Fractura de la columna toracolumbar del tipo explosión: correlación entre cifosis y resultado clínico del tratamiento

coluna Coluna/Columna Coluna/Columna 1808-1851 2177-014X Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna OBJETIVO: Evaluar la correlación entre la cifosis debido a fractura del tipo explosión de la columna torácica y lumbar y el resultado clínico en pacientes sometidos a tratamiento conservador o quirúrgico. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo, transversal con 29 pacientes con fracturas de la columna torácica y lumbar del tipo explosión tratados por el Grupo de Columna Vertebral de un hospital de referencia en traumas entre los años 2002 y 2011. Los pacientes fueron seguidos en ambulatorio por un mínimo de 24 meses. Todos los casos fueron evaluados clínicamente por los cuestionarios Oswestry, calidad de vida SF-36 y escala visual analógica (VAS) del dolor. También fueron sometidos a evaluación radiográfica y por TC de la columna lumbosacra, en el momento de la hospitalización y durante el seguimiento ambulatorio por el método de Cobb para medir el grado de cifosis. RESULTADOS: No hubo correlación estadísticamente significativa entre el grado de cifosis inicial y el resultado clínico medido por EVA y la mayoría de los dominios del SF-36, en ambos pacientes tratados conservadoramente y tratados quirúrgicamente. El cuestionario Oswestry mostró beneficios para los pacientes que recibieron tratamiento conservador (p = 0,047) en comparación con el tratamiento quirúrgico (p=0,335). El análisis de la diferencia entre la cifosis inicial y final y cifosis definitiva aislada en relación con el resultado clínico no mostró correlación estadística en ninguna de las puntuaciones utilizadas. CONCLUSIÓN: El resultado clínico del tratamiento de las fracturas del tipo explosión de columna torácica y lumbar no fue influenciado por un mayor o menor grado de cifosis inicial o residual, independientemente del tratamiento. INTRODUCTION Most spinal fractures occur between T11 and L4, and around 14% to 17% are classified as the burst type. The susceptibility of this region is due to the loss of stabilization caused by the ribs and chest muscles, the transition between kyphotic thoracic and lordotic lumbar curvature, and the change in facet joint orientation, from coronal in the thoracic spine, to sagittal in the lumbar spine. 1 Burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine have a causal mechanism, which is axial compression on the vertebral body. Their radiological characteristics are retropulsion of bone fragment into the inside of the spinal canal and increased interpedicular distance. This type of fracture can be associated with varying degrees of traumatic spinal stenosis, vertebral body collapse, and local kyphosis. The thoracolumbar transition region is the most commonly affected site, ranging from 10% to 45% of cases. 2 - 4 The most commonly used classification for burst thoracic and lumbar spine fractures is currently the one initially described by Magerl et al 5 and recently modified by Vaccaro et al 6 This classification, which is adopted by the AO group, classifies fractures as subtypes A3 and A4. The degree of local kyphosis presented by the fracture is used as an important factor for defining the therapeutic approach. In addition, some patients with burst fractures may develop progressive mechanical instability, with increased kyphosis, chronic dorsolumbar pain and neurological sequelae. 7 Therefore, its treatment is widely discussed and still remains controversial. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between initial and final traumatic kyphosis and clinical outcome, in patients submitted to conservative and surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted with 29 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated by the Spine Group of a trauma reference hospital, between 2002 and 2011. It should be emphasized that only patients with normal neurological function were selected (Frankel E). 8 The patients included in this study were observed in an outpatient setting, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. All cases were clinically evaluated during follow-up, with the Short-Form 36 (SF 36) 9 quality of life questionnaire was used in the validated version in Portuguese. The Oswestry10 questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) of pain were also applied. Upon admission to hospital, all the patients underwent anteroposterior and lateral radiographic examinations of the spine, as well as a computed tomography (CT) scan in axial, sagittal and coronal sections. During outpatient follow-up, anteroposterior and lateral spinal x-rays were routinely performed. All these tests were made available for research, through the Medical Archive and Statistics Service (SAME) of the aforementioned institution. The research project was authorized by the Ethics Committee of the University of Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil, under opinion number 682.269. The fractures were classified as burst, according to the criteria described by Vaccaro et al, 6 which subdivides these lesions into subgroups A3 and A4. The measurement of initial post-traumatic and follow-up kyphosis was performed according to the Cobb11 method, using the upper and lower vertebra adjacent to the fractured vertebra in lateral x-ray. Of the 29 patients assessed, 14 underwent surgical treatment and 15 conservative treatment. It should be emphasized that the criteria adopted for the indication of surgical treatment, in cases where neurological function was normal, was kyphosis greater than 30°, collapse of the vertebral body greater than 50%, or narrowing of the spinal canal greater than 50%. Some polytraumatized patients who did not meet the above criteria were also treated surgically, due to the need for early mobilization, in order to minimize the risk of thromboembolic events and lung infections. Patients treated surgically underwent arthrodesis with instrumentation on the vertebrae adjacent to the fracture, and patients submitted to conservative treatment used a Jewett brace for a period of 4 to 6 months. For statistical analysis of this study, a significance level of 0.05 (α = 5%) was considered, and descriptive levels (p) below this value were considered significant and represented by p <0.05. The Mann-Whitney test, Spearman correlation analysis, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were applied. Version 22.0 of the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) program was used for the analysis, and to obtain the results. RESULTS The results were obtained according to: (a) demographic data; (b) relationship between initial kyphosis and clinical outcome; (c) relationship between final kyphosis and clinical outcome (d) relationship between mean initial and final kyphosis, and clinical outcome. Demographic data: Twenty-two patients were male (75.9%) and seven were female (24.1%). As regards the etiology of the trauma responsible for the fracture, falls from a height were found to be the cause in 22 (75.9%) cases, traffic accidents in 5 (17.2%), and direct trauma in just 2 (6.9%) cases. In terms of the affected spinal segment, most cases occurred at the thoracolumbar transition (T12-L1), with 16 (55.2%) cases. There were 11 (37.9%) cases in the lumbar region (L2 to L5) and only 2 (6.9%) cases in the thoracic region (T1 to T11). As regards the recommended treatment, of the 29 patients studied, 14 (48.3%) were treated surgically and 15 (51.7%) conservatively. The average age at trauma was 46.52 years (median 48), ranging from 22 to 69 years. b) The relationship between initial kyphosis and clinical outcome: Mean initial kyphosis in the patients treated conservatively was 11.3°, ranging from -10° to 28°. In the surgical treatment, mean initial kyphosis was 14.71°, ranging from -4° to 35°. Therefore, no statistically significant difference was observed between the mean initial kyphosis of patients treated conservatively and surgically (p=0.446). There was no statistically significant relationship between the degree of initial kyphosis and clinical outcome measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain in both the patients treated conservatively (p = 0.146) and those treated surgically (p=0.503). The clinical outcome assessed by the Oswestry questionnaire was better for the patients treated conservatively (p=0.047) than for those treated surgically (p=0.335). It should also be emphasized that there was no statistically significant relationship between the degree of initial kyphosis and clinical outcome, represented by most of the domains of the SF-36 questionnaire, regardless of the recommended treatment. The relationship between the degree of initial kyphosis and the limitation due to physical aspects (p=0.017) and mental health (p=0.039) domains was statistically significant only in relation to conservative treatment, i.e., the clinical outcome was superior, in these domains, with conservative treatment. (Table 1) Table 1 Correlation between initial kyphosis and subdivisions of SF-36, VAS and Oswestry. Variables Treatment Surgical p Conservative p SF36 Domains Functional capacity 0.394 0.163 -0.405 0.134 Limitations due to physical problems -0.217 0.456 -0.603* 0.017 Pain 0.366 0.198 -0.362 0.185 General state of health -0.228 0.433 -0.195 0.487 Vitality 0.254 0.381 -0.398 0.142 Social aspects -0.298 0.302 -0.197 0.481 Limitations due to emotional aspects 0.190 0.515 -0.312 0.257 Mental health -0.365 0.200 -0.536 0.039 OSWESTRY -0.278 0.335 0.519* 0.047 VAS 0.196 0.503 0.394 0.146 The correlation is significant when p=0.05 c) Relationship between final kyphosis and clinical outcome: The mean final kyphosis, in the patients treated conservatively, was 17.87°, ranging from -1° to 40°. In the surgical treatment, mean final kyphosis was 16.57°, ranging from -6° to 36°. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the mean final kyphosis of the patients treated conservatively and surgically (p=0.773). (Figure 1) Figure 1 Mean final kyphosis (in follow-up) (p = 0.05). There was no statistically significant relationship between the degree of final kyphosis and clinical outcome measured by the VAS scale, both in the patients treated conservatively (p = 0.403) and in those treated surgically (p = 0.671). Regardless of the recommended treatment, clinical outcome, evaluated using the Oswestry questionnaire, presented no statistically significant difference between the patients treated conservatively (p=0.215) and surgically (p=0.450). It should be also emphasized that there was no statistically significant relationship between the degree of final kyphosis and clinical outcome, represented by all the SF-36 domains, regardless of the recommended treatment. (Table 2) Table 2 Correlation between final kyphosis and subdivisions of SF-36, VAS and Oswestry. Variables Treatment Surgical p Conservative p SF36 Domains Functional capacity 0.248 0.392 -0.410 0.129 Limitations due to physical problems -0.140 0.632 -0.402 0.137 Pain 0.240 0.240 -0.279 0.315 General state of health -0.228 0.433 -0.160 0.568 Vitality 0.104 0.724 -0.353 0.197 Social aspects -0.318 0.267 -0.218 0.434 Limitations due to emotional aspects 0.311 0.280 -0.187 0.505 Mental health -0.157 0.592 -0.497 0.060 OSWESTRY -0.220 0.450 0.340 0.215 VAS 0.125 0.671 0.233 0.403 *The correlation is significant when p=0.05 Relationship between mean initial and final kyphosis and clinical outcome: In the radiographic evaluation, there was a statistical difference between the values of initial kyphosis and final kyphosis in the patients treated conservatively (p=0.008). In the patients treated surgically. However, this relationship was not evidenced (p=0.489). (Figure 2) Figure 2 Initial and final kyphosis in the different treatments (p = 0.05). The mean difference between initial and final kyphosis, in the patients treated conservatively, was 6.53°, ranging from -10° to 16°. In surgical treatment, the mean kyphosis difference was 1.86°, ranging from -12° to 17°. Therefore, a statistically significant difference was verified between the mean kyphosis difference of the patients treated conservatively and surgically (p=0.057). (Figure 3) Figure 3 Mean kyphosis difference (p = 0.05). There was no statistically significant relationship between the degree of difference between initial and final kyphosis and clinical outcome measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, both in the patients treated conservatively (p=0.558) and in those treated surgically (p = 0.610). Clinical outcome, assessed by the Oswestry questionnaire, showed no statistically significant difference for both the patients treated conservatively (p=0.578) and those treated surgically (p=0.608), when the difference between initial and final kyphosis was evaluated. There was no statistically significant relationship between the kyphosis difference and clinical outcome, represented by the SF-36 domains, regardless of the treatment administered (p>0.05). (Table 3) Table 3 Correlation between the difference of kyphosis and subdivisions of SF-36, VAS and Oswestry. Variables Treatment Surgical p Conservative p SF36 Domains Functional capacity -0.306 0.288 -0.142 0.614 Limitations due to physical problems 0.163 0.578 0.168 0.549 Pain -0.269 0.352 0.034 0.904 General state of health 0.052 0.859 -0.001 0.997 Vitality -0.279 0.334 -0.048 0.866 Social aspects 0.038 0.897 -0.103 0.715 Limitations due to emotional aspects 0.133 0.650 0.126 0.654 Mental health 0.390 0.169 -0.103 0.715 OSWESTRY 0.150 0.608 -0.156 0.578 VAS -0.149 0.610 -0.164 0.558 The correlation is significant when p=0.05 DISCUSSION The treatment of burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine in literature is controversial. In general, surgical treatment is proposed for patients with associated neurological damage. The remaining doubt relates to the conduct to be applied for the patient to exhibit normal neurological function. Should we classify this fracture as unstable in order to justify a surgical indication? We must remember that exclusively bone-related instability, resulting from acute trauma, ceases to exist after fracture consolidation. The severity of burst fractures without associated neurological deficit, could manifest through the comminution of the fractured vertebral body, the presence of lamina fracture, increased kyphosis, or the collapse and narrowing of the spinal canal caused by the bone fragments from the fracture. 12 , 13 But could the increase in local kyphosis, or its continuation after acute trauma, be related to the end result of the treatment? Observational studies in patients with burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine and normal neurological function have shown no difference in long-term functional outcomes, regardless of the type of treatment. 14 - 16 Authors who advocate surgical treatment justify it by the good results obtained, the shorter hospitalization time, early mobility, better correction of kyphosis, and the possibility of direct decompression of the spinal canal, which would prevent a possible late neurological deterioration. 17 - 18 In a prospective randomized study, Wood et al 19 compared the outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment in 47 patients with burst thoracolumbar fracture (24 treated surgically and 23 with orthesis or plaster cast). Radiographic analysis showed similar results in relation to kyphosis (mean 12.9° upon admission and 17.2° in follow-up). In our analysis, mean initial kyphosis in patients treated conservatively was 11.3°, and in follow-up, 17.9°, while mean initial kyphosis in the patients treated surgically was 14.7°, and in follow-up, 16.6°. The average progression of the deformity found in the study by Avanzi et al, 20 which assessed 17 patients for 34.7 months, ranging from 15-118 months, was 1.8°. In their retrospective study, Tropiano et al 21 assessed 41 patients treated conservatively with hyperextension plaster cast, and reported mean initial kyphosis of 3.4° and mean final kyphosis of 4.6°, showing a mean increase in the deformity of 1.2°. After conservative treatment of 20 patients with orthoses, Cantor et al 22 reported 19° initial kyphosis, 20° final kyphosis and 1° mean progression of deformity, while Chow et al, 23 in their case series of 24 patients treated conservatively with plaster cast or orthoses, reported mean progression of deformity of 2.3°, with initial kyphosis of 5.3° and final kyphosis of 7.6°. Shen et al, 24 in their study with 38 patients treated with orthoses, reported initial kyphosis of 20° and final kyphosis of 24°, presenting mean deformity progression of 4°. A similar result was verified by Mumford et al, 25 in which the mean deformity progression was 3.87°, with initial kyphosis of 16.24° and final kyphosis of 20.12°. Even after a long follow-up of up to 41 years, Moller et al 26 found results similar to those of other authors, reporting initial kyphosis of 15.4° and final kyphosis of 18.5°, evidencing mean deformity progression of 3.1°. To compare, the radiographic evaluation of our series showed results similar to those of other authors, with mean kyphosis progression of 6.54°, mean initial kyphosis of 11.33°, and final kyphosis of 17.87°. Comparing the radiographic findings with the outcome of the recommended treatment, few studies are found in the literature. Andress et al, 27 in a study with a retrospective series of 50 patients with burst fracture, treated surgically, failed to demonstrate a relationship between the radiographic findings and the functional outcomes with regards to pain reported by the patients, in the long term. Likewise, Lakshmanan et al, 28 attempted to correlate the recurrence of kyphosis and its functional implications in 26 patients treated surgically. No statistical relationship could be found. In another study, of the meta analysis type, Gnanenthiran et al 29 evaluated four clinical trials on the treatment of burst thoracolumbar fracture, totaling 79 patients (41 with surgical treatment and 38 with conservative treatment). The average follow-up ranged from 24-118 months. They found differences between the groups in relation to improvement of kyphosis, in the operated group. However, surgical treatment did not show any superiority in relation to pain and rate of return to work. They concluded, therefore, that surgical treatment of burst thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit can improve residual kyphosis, but does not improve pain, besides being associated with higher rates of complications and costs. Yi et al 30, in another meta-analysis, found similar results. In our series, we found no statistically significant results, when correlating the radiographic findings with the clinical outcome (SF-36, Oswestry and VAS). With regards the standardization of treatment to be established in this type of injury, it is suggested that a greater number of studies be conducted. However, these should be prospective, with larger samples, and with a selection protocol that allows the inclusion of patients with more equivalent injuries. Until then, the desire of the spinal surgeon to devise a better definition of therapeutic conduct will continue, also requiring common sense and the individualization of each case at the time of indicating treatment. CONCLUSION It is concluded that the clinical outcome of the treatment of burst thoracic and lumber spine fractures was not influenced by a lesser or greater degree of initial or residual kyphosis, regardless of the type of treatment recommended. In the follow-up radiographic evaluation, kyphosis was worse in the patients submitted to conservative treatment, as compared to the patients treated surgically. However, no relationship was found between the degree of initial kyphosis or final residual kyphosis, and clinical outcome, both in the patients treated conservatively and in those treated surgically. REFERENCES 1 Knight RQ, Stornelli DP, Chan DP, Devanny JR, Jackson KV. Comparison of operative versus nonoperative treatment of lumbar burst fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(293):112-21. Knight RQ Stornelli DP Chan DP Devanny JR Jackson KV Comparison of operative versus nonoperative treatment of lumbar burst fractures Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993 293 112 121 2 Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8(8):817-31. Denis F The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983 8 8 817 831 3 Kraemer WJ, Schemitsch EH, Lever J, McBroom RJ, McKee MD, Waddell JP. Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(8):541-4. Kraemer WJ Schemitsch EH Lever J McBroom RJ McKee MD Waddell JP Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit J Orthop Trauma 1996 10 8 541 544 4 Thomas KC, Bailey CS, Dvorak MF, Kwon B, Fisher C. Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(5):351-8. Thomas KC Bailey CS Dvorak MF Kwon B Fisher C Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit a systematic review J Neurosurg Spine 2006 4 5 351 358 5 Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994;3(4):184-201 Magerl F Aebi M Gertzbein SD Harms J Nazarian S A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries Eur Spine J 1994 3 4 184 201 6 Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C, et al. AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(23):2028-37. Vaccaro AR Oner C Kepler CK Dvorak M Schnake K Bellabarba C AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 38 23 2028 2037 7 Tisot RA, Avanzi O. Fratura da coluna vertebral tipo explosão na área da cauda equina: correlação entre função neurológica e alterações estruturais no canal vertebral. Acta Ortop Bras.2008;16(2):85-88. Tisot RA Avanzi O Fratura da coluna vertebral tipo explosão na área da cauda equina correlação entre função neurológica e alterações estruturais no canal vertebral Acta Ortop Bras 2008 16 2 85 88 8 Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I. Paraplegia. 1969;7(3):179-92. Frankel HL Hancock DO Hyslop G Melzak J Michaelis LS Ungar GH The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia I. Paraplegia 1969 7 3 179 192 9 Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83. Ware JE Jr Sherbourne CD The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 1992 30 6 473 483 10 Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271-3 Fairbank JC Couper J Davies JB O'Brien JP The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire Physiotherapy 1980 66 8 271 273 11 Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B. Reliability of Cobb and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(11):E227-34. Harrison DE Cailliet R Harrison DD Janik TJ Holland B Reliability of Cobb and Harrison posterior tangent methods which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001 26 11 E227 E234 12 Tisot RA, Avanzi O. Laminar fractures as a severity marker in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17(3):261-4. Tisot RA Avanzi O Laminar fractures as a severity marker in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2009 17 3 261 264 13 Whitesides TE Jr. Traumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;(128):78-92. Whitesides TE Jr Traumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977 128 78 92 14 Denis F, Armstrong GW, Searls K, Matta L. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurological deficit: a comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;(189):142-9. Denis F Armstrong GW Searls K Matta L Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurological deficit a comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984 189 142 149 15 McEvoy RD, Bradford DS. The management of burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Experience in 53 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985;10(7):631-7. McEvoy RD Bradford DS The management of burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine Experience in 53 patients Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985 10 7 631 637 16 Defino HLA, Fuentes ARR, Remondi PH, Ballim EC. Tratamento conservador das fraturas da coluna toracolombar. Rev Bras Ortop. 2000;35(8):301-8. Defino HLA Fuentes ARR Remondi PH Ballim EC Tratamento conservador das fraturas da coluna toracolombar Rev Bras Ortop 2000 35 8 301 308 17 Avanzi O, Chih LY, Meves R. Avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico da fratura toracolombar com material de terceira geração. Rev Bras Ortop. 2002;37(6):226-32. Avanzi O Chih LY Meves R Avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico da fratura toracolombar com material de terceira geração Rev Bras Ortop 2002 37 6 226 232 18 Dickson JH, Harrington PR, Erwin WD. Results of reduction and stabilization of the severely fractured thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(6):799-805. Dickson JH Harrington PR Erwin WD Results of reduction and stabilization of the severely fractured thoracic and lumbar spine J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978 60 6 799 805 19 Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, Garvey T, Jhanjee R, Sechriest V, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(5):773-81. Wood K Buttermann G Mehbod A Garvey T Jhanjee R Sechriest V Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit A prospective, randomized study J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003 85 5 773 781 20 Avanzi O, Chih LY, Meves R, Caffaro MFS, Bueno RS, Freitas MMF. Fratura toracolombar tipo explosão: resultados do tratamento conservador. Rev Bras Ortop. 2006;41(4):109-15. Avanzi O Chih LY Meves R Caffaro MFS Bueno RS Freitas MMF Fratura toracolombar tipo explosão resultados do tratamento conservador Rev Bras Ortop 2006 41 4 109 115 21 Tropiano P, Huang RC, Louis CA, Poitout DG, Louis RP. Functional and radiographic outcome of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures managed by closed orthopaedic reduction and casting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(21):2459-65. Tropiano P Huang RC Louis CA Poitout DG Louis RP Functional and radiographic outcome of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures managed by closed orthopaedic reduction and casting Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28 21 2459 2465 22 Cantor JB, Lebwohl NH, Garvey T, Eismont FJ. Nonoperative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fracture with early ambulation and bracing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(8):971-6. Cantor JB Lebwohl NH Garvey T Eismont FJ Nonoperative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fracture with early ambulation and bracing Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 18 8 971 976 23 Chow GH, Nelson BJ, Gebhard JS, Brugman JL, Brown CW, Donaldson DH. Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures managed with hyperextension casting or bracing and early mobilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(18):2170-5. Chow GH Nelson BJ Gebhard JS Brugman JL Brown CW Donaldson DH Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures managed with hyperextension casting or bracing and early mobilization Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 21 18 2170 2175 24 Shen WJ, Shen YS. Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(4):412-5. Shen WJ Shen YS Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 24 4 412 415 25 Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Goel VK. Thoracolumbar burst fractures. The clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(8):955-70. Mumford J Weinstein JN Spratt KF Goel VK Thoracolumbar burst fractures. The clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 18 8 955 970 26 Moller A, Hasserius R, Redlund- Johnell I, Ohlin A, Karlsson MK. Nonoperatively treated burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults: a 23- to 41-year follow-up. Spine J. 2007;7(6):701-7. Moller A Hasserius R Redlund- Johnell I Ohlin A Karlsson MK Nonoperatively treated burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults: a 23- to 41-year follow-up Spine J 2007 7 6 701 707 27 Andress HJ, Braun H, Helmberger T, Schurmann M, Hertlein H, Hartl WH. Long-term results after posterior fixation of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures. Injury.2002;33(4):357-65. Andress HJ Braun H Helmberger T Schurmann M Hertlein H Hartl WH Long-term results after posterior fixation of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures Injury 2002 33 4 357 365 28 Lakshmanan P, Jones A, Mehta J, Ahuja S, Davies PR, Howes JP. Recurrence of kyphosis and its functional implications after surgical stabilization of dorsolumbar unstable burst fractures. Spine J. 2009;9(12):1003-9. Lakshmanan P Jones A Mehta J Ahuja S Davies PR Howes JP Recurrence of kyphosis and its functional implications after surgical stabilization of dorsolumbar unstable burst fractures Spine J 2009 9 12 1003 1009 29 Gnanenthiran SR, Adie S, Harris IA. Nonoperative versus operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(2):567-77. Gnanenthiran SR Adie S Harris IA Nonoperative versus operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit a meta-analysis Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012 470 2 567 577 30 Yi L1, Jingping B, Gele J, Baoleri X, Taixiang W. Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD005079. Yi L1 Jingping B Gele J Baoleri X Taixiang W Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 4 CD005079 CD005079 Study conducted in the Spine Group of Hospital Ortopédico de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil