Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

C-reactive Protein as a Prognostic Marker of 1-Year Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Aortic Stenosis

Abstract

Background:

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammation biomarker that can be a predictor of adverse events in cardiovascular procedures. Its use in the assessment of long-term prognosis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still incipient.

Objective:

To evaluate CRP as a prognostic marker in the first year after TAVI in aortic stenosis (AoS).

Methods:

CRP was assessed on the first postoperative week in a retrospective cohort of patients with AoS. Pre- and post- CRP levels were correlated with mortality, and predictors of 1-year mortality were investigated. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify independent factors of 1-year mortality.

Results:

This study evaluated 130 patients who underwent TAVI, with median age of 83 years, and 49% of women. High pre-TAVI CRP (> 0.5 mg/dL) was observed in 34.5% of the cases. Peak CRP was 7.0 (5.3-12.1) mg/dL no quarto dia. The rate of 1-year mortality was 14.5% (n = 19), being greater in the groups with high pre-TAVI CRP (68.8% vs 29.1%; p = 0,004) and with peak CRP ≥ 10.0 mg/dL (64.7% vs 30.8%; p = 0,009). Independent predictors of mortality were acute renal failure (ARF) (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.43; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 2.1-24.7; p = 0,001), high pre-TAVI CRP (HR 4.15; 95%CI, 1.3-12.9; p = 0.01), and large blood transfusion [HR 4,68; 1,3-16,7; p = 0.02].

Conclusions:

High pre-TAVI CRP showed to be an independent predictor of 1-year mortality, as well as the presence of ARF and large blood transfusions.

Keywords:
C-Reactive Protein; Inflammation; Bomarkers; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Aortic Valve Stenosis

Resumo

Fundamento:

A proteína C-reativa (PCR) é um biomarcador de inflamação preditor de eventos adversos em procedimentos cardiovasculares. Na avaliação do implante da válvula aórtica transcateter (transcatheter aortic valve implantation, TAVI) em relação ao prognóstico de longo prazo ainda é incipiente.

Objetivo:

Avaliar a PCR como marcador prognóstico no primeiro ano pós-TAVI na estenose aórtica (EAo).

Métodos:

A PCR foi avaliada na primeira semana do peroperatório numa coorte de casos retrospectiva com EAo. Correlacionou-se a PCR pré- e pós-TAVI com a mortalidade e foram pesquisados fatores preditores de mortalidade em 1 ano. Realizada regressão de Cox multivariada para identificar os preditores independentes de óbito em 1 ano.

Resultados:

Estudados 130 pacientes submetidos a TAVI, com mediana de idade de 83 anos, sendo 49% deles do sexo feminino. A PCR pré-TAVI elevada (> 0,5 mg/dL) ocorreu em 34,5% dos casos. O pico de PCR foi 7,0 (5,3-12,1) mg/dL no quarto dia. A mortalidade em 1 ano foi 14,5% (n = 19), sendo maior nos grupos com PCR pré-TAVI elevada (68,8% vs 29,1%; p = 0,004) e pico de PCR ≥ 10,0 mg/dL (64,7% vs 30,8%; p = 0,009). Os fatores preditores independentes de mortalidade foram insuficiência renal aguda (IRA) [razão de risco (RR) = 7,43; intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC95%), 2,1-24,7; p = 0,001], PCR pré-TAVI elevada [RR = 4,15; IC95%, 1,3-12,9; p=0,01] e hemotransfusão volumosa [HR = 4,68; 1,3-16,7; p = 0,02].

Conclusões:

A PCR pré-TAVI elevada mostrou-se fator preditor independente de mortalidade no primeiro ano, assim como a ocorrência de IRA e hemotransfusões volumosas.

Palavras-chave:
Proteina C- Reativa; Inflamação; Biomarcadores; Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca; Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter; Prognóstico; Estenose Aórtica

Introduction

Fibrocalcic aortic stenosis (AoS) is a degenerative disease whose number of cases is estimated to triplicate in Brazil in the next 20 years, due to population aging.11 Brasil. Presidência da República. Secretaria de Direitos Humanos. Secretaria Nacional de Promoção Defesa dos Direitos Humanos. [Internet]. Dados sobre o envelhecimento no Brasil. [acesso em 2016 set. 21]. Disponível em:<http://www.sdh.gov.br/assuntos/pessoa-idosa/dados-estatisticos/DadossobreoenvelhecimentonoBrasil.pdf>
http://www.sdh.gov.br/assuntos/pessoa-id...

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment that has been increasingly used in older adults, a group affected by chronic low-grade systemic inflammation (inflammaging),22 Franceschi C, Campisi J. Chronic inflammation (inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S4-9. whose presence is associated with greater: (1) organ dysfunction and frailty; (2) immune system compromise and risk of infections; and (3) rate of cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality.33 Wu IC, Lin CC, Hsiung CA. Emerging roles of frailty and inflammaging in risk assessment of age-related chronic diseases in older adults: the intersection between aging biology and personalized medicine. Biomedicine (Taipei). 2015;5(1):1. This systemic inflammation is compounded by aortic valve inflammation in the process of valve degeneration from the initial stage of lipid infiltration44 Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach D, Gown A, O’Brien KD. Characterization of the early lesion of ‘degenerative’ valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation. 1994;90(2):844-53. to the end-stage of calcification and neovascularization of leaflets.55 Mazzone A, Epistolato MC, De Caterina R, Storti S, Vittorini S, Sbrana S, et al. Neoangiogenesis, T-lymphocyte infiltration, and heat shock protein-60 are biological hallmarks of an immunomediated inflammatory process in end-stagecalcified aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(9):1670-6. Therefore, both systemic and valve inflammations are present before TAVI and have an increase, at different levels, after the procedure, depending on the adopted techniques and strategies.

However, few studies have used biomarkers to assess the role of systemic inflammation in mid- and long-term prognosis after TAVI. The present study evaluated the extent of systemic inflammation before and over 1 week after TAVI through serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and correlated them with 1-year prognosis.

Methods

Population

This is a retrospective, cohort, observational study of symptomatic patients with severe AoS who underwent TAVI at a private hospital from June 2009 to May 2015. During this period, 137 TAVIs were performed on native valves, of which the following were excluded from the present study: four cases of mechanical complications during the procedure resulting in death within 24 hours, and three procedures performed in critically-ill patients. We investigated 130 patients with severe AoS and symptoms of heart failure (HF), angina, or syncope who underwent TAVI with: (1) native aortic valve on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), with the presence of at least one of the following criteria: mean aortic transvalvular gradient > 40 mm Hg, or aortic jet velocity > 4 m/s, or aortic valve area (AVA) < 1 cm2 (or AVA indexed by body surface < 0.6 cm2/m2);66 Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(15):1438-54. (2) high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as defined by the cardiologic team; (3) viable vascular access: transfemoral (TF), trans subclavian (TSC), and transaortic.

This study was conducted in compliance with the principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki and reviewed in 2000 (Scotland 2000) and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Pró-Cardíaco under no. 423. All patients signed an Informed Consent Form.

Investigation procedures

This study evaluated demographic variables and intervention and post-intervention variables correlated with clinical and laboratory parameters involved in inflammatory response after TAVI.

Laboratory tests included complete blood count, creatinine, and CRP. Convenience samples were sent to a clinical analysis laboratory, and results were immediately made available. Serum high-sensitive CRP concentrations were measured by turbidimetric immunoassay according to the hospital laboratory routine (reference value < 0.5 mg/dL) with the Dimension EXL 200 Clinical Chemistry System device (Siemens, German).

The procedures were performed under conscious sedation with TTE monitoring, or under general anesthesia with monitoring by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Vascular access was obtained surgically. The following prostheses were used: self-expandable Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) and balloon-expandable Edwards-Sapien XT valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, USA).

The study population was followed for 1 year after TAVI. Post-hospitalization adverse events were collected by systematic phone calls with the patients and/or their relatives and/or their treating physicians, as well as by test reports and records of subsequent hospitalizations and interventions. Phone calls and follow-up records were performed at 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year. However, only one patient was lost to follow-up at 1 year.

TAVI success and complications were defined according to the criteria proposed by the Valve Academic Research Consortium: TAVI success was considered the implantation of only one prosthesis, final mean aortic transvalvular gradient < 20 mm Hg, Indexed effective orifice area > 0.85 cm2/m2 (> 0.7 cm2/m2 in patients with body mass index > 30 kg/m2), aortic regurgitation < 2+/4, and survival at 30 days. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was diagnosed by the presence of at least two of the following criteria: fever (> 38oC), tachycardia (> 90 beats/minute), tachypnea (> 20 breaths/minute), and leukocytosis (> 12000 leukocytes/mL).

CV events were defined as CV death or sudden undetermined death; hospitalization for any cause related to the CV system, such as arrhythmia, decompensated HF, coronary artery disease, percutaneous or surgical intervention; acute myocardial infarction; execution of coronary angioplasty; and ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis was presented in tables, and the observed data were expressed as median and interquartile range (Q1 and Q3) for numeric data, and frequency (n) and percentage (%) for categorical data, in addition to some illustrative graphs.

Inferential analysis consisted of the following methods: (1) the association of clinical and cardiologic data with 1-year survival was assessed in an univariate analysis using an individual Cox regression model; (2) the independent predictors of 1-year mortality were identified in a multivariate analysis using Cox regression with stepwise forward selection of variables; (3) the Kaplan-Meier curves were built to illustrate 1-year survival stratified by post-TAVI CPR subgroups and compared by log-rank statistics; (4) the association of clinical and cardiologic data with 1-year survival among survivors after hospital discharge was assessed in an univariate analysis using an individual Cox regression model; (5) the independent predictors of 1-year mortality among survivors after hospital discharge were identified in a multivariate analysis using Cox regression with stepwise forward selection of variables; (6) finally, an additional analysis was conducted, including only the patients who survived hospitalization, with a multivariate analysis to identify the independent predictors of 1-year mortality, using Cox regression with stepwise forward selection of variables.

Non-parametric methods were used, because all variables did not have a normal (Gaussian) distribution in at least one of the subgroups, leading to the rejection of the normality hypothesis according to the Shapiro-Wilks test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was conducted by the SAS System statistical software, version 6.11 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, USA).

Results

Population characteristics

From July 2009 to May 2015, 130 patients underwent TAVI on native valve at a single private hospital and were followed for 1 year.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are described in Table 1. Baseline serum creatinine was 1.1 (0.9-1.4) mg/dL, and creatinine clearance was estimated at 48.0 (21.8) mL/min by the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Baseline hemoglobin was 11.9 (10.4-13.1) mg/dL. Nine (6.9%) patients received blood transfusion before the procedure.

Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population

On baseline TTE, AVA was 0.6 (0.6-0.8) cm2, and mean left ventricle (LV)-aortic gradient was 45.5 (34.0-57.3) mm Hg. Associated moderate or severe aortic failure was present in 14 (10.8%) cases. LV ejection fraction (Simpson method) was 64.0% (48.0-73.0%).

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were performed days before TAVI in four (3.1%) and 13 (10.0%) patients, respectively.

Procedures were conducted under general anesthesia in 80.8% of the cases. Vascular access was TF in 123 (94.6%) patients, TSC in six (4.6%), and transaortic in one (0.8%). PCI was performed concomitantly with TAVI in eight (6.2%) cases. Valve pre-dilatation was performed in 107 (82.3%) patients. CoreValve prosthesis was implanted in 132 (97.0%) patients, and Edwards-Sapien XT prosthesis in four (3.0%). The number of rapid pacing runs was 1.0 (1.0-2.0). Maneuvers to correct paraprosthetic regurgitation were conducted in 43 patients, of which 38 (36.9%) underwent post-dilatation, four (3.1%) underwent implantation of a second valve, and one (0.8%) underwent bow traction.

Mean LV-aortic gradient on TTE was reduced from 45.5 (34.0-57.3) mm Hg at baseline to 7.0 (5.0-10) mm Hg (p<0.001) after the procedure. At the end, moderate paraprosthetic regurgitation was found in 7 (5.4%) patients.

Thirty (23.1%) cases required implantation of a new permanent pacemaker. There were vascular complications in seven (5.4%) patients. A total of 28 (21.5%) patients were subjected to blood transfusion: of which 10 (7.6%) received one red blood cell (RBC) unit, 9 (6.9%) received from 2 to 3 RBC units, and 9 (6.9%) received 4 RBC units or more.

Acute renal failure (ARF) was observed in 31 (23.8%) patients, of which 25 (19.5%), 4 (3.1%), and 2 (1.6%) were classified into stages I, II and III, respectively, in the first 72 hours. Hemodialysis was performed in 5 (3.9%) patients during hospitalization. Platelet count ranged from 194 (158-237) thousand/mm3 to 135 (101-165) thousand/mm3, with nadir at 72 hours (p < 0.0001).

Implantation success was obtained in 115 (88.5%) patients. Length of hospital stay after TAVI was 7 (6-7) days, ranging from 3-212 days.

Intra-hospital mortality occurred em 8 (6.2%) patients, with 1 death after 30 days for sepsis.

Inflammatory response before and after TAVI

SIRS was identified in 55 (42.6%) patients. Urinary or respiratory tract infections were treated with antibiotics in 13 (10.0%) patients. Blood or urine cultures were positive in 4 cases.

Leukocyte count ranged from 6675 (5535-8623) cells/mm3 at baseline to 10520 (8570-13800) cells/mm3, reaching its peak 24 hours after TAVI (p < 0.001).

Baseline CRP was 0.3 (0.2-1.0) mg/dL, and 41 (34.5%) patients showed high CRP levels (> 0.5 mg/dL). Peak CRP was 7.0 (5.3-12.1) mg/dL and occurred on the fourth day after TAVI (Figure 1).

Figure 1
CRP concentration in the first week. CRP: C-reactive protein.

Follow-up at 30 days and 1 year

At 30-day follow-up, there were 7 (5.4%) deaths. Ten (7.8%) patients were readmitted, 8 of which due to CV events.

Overall 1-year mortality was 14.6%. Deaths had a CV cause in 8 (42.0%) patients, and a non-CV cause in 11 (58.0%), with a predominance of sepsis (n = 9) in the last group.

An analysis was made to compare survivors and non-survivors at 1 year (Table 2). Independent predictors of 1-year mortality were the presence of ARF, high baseline CRP, and blood transfusion ≥ 4 RBC units (Table 3), and 1-year survival curves stratified by these variables are shown in Figure 2. When we assessed patients only after hospital discharge, we observe that baseline CRP > 0.5 mg/dL remained as an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (Table 4).

Table 2
Characteristics of non-survivors and survivors at 1 year follow-up
Table 3
Cox regression multivariate analysis of 1-year mortality
Figure 2
Rates of 1-year survival stratified by (A) presence of ARF, (B) baseline CRP > 0.5 mg/dL, and (C) blood transfusion > 1 RBC unit. CRP – C-reactive protein; ARF: acute renal failure; RBC: red blood cell.
Table 4
Cox regression multivariate analysis for 1-year mortality in hospital-discharged patients

The comparison between the groups with high (> 0.5 mg/dL) and normal baseline CPR is presented in Table 5.

Table 5
Characteristics of groups with baseline CRP > 0.5 mg/dL and ≤ 0.5 g/dL

Peak CRP ≥ 10.0 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 64.7% and specificity of 69.2% for 1-year mortality on the receiver operating characteristic curve, with area under the curve = 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.86; p = 0.005). Peak CRP after TAVI was a predictor of 1-year mortality only in the univariate analysis, with hazard ratio (HR) = 1.14 (95%CI, 1.06-1.22; p < 0.0001).

Discussion

This study assessed the impact of inflammatory response on 1-year mortality after TAVI through CRP levels in the pre- and post-operative periods, with predominance of CoreValve placement via TF access. Low intensity chronic inflammation (CRP > 0.5 mg/dL) before TAVI occurred in one third of the patients and was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (HR 4.1; p = 0.01). Peak CRP was observed from the third to the forth days, with peak CRP ≥ 10 mg/dL being associated with greater mortality, but this was influenced by the presence of ARF and large blood transfusions.

The assessment of prognosis through inflammatory biomarkers before-TAVI was also performed by Sinning et al.,77 Sinning JM, Wollert KC, Sedaghat A, Widera C, Radermacher MC, Descoups C, et al. Risk scores and biomarkers forthe prediction of 1-year outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2015;170(4):821-9. who reported that the inflammatory biomarker GDF-15 and the surgical risk score EuroSCORE II were the best predictors of 1-year mortality after TAVI. In their study, pre-TAVI CRP led to higher risk of mortality (HR 1.2; 95%CI 1.0-1.4; p = 0.012). Similarly, we found that median pre-TAVI CRP indicated higher risk of 1-year mortality (HR 1.2; 95%CI 1.0-1.3; p < 0.001). However, we believe that analysis of CRP as a categorical variable showed to be more useful, especially when adopting the cutoff value of > 0.5 mg/dL, based on publications that involved heart surgery88 Cappabianca G, Paparella D, Visicchio G, Capone G, Lionetti G, Numis F, et al. Preoperative C-reactive proteinpredicts mid-term outcome after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(6):2170-8. and, more recently, TAVI.99 Krumsdorf U, Chorianopoulos E, Pleger ST, Kallenbach K, Karck M, Katus HA, et al. C-reactive protein kinetics and its prognostic value after transfemoral aortic valve implantation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(6):282-6.,1010 Stähli BE, Grünenfelder J, Jacobs S, Falk V, Landmesser U, Wischnewsky MB, et al. Assessment of inflammatory response to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to transapical and surgical procedures: a pilot study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(8):407-11.

High CRP in the preoperative period of heart operations was associated with higher mortality in the study by Cappabianca et al.,88 Cappabianca G, Paparella D, Visicchio G, Capone G, Lionetti G, Numis F, et al. Preoperative C-reactive proteinpredicts mid-term outcome after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(6):2170-8. who assessed preoperative CRP among 597 patients subjected to different types of heart surgery (SAVR in 15%) and observed that those with CRP > 0.5 mg/dL evolved to higher mortality at 3-years follow-up (odds ratio [OR], 1.93; p = 0.05). Reference values for CRP < 0.3 mg/dL were proposed based on an epidemiological study that assessed CV events without performing invasive procedures and may not represent the best cutoff value in the surgical context.

In this study, high baseline CRP was associated with decompensated HF, with greater proportion of patients in functional class IV and higher levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). Villacorta et al.1111 Villacorta H, Masetto AC, Mesquita ET. C-reactive protein: an inflammatory marker with prognostic value in patients with decompensated heart failure. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007;88(5):585-9. showed that patients with LV systolic dysfunction and decompensated HF showed higher CRP levels on admission. Jensen et al. described the relationship between CRP and BNP in decompensated HF.1212 Jensen J, Ma LP, Fu ML, Svaninger D, Lundberg PA, Hammarsten O. Inflammation increases NT-proBNP and the NT-proBNP/BNP ratio. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010;99(7):445-52. However, it is little likely that the worse prognosis related to CRP levels may be exclusively attributable to its relationship with HF, since more than a half of death had a non-CV cause.

Chronically high CRP has also been described among older adult, with growing evidence that chronic systemic inflammation has an impact on quality of life and on survival. The expression inflammaging was proposed to describe the many conditions related to the presence of inflammation in older adults.1313 Franceschi C, Capri M, Monti D, Giunta S, Olivieri F, Sevini F, et al. Inflammaging and anti-inflammaging: a systemic perspective on aging and longevity emerged from studies in humans. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;128(1):92-105. A meta-analysis identified 20 circulating blood biomarkers that could be potentially used in the prognostic assessment of older adults, with CRP being a predictor of overall mortality (HR = 1.4; p < 0.001) and CV mortality (HR = 1.3; p = 0,03).1414 Barron E, Lara J, White M, Mathers JC. Blood-borne biomarkers of mortality risk: systematic review of cohort studies. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0127550. In the present study, no relationship was observed between CRP and advanced age, but higher STS scores were observed in the group with high baseline CRP (19% vs 7%; p = 0,001), which suggests that it may be correlated with patients’ overall health. The group with pre-TAVI CRP > 0.5 mg/dL had intra-hospital outcomes with higher peak CRP and ARF, in addition to more severe thrombocytopenia.

After TAVI, CRP kinetics in response to the procedure during the first week reached its peak between 72-96 hours, with high values up to the seventh day, in line with other studies.99 Krumsdorf U, Chorianopoulos E, Pleger ST, Kallenbach K, Karck M, Katus HA, et al. C-reactive protein kinetics and its prognostic value after transfemoral aortic valve implantation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(6):282-6.,1515 Ruparelia N, Panoulas VF, Frame A, Ariff B, Sutaria N, Fertleman M, et al. Impact of clinical and procedural factors upon C-reactive protein dynamics following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. World J Cardiol. 2016;8(7):425-31. CRP kinetics in patients subjected to TAVI via TF is different from that found in SAVR.

Traditionally, the peak value of an inflammatory biomarker is considered the maximal inflammatory response obtained. In the short term, peak CRP was assessed by Krumsdorf et al.99 Krumsdorf U, Chorianopoulos E, Pleger ST, Kallenbach K, Karck M, Katus HA, et al. C-reactive protein kinetics and its prognostic value after transfemoral aortic valve implantation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(6):282-6., who observed, in an univariate analysis, that CRP ≥ 10 mg/dL was associated with higher 30-day mortality. This short-term finding was not confirmed by Ruparelia et al.1515 Ruparelia N, Panoulas VF, Frame A, Ariff B, Sutaria N, Fertleman M, et al. Impact of clinical and procedural factors upon C-reactive protein dynamics following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. World J Cardiol. 2016;8(7):425-31. In the long term, the prognostic value of high CRP values has not been described yet. In the present study, it was found that peak CRP ≥ 10mg/dL was able to predict 1-year mortality (HR = 3.74; p = 0.009); however, this variable was not an independent factor.

In the present sample, no association was found between some technical aspects and degree of inflammation, such as number of rapid pacing runs or direct implantation (without balloon pre-dilatation before TAVI). Sinning et al.1616 Sinning JM, Scheer AC, Adenauer V, Ghanem A, Hammerstingl C, Schueler R, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome predicts increased mortality in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(12):1459-68. observed a correlation between SIRS e o number of rapid pacing runs and/or post-dilatation. Ruparelia et al.1515 Ruparelia N, Panoulas VF, Frame A, Ariff B, Sutaria N, Fertleman M, et al. Impact of clinical and procedural factors upon C-reactive protein dynamics following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. World J Cardiol. 2016;8(7):425-31. found a higher peak CRP on the third day among patients who underwent pre-dilatation (11.0 [0.8] mg/dL vs 5.1 [0.3] mg/dL; p < 0.001).

In the present study, independent post-operative predictors of poor prognosis at 1 year were ARF and large blood transfusion (≥ 4 RBC units), confirmed by other authors.1717 Tchetche D, Van der Boon RM, Dumonteil N, Chieffo A, Van Mieghem NM, Farah B, et al. Adverse impact of bleeding and transfusion on the outcome post- transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the Pooled-RotterdAm-Milano-Toulouse In Collaboration Plus (PRAGMATIC Plus) initiative. Am Heart J. 2012;164(3):402-9.,1818 Seiffert M, Conradi L, Terstesse AC, Koschyk D, Schirmer J, Schnabel RB, et al. Blood transfusion is associated with impaired outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85(3):460-7. CV deaths (42%) were almost as frequent as non-CV deaths (58%), which was consistent with the PARTNER trial.1919 Svensson LG, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, Brozzi N, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Comprehensive analysis of mortality among patients undergoing TAVR: results of the PARTNER trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(2):158-68.

The assessment of prognostic factors related to TAVI has several implications that relate from surgical strategy to assessment of procedure futility. The contribution of this study may aid other studies in the comparison of techniques and valve prostheses. It is important to emphasize that the prostheses used in this study were soon replaced with new versions that require smaller introducer sheaths, which may reduce vascular complications. Therefore, this study may be used as a parameter for future comparisons.

The present study had limitations related to its observational, retrospective and non-consecutive design. Although its sample represents one of the largest unicentric national investigations, sample size was small compared with that of multicentric international studies, and the CV events were not assessed in an event adjudication center. Levels of CRP and BNP at post-discharge follow-up could clarify the relationship between HF and valve inflammation, as well as the potential inflammatory role of unresected valve leaflets that remained incarcerated by the implanted valve prosthesis.

Conclusions

Pre-TAVI CRP > 0.5 mg/dL is present in one third of the cases and showed to be an independent predictor of 1-year mortality, as well as the presence of ARF and large blood transfusions. Peak CRP occurs from the third to the fourth day after TAVI and, when reaching ≥ 10 mg/dL, it is correlated with higher 1-year mortality, although being dependent on other factors, such as ARF and blood transfusion.

  • Sources of Funding
    There were no external funding sources for this study.
  • Study Association
    This article is part of the thesis of master submitted by Andre Silveira Sousa, from Pós-graduação de Ciências Cardiovasculares da Universidade Federal Fluminense.

Referências

  • 1
    Brasil. Presidência da República. Secretaria de Direitos Humanos. Secretaria Nacional de Promoção Defesa dos Direitos Humanos. [Internet]. Dados sobre o envelhecimento no Brasil. [acesso em 2016 set. 21]. Disponível em:<http://www.sdh.gov.br/assuntos/pessoa-idosa/dados-estatisticos/DadossobreoenvelhecimentonoBrasil.pdf>
    » http://www.sdh.gov.br/assuntos/pessoa-idosa/dados-estatisticos/DadossobreoenvelhecimentonoBrasil.pdf
  • 2
    Franceschi C, Campisi J. Chronic inflammation (inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S4-9.
  • 3
    Wu IC, Lin CC, Hsiung CA. Emerging roles of frailty and inflammaging in risk assessment of age-related chronic diseases in older adults: the intersection between aging biology and personalized medicine. Biomedicine (Taipei). 2015;5(1):1.
  • 4
    Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach D, Gown A, O’Brien KD. Characterization of the early lesion of ‘degenerative’ valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation. 1994;90(2):844-53.
  • 5
    Mazzone A, Epistolato MC, De Caterina R, Storti S, Vittorini S, Sbrana S, et al. Neoangiogenesis, T-lymphocyte infiltration, and heat shock protein-60 are biological hallmarks of an immunomediated inflammatory process in end-stagecalcified aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(9):1670-6.
  • 6
    Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(15):1438-54.
  • 7
    Sinning JM, Wollert KC, Sedaghat A, Widera C, Radermacher MC, Descoups C, et al. Risk scores and biomarkers forthe prediction of 1-year outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2015;170(4):821-9.
  • 8
    Cappabianca G, Paparella D, Visicchio G, Capone G, Lionetti G, Numis F, et al. Preoperative C-reactive proteinpredicts mid-term outcome after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(6):2170-8.
  • 9
    Krumsdorf U, Chorianopoulos E, Pleger ST, Kallenbach K, Karck M, Katus HA, et al. C-reactive protein kinetics and its prognostic value after transfemoral aortic valve implantation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(6):282-6.
  • 10
    Stähli BE, Grünenfelder J, Jacobs S, Falk V, Landmesser U, Wischnewsky MB, et al. Assessment of inflammatory response to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to transapical and surgical procedures: a pilot study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(8):407-11.
  • 11
    Villacorta H, Masetto AC, Mesquita ET. C-reactive protein: an inflammatory marker with prognostic value in patients with decompensated heart failure. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007;88(5):585-9.
  • 12
    Jensen J, Ma LP, Fu ML, Svaninger D, Lundberg PA, Hammarsten O. Inflammation increases NT-proBNP and the NT-proBNP/BNP ratio. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010;99(7):445-52.
  • 13
    Franceschi C, Capri M, Monti D, Giunta S, Olivieri F, Sevini F, et al. Inflammaging and anti-inflammaging: a systemic perspective on aging and longevity emerged from studies in humans. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;128(1):92-105.
  • 14
    Barron E, Lara J, White M, Mathers JC. Blood-borne biomarkers of mortality risk: systematic review of cohort studies. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0127550.
  • 15
    Ruparelia N, Panoulas VF, Frame A, Ariff B, Sutaria N, Fertleman M, et al. Impact of clinical and procedural factors upon C-reactive protein dynamics following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. World J Cardiol. 2016;8(7):425-31.
  • 16
    Sinning JM, Scheer AC, Adenauer V, Ghanem A, Hammerstingl C, Schueler R, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome predicts increased mortality in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(12):1459-68.
  • 17
    Tchetche D, Van der Boon RM, Dumonteil N, Chieffo A, Van Mieghem NM, Farah B, et al. Adverse impact of bleeding and transfusion on the outcome post- transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the Pooled-RotterdAm-Milano-Toulouse In Collaboration Plus (PRAGMATIC Plus) initiative. Am Heart J. 2012;164(3):402-9.
  • 18
    Seiffert M, Conradi L, Terstesse AC, Koschyk D, Schirmer J, Schnabel RB, et al. Blood transfusion is associated with impaired outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85(3):460-7.
  • 19
    Svensson LG, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, Brozzi N, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Comprehensive analysis of mortality among patients undergoing TAVR: results of the PARTNER trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(2):158-68.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    22 Nov 2021
  • Date of issue
    Nov 2021

History

  • Received
    28 Oct 2019
  • Reviewed
    17 Aug 2020
  • Accepted
    02 Dec 2020
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC Avenida Marechal Câmara, 160, sala: 330, Centro, CEP: 20020-907, (21) 3478-2700 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil, Fax: +55 21 3478-2770 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@cardiol.br