as the sharing of toothbrushes by family members and the child and the existence of non-nutritive sucking habits, have an impact on the development and experience of early childhood caries.

Accordingly, there is a need for the planning of preventive actions during the prenatal period concerning the promotion of oral health in the family context and the discouraging of the introduction of artificial teats in daily routine after the birth of the children.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank FAPESP (the São Paulo Research Foundation) for its financial support of the research study no. 2006/61615-9 and to CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) for the doctoral grant.

REFERENCES

1 Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034515573272 [ Links ]

2 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Coordenação Nacional de Saúde Bucal da População Brasileira. Projeto SB Brasil 2010: principais resultados. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2011 [citado 2016 Mar 10]. Disponível em: &lt;http://dab.saude.gov.br/CNSB/sbbrasil/arquivos/projeto_sb2010_relatorio_final.pdf&gt;. [ Links ]

3 Niji R, Arita K, Abe Y, Lucas ME, Nishino M, Mitome M. Maternal age at birth and other risk factors in early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32(7):493-8. [ Links ]

4 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Policy on Early Childhood Caries (ECC): Classifications, Consequences, and Preventive Strategies. Oral Health Policies. 2014;33(6):50-52. [ Links ]

5 Fisher-Owens SA, Gansky SA, Platt LJ, Weintraub JA, Soobader M, Bramlett MD, et al. Influences on children&apos;s oral Health: a conceptual model. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):e510-20. [ Links ]

6 Leong PM, Gussy MG, Barrow SY, Silva-Sanigorski A, Waters E. A systematic review of risk factors during first year of life for early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23(4):235-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01260.x [ Links ]

7 Wigen TI, Wang NJ. Maternal health and lifestyle, and caries experience in preschool children. A longitudinal study from pregnancy to age 5 yr. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(6):463-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00862.x [ Links ]

8 Zhou Y, Yang JY, Lo ECM, Lin HC. The Contribution of life course determinants to early childhood caries: a 2-Year cohort study. Caries Res. 2012;46(2):87-94. doi: 10.1159/000335574 [ Links ]

9 Moimaz SAS, Fadel CB, Lolli LF, Garbin CAS, Garbin AJÍ, Saliba NA. Social aspects of dental caries in the context of mother-child pairs. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22(1):73-8. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130122 [ Links ]

10 Moimaz SAS, Garbin CAS, Garbin AJI, Lima AMC, Lolli LF, Saliba O. Risk factors in the mother-child relationship that predispose to the development of early childhood caries. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(4):245-250. doi: 10.1007/s40368-014-0108-1 [ Links ]

11 Plonka KA, Pukallus ML, Barnett AG, Holcombe TF, Walsh LJ, Seow WK. A longitudinal case-control study of caries development from birth to 36 months. Caries Res. 2013;47(2):117-27. doi: 10.1159/000345073 [ Links ]

12 Weatherwax JA, Bray KK, Willians KB, Gadbury-Amyot CC. Exploration of the relationship between parent/guardian sociodemographics, intention, and knowledge and the oral health status of their children/wards enrolled in a Central Florida Head Start Program. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015;13(1):49-55. [ Links ]

13 Knevel RJM, Gussy M. Case study: caries in young children. Int J Dent Hyg. 2012;10(3):181-186. [ Links ]

14 Peres KG, Peres MA, Demarco FF, Gigante DP, Horta BL, Menezes AMB, Hallal PC. A saúde bucal nas coortes de nascimentos de Pelotas, RS, Brasil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2014;17(1):281-284. doi: 10.1590/1415-790X201400010022 [ Links ]

15 Müller IB, Castilhos ED, Camargo MBJ, Gonçalves H. Experiência de cárie e utilização do serviço público odontológico por escolares: estudo descritivo em Arroio do Padre, Rio Grande do Sul, 2013. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2015;24(4): 759-770. 10.5123/S1679-49742015000400018 [ Links ]

16 Cagnani A, Barros AMS, Sousa LLA, Oliveira AMG, Zanin L, Flório FM. Association between preference for sweet foods and dental caries. RGO, Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2014;62(1):25-29. [ Links ]

17 Neves PAM, Ribeiro CCC, Tenuta LMA, Leitão TJ, Monteiro-Neto V, Nunes AMM, Cury JA. Breastfeeding, Dental Biofilm Acidogenicity, and Early Childhood Caries. Caries Res. 2016;50:319-324. doi: 10.1159/000445910 [ Links ]

18 Rocha NB, Garbin AJI, Garbin CAS, Saliba O, Moimaz SAS. A longitudinal study on breastfeeding and factors related to early weaning. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2013;13(4):337-42. [ Links ]

19 Victora CG, Araújo CLP, Menezes AMB, Hallal PC, Vieira MF, Neutzling MB, et al. Methodological aspects of the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study. Rev Saúde Pública. 2006; 40(1):39-46. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102006000100008 [ Links ]

20 World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997. [ Links ]

21 Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J. 1975;25(4):229-35. [ Links ]

22 Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Programa Epi Info: Versão 7.0. [programa computador] [citado 2015 Nov 21]. Disponível em: &lt;http://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo/&gt;. [ Links ]

23 Ayres M, Ayres M Jr, Ayres DL, Santos AS. Programa BioEstat [programa de computador] Version 5.0.3. [citado 2015 Nov 21]. Disponível em: &lt;http://www.mamiraua.org.br/download/index.php?dirpath=./BioEstat%205%20Portugues&order=0&gt;. [ Links ]

24 Fadel CB, Saliba NA, Moimaz SAS. Mother-child relation: an interdisciplinary approach and their unfoldings for dentistry. Arq Odontol. 2008;44(3):42-8. [ Links ]

25 Choi HS, Ahn HY. Effects of mothers involved in dental health program for their children. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2012; 42(7):1050-61. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2012.42.7.1050 [ Links ]

26 Rocha NB, Moimaz SAS, Garbin AJI, Saliba O, Garbin CAS. Relationship between Perception of Oral Health, Clinical Conditions and Socio-Behavioral Factors of Mother-Child. Braz Res Pediatric Dent Integrated Clinic. 2015;15(1):113-121. [ Links ]

27 Valaitis R, Hesch R, Passarellia C, Sheehan D, Sinton J. A systematic review of the relationship between breastfeeding and early childhood caries. Can J Publ Health. 2000;91(6):411-7. [ Links ]

28 Ferreira CA, Savi GD, Panatto AP, Generoso JS, Barrichello T. Microbiological evaluation of bristles of frequently used toothbrushes. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17(4):72-6. doi: 10.1590/S2176-94512012000400016 [ Links ]

29 Costa SM, Abreu MHNG, Vasconcelos M, Lima RCGS, Verdi M, Ferreira EF. Desigualdades na distribuição da cárie dentária no Brasil: uma abordagem bioética. Cienc Saúde Colet. 2013;18(2):461-470. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232013000200017 [ Links ]

30 Massoni ACLT, Pereira RB, Nóbrega DRM, Costa LED, Fernandes JMFA, Rosenvlatt A. Assessment of pregnant, primiparous and postpartum women&apos;s knowledge about dental caries. RGO, Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2015;63(2):145-152. [ Links ]

Received: May 10, 2016; Revised: June 17, 2016; Accepted: September 28, 2016

Correspondência para / Correspondence to: SAS MOIMAZ. E-mail: <sasaliba@foa.unesp.br>.

Collaborators

NB ROCHA participated in literature review, study design, analysis and discussion of results, and contributed to the manuscript; O SALIBA participated in data analysis; CAS GARBIN and AJI GARBIN participated in data analysisand discussion and contributed to manuscript revision; SAS MOIMAZ conceived and coordinated the study, participated in data analysis and discussion and wrote and reviewed the manuscript. All listed authors contributed significantly to the study and manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License