Abstract
Insofar as that morality is established from the recognition of universal conditions for the general welfare, the “kantian philocrat” is distinguished by the impersonality of his actions, by obedience to the norm and the internalization of the responsibility in order to favoring “reason” and “universality” as regulative principles of actions and values. Considering nihilism as “disease of the will”, the Nietzschean dominator-type should instead affirm the unique features of his personality. On overcoming the reactive nihilism, the dominator’s typology in Nietzsche dictates another philocrat possibility, unpredictable and non-normative.
Keywords
Nietzsche; Kant; Typology; Morals