Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

SPECIAL ZONES OF SOCIAL INTEREST USING MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS

Abstract

The article discusses the potential of spatial analysis supported by geoprocessing to characterize, analyse and indicate potential areas suitable to be specified in the designation of Special Areas of Social Interest - ZEIS in Teresina, Piauí. Among the spatial analyses, the application of the Multi-criteria Analysis model is noteworthy, it requires a clear definition of the objectives and consequently the selection of the main variable components for research, the production of thematic layers that portray the chosen variables, the application of a tenable criterion for assigning weights to the variables, and the calibration and validation of results. Partial analyzes are created regarding the distribution of areas of interest for environmental preservation in Teresina, in order to identify the adequacy of the indication of the delimitation of areas of social interest that do not result in conflicts with environmental value. There are also partial analyses to identify potential areas for occupation and urban expansion, in order to assess the suitability of the areas already defined as ZEIS, the areas recognized as settlements (vilas) and slums (favelas), and also to identify possible new areas for occupation by social housing.

Key words:
Geoprocessing; City Statute; Multi-criteria Analysis

Resumo

O artigo aborda o potencial da análise espacial apoiada por geoprocessamento para a caracterização, análise e indicação de áreas potenciais com condições para serem indicadas na delimitação de Zonas Especiais de Interesse Social - ZEIS em Teresina, Piauí. Entre as análises espaciais destaca-se a aplicação do modelo de Análise de Multicritérios, que requer clara definição de objetivos e consequente escolha das variáveis componentes principais para a investigação, a produção de camadas temáticas que retratem bem as variáveis escolhidas, a aplicação de um critério defensável para a atribuição de pesos para as variáveis, e a calibração e validação de resultados. São construídas análises parciais relativas à distribuição de áreas de interesse de preservação ambiental em Teresina, com vistas a identificar a adequabilidade da indicação da delimitação de áreas de interesse social que não resultem em conflitos com o valor ambiental. São construídas também análises parciais para identificação de áreas potenciais para a ocupação e expansão urbana, com vistas a avaliar a condição das áreas já delimitadas como ZEIS, das áreas reconhecidas como vilas e favelas, e também para a identificação de possíveis novas áreas para a ocupação por habitação de interesse social.

Palavras-chave:
Geoprocessamento; Estatuto da Cidade; Análise Multicritérios

Resumen

El artículo aborda el potencial del análisis especial apoyada por el geoprocesamiento para la caracterización, análisis e indicación de áreas potenciales como condiciones para que sean indicadas en la delimitación de Zonas Especiales de interés Social-ZEIS en Teresina, Piauí. Entre el análisis espaciales se destaca la aplicación del modelo de Análisis de Multicriterios, que requiere clara definición de objetivos y consecuente escoja de las variables componentes principales para la investigación, la producción de capas temáticas que retratan bien las variables escogidas, la aplicación de un criterio defensable para la atribución de pesos para las variables, y la validación de resultados. Son construidas análisis parciales relativos a la distribución de áreas de interés de preservación ambiental en Teresina, con vistas a identificar la adecuación de indicación de la delimitación de áreas de interés social que no resulten en conflictos con el valor ambiental. Son construidas también análisis parciales para identificación de áreas potenciales para la ocupación y expansión urbana, con vistas a evaluar la condición de las áreas ya delimitadas como ZEIS, de las áreas reconocidas como villas y favelas, y también para la identificación de posibles nuevas áreas para la ocupación por habitación de interés social. El trabajo responde al objetivo de utilizar las tecnologías de la geoinformación para apoyar la implantación de un de los instrumentos del Estado de la Ciudad (Ley Federal 10.257 de julio de 2001) en acciones de planeamiento y gestión urbana.

Palabras clave:
Geoprocesamiento; Estatuto de la ciudad; Análisis Multicriterios

INTRODUCTION

The zoning of Teresina was regulated by Law 3560/2006, whose logic was the recognition of the predominant types of use. As is the standard practice in zoning, it featured a description of each area according to the permitted uses, the utilization coefficient, the verges and occupancy rate, among others. It is worth noting that the Zoning and Master Plan in Teresina are restricted to the territorial space of the urban area and have not been defined for other regions of the municipality, although the City Statute states that the Master Plan should be municipal, not just urban. However, in the case of Teresina, due to the size of the municipality and the pattern of territorial occupation, the urban area already incorporates a significant area for territorial studies of the management of urban occupation.

From the 1980s, a new urbanist instrument began to be used in several Brazilian municipalities in the country: ZEIS - Special Areas of Social Interest, although this specific name was not used. In Belo Horizonte, for example, the concept was initially addressed in the Pró-Favela project (1983-1996) and in Rio de Janeiro in the Favela-Bairro Project (1994-2008) and other examples around the country, which then developed into the standard specified for this type of occupation. It is a product of the struggle of irregular settlements against eviction and in favor of the improvement of urban conditions and land regularization. The basic concept of the ZEIS instrument is to establish a particular urban pattern for settlement (BRAZIL, 2005BRASIL. Plano Diretor Participativo. Guia para a Elaboração pelos Municípios e Cidadãos, Ministério das Cidades, 2004.).

Teresina also went through the experiences of requalification programs of vilas and favelas through the Vila-Bairro Project, set up in 1997. Another experience based on the well-known Favela-District project used in Rio de Janeiro, its aim was to establish a new urban and social profile of the city's favelas. Its focus was directed at a housing policy with a new strategy for the favelas, as opposed to eviction practices; a new paradigm to combat inequalities.

The municipal managers at that time had a political platform for the city of Teresina based on two objectives: to boost the local economy and to improve the living conditions of the population. Among the sectors of municipal intervention housing, urban planning and the so-called "integrated actions" stood out which, from their content, should constitute the hallmark of the administration, due to their strategic character and great impact on the city's dynamics and in the design of urban space. In this sense, Vila-Bairro was considered the most important program promoting such integration (TERESINA, 1997TERESINA. Vila-Bairro. Teresina, PMT. 1997.).

The Vila-Bairro Project had the premise that the favelas would be urbanized and their inhabitants would be guaranteed permanence in the same dwelling places. Through a multi-sectoral intervention it aimed to take an important step towards the integration of this so-called "illegal" city with the legal city (MARICATO, 2001MARICATO, Ermínia. Brasil, cidades: alternativas para a crise urbana. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes. 2001.).

According to Lima (2008)LIMA, Antônia Jesuíta de. Gestão Local e Políticas Urbanas: uma experiência de urbanização de favelas em uma capital nordestina no Brasil, VI CONGRESSO PORTUGUES DE SOCIOLOGIA, Série 514. Lisboa. 2008. these were actions of a physical and urban nature, such as physical, community-focused and social infrastructure (road system, electricity network, water supply, implementation of social facilities, housing improvements, and urban regulation) deployed for employment and income generation projects and environmental education. The action was to take place simultaneously in 155 of the capital's favelas, involving a population of 116,000 inhabitants (17.7% of the population) and 29,095 households.

The operational strategy was based on two lines of action: the first with a systematic intervention in the program's areas using an integrated and inter-sectoral action through partnerships with other agencies and civil society. Secondly, with community participation as the basis of the intervention that should materialize in all stages of the project, acting as the main innovation as regards the relationship between the municipal government and the population (TERESINA, 1996TERESINA. Secretaria Municipal do Trabalho e de Assistência Social. Censo das vilas e favelas de Teresina, Teresina, PMT. 1996. and 1997TERESINA. Vila-Bairro. Teresina, PMT. 1997.).

Despite its origins being full of virtue, the project's design limited the goal of making an impact on the urban land occupation process and socio-spatial segregation. This was due both to the allocation of a significant portion of the planned resources (81%) and the asymmetry in the internal distribution of resources between the activities within each axis, and other operational and execution problems. Such problems have not eliminated the importance of the Vila-Bairro that undeniably had an important impact on many low-income settlements. It is perceived as one of the most extensive interventions in the favelas of Teresina. It is noteworthy that given the magnitude of urban problems in these areas, the program has had little impact on the process of socio-spatial segregation, not only because it did not solve the urban infrastructure needs in all the areas, but also because these actions were not accompanied by other integrative social policies (LIMA, 2008LIMA, Antônia Jesuíta de. Gestão Local e Políticas Urbanas: uma experiência de urbanização de favelas em uma capital nordestina no Brasil, VI CONGRESSO PORTUGUES DE SOCIOLOGIA, Série 514. Lisboa. 2008.).

Independently of whether the Vila-Bairro program achieved its stated goals for urban infrastructure, urban pressures forced governments to take initiatives that would enable access to public goods to those who had always been outside urban plans, public policies, and the gaze of the State and society. The government was forced to recognize the existence of another city, of the poor, institutionalizing the State's responsibility for this social segment.

Thus, actions to create land regularization programs and the urban renewal of vilas and favelas were observed in some Brazilian cities, until a federal instrument was established, the City Statute. One of its urban management tools was the inclusion of the ZEIS, which must be recognized in the Municipal Master Plan. The legal possibility of establishing a specific plan, suited to local conditions, reinforced the idea that the ZEIS add a benchmark for environmental quality in the rehabilitation of the space inhabited by vilas, favelas, housing estates with social fragility and poor infrastructure, and clusters that require urban intervention actions, with or without land regularization.

Establishing the ZEIS meant recognizing the diversity of occupations in the cities, as well as the possibility of constructing a legality that matched these settlement's needs. Thus, the instrument of the Special Zones of Social Interest was perceived as one of the tools for land rights regularization in paragraph "f" of item V of Article 4 of the City Statute (BRAZIL, 2005BRASIL. Plano Diretor Participativo. Guia para a Elaboração pelos Municípios e Cidadãos, Ministério das Cidades, 2004.).

It is the Master Plan's task to define the criteria for the use of the instruments established in the City Statute (Brazil, 2004BRASIL, Estatuto da Cidade - guia para implementação pelos municípios e cidadãos: Lei Nº 10.257, de 10 de julho de 2001, que estabelece diretrizes gerais da política urbana. ROLNIK, Raquel (coord). 3. ed. Brasilia: CEF / Pólis, 2005.). Among these criteria are Land Regularization, the specification of urban areas that are subject to the application of Urban Adverse Possession, the Special Use Concession for Housing Purposes, the Transfer of the Right to Build, and also the ZEIS. The goal was to meet the guidelines of urban policy, regarding the land regularization and urbanization of areas occupied by the low-income population, as well as unused or underused urban areas so that they would be used for social housing purposes by establishing detailed rules for the use and occupation of land and construction.

The organizational administrative structure of the Municipality of Teresina is made up of 25 municipal bodies, among these the Superintendence of Urban Development (SDUs - North, East Central, Southeast, South and Rural), which act as boroughs, and the Municipal Planning Secretariat (SEMPLAN), which are the local institutions that deal with housing policy.

According to Afonso (2012)AFONSO, Alcília.; VELOSO, Samara. Habitação de interesse social em Teresina: algumas reflexões. Teresina: EDUFPI, 2012. , various mechanisms of social control of urban policies were established, such as the Council of Urban Development / CDU (established in 1989); the Strategic Council of Teresina (established in 2002); the Management Council of the Municipal Fund for Social Interest Housing (established in 2008) and the Municipal Fund for Social Interest Housing (established in 2008). However, the author notes the lack of a specific organ in the municipal organizational chart to meet the specific issues of the ZEIS.

The zones are set out in Article 4 of Law 3560/2006. For the purposes of land use the urban area of Teresina is divided into zones: I - residential zones; II - commercial zones; III - zones for services; IV - industrial zones; V - special zones; VI - environmental preservation zones; and VII - zones of special social interest.

It can be observed that access to urbanized land by low income classes received a greater stimulus in the ZEIS, located in Residential Zone 1, where lots were designated for social interest programs and in Commercial Zones 4, 5 and 6, where mixed use was allowed. The same law that defines zoning also restricts social housing: Law 3560/2006, Article 24. "Subdivisions and residential buildings of social interest may only be built on in zones ZR1 and ZR2" because they are areas destined predominantly for residential use and are classified on the basis of parameters for population density, in this case characterized by low density occupation. (TERESINA, 2006TERESINA. Lei nº 3.560, de 20 de outubro de 2006. Define as diretrizes para uso do solo urbano do Município de Teresina e dá outras providências. 2006.).

As provided for in the Zoning of Teresina's Master Plan, the ZEIS are defined in Article 11 as "[...] comprising unused, underused and unbuilt land, deemed necessary for the implementation of housing programs for the low-income population, [...]".

According to data from the Municipality of Teresina and the Official Gazette of the Municipality, there are three ZEIS, established in accordance with the City Statute: Nova Brasilia (created by Complementary Law No. 3690 of 10th October, 2007), Parque Brasil (created by Complementary Law No. 3755 of 17th April, 2008) and ZEIS Árvores Verdes (created by Complementary Law No. 3789 of 18th July, 2008).

However, what is questioned here is that the boundaries of these small areas in the municipality fall short of the need to define urban areas destined for social interest housing. It is evident that the three defined areas are outlined as territories recognized as housing programs, but many areas that show the need for urban renewal, land regularization or are suitable for new occupations were dropped.

This study aims to identify new areas so the definition of areas of social interest is a more realistic picture of Teresina's reality. It was noted that in order to minimally meet the principles of the City Statute, Teresina's Master Plan delimited three ZEIS that fall far short of the existing needs and reality as there are many areas with the appropriate features to become ZEIS. Thus, the spatial analysis proposed herein has three goals, the first of which is to examine the conditions of the three ZEIS already defined in terms of these territories' suitability regarding possible conflicts with environmental interests and the conditions for urban settlement. Using a map that better reflects the reality of the existence of vilas and favelas in Teresina, the second objective is to evaluate the adequacy of each of these areas in terms of possible conflicts of interest with environmental preservation and to determine the suitability of their territories for urban use. This analysis acts as a base to support decisions on how to proceed with each unit. Finally, the third objective is to present synthesized maps, the first shows the need for environmental preservation in Teresina, the second showing potential occupation and urban expansion, and a third which is the combination of the first two and identifies areas of conflict of interest in the occupation of Teresina, in order to identify possible areas for the installation of new occupations of social interest.

METHODOLOGY

The technique of combining variables for multi-criteria analysis employs several methods.

One of the methods used in Multi-criteria Analysis is the Weighted Linear Combination (CLP) (VOOGD, 1983VOOGD, H. Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. London: Pion, 1983. 370 p.). With the CLP, the factors are combined by assigning a weight to each of them, followed by adding the results to produce an adaptation map according to the following expression:

(1)

This procedure is common in GIS and is very similar to a regression equation. In cases where Boolean constraints are applied, the procedure is modified by multiplying the calculated adjustment from factors from the product of restrictions. All GIS software has the basic routines for the use of this method. The basic question, however, lies in the standardization of the scores of the criteria and assigning weights.

Once the structure of the cartographic collection has been defined with the variables, they are combined with matrix algebra through the weighted average, which attributes weights for each layer or variables, and scores for each component of the key, suggested by specialists with specific knowledge of the territory in question. In this case, we chose the formulation of the weighted average proposed by Xavier da Silva (2001)XAVIER-DA-SILVA, Geoprocessamento para análise ambiental. Ed. do Autor, Rio de Janeiro, 2001. and Moura (2005)MOURA, Ana Clara M. Geoprocessamento na gestão e planejamento urbano. 2a. ed. Belo Horizonte: Ed. da Autora, 2005. 294 p. in the environmental assessments, which adopts the classifier algorithm represented by the following expression:

(2)

This expression allows the following reading:

n - Number of parameters (maps or PIs) used;

Aij - Probability of occurrence of the event analyzed in the element (pixel) I, j of the resulting (map) matrix;

Pk - Weight assigned to "k", in relation to the others, for the occurrence of the event being analyzed;

Nk - Score assigned to the category or class of parameter.

This procedure necessarily involves assigning of weights and scores to the different levels and categories of information involved, according to the level of significance in relation to the situation analyzed, so that the sum of the weights can not exceed 100%.

From this formulation of the Environmental Analysis, the following propositions can be made, also according to Xavier da Silva (2001)XAVIER-DA-SILVA, Geoprocessamento para análise ambiental. Ed. do Autor, Rio de Janeiro, 2001.:

  • Aij - Expresses the resulting probability of the product of the environmental formulation on a scale of 0 to 10, for the occurrence of an event or environmental organization that is caused, in principle, by the convergent action of the environmental parameters it considers;

  • The data involved in the evaluation can be placed on an ordinal scale that ranges between 0 and 10 or between 0 and 100, so that an amplitude variation sufficient to allow a greater perception of the variability of the estimates is generated;

  • The standardization of weights, restricted between the values 0 and 1, results in a definition of the weight value assigned to a map as the maximum amount that any of the classes that map can take. For example, assigning a 40% weight to the parameter "slope" in an analysis means that the maximum that a particular class on this map can contribute to the determination of the probability of occurrence of the event is 4, on a scale of 0 to 10.

  • With the adoption of the weighted average a classification space is created that, is ordinal in principle, but allows large and varied detail in the classification of estimates.

The process of crossing the information plans exemplifying the organization of a combination of matrices by assigning weights to each matrix or variable and scores for each component of the key of the matrices (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Illustration of the process of crossing the IP in the form of matrices with assigned weights and scores, the scores are the values contained in each cell according to the key, and the weights are attributed by information plan (in the example: vegetation, declivity and altimetry).

Once the layers are combined, the result is a potential surface, with results by the territorial unit of integration (or pixel) that the research set out to accomplish. The value obtained for each pixel of the resulting matrix signifies the extent to which each position is adequate or not (with a value of 0 to 10, with 0 being the least suitable) for the objective of the analysis.

ANALYSIS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS

Prior to the specific study to define the ZEIS areas a general examination of the urban territory was carried out to identify those areas most suitable for occupation and urban expansion, while also identifying the areas of greatest value for environmental preservation. Once these two portraits of urban reality had been created, they were compared in order to identify conflicts of interest between urban use and environmental protection.

To produce the maps of Synthesis of Environmental Interest and Synthesis of Interest for Urban Expansion, variables were selected that indicated the interest of each theme, mapped in the form of Thematic Maps, structured in the form of matrices or potential surfaces in the distribution of the phenomenon, according to the relevance of each variable and each synthesis.

The Synthesis of Environmental Interest was constructed by combining data on land use and occupation vegetation, altimetry, protected areas, declivities and flood areas. After the synthesis had been created the conditions of the three areas currently defined as ZEIS were verified for their degree of environmental conservation interest (Figure 2). It was observed that the ZEIS defined at present are located in areas of low environmental interest; in this context, no conflicts have been configured.

Figure 2
Synthesis of Environmental Interest emphasizing the regions where the existing ZEIS are located.

The Synthesis of Interest for Expansion and Urban Occupation was created by combining data on the presence of infrastructure and impediments to urban occupation, such as vegetation and protected areas, urban geotechnics, altimetry, declivity, flood areas, accessibility and capillarity identified by the presence and type of urban roads, and the existence of infrastructure represented by electricity, garbage collection, sewage and water network. Once the synthesis was constructed, the suitability of the three current areas delimited as ZEIS was verified to gauge the level of interest of urban expansion and occupation (Figure 3). It was observed is that the current ZEIS are in areas of medium or medium-low potential for urban expansion and occupation, which will require significant investments for correction and adjustment.

Figure 3
Synthesis of Interest for Occupation and Urban Expansion emphasizing the regions where the existing ZEIS are located.

With the two aforementioned syntheses in hand (details of which can be obtained in Reis Filho, 2012REIS FILHO, A. Aderson dos. Análise integrada por geoprocessamento da expansão urbana de Teresina com base no Estatuto da Cidade: estudo de potencialidades, restrições e conflitos de interesses. (Tese Doutorado), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Geociências. Belo Horizonte, 2012.), they were collated in the matrix of conflicting interests (Table 1). The matrix identified, for example, that a high or medium-high environmental interest combined with a high or medium-high urban interest indicates a conflict of interest. On the other hand, a low environmental interest with a high urban interest already reflects the predominance of urban interest, and so on.

Table 1
Matrix of Conflicting Interests

The combination of classes identified are: C - Conflict, U - Urban Interest, A - Environmental Interest, SC - No Conflict, Us - For Sustainable Urban Use, Ui - For Urban Interest but in need of Investment, Ai - For environmental interest but requiring investments, Ac - for Environmental Interest but with caution as there is risk of land invasion. The mapping of the results is displayed in the Matrix of Conflicting Interests and on the specialized map (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

Figure 4
Synthesis of Interest for Occupation and Urban Expansion emphasizing the regions where the existing ZEIS are located.

Figure 5
Collation of Environmental Protection of Interests and Potential Urban Expansion and Occupation.

Once the combination of interests had been mapped, they were compared with existing vila and favela areas in Teresina. A map of the municipality's vilas and favelas was obtained from the Municipal City Hall of Teresina, through PRODATER (Department of Planning and Superintendence of Rural Development) (Figure 6).

Figure 6
Map of Vilas and Favelas.

The comparison between the location of the vilas and favelas and the conflict of interest in the municipality (table 1) identified the areas in which these occupations were in accordance with the conditions and vocation of the location, areas where they agreed but needed requalification investments, areas where they were in accordance with urban conditions but needed regularization, areas of some environmental interest where occupation should be planned to take place in a sustainable way, and problem areas because they are located in areas of environmental interest. (Figure 7 and Figure 8).

Figure 7
Map showing Conditions for Interventions and the location of the existing ZEIS.

Figure 8
Map showing Conditions for Interventions inserted in areas of existing vilas and favelas.

The following combination of types were identified:

  • Table 1 - Combination matrix to identify Environmental and Urban Interests

  • C - Conflict: in areas of conflict of interest because there is interest in urban expansion, but also the need for environmental preservation, or areas of conflict that are of significant environmental interest. In such cases it would not be suitable to maintain the occupation, and specific projects should be designed to address the problem. On the map the name is "Environmental Problems".

  • UI - Urban with Investments: areas that pose no conflict of interest and which may receive the ZEIS but have poor infrastructure, which needs to be addressed so that the occupation becomes suitable. On the map the name is "Urban in accordance but With Investments".

  • U - Suitable occupation: these are in suitable locations for urban occupation and already have basic conditions for occupation. They are the most appropriate position for the location and permanence of the ZEIS. On the map the name is "Urban in Accordance but With Regulation".

  • UR - Urban with Restrictions: areas with average infrastructure conditions and urban occupation, but there is also average environmental interest. Consequently, these areas should receive special occupation projects and regulation and requalification of the landscape, as they require average investments and also require conditions for environmental sustainability. Urban use should happen in a sustainable way and increased population density is not advised. They are areas which, if positively transformed by well-made projects can have significant impact on the urban landscape and land use in Teresina. On the map the name is "Urban in Accordance but With Regulation".

RESULTS OF THE MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to observe various combinations ranging from conflict areas to favorable areas, that is, urban areas without conflict in the regions of vilas and favelas that are suitable for intervention to promote regularization. It is important to note that the conditions found in the resulting map for urban interventions benefit managers regarding the applicability of the instruments of the City Statute.

It was observed that the areas characterized as "environmental problems" and "Urban with restrictions" represent insignificant territorial extensions. The areas characterized as "Urban according to regulation" and "Urban according to investment" represent a significant territory, demonstrating unequivocally the possibility of the City Statute being employed to promote land regularization. The conditions of each of these in their intervention contexts act to support decision making.

Similarly, an analysis of the ZEIS was carried out to identify conditions for interventions. In this case, the most representative area, located in the ZEIS Parque Brasil, meets the condition "Urban according to investments". One result was the vast range of the category "according to regulation" that incontestably supports the use of the City Statute in promoting interventions for regularization.

A link has been established between the City Statute, through one of its valuable land regularization instruments known as the ZEIS and geoprocessing. This highlights the importance of technology as an analytical tool to support urban management, demonstrating the importance of combined analysis as a means of diagnosing existing conditions and identifying potential areas to define new regions intended for social interest occupation.

Considering the ZEIS pertaining to Residential Zones 1 and 2 as potential urban territory for popular use (Article 24 of Law 3.560/2006), it is possible to select areas suitable for this use in a significant portion of Teresina, covering more than 60% of the urban area. In other words, it can be said that approximately 60% of the urban area may be designated to this purpose, in terms of the infrastructure, access, and geotechnics and the absence of conflicts with environmental interests.

Of the three ZEIS already defined in the municipal Master Plan, two (Parque Brasil and Árvores Verdes) are far from the urban center. Therefore, in this context, the authorities should direct more attention and public policies accordingly, as the City Statute provides instruments to promote the social functions of the city and the Master Plan has the power to establish better land use.

The first contribution of this work is, of course, the specific collaboration with Teresina, which can immediately use the results to review their plans and instruments to define areas for housing and projects of social interest. Through these analyzes, which have reproducible and defensible criteria, one can argue about the identification of the areas with respect to the potential, limitations and conditions for the allocation of popular programs or urban expansion programs.

However, in addition to the aforementioned specific contribution, the main product of this work is the methodological approach that can be implemented in other municipalities. To mirror the methodology employed in other areas a minimum data set is required, which is quite possible on the scale of Brazil. The minimum and accessible variables to analyze environmental themes and urban expansion are considered to be those that best represent the specific characteristics of the area in question.

To characterize environmental variables, the basis would be:

  • Mapping of land use and land cover. This can be carried out expediently using Google Earth because the resolution or level of detail required for the polygons is on the planning scale and not the executive project, which would require a cadastral scale. The land use scale to integrate multi-criteria for the potential urban occupation can be given by mappings using media for visualizing medium resolution images. We had the privilege of working with high-resolution images, but visual inspection of territorial occurrences and mapping by block would also be acceptable.

  • Mapping of vegetation cover. This must be performed by RapidEye standard images, which in addition to the 5 meter pixel also has the RedEdge range (690-730 mm) and near infrared (760-850 mm) that can identify changes in chlorophyll levels and the cellular structure of plants. Because of these characteristics, a RapidEye image is suitable to separate vegetation from other land uses and to classify different conditions of vegetation cover. This favors mapping the robustness of the vegetation, which is important for urban planning. For urban planning the value of mapping the type of vegetation cover is secondary, since most species in the urban area are exotic, but the volume (trees, undergrowth) is essential. Rapid-eye images are now provided by the Ministry of Environment (Geocatálogo) upon the authorization of a request for institutional or academic use.

  • Mapping altimetry and declivity. In this particular case study, the city already had a good vectorial topographic base. However, in the absence of better data, it is possible to work with medium-quality data, with contour lines interpolated equidistantly by 15 meters, resulting from free-access Aster DEM satellite data. The user must take the appropriate care when handling errors (spurious pixels), but the average quality meets planning purposes in the expected range for an expeditious definition of strategic areas for occupation. Better detailing can be performed retrospectively, once the priority areas have been defined, and then surveys could be contracted for a project with a more executive character. This data source generates both altimetry and declivity maps.

  • Protected Areas. These have to use institutional data, which should be provided, even if in analog form, by the public sector. However, if the area has legal protection the perimeter of the listing will be defined, so it would be quite possible, at the municipal level, to draw those boundaries. There are states that already offer platforms with free access to digital maps containing the polygons of preservation areas.

  • The flood areas. This layer of information was very specific in the case of Teresina, as it is an important component for local planning due to the circumstances of the location. This preparation can be done by studying the digital elevation model and the identification of the flood quota with the support of field work, calibrated by consultations with public officials and the public about the memory of prior incidences. It is of significance, however, that in other municipalities other specific variables may be of greater interest.

To characterize variables of the condition of urban expansion , the basis would be:

  • Urban Geotechnics. This variable is not often present in urban mappings. However, there are already efforts by the Ministry of Cities in the discussion of the national spatial planning policy, Law 12608 of 2012, establishing the National Policy on Protection and Civil Defense that foresees the need to prepare maps to identify areas that are vulnerable to hazardous events. Thus, in the medium term municipalities need to join efforts to develop this variable.

  • Accessibility and capillarity. It is a fairly simple variable to determine as the municipality only needs a vector layer for roads, separated into type of public place. In general, it would be enough to separate roads or highways, avenues and streets, and if possible identify alleys. Once this is done, it is a model of concentration of streets that weighs their hierarchies according to the type of road.

  • Infrastructure for electricity, garbage collection, sewerage and water mains. Mapped from census returns and a database developed from the10-year census. These data are freely available in vector files and tables that can be attached to sectors using their univocal identification codes. This is possible for any Brazilian city.

  • The variables that would hinder growth due to declivity and vegetation cover follow the same logic as the layers designed for environmental studies.

To complete the methodology there is still the need to map the areas of vilas and favelas in the municipality, which can be done even if the authorities only provide analog products to the researcher. The recognition and the location of existing vilas and favelas is a requirement of the Master Plan. More than that: the City Statute states that the Master Plan must specify the ZEIS areas, with three conditions: those that identify and recognize the existing vilas and favelas, those that identify and recognize housing estates and those areas intended for future social housing projects.

Thus, in view of the above, the present methodology is accessible and replicable in other Brazilian urban realities. ArcGis commercial software was used, which was available at the university where the research was conducted, but the same process of preparation of layers of variables and use of map algebra could have been done using free software, also readily available. Thus the work fulfils the mission of the public university to promote discussions on methodological processes that can be employed by society for the common good.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study is the result of the Doctoral Thesis developed at the Institute of Geosciences of the Federal University if Minas Gerais - UFMG, with support from the DINTER program Federal University do Piauí - UFPI / UFMG.

The structure of this article is a contribution to the PROEXT 2013 program "Territorial Multipurpose Cadastre in the Meso West of Minas Gerais and Metropolitan Belo Horizonte," UFMG in partnership with the Ministry of Cities, in order to collaborate with the discussions on the applications of GIS in municipal planning and management, especially for the application of principles of the City Statute.

REFERÊNCIA BIBLIOGRÁFICA

  • AFONSO, Alcília.; VELOSO, Samara. Habitação de interesse social em Teresina: algumas reflexões. Teresina: EDUFPI, 2012.
  • AGENDA 21 Brasileira: resultado da consulta nacional / Comissão de Políticas de Desenvolvimento Sustentável e da Agenda 21 Nacional. 2. ed. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, 2004.
  • BRASIL. Lei Federal nº 10.257 10 de jul. de 2001. Regulamenta os Arts. 182 e 183 da Constituição Federal, estabelece diretrizes gerais da política urbana e dá outras providências.
  • BRASIL, Estatuto da Cidade - guia para implementação pelos municípios e cidadãos: Lei Nº 10.257, de 10 de julho de 2001, que estabelece diretrizes gerais da política urbana. ROLNIK, Raquel (coord). 3. ed. Brasilia: CEF / Pólis, 2005.
  • BRASIL. Plano Diretor Participativo Guia para a Elaboração pelos Municípios e Cidadãos, Ministério das Cidades, 2004.
  • LIMA, Antônia Jesuíta de. Gestão Local e Políticas Urbanas: uma experiência de urbanização de favelas em uma capital nordestina no Brasil, VI CONGRESSO PORTUGUES DE SOCIOLOGIA, Série 514. Lisboa. 2008.
  • MARICATO, Ermínia. Brasil, cidades: alternativas para a crise urbana. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes. 2001.
  • MOURA, Ana Clara M. Geoprocessamento na gestão e planejamento urbano 2a. ed. Belo Horizonte: Ed. da Autora, 2005. 294 p.
  • NUNES, Paulo. Conceito de árvore de decisão 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.knoow.net/cienceconempr/gestao/arvore_de_decisao.htm>. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2012.
    » http://www.knoow.net/cienceconempr/gestao/arvore_de_decisao.htm
  • REIS FILHO, A. Aderson dos. Análise integrada por geoprocessamento da expansão urbana de Teresina com base no Estatuto da Cidade: estudo de potencialidades, restrições e conflitos de interesses. (Tese Doutorado), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Instituto de Geociências. Belo Horizonte, 2012.
  • TERESINA. Vila-Bairro Teresina, PMT. 1997.
  • TERESINA. Secretaria Municipal do Trabalho e de Assistência Social. Censo das vilas e favelas de Teresina, Teresina, PMT. 1996.
  • TERESINA. Lei nº 3.560, de 20 de outubro de 2006. Define as diretrizes para uso do solo urbano do Município de Teresina e dá outras providências. 2006.
  • VOOGD, H. Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning London: Pion, 1983. 370 p.
  • XAVIER-DA-SILVA, Geoprocessamento para análise ambiental Ed. do Autor, Rio de Janeiro, 2001.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Jul-Sep 2016

History

  • Received
    Apr 2016
  • Accepted
    May 2016
Universidade Federal do Ceará UFC - Campi do Pici, Bloco 911, 60440-900 Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil, Tel.: (55 85) 3366 9855, Fax: (55 85) 3366 9864 - Fortaleza - CE - Brazil
E-mail: edantas@ufc.br