BEYOND BUREAUCRATIC ETHICS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN BEINGS

CHIMENTÃO, Lilian Kemmer; REIS, Simone

doi:10.1590/1981-5794-1911-9

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Alfa: Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto)

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

ORIGINAL ARTICLES • Alfa, Rev. Linguíst 63 (3) • Sep-Dec 2019 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5794-1911-9 copy

BEYOND BUREAUCRATIC ETHICS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN BEINGS ¹ 1 Text derived from the first author’s doctoral research done under the advisory of the second author, through the Language Studies Graduate Program at the State University of Londrina.

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

NODDINGS, 1984NODDINGS, N. Caring: a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkley: University of California Press, 1984. Denzin (1997)DENZIN, N.K. Interpretive ethnography: ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1997.

Emancipatory Ethics; Empowerment; Foreign language teacher training

Script	Written by	To interview
1	Coordinator	Supervisor
2	Coordinator	Student teachers (6)
3	Supervisor	Coordinator
4	Supervisor	Student teachers (6)
5	Student teachers	Coordinator
6		Supervisor
7		Student teachers (6)

	Decoder	Analytical-Technical	Critical
Validation	SARA: “I agree with all points presented, because I can see the relationship between the excerpts and their analysis”; SARA: “I do not disagree with any point”; ÚRSULA: “I agree with everything I’ve read”; VICTOR: “I agree with all the interpretations”; ZÉLIA: “I totally agree”; SARA: “I reread on the text and saw that nothing of what is said in your speech as a researcher is outside the excerpt that was used to illustrate the situation”; VICTOR: “I recalled several times [my experience] in the teacher education program and I assert that I had all those gains”;	SARA: I consider the analysis of the perception of the “yes”, and even more the perception of the “other”, where only two student teachers expressed concern about the students. VICTOR: “As an example: hierarchy of the group (I agree with all definitions), lack of emancipation (really that was scarce in students-teachers)”; ZÉLIA: “At the time, PIBID served to reinforce my desire not to be a teacher, but I believe that this was because of the context in which we work, because, despite being a differentiated, collaborative stage, I was aware that, in fact, I would not feel good assuming a class of elementary school with more than 35 students “; ÚRSULA: “The topics (SELF x OTHER, etc.) show us more clearly what most participants thought/think about PIBID and how it affected each of us”; SARA: “I think the text is well illustrated and its support for analysis is well done”;	VICTOR: “At the moment, I’m sure that I want to continue working as a teacher, specifically, in the context of a public school”; ZÉLIA: “However, in the last year of college, I chose the internship in the context of early childhood education (outside of PIBID) and that’s when I discovered that I wanted to teach English, but [I wanted to teach] children. Today, as an English teacher, I work in the area of early childhood education and I can say that I am very happy with what I do “; SARA: “I realized after reading that I cannot remember exactly what I said years ago, I think that over time I have changed my view of some things or behaved differently.” ÚRSULA: “Before reading, I was trying to remember what I said during the interview at that time so I could compare it to what I think today. During, I could notice that my opinion on PIBID has not changed in hardly anything. I still think that this program is essential in teacher education and I hope that many student teachers will have the chance to participate [in the program]”;
Refutation	SARA: “I also tried to identify myself through the speeches exposed in the text, and, for some reason, I could not identify myself”; SARA: “I could not see myself in any speech.”

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Rua Quirino de Andrade, 215, 01049-010 São Paulo - SP, Tel. (55 11) 5627-0233 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: alfa@unesp.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Brasil

Brasil

BEYOND BUREAUCRATIC ETHICS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN BEINGS 1 1 Text derived from the first author’s doctoral research done under the advisory of the second author, through the Language Studies Graduate Program at the State University of Londrina.

ABSTRACT

BEYOND BUREAUCRATIC ETHICS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN BEINGS ¹ 1 Text derived from the first author’s doctoral research done under the advisory of the second author, through the Language Studies Graduate Program at the State University of Londrina.