UV/H2O2 process performance improvement by ultrafiltration and physicochemical clarification systems for industrial effluent pretreatment

Mierzwa, José Carlos; Subtil, Eduardo Lucas; Hespanhol, Ivanildo

doi:10.4136/ambi-agua.926

Abstracts

The present study evaluated the removal of TOC from an effluent with high organic load resulted from the treatment of oil-water emulsion by thermal process. Hollow Fiber Ultrafiltration membrane (HF-UF) and physicochemical clarification process were used as pretreatment options to assess the influence of feed effluent quality on the UV/H2O2 oxidation process. Results for TOC removals showed HF-UF and physicochemical clarification processes can significantly improve the efficiency of UV/H2O2 oxidation process, when compared with the direct effluent oxidation. Reaction time for obtaining a TOC removal higher than 90% was reduced to approximately half of the time needed when no pretreatment was applied. Considering both pretreatment processes it was not possible to notice any significant difference on the UV/H2O2 oxidation process performance. However, the complexity of physicochemical process due to the use of three different chemicals and sludge production made the HF-UF process the best pretreatment alternative, without increasing the Total Dissolved Solids of the effluent, a very important issue when water reuse is considered.

UV/H2O2; ultrafiltration; physicochemical process

O presente trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar a remoção de COT de um efluente com elevada concentração de matéria orgânica proveniente do tratamento de emulsão (água/óleo) por processo térmico. Um processo de separação por membranas de fibra-oca e outro de clarificação físico-químico foram usados como opções de pré-tratamento para avaliar a influência da qualidade do efluente sobre o processo de oxidação UV/H2O2. Os resultados de remoção de COT demonstraram que tanto o processo de membranas quanto o físico-químico podem melhorar significativamente a eficiência do processo de oxidação UV/H2O2. O tempo de reação necessário para uma remoção de 90% de COT foi reduzido pela metade quando comprado com a oxidação direta do efluente. Considerando ambos os processos de pré-tratamento não foi possível observar nenhuma diferença significativa sobre o desempenho do processo de oxidação UV/H2O2. Entretanto, a complexidade do processo físico-químico devido ao uso de três diferentes compostos e a produção de lodo faz do sistema de membranas a melhor alternativa de pré-tratamento.

UV/H2O2; ultrafiltração; processo físico-químico

References

AMERICA PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION - APHA. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 20. ed. Washington, DC, 1999.
²ARSLAN, I.; BALCIOGLU, I. A.; TUHKANEN, T.; BAHNEMANN, D. H₂O₂/UV and Fe²⁺/ H₂O₂/UV-c versus TiO₂/UV-A treatment for reactive dye wastewater. Journal of Environmental Engineering, v. 126, n. 10, p. 903-911, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:10(903)
BENÍTEZ, F. J.; ACERO, J. L.; LEAL, A. I.; REAL, F. J. Ozone and membrane filtration based strategies for the treatment of cork processing wastewaters. Journal of Hazardous Material, v. 152, n. 1, p. 373-380, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.007
BRAUN, A. M.; OLIVEROS, E. How to evaluate photochemical methods for water treatment. Water Science and Technology. v. 35, n. 4, p. 17-23, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00004-8
BELTRÁN, F. J.; GONZÁLEZ, M.; GONZÁLEZ, J. F. Industrial wastewater advanced oxidation. Part 1. UV radiation in the presence and absence of hydrogen peroxide. Water Research, v. 31, n. 10, p. 2405-2414, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00077-8
CATER, S. R.; STEFAN, M. I.; BOLTON, J. R.; SAFARZADEH-AMIRI, A. UV/H₂O₂ Treatment of methyl tert-butyl ether in contaminated water. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 34, n. 4, p. 659-662, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es9905750
DIYA'UDDEEN, B. H.; DAUD, W. M. A. W.; ABDUL AZIZ, A. R. Treatment technologies for petroleum refinery effluents: a review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, v. 89, n. 2, p. 95-105, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2010.11.003
EINSCHLAG, F. S. G.; LOPEZ, J.; CARLOS, L.; CAPPARELLI, A.L.; BRAUN, A. M.; OLIVEROS, E. Evaluation of the efficiency of photodegradation on Nitroaromatics applying the UV/H₂O₂ technique. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 36, n. 18, p. 3936-3944, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0103039
FAKHRU'L-RAZI, A.; PENDASHTEH, A.; ABDULLAH, L. C.; BIAK, D. R. A.; MADAENI, S. S.; ABIDIN, Z. Z. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced wastewater treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, v. 170, n. 2/3, p. 530-551, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044
GAO, N.; DENG, Y.; ZHAO, D. Ametryn degradation in the ultraviolet (UV) irradiation/hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, v. 164, n. 2/3, p. 640-645, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.038
GUTIÉRREZ, G.; BENITO, J. M.; COCA, J.; PAZOS, CJ. Vacuum evaporation of surfactant solutions and oil-in-water emulsions. Chemical Engineering Journal, v. 162, n. 1, p. 201-207, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.029
GUTIÉRREZ, G.; LOBO, A.; BENITO, J. M.; COCA, J.; PAZOS, C. Treatment of a waste oil-in-water emulsion from a copper-rolling process by ultrafiltration and vacuum evaporation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, v. 185, n. 2/3, p. 1569-1574, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.088
LITTER, M. I. Introduction to photochemical advanced oxidation processes for water treatment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. v. 2, p. 325-366, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b138188
MAO, W.; MA, H.; WANG, B. Performance of batch vacuum distillation process with promoters on coke-plant wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, v. 160, n. 1, p. 232-238, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.053
OLLER, I.; MALATO, S.; SÁNCHES-PÉREZ, J. A. Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination - a review. Science of the Total Environment, v. 409, n. 10, p. 4141-4166, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.061
SAQUIB, M.; VINCKIER, C.; VAN DER BRUGGEN, B. The effect of UF on the efficiency of O₃/H₂O₂ for the removal of organics from surface water. Desalination, v. 260, n. 1/3, p. 39-42, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.05.003
UNITED STATES. Environmental Protection Agency - USEPA. Handbook of advanced photochemical oxidation processes. Washington, DC, 1998. Report EPA/625/R-98/004.
YAHIAOUI, O.; LOUNICI, H.; ABDI, N.; DROUICHE, N.; GHAFFOUR, N.; PAUSS, A.; MAMERI, N. Treatment of olive mill wastewater by the combination of ultrafiltration and bipolar electrochemical reactor processes. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, v. 50, n. 1, p. 37-41, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.11.003

Publication Dates

Publication in this collection
16 Sept 2014
Date of issue
Dec 2012

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

[1] AMERICA PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION - APHA. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 20. ed. Washington, DC, 1999.

[2] ²ARSLAN, I.; BALCIOGLU, I. A.; TUHKANEN, T.; BAHNEMANN, D. H₂O₂/UV and Fe²⁺/ H₂O₂/UV-c versus TiO₂/UV-A treatment for reactive dye wastewater. Journal of Environmental Engineering, v. 126, n. 10, p. 903-911, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:10(903)

[3] BENÍTEZ, F. J.; ACERO, J. L.; LEAL, A. I.; REAL, F. J. Ozone and membrane filtration based strategies for the treatment of cork processing wastewaters. Journal of Hazardous Material, v. 152, n. 1, p. 373-380, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.007

[4] BRAUN, A. M.; OLIVEROS, E. How to evaluate photochemical methods for water treatment. Water Science and Technology. v. 35, n. 4, p. 17-23, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00004-8

[5] BELTRÁN, F. J.; GONZÁLEZ, M.; GONZÁLEZ, J. F. Industrial wastewater advanced oxidation. Part 1. UV radiation in the presence and absence of hydrogen peroxide. Water Research, v. 31, n. 10, p. 2405-2414, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00077-8

[6] CATER, S. R.; STEFAN, M. I.; BOLTON, J. R.; SAFARZADEH-AMIRI, A. UV/H₂O₂ Treatment of methyl tert-butyl ether in contaminated water. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 34, n. 4, p. 659-662, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es9905750

[7] DIYA'UDDEEN, B. H.; DAUD, W. M. A. W.; ABDUL AZIZ, A. R. Treatment technologies for petroleum refinery effluents: a review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, v. 89, n. 2, p. 95-105, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2010.11.003

[8] EINSCHLAG, F. S. G.; LOPEZ, J.; CARLOS, L.; CAPPARELLI, A.L.; BRAUN, A. M.; OLIVEROS, E. Evaluation of the efficiency of photodegradation on Nitroaromatics applying the UV/H₂O₂ technique. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 36, n. 18, p. 3936-3944, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0103039

[9] FAKHRU'L-RAZI, A.; PENDASHTEH, A.; ABDULLAH, L. C.; BIAK, D. R. A.; MADAENI, S. S.; ABIDIN, Z. Z. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced wastewater treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, v. 170, n. 2/3, p. 530-551, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044

[10] GAO, N.; DENG, Y.; ZHAO, D. Ametryn degradation in the ultraviolet (UV) irradiation/hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, v. 164, n. 2/3, p. 640-645, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.038

[11] GUTIÉRREZ, G.; BENITO, J. M.; COCA, J.; PAZOS, CJ. Vacuum evaporation of surfactant solutions and oil-in-water emulsions. Chemical Engineering Journal, v. 162, n. 1, p. 201-207, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.029

[12] GUTIÉRREZ, G.; LOBO, A.; BENITO, J. M.; COCA, J.; PAZOS, C. Treatment of a waste oil-in-water emulsion from a copper-rolling process by ultrafiltration and vacuum evaporation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, v. 185, n. 2/3, p. 1569-1574, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.088

[13] LITTER, M. I. Introduction to photochemical advanced oxidation processes for water treatment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. v. 2, p. 325-366, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b138188

[14] MAO, W.; MA, H.; WANG, B. Performance of batch vacuum distillation process with promoters on coke-plant wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, v. 160, n. 1, p. 232-238, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.053

[15] OLLER, I.; MALATO, S.; SÁNCHES-PÉREZ, J. A. Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination - a review. Science of the Total Environment, v. 409, n. 10, p. 4141-4166, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.061

[16] SAQUIB, M.; VINCKIER, C.; VAN DER BRUGGEN, B. The effect of UF on the efficiency of O₃/H₂O₂ for the removal of organics from surface water. Desalination, v. 260, n. 1/3, p. 39-42, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.05.003

[17] UNITED STATES. Environmental Protection Agency - USEPA. Handbook of advanced photochemical oxidation processes. Washington, DC, 1998. Report EPA/625/R-98/004.

[18] YAHIAOUI, O.; LOUNICI, H.; ABDI, N.; DROUICHE, N.; GHAFFOUR, N.; PAUSS, A.; MAMERI, N. Treatment of olive mill wastewater by the combination of ultrafiltration and bipolar electrochemical reactor processes. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, v. 50, n. 1, p. 37-41, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.11.003

UV/H2O2 process performance improvement by ultrafiltration and physicochemical clarification systems for industrial effluent pretreatment

Melhora do desempenho do processo UV/H2O2 usando sistemas de ultrafiltração e de clarificação físico-química como pré-tratamento de efluente industrial

Abstracts

References

Publication Dates