Quality of continuous chest compressions performed for one or two minutes

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study was designed to assess cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and rescuer fatigue when rescuers perform one or two minutes of continuous chest compressions.

METHODS:

This prospective crossover study included 148 lay rescuers who were continuously trained in a cardiopulmonary resuscitation course. The subjects underwent a 120-min training program comprising continuous chest compressions. After the course, half of the volunteers performed one minute of continuous chest compressions, and the others performed two minutes, both on a manikin model. After 30 minutes, the volunteers who had previously performed one minute now performed two minutes on the same manikin and vice versa.

RESULTS:

A comparison of continuous chest compressions performed for one and two minutes, respectively, showed that there were significant differences in the average rate of compressions per minute (121 vs. 124), the percentage of compressions of appropriate depth (76% vs. 54%), the average depth (53 vs. 47 mm), and the number of compressions with no errors (62 vs. 47%). No parameters were significantly different when comparing participants who performed regular physical activity with those who did not and participants who had a normal body mass index with overweight/obese participants.

CONCLUSION:

The quality of continuous chest compressions by lay rescuers is superior when it is performed for one minute rather than for two minutes, independent of the body mass index or regular physical activity, even if they are continuously trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. It is beneficial to rotate rescuers every minute when performing continuous chest compressions to provide higher quality and to achieve greater success in assisting a victim of cardiac arrest.

Hands-Only CPR; Continuous Chest Compression; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Fatigue; Basic Life Support

INTRODUCTION

Continuous chest compressions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCC-CPR, or hands-only CPR) has been advocated as an alternative to conventional CPR (30 compressions/two ventilations) (¹-⁴). In the 2010 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) CPR guidelines for resuscitation (⁵), CCC-CPR was recommended as an alternative method and was encouraged for untrained rescuers. Animal (⁶-⁸) and clinical (⁹-¹¹) investigations have shown that CCC-CPR is at least as effective as conventional CPR in terms of survival rates and neurological outcomes. Because CCC-CPR does not include ventilation, it is easier to learn and remember than conventional CPR; thus, it is especially useful for lay people (¹,¹²,¹³). In most cases, the fundamentals of a functional chain of survival are built by lay people (¹⁴); approximately 67% of sudden cardiac deaths are witnessed by bystanders, and the Emergency Medical Services response interval is eight minutes or longer (¹⁵). A flowchart with the current recommendations for cardiac support (¹⁶) is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1
Current recommendations for cardiac support (Basic Life Support).

Although the performance of hands-only CPR has some advantages, its quality (depth, rate, total number of compressions) decreases over time (¹⁷-¹⁹). This may be primarily due to rescuer fatigue. Current guidelines (¹⁶,²⁰,²¹) recommend the rotation of rescuers every two minutes when performing conventional CPR or CCC-CPR. Because CCC-CPR may be more physically demanding than conventional CPR, the current rotation strategy recommended by the guidelines may be inappropriate for hands-only CPR (¹⁹,²²,²³).

Therefore, we hypothesized that the quality of CCC-CPR is better when performed for one minute than when performed for two minutes. This study aims to evaluate the quality of CCC-CPR performed on a manikin for one or two minutes by trained lay rescuers.

METHODS

Study Design

This study was a prospective, randomized crossover study. This design was chosen to identify differences in the performance of one or two minutes of CCC-CPR by each subject. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Foundation School of Medicine (registration number: 124.963).

Subjects and Materials

Lay rescuers who were continuously trained in the Heartsaver AED¯ course of the American Heart Association were recruited between April 2012 and June 2012 to participate in this study, and 160 lay rescuers agreed to participate. These individuals worked as security guards for a company that has provided them with CPR courses since 2008. They complete the Heartsaver AED¯ course at least every two years, and most of them had participated in the care of cardiac arrest victims in their jobs.

Data collection included an identification questionnaire, the Laerdal Resusci Anne Skill Reporter manikin (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway), a body weight measure, a height scale, a tape measure, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire.

Study Protocol

All lay rescuers underwent a 120-min training program in CCC-CPR based on the 2010 guidelines. After training, the participants were randomly distributed into two groups: the first group performed CCC-CPR for one minute (CCC-CPR 1 min), and the second group performed CCC-CPR for two minutes (CCC-CPR 2 min). After 30 minutes of this session, the volunteers who had performed one minute of CCC-CPR subsequently performed two minutes, and vice versa. Immediately after each compression session, the volunteers answered the VAS questionnaire. A flowchart of the study is shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2
Flow diagram of the study.

The students were instructed to deliver only chest compressions without ventilation, initial rhythm assessment, or a pulse check. CPR was not performed using a metronome. One researcher monitored the Resusci Anne Skill Reporter manikin, which was positioned on the floor. None of the students received feedback, and they were told that they could stop if they were too tired to continue.

Each participant completed a brief questionnaire comprising demographic information (age, gender, body weight, height, performance of regular physical activity) as well as the participant's prior number of CPR training courses and the number of CPR procedures he or she had performed on the job.

Performance Data and Skill Assessment

Observations of the resuscitation simulations were recorded by the Resusci Anne manikin Skill Reporter. The parameters that were considered correct were based on the 2010 ERC guidelines for adults: a rate of at least 100 compressions per minute with a compression depth of at least 5 cm at the lower third of the sternum.

A compression with adequate depth was defined as ≥ 5 cm, as registered by the skill-report system, in accordance with the 2010 guidelines. A mean compression depth of greater than 38 mm is associated with better outcomes in ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest based on clinical evidence (²⁴) and current guidelines (²⁰,²¹); the compression depth was also evaluated.

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from the subject's height and weight, and the subjects were classified as obese/overweight (BMI ≥ 25.00), normal (BMI 18.50-24.99), or underweight (BMI < 18.50), according to the World Health Organization's international category guidance (²⁵).

Regular physical activity was considered aerobic activity performed at least 30 minutes per day at least three times per week. We also correlated the results with whether the subjects practiced regular physical activity and with the participants' BMI. For this analysis, we considered the following parameters: average rate, percentage of compressions with adequate depth, percentage of compressions with a depth greater than 38 mm, and correct hand positioning.

A VAS questionnaire (²⁶,²⁷) was administered immediately after each compression session to obtain the degree of fatigue on a scale from 1 (no fatigue) to 10 (extreme fatigue).

Statistical Methods

Quantitative values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared using two-sided paired or unpaired Student t tests or Wilcoxon signed rank or Mann-Whitney U tests for non-Gaussian distributions. Categorical variables were analyzed by chi-square or Fisher's exact test. SPSS statistics software (version 19.0, Armonk, NY, IBM Corp) was used for all statistical analyses. The sample size was not planned. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

General Characteristics

Seven subjects of the 160 volunteers were excluded because of insufficient data (four did not provide a VAS score, one did not perform CCC-CPR for one minute, and two did not perform CCC-CPR for two minutes). Two of the remaining 153 participants did not complete the 120-min training program for CCC-CPR, and three were underweight and were therefore excluded. As a result, 148 lay rescuers were included as subjects in this study. The general characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Baseline data for the study participants.

Characteristics	Data
Gender (n)	148
Male	125
Female	23
Average age (years)	40.81 ± 10.38
Average height (cm)	174 ± 8
Average weight (kg)	81.59 ± 14.26
Average BMI (kg/m2)	26.80 ± 3.99
Average number of CPR training sessions attended before the study	2.89 ± 1.26
Average number of real resuscitation attempts before the study	0.72 ± 0.85

Continuous Chest Compression Quality for One or Two Minutes

Comparing the continuous chest compressions performed for one or two minutes, the average rate (compressions/minute), the mean percentage of compressions with adequate depth, the average depth (mm), the mean percentage of compressions with insufficient depth, and the mean percentage of compressions with no errors showed significant differences (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean percentages of the duty cycle, compressions > 38 mm and compressions with correct hand positioning (see Table 2).

Table 2
Chest compression continuously performed for one and two minutes.

Compression characteristics	CCC-CPR 1 min	CCC-CPR 2 min	P value
Average rate (compressions/min)	121.0 ± 13.01	124.09 ± 11.71	0.003
Adequate depth (%)	76.21 ± 35.31	54.34 ± 40.05	< 0.001
Average depth (mm)	53.59 ± 7.48	47.70 ± 7.68	< 0.001
Depth > 38 mm (%)	95.27 ± 21.30	89.86 ± 30.28	0.119
No error (%)	62.04 ± 38.54	47.79 ± 39.10	< 0.001
Average duty cycle (%)	44.93 ± 5.58	45.66 ± 5.97	0.061
Correct hand position (%)	87.08 ± 30.57	91.06 ± 23.91	0.140

Fatigue Analysis

We used a VAS scored immediately after each performance to evaluate fatigue. The VAS was 1.99 ± 1.09 for one minute of CCC-CPR and 4.56 ± 1.68 for two minutes of CCC-CPR (p < 0.001).

Other Analyses of the Quality of Continuous Chest Compressions

Among the participants, 57 (39%) practiced regular physical activity, and 91 (61%) did not. An analysis of the correlation of the compression data with the regular practice of physical activity is presented in Table 3.

Table 3
Quality of chest compressions performed for one and two minutes in relation to the practice of regular physical activity.

Compression characteristics	1 min	2 min	p-valueb
Average rate
Practicing	118.70 ± 11.3	122.82 ± 11.5	0.009
Not practicing	122.63 ± 13.8	124.88 ± 11.7	0.111
p-valuea	0.062	0.299
Adequate depth (%)
Practicing	77.64 ± 33.8	55.63 ± 42.4	< 0.001
Not practicing	75.89 ± 36.1	53.54 ± 38.6	< 0.001
p-valuea	0.766	0.763
Depth > 38 mm (%)
Practicing	96.49 ± 18.5	91.23 ± 28.5	0.182
Not practicing	94.51 ± 22.9	89.01 ± 31.4	0.095
p-valuea	0.577	0.659
Correct hand position (%)
Practicing	87.91 ±30.0	87.38 ± 29.0	0.894
Not practicing	86.56 ± 31.0	93.36 ± 19.9	0.057
p-valuea	0.792	0.174
VAS (points)
Practicing	1.98 ± 0.93	7.19 ± 1.6	< 0.001
Not practicing	2.0 ± 0.8	7.40 ± 1.4	< 0.001
p-valuea	0.908	0.417

• aDifferences between subjects who practice regular physical activity and those who do not.
• bDifferences between one and two minutes of CCC-CPR.

Among the participants, a group of 56 (38%) had a normal BMI. The other group was composed of 65 (44%) participants who were overweight, 20 (13%) who had class I obesity, and 7 (5%) who had class II obesity, for a total of 92 (62%) of the lay rescuers. An analysis of the compression data correlated with the BMI is shown in Table 4.

Table 4
Quality of chest compressions performed for one and two minutes in relation to the body mass index of the participants.

Compression characteristics	1 min	2 min	p-valueb
Average rate
Normal	121.18 ± 12.8	123.73 ± 11.6	0.246
Overweight/obese	121.08 ± 13.2	124.30 ± 11.8	0.022
p-valuea	0.962	0.773
Adequate depth (%)
Normal	74.81 ± 36.7	51.85 ± 40.2	0.001
Overweight/obese	77.63 ± 34.3	55.86 ± 40.0	< 0.001
p-valuea	0.643	0.557
Depth > 38 mm (%)
Normal	91.07 ± 28.7	91.07 ± 28.7	> 0.999
Overweight/obese	97.83 ± 14.6	89.13 ± 32.6	0.020
p-valuea	0.107	0.701
Correct hand position (%)
Normal	93.47 ±22.4	89.45 ± 27.3	0.421
Overweight/obese	83.19 ± 34.1	92.03 ± 21.6	0.023
p-valuea	0.028	0.599
VAS (points)
Normal	1.98 ± 0.93	7.21 ± 1.6	< 0.001
Overweight/obese	2.0 ± 0.8	7.39 ± 1.4	< 0.001
p-valuea	0.908	0.501

• aDifferences between subjects who practice regular physical activity and those who do not.
• bDifferences between one and two minutes of CCC-CPR.

DISCUSSION

The quality of CPR plays a crucial role in reducing patient mortality rates (¹⁶,²⁰,²¹). Fewer pauses and better chest compression quality are thought to improve overall survival following cardiac arrest (²¹,²⁸). However, rescuer fatigue can degrade the quality of compressions (¹⁹,²²,²⁹), particularly when performing hands-only CPR (²³). CCC-CPR by lay bystanders has been recommended by several studies (³⁰-³³) and by the American Heart Association (AHA) (²¹) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) (²⁰) to increase bystander CPR rates. Based on these factors, we evaluated the effects of one or two minutes of CCC-CPR performed by periodically trained lay rescuers.

In the present study, a substantial effect of the compression rate or correct hand placement was not shown for either CCC-CPR group. We observed that the two-minute CCC-CPR group performed compressions at a higher frequency than the one-minute CCC-CPR group. This may have occurred to compensate for the decrease in depth to avoid deteriorating the quality of compressions. Comparing the depth parameters of the compressions, one minute of CCC-CPR was more effective than two minutes of CCC-CPR, similarly to the findings of previous studies (¹⁸,¹⁹,²²,²³,³⁴,³⁵). Unlike other studies, this protocol considered compressions with adequate depth to be those of at least 5 cm, as proposed by current guidelines. Thus, although the one-minute CCC-CPR group performed better on this parameter, only 75.23% achieved compressions with adequate depth, indicating that this is difficult to achieve even among continuously trained participants. When considering compressions deeper than 38 cm, we observed that 95% of the participants were able to achieve this parameter for one minute, maintaining quality compressions for nearly the entire one-minute cycle. This finding reinforces that continuous CPR training provides good quality chest compressions.

Fatigue, as measured by the VAS, was very low in the one-minute CCC-CPR group, and a significant difference was observed compared with the two-minute CCC-CPR group. Therefore, one minute of CCC-CPR appears to reduce rescuer fatigue and to increase CPR quality. Regardless of whether individuals practiced regular physical activity, the depth performance was the same during one or two minutes. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has compared the quality of CCC performed by lay rescuers who practice regular physical activity. However, highly fit rescuers are known to perform good-quality CPR, as noted in a study of rescuer lifeguards (³⁶).

Hong (³⁴) and Sayee (³⁷), found significant differences in the parameters of quality chest compressions when comparing individuals with normal BMI with overweight/obese individuals. However, in our study, individuals with differing BMIs performed compressions of better depth for one minute than for two minutes.

The present study has some limitations. First, this study used a manikin. A compression graded “adequate” by Resusci Anne may not correlate with a clinically effective compression, and the rescuer's attitude during a simulated situation may differ from an actual cardiac arrest. Second, most of the participants were male; thus, they may have been more physically fit and had greater strength than the average bystander or spouse at home. These differences may have affected the results. Most importantly, although further clinical and animal studies are needed to clarify some points, this study showed better results for CCC-CPR performed for one minute than CCC-CPR performed for two minutes.

The quality of CCC-CPR is superior when performed by lay rescuers for one minute rather than for two minutes; this result is independent of BMI or regular physical activity, even if the rescuers are continuously trained in CPR. Thus, it is beneficial to rotate rescuers every minute when performing CCC-CPR to provide higher quality and to achieve greater success in assisting victims of cardiac arrest. The main parameter that requires improvement is the depth of compressions, reinforcing the need for devices that measure the depth of chest compressions during CPR maneuvers.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Ewy GA. Cardiocerebral resuscitation: the new cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 2005;111(16):2134-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000162503.57657.FA.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000162503.57657.FA
• ²
  Bobrow BJ, Spaite DW, Berg RA, Stolz U, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Chest compression-only CPR by lay rescuers and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2010;304(13):1447-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1392.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1392
• ³
  Kitamura T, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Nagao K, Tanaka H, Nadkarni VM, et al. Conventional and chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders for children who have out- of-hospital cardiac arrests: a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2010;375(9723):1347-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60064-5.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60064-5
• ⁴
  Ong ME, Ng FS, Anushia P, Tham LP, Leong BS, Ong VY, et al. Comparison of chest compression only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore. Resuscitation. 2008;78(2):119-26, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.03.012.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.03.012
• ⁵
  Deakin CD, Nolan JP, Soar J, Sunde K, Koster RW, Smith GB, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2010;81(10):1305-52.
• ⁶
  Berg RA, Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg MD, Sanders AB, Otto CW, et al. Assisted ventilation does not improve outcome in a porcine model of single-rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 1997;95(6):1635-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.95.6.1635.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.95.6.1635
• ⁷
  Ewy GA, Zuercher M, Hilwig RW, Sanders AB, Berg RA, Otto CW, et al. Improved neurological outcome with continuous chest compressions compared with 30:2 compressions-to-ventilations cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2007;116(22):2525-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.711820.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.711820
• ⁸
  Xanthos T, Karatzas T, Stroumpoulis K, Lelovas P, Simitsis P, Vlachos I, et al. Continuous chest compressions improve survival and neurologic outcome in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(8):1389-94.
• ⁹
  Bohm K, Rosenqvist M, Herlitz J, Hollenberg J, Svensson L. Survival is similar after standard treatment and chest compression only in out-of-hospital bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2007;116(25):2908-12.
• ¹⁰
  Rea TD, Fahrenbruch C, Culley L, Donohoe RT, Hambly C, Innes J, et al. CPR with chest compression alone or with rescue breathing. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):423-33.
• ¹¹
  Hupfl M, Selig HF, Nagele P. Chest-compression-only versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;376(9752):1552-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61454-7.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61454-7
• ¹²
  Sayre MR, Berg RA, Cave DM, Page RL, Potts J, White RD. American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Hands-only (compression-only) cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a call to action for bystander response to adults who experience out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: a science advisory for the public from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Circulation. 2008;117(16):2162-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.189380.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.189380
• ¹³
  Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Ando M, Yonemoto N, Hiraide A, et al. Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training for the general public: a randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2008;79(1):90-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.05.009.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.05.009
• ¹⁴
  Muller D, Agrawal R, Arntz HR. How sudden is sudden cardiac death? Circulation. 2006;114(11):1146-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.616318.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.616318
• ¹⁵
  van Alem AP, Vrenken RH, de Vos R, Tijssen JG, Koster RW. Use of automated external defibrillator by first responders in out of hospital cardiac arrest: prospective controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;327(7427):1312-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1312.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1312
• ¹⁶
  Gonzalez MM, Timerman S, Gianotto-Oliveira R, Polastri TF, Canesin MF, Lage SG, et al. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. I Diretriz de Ressuscitação Cardiopulmonar e Cuidados Cardiovasculares de Emergência da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;101(2 Suppl 3):1-221, http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.2013S006.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.2013S006
• ¹⁷
  Min MK, Yeom SR, Ryu JH, Kim YI, Park MR, Han SK, et al. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model. Resuscitation. 2013;84(9):1279-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.035.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.035
• ¹⁸
  Ashton A, McCluskey A, Gwinnutt CL, Keenan AM. Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min. Resuscitation. 2002;55(2):151-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00168-5.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00168-5
• ¹⁹
  Hightower D, Thomas SH, Stone CK, Dunn K, March JA. Decay in quality of closed- chest compressions over time. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(3):300-3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70076-5.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70076-5
• ²⁰
  Koster RW, Baubin MA, Bossaert LL, Caballero A, Cassan P, Castrén M, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation. 2010;81(10):1277-92.
• ²¹
  Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, Aufderheide TP, Cave DM, Hazinski MF, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):685-705, http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970939.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970939
• ²²
  Ochoa FJ, Ramalle-Gomara E, Lisa V, Saralegui I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation. 1998;37(3):149-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00057-4.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00057-4
• ²³
  Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Ando M, Yonemoto N, Hiraide A, et al. Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compressions-only CPR and conventional CPR. Resuscitation. 2010;81(9):1152-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.008.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.008
• ²⁴
  Edelson DP, Abella BS, Kramer-Johansen J, Wik L, Myklebust H, Barry AM, et al. Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2006;71(2):137-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.008.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.008
• ²⁵
  World Health Organization. The international classification of adult underweight, overweight and obesity according to BMI. Accessed 25 April 2013, at (http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?).
  » (http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?).
• ²⁶
  Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990;16(Suppl 1):55-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1815.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1815
• ²⁷
  Grant S, Aitchison T, Henderson E, Christie J, Zare S, McMurray J, et al. A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. Chest. 1999;116(5):1208-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.116.5.1208.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.116.5.1208
• ²⁸
  ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2005;112(24 Suppl):IV1e203.
• ²⁹
  Sugerman NT, Herzberg D, Leary M, Weidman EK, Herzberg DL, Vanden Hoek TL, et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation. 2009;80(9):981-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.002.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.002
• ³⁰
  Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3(1):63-81.
• ³¹
  Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW, Hedges J, Powell JL, Aufderheide TP, et al. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA 2008;300(12):1423-31.
• ³²
  Lund-Kordahl I, Olasveengen TM, Lorem T, Samda lM, Wik L, Sunde K. Improving outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by strengthening weak links of the local Chain of Survival; quality of advanced life support and post-resuscitation care. Resuscitation. 2010;81(4):422-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.020.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.020
• ³³
  Koster RW, Sayre MR, Botha M, Cave DM, Cudnik MT, Handley AJ, et al. Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation 2010;81(Suppl 1):e48-70.
• ³⁴
  Hong DY, Parka SO, Lee KR, Baek KJ, Shin DH. A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: A randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis. Resuscitation. 2012;83(3):353-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.006.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.006
• ³⁵
  Odegaard S, Saether E, Steen PA, Wik L. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compressions: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30: 2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins. Resuscitation. 2006;71(3):335-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.012.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.012
• ³⁶
  Barcala-Furelos R, Abelairas-Gomez C, Romo-Perez V, Palacios-Aguilar J. Effect of physical fatigue on the quality CPR: a water rescue study of lifeguards physical fatigue and quality CPR in a water rescue. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(3):473-7.
• ³⁷
  Sayee N, McCluskey D. Factors Influencing Performance of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) by Foundation Year 1 Hospital Doctors. Ulster Med J. 2012;81(1):14-8.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Mar 2015

History

• Received
  3 Sept 2014
• Reviewed
  14 Dec 2014
• Accepted
  5 Jan 2015