FUNDAMENTO: Exercícios resistidos e aeróbicos são recomendados para reduzir o peso e melhorar a saúde, mas ainda não foi definido qual dos dois tipos é o melhor. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar o exercício resistido e jogging (JOGG) na doença cardiovascular múltipla (DCV), nos fatores de risco metabólicos e aptidão física de mulheres obesas ou com sobrepeso [composição corporal, perfil lipídico, acido úrico, glicose, equivalente metabólico (MET), frequência cardíaca, pressão arterial, flexibilidade, gasto de energia em repouso (GER) e balanço de nitrogênio (BN)]. MÉTODOS: Cinquenta mulheres foram aleatoriamente divididas em dois grupos, mas apenas 26 terminaram o estudo: exercício resistido (ER) (n=14; 36±12 anos; índice de massa corporal, IMC=32±7 kg/m²) e JOGG (n=12; 37±9 anos; IMC=29±2). O primeiro mês de treinamento consistiu em 60 min x 03 dias/semana e o segundo mês de treinamento consistiu em 04 dias/semana para ambos os protocolos, mais reeducação alimentar. RESULTADOS: Ambos os grupos apresentaram diminuição da massa corporal total, IMC, acido úrico plasmático e aumento do MET (p<0,05); não houve alteração na massa corporal magra, GER, e frequência cardíaca de repouso. O treinamento com ER reduziu o colesterol total, triglicérides plasmáticos, BN e aumentou a flexibilidade; o treinamento com JOGG reduziu a razão cintura/quadril, níveis de glicose, pressão arterial sistólica, lipoproteína de alta densidade e aumentou a razão colesterol total/ lipoproteína de alta densidade (p<0,05). CONCLUSÃO: Ambos os protocolos melhoram a DCV e os fatores de risco metabólicos. Os ER apresentaram mudanças favoráveis no perfil lipídico e na flexibilidade, enquanto o JOGG apresentou mudanças favoráveis sobre a glicose, razão cintura/quadril e pressão arterial. Esses resultados sugerem que treinamento de pesos em circuito combinados com exercícios aeróbicos devem ser considerados para indivíduos obesos. Entretanto, em relação à algumas diferenças entre os grupos na avaliação basal, não é possível concluir que as alterações sejam devidas ao tipo de exercício ouà variabilidade intra-grupo.
Sobrepeso; ácido úrico; aptidão física; metabolismo energético
FUNDAMENTO: Ejercicios resistidos y aeróbicos se recomiendan para reducir el peso y mejorar la salud, pero todavía no se definió cuál de los dos tipos es el mejor. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar el ejercicio resistido y el jogging (JOGG) en la enfermedad cardiovascular múltiple (ECV), en los factores de riesgo metabólicos y la aptitud física de mujeres obesas o con sobrepeso [composición corporal, perfil lipídico, ácido úrico, glucosa, equivalente metabólico (MET), frecuencia cardiaca, presión arterial, flexibilidad, gasto de energía en reposo (GER) y balance de nitrógeno (BN)]. MÉTODOS: Cincuenta mujeres se dividieron en dos grupos, de modo aleatorio, pero solamente 26 terminaron el estudio: ejercicio resistido (ER) (n=14; 36±12 anos; índice de masa corporal, IMC=32±7 kg/m²) y JOGG (n=12; 37±9 años; IMC=29±2). El primer mes de entrenamiento consistió en 60 min x 03 días/semana y el segundo mes de entrenamiento consistió en 04 días/semana para ambos protocolos, pero reeducación alimentaria. RESULTADOS: Ambos grupos presentaron disminución de la masa corporal total, IMC, ácido úrico plasmático y aumento del MET (p<0,05); no hubo alteración en la masa corporal magra, GER, y frecuencia cardiaca de reposo. El entrenamiento con ER redujo el colesterol total, triglicéridos plasmáticos, BN y aumentó la flexibilidad; el entrenamiento con JOGG redujo a la razón cintura/cadera, los niveles de glucosa, la presión arterial sistólica, la lipoproteína de alta densidad y aumentó la razón colesterol total/ lipoproteína de alta densidad (p<0,05). CONCLUSIÓN: Ambos protocolos mejoraron la ECV y los factores de riesgo metabólicos. Los ER presentaron cambios favorables en el perfil lipídico y en la flexibilidad, mientras que el JOGG presentó cambios favorables sobre la glucosa, razón cintura/cadera y presión arterial. Estos resultados sugieren que entrenamiento de pesos en circuito combinados con ejercicios aeróbicos se deben considerar para individuos obesos. Sin embargo, con relación a algunas diferencias entre los grupos en la evaluación basal, no es posible concluir que las alteraciones se deban al tipo de ejercicio o a la variabilidad intragrupo.
Sobrepeso; ácido úrico; aptitud física; metabolismo energético
BACKGROUND: Resisted and aerobic exercises are recommended to reduce weight and improve health, but which exercise modality offers the best results is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to compare circuit weight training (CWT) with jogging (JOGG) on multiple cardiovascular disease (CVD), metabolic risk factors and fitness of overweight and obese women (body composition, lipid profile, uric acid, glucose, metabolic equivalent (MET), heart rate, blood pressure, flexibility, resting energy expenditure (REE) and nitrogen balance (NB)). METHODS: Fifty women were randomly divided in two groups, but only 26 finished it: CWT (n=14; 36±12 years old; body mass index, BMI=32±7 kg/m²) and JOGG (n=12; 37±9; BMI=29±2). The first month of training consisted of 60 min x 03 days/week and the second month of training consisted of 04 days/week for both protocols and a dietary reeducation. RESULTS: Both groups reduced total body mass, fat body mass, BMI, plasma uric acid and increase in MET (p<0.05); there was no change in lean body mass, REE and resting heart rate. CWT reduced total cholesterol, plasma triglycerides, NB and increased flexibility; JOGG reduced waist/hip ratio, glucose, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and increased the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Both protocols improved CVD and metabolic risk factors. The CWT presented favorable changes regarding lipid profile and flexibility; JOGG on glucose, waist/hip ratio and blood pressure. These results suggest that resisted exercise combined with aerobics should be considered for obese people. Nevertheless, regarding some basal differences between the groups , it was not possible to conclude that changes were due to exercise type or intra-group variability.
Overweight; obesity; uric acid; physical fitness; energy metabolism
Circuit weight training vs jogging in metabolic risk factors of overweight/obese women
Carlos Alexandre FettI; Waléria Christiane Rezende FettI; Julio Sérgio MarchiniII
ILaboratório de Aptidão Física e Metabolismo da Faculdade de Educação Física da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso. Cuiabá. MT
IILaboratório de Espectrometria de Massa. Departamento de Clínica Médica da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto. SP - Brazil
BACKGROUND: Resisted and aerobic exercises are recommended to reduce weight and improve health, but which exercise modality offers the best results is still unclear.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to compare circuit weight training (CWT) with jogging (JOGG) on multiple cardiovascular disease (CVD), metabolic risk factors and fitness of overweight and obese women (body composition, lipid profile, uric acid, glucose, metabolic equivalent (MET), heart rate, blood pressure, flexibility, resting energy expenditure (REE) and nitrogen balance (NB)).
METHODS: Fifty women were randomly divided in two groups, but only 26 finished it: CWT (n=14; 36±12 years old; body mass index, BMI=32±7 kg/m2) and JOGG (n=12; 37±9; BMI=29±2). The first month of training consisted of 60 min x 03 days/week and the second month of training consisted of 04 days/week for both protocols and a dietary reeducation.
RESULTS: Both groups reduced total body mass, fat body mass, BMI, plasma uric acid and increase in MET (p<0.05); there was no change in lean body mass, REE and resting heart rate. CWT reduced total cholesterol, plasma triglycerides, NB and increased flexibility; JOGG reduced waist/hip ratio, glucose, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and increased the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both protocols improved CVD and metabolic risk factors. The CWT presented favorable changes regarding lipid profile and flexibility; JOGG on glucose, waist/hip ratio and blood pressure. These results suggest that resisted exercise combined with aerobics should be considered for obese people. Nevertheless, regarding some basal differences between the groups , it was not possible to conclude that changes were due to exercise type or intra-group variability.
Key words: Overweight; obesity; uric acid; physical fitness; energy metabolism.
Obese individuals present an impaired lipid profile, increased plasma uric acid, a higher incidence of diabetes type 2, risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic diseases in general1,2. Moreover, the waist/hip ratio (WHR) and body mass index (BMI; m/kg2), are positively correlated with dyslipidemia and CVD1,2, negatively correlated with endothelial function3 and with a low physical fitness and effort tolerance, which are associated with an increased risk of death1,4.
Around one third of the American population is currently trying to lose weight, but not all people who would benefit from weight loss are making an attempt at it5. Despite an increased investment in weight reduction programs, these efforts have been unable to prevent the increase in overweight and obesity6. In addition, 33.5% of the individuals regain the lost weight over a one-year period7, and up to 90 to 95% gain it back later1. One reason that contributes to this is that diets to reduce weight are associated with a reduction in resting energy expenditure (REE, kcal/day)1 as well as in lean body mass (LBM), which is positively associated with REE8.
On the other hand, increased physical activity also favors a better weight maintenance9, and weight regain is two times higher in those with sedentary life styles7. Regular physical activity reduces abdominal fat, the mortality risk5, even over the caloric intake10 and additionally, weight loss is associated with the reduction in metabolic risk factors2,11. However, the increase in domestic physical activity is not associated with a reduction in obesity and other CVD risk factors12.
Jogging is a low- to medium-intensity type of aerobic training, habitually used for weight control13. CWT involves mixed metabolic characteristics and produces good results regarding body fat reduction, physical fitness and functional capacity improvement14-17, but it is still not clear which of the two types of training is more efficient.
Thus, the main purposes were to determine the influence of each exercise over:
1) body composition;
2) lipid profile, uric acid and glucose levels (mg/dL);
3) REE and nitrogen balance (NB; g/d);
4) physical fitness; and,
5) the qualitative and quantitative diet profile before and after the interventions.
The volunteers were invited to participate in the study through fliers containing the body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) formula, distributed at University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil. At the first meeting, the women filled out an information sheet with name, weight and height, which was used by the staff to randomly divide them in two groups, respectively submitted to circuit weight training (CWT, n=25) or jogging (JOGG, n= 25). The subjects were initially evaluated (time 1, T1 or baseline), submitted to training and to a low-calorie diet for eight weeks, the time needed for program adaptation17,18, and then re-evaluated at the end of the study (time 2, T2) (Table 1).
The same physician from the staff of the University Hospital of the School of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of São Paulo (UHFMRPUSP) examined all the women. The blood pressure and RHR were measured at this time. Inclusion criteria were: a BMI >25 kg/m2, no history of chronic metabolic diseases in addition to obesity itself, no smoking, no alcoholism (>15 g ethanol equivalents/day), no use of medications such as beta blockers or sympathomimetic drugs, no orthopedic limitations and a sedentary life style. All women were informed about the procedures of the study and signed a free and informed consent form approved by the Research Ethics Committee of UHFMRPUSP(process HCRP # 5317/2002).
Total body mass (kg) and height (cm) were measured with a Filizola® electronic scale ID1500 (São Paulo: SP, Brazil) with a precision of 0.1 kg and 0.5 cm, respectively. Skin folds (triceps, suprailiac and thigh) were assessed for body composition19,20 using a Lange® caliper (Beta Technology INC, Santa Cruz: CA, USA) with a constant pressure of 10 g/mm2 on the contact surface and a precision of 0.1 mm, with a 0-65 mm scale. The WHR was obtained by dividing the circumference of the abdomen at the height of the umbilicus by that of the hips at their largest perimeter, in cm. A Quantum® BIA-101Q, Serial n Q 1559, RJL Systems, Inc, apparatus (RJL Systems, Clinton: MI, USA) was used for bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA), at a frequency of 50 kHz. The body composition was calculated by the formula of Segal et al.21.
Triglycerides (Tg), total cholesterol (TC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) were estimated in the Nutrition Laboratory. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) was calculated:
LDL=TC - HDL - Tg/5
Uric acid was estimated by the uricase method and glucose levels by hexokinase-glucose-6-phosphate in the Central Laboratory all of UHFMRPUSP (mg/dL to all).
Indirect calorimetry was measured for 30 minutes after 12-hour fasting, with the patient lying down in absolute rest, also avoiding conversation and sleep (Vmax 29® Sensor Medics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA). The dietary reeducation was based on the calculation of a calorie supply similar to REE for both groups, ranging from 1100 kcal/d (4605 kJ/d) to 1700 kcal/d (7117 kJ/d), and the following proportion of macronutrients:20% of fat; 20% of protein; 60% of carbohydrate22. The habitual ingestion was obtained by means of a one-week dietary record performed before (T1) and after (T2) the interventions23. The subjects were instructed to follow these guidelines in their homes and to have a weekly meeting with the staff (two physical educators, one nutritionist and one physician).
To measure the nitrogen balance (NB, g/day),the first morning urine was discarded and all the urine excreted thereafter was collected up to the first urine of the subsequent morning. The NB was estimated by subtracting excreted nitrogen from total ingested nitrogen (each gram of nitrogen represents 6.25 g of ingested protein from food record). The additional nitrogen loss in the stool was estimated with the addition of 2 g/d24.
The metabolic equivalent (MET; 3.5 ml O2.kg-1.min-1), was assessed on an electric treadmill (model E17A®, Del Mar Reynolds Medical, Inc. Irvine: CA, USA) using the Ergo PC13®program of Micromed, the ECG digital Micromed program (Micromed Biotecnologia Ltda, Guara II, Brasilia: DF, Brazil) and the Bruce protocol, provided by the Service of Cardiology of UHFMRPUSP. The flexibility was accessed through the seat and reach test, of which the result was the maximal distance achieved in cm19.
Training intensity was adjusted according to 70 to 80% of the Karvonen heart rate reserve (HRR) calculated through the following equation:
HRR = ((HR max - HR basal) x 0.7 ou 0.8) + HR basal
and by the modified Borg scale (between three and five; moderate to strong)18,19. Training consisted of 1 h per session (45 min of activity and 15 min divided between warming-up and cooling-down), with three sessions per week during the first month (180 min/week), and 4 sessions during the second month (240 min/week) for both groups.
CWT consisted of 15 stations of resisted exercises for all the main muscle groups with a thirty-second duration (10 to 20 repetitions per exercise) alternated with 30 seconds of walking or jogging. The maximum number of repetitions, which increased with conditioning, was performed to maintain the intensity that each subject was able to reach in the above range. The stations were arranged in a circle in a 10 x 15 m room with tatami pads on the floor. The jogging training took place on an athletic track with the subject performing the exercise continuously for 45 min at the programmed intensity.
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to analyze data for normality of distribution and the paired Student t-test was used for the comparison of the two times (T1 vs. T2) in each group. Comparison between groups at baseline (CWT T1 vs. JOGG T1), and for variations (delta, Δ=T2-T1), was performed by the unpaired Student t-test. Data are reported as mean±SD and the statistical analyses were carried out at the 5% level of significance, with the determination of the 95% confidence interval. The power of test was estimated as γ (θ) = 0.915 (91.5%), considering the variation of two units of BMI and a number of participants equal 10.
One-hundred-and-twenty women contacted us; of the selected 72, 50 started the program and 26 completed it (CWT, n=14; JOGG, n=12). The age of the volunteers was 36±12 years old for the CWT and 37±9 for the JOGG groups. The other characteristics are presented in Table 1. The reasons for the 24 dropout cases were: little adherence to protocols (n=10; 06 in CWT and 04 in JOGG group), difficulties with the training schedule due to work or family reasons (n=6; 03 in CWT and 03 in JOGG group), family disease (n=1; in JOGG group), a fall (n=1; in JOGG group), and depression and/or anxiety (n=6; 02 in CWT and 04 in JOGG group).
Total body mass, BMI, body fat percentage from anthropometry, body fat percentage by BIA and body fat were significantly reduced in both groups; WHR was significantly reduced in JOGG and lean mass showed no statistically significant difference in either group as well as no delta differences (Table 1).
Uric acid was significantly reduced in both groups; CWT also presented a significantly reduction in TC and Tg and JOGG presented a decrease in glucose and HDL levels and an increase in the TC/HDL ratio. LDL and TC/HDL deltas where significantly reduced in the CWT compared to JOGG group (Table 2).
The REE decreased slightly in both groups, but there was no statistical difference (CWT: T1=1600±240 (kcal/d), T2=1450±270; JOGG: T1=1510±160, T2=1400±160). The NB decreased significantly in the CWT, remained the same in the JOGG and was positive in both groups (Figure 1). Diet evaluation regarding macronutrients was: T1=31% fat, 16% protein and 53% carbohydrate; T2=24% fat, 19% protein and 57% carbohydrate for both groups.
Both groups significantly increased the MET and total time of treadmill maximal test. The CWT increased flexibility and JOGG reduced systolic blood pressure (p<0.05), but no changes in RHR were observed in either group. The flexibility delta was significantly higher in the CWT group (Table 3).
In spite of some baseline differences between the groups, the initial mean BMI, which was the criterion for inclusion in the study, was considered to be statistically equal. This was due to the fact that two groups cannot be accurately paired in random experiments. However, we would like to point out that our objective was to perform a global analysis of the groups. To minimize the initial variation of some variables, we also analyzed the changes occurring between deltas of each group.
The present study observed improvement in body composition, biochemical parameters, physical conditioning, and maintenance of REE, LBM and NB in both groups, similar to what was observed in others studies of the same nature, in which CWT or JOGG training was used13,15. Longer studies (12 weeks) with a slightly less caloric diet or with the same duration and very low-calorie intake had similar results regarding body composition and biochemical parameters25. However, regarding CWT, other studies observed that this type of training resulted in marked improvement in physical conditioning26-28, cardiorespiratory endurance15 and a modest improvement26, or no change27,28 in body composition. Compared to these studies, the present study observed better improvement in body composition in the CWT group. When comparing CWT and JOGG, Gettman et al.29, similarly to the present study, did not find differences in body composition or VO2 max between these two types of exercise. These results show that the issue is not unanimous in literature.
Another important aspect for obese people is the association of diet reeducation with physical activity30. It has been demonstrated that a moderate reduction in total calorie intake, as proposed in the present study, causes better subject compliance than programs involving a very low calorie diet6. The patients were advised to choose whole carbohydrates with higher fiber content and lean protein. In the present study, the diet had an increased carbohydrate and protein content and a reduced fat content. This qualitative approach should have had a positive impact on body fat reduction6.
The CWT or JOOG protocols were according to the recommendations of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) for obese individuals6. However, Beckham and Earnest31 showed that a training stimulus significantly below (< 32% VO2 max) ACSM recommendations (50% VO2 max) in a CWT protocol, significantly increased the VO2 max result, but that HR should not be used to assess exercise intensity in these exercise modalities. To solve this problem, we also used the Borg Scale in combination with HRR, which show good association19. In spite of some difference in variables between the groups, both showed improvement in MET and total time of treadmill maximal test, suggesting equivalence in terms of training intensity and health improvement. The VO2 max alone has a predictive value of all causes of mortality equivalent to that of diabetes, hypertension, high levels of cholesterol and smoking4. MET is equivalent to VO2 max and is used to estimate the intensity level of the physical activity6. Although the HR reduction is expected with the cardiovascular improvement18, this was not observed here. Although this is difficult to explain, these findings are in agreement with other long-term studies18.
The flexibility was improved only in the CWT group. We speculate that the full range of motion of resisted exercise applied in present study may have contributed to this fact, as both groups followed the same stretching protocol in the start and the end of sessions. The flexibility is an important factor to facilitate activities of daily living and that is reduced with age and impaired in obese people. The poor flexibility and fitness level was associated with an increase in body fat percentage and back pain in nurses32. Regarding this physical valence, the CWT group showed better result for general fitness conditioning and daily activities.
The WHR was significantly reduced in the JOGG, but not in CWT group. It was expected that weight reduction would proportionally reduce the general measurements, maintaining the WHR value33. However, in a study performed by Wabitsch et al.34, young women with abdominal obesity had a greater reduction in WHR, weight, TC and uric acid than women with gluteus obesity. This may have been due to the fact that the levels of the variables analyzed were higher in women with abdominal obesity, favoring a greater loss. In another study, women with abdominal obesity were found to oxidize more fat during physical activity than women with gluteus obesity, favoring a reduction in WHR35. Therefore, differences in fat distribution between the groups may explain the results of these studies34,35. However, in the present study, the CWT group had a greater mean WHR value than the JOGG group, a fact that does not support this reasoning.
Girandola36, showed that when a high-intensity protocol and a low-intensity protocol with other exercises were applied, only the low-intensity protocol improved body composition. In this regard, the present data support a different conclusion, because the duration and intensity of the two protocols were similar, but the metabolic energy involved was different, with the JOGG predominantly utilizing aerobic and CWT group using mixed aerobic/anaerobic energy resources. One explanation is that exercises for lean body mass development37, such as in the CWT, and increase dietary protein intake38, as the one utilized in the present dietary protocol, would favor REE and consequently fat oxidation, justifying the CWT results. But, in the present study, REE was maintained in both groups and the NB remained positive during the intervention time, facts that could have contributed to body fat reduction in both groups. Probably, by different metabolic pathways, both groups efficiently increased fat oxidation and maintained REE, despite the differences between the groups regarding body composition.
Harber et al.27 demonstrated that the CWT promotes an increase in the cross-sectional area of type IIA fibers and tends to increase lean mass in sedentary men in only 10 weeks. The lean mass is correlated with REE37 and, in a previous study8, we observed that in obese women, when expressed as kg units, the lean mass presents the best correlation with REE, when compared to total weight, fat mass and BMI. These facts should contribute to the action of CWT in reducing fat and improving lipid profile. However, the JOGG protocol was sufficiently intense to maintain the lean body mass, contributing to the absence of REE decrease, a common fact observed in weight-loss protocols1. Furthermore, the training associated with dieting in both groups was sufficient to promote the positive nitrogen balance, which suggests enough energy and protein to support the protein synthesis, contributing to REE maintainence38.
The changes observed in the lipid profile in the present study may have been influenced by the type of exercise and to a difference between groups in T1. The total cholesterol was significantly higher, and the difference in levels of triglycerides did not have statistical difference, but they were biologically higher in CWT, which could have contributed to higher reduction in this group. However, studies demonstrated that a weight reduction in 10% is associated with an improvement in metabolic risk factors2,11, as observed here. Yet, one study with type-2 diabetes subjects reported that CWT promoted a significant reduction in total cholesterol, LDL and triglycerides39. In the present study, the reductions were just 6% in the CWT and 7% in JOGG group, when compared to the initial weight. It was demonstrated that the exercises are more often associated with CVD risk prevention than caloric intake10. Furthermore, the type of exercise could differently impact risk factors to CVD, but this was not observed in this study, may be regarding to differences between groups in basal, but which was not conclusive in the present study due to the differences in biochemical variables in T1.
On the other hand, differently from the present study, Nieman et al.40, observed that reductions in TC and Tg were effectively associated with weight loss in obese women, but not with the exercise. However, Lee et al.9, reported that physical activity was more important than the reduction in abdominal obesity regarding the risk of metabolic alterations. In addition, physical activity reduces intra-abdominal fat even without weight reduction14, and the increase in the number of days of domestic physical activity do not appear to be associated with the prevention of the majority of CVD risk factors in men and women12, supporting the idea that continuity and intensity of physical activity are determinants for that prevention, even more than the diet reeducation10. In this regard, both protocols reduced variables associated with CVD risk factors.
Basal glucose, diastolic blood pressure and uric acid were all reduced in the JOGG group and just uric acid in the CWT group. The weight reduction and physical activity are associated with this behavior1,2,4,6. These results suggest that the continuous, more than intermittent activity, had the strongest impact over blood pressure and glucose, but the importance of these factors are reduced here because these were normal values at the start of the study in both groups. Although hypertension is associated with obesity, as in the present study, others observed normal blood pressure in lean, overweight and obese eumenorrheic middle-aged women3.
In summary, a combination of dietary calorie and fat reduction with regular physical exercise improved the general aspects of health and reduced metabolic risk factors in these obese women. The CWT group presented better results regarding lipid profile and flexibility and the JOGG group regarding glucose and diastolic blood pressure. However, these differences could not be attributed to the type of exercise alone, but also to the intra-group effect too, as the high number of dropouts limited the final numbers of participants and the groups had an important difference between the BMI and biochemistry variables in T1. However, even without a marked weight reduction, the changes promoted by the protocols improved the CVD and metabolic risk factors9, suggesting that they are a good approach for obese patients that do not meet these criteria with the accumulation of domestic physical activity12, and many of those trying to lose weight do not use effective strategies5.
These results suggest that a combination of resisted and aerobic physical exercises is well tolerated and could present better results than aerobics alone for obese individuals, but that does not solve the problem of the low adherence to behavioral reeducation programs. Future investigations with a larger number of participants and the same dependent variables at the start of the study should help elucidate the conflicting results. Increased efforts are needed among all those trying to lose weight to promote effective strategies for weight loss, including the use of calorie reduction and increased levels of physical activity5.
Acknowledgements to Sandra R Oyama, Estela I Rabito, Andréa FS Tannus, Carla BN Borges, Abel E Rahal, Romualdo Vichnevski, Ângelo Bataglion Neto, João G Padovan, for technical support. CAF would like to thank CAPES for a doctoral fellowship.
Potential Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Sources of Funding
This study was funded by Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo and CAPES.
This article is part of the thesis of doctoral submitted by Carlos Alexandre Fett, Waléria Christiane Rezende Fett, Julio Sérgio Marchini, from Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso.
- 1. Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Hirsch J. Obesity. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337 (6): 396-407.
- 2. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Thrid Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of Gihh Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285 (19): 2486-97.
- 3. Olson TP, Schmitz KH, Leon AS, Dengel DR. Vascular structure and function in women relationship with body mass index. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30 (6): 487-92.
- 4. Wei M, Kampet J, Barlow CE, Nichaman MZ, Gibbons LW, Paffenbarger RS, et al. Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men. JAMA. 1999; 27 (16): 1547-53.
- 5. Kruger J, Galuska DA, Serdula MK, Jones DA. Attempting to lose weight: specific practices among U.S. Adults. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 26 (5): 402-6.
- 6. Jakicic JM, Clark K, Coleman E, Donnelly JE, Foreyt J, Melanson E, et al. Appropriate intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention for weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33 (12): 2145-56.
- 7. Weiss EC, Galuska DA, Khan LK, Gillespie C, Serdula MD. Weight regain in U.S. adults who experienced substantial weight loss, 19992002. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33 (1): 34-40.
- 8. Fett CA, Fett WCR, Marchini JS. Resting energy expenditure measured vs estimated and this relationship with body composition in women. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006; 50 (6): 1050-8.
- 9. Lee CD, Blair SN, Jackson AS. Cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69 (3): 373-80.
- 10. Fang J, Wylie-Rosett J, Cohen HW, Kaplan RC, Alderman MH. Exercise, body mass index, caloric intake, and cardiovascular mortality. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 25 (4): 283-9.
- 11. Maffiuletti NA, Agosti F, Marinone PG, Silvestri G, Lafortuna CL, Sartorio A. Changes in body composition, physical performance and cardiovascular risk factors after a 3-week integrated body weight reduction program and after 1-y follow-up in severely obese men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59 (5): 685-94.
- 12. Stamatakis E, Hillsdon M, Primatesta P. Domestic physical activity in relationship to multiple CVD risk factors. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32 (4): 320-7.
- 13. Molé PA, Stern JS, Schultz CL, Bernauer EM, Holcomb BJ. Exercise reverses depressed metabolic rate produced by severe caloric restriction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989; 21 (1): 29-33.
- 14. Ross R, Dagnone D, Jones PJ, Smith H, Paddags A, Hudson R, et al. Reduction in obesity and related co-morbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133 (2): 92-103.
- 15. Maiorana A, O´Driscoll G, Dembo L, Goodman C, Taylor R, Green D. Exercise training, vascular function, and functional capacity in middle-aged subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33 (12): 2022-8.
- 16. Gettman LR, Ward P, Hagan RD. A comparison of combined running and weight training with weight training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14 (3): 229-34.
- 17. Watts K, Beye P, Siafarikas A, Davis EA, Jones TW, O'Driscoll G, et al. Exercise training normalizes vascular dysfunction and improves central adiposity in obese adolescents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43 (10): 1823-7.
- 18. Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Cardiovascular control during exercise. In: Gilly H, Rhoda J (eds). Physiology of sport and exercise. 2nd ed. Champaign, (IL): Human Kinetics; 1999. p. 222-33.
- 19. Pollock ML, Wilmore JH, Fox III SM. Exercícios na saúde e na doença: avaliação e prescrição para prevenção e reabilitação. Rio de Janeiro, (RJ): Editora MEDSI; 1986. p. 39, 61, 229, 235-40.
- 20. Siri WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and density. In: Brozek J, Henschel A (eds): Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington, (DC): NAS; 1961. p. 223-44.
- 21. Segal KR, Van Loan M, Fitzgerald PI, Hodgdon JA, Van Itallie TB. Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analyses: a four-site cross-validation study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988; 47 (1): 7-14.
- 22. Weir JB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 1949; 109 (1-2): 1-9.
23U.S. Department of agriculture. Nutrient database for standard reference. Composition of foods. Raw, processed, prepared. Agricultural Research Service. Batesville Human Nutrition Research Center. Beltsville, (Maryland), 2002.
- 24. Munro HN, Fleck A. Analysis of tissues and body fluids for nitrogenous constituents. In: Munro HN (ed): Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press; 1969.
- 25. Pavlou NK, Krey S, Steffee WP. Exercise as adjunct to weight loss and maintenance in moderately obese subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989; 49 (5 Suppl): 1115-23.
- 26. Harris KA, Holly RG. Physiological response to circuit weight training in borderline hypertensive subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987; 19 (3): 246-52.
- 27. Harber MP, Fry AC, Rubin MR, Smith JC, Weiss LW. Skeletal muscle and hormonal adaptations to circuit weight training in untrained men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004; 14 (3): 176-85.
- 28. Wilmore JH, Parr RB, Girandola RN, Ward P, Vodak PA, Barstow TJ, et al. Physiological alterations consequent to circuit weight training. Med Sci Sports. 1978; 10 (2): 79-84.
- 29. Gettman LR, Ayres JJ, Pollock ML, Durstine JL, Grantham W. Physiologic effect on adult men of circuit strength and jogging. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979; 60 (3): 115-20.
- 30. Fett C, Fett W, Fabbro A, Marchini J. Dietary re-education, exercise program, performance and body indexes associated with risk factors in overweight/obese women. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2005; 2 (2): 45-53.
- 31. Beckham SG, Earnest CP. Metabolic cost of free weight circuit weight training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2000; 40 (2): 118-25.
- 32. Naidoo R, Coopoo Y. The health and fitness profiles of nurses in KwaZulu-Natal. Curationis. 2007; 30 (2): 66-73.
- 33. Pare A, Dumont M, Lemieux I, Brochu M, Alméras N, Lemieux S, et al. Is the relationship between adipose tissue and waist girth altered by weight loss in obese men? Obes Res. 2001; 9 (9): 526-34.
- 34. Wabitsch M, Hauner H, Heinze E, Muche R, Böckmann A, Parthon W, et al. Body-fat distribution and changes in the atherogenic risk-factor profile in obese adolescent girls during weight reduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994; 60 (1): 54-60.
- 35. van Aggel-Leijssen DP, Saris WH, Wagenmakers AJ, Hul GB, van Baak MA. The effect or low-intensity exercise training on fat metabolism of obese women. Obes Res. 2001; 9 (2): 86-96.
- 36. Girandola RN. Body composition changes in women: effects of high and low intensity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1976; 57 (6): 297-300.
- 37. Melby C, Scholl C, Edwardsm G, Bullough R. Effect of acute resistance exercise on postexercise energy expenditure and resting metabolic rate. J Appl Physiol. 1993; 75 (4): 1847-53.
- 38. Wolfe RR. Protein supplements and exercises. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 72 (2 Suppl): 551S-7S.
- 39. Honkola A, Forsen T, Eriksson J. Resistance training improves the metabolic profile in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 1997; 34 (4): 245-8.
- 40. Nieman DC, Brock DW, Butterworth D, Utter AC, Nieman CC. Reducing diet and/or exercise training decreases the lipid and lipoprotein risk factors of moderately obese women. J Am Coll Nutr. 2002; 21 (4): 344-50.
Correspondência:Carlos Alexandre FettAv. Fernando Correa da Costa, CampusFaculdade de Educação Física, Ginásio de Esportes, SecretariaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso78.060-900, Cuiabá, MT - BrasilE-mail:
Publication in this collection
11 Jan 2010
Date of issue
08 July 2008
18 June 2008
21 Apr 2008