Quality of antenatal care as a risk factor for early onset neonatal infections in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Background:

Neonatal infection is a serious public health problem. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the antenatal care on the risk of early-onset neonatal healthcare associated infection in two Brazilian maternities.

Methods:

Cohort study - Newborns admitted at two public neonatal intensive care units from 2008 to 2009 were included in the study. Data on antenatal and perinatal variables were collected from maternal prenatal cards and medical charts. Newborns were actively surveyed for early-onset neonatal healthcare associated infection, defined as a neonatal infection diagnosed within 48 h after birth. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess variables independently associated with early-onset neonatal healthcare associated infection.

Results:

561 neonate-mother pairs were included in the study. Early-onset neonatal health-care associated infection was diagnosed in 283 neonates (51%), an incidence rate of 43.5/1000 live births. Neonates whose mothers had less then six antenatal visits were under risk significantly higher for early-onset neonatal healthcare associated infection (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.11-2.57), after adjusting for birth weight, membranes ruptured for >18 h, maternal complications during delivery, maternal infection at admission, and hospital where patients received care.

Conclusions:

The risk of neonatal early-onset neonatal healthcare associated infection was significantly associated with insufficient number of antenatal care visits. Further studies assessing the quality of antenatal care and targeting its improvement are warranted.

Early-onset healthcare associated infections; Antenatal care; Newborn; Public maternity

Introduction

Neonatal infection is a major cause of morbidity and the second leading cause of neonatal death worldwide. It has been estimated that, in developing countries, neonatal infection causes 1.6 million deaths per year.¹

Brazil follows global trends as the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) is the main component of the infant mortality rate (IMR). In fact, there was a decrease in Brazilian NMR from 27/1000 live births in 1990 to 10/1000 live births in 2011, but it still remains elevated as compared to the rates reported from other countries such as Japan (1/1000 live births), Canada (4/1000 live births), USA (4/1000 live births), and Chile (5/1000 live births). Additionally, little change has been observed in the early neonatal component of IMR, a period covering the first seven days of life.²

A considerable proportion of the deaths that occur during the first week of life in Brazil are associated with neonatal infections of maternal origin (MO), which are closely related to the health care provided to pregnant women during ante-natal care.^{3 , 4} The vast majority of these infections present within 48 h after birth and are called early-onset healthcare associated infections (EOHCAI). They occur mainly due to vertical transmission of microorganisms present in the maternal genital tract and are acquired mostly in the perinatal period and during delivery.⁵ They are associated with maternal risk factors such as: premature rupture of membranes (PROM) above 18 h before delivery; chorioamnionitis; untreated maternal urinary tract infection (UTI); Streptococcus agalactiae vaginal colonization without intrapartum chemoprophylaxis; mater- nal fever 48 h before delivery; maternal and fetal invasive procedures 72 h before delivery.^{6 - 8}

In Brazil, the EOHCAI, low birth weight, and prematurity have attributed to inappropriate assistance to pregnant women.⁹ The antenatal care is an opportunity to raise awareness and educate women about the care of their own health and of their concepts, related to changes in lifestyle habits (exercise and nutritional status) and behavioral risk factors (cessation of smoking, alcohol, drug using, and guidance on preventing sexually transmitted infections).¹⁰ This period allows for the diagnosis and treatment of various complica- tions during pregnancy and consequently, the reduction or elimination of risk factors for EOHCAI.⁹

The main objective of this study was to assess whether adherence to antenatal care would decrease the risk of EOHCAI in two public Municipal hospitals (MHS) in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Methods

The present study, undertaken through a partnership between the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and Rio de Janeiro Municipality Health Department (RJMHS), was a prospective cohort study carried out in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and Neonatal Intermediary Care Unit (NiCU) of two public hospitals of RJMHS, totaling 34 NICU beds and 28 NiCU beds in the period of July 2008 to February, 2009.

Both hospitals had a level II NICU, a conventional NiCU, and a kangaroo neonatal intermediate care unit. The intensive and intermediate care provided to newborns was carried out in separate environments by a team of health care workers that included neonatologists, pediatric residents, nurses, nurse-assistants, physiotherapists, and speech therapists. The overall average occupancy rate was (123%). High-complexity surgical procedures were not performed in any of the study centers.

In both centers, maternity care was provided by obstetricians and residents in obstetrics, anesthesiologists, nurses, and nurse-assistants. Unit 1 was a reference center for high risk pregnancies.

Both maternity hospitals had an infection control team. They performed active infection surveillance according to National Healthcare Safety Network.¹¹ They also provided counseling on antimicrobial use, monitored multidrug-resistant microorganisms, and implemented basic measures for prevention and control of healthcare associated infections (HCAI). All newborns admitted to NICU/NiCU and their mothers were eligible for the study. Each neonate-mother pair was included in the study only after the mother signed a written informed consent. Patients were excluded if the delivery had not taken place in one of the two study centers. Twins and newborns who had less than 24 h of follow-up were also excluded.

After inclusion in the study, data on the antenatal care was gathered using a standardized questionnaire to be filled in by the mother. Additional data on the prenatal care were abstracted from the antenatal care card. This is a document that all pregnant women who attend antenatal care in Brazil must have, in which dates of medical visits and clinical, laboratory, and medication data are recorded. It is recommended that pregnant women take this card to the maternity hospital at the time of delivery. The medical charts of mothers and neonates were also used to collect data on perinatal variables and on neonate infections. The following variables were assessed: maternal age at delivery; gestational age at birth (Ballard method); number of antenatal care visits; number of previous pregnancies, births and abortions, previous prematurity, previous stillbirth, previous neonatal death; gestational complication (hypertension, diabetes, sexually transmitted infections); risk behavior (smoking, alcohol use, illicit drug use during pregnancy); antenatal tests: VDRL, urine culture, serology for HIV and toxoplasmosis, culture for S. agalactiae; and treatment procedures; type of delivery, duration of ruptured membranes and labor; antepartum maternal fever; birth complications; antibiotic use in the antenatal care, labor/delivery/neonatal periods; maternal infections, and neonatal infections diagnosed in the first 48 h of life. These data were collected by BRM and AF under the supervision of the study coordination. Both professionals were trained in the methodology of the project and worked in line with the infection control team of both centers.

The primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of EOHCAI defined as infections diagnosed in the first 48 h of life. Infection was defined by the presence of at least one of the following clinical manifestations that could not be explained by other known cause: fever (>38◦ C), hypothermia (<36◦ C), apnea, bradicardia, taquicardia, respiratory distress, slow peripheral perfusion, hemodynamic instability and letargy, associated with the decision of the assistant physician to start antimicrobial therapy. The secondary outcomes of the study were laboratory-confirmed EOHCAI (infections defined according to National Healthcare Safety Network, and with an etiological agent isolated from an sterile site); delivery complications (prematurity, intense bleeding and/or placenta abruption); death associated with or caused by EOHCAI (as defined by the infection control team of each center); and maternal infection (sexually transmitted infections, abnormal vaginal discharge, urinary tract infection, chorioamnionitis, pneumonia, surgical wound infection).

Statistical analysis

Data were stored in a database developed with a Microsoft bution of all variables was studied. Univariate analysis of performed using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate analyses using backwards stepwise logistic regression were performed. In these models, the dependent variable was EOHCAI. The independent variables selected for the multivariate analyses were those associated with a p-value <0.15 in the univariate analysis. Variables with a p-value ≤0.05 were kept in the final adjusted model if associated with a p-value ≤0.05, calculated by the log likelihood ratio test. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package STATA version 9.0, Texas, USA.

This project was submitted and approved by the Ethics Committees of the University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF-UFRJ) (Protocol No. 235/04) and of the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro Ethical Committee (Protocol No. 75/08).

Results

There were a total of 6443 deliveries in the two participating maternity hospitals (2460 and 3983 in each), during July 2008-February 2009, with 6502 live births (2557 and 3945 in unit 1 and 2, respectively) including twin births. Of the 824 newborns admitted to NICU/NiCU during the study period, 580 (70.4%) were included in the study. After merging neonate and maternal databases, it was possible to evaluate data for 561 neonate-mother pairs; 18 pairs were excluded because the hospitalization and the discharge date of the newborns were the same, and one due to loss of maternal records (Fig. 1). The incidence of EOHCAI was 50.5% (283/561). Considering that 6443 deliveries took place in the two units during the study, and probably all EOHCAI were admitted to NICU/NiCU, the incidence density of EOHCAI was 43.5 per 1000 live births. The incidence of laboratory confirmed EOHCAI was 2.1%; the isolated organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (two), Staphylococcus haemolyticus, S. agalactiae, viridans group Streptococci, and Streptococcus sp. (one each).

Fig. 1 -
Flowchart of the study participants.

Table 1 shows, in the univariate analysis, a statistically significant association of EOHCAI with the following variables: gestational age, birth weight, complications in labor, period of ruptured membranes, number of prenatal visits, use of antibiotic during childbirth, presence of maternal infection during hospitalization.

Table 1 -
Risk factors for early-onset neonatal healthcare associated infection (EOHCAI) - univariate analysis.

Variable	EOHCAI N = 283 (50.4%)	Without EOHCAI N = 278 (49.6%)	Relative risk	p-value
Male gender	148 (52)	152 (55)	0.95	0.57
Gestational age at birth – weeks Mean (SDa)	34.00 (3.79)	36.56 (3.42)		<0.01
Birth weight (g)
>1500	202 (71)	255 (91)
1000–1500	52 (18)	16 (5)
<1000	29 (10)	7 (2)		<0.01
PROM >18 h	95 (33)	168 (60)	1.94	<0.01
APGAR <5 on 5th min	19 (6)	19 (6)	0.98	0.97
Vaginal delivery	119 (42)	115 (41)	1.02	0.94
Neonatal Surgery	6 (2)	6 (2)	1.0	0.97
Antenatal care	259 (91)	262 (94)	0.96	0.21
Fewer than antenatal visits	182 (64)	113 (40)	1.62	<0.01
Number of pregnancies (including the studied) Mean (SDa)	1.11 (1.38)	1.06 (1.40)		0.66
Previous prematurity	40 (14)	29 (10)	1.4	0.24
Previous natimortality	13 (5)	15 (7)	0.86	0.70
Hypertension on pregnancy	65 (23)	71 (25)	0.88	0.48
Sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy	7 (2)	9 (3)	0.76	0.58
Infections in pregnancy	93 (33)	85(31)	1.07	0.50
Tobacco exposure in pregnancy	45(16)	41(15)	1.08	0.69
Alcohol exposure in pregnancy	25(9)	25(9)	0.98	0.55
Antibiotic use on antenatal care	77 (27)	81(29)	0.93	0.68
Complication during delivery	221 (78)	135 (49)	1.59	<0.01
Antibiotic use in labor/delivery	183(64)	149(53)	1.22 <0.01
Invasive procedures in the mother at the admission	8(3)	1(0.3)	8.0	<0.01
Maternal infection at the admission	78 (27)	27 (10)	2.7	<0.01
Maternal age in years Mean (SDa)	26.36 (7.14)	25.95 (6.60)		0.47
Born in Unit 1	138 (48)	65 (23)	2.0	<0.01

• ^a
  Standard deviation.

In Table 1, nine maternal invasive procedures were described at hospital admission. All of them were indwelling urinary catheter placement

Table 2 shows the results of multivariate analysis. Variables with a statistically significant association with EOHCAI were: PROM >18 h, less than six antenatal care visits, maternal infection at admission, birth weight <1000 g and 1000-1500 g, and to be born in Unit 1.

Table 2 -
Risk factors for early-onset neonatal healthcare associated infection (EOHCAI) - multivariate analysis.

Variable	ORa	p-value	95% CIb
Birth weight <1000 g	4.24	0.01	1.39–12.97
Birth weight 1000–1500 g	2.46	0.01	1.20–5.03
Birth weight >1500 g	1
Fewer than 6 antenatal visits	1.69	0.01	1.11–2.57
PROMc >18 h	1.01	<0.01	1.00–1.02
Complications during delivery	2.25	<0.01	1.44–3.55
Maternal infection at admission	3.05	<0.01	1.67–5.55
Born in Unit 1	1.41	<0.01	1.22–1.63

• ^a
  Odds ratio.
• ^b
  Confidence interval.
• ^c
  Period of ruptured membranes.

There was an important association between maternal infection at admission and EOHCAI. Chorioamnionitis (8.1%) and UTI (5.9%) were the most frequent maternal infections. There were 30 deaths: 6.0% among newborns with EOHCAI and 4.7% in the group without infection (p = 0.15). Therefore, a relationship between death and EOHCAI was not observed.

Discussion

In Brazil, the Ministry of Health guidelines recommend that pregnant women have at least six antenatal visits. Antenatal care is indeed one important means of decreasing neonatal morbidity, since proper antenatal care can decrease the risk of maternal infection, hypertension, drug use and other factors leading to prematurity, neonatal complications, and EOHCAI.^{1 , 3 , 6 , 9}

In this prospective study, carried out in two public hospitals in the city of Rio de Janeiro, a significant increase in the risk of EOHCAI was observed among neonates born to women who did not follow this recommendation. This association remained significant in a multivariate model adjusted for other established risk factors such as PROM for more than 18 h, maternal infection at labor, and low-birth weight.

The proportion of pregnant women who adhered to at least six antenatal visits in this study (38%) was much lower than the average rate of 61%, observed in Brazil in 2010. The causes of such low number of antenatal visits were not addressed in the present study, but are likely related to factors such as poor access to primary care clinics, or lack of health education to understand the importance of antenatal care to prevent maternal and neonatal complications.

Further studies are warranted to clarify this issue and to evaluate strategies to improve adherence to antenatal care in middle-income countries such as Brazil, and to analyze the impact of these strategies on EOHCAI incidence.

In line with the results of previous studies, we observed that PROM for more than 18 h, maternal infection at labor, and low-birth weight were associated with EOHCAI.^{12 - 17} Reports from the last two decades have associated maternal infections with undesirable outcomes such as premature birth, stillbirth, and fetal and neonatal infection.^{18 - 20} Moreover, infection and fetal inflammation syndrome have been implicated in the genesis of short- and long-term morbidities, such as intrauterine growth retardation, intraventricular hemorrhage, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, cerebral palsy, and chronic lung disease.^{21 , 22}

The most prevalent maternal infections in our study were chorioamnionitis and UTI, which were also important risk factors for neonatal infection. In Canada, a multicenter study conducted in two periods, 2003-2005 and 2006-2008, where 405 (6.5/1000 admissions) newborns were diagnosed with EOHCAI, maternal chorioamnionitis occurred in 26-36% of neonates with early sepsis, in the respective periods.²³ Other studies have also found an association between maternal chorioamnionitis or UTI and neonatal sepsis.^{24 - 28}

Prolonged PROM is significantly associated with the risk of maternal, fetal, and neonatal infections, as described in a nested case-control study conducted in the US in newborns with a gestational age greater than or equal to 34 weeks, in 14 hospitals in the period 1993-2007. The chance of early neonatal infection increased in parallel with the duration of ruptured membranes.²⁹

This study has some limitations that must be acknowledged. The results demonstrated a very high incidence of EOHCAI, 43.5/1000 live births. Most of these infections were based on clinical, not laboratory confirmed, and were likely overestimated. However, the same definitions were used during the whole study period, and these definitions were used not only for surveillance, but also for treatment purposes. Consequently, although overestimated, this EOHCAI incidence rate reflected the reality of neonatal care in two public hospitals in Rio de Janeiro. Have we considered only the laboratory confirmed infections, EOHCAI incidence would have been highly underestimated, probably reflecting issues related to lack of blood specimen collection and intensive maternal antibiotic use during labor and delivery.

Since neonatologists use the maternal history to assess the chance of neonatal infections, the associations between EOHCAI and PROM or maternal infections could be an assessment bias. Therefore, even if biased, this association must be studied and described, since neonates were diagnosed and treated as if they were infected, and the biological plausibility of these associations was clear. It would be impossible not to consider and adjust for these variables. However, since neonatologists were unaware to the number of ANC visits, this association should not be considered biased.

Another limitation of the study was the lack of assessment of the quality of ANC and its possible relationship with the risk of EOHCAI. Studies conducted in Brazilian municipalities of São Luis, Recife, and Rio de Janeiro evaluating the performance of ANC programs described poor quality of care, even of patients with more than six visits.^{10 , 30 , 31}

In conclusion, this was a multicenter study carried out in public hospitals, considering the mother and newborn pair, placed in the context of clinical practice in a metropolitan area of a large city in Latin America demonstrating a very high incidence of EOHCAI. Even adjusting for known perinatal risk factors, poorer ANC (less than six visits) was associated with EOHCAI. Studies to evaluate and improve the quality of ANC must be encouraged.

Acknowledgements

We received funding support for the study from the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro, grant number: E-26/110.473/2007, for Cunha AJ, and Conselho de Aperfeiçoamento do Ensino Superior (CAPES).

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Vergnano S, Sharland M, Kazembe P, Mwansambo C, Heath P. Neonatal sepsis: an international perspective. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2005;90:220-4.
• ²
  You D, New JR, Wardlaw T. Levels & trends in child mortality. Report 2012 estimates developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF); 2012.
• ³
  Lansky S, Franca E, do Carmo Leal M. Mortalidade perinatal e evitabilidade: revisao da literatura [Perinatal mortality and evitability: a review]. Rev Saude Publica. 2002;36:759-72.
• ⁴
  Ferrari LS, Brito AS, Carvalho AB, Gonzales MR. Mortalidade neonatal no Municipio de Londrina, Parana, Brasil, nos anos 1994, 1999 e 2002 [Neonatal mortality in Londrina, Parana State, Brazil, in 1994, 1999, and 2002]. Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22:1063-71.
• ⁵
  Vergnano S, Menson E, Kennea N, et al. Neonatal infections in England: the NeonIN surveillance network. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2011;96:9-14.
• ⁶
  Ministério da Saúde (Brasil). Critérios Nacionais de Infecções Relacionadas à Assistência à Saúde em Neonatologia. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA); 2008, 22 out.:10-1.
• ⁷
  Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease - revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59:1-36.
• ⁸
  Osório de Castro CGS, Pepe VLE, Luiza VL, et al. Uso indicado e uso referido de medicamentos durante a gravidez. Cad Saúde Pública. 2004;20 Suppl. 1:S73-82.
• ⁹
  Kilsztajn S, Rossbach A, do Carmo MS, Sugahara GT. Assistencia pre-natal, baixo peso e prematuridade noEstado de Sao Paulo 2000 [Prenatal care, low birth weight and prematurity in Sao Paulo State, Brazil, 2000]. Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37:303-10. PubMed PMID: 12792680.
• ¹⁰
  do Carmo Leal M, da Gama SGN, Ratto KMN, da Cunha CB. Uso do índice de Kotelchuck modificado na avaliação da assistência pré-natal e sua relação com as características maternas e o peso do recém-nascido no Município do Rio de Janeiro. Cad Saúde Pública. 2004;20 Suppl. 1:63.
• ¹¹
  Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:309-32.
• ¹²
  Puopolo KM. Epidemiology of neonatal early-onset sepsis. NeoReviews. 2008;9:571-9.
• ¹³
  Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:178-93.
• ¹⁴
  Soraisham AS, Singhal N, McMillan DD, Sauve RS, Lee SK, Canadian Neonatal Network. A multicenter study on the clinical outcome of chorioamnionitis in preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:372e1-6e.
• ¹⁵
  Rouse DJ, Landon M, Leveno KJ, et al. The maternal-fetal medicine units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:211-6.
• ¹⁶
  Mazor-Dray E, Levy A, Schlaeffer F, Sheiner E. Maternal urinary tract infection: is it independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcome? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:124-8.
• ¹⁷
  Srivastava S, Shetty N. Healthcare-associated infections in neonatal units: lessons from contrasting worlds. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65:292-306.
• ¹⁸
  Wu YW. Systematic review of chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:25-9.
• ¹⁹
  Martius JA, Roos T, Gora B, et al. Risk factors associated with early-onset sepsis in premature infants. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;85:151-8.
• ²⁰
  Buhimschi IA, Buhimschi CS. The role of proteomics in the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis and early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Perinatol. 2010;37:355-74.
• ²¹
  Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Johnson DC. Maternal infection and adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes. Clin Perinatol. 2005;32:523-59.
• ²²
  Goncalves LF, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R. Intrauterine infection and prematurity. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:3-13.
• ²³
  Sgro M, Shah PS, Campbell D, et al. Early-onset neonatal sepsis: rate and organism pattern between 2003 and 2008. J Perinatol. 2011;31:794-8.
• ²⁴
  Kuhn P, Dheu C, Bolender C, et al. Incidence and distribution of pathogens in early-onset neonatal sepsis in the era of antenatal antibiotics. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24:479-87.
• ²⁵
  Chacko B, Sohi I. Early onset neonatal sepsis. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:23-6.
• ²⁶
  Pessoa-Silva CL, Richtmann R, Calil R, et al. Healthcare-associated infections among neonates in Brazil. Infect Cont Hosp Ep. 2004;25:772-7.
• ²⁷
  Weston EJ, Pondo T, Lewis MM, et al. The burden of invasive early-onset neonatal sepsis in the United States, 2005-2008. Pediatr Infect Dis. 2011;30:937-41. PubMed PMID: 21654548.
• ²⁸
  Alexander JM, McIntire DM, Leveno KJ. Chorioamnionitis and the prognosis for term infants. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94: 274-8.
• ²⁹
  Puopolo KM, Draper D, Wi S, Newman TB, Zupancic J, Lieberman E. Estimating the probability of neonatal early-onset infection on the basis of maternal risk factors. Pediatrics. 2011;128:1155-63.
• ³⁰
  Carvalho VCP, Araujo TVB. Adequação da assistência pré-natal em gestantes atendidas em dois hospitais de referência para gravidez de alto risco do Sistema Único de Saúde, na cidade de Recife, Estado de Pernambuco. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2007;7:309-17.
• ³¹
  Coimbra LC, Silva AA, Mochel EG, et al. Factors associated with inadequacy of prenatal care utilization. Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37:456-62.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  May-Jun 2015

History

• Received
  04 Dec 2014
• Accepted
  25 Feb 2015