Seppo Taskinen 1 1 Section of Pediatric Urology, New Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; , Eija Mäkelä 2 2 Section of Pediatric Urology, New Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland , Niklas Pakkasjärvi 2 2 Section of Pediatric Urology, New Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Jun 28;39(1):221.
DOI: 10.1007/S00383-023-05506-x| ACCESS: 37378684
COMMENT
This is a retrospective study over 29 years at a single institution, which evaluated the need and effectiveness of bladder neck procedures (BNPs) in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) undergoing bladder augmentation. Patients were evaluated preoperatively with urodynamics, urinary tract ultrasound, renal function tests, and cystoscopy. In total, 87 patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 10.7 years. Urinary continence was achieved by 64 patients (74%), while occasional episodes of urinary incontinence were reported by 19 (22%) patients, and 4 patients (5%) remained incontinent (pad usage). Overall, 37 patients (43%) were treated by BNPs, including bladder neck injections (BNI) in 28 patients, fascial sling operation in 14 patients, and bladder neck closure (BNC) in five females. BNI and fascial sling procedures had comparable results for both sexes. Full continence was achieved in 10/28 (36%) patients with one or repeat BNIs and 9/14 (64%) with sling operation. The four female patients requiring BNC achieved urinary continence. In this cohort, myelomeningocele was the most common diagnosis and incontinence was mostly caused by neurogenic sphincter underactivity.
The primary goals for management of patients with NLUTD include protecting the upper urinary tract, achieving a safe situation in the lower urinary tract, providing a reservoir of sufficient volume and improving quality of life (1[No authors]. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan, March 2023. [Internet]. Available at. http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/
http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilation...
). In high-risk patients, bladder augmentation techniques have an established role despite inherent perioperative morbidity. Taskinen et al considered BNPs in two circumstances: if the patients remained incontinent despite an adequate size and low-pressure bladder, or concomitantly with bladder augmentation when sphincter underactivity was evident. Timing for BNPs may be challenging due to diagnostic uncertainties related to borderline urodynamic findings and low adherence to intermittent catheterization.
REFERENCES
- [No authors]. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan, March 2023. [Internet]. Available at. http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/
» http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
11 Mar 2024 -
Date of issue
Nov-Dec 2023
