SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue4Correlations between Eucalyptus Clonal Cutting Quality and Performance after PlantingInfluence of Edaphic Attributes on the Distribution of Tree Species in a Riparian Forest in Southern Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • text new page (beta)
  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


Floresta e Ambiente

Print version ISSN 1415-0980On-line version ISSN 2179-8087

Floresta Ambient. vol.26 no.4 Seropédica  2019  Epub July 04, 2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.019516 

Original Article

Silviculture

Biological Control of Ceratocystis fimbriata by Bacillus subtilis on Acacia mearnsii Seedlings

Bacillus subtilis no Biocontrole de Ceratocystis fimbriata em Mudas de Acacia mearnsii

1Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil

2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil

3Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso (UFMT), Sinop, MT, Brasil

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Ceratocystis fimbriata isolates, obtained from Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit), on black wattle (Acacia mearnsii De Wild.) seedlings, the potential biological control exerted in vitro by Bacillus subtilis on C. fimbriata, and the in vivo effect of B. subtilis against C. fimbriata on black wattle seedlings. Isolates of C. fimbriata obtained and identified from kiwi plantations were used in pathogenicity tests on A. mearnsii seedlings. In vitro, the antagonistic potential of B. subtilis on the pathogen was analyzed by direct confrontation tests. To evaluate the effect of B. subtilis in vivo, black wattle seedlings were inoculated with Rhizolyptus® seven days before and after pathogen inoculation. On black wattle seedlings, C. fimbriata isolates caused 44,15% to 100% severity. Direct confrontation tests revealed that the strains were effective in the biological control of C. fimbriata isolates in vitro. In vivo, Rizolyptus® was not efficient in controlling C. fimbriata.

Keywords: fungus; wilt; bioprotector

RESUMO

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o comportamento de isolados de Ceratocystis fimbriata obtidos de kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa) em mudas de acácia-negra (Acacia mearnsii De Wild.), o potencial de biocontrole in vitro de Bacillus subtilis sobre C. fimbriata e o comportamento in vivo de B. subtilis contra C. fimbriata em mudas de acácia-negra. Isolados de C. fimbriata obtidos e identificados em plantios de kiwi foram utilizados em testes de patogenicidade em mudas de A. mearnsii. O potencial antagônico in vitro de B. subtilis sobre o patógeno foi analisado em testes de confrontação direta. Para avaliar o comportamento in vivo de B. subtilis, as mudas de acácia-negra foram inoculadas com Rizolyptus® sete dias antes e após a inoculação do patógeno. Nas mudas de acácia-negra os isolados de C. fimbriata exibiram percentuais de severidade que variam de 44,15% a 100%. Nos testes de confrontação direta as cepas mostraram-se eficientes no biocontrole in vitro sobre os isolados de C. fimbriata. In vivo, o produto Rizolyptus® não foi eficiente no controle de C. fimbriata.

Palavras-chave: fungos; murcha; biocontrole

1. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Black wattle plantations (Acacia mearnsii De Wild.) are important mainly for family farming. Their economic importance relies on bark extracts that are used to produce tannin and timber and on their exportation for cellulose manufacturing (Schumacher et al., 2003). For the first time in Brazil, Ribeiro et al. (1988) reported the infection of black wattle by Ceratocystis fimbriata Ellis & Halsted, which resulted in wilting or death. It has been verified, since 2001, in commercial plantations of black acacia in Rio Grande do Sul (RS), the presence of C. fimbriata attack in isolated sites (Santos & Ferreira, 2003). In kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) plantations in the region of Farroupilha, RS, symptoms of wilt, wood browning and reduced size fruits were caused by C. fimbriata. This pathogen has been causing damage to the producers, assuming economic importance, due to the high susceptibility of the grafted material, compromising the establishment of the crop (Piveta et al., 2013).

This fungus initially colonizes the cambium between the bark and wood, which is a typical characteristic of the xylem pathogen. A typical symptom manifests in cross sections of woody organs and appears as dark radial striations (Baker & Harrington, 2004). The ascending colonization by the pathogens happens very fast in trees suffering from water stress as a consequence of the attack, which increases the occurrence of radial dark striations towards the base apex (Ferreira et al., 2006).

Information on the behavior of this pathogen is obtained through pathogenicity tests in cross inoculations and is important to support strategies for disease control and prevention. Genetic control has been used; however, results are obtained over the long term (Silva et al., 2004). Alternative techniques are important in the control of ceratocystis wilt, since the use of fungicides is restricted due to a lack of registration within the Ministry of Agriculture and Supply.

Studies involving biological control have been increasing and they include in vitro and in vivo tests with B. subtilis. Endophytic organisms, such as B. subtilis, present control mechanisms that involve the production of antibacterial and antifungal substances (Castillo et al., 2006). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of C. fimbriata isolated obtained from kiwifruit in black wattle seedlings, and to investigate the biological control potential exerted by B. subtilis on C. fimbriata in black wattle seedlings in vitro and in vivo.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pathogenicity tests and in vivo experiments were carried out at the Forest Nursery of the Center of Rural Sciences (CRS), Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS. In vitro experiments were performed in the Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Department of Plant Protection of UFSM.

2.1. Isolates of Ceratocystis fimbriata

Five isolates (PM08, PM29, PP08, PC03, and PB01) of C. fimbriata, belonging to the mycology collection of the Laboratory of Plant Pathology “Elocy Minussi” at UFSM were used. The isolates were obtained from soil samples and kiwi plant material (Monty, Elmwood, and Hayward cultivars), which presented typical symptoms of the disease in four orchards located in the region of Farroupilha, RS (Table 1) (Piveta et al., 2013).

Table 1 Geographic coordinates, date of collection, and access number for Ceratocystis fimbriata isolates obtained in the region of Farroupilha, RS. 

Isolate Coordinates Date of collection
PB01 S 29°09'.022" W 51°24'.805" Jul/2010
PC03 S 29°09'.505" W 51°22'.783" Jul/2010
PM08 S 29°14'.242" W 51°23'.187" Jul/2010
PM29 S 29°14'.242" W 51° 23'.187" Jul/2010
PP08 S 29°11'.751" W 51° 24'.118" Jul/2010

Source: Piveta et al. (2016).

2.2. Pathogenicity test in black wattle seedlings

Black wattle seedlings (A. mearnsii), aged approximately six months old and 0,5 m tall, were transplanted into 1,5 L plastic bags containing commercial substrate Carolina Soil®.

Five isolates of C. fimbriata were transferred to Petri dishes (90 mm) containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium and maintained in an incubator at 25°C for 10 days, with a 12 hours photoperiod. Subsequently, 10 mL of sterile distilled water were added to the plates. After scraping the colony surface with a Drigalski spatula, the spore suspension was filtered through a double layer of gauze and calibrated to 2,5 × 106 spores mL-1 (Laia et al., 2000).

The plants were inoculated by performing a cross superficial incision from the stem to approximately 5 cm above the collar region. The opening of the incision was completed with the aid of a utility knife, into which approximately 0,5 mL of spore suspension was inoculated. The wound was covered with plastic PVC film to prevent dryness and contamination by other microorganisms. For controlled plants, sterile distilled water was used instead of inoculum suspension. After inoculation, the plants were kept in a greenhouse for 30 days before evaluation (Mafia et al., 2011). Four repetitions of three seedlings were used.

2.2.1. Disease severity assessment

As described by Piveta et al. (2013), the disease severity percentages of the isolates were calculated with the equation:

S = LL × HP-1 × 100LL: lesion length; HP: plant height. (1)

2.2.2. Reisolation of Ceratocystis fimbriata

For the reisolation of C. fimbriata isolates, host stem fragments were utilized using the carrot slice method described by Laia et al. (2000).

2.2.3. Isolation of monoascospore cultures

With a needle, a mass of ascospores was transferred from a single perithecium to another plate containing agar water (AW) medium (20 g agar and 1 L distilled water), supplemented with antibiotic (streptomycin), at a concentration of 100 µL.mL-1. After transferring, the ascospore mass was spread onto a Petri dish with the aid of a Drigalski spatula. The plates were subsequently incubated in the dark, at 25ºC for 24 hours and a needle was then used to extract the chain of endoconidia. The conidia attached to the needle were transferred to the center of another Petri dish, containing PDA medium supplemented with antibiotics (streptomycin), to be subsequently incubated under the same conditions for 15 days (Alfenas et al., 2007).

2.3. Evaluation of the antagonistic activity of Bacillus subtilis on Ceratocystis fimbriata in direct confrontation tests

For paired cultures tests, a commercial product based on B. subtilis (UFV 3918), i.e., Rizolyptus®, was used with the same C. fimbriata isolates used in the pathogenicity tests on black wattle seedlings.

For the tests, a 7 mm dish containing C. fimbriata mycelium in PDA medium was transferred to the center of a 90 mm Petri dish containing PDA medium. The plates were then incubated at 25ºC for 7 days, with a 12 hours photoperiod. After this period, four discs containing B. subtilis (UFV 3918) bacterial cells, grown in PDA culture medium for 48 hours at 25°C, were placed equidistant from each other and from the center of the Petri dish. The plates were kept in an incubator for seven days under the same conditions and the antagonistic activities were evaluated after this period and compared to those observed on control plates containing only the pathogen (adapted from Sottero et al., 2006).

During the incubation, the plates were evaluated daily and the mycelial growth of the pathogen isolates was measured with the aid of a digital caliper. To calculate the percentage inhibition of mycelial growth, the following formula was used:

% inhibition = ([r.g.cont r.g.treat] ÷ r.g.cont) ×100r.g.cont: radial growth of controls; r.g.treat: radial growth of treated samples (Menten et al., 1976). Each treatment consisted in four replicates. (2)

2.4. In vivo assay of Ceratocystis fimbriata × Bacillus subtilis on black wattle seedlings

From the results obtained in the tests described under sections 2.2 and 2.3, the composition of the treatments (T) was established as follows: T1 - control seedlings, using only sterile distilled water; T2 - seedlings inoculated only with Rizolyptus®; T3 - Rizolyptus® inoculated seven days before the isolate PP08; T4 - Rizolyptus® inoculated seven days before the isolate PM29; T5 - seedlings inoculated only with the isolate PP08; T6 - seedlings inoculated only with the isolate PM29; T7 - Rizolyptus® inoculated seven days after the isolate PP08; T8 - Rizolyptus® inoculated seven days after the isolate PM29.

With the aid of a utility knife, a small longitudinal incision was made up to approximately 5 cm above the collar region of black wattle seedlings into which approximately 1 mL of commercial Rizolyptus® was inoculated. The wound was covered with plastic PVC film to prevent dryness and contamination by other organisms.

After seven days, the spore suspensions of PM29 and PP08 of C. fimbriata isolates were inoculated as described under section 3.3, i.e., 1 cm longitudinally to the area where Rizolyptus® was inoculated (T3 and T4). Seedlings containing only spore suspension isolates (T5 and T6) or only Rizolyptus® (T2) were inoculated. Controlled plants were treated only with sterile distilled water (T1). The seedlings were inoculated with Rizolyptus® (T7 and T8), seven days after pathogen inoculation as previously described (Brooks et al., 1994). The plants were kept in a greenhouse for 30 days. The antagonist potential of B. subtilis was evaluated through the disease severity percentages of the isolates, the reisolation of the pathogen, and the isolation of monoascoporic cultures, which were performed according to the methodologies described under sections 2.2.1, 2.2.2, and 2.2.3, respectively. Four repetitions containing three seedlings each were used.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The analysis of variance was carried out by comparing the means with the Tukey’s test, at 5% probability, using the software SISVAR 5.3 (Ferreira, 2010). To analyze the results, the data were transformed from percentages to arcsine, square root (×/100)0.5.

3. RESULTS

In the pathogenicity tests on black wattle seedlings, the isolates of C. fimbriata showed different levels of disease severity (Figure 1). Significant severity percentages were observed for PM29, PP08, PM08, and PC03 isolates, which were different from those obtained for the controlled seedlings, which were inoculated with sterile distilled water and did not present symptoms that resulted in drying or wilting. The PM29 isolate caused the death of all the seedlings (Figure 2) within 28 days and this was not statistically different from the observed for the isolate PP08, which presented severity of 94,03%. These isolates were responsible for the greatest number of plants presenting symptoms that resulted in wilting and death.

Figure 1 Disease severity (%) of ceratocystis wilt on seedlings of Acacia mearnsii, inoculated with C. fimbriata isolates obtained from kiwifruit. (*): averages followed by the same letter do not differ among themselves by the Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05). Coefficient of variation (%) = 19,08. 

Figure 2 Pathogenicity test of C. fimbriata in Acacia mearnsii seedlings. (A): dead plant inoculated with isolated PB01 and the control treatment inoculated only with sterile distilled water; (B): control and dead plant inoculated with isolate PC03. 

PC03 and PM08 isolates followed the same trend in the manifestation of symptoms, with a severity > 50%. These isolates did not statistically differ among themselves and PP08 and PB01; however, they were significantly different from the control. The PB01 isolate exhibited the lowest severity percentage (44,15%) and was not statistically different from the observed in the control and the PC03 and PM08 isolates of C. fimbriata.

The average percentage inhibition of mycelial growth of C. fimbriata isolates (Figure 3 and 4) indicated that Rizolyptus® was more efficient at controlling the PP08 isolate, followed by the PC03, PM08, and PM29 isolates with 32,2%, 29,77%, 28,58%, and 26,33% inhibition, respectively. The PB01 isolate presented the lowest percentage inhibition (14,12%) in vitro. In this isolate, the bacteria allowed the fungus to grow for up to 120 hours after the cultures were paired, opposite to that observed for other isolates of C. fimbriata, in which the bacteria inhibited mycelial growth 96 hours after the start of direct confrontation.

Figure 3 Percentage of mycelial growth inhibition (%) of PP08, PM29, PM08, PC03, and PB01 C. fimbriata isolates, obtained from kiwifruit and paired with the commercial form of Bacillus subtilis Rizolyptus®. 

Figure 4 Culture pairing for B subtilis in the commercial form Rizolyptus® and isolated PC03 C. fimbriata. (A): Rizolyptus® x PC03; (B): control treatment with isolated PC03 only. 

All seedlings inoculated with PM29 and PP08 isolates and the biological control agent presented symptoms that resulted in wilting and death (100% severity). The disease severity percentages of seedlings inoculated only with Rizolyptus® (T2) (2,67%) or controls (T1) (3,04%) inoculated only with sterile distilled water were not statistically different (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Disease severity (%) on the in vivo biological control test of the commercial form of B. subtilis Rizolyptus® on PM29 and PP08 C. fimbriata isolates, obtained from kiwifruit on Acacia mearnsii seedlings. T1: seedlings inoculated only with sterile distilled water; T2: seedlings inoculated only with Rizolyptus®; T3 and T4: seedlings inoculated with Rizolyptus® seven days before PP08 and PM29 isolates; T5 and T6: seedlings inoculated only with PP08 and PM29 isolates; T7 and T8: seedlings inoculated with Rizolyptus® seven days after PP08 and PM29 isolates; (*): averages followed by the same letter do not differ among themselves by the Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05). Coefficient of variation (%) = 0,38. 

Seedlings inoculated with B. subtilis (Rizolyptus®) seven days before (T3 and T4) or seven days after the pathogen (T7 and T8), showed the same characteristics as plants inoculated with C. fimbriata isolates alone (T5 and T6).

The first wilt symptoms were observed 15 days after inoculation with the fungus. The symptoms evolved gradually, regardless of the presence of bacteria when inoculated before and after the pathogen. On day 28 of the experiment, all plants inoculated with C. fimbriata died after reaching a severity of 100% (Figure 6).

Figure 6 Acacia mearnsii seedlings inoculated with B. subtilis in commercial form Rizolyptus® over isolated PP08 from C. fimbriata. (A): seedling inoculated only with Rizolyptus®; (B): control inoculated only with sterile distilled water; (C) seedling inoculated with Rizolyptus® seven days before the isolated PP08; (D): seedling only inoculated with the isolated PP08; (E) seedling inoculated with Rizolyptus® seven days after the isolated PP08. 

4. DISCUSSION

The results suggest that the PC03, PM08, PP08, and PM29 isolates of C. fimbriata were pathogenic to black wattle. Symptoms of C. fimbriata infection on black wattle seedlings were initially observed as plants’ closing their leaflets, which became yellow, wilted, and dry, leading to leaflets fall, and, consequently, death of the plant. According to Firmino et al. (2013), after 30 days inoculation of C. fimbriata, some plants of Eucalyptus spp. already had wilt symptoms, characteristic of this pathogen. Still according to these authors, from this wilt, in a short period of time it was possible to observe pointer dryness and death of some plants. During the conduction of field experiments, it was observed that most progenies of Eucalyptus spp. inoculated did not present expressive symptoms of wilt, being these only noticed in hotter hours of the day or in the presence of water stress, but in a subtle way. However, 90 days after inoculation, the plants showed xylem discoloration and pathogen structures inside them. Thus, these apparently asymptomatic plants were susceptible to the isolates studied and would probably die if they were kept longer under greenhouse conditions.

According to Harrington et al. (2011), the isolates identified in Brazil do not have host specializations, since their levels of aggressiveness vary according to the species. In cross-inoculation tests, Johnson et al. (2005) observed that C. fimbriata isolates were able to induce symptoms in general that are different from those used to obtain the isolates. Therefore, Quercus isolates lead to discoloration of the xylem in Prunus plants. When inoculated with isolates obtained from Prunus, Carya and Populus, plants also showed symptoms of the disease.

B. subtilis proved to be effective for biological control in vitro, showing zones of inhibition even before direct contact with the pathogen, which can be attributed to the effect of antibiosis, characterized by the production of volatile metabolites released by the bacteria, in addition to the competition for nutrients and space, which thus interferes with the growth of C. fimbriata isolates. According to Kim et al. (2008), the inhibitory effect of bacteria, such as B. subtilis, may be attributed to the production of hydrolytic enzymes that are capable of degrading the cellular wall and impairing lipopeptide (LPP) production, thereby directly interfering with the mycelial growth of plant pathogenic fungi. In their studies, Seema & Devaki (2012) reported that B. subtilis strains could inhibit 50% Rizoctonia solani mycelial growth five days after the cultures were paired. According to these authors, the action of antibiotics, such as Iturin A and Surfactin, may have influenced mycelial growth and color of the pathogen colony.

Lee et al. (2008) found that in confrontation tests of 12 colonies of B. subtilis, isolated from different locations of the rhizosphere, on isolates of Phytophthora capsici, five colonies, R15, R22, R30, R32, and R33, presented maximum inhibition of the pathogen with zones of inhibition measuring 11,5 mm, 11 mm, 11,5 mm, 12 mm, and 12 mm, respectively. The same colonies were efficient in the biological control of P. citrophthora, P. citricola, and Colletotrichum coccodes. According to the authors of that study, the genus Bacillus, which was already established as a plant growth promoter, also plays an important role in controlling soil plant pathogens.

The average percentage inhibition of mycelial growth of C. fimbriata isolates revealed that Rizolyptus® was more efficient at controlling the PP08 isolate, followed by PC03, PM08, and PM29 isolates, which presented inhibition percentages of 32,2%, 29,77%, 28,58% and 26,33%, respectively. The PB01 isolate showed the lowest percentage inhibition in vitro, i.e., 12,14%. For this isolate, the bacteria permitted growth up to 120 hours after the cultures were paired, contrary to other isolates of C. fimbriata, in which the bacteria inhibited mycelial growth 96 hours after direct confrontation. According to Melo & Valarini (1995), 0G and 5G isolates of B. subtilis significantly inhibited mycelial growth of Fusarium solani in vitro. The percentage of inhibitions were 53,37 (5G) and 71.75% (0G). Corroborating the results obtained by the authors mentioned above, Shiomi et al. (2008) found that with the same 0G isolate of B. subtilis, satisfactory inhibition of Fusarium moniliforme, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Exserohilum turcicum were observed, with values of 53,84%, 48,97%, 42,68% and 46,68%, respectively. However, the percentages inhibition obtained in this study were lower than 50%, which may be related to the physiology of C. fimbriata isolates presenting lower mycelial growth than the pathogens previously cited.

Remuska & Dalla Pria (2007) confirms the biological control potential of the genus Bacillus. In their studies, it was found that Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was unable to form sclerotia, an important structure for their resistance when paired with Bacillus thuringiensis. The bacteria inhibited mycelial growth of the pathogen by 37,44% and the presence of an inhibition halo was also observed by the authors.

According to Kupper et al. (2003), B. subtilis isolates were efficient at controlling Colletotrichum acutatum in vitro. Antagonistic bacteria, such as B. subtilis, usually acts by antibiosis, competition and parasitism. Their antibiosis activity can inhibit the growth of a wide variety of species, mostly via the production of toxic substances, which is the most efficient mechanism to control plant pathogens.

Marroni & Germani (2011) concluded that B. subtilis antagonized 9% of mycelial growth of Macrophomina phaseolina when paired in vitro. Based on their studies, the authors observed that the antagonistic potential of strains isolated from wild plants is higher when compared to strains isolated from cultivated plants.

Unlike the control observed in vitro, B. subtilis strains were not efficient at controlling C. fimbriata in vivo, as all seedlings inoculated with the PM29 and PP08 isolates presented symptoms that resulted in wilting and death. Bell et al. (1982) pointed out that biological control tests in vitro are used for prior mass selection of possible candidates as antagonists. They highlight that not all biological controls in vitro will display antagonist mechanisms in vivo.

Moreira & May De Mio (2015) obtained unsatisfactory results in vivo in the control exerted by Bacillus sp. on Colletotrichum acutatum in apple trees (Malus domestica). According to the authors, Serenade®, that is, the commercial form of B. subtilis, did not provide any significant protection against the number of spots caused by Colletotrichum spp. It is worth noting that the natural habitat of bacteria belonging to the genus Bacillus is the soil, although in this work and in the studies previously mentioned, the biological control was tested under different environmental conditions (stems and leaves), which might naturally have interfered with the mechanisms of action. Stockwell et al. (1998) point out that the satisfactory results obtained in vitro do not always reflect effectiveness in the field. For these authors, good results in vitro should be used as parameters to determine the viability of the control method under real conditions of infection. In this study, the failure of effective control in vivo supports the necessity of further investigations, especially referring to inoculation methods and bioprotector concentration.

5. CONCLUSIONS

PC03, PM08, PP08, and PM29 isolates of C. fimbriata obtained from kiwifruit are pathogenic to Acacia mearnsii.

B. subtilis is efficient in the biological control of C. fimbriata isolates in vitro, whereas it is not able to control the wilting of ceratocystis on black wattle seedlings, inoculated with PM29 and PP08 isolates of C. fimbriata in vivo.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) for the granting of a doctoral scholarship to Ricardo Mezzomo and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the Research Productivity Exchange of the co-author Marlove Fatima Brião Muniz.

REFERENCES

Alfenas AC, Ferreira FA, Mafia RG, Gonçalves RC. Isolamento de fungos fitopatogênicos. In: Alfenas AC, Mafia RG, editors. Métodos em fitopatologia. Viçosa: Editora UFV; 2007. p. 53-90. [ Links ]

Baker CJ, Harrington TC. Ceratocystis fimbriata. Surrey: Cabi; 2004. [ Links ]

Bell DK, Wells HD, Markham CR. In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against six fungal plant pathogens. Phytopathology 1982; 72(4): 379-382. 10.1094/Phyto-72-379 [ Links ]

Brooks DS, Gonzalez CF, Appel DN, Filer TH. Evaluation of endophytic bacteria as potential biological control agents for oak wilt. Biological Control 1994; 4(4): 373-381. 10.1006/bcon.1994.1047 [ Links ]

Castillo UF, Strobel GA, Mullenberg K, Condron MM, Teplow DB, Folgiano V et al. Munumbicins E-4 and E-5 novel broad-antibiotics from Streptomyces NRRL 3052. FEMS Microbiology Letters 2006; 255(2): 296-300. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00080.x [ Links ]

Ferreira DF. Sisvar: versão 5.3. Lavras: UFLA, 2010. [ Links ]

Ferreira FA, Maffia LA, Barreto RW, Demuner NL, Pigatto S. Sintomatologia da murcha de Ceratocystis fimbriata em eucalipto. Revista Árvore 2006; 30(2): 155-162. 10.1590/S0100-67622006000200001 [ Links ]

Firmino AC, Tozze HJ Jr, Souza ICG, Furtado EL. Resistência de genótipos de eucalipto a Ceratocystis spp. Scientia Florestalis 2013; 41(98): 165-173. [ Links ]

Harrington TC, Thorpe DJ, Alfenas AC. Genetic variation and variation in aggressiveness to native and exotic hosts among Brazilian populations of Ceratocystis fimbriata. Phytopathology 2011; 101(5): 555-566. 10.1094/PHYTO-08-10-0228 [ Links ]

Johnson JA, Harrington TC, Engelbrecht CJ. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the North American clade of the Ceratocystis fimbriata complex. Mycologia 2005; 97(5): 1067-1092. [ Links ]

Kim HS, Sang MK, Jeun Y-C, Hwang BK, Kim KD. Sequential selection and efficacy of antagonistic rhizobacteria for controlling Phytophthora blight of pepper. Crop Protection 2008; 27(3-5): 436-443. 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.07.013 [ Links ]

Kupper KC, Guimenes-Fernandes N, Goes A. Controle biológico de Colletotrichum acutatum, agente causal da queda prematura dos frutos cítricos. Fitopatologia Brasileira 2003; 28(3): 251-257. 10.1590/S0100-41582003000300005 [ Links ]

Laia M L, Alfenas AC, Harrington TC. Isolation, detection in soil, and inoculation of Ceratocystis fimbriata, causal agent of wilting, die-back and canker in Eucalyptus. Fitopatologia Brasileira 2000; 25: 384. [ Links ]

Lee KJ, Kamala-Kannan S, Sub HS, Seong CK, Lee GW. Biological control of Phytophthora blight in red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) using Bacillus subtilis. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2008; 24(7): 1139-1145. 10.1007/s11274-007-9585-2 [ Links ]

Mafia RG, Alfenas AC, Ferreira EM, Binoti DHB. Métodos de seleção e identificação de fontes de resistência à murcha do eucalipto causada por Ceratocystis fimbriata. Revista Árvore 2011; 35(4): 817-824. 10.1590/S0100-67622011000500007 [ Links ]

Marroni IV, Germani JC. Eficiência de rizobactérias Bacillus spp. no controle in vitro de Macrophomina phaseolina agente etiológico da podridão de tronco da mamona (Ricinus communis L). Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia 2011; 6(3): 159-167. [ Links ]

Melo IS, Valarini PJ. Potencial de rizobactérias no controle de Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. em pepino (Cucumis sativum L.). Scientia Agricola 1995; 52(2): 326-330. 10.1590/S0103-90161995000200020 [ Links ]

Menten JOM, Machado CC, Minussi CC, Castro C, Kimati H. Efeito de alguns fungicidas no crescimento micelial de Macrophomina phaseolina (Tass.) Goid “in vitro”. Fitopatologia Brasileira 1976; 1(2): 57-66. [ Links ]

Moreira RR, May De Mio LL. Potential biological agents isolated from apple fail to control Glomerella leaf spot in the field. Biological Control 2015; 87: 56-63. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.04.020 [ Links ]

Piveta G, Alfenas AC, Muniz MFB, Valdebenito-Sanhueza RM, Ferreira MA. Ocorrência de Ceratocytis fimbriata em kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa) no sul do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 2013; 35(2): 665-669. 10.1590/S0100-29452013000200040 [ Links ]

Piveta G, Ferreira MA, Muniz MFB, Valdetaro D, Valdebenito-Sanhueza R, Harrington T et al. Ceratocystis fimbriata on kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.) in Brazil. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2016; 44(1): 13-24. 10.1080/01140671.2016.1143020 [ Links ]

Remuska AC, Dalla Pria M. Efeito de Bacillus thuringiensis e Trichoderma sp. no crescimento de fungos fitopatogênicos. Publicatio UEPG 2007; 13(3): 31-36. 10.5212/publicatio.v13i03.893 [ Links ]

Ribeiro IJA, Fumikoito M, Paradela Filho O, Castro JL. Gomose da acácia-negra causada por Ceratocystis fimbriata. Bragantia 1988; 47(1): 71-74. 10.1590/S0006-87051988000100008 [ Links ]

Santos AF, Ferreira FA. Murcha de Ceratocystis em acácia-negra no Brasil. Fitopatologia Brasileira 2003; 28(3): 325. 10.1590/S0100-41582003000300020 [ Links ]

Schumacher MV, Brun EJ, Rodrigues LM, Santos EM. Retorno de nutrientes via deposição de serapilheira em um povoamento de acácia-negra (Acacia mearnsii De Wild) no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Árvore 2003; 27(6): 791-798. 10.1590/S0100-67622003000600005 [ Links ]

Seema M, Devaki NS. In vitro evaluation of biological control agents against Rhizoctonia solani. Journal of Agricultural Technology 2012; 8(1): 233-240. [ Links ]

Shiomi HF, Melo IS, Minhoni MTA. Seleção de bactérias endofíticas com ação antagônica a fitopatógenos. Scientia Agraria 2008; 9(4): 535-538. [ Links ]

Silva SDVM, Paim MC, Castro WM. Cacau “jaca” resistente a Ceratocystis fimbriata na região cacaueira da Bahia, Brasil. Fitopatologia Brasileira 2004; 29(5): 538-540. 10.1590/S0100-41582004000500011 [ Links ]

Sottero NA, Freitas SS, Melo AMT, Trani PE. Rizobactérias e alface: colonização rizosférica, promoção de crescimento e controle biológico. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2006; 30(2): 225-234. 10.1590/S0100-06832006000200004 [ Links ]

Stockwell VO, Johnson KB, Loper JE. Establishment of bacterial antagonists of Erwinia amylovora on pear and apple blossoms as influenced by inoculum preparation. Phytopathology 1998; 88(6): 506-513. 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.6.506 [ Links ]

Received: April 13, 2016; Accepted: June 10, 2018

CORRESPONDENCE TO Ricardo Mezzomo Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Av. Roraima, 1.000, prédio 42, sl. 3221, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil e-mail: mezzomoricardo@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License